pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.02382 · v1 · pith:NDIAKAF3new · submitted 2024-11-04 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

Improving Scientific Hypothesis Generation with Knowledge Grounded Large Language Models

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords knowledgescientificgenerationhypothesisllmskg-coilanguageresearch
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various scientific domains, from natural language processing to complex problem-solving tasks. Their ability to understand and generate human-like text has opened up new possibilities for advancing scientific research, enabling tasks such as data analysis, literature review, and even experimental design. One of the most promising applications of LLMs in this context is hypothesis generation, where they can identify novel research directions by analyzing existing knowledge. However, despite their potential, LLMs are prone to generating ``hallucinations'', outputs that are plausible-sounding but factually incorrect. Such a problem presents significant challenges in scientific fields that demand rigorous accuracy and verifiability, potentially leading to erroneous or misleading conclusions. To overcome these challenges, we propose KG-CoI (Knowledge Grounded Chain of Ideas), a novel system that enhances LLM hypothesis generation by integrating external, structured knowledge from knowledge graphs (KGs). KG-CoI guides LLMs through a structured reasoning process, organizing their output as a chain of ideas (CoI), and includes a KG-supported module for the detection of hallucinations. With experiments on our newly constructed hypothesis generation dataset, we demonstrate that KG-CoI not only improves the accuracy of LLM-generated hypotheses but also reduces the hallucination in their reasoning chains, highlighting its effectiveness in advancing real-world scientific research.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DN-Hypo-Pipeline: An AI-Driven Workflow for Generating Hypotheses using Large Language Models and Scientific Explanations

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DN-Hypo-Pipeline operationalizes three philosophy-of-science accounts to direct LLMs toward principle-based hypothesis generation, claims superior performance over direct prompting, and derives two new transformer alg...

  2. The Compressive Knowledge Graph Hypothesis: Which Graph Facts Matter for Scientific Hypothesis Generation?

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Empirical perturbations of local KGs across three LLMs reveal that compact top-k and other subsets often recover most of the hypothesis-generation signal, supporting a compressive KG hypothesis.

  3. Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator

    cs.DL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper proposes a four-role framework for LLMs in scientific innovation and reviews methods, benchmarks, and limitations across Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator roles.

  4. Position: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Significantly Advance Scientific Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Position paper claims multimodal LLMs can significantly advance scientific reasoning and proposes a four-stage roadmap plus challenges and suggestions.