Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Interacting phantom dark energy: new accelerating scaling attractors

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that interacting phantom dark energy, with two R2-gravity-inspired potentials, admits stable late-time scaling attractors in which dark matter and dark energy coexist.

desk verdict Solid incremental dynamical-systems analysis; the new scaling attractors are real, the center-manifold worry is a red herring, but the x=0 gap and missing observational checks keep it from being more than a specialist paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18300 v2 pith:3YV7OXQV submitted 2024-11-27 gr-qc astro-ph.COmath-phmath.MP

Sudip Halder , S. D. Odintsov , Supriya Pan , Tapan Saha , Emmanuel N. Saridakis This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COmath-phmath.MP PACS 98.80.-k95.36.+x
keywords interactingdarkenergyphantomdynamicalsystemanalysisscalingattractorscosmiccoincidenceproblemcentermanifoldtheoremsectorinteractionscalarfieldpotentials
topics Dark EnergyDark Matter
open problems Dark MatterDark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether phantom dark energy, normally associated with runaway acceleration, can interact with dark matter and still settle into stable late-time states in which both components coexist. The authors analyse four potentials and two interaction rates with dynamical-system methods, and they find that two newer potentials, one of the form $V(\phi)=\frac{1}{8\beta}(1-e^{-\kappa\mu\phi})^2$ and one composed of three exponentials, admit accelerating scaling attractors that the earlier exponential and hyperbolic potentials could not produce under the local interaction rate. If these attractors are real, interacting phantom models can alleviate the cosmic coincidence problem without giving up the phantom character of dark energy. The central new objects are the stable curve-like critical points G3 and J5, together with F3 for the global interaction, whose stability is decided through the centre-manifold theorem.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through autonomous dynamical systems built from dimensionless variables: $x$ for the scalar kinetic term, $y$ (or $v,w,\xi$) for the potential pieces, $\lambda$ for the running potential slope, and $z$ for the local-interaction Hubble ratio. For the potential $V(\phi)=\frac{1}{8\beta}(1-e^{-\kappa\mu\phi})^2$, the parameter $\lambda=-2\mu e^{-\kappa\mu\phi}/(1-e^{-\kappa\mu\phi})$ and the relation $\Xi=\mu/\lambda+1/2$ close the system, while for the exponential-sum potential the variables $v,w,\xi$ absorb the three exponential terms. The key technical machinery for the new points is normal hyperbolicity: each of F3, G3 and J5 is a curve of critical points with one zero eigenvalue and the remaining eigenvalues negative, so stability is decided by the centre-manifold theorem, which controls the flow along the zero-eigenvalue direction, rather than by the linearisation alone; the paper invokes that theorem to conclude stability under the stated sign conditions.

What would settle it

Compute the centre-manifold reduction along the zero-eigenvalue direction for the points F3, G3 and J5; if the reduced one-dimensional flow is repelling for $\mu x_c>0$, or for $-1/\sqrt{2}\leq x_c<0$, the claimed stability is false. A numerical integration of the full autonomous systems starting near those curves would settle the matter directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that interacting phantom cosmology is not generically devoid of late-time accelerating scaling solutions: for the potentials $V(\phi)=\frac{1}{8\beta}(1-e^{-\kappa\mu\phi})^2$ and $V(\phi)=c_0+c_1e^{\sqrt{2\kappa^2/3}\phi}+c_2e^{2\sqrt{2\kappa^2/3}\phi}$, with the local interaction $Q=\Gamma\rho_m$, the autonomous systems contain normally hyperbolic curves of critical points, G3 and J5, that are stable under stated parameter conditions and have $0<\Omega_\phi<1$. Along these curves the total equation of state is $-1$, so the universe accelerates while dark matter and dark energy both contribute non-trivially. The paper also reports a stable scaling curve, F3, for the first new potential under the global interaction $Q=\alpha H\rho_m$ at $\alpha=-3$. The authors emphasise that for the exponential and hyperbolic potentials the local interaction produces no such attractors, so the novelty comes from the potential forms themselves. Stability of these curves is established by invoking the centre-manifold theorem for critical points with one zero eigenvalue and the remaining eigenvalues negative.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's late-time stability claim rests on applying the centre-manifold theorem to curves of critical points with one zero eigenvalue, but the actual centre-manifold reduction and the one-dimensional dynamics are not shown, so the stability of the new attractors is asserted rather than proved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Stable late-time scaling attractors with $\Omega_m/\Omega_\phi\neq 0$ exist in interacting phantom cosmology for the two new potentials, so the cosmic coincidence problem can be alleviated in a phantom setting.
  • For the local interaction $Q=\Gamma\rho_m$, the exponential and hyperbolic potentials produce no accelerating scaling attractors, whereas the two new potentials do, indicating that the potential form, not just the interaction, controls the existence of such attractors.
  • All late-time critical points at infinity are found to be unstable, so the physical late-time states are the finite critical points, including the new scaling curves.
  • The scenario permits a matter-dominated saddle epoch followed by a stable accelerating phase, either dark-energy dominated or with dark matter and dark energy coexisting, independently of initial conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the centre-manifold stability of G3 and J5 survives an explicit reduction, similar scaling curves should appear for other one-parameter families of potentials whose $\lambda$-evolution has the same quadratic form, suggesting a general mechanism rather than a coincidence of these two potentials.
  • The two new potentials originate as effective scalar-field descriptions of $R^2$- and $R+R^2+\Lambda$-gravity, and the paper treats them only as general-relativity scalar potentials; a testable inference is that interacting-phantom scaling behaviour might be a low-energy echo of those higher-order gravity theories.
  • Because the stability of the scaling curves rests on a theorem invoked rather than demonstrated, a direct numerical integration of the full autonomous systems near the curves would confirm the claimed attraction basins.
  • The attractors have $w_{\rm tot}=-1$ exactly, so an observational test would be to fit the two potentials plus $Q=\Gamma\rho_m$ to distance and structure-growth data and check whether a parameter region with acceleration and order-one $\Omega_m/\Omega_\phi$ is preferred.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper performs a dynamical-systems analysis of interacting phantom dark energy in a flat FLRW universe, considering two interaction forms (the global Q = αHρ_m and the local Q = Γρ_m) and four scalar-field potentials: exponential, hyperbolic cosine, (1 - e^{-κμφ})^2/(8β), and c0 + c1 e^{√(2κ^2/3)φ} + c2 e^{2√(2κ^2/3)φ}. For each combination the authors derive the autonomous system, find the critical points (including curves of fixed points), compute their eigenvalues, and analyze critical points at infinity via Poincaré compactification. The central claim is that for the two new potentials with the local interaction, the curves G3 (Table VI) and J5 (Table IX) are stable accelerating scaling attractors in which dark matter and dark energy coexist, thus alleviating the coincidence problem, and that these attractors are new in the literature.

Significance. If the stability claims hold, the paper identifies genuinely new late-time scaling attractors in interacting phantom cosmology, a sector where such solutions had been thought to be rare. The derivation is non-circular: the attractors emerge from the stated potentials and interaction forms with no fitted constants, and the fixed-point computations reduce correctly in known limits (for example, the exponential potential with the local interaction reproduces the previously reported absence of accelerating scaling attractors). The authors also provide a systematic treatment of critical points at infinity, which strengthens the analysis. The main caveats are that the stability of the headline attractors rests on an unperformed center-manifold reduction, and that the singular surface x = 0 is excluded from the phase space without a blow-up analysis, leaving the global picture incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.C.2 (Table VI), Sec. III.D.2 (Table IX), Sec. III.C.1 (Table V)] The stability of the new accelerating scaling curves G3 and J5 (and also F3) is deduced solely by citing the center manifold theorem [103], but the required center manifold reduction is never presented. In each case the linearization has one zero eigenvalue and the remaining eigenvalues are negative in the claimed stability window, yet a zero eigenvalue alone does not determine stability: the reduced dynamics on the center manifold decides. For these systems the zero eigenvector is tangent to a one-parameter curve of fixed points, so the center manifold is the curve itself and the reduced flow is identically zero; this should be stated explicitly, together with the clarification that the individual points are Lyapunov stable and the curve is attracting as a set rather than asymptotically stable. As written, the central claim that G3 and J5 are stable late-time attractors is asserted rather than demonstrated.
  2. [Sec. III.A.1 (and analogous passages in Secs. III.B.1, III.C.1, III.D.1)] The phase space contains the singular surface x = 0, which is interior for y ≠ 0, and the text excludes it, stating that a blow-up analysis 'is a subject for further investigation'; however, no blow-up analysis of x = 0 is actually provided anywhere in the paper (Appendix A, invoked in this context, treats only the Poincaré compactification at infinity). The late-time claims are therefore established only on the regular part of the phase space, and possible additional attractors or asymptotic behavior on x = 0 are left unclassified. The authors should either perform the blow-up analysis or explicitly restrict all global conclusions to D \ {x = 0} (and z ≠ 1 for the local interaction), and adjust the wording of the abstract and conclusions accordingly.
  3. [Table VII and Table VIII, point I2] The stability condition for the scaling point I2 appears to be incorrect. The eigenvalues listed in Table VIII are E1 = (3+α)/4 and E2 = (3+α)/2, which are positive for α > -3; hence I2 cannot be stable on the interval (-3, (-13+√88)/3] as stated in Table VII. The stability region should presumably be restricted to the first interval [(-13-√88)/3, -17/3], where both eigenvalues are negative. This error does not affect the main local-interaction result, but it is a concrete mistake in the global-interaction analysis of the fourth potential and should be corrected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.A.1] The sentence 'After applying a re-parametrization, as outlined in Appendix A 1, one can use blow-up techniques' is misleading, because Appendix A 1 does not contain a blow-up analysis of the x = 0 singularity; please clarify where this analysis is performed or remove the reference.
  2. [Appendix D 2] In the paragraph discussing the critical points at infinity for the local interaction with the fourth potential, the text states 'Therefore, F+∞ exhibits unstable behavior' but the section is about J+∞; this appears to be a typo.
  3. [Appendix C 2] The word 'namelt' should read 'namely'.
  4. [Table IX and Sec. III.D.2] For J5 at the endpoint x_c = -1/√2 the table gives Ωm = 1 while wtot = -1; the text calls this a completely matter-dominated solution, but the phantom field then has vanishing energy density with nonzero pressure. A clarifying sentence would help the reader understand this limiting case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scaling attractors are outputs of the stated autonomous systems, not inputs; self-citations are background or standard-mathematics citations.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from explicit inputs: the interaction rates Q = αHρm and Q = Γρm, and the four stated potentials. The paper then constructs autonomous systems, solves for critical points, and computes Jacobian eigenvalues. The advertised new points G3 (Table VI) and J5 (Table IX) are curves of fixed points obtained by solving the algebraic fixed-point equations, and their claimed stability regions (µxc > 0 for G3; −1/√2 ≤ xc < 0 for J5, with γ < 0) are read off from the eigenvalues. No parameter is fitted to produce these attractors, and no target prediction is used as an input. The self-citations, e.g. [98] for earlier exponential-potential results and [103] for the center manifold theorem, do not smuggle in the paper's central claim. The citation to [103] invokes a standard mathematical theorem whose assumptions do not include the target result; it is therefore independent support in the circularity sense, even though the paper does not display the center-manifold reduction for the zero-eigenvalue directions. That omission is a rigor/completeness concern, not a circularity: a zero eigenvalue alone does not settle stability, but the missing reduction is an unperformed proof rather than an equivalence between input and output. The novelty claim is a literature comparison, not a derivation from the model. No circular step can be quoted or exhibited, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a mathematical result about a class of cosmological models. It assumes standard GR, FLRW geometry, a phantom scalar with specified potentials, and two interaction forms from the literature. The model parameters alpha, gamma, mu, lambda and eta are free and scanned; none are fitted to data. No new particles, forces, dimensions or other entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • alpha
    Coupling of the global interaction Q = alpha H rho_m; new scaling attractors require alpha < -3 or alpha = -3 in some cases. Scanned over parameter space, not fitted.
  • gamma
    Dimensionless coupling Gamma/H0 for the local interaction Q = Gamma rho_m; the new attractors G3 and J5 require gamma < 0. Scanned, not fitted.
  • mu
    Slope parameter of potential (16); stability of the curve G3 requires mu x_c > 0. Scanned, not fitted.
  • lambda
    Slope of the exponential potential; appears in the existence and stability conditions for points A1, A2, B1 and B2. Scanned, not fitted.
  • eta
    Slope parameter of the hyperbolic potential; appears in the stability conditions for points C1-C4 and D1-D4. Scanned, not fitted.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption General relativity with a flat FLRW metric
    Equations (1)-(6) set the gravitational and geometric framework for the entire analysis.
  • domain assumption Dark matter is a pressureless perfect fluid with w_m = 0
    Explicitly stated in Section III: 'we focus on the case w_m = 0'.
  • domain assumption Phantom scalar field action with negative kinetic term
    Action (2) gives rho_phi = -phi_dot^2/2 + V and the modified Klein-Gordon equation (9).
  • domain assumption Interaction forms Q = alpha H rho_m and Q = Gamma rho_m
    Equations (12)-(13), adopted from prior literature as the two interaction choices.
  • domain assumption Four potential forms, including two from R2 gravity literature
    Equations (14)-(17); the last two potentials are the novel ingredient of the paper.
  • standard math Dynamical systems theorems: Hartman-Grobman, center manifold, Poincare compactification
    Used to classify stability, especially for the normally hyperbolic curves F3, G3 and J5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interacting phantom dark energy: new accelerating scaling attractors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3YV7OXQV

@misc{pith2026241118300,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interacting phantom dark energy: new accelerating scaling attractors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3YV7OXQV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18300}
}
read the original abstract

We perform a detailed investigation of interacting phantom cosmology, by applying the powerful method of dynamical system analysis. We consider two well-studied interaction forms, namely one global and one local one, while the novel ingredient of our work is the examination of new potentials for the phantom field. Our analysis shows the existence of saddle matter-dominated points, stable dark-energy dominated points, and scaling accelerating solutions, that can attract the Universe at late times. As we show, some of the stable accelerating scaling attractors, in which dark matter and dark energy can co-exist, alleviating the cosmic coincidence problem, are totally new, even for the previously studied interaction rates, and arise purely from the novel potential forms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18300 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Accelerating scaling solutions from dark matter particle creation

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Accelerating scaling attractors without dark energy appear only when the interaction is controlled by DM density and energy flows from DM to a barotropic fluid.

  2. Revise the Dark Matter-Phantom Scalar Field Interaction

    gr-qc 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A compactified phase-space analysis of four dark matter/phantom scalar interactions shows one model avoids Big Rip singularities, one needs a small coupling to avoid them, and two have singular surfaces that make them...

  3. An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The apparent preference for evolving dark energy depends strongly on which supernova catalog and which BAO survey are used, and is not robust across all independent data combinations.

  4. Cosmological Interactions with Phantom Scalar Field: Revisiting Background Phase-Space Analysis with Compactified Variables

    gr-qc 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A compactified variable transformation for phantom scalar field cosmology reproduces prior Hubble-normalized results and shows that chosen interaction terms avoid Big Rip singularities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

170 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [103]

    Thus, these points can alleviate the coincidence problem for the model pa- rameter α = −3

    we deduce that these critical points behave as stable points for µxc > 0. Thus, these points can alleviate the coincidence problem for the model pa- rameter α = −3. Finally, from the critical point analysis at infinity (see Appendix C 1), we deduce that the phase space domain D includes four such critical points, namely E±∞ 1 ± 1√ 2 , 1√ 2 , 0, 0 , and E±...

  2. [1]

    Model I: Q = αHρ m Using the above dimensionless variables we obtain the autonomous system as x′ = − 3 2 x 1 + x2 + v2 + w2 + ξ2 + w2 + 2ξ2 − α 1 + x2 − v2 − w2 − ξ2 2x , (51) v′ = 3 2 v 1 − x2 − v2 − w2 − ξ2 , (52) w′ = w x + 3 2 1 − x2 − v2 − w2 − ξ2 , (53) ξ′ = ξ 2x + 3 2 1 − x2 − v2 − w2 − ξ2 . (54) This system is invariant under the transformations v...

  3. [2]

    The above autonomous system is invariant under y − → −y, and the phase space domain is defined as D = (x, y, λ, z) ∈ R4 : 0 ≤ −x2 + y2 ≤ 1, y≥ 0, 0 ≤ z ≤ 1

    Model II: Q = Γρm In this case, using the dimensionless variables x, y, λ, z of (21), (28) and (33), we result to the autonomous system x′ = −3x − √ 6 2 λy2 + 3 2 x 1 − x2 − y2 − γz 1 + x2 − y2 2x(1 − z) , (45) y′ = − √ 6 2 λxy + 3 2 y 1 − x2 − y2 , (46) λ′ = √ 6 2 λ2 − 2µλ x, (47) z′ = 3 2 z(1 − z) 1 − x2 − y2 , (48) where γ = Γ /H0. The above autonomous...

  4. [3]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, and J. Silk, In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions, Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 153001 (2021), arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2021

  5. [4]

    Fund for Improvement of S&T Infrastructure (FIST)

    Model II: Q = Γρm In this case, using the dimensionless variables v, w, ξ defined in (49), the variable z defined in (28) and the di- mensionless variable x from (21), the autonomous system can be written as x′ = − 3 2 x 1 + x2 + v2 + w2 + ξ2 + w2 + 2ξ2 − γ 1 + x2 − v2 − w2 − ξ2 z 2x(1 − z) , (56) v′ = 3 2 v 1 − x2 − v2 − w2 − ξ2 , (57) w′ = w x + 3 2 1 −...

    2019

  6. [5]

    Thus, one may expect that there are critical points at infinity

    Model I: Q = αHρ m The phase space domain of the autonomous system (25)-(26) is not compact in the x − y direction. Thus, one may expect that there are critical points at infinity. Since the autonomous system is ill-defined at x = 0 we divide the phase-space domain D into two parts: the first one for x >0 and the second one forx <0, i.e. we remove x = 0 s...

  7. [6]

    Model II: Q = Γρm The dynamical system (29)-(31) exhibits a singularity at x = 0, making the system ill-defined there. Thus, in the part of the domain D where x >0, we utilize the re- parametrization dN = x(1−z)dτ , simplifying the system (29)-(31) to the form dx dτ = −3x2(1 − z) + 3 2 x2 1 − x2 − y2 (1 − z) − √ 6 2 λxy2(1 − z) − γz 1 + x2 − y2 2 , (A11) ...

  8. [7]

    (B3) The vector field corresponding to the system described above is represented by the components P , Q and R

    Model I: Q = αHρ m For the phase-space domain D+ = D \ {x ≤ 0}, the re-parametrization, defined as dN = xdτ , transforms the 17 systems (34)-(36) into the following: dx dτ = −3x2 − √ 6 2 λxy2 + 3 2 x2 1 − x2 − y2 − α 2 1 + x2 − y2 , (B1) dy dτ = − √ 6 2 λx2y + 3 2 xy 1 − x2 − y2 , (B2) dλ dτ = √ 6 λ2 − η2 x2. (B3) The vector field corresponding to the sys...

Show all 170 references
  1. [8]

    Model II: Q = Γρm Making use of the re-parametrization, defined as dN = x(1 − z)dτ for the phase-space domain D+ = D \ {x ≤ 0}, the system of equations (37)-(40) becomes dx dτ = −3x2(1 − z) + 3 2 x2 1 − x2 − y2 (1 − z) − √ 6 2 λxy2(1 − z) − γz 1 + x2 − y2 2 , (B10) dy dτ = " −...

  2. [9]

    (C3) The components P , Q and R represent the vector field corresponding to the system outlined above

    Model I: Q = αHρ m For the system of equations (42)-(44), the re- parametrization dN = xdτ in the phase-space domain D+ = D \ {x ≤ 0} yields the following: dx dτ = −3x2 − √ 6 2 λxy2 + 3 2 x2 1 − x2 − y2 − α 2 1 + x2 − y2 , (C1) dy dτ = − √ 6 2 λx2y + 3 2 xy 1 − x2 − y2 , (C2) ...

  3. [10]

    This suggests that the critical points at infinity are {(u, 0, 0) : u ∈ R}, 0, − q 3 2 , 0 , 1, − q 3 2 , 0 and −1, − q 3 2 , 0 . From the viewpoint of our phase space domain, the critical points at infinity located on S3 are E+∞ 1 1√ 2 , 1√ 2 , 0, 0 and E+∞ 2 q 2 7 , q 2 7 , ...

  4. [11]

    Model II: Q = Γρm After using a re-parametrization of the form dN = x(1 − z)dτ in the phase-space domain D+ = D \ {x ≤ 0} for the system of equations (45)-(48), we get dx dτ = −3x2(1 − z) + 3 2 x2 1 − x2 − y2 (1 − z) − √ 6 2 λxy2(1 − z) − γz 1 + x2 − y2 2 , (C10) dy dτ = " − √...

  5. [12]

    Model I: Q = αHρ m By introducing the re-parametrization dN = xdτ in the phase space domain D+ = D \ {x ≤ 0}, the system (51)-(54) becomes dx dτ = − 3 2 x2 1 + x2 + v2 + w2 + ξ2 + xw2 + 2xξ2 − α 1 + x2 − v2 − w2 − ξ2 2 , (D1) dv dτ = 3 2 xv 1 − x2 − v2 − w2 − ξ2 , (D2) dw dτ =...

  6. [13]

    (D16) dz dτ = 3 2 xz(1 − z)2 1 − x2 − v2 − w2 − ξ2

    Model II: Q = Γρm The system of equations (56)-(60) is simplified by in- troducing the re-parametrization dN = x(1 − z)dτ for the phase space domain D+ = D \ {x ≤ 0}, as dx dτ = (1 − z) h − 3 2 x2 1 + x2 + v2 + w2 + ξ2 + xw2 +2xξ2 i − α 1 + x2 − v2 − w2 − ξ2 2 , (D13) dv dτ = ...

  7. [14]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603057

    2006 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Bamba, S

    K. Bamba, S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Dark energy cosmology: the equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests, As- trophys. Space Sci. 342, 155 (2012), arXiv:1205.3421 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  9. [16]

    W. Yang, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, R. C. Nunes, S. Vagnozzi, and D. F. Mota, Tale of stable interacting dark energy, observational signatures, and the H0 ten- sion, JCAP 09, 019, arXiv:1805.08252 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Perivolaropoulos and F

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, Challenges for ΛCDM: An update, New Astron. Rev. 95, 101659 (2022), arXiv:2105.05208 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Abdalla et al

    E. Abdalla et al. , Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology asso- ciated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies, JHEAp 34, 49 (2022), arXiv:2203.06142 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Amendola, Coupled quintessence, Phys

    L. Amendola, Coupled quintessence, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043511 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9908023

    2000 arXiv

  13. [20]

    L. P. Chimento, A. S. Jakubi, D. Pavon, and W. Zim- dahl, Interacting quintessence solution to the coin- cidence problem, Phys. Rev. D 67, 083513 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0303145

    2003 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Cai and A

    R.-G. Cai and A. Wang, Cosmology with interaction between phantom dark energy and dark matter and the coincidence problem, JCAP 03, 002, arXiv:hep- th/0411025

  15. [22]

    Pavon and W

    D. Pavon and W. Zimdahl, Holographic dark energy and cosmic coincidence, Phys. Lett. B 628, 206 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505020

    2005 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Huey and B

    G. Huey and B. D. Wandelt, Interacting quintessence. The Coincidence problem and cosmic acceleration, Phys. Rev. D 74, 023519 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0407196

    2006

  17. [24]

    Hu and Y

    B. Hu and Y. Ling, Interacting dark energy, holographic principle and coincidence problem, Phys. Rev. D 73, 123510 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0601093

    2006 arXiv

  18. [25]

    del Campo, R

    S. del Campo, R. Herrera, and D. Pavon, Toward a so- lution of the coincidence problem, Phys. Rev. D 78, 021302 (2008), arXiv:0806.2116 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  19. [26]

    del Campo, R

    S. del Campo, R. Herrera, and D. Pavon, Interacting models may be key to solve the cosmic coincidence prob- lem, JCAP 01, 020, arXiv:0812.2210 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  20. [27]

    Kumar and R

    S. Kumar and R. C. Nunes, Echo of interactions in the dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 96, 103511 (2017), arXiv:1702.02143 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, and O. Mena, Can in- teracting dark energy solve the H0 tension?, Phys. Rev. D 96, 043503 (2017), arXiv:1704.08342 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [29]

    M. R. Setare, Interacting holographic dark energy model in non-flat universe, Phys. Lett. B 642, 1 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0609069

    2006 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Kumar, R

    S. Kumar, R. C. Nunes, and S. K. Yadav, Dark sec- tor interaction: a remedy of the tensions between CMB and LSS data, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 576 (2019), arXiv:1903.04865 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [31]

    S. Pan, W. Yang, C. Singha, and E. N. Saridakis, Ob- servational constraints on sign-changeable interaction models and alleviation of the H0 tension, Phys. Rev. D 100, 083539 (2019), arXiv:1903.10969 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [32]

    S. Pan, W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, E. N. Saridakis, and S. Chakraborty, Interacting scenarios with dynamical dark energy: Observational constraints and alleviation of the H0 tension, Phys. Rev. D 100, 103520 (2019), arXiv:1907.07540 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena, and S. Vagnozzi, Interacting dark energy in the early 2020s: A promising solution to the H0 and cosmic shear tensions, Phys. Dark Univ. 30, 100666 (2020), arXiv:1908.04281 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [34]

    S. Pan, W. Yang, and A. Paliathanasis, Non-linear in- teracting cosmological models after Planck 2018 legacy release and the H0 tension, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 493, 3114 (2020), arXiv:2002.03408 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Pan and W

    S. Pan and W. Yang, On the interacting dark energy scenarios − the case for Hubble constant tension (2023), arXiv:2310.07260 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Guo, R.-G

    Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and Y.-Z. Zhang, Cosmological evolution of interacting phantom energy with dark mat- ter, JCAP 05, 002, arXiv:astro-ph/0412624

    arXiv

  30. [37]

    R. A. Sussman, I. Quiros, and O. Martin Gonza- lez, Inhomogeneous models of interacting dark mat- ter and dark energy, Gen. Rel. Grav. 37, 2117 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0503609

    2005 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Zimdahl, Interacting dark energy and cosmological equations of state, Int

    W. Zimdahl, Interacting dark energy and cosmological equations of state, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D14, 2319 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505056

    2005 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Wang, Y.-g

    B. Wang, Y.-g. Gong, and E. Abdalla, Transition of the dark energy equation of state in an interacting holo- graphic dark energy model, Phys. Lett. B 624, 141 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0506069

    2005 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Wang, C.-Y

    B. Wang, C.-Y. Lin, and E. Abdalla, Constraints on the interacting holographic dark energy model, Phys. Lett. B 637, 357 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0509107

    2006 arXiv

  34. [41]

    J. D. Barrow and T. Clifton, Cosmologies with energy exchange, Phys. Rev. D 73, 103520 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0604063

    2006

  35. [42]

    Suwa and T

    M. Suwa and T. Nihei, Observational constraints on the interacting Ricci dark energy model, Phys. Rev. D 81, 023519 (2010), arXiv:0911.4810 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  36. [43]

    N. J. Poplawski, Interacting dark energy in f(R) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 74, 084032 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0607124

    2006 arXiv

  37. [44]

    H. M. Sadjadi and M. Honardoost, Thermodynamics second law and omega = -1 crossing(s) in interacting holographic dark energy model, Phys. Lett. B 647, 231 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0609076

    2007 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Chang, H.-Y

    B.-R. Chang, H.-Y. Liu, L.-X. Xu, C.-W. Zhang, and Y.-L. Ping, Statefinder Parameters for Interact- ing Phantom Energy with Dark Matter, JCAP 01, 016, arXiv:astro-ph/0612616

    arXiv

  39. [46]

    K. H. Kim, H. W. Lee, and Y. S. Myung, Non-flat uni- verse and interacting dark energy model, Phys. Lett. B 648, 107 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612112

    2007 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Rosenfeld, Reconstruction of interacting dark en- ergy models from parameterizations, Phys

    R. Rosenfeld, Reconstruction of interacting dark en- ergy models from parameterizations, Phys. Rev. D 75, 083509 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0701213. 24

    2007 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Zimdahl and D

    W. Zimdahl and D. Pavon, Interacting holographic dark energy, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 5461 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0606555

    2007 arXiv

  42. [49]

    C. Feng, B. Wang, Y. Gong, and R.-K. Su, Testing the viability of the interacting holographic dark energy model by using combined observational constraints, JCAP 09, 005, arXiv:0706.4033 [astro-ph]

    arXiv

  43. [50]

    N. Cruz, S. Lepe, and F. Pena, Dark energy interact- ing with two fluids, Phys. Lett. B 663, 338 (2008), arXiv:0804.3777 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  44. [51]

    S. Chen, B. Wang, and J. Jing, Dynamics of interact- ing dark energy model in Einstein and Loop Quan- tum Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 78, 123503 (2008), arXiv:0808.3482 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Jamil, E

    M. Jamil, E. N. Saridakis, and M. R. Setare, Thermo- dynamics of dark energy interacting with dark mat- ter and radiation, Phys. Rev. D 81, 023007 (2010), arXiv:0910.0822 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  46. [53]

    B. M. Jackson, A. Taylor, and A. Berera, On the large-scale instability in interacting dark energy and dark matter fluids, Phys. Rev. D 79, 043526 (2009), arXiv:0901.3272 [astro-ph.CO]

    2009 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Valiviita, R

    J. Valiviita, R. Maartens, and E. Majerotto, Obser- vational constraints on an interacting dark energy model, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 402, 2355 (2010), arXiv:0907.4987 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Tamanini, E

    N. Tamanini, E. N. Saridakis, and T. S. Koivisto, The Cosmology of Interacting Spin-2 Fields, JCAP 02, 015, arXiv:1307.5984 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  49. [56]

    Karami and S

    K. Karami and S. Ghaffari, The generalized second law of thermodynamics for the interacting dark energy in a non-flat FR W universe enclosed by the apparent and event horizons, Phys. Lett. B 685, 115 (2010), arXiv:0912.0363 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Wei, Revisiting the Cosmological Constraints on the Interacting Dark Energy Models, Phys

    H. Wei, Revisiting the Cosmological Constraints on the Interacting Dark Energy Models, Phys. Lett. B691, 173 (2010), arXiv:1004.0492 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Martinelli, L

    M. Martinelli, L. Lopez Honorez, A. Melchiorri, and O. Mena, Future CMB cosmological constraints in a dark coupled universe, Phys. Rev. D 81, 103534 (2010), arXiv:1004.2410 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  52. [59]

    M. B. Gavela, L. Lopez Honorez, O. Mena, and S. Rigolin, Dark Coupling and Gauge Invariance, JCAP 11, 044, arXiv:1005.0295 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  53. [60]

    Lopez Honorez, B

    L. Lopez Honorez, B. A. Reid, O. Mena, L. Verde, and R. Jimenez, Coupled dark matter-dark energy in light of near Universe observations, JCAP 09, 029, arXiv:1006.0877 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  54. [61]

    Baldi, Clarifying the Effects of Interacting Dark En- ergy on Linear and nonlinear Structure Formation Pro- cesses, Mon

    M. Baldi, Clarifying the Effects of Interacting Dark En- ergy on Linear and nonlinear Structure Formation Pro- cesses, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 414, 116 (2011), arXiv:1012.0002 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  55. [62]

    X.-m. Chen, Y. Gong, E. N. Saridakis, and Y. Gong, Time-dependent interacting dark energy and transient acceleration, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53, 469 (2014), arXiv:1111.6743 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Baldi and P

    M. Baldi and P. Salucci, Constraints on interacting dark energy models from galaxy Rotation Curves, JCAP 02, 014, arXiv:1111.3953 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  57. [64]

    L. P. Chimento, M. G. Richarte, and I. E. S´ anchez Garc ´ ıa, Interacting dark sector with vari- able vacuum energy, Phys. Rev. D 88, 087301 (2013), arXiv:1310.5335 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Harko and F

    T. Harko and F. S. N. Lobo, Irreversible thermodynamic description of interacting dark energy-dark matter cos- mological models, Phys. Rev. D 87, 044018 (2013), arXiv:1210.3617 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Sun and R.-H

    C.-Y. Sun and R.-H. Yue, Stable large-scale perturba- tions in interacting dark-energy model, JCAP 08, 018, arXiv:1303.0684 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  60. [67]

    Li and X

    Y.-H. Li and X. Zhang, Large-scale stable interacting dark energy model: Cosmological perturbations and ob- servational constraints, Phys. Rev. D89, 083009 (2014), arXiv:1312.6328 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena, and S. Vagnozzi, Nonminimal dark sector physics and cos- mological tensions, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063502 (2020), arXiv:1910.09853 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Yang and L

    W. Yang and L. Xu, Cosmological constraints on in- teracting dark energy with redshift-space distortion af- ter Planck data, Phys. Rev. D 89, 083517 (2014), arXiv:1401.1286 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Li, J.-F

    Y.-H. Li, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Exploring the full parameter space for an interacting dark energy model with recent observations including redshift-space distortions: Application of the parametrized post- Friedmann approach, Phys. Rev. D 90, 123007 (2014), arXiv:1409.7205...

    2014 arXiv

  64. [71]

    S. Pan, S. Bhattacharya, and S. Chakraborty, An an- alytic model for interacting dark energy and its obser- vational constraints, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 452, 3038 (2015), arXiv:1210.0396 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  65. [72]

    D. G. A. Duniya, D. Bertacca, and R. Maartens, Probing the imprint of interacting dark energy on very large scales, Phys. Rev. D 91, 063530 (2015), arXiv:1502.06424 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Li, J.-F

    Y.-H. Li, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Testing mod- els of vacuum energy interacting with cold dark mat- ter, Phys. Rev. D 93, 023002 (2016), arXiv:1506.06349 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Odderskov, M

    I. Odderskov, M. Baldi, and L. Amendola, The effect of interacting dark energy on local measurements of the Hubble constant, JCAP 05, 035, arXiv:1510.04314 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  68. [75]

    R. C. Nunes, S. Pan, and E. N. Saridakis, New constraints on interacting dark energy from cos- mic chronometers, Phys. Rev. D 94, 023508 (2016), arXiv:1605.01712 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  69. [76]

    E. G. M. Ferreira, J. Quintin, A. A. Costa, E. Abdalla, and B. Wang, Evidence for interacting dark energy from BOSS, Phys. Rev. D95, 043520 (2017), arXiv:1412.2777 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  70. [77]

    S. K. Biswas, W. Khyllep, J. Dutta, and S. Chakraborty, Dynamical analysis of an interacting dark energy model in the framework of a particle creation mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 95, 103009 (2017), arXiv:1604.07636 [gr- qc]

    2017 arXiv

  71. [78]

    A. A. Costa, X.-D. Xu, B. Wang, and E. Abdalla, Con- straints on interacting dark energy models from Planck 2015 and redshift-space distortion data, JCAP 01, 028, arXiv:1605.04138 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  72. [79]

    M. S. Linton, A. Pourtsidou, R. Crittenden, and R. Maartens, Variable sound speed in interacting dark energy models, JCAP 04, 043, arXiv:1711.05196 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv

  73. [80]

    W. Yang, S. Pan, L. Xu, and D. F. Mota, Effects of anisotropic stress in interacting dark matter – dark en- ergy scenarios, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 482, 1858 25 (2019), arXiv:1804.08455 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Bernui, E

    A. Bernui, E. Di Valentino, W. Giar` e, S. Kumar, and R. C. Nunes, Exploring the H0 tension and the evidence for dark sector interactions from 2D BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D 107, 103531 (2023), arXiv:2301.06097 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  75. [82]

    C. Li, X. Ren, M. Khurshudyan, and Y.-F. Cai, Impli- cations of the possible 21-cm line excess at cosmic dawn on dynamics of interacting dark energy, Phys. Lett. B 801, 135141 (2020), arXiv:1904.02458 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  76. [83]

    W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, and R. C. Nunes, All-inclusive interacting dark sector cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D 101, 083509 (2020), arXiv:2001.10852 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  77. [84]

    S. Pan, G. S. Sharov, and W. Yang, Field theoretic in- terpretations of interacting dark energy scenarios and recent observations, Phys. Rev. D 101, 103533 (2020), arXiv:2001.03120 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  78. [85]

    S. Pan, J. de Haro, W. Yang, and J. Amor´ os, Under- standing the phenomenology of interacting dark energy scenarios and their theoretical bounds, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123506 (2020), arXiv:2001.09885 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena, S. Pan, and W. Yang, Interacting Dark Energy in a closed uni- verse, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 502, L23 (2021), arXiv:2011.00283 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  80. [87]

    W. Yang, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, and A. Melchiorri, 2021-H0 odyssey: closed, phantom and interacting dark energy cosmologies, JCAP 10, 008, arXiv:2101.03129 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Gao, Z.-W

    L.-Y. Gao, Z.-W. Zhao, S.-S. Xue, and X. Zhang, Reliev- ing the H 0 tension with a new interacting dark energy model, JCAP 07, 005, arXiv:2101.10714 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  82. [89]

    Chatzidakis, A

    S. Chatzidakis, A. Giacomini, P. G. L. Leach, G. Leon, A. Paliathanasis, and S. Pan, Interacting dark energy in curved FLR W spacetime from Weyl Integrable Space- time, JHEAp 36, 141 (2022), arXiv:2206.06639 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Hou, J.-Z

    W.-T. Hou, J.-Z. Qi, T. Han, J.-F. Zhang, S. Cao, and X. Zhang, Prospects for constraining interact- ing dark energy models from gravitational wave and gamma ray burst joint observation, JCAP 05, 017, arXiv:2211.10087 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  84. [91]

    S. Pan, W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, D. F. Mota, and J. Silk, IWDM: the fate of an interacting non- cold dark matter — vacuum scenario, JCAP 07, 064, arXiv:2211.11047 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  85. [92]

    W. Yang, S. Pan, O. Mena, and E. Di Valentino, On the dynamics of a dark sector coupling, JHEAp 40, 19 (2023), arXiv:2209.14816 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Y. Zhai, W. Giar` e, C. van de Bruck, E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, and R. C. Nunes, A consistent view of inter- acting dark energy from multiple CMB probes, JCAP 07, 032, arXiv:2303.08201 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  87. [94]

    E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and D. Wands, Exponen- tial potentials and cosmological scaling solutions, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4686 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9711068

    1998 arXiv

  88. [95]

    L. A. Escamilla, O. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino, and J. A. Vazquez, Model-independent reconstruction of the in- teracting dark energy kernel: Binned and Gaussian pro- cess, JCAP 11, 051, arXiv:2305.16290 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  89. [96]

    Benisty, S

    D. Benisty, S. Pan, D. Staicova, E. Di Valentino, and R. C. Nunes, Late-time constraints on interacting dark energy: Analysis independent of H0, rd, and MB, As- tron. Astrophys. 688, A156 (2024), arXiv:2403.00056 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Halder, J

    S. Halder, J. de Haro, T. Saha, and S. Pan, Phase space analysis of sign-shifting interacting dark energy models, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083522 (2024), arXiv:2403.01397 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Giar` e, Y

    W. Giar` e, Y. Zhai, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, R. C. Nunes, and C. van de Bruck, Tightening the reins on nonmin- imal dark sector physics: Interacting dark energy with dynamical and nondynamical equation of state, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063527 (2024), arXiv:2404.02110 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M. A. Sabogal, R. C. Nunes, and E. Di Valentino, Interacting Dark Energy after DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 251003 (2024), arXiv:2404.15232 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  93. [100]

    Aboubrahim and P

    A. Aboubrahim and P. Nath, Interacting ultralight dark matter and dark energy and fits to cosmologi- cal data in a field theory approach, JCAP 09, 076, arXiv:2406.19284 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  94. [101]

    M. A. Sabogal, E. Silva, R. C. Nunes, S. Kumar, E. Di Valentino, and W. Giar` e, Quantifying the S8 tension and evidence for interacting dark energy from redshift-space distortion measurements, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123508 (2024), arXiv:2408.12403 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  95. [102]

    Ghedini, R

    P. Ghedini, R. Hajjar, and O. Mena, Redshift-space distortions corner interacting dark energy, Phys. Dark Univ. 46, 101671 (2024), arXiv:2409.02700 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Paliathanasis, K

    A. Paliathanasis, K. Duffy, A. Halder, and A. Abebe, Compartmentalization and coexistence in the dark sec- tor of the universe, Phys. Dark Univ. 47, 101750 (2025), arXiv:2409.05348 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Aboubrahim and P

    A. Aboubrahim and P. Nath, Transmutation of in- teracting quintessence in the late universe (2024), arXiv:2411.11177 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Y. L. Bolotin, A. Kostenko, O. A. Lemets, and D. A. Yerokhin, Cosmological Evolution With Interaction Be- tween Dark Energy And Dark Matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1530007 (2014), arXiv:1310.0085 [astro- ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  99. [107]

    B. Wang, E. Abdalla, F. Atrio-Barandela, and D. Pavon, Dark Matter and Dark Energy Interactions: Theoretical Challenges, Cosmological Implications and Observational Signatures, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79, 096901 (2016), arXiv:1603.08299 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  100. [108]

    A. P. Billyard and A. A. Coley, Interactions in scalar field cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 61, 083503 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9908224

    2000 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Y. Gong, A. Wang, and Y.-Z. Zhang, Exact scaling so- lutions and fixed points for general scalar field, Phys. Lett. B 636, 286 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0603050

    2006 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Chen and Y

    X.-m. Chen and Y. Gong, Fixed points in interact- ing dark energy models, Phys. Lett. B 675, 9 (2009), arXiv:0811.1698 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Chen, Y.-g

    X.-m. Chen, Y.-g. Gong, and E. N. Saridakis, Phase- space analysis of interacting phantom cosmology, JCAP 04, 001, arXiv:0812.1117 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  104. [112]

    C. G. Boehmer, G. Caldera-Cabral, R. Lazkoz, and R. Maartens, Dynamics of dark energy with a cou- 26 pling to dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 78, 023505 (2008), arXiv:0801.1565 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Karwan, The Coincidence Problem and Inter- acting Holographic Dark Energy, JCAP 05, 011, arXiv:0801.1755 [astro-ph]

    K. Karwan, The Coincidence Problem and Inter- acting Holographic Dark Energy, JCAP 05, 011, arXiv:0801.1755 [astro-ph]

    arXiv

  106. [114]

    Caldera-Cabral, R

    G. Caldera-Cabral, R. Maartens, and L. A. Urena- Lopez, Dynamics of interacting dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 79, 063518 (2009), arXiv:0812.1827 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  107. [115]

    G. Leon, Y. Leyva, E. N. Saridakis, O. Martin, and R. Cardenas, Falsifying Field-based Dark Energy Mod- els (2009), arXiv:0912.0542 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Leon and E

    G. Leon and E. N. Saridakis, Phantom dark energy with varying-mass dark matter particles: acceleration and cosmic coincidence problem, Phys. Lett. B 693, 1 (2010), arXiv:0904.1577 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  109. [117]

    C. Xu, E. N. Saridakis, and G. Leon, Phase-Space analysis of Teleparallel Dark Energy, JCAP 07, 005, arXiv:1202.3781 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  110. [118]

    Leon and E

    G. Leon and E. N. Saridakis, Dynamical analysis of generalized Galileon cosmology, JCAP 03, 025, arXiv:1211.3088 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  111. [119]

    Avelino, Y

    A. Avelino, Y. Leyva, and L. A. Urena-Lopez, Interact- ing viscous dark fluids, Phys. Rev. D 88, 123004 (2013), arXiv:1306.3270 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  112. [120]

    C. G. Boehmer, N. Tamanini, and M. Wright, Inter- acting quintessence from a variational approach Part I: algebraic couplings, Phys. Rev. D 91, 123002 (2015), arXiv:1501.06540 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  113. [121]

    C. G. Boehmer, N. Tamanini, and M. Wright, Interact- ing quintessence from a variational approach Part II: derivative couplings, Phys. Rev. D 91, 123003 (2015), arXiv:1502.04030 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  114. [122]

    S. K. Biswas and S. Chakraborty, Dynamical sys- tems analysis of an interacting dark energy model in the brane scenario, Gen. Rel. Grav. 47, 22 (2015), arXiv:1502.06913 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  115. [123]

    C. R. Fadragas, G. Leon, and E. N. Saridakis, Dynami- cal analysis of anisotropic scalar-field cosmologies for a wide range of potentials, Class. Quant. Grav.31, 075018 (2014), arXiv:1308.1658 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  116. [124]

    S. K. Biswas and S. Chakraborty, Interacting Dark Energy in f (T ) cosmology : A Dynamical System analysis, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1550046 (2015), arXiv:1504.02431 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Mahata and S

    N. Mahata and S. Chakraborty, A dynamical system analysis of holographic dark energy models with differ- ent IR cutoff, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30, 1550134 (2015), arXiv:1511.07955 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Banerjee and N

    N. Banerjee and N. Roy, Stability analysis of a holo- graphic dark energy model, Gen. Rel. Grav. 47, 92 (2015)

    2015

  119. [127]

    Paliathanasis, M

    A. Paliathanasis, M. Tsamparlis, S. Basilakos, and J. D. Barrow, Dynamical analysis in scalar field cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 91, 123535 (2015), arXiv:1503.05750 [gr- qc]

    2015 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Paliathanasis, M

    A. Paliathanasis, M. Tsamparlis, S. Basilakos, and J. D. Barrow, Classical and Quantum Solutions in Brans- Dicke Cosmology with a Perfect Fluid, Phys. Rev. D 93, 043528 (2016), arXiv:1511.00439 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Singh and P

    S. Singh and P. Singh, It’s a dark, dark world: Back- ground evolution of interacting ϕCDM models be- yond simple exponential potentials, JCAP 05, 017, arXiv:1507.01535 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  122. [130]

    Dutta, W

    J. Dutta, W. Khyllep, and N. Tamanini, Scalar-Fluid interacting dark energy: cosmological dynamics beyond the exponential potential, Phys. Rev. D 95, 023515 (2017), arXiv:1701.00744 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Carneiro and H

    S. Carneiro and H. A. Borges, Dynamical system anal- ysis of interacting models, Gen. Rel. Grav. 50, 129 (2018), arXiv:1704.07825 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  124. [132]

    S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, and P. V. Tretyakov, Phase space analysis of the accelerating multifluid Universe, Phys. Rev. D 96, 044022 (2017), arXiv:1707.08661 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Zonunmawia, W

    H. Zonunmawia, W. Khyllep, N. Roy, J. Dutta, and N. Tamanini, Extended Phase Space Analysis of Inter- acting Dark Energy Models in Loop Quantum Cosmol- ogy, Phys. Rev. D 96, 083527 (2017), arXiv:1708.07716 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Bahamonde, C

    S. Bahamonde, C. G. B¨ ohmer, S. Carloni, E. J. Copeland, W. Fang, and N. Tamanini, Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: dark energy and modified gravity, Phys. Rept. 775-777, 1 (2018), arXiv:1712.03107 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  127. [135]

    S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, Dynamical Sys- tems Perspective of Cosmological Finite-time Singulari- ties in f (R) Gravity and Interacting Multifluid Cosmol- ogy, Phys. Rev. D 98, 024013 (2018), arXiv:1806.07295 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Paliathanasis, S

    A. Paliathanasis, S. Pan, and W. Yang, Dynamics of nonlinear interacting dark energy models, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28, 1950161 (2019), arXiv:1903.02370 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Hern´ andez-Almada, M

    A. Hern´ andez-Almada, M. A. Garc ´ ıa-Aspeitia, J. Maga˜ na, and V. Motta, Stability analysis and constraints on interacting viscous cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063516 (2020), arXiv:2001.08667 [astro- ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  130. [138]

    P. M. S´ a, Triple unification of inflation, dark energy, and dark matter in two-scalar-field cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 102, 103519 (2020), arXiv:2007.07109 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Chakraborty, S

    S. Chakraborty, S. Mishra, and S. Chakraborty, A dy- namical system analysis of cosmic evolution with cou- pled phantom dark energy with dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31, 2150129 (2022), arXiv:2011.09842 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Paliathanasis, G

    A. Paliathanasis, G. Leon, W. Khyllep, J. Dutta, and S. Pan, Interacting quintessence in light of gen- eralized uncertainty principle: cosmological perturba- tions and dynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 607 (2021), arXiv:2104.06097 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  133. [141]

    P. M. S´ a, Late-time evolution of the Universe within a two-scalar-field cosmological model, Phys. Rev. D 103, 123517 (2021), arXiv:2103.01693 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Samart, B

    D. Samart, B. Silasan, and P. Channuie, Cosmological dynamics of interacting dark energy and dark matter in viable models of f(R) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063517 (2021), arXiv:2104.12687 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Arevalo and A

    F. Arevalo and A. Cid, Dynamics and statefinder analysis of a class of sign-changeable interacting dark energy scenarios, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 946 (2022), arXiv:2202.05130 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Hussain, A

    S. Hussain, A. Chatterjee, and K. Bhattacharya, Dy- namical stability in models where dark matter and dark energy are nonminimally coupled to curvature, Phys. Rev. D 108, 103502 (2023), arXiv:2305.19062 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  137. [145]

    P. M. S´ a, Coupled Quintessence Inspired by Warm Infla- tion, Universe 10, 324 (2024), arXiv:2312.09171 [gr-qc]. 27

    2024 arXiv

  138. [146]

    P. Saha, D. Dey, and K. Bhattacharya, Gravitational collapse of matter in the presence of nonminimally cou- pled quintessence and phantomlike scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104023 (2024), arXiv:2401.11957 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Halder, S

    S. Halder, S. Pan, P. M. S´ a, and T. Saha, Coupled phan- tom cosmological model motivated by the warm infla- tionary paradigm, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063529 (2024), arXiv:2407.15804 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  140. [148]

    R. R. Caldwell, A Phantom menace?, Phys. Lett. B545, 23 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/9908168

    2002 arXiv

  141. [149]

    M. P. Dabrowski, T. Stachowiak, and M. Szydlowski, Phantom cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D 68, 103519 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0307128

    2003 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Singh, M

    P. Singh, M. Sami, and N. Dadhich, Cosmological dy- namics of phantom field, Phys. Rev. D 68, 023522 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0305110

    2003 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and S. Tsujikawa, Proper- ties of singularities in (phantom) dark energy universe, Phys. Rev. D 71, 063004 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0501025

    2005 arXiv

  144. [152]

    I. Y. Aref’eva, A. S. Koshelev, and S. Y. Vernov, Stringy dark energy model with cold dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 628, 1 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505605

    2005 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Capozziello, S

    S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Unified phantom cosmology: Inflation, dark energy and dark matter under the same standard, Phys. Lett. B 632, 597 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0507182

    2006 arXiv

  146. [154]

    E. N. Saridakis, Theoretical Limits on the Equation-of- State Parameter of Phantom Cosmology, Phys. Lett. B 676, 7 (2009), arXiv:0811.1333 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Y.-F. Cai, E. N. Saridakis, M. R. Setare, and J.-Q. Xia, Quintom Cosmology: Theoretical implications and ob- servations, Phys. Rept. 493, 1 (2010), arXiv:0909.2776 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  148. [156]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Conditions for the cos- mological viability of the most general scalar-tensor the- ories and their applications to extended Galileon dark energy models, JCAP 02, 007, arXiv:1110.3878 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  149. [157]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Quantum de Sitter cos- mology and phantom matter, Phys. Lett. B 562, 147 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0303117

    2003 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Effective equation of state and energy conditions in phantom / tachyon inflationary cosmology perturbed by quantum effects, Phys. Lett. B 571, 1 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0306212

    2003 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Valiviita, E

    J. Valiviita, E. Majerotto, and R. Maartens, Instability in interacting dark energy and dark matter fluids, JCAP 07, 020, arXiv:0804.0232 [astro-ph]

    arXiv

  152. [160]

    Shafieloo, D

    A. Shafieloo, D. K. Hazra, V. Sahni, and A. A. Starobin- sky, Metastable Dark Energy with Radioactive-like De- cay, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 473, 2760 (2018), arXiv:1610.05192 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  153. [161]

    X. Li, A. Shafieloo, V. Sahni, and A. A. Starobinsky, Revisiting Metastable Dark Energy and Tensions in the Estimation of Cosmological Parameters, Astrophys. J. 887, 153 (2019), arXiv:1904.03790 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  154. [162]

    Elizalde, S

    E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Late-time cosmology in (phantom) scalar-tensor theory: Dark en- ergy and the cosmic speed-up, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043539 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0405034

    2004 arXiv

  155. [163]

    Basilakos, M

    S. Basilakos, M. Tsamparlis, and A. Paliathanasis, Us- ing the Noether symmetry approach to probe the na- ture of dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 83, 103512 (2011), arXiv:1104.2980 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  156. [164]

    V. R. Ivanov, S. V. Ketov, E. O. Pozdeeva, and S. Y. Vernov, Analytic extensions of Starobinsky model of in- flation, JCAP 03 (03), 058, arXiv:2111.09058 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  157. [165]

    Sebastiani, G

    L. Sebastiani, G. Cognola, R. Myrzakulov, S. D. Odintsov, and S. Zerbini, Nearly Starobinsky inflation from modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D 89, 023518 (2014), arXiv:1311.0744 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  158. [166]

    Shahalam, S

    M. Shahalam, S. D. Pathak, S. Li, R. Myrzakulov, and A. Wang, Dynamics of coupled phantom and tachyon fields, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 686 (2017), arXiv:1702.04720 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  159. [167]

    Dumortier, J

    F. Dumortier, J. Llibre, and J. C. Art´ es, Qualitative theory of planar differential systems , Vol. 2 (Springer, 2006)

    2006

  160. [168]

    Perko, Differential equations and dynamical systems , Vol

    L. Perko, Differential equations and dynamical systems , Vol. 7 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  161. [169]

    J. D. Meiss, Differential dynamical systems (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2007)

    2007

  162. [170]

    Khyllep, J

    W. Khyllep, J. Dutta, S. Basilakos, and E. N. Sari- dakis, Background evolution and growth of structures in interacting dark energy scenarios through dynami- cal system analysis, Phys. Rev. D 105, 043511 (2022), arXiv:2111.01268 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.