Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 7 cited by

TryOffDiff: Virtual-Try-Off via High-Fidelity Garment Reconstruction using Diffusion Models

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read TryOffDiff turns a photo of a clothed person into a clean, catalog-style garment image, outperforming all baselines it was tested against.

desk verdict Solid new task and benchmark with an honest method, but the 'standardized garment' target is assumed unique and the abstract overstates the Dress Code results. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18350 v2 pith:KOIMPAQK submitted 2024-11-27 cs.CV cs.AI

Riza Velioglu , Petra Bevandic , Robin Chan , Barbara Hammer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords virtualtry-offgarmentreconstructiondiffusionmodelsimageconditioningSigLIPDISTSVITON-HDDressCode
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces Virtual Try-Off (VTOFF), the task of turning a single photo of a clothed person into a clean, standardized garment image of the kind used in e-commerce catalogs. It proposes TryOffDiff, a Stable Diffusion model whose text conditioning is replaced by image features from a SigLIP encoder, so the denoising process is guided by the visual details of the person's garment. On VITON-HD and Dress Code, the method reports better scores than adapted virtual try-on and pose-transfer baselines on every metric, including a 7.9-point improvement over the strongest baseline on the perceptual DISTS score. The paper also argues that SSIM and its variants are poor measures of garment reconstruction quality and that DISTS should be used instead. A sympathetic reader would take away that high-fidelity garment extraction from a single photo is feasible with a straightforward diffusion adaptation.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is image-conditioned latent diffusion: SigLIP-B/16-512 extracts a sequence of 1024 visual tokens, a linear layer plus layer normalization reduces them to 77 embeddings, and those embeddings replace text embeddings as the keys and values in the cross-attention layers of the denoising U-Net, while the SigLIP encoder and the VAE remain frozen. This lets a pretrained text-to-image diffusion model be repurposed for image-guided garment reconstruction without architectural changes. The second piece of machinery is the DISTS metric, which combines VGG-based structural and textural similarity and is used as the primary evaluation measure because SSIM fails to penalize color distortions and missing details.

What would settle it

Generate or collect a set of person photos for which two different canonical garment images are both plausible (e.g., the same garment photographed in different standard poses or with different acceptable fittings), then run TryOffDiff and ask human raters which output matches the garment's true appearance. If a substantial share of raters prefer an output that is not the dataset's ground truth, or if the DISTS distance between the two plausible targets is comparable to the model's error, the claim that the task has a well-defined evaluation target is undercut.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

TryOffDiff claims that a latent diffusion model can reconstruct canonical garment shapes, textures, patterns, logos, and occluded regions from a single clothed-person image by conditioning the denoising U-Net on the full token sequence of a SigLIP image encoder rather than on text. The authors finetune Stable Diffusion v1.4 with a linear-plus-layer-norm adapter that compresses SigLIP's 1024 tokens to the 77 slots the cross-attention layers expect, and they report that this outperforms adapted pose transfer, view synthesis, and virtual try-on baselines on all full-reference and no-reference metrics. On VITON-HD-test, TryOffDiff reaches a DISTS of 20.3 versus 28.2 for CatVTON; in cross-dataset evaluation, a model trained on Dress Code and tested on VITON-HD still beats every VITON-HD baseline. The authors also show that SSIM ranks clearly distorted images above perceptually faithful ones, and present DISTS as the more reliable evaluation tool.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the dataset pair (person photo, clean garment image) has a single correct 'try-off' target, so reconstruction quality can be measured by comparing the generated image with that one ground truth; if several canonical garments are equally valid, the reported scores measure agreement with a dataset-specific choice rather than garment fidelity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported numbers hold, VTOFF becomes a practical way to generate catalog-ready garment images from customer or street photos, reducing the need for studio product photography.
  • VTOFF gives generative model evaluation a well-defined target image, so reconstruction fidelity can be measured directly instead of relying on distribution-level metrics like FID.
  • The cross-dataset results imply the approach transfers across pose and domain shifts (full-body to half-body), which matters for real-world deployment.
  • The DISTS finding suggests that existing VTON evaluations using SSIM may be overstating quality, and that perceptual structure-texture metrics should become standard.
  • VTOFF and VTON form a cycle, so a try-off model could be used to synthesize training data or impose consistency losses for try-on models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same conditioning recipe could extend to other object classes with standardized views, such as shoes, bags, or furniture, provided paired single-object/canonical-image data are available.
  • The 77-token bottleneck is likely why the paper notes difficulty with intricate logos and text; increasing token capacity or using a higher-resolution image encoder might close that gap.
  • A human perceptual study comparing TryOffDiff output, ground truth, and alternative canonical renderings would directly test whether DISTS's ranking matches human preference, which the paper does not include.
  • If VTOFF outputs are used to train or evaluate try-on models, artifacts in reconstruction could propagate; reporting failure cases on complex patterns is a step toward bounding that.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Virtual Try-Off (VTOFF), a task of generating a standardized garment image from a single photo of a clothed person, and proposes TryOffDiff, a Stable Diffusion model conditioned by SigLIP image embeddings through cross-attention adapters. Experiments on VITON-HD and Dress Code upper-body garments report that TryOffDiff outperforms adapted VTON, pose-transfer, and image-conditioning baselines on VITON-HD, with ablations supporting the SigLIP encoder, adapter, and pretrained U-Net initialization. The paper also argues that conventional metrics like SSIM are unsuitable for VTOFF and recommends DISTS as the primary metric.

Significance. The VTOFF task is timely and relevant to e-commerce and generative-model evaluation, and the paper makes a useful contribution by formalizing the task, cleaning the VITON-HD dataset, and releasing code and models. The architecture is simple and the ablation study is informative. However, the central empirical claims are weakened by two gaps: no baseline numbers are reported on Dress Code despite the abstract claiming superiority there, and the evaluation protocol assumes a unique canonical garment target without human validation. The relative comparison on VITON-HD is internally consistent and the presented model is plausible, but the absolute 'high-fidelity reconstruction' and metric-reliability claims need stronger support.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; §4 Quantitative Results; Table 2] The abstract and §4 state that experiments on Dress Code show TryOffDiff outperforms baselines, but Table 2 contains only TryOffDiff rows, and the text says baselines were not evaluated on Dress Code due to poor initial performance. This does not support the claim. Please add Dress Code baseline results or revise the abstract, introduction, and conclusion to restrict the outperformance claim to VITON-HD.
  2. [§3.1 Problem Formulation; evaluation protocol] The paper defines VTOFF as generating a standardized garment image G and then trains and evaluates against the dataset's G as if it were the unique target. The same physical garment can be canonically presented in different front-view rotations, sleeve states, tuck states, or stretch, and occluded back/side regions are underdetermined. No human-rater study, inter-rater agreement, or multi-target analysis is provided. Therefore, the headline numbers (e.g., DISTS 20.3 vs. 28.2) measure fit to one dataset-specific canonicalization; the unqualified 'high-fidelity reconstruction' claim requires validation that the target is indeed the natural unique canonical garment.
  3. [§3.1 Performance Measures; Fig. 3; Tab. 4] The paper's argument that DISTS is more reliable than SSIM for VTOFF is based on a small set of hand-picked degradation examples and on metric values themselves, not on human perceptual judgments. Without a user study that collects ground-truth similarity ratings for VTOFF outputs, the claim that SSIM 'inadequately reflects reconstruction quality' and that DISTS is 'reliable' is a conjecture. At minimum, report confidence intervals and statistical significance for the metric differences in Tables 1 and 2.
  4. [§4 Baseline Approaches; App. C] The adapted baselines appear to be placed at a disadvantage relative to TryOffDiff: CatVTON is given a plain white reference image and a handcrafted mask, IP-Adapter is initialized from a mask-like image, and ViscoNet is given masked conditioning without fine-tuning, whereas TryOffDiff is trained on the target task. This makes it difficult to separate task-adaptation quality from method quality. Please provide an oracle/upper-bound or a fine-tuned baseline comparison, or explicitly discuss this limitation as a bound on the strength of the comparative claims.
minor comments (5)
  1. [App. C] Appendix C contains the typo 'architecturla' in the IP-Adapter description; please correct it.
  2. [Tables 1 and 2] The abbreviation FDCLIP is used without definition in the text; please clarify that it is a CLIP-based Fréchet distance.
  3. [App. C] The SAM point-prompt selection used in baseline post-processing is not specified; please describe it for reproducibility.
  4. [References] References [21] (DressCode, a text-to-garment method) and [30] (Dress Code dataset) are easily confused; please consider introducing explicit notational or stylistic distinctions.
  5. [Fig. 3 and Tab. 4] The selection criteria for the hand-picked distortion cases in Figure 3 are not stated; a brief description of how representative cases were chosen would strengthen the metric-suitability discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: TryOffDiff is an empirical supervised model evaluated with external fixed metrics; no claim reduces to its own input by construction.

full rationale

The paper contains no analytic derivation whose constants are fitted to the predicted quantity. TryOffDiff is trained with the standard diffusion MSE objective on external paired datasets (VITON-HD, Dress Code) and evaluated on held-out test splits with fixed reference metrics (SSIM, LPIPS, FID, KID, DISTS). The model never optimizes DISTS or any evaluation metric directly, so the reported improvements (e.g., DISTS 20.3 vs. CatVTON 28.2) are empirical outcomes, not forced by construction. The task definition in Sec. 3.1, where VTOFF targets the dataset garment image G, is a supervised training/evaluation protocol, not a circular derivation: G is external ground truth, not a function of the model's predictions. The choice of DISTS as the primary metric is motivated by prior work and by illustrative experiments (Fig. 3, Tab. 4), and although those illustrations are hand-picked and lack human-rater validation, that is a validity concern, not circularity. The only self-citation is [52], used as an off-the-shelf fashion parser for baseline preprocessing (App. C); it is not load-bearing for the central claim, since the same preprocessing is applied to baselines and does not determine TryOffDiff's scores. In sum, the central performance claims are self-contained empirical comparisons against external benchmarks, with no fitted input renamed as a prediction and no self-citation chain supporting the main result.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper makes an empirical claim, so the free parameters are hand-chosen hyperparameters and borrowed pretrained components, not fitted constants in a derivation. The axioms are the transferability of Stable Diffusion and SigLIP, the dataset operationalization, and the metric choice. No new physical or model-level entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Guidance scale = 2.0
    Inference-time classifier-free guidance scale chosen by the authors in App. B; not swept or justified with sensitivity analysis.
  • Inference steps = 20
    Number of denoising steps with the EulerDiscrete scheduler at inference; affects speed and output quality.
  • Conditioning token count = 77
    Reduces SigLIP's 1024 tokens to 77 to match Stable Diffusion's cross-attention layout; a hand-chosen architectural constraint.
  • Adapter output dimensionality = 768
    Matches the Stable Diffusion text-embedding channel size so pretrained cross-attention weights can be reused.
  • Training budget = 150k iterations, batch 16, lr 1e-4
    Training schedule on one A40; no early-stopping criterion or multiple seeds reported, so final metrics depend on this budget.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Stable Diffusion v1.4 provides a strong generative prior that can be fine-tuned for garment reconstruction.
    The method builds on the pretrained U-Net and VAE; success depends on this prior transferring to the garment domain (Sec. 3.2).
  • domain assumption SigLIP-B/16-512 features encode enough fine-grained spatial detail to condition high-fidelity garment generation.
    The paper relies on SigLIP visual tokens, including spatial layout, to reconstruct patterns and logos (Sec. 3.2 and ablation Tab. 3).
  • domain assumption VITON-HD and Dress Code paired images provide a valid ground-truth operationalization of VTOFF.
    Training and all metrics use the dataset's clean garment image G as the target; ambiguity in canonical pose or garment form is not modeled (Sec. 3.1 and App. A).
  • domain assumption DISTS is a reliable proxy for human perceptual fidelity in the VTOFF setting.
    DISTS is adopted as the primary metric based on examples and prior validation; no human study is run in this paper (Sec. 3.1, Fig. 3, Tab. 4).
  • standard math Standard diffusion training and cross-attention machinery are assumed correct.
    No new mathematical proof is given; the method relies on standard latent diffusion and attention operations (Sec. 3.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of TryOffDiff: Virtual-Try-Off via High-Fidelity Garment Reconstruction using Diffusion Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KOIMPAQK

@misc{pith2026241118350,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: TryOffDiff: Virtual-Try-Off via High-Fidelity Garment Reconstruction using Diffusion Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KOIMPAQK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18350}
}
read the original abstract

This paper introduces Virtual Try-Off (VTOFF), a novel task generating standardized garment images from single photos of clothed individuals. Unlike Virtual Try-On (VTON), which digitally dresses models, VTOFF extracts canonical garment images, demanding precise reconstruction of shape, texture, and complex patterns, enabling robust evaluation of generative model fidelity. We propose TryOffDiff, adapting Stable Diffusion with SigLIP-based visual conditioning to deliver high-fidelity reconstructions. Experiments on VITON-HD and Dress Code datasets show that TryOffDiff outperforms adapted pose transfer and VTON baselines. We observe that traditional metrics such as SSIM inadequately reflect reconstruction quality, prompting our use of DISTS for reliable assessment. Our findings highlight VTOFF's potential to improve e-commerce product imagery, advance generative model evaluation, and guide future research on high-fidelity reconstruction. Demo, code, and models are available at: https://rizavelioglu.github.io/tryoffdiff

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18350 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. VTON vs. VTOFF. Left: Virtual Try-On generates a dressed per￾son from a garment image and a masked reference. Right: Virtual Try-Off re￾constructs a canonical garment form from a photo of a clothed person. The two tasks form a cycle, where one’s out￾put can serve as other’s input. VTOFF addresses critical needs across multi￾ple domains. In e-commerce, it offers a practi￾cal solution for generating catalog-ready garm… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Metric suitability for VTON and VTOFF (SSIM↑ / DISTS↓). A reference image is compared to: (a) masked-out garment, (b) hue-jittered, (c) patch-wise color-jittered image; and a garment image is compared to: (d) plain white, (e) slightly rotated, (f) randomly posterized image. SSIM fails to penalize distortions, while DISTS better reflects judgment. for training and evaluation, where I is an image of a clothed person (… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. TryOffDiff architecture. SigLIP [61] extracts features from a reference image, processed by adapter modules and embedded into pretrained Stable Diffusion v1.4 [35] by replacing text features in cross-attention layers, enabling image-guided generation. Joint training of adapter layers and diffusion model enables effective garment transformation. are integrated into the denoising U-Net via cross-attention, with keys K… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Adapting baselines for VTOFF. (a) GAN-Pose [36] uses pose transfer; (b) Vis￾coNet [6] employs view synthesis; (c) OOTDiffusion [58] and (d) CatVTON [9] are recent virtual try-on methods; (e) IP-Adapter [59] is a general-purpose image-conditioned baseline. functionality…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison on VITON-HD-test. In comparison to the baseline ap￾proaches, TryOffDiff is capable of generating garment images with accurate structural details as well as fine textural details. 5 Conclusion In this paper, we introduced virtual try-off (VTOFF), …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Metric suitability for VTOFF (SSIM↑ / DISTS↓). Each pair displays ground truth (left) and predictions (right) from two arbitrary models (a-c vs. d-f). High SSIM scores obscure poor quality in the top row, while DISTS effectively highlights variations, better reflecting…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative comparison between baselines and TryOffDiff on VITON-HD. TryOffDiff more accurately reconstructs both structural and textural garment details com￾pared to baseline methods [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Qualitative results from TryOffDiff on Dress Code (upper-body garments) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. UniVVT: A Unified End-to-End Framework for High-Fidelity Video Virtual Try-on

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UniVVT reports state-of-the-art video and image virtual try-on by conditioning a diffusion video generator on task tokens from a multimodal language model, with no masks, poses, or warping at inference.

  2. NI-Tex: Non-isometric Image-based Garment Texture Generation

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A training framework that makes image-to-garment texture transfer robust to pose and topology mismatch, using simulated garment videos, AI image editing, and uncertainty-guided multi-view baking.

  3. FW-VTON: Flattening-and-Warping for Person-to-Person Virtual Try-on

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FW-VTON reports state-of-the-art person-to-person virtual try-on results using a flattening, warping, and integration pipeline plus a new P2P-VTON dataset.

  4. Any2AnyTryon: Leveraging Adaptive Position Embeddings for Versatile Virtual Clothing Tasks

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single DiT-based model with adaptive position embeddings performs virtual try-on, garment reconstruction, model-free try-on, and layered try-on from text and variable-size image inputs.

  5. IGR: Improving Diffusion Model for Garment Restoration from Person Image

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    IGR restores a clean garment image from a person photo using Stable Diffusion, dual extractors, attention fusion blocks, and a VITON-to-GarmRe fine-tuning strategy, beating TryOffDiff on the reported benchmarks.

  6. MFP-VTON: Enhancing Mask-Free Person-to-Person Virtual Try-On via Diffusion Transformer

    cs.CV 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A mask-free person-to-person virtual try-on model built on FLUX-Fill-dev, trained with pseudo data generated by IDM and a Focus Attention loss.

  7. TryOffAnyone: Tiled Cloth Generation from a Dressed Person

    cs.CV 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A mask-conditioned, Stable Diffusion-based model generates tiled garment images from dressed-person photos and reports best-seed metrics that improve on prior work but with a flawed evaluation protocol.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Layer normalization

    Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Layer normalization. stat, 1050:21, 2016

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Imagen 3

    Jason Baldridge, Jakob Bauer, Mukul Bhutani, Nicole Brichtova, Andrew Bunner, Kelvin Chan, et al. Imagen 3. arXiv, 2024. https://doi.org/nqr4

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Im- proving image generation with better captions

    James Betker, Gabriel Goh, Li Jing, Tim Brooks, Jianfeng Wang, Linjie Li, et al. Im- proving image generation with better captions. preprint, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Demys- tifying mmd gans

    Mikołaj Bi ´nkowski, Danica J Sutherland, Michael Arbel, and Arthur Gretton. Demys- tifying mmd gans. In ICLR, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    IQA-PyTorch: Pytorch toolbox for image quality as- sessment

    Chaofeng Chen and Jiadi Mo. IQA-PyTorch: Pytorch toolbox for image quality as- sessment. https://github.com/chaofengc/IQA-PyTorch, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Visconet: Bridging and har- monizing visual and textual conditioning for controlnet

    Soon Yau Cheong, Armin Mustafa, and Andrew Gilbert. Visconet: Bridging and har- monizing visual and textual conditioning for controlnet. In ECCVW, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Viton-hd: High- resolution virtual try-on via misalignment-aware normalization

    Seunghwan Choi, Sunghyun Park, Minsoo Lee, and Jaegul Choo. Viton-hd: High- resolution virtual try-on via misalignment-aware normalization. In CVPR, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Improving diffusion models for virtual try-on

    Yisol Choi, Sangkyung Kwak, Kyungmin Lee, Hyungwon Choi, and Jinwoo Shin. Improving diffusion models for virtual try-on. arXiv, 2024. https://doi.org/ np47

    work page 2024

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Catvton: Concatenation is all you need for virtual try-on with diffusion models

    Zheng Chong, Xiao Dong, Haoxiang Li, Shiyue Zhang, Wenqing Zhang, Xujie Zhang, Hanqing Zhao, and Xiaodan Liang. Catvton: Concatenation is all you need for virtual try-on with diffusion models. In ICLR, 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Dressing in order: Recurrent person image generation for pose transfer, virtual try-on and outfit editing

    Aiyu Cui, Daniel McKee, and Svetlana Lazebnik. Dressing in order: Recurrent person image generation for pose transfer, virtual try-on and outfit editing. In ICCV, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Image quality assessment: Unifying structure and texture similarity

    Keyan Ding, Kede Ma, Shiqi Wang, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: Unifying structure and texture similarity. IEEE TPAMI, 2020

    2020

  4. [12]

    Fw-gan: Flow-navigated warping gan for video virtual try-on

    Haoye Dong, Xiaodan Liang, Xiaohui Shen, Bowen Wu, Bing-Cheng Chen, and Jian Yin. Fw-gan: Flow-navigated warping gan for video virtual try-on. In ICCV, 2019

    2019

  5. [13]

    Leveraging the power of images in managing product return rates

    Daria Dzyabura, Siham El Kihal, John R Hauser, and Marat Ibragimov. Leveraging the power of images in managing product return rates. Mark. Sci., 2023. VELIOGLU ET AL. : TRYOFFDIFF 11

    2023

  6. [14]

    Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis

    Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas Müller, Harry Saini, et al. Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. In ICML, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    A versatile benchmark for detection, pose estimation, segmentation and re- identification of clothing images

    Yuying Ge, Ruimao Zhang, Lingyun Wu, Xiaogang Wang, Xiaoou Tang, and Ping Luo. A versatile benchmark for detection, pose estimation, segmentation and re- identification of clothing images. In CVPR, 2019

    2019

  8. [16]

    Parser-free virtual try-on via distilling appearance flows

    Yuying Ge, Yibing Song, Ruimao Zhang, Chongjian Ge, Wei Liu, and Ping Luo. Parser-free virtual try-on via distilling appearance flows. In CVPR, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Controllable person image synthesis with pose-constrained latent diffusion

    Xiao Han, Xiatian Zhu, Jiankang Deng, Yi-Zhe Song, and Tao Xiang. Controllable person image synthesis with pose-constrained latent diffusion. In ICCV, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Viton: An image- based virtual try-on network

    Xintong Han, Zuxuan Wu, Zhe Wu, Ruichi Yu, and Larry S Davis. Viton: An image- based virtual try-on network. In CVPR, 2018

    2018

  11. [19]

    Clothflow: A flow- based model for clothed person generation

    Xintong Han, Xiaojun Hu, Weilin Huang, and Matthew R Scott. Clothflow: A flow- based model for clothed person generation. In CVPR, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    The power of generative mar- keting: Can generative ai create superhuman visual marketing content? Int

    Jochen Hartmann, Yannick Exner, and Samuel Domdey. The power of generative mar- keting: Can generative ai create superhuman visual marketing content? Int. J. Res. Mark., 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Dresscode: Autoregressively sewing and generating garments from text guidance

    Kai He, Kaixin Yao, Qixuan Zhang, Jingyi Yu, Lingjie Liu, and Lan Xu. Dresscode: Autoregressively sewing and generating garments from text guidance. TOG, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. In NeurIPS, 2017

    2017

  15. [23]

    Nvist: In the wild new view synthesis from a single image with transformers

    Wonbong Jang and Lourdes Agapito. Nvist: In the wild new view synthesis from a single image with transformers. In CVPR, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    The conditional analogy gan: Swapping fashion articles on people images

    Nikolay Jetchev and Urs Bergmann. The conditional analogy gan: Swapping fashion articles on people images. In ICCVW, 2017

    2017

  17. [25]

    Dreampose: Fashion image-to-video synthesis via stable diffusion

    Johanna Karras, Aleksander Holynski, Ting-Chun Wang, and Ira Kemelmacher- Shlizerman. Dreampose: Fashion image-to-video synthesis via stable diffusion. In ICCV, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models

    Tero Karras, Miika Aittala, Timo Aila, and Samuli Laine. Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models. In NeurIPS, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Seg- ment anything

    Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer Whitehead, Alexander C Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, et al. Seg- ment anything. In ICCV, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Deep convolutional inverse graphics network

    Tejas D Kulkarni, William F Whitney, Pushmeet Kohli, and Josh Tenenbaum. Deep convolutional inverse graphics network. In NeurIPS, 2015

    2015

  21. [29]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization

    Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In ICLR, 2019. 12 VELIOGLU ET AL. : TRYOFFDIFF

    2019

  22. [30]

    Dress code: High-resolution multi-category virtual try-on

    Davide Morelli, Matteo Fincato, Marcella Cornia, Federico Landi, Fabio Cesari, and Rita Cucchiara. Dress code: High-resolution multi-category virtual try-on. In CVPR, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models

    Chong Mou, Xintao Wang, Liangbin Xie, Yanze Wu, Jian Zhang, Zhongang Qi, and Ying Shan. T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models. In AAAI, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    On aliased resizing and surprising subtleties in gan evaluation

    Gaurav Parmar, Richard Zhang, and Jun-Yan Zhu. On aliased resizing and surprising subtleties in gan evaluation. In CVPR, 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Zero-shot image-to-image translation

    Gaurav Parmar, Krishna Kumar Singh, Richard Zhang, Yijun Li, Jingwan Lu, and Jun- Yan Zhu. Zero-shot image-to-image translation. In SIGGRAPH, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In ICML, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Om- mer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In CVPR, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Multi-scale attention guided pose transfer

    Prasun Roy, Saumik Bhattacharya, Subhankar Ghosh, and Umapada Pal. Multi-scale attention guided pose transfer. PR, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Palette: Image-to-image diffusion models

    Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Huiwen Chang, Chris Lee, Jonathan Ho, Tim Sali- mans, et al. Palette: Image-to-image diffusion models. In SIGGRAPH, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Image super-resolution via iterative refinement

    Chitwan Saharia, Jonathan Ho, William Chan, Tim Salimans, David J Fleet, and Mo- hammad Norouzi. Image super-resolution via iterative refinement. IEEE TPAMI, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Advancing pose- guided image synthesis with progressive conditional diffusion models

    Fei Shen, Hu Ye, Jun Zhang, Cong Wang, Xiao Han, and Wei Yang. Advancing pose- guided image synthesis with progressive conditional diffusion models. In ICLR, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Mfp-vton: Enhancing mask- free person-to-person virtual try-on via diffusion transformer

    Le Shen, Yanting Kang, Rong Huang, and Zhijie Wang. Mfp-vton: Enhancing mask- free person-to-person virtual try-on via diffusion transformer. arXiv, 2025. https: //doi.org/pnd8

    2025

  33. [41]

    Very deep convolutional networks for large- scale image recognition

    Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large- scale image recognition. In ICLR, 2015

    2015

  34. [42]

    Exposing flaws of generative model evaluation metrics and their unfair treatment of diffusion models

    George Stein, Jesse Cresswell, Rasa Hosseinzadeh, Yi Sui, Brendan Ross, Valentin Villecroze, Zhaoyan Liu, Anthony L Caterini, Eric Taylor, and Gabriel Loaiza-Ganem. Exposing flaws of generative model evaluation metrics and their unfair treatment of diffusion models. In NeurIPS, 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Multi-view to novel view: Synthesizing novel views with self-learned confidence

    Shao-Hua Sun, Minyoung Huh, Yuan-Hong Liao, Ning Zhang, and Joseph J Lim. Multi-view to novel view: Synthesizing novel views with self-learned confidence. In ECCV, 2018

    2018

  36. [44]

    Sgdiff: A style guided diffusion model for fashion synthesis

    Zhengwentai Sun, Yanghong Zhou, Honghong He, and PY Mok. Sgdiff: A style guided diffusion model for fashion synthesis. In ACMMM, 2023. VELIOGLU ET AL. : TRYOFFDIFF 13

    2023

  37. [45]

    Going deeper with convolutions

    Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Andrew Rabinovich. Going deeper with convolutions. In CVPR, 2015

    2015

  38. [46]

    Learning a blind measure of perceptual image quality

    Huixuan Tang, Neel Joshi, and Ashish Kapoor. Learning a blind measure of perceptual image quality. In CVPR, 2011

    2011

  39. [47]

    Multi-view 3d models from single images with a convolutional network

    Maxim Tatarchenko, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Thomas Brox. Multi-view 3d models from single images with a convolutional network. In ECCV, 2016

    2016

  40. [48]

    A note on the evaluation of generative models

    Lucas Theis, Aäron van den Oord, and Matthias Bethge. A note on the evaluation of generative models. In ICLR, 2016

    2016

  41. [49]

    Tri- posr: Fast 3d object reconstruction from a single image

    Dmitry Tochilkin, David Pankratz, Zexiang Liu, Zixuan Huang, Adam Letts, Yang- guang Li, Ding Liang, Christian Laforte, Varun Jampani, and Yan-Pei Cao. Tri- posr: Fast 3d object reconstruction from a single image. arXiv, 2024. https: //doi.org/nq56

    2024

  42. [50]

    Johnson, and Mao H

    Brandon Van Der Heide, Benjamin K. Johnson, and Mao H. Vang. The effects of product photographs and reputation systems on consumer behavior and product cost on ebay. Comput. Hum. Behav., 2013

    2013

  43. [51]

    Attention is all you need

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In NeurIPS, 2017

    2017

  44. [52]

    Fashionfail: Addressing failure cases in fashion object detection and segmentation

    Riza Velioglu, Robin Chan, and Barbara Hammer. Fashionfail: Addressing failure cases in fashion object detection and segmentation. In IJCNN, 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Toward characteristic-preserving image-based virtual try-on network

    Bochao Wang, Huabin Zheng, Xiaodan Liang, Yimin Chen, Liang Lin, and Meng Yang. Toward characteristic-preserving image-based virtual try-on network. In ECCV, 2018

    2018

  46. [54]

    Fldm-vton: Faithful latent diffusion model for virtual try-on

    Chenhui Wang, Tao Chen, Zhihao Chen, Zhizhong Huang, Taoran Jiang, Qi Wang, and Hongming Shan. Fldm-vton: Faithful latent diffusion model for virtual try-on. In IJCAI, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Bovik, H.R

    Zhou Wang, A.C. Bovik, H.R. Sheikh, and E.P. Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2004

    2004

  48. [56]

    Creating the best first impression: Designing online product photos to increase sales.Decis

    Huosong Xia, Xiaoting Pan, Yanjun Zhou, and Zuopeng Justin Zhang. Creating the best first impression: Designing online product photos to increase sales.Decis. Support Syst., 2020

    2020

  49. [57]

    Towards scalable unpaired virtual try-on via patch-routed spatially- adaptive gan

    Zhenyu Xie, Zaiyu Huang, Fuwei Zhao, Haoye Dong, Michael Kampffmeyer, and Xiaodan Liang. Towards scalable unpaired virtual try-on via patch-routed spatially- adaptive gan. In NeurIPS, 2021

    2021

  50. [58]

    Ootdiffusion: Outfitting fusion based latent diffusion for controllable virtual try-on

    Yuhao Xu, Tao Gu, Weifeng Chen, and Chengcai Chen. Ootdiffusion: Outfitting fusion based latent diffusion for controllable virtual try-on. In AAAI, 2025. 14 VELIOGLU ET AL. : TRYOFFDIFF

    2025

  51. [59]

    Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models

    Hu Ye, Jun Zhang, Sibo Liu, Xiao Han, and Wei Yang. Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv, 2023. https:// doi.org/np3v

    2023

  52. [60]

    Tilegan: category-oriented attention-based high-quality tiled clothes generation from dressed person.Neural Com- put

    Wei Zeng, Mingbo Zhao, Yuan Gao, and Zhao Zhang. Tilegan: category-oriented attention-based high-quality tiled clothes generation from dressed person.Neural Com- put. Appl., 2020

    2020

  53. [61]

    Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training

    Xiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Lucas Beyer. Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training. In ICCV, 2023

    2023

  54. [62]

    Adding conditional control to text- to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text- to-image diffusion models. In ICCV, 2023

    2023

  55. [63]

    Armani: Part-level garment-text alignment for unified cross-modal fashion design

    Xujie Zhang, Yu Sha, Michael C Kampffmeyer, Zhenyu Xie, Zequn Jie, Chengwen Huang, Jianqing Peng, and Xiaodan Liang. Armani: Part-level garment-text alignment for unified cross-modal fashion design. In ACMM, 2022

    2022

  56. [64]

    Diffcloth: Diffusion based garment synthesis and manipulation via structural cross-modal semantic alignment

    Xujie Zhang, Binbin Yang, Michael C Kampffmeyer, Wenqing Zhang, Shiyue Zhang, Guansong Lu, Liang Lin, Hang Xu, and Xiaodan Liang. Diffcloth: Diffusion based garment synthesis and manipulation via structural cross-modal semantic alignment. In ICCV, 2023

    2023

  57. [65]

    Multi-view image generation from a single-view

    Bo Zhao, Xiao Wu, Zhi-Qi Cheng, Hao Liu, Zequn Jie, and Jiashi Feng. Multi-view image generation from a single-view. In ACM MM, 2018

    2018

  58. [66]

    a photo of an e-commerce 2 VELIOGLU ET AL. : TRYOFFDIFF clothing product

    Tinghui Zhou, Shubham Tulsiani, Weilun Sun, Jitendra Malik, and Alexei A Efros. View synthesis by appearance flow. In ECCV, 2016. VELIOGLU ET AL. : TRYOFFDIFF 1 TryOffDiff: Virtual-Try-Off via High-Fidelity Garment Reconstruction using Diffusion Models Supplementary Material A...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.