pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.18676 · v2 · pith:WAGF7VW6new · submitted 2024-11-27 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI· cs.LG

Embodied Red Teaming for Auditing Robotic Foundation Models

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AIcs.LG
keywords instructionsmodelschallengingsafetyteamingassessingbenchmarkscurrent
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Language-conditioned robot models have the potential to enable robots to perform a wide range of tasks based on natural language instructions. However, assessing their safety and effectiveness remains challenging because it is difficult to test all the different ways a single task can be phrased. Current benchmarks have two key limitations: they rely on a limited set of human-generated instructions, missing many challenging cases, and focus only on task performance without assessing safety, such as avoiding damage. To address these gaps, we introduce Embodied Red Teaming (ERT), a new evaluation method that generates diverse and challenging instructions to test these models. ERT uses automated red teaming techniques with Vision Language Models (VLMs) to create contextually grounded, difficult instructions. Experimental results show that state-of-the-art language-conditioned robot models fail or behave unsafely on ERT-generated instructions, underscoring the shortcomings of current benchmarks in evaluating real-world performance and safety. Code and videos are available at: https://s-karnik.github.io/embodied-red-team-project-page.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uncovering Linguistic Fragility in Vision-Language-Action Models via Diversity-Aware Red Teaming

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DAERT generates diverse adversarial instructions via a uniform policy in RL to drop VLA task success rates from 93.33% to 5.85% on benchmarks with models like π0 and OpenVLA.

  2. Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses

    cs.CR 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The survey organizes over 400 papers on embodied AI safety into a multi-level taxonomy and flags overlooked issues such as fragile multimodal fusion and unstable planning under jailbreaks.

  3. SABER: A Stealthy Agentic Black-Box Attack Framework for Vision-Language-Action Models

    cs.RO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SABER uses a trained ReAct agent to produce bounded adversarial edits to robot instructions, cutting task success by 20.6% and increasing execution length and violations on the LIBERO benchmark across six VLA models.

  4. Red-Teaming Vision-Language-Action Models via Quality Diversity Prompt Generation for Robust Robot Policies

    cs.RO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Q-DIG applies quality diversity optimization with vision-language models to generate diverse adversarial instructions that reveal VLA robot failures and enable robustness improvements via fine-tuning.

  5. Towards Auditing AI Systems in the Wild

    cs.CY 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Proposes framing auditing of deployed AI systems as continuous statistical monitoring of risk-controlled constraints like fairness and safety under uncertainty.