Testing inflation on all scales: a case study with $\alpha$-attractors

Felipe T. Falciano; Laura Iacconi; Luiz Filipe Guimar\~aes; Michael Bacchi

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 7 cited by

Testing inflation on all scales: a case study with $\alpha$-attractors

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Hybrid α-attractor inflation can pass every test and still reach LISA, according to a new all-scale study.

desk verdict A careful and mostly persuasive all-scale consistency scan of hybrid alpha-attractors, with the first peak-scale non-Gaussianity computation for this model class; the perturbativity caveat is genuine but clearly flagged, so it deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02544 v2 pith:NRLSLARN submitted 2024-12-03 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

Laura Iacconi , Michael Bacchi , Luiz Filipe Guimarães , Felipe T. Falciano This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phhep-th

keywords inflationhybridα-attractorsprimordialblackholesscalar-inducedgravitationalwavesCMBspectraldistortionsnon-GaussianityperturbativityLISA

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that an inflationary model can be tested simultaneously at CMB scales, at the smaller scales probed by $\mu$-distortions, and at the even smaller scales where primordial black holes and scalar-induced gravitational waves would form. For hybrid $\alpha$-attractors it claims that after imposing all large-scale constraints, a subset of the parameter space survives; that a fraction of these models produce a significant PBH abundance ($10^{-3} \leq f_{\mathrm{PBH}} \leq 1$); and that with a short reheating stage a fraction of those produce a LISA signal whose signal-to-noise ratio exceeds the astrophysical foreground. The step that carries the argument is the claim that the bispectrum at peak scales is local with $f_{\mathrm{NL}} \sim \mathcal{O}(0.1)$, so one-loop corrections are subdominant and the tree-level power spectrum can be used for small-scale predictions. If the paper is right, LISA has concrete, observationally consistent targets to search for, and the small-scale phenomenology of this model rests on firmer ground than most multifield scenarios.

What carries the argument

The machine in the paper is a chain of consistency tests held together by a numerical transport computation of the 2- and 3-point functions of $\zeta$, and by the identity $P_\zeta^{1\text{-loop}}/P_{\zeta,\mathrm{G}} \approx f_{\mathrm{NL}}^2 P_{\zeta,\mathrm{G}}$, which converts the measured local-type $f_{\mathrm{NL}}$ into an estimate of one-loop corrections. The paper combines this perturbativity check with a careful calibration of the CMB pivot scale including a matter-dominated reheating phase ($\Delta \tilde{N}_{\mathrm{rh}}$), a Press-Schechter compaction-function calculation of $f_{\mathrm{PBH}}$, and a computation of the induced gravitational-wave energy density, with detectability judged against the SNR of astrophysical foregrounds.

What would settle it

Compute the full one-loop correction to the scalar power spectrum at peak scales for a representative viable model, for example $\{\chi_0 = 2.347,\ d = -6.68 \times 10^{-6}\}$ at $\Delta N_{\mathrm{CMB}} = 54$; if the correction approaches the tree-level $\mathcal{P}_\zeta$, the PBH abundances and LISA detection claims change quantitatively.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that hybrid $\alpha$-attractors, restricted to the reduced plane $(\chi_0, d)$ with fixed $\{\alpha=1, \tilde{m}=0.3, \tilde{g}=0.8\}$, contain models that satisfy Planck 2018 and BICEP/Keck constraints on $n_s$, $\alpha_s$ and $r$, the COBE/FIRAS upper limit $\mu < 9 \times 10^{-5}$, and the theoretical requirement $f_{\mathrm{PBH}} \leq 1$, while still producing a scalar-induced gravitational-wave background within LISA's reach. The paper reports that non-Gaussianity at the scales of the power-spectrum peak is of local type with amplitude $f_{\mathrm{NL}} \sim 0.4$--$0.5$, weakly dependent on $\chi_0$, and that this makes non-linear corrections to the power spectrum subdominant. From the surviving region, models with short reheating ($\Delta N_{\mathrm{CMB}} = 52.5$ and $54$) can reach LISA with SNR above the astrophysical foreground, whereas no surviving model in this slice gives an Einstein Telescope signal; longer reheating shrinks the viable region and removes LISA detectability.

Load-bearing premise

The argument for using tree-level $\mathcal{P}_\zeta$ at peak scales rests on the approximate one-loop indicator $f_{\mathrm{NL}}^2 \mathcal{P}_\zeta$, which was derived for scale-invariant spectra under a local ansatz and verified in full shape for only one model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For the considered slice, longer reheating stages shrink the parameter space compatible with large-scale data, and no $f_{\mathrm{PBH}} \leq 1$ model with $\Delta N_{\mathrm{CMB}} = 50$ has SNR above the LISA astrophysical foreground.
Shorter reheating ($\Delta N_{\mathrm{CMB}} = 52.5, 54$) leaves models with $10^{-3} \leq f_{\mathrm{PBH}} \leq 1$ and LISA SNR of hundreds, for example 305.8 and 874.5 for the representative model, so a non-detection by LISA would exclude that part of the plane.
Imposing $f_{\mathrm{PBH}} \leq 1$ is a stronger constraint than the common approximate criterion $\mathcal{P}_\zeta(k_{\mathrm{peak}}) \lesssim 0.01$.
Because $f_{\mathrm{NL}}$ is small and local at peak scales, the tree-level $\mathcal{P}_\zeta$ is adequate for PBH and gravitational-wave predictions, distinguishing these models from polynomial $\alpha$-attractors where perturbativity fails.
CMB-scale non-Gaussianity is negligible ($f_{\mathrm{NL}} \sim 0.02$) and consistent with observations, so it does not further constrain the parameter space.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the one-loop estimate holds beyond the approximate indicator, hybrid $\alpha$-attractors become a rare multifield class where tree-level small-scale predictions are justified; a full one-loop computation would either cement or overturn this advantage.
Applying the same all-scale pipeline to the full multi-dimensional parameter space, or to polynomial hybrid attractors, could reshape the viable window and move peak scales toward PTA or ground-based interferometer bands where different PBH mass constraints apply.
A LISA detection would not identify the model uniquely, but it would constrain the combination of $(\chi_0, d)$ and reheating duration; the nearly power-law scaling $f_{\mathrm{NL}} \propto \chi_0^{-1.8}$ could serve as a cheap analytic proxy in future forecasts.
Models near the boundary of the surviving region generate $\mu$-distortions close to the FIRAS limit, so a future CMB spectrometer could independently probe the same window before LISA data arrive.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know this paper first for what it does well: it takes a specific two-field model, hybrid alpha-attractors, and runs it through every test that matters, from CMB tilt and running to mu-distortions, PBH overproduction, and LISA SNR with foreground subtraction. The genuinely new result is the first calculation of peak-scale non-Gaussianity for this model class, finding local f_NL around 0.1, plus the first systematic all-scale scan. The numerics look carefully done. They test their M^2 interpolation at 95% C.L., calibrate horizon crossing with three reheating scenarios, and use a real Press-Schechter integration for f_PBH rather than the crude P_zeta(k) < 0.01 shortcut. The LISA foreground treatment is concrete, and the contrast with polynomial alpha-attractors, where perturbativity fails, is useful context.

Where are the soft spots? The load-bearing step is the claim that tree-level P_zeta suffices for PBHs and induced GWs. The support is Eq. (3.6), an approximate estimator derived for scale-invariant spectra, plus a full shape check for one benchmark model. Locality is then assumed across the whole viable region. The paper itself says 'Pending a more systematic check of perturbativity,' so the authors know this. The polynomial case in Ref. [19] shows the concern is not academic. If the true one-loop correction at the peak were order unity instead of 10^-2, the f_PBH=1 boundary and the LISA SNR contours would shift, and the exact extent of the 'LISA-detectable' region would change. That is a real limitation, but I would not call it fatal: f_NL is small, the dynamics are different from the polynomial case, and the authors are transparent about the gap. A referee should ask for a more systematic one-loop estimate or a least a clear statement that the boundaries are provisional until such a check is done.

Minor note: no code or data release, which would help verify the numerics. That is becoming a standard expectation.

Who is this for? Anyone working on PBHs, scalar-induced GWs, multi-field inflation, or LISA science. It gives LISA a concrete target and a methodology that others can apply. I would send it to peer review with a request to tighten the perturbativity argument. The paper is honest, the methods are appropriate, and the caveat is stated rather than hidden.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops and applies a multi-scale testing pipeline to hybrid α-attractors with potential (1.2), scanning a reduced (χ0, d) parameter slice with fixed {α=1, m̃=0.3, g̃=0.8}. The authors calibrate horizon crossing for three reheating scenarios (ΔN_CMB = 50, 52.5, 54), fit M^2 to the CMB amplitude, and impose Planck+BICEP/Keck constraints on ns, αs, r and COBE/FIRAS μ-distortion limits. They then compute the bispectrum at peak scales, argue that non-Gaussianity is local with f_NL ~ O(0.1), and use the tree-level P_ζ to compute PBH abundances and LISA/ET SNR. The central result is that for short reheating a subset of models passes all large-scale and PBH-overproduction tests and has LISA SNR above the astrophysical foreground.

Significance. The paper is significant because it provides a concrete end-to-end template for testing inflationary scenarios on all scales, combining careful numerical calibration (M^2 interpolation tested at 95% C.L., horizon-crossing iteration, three reheating scenarios) with public codes PyTransport and SIGWfast. If the tree-level perturbativity assumption is correct, the identification of LISA-detectable hybrid α-attractor models that are simultaneously consistent with CMB, μ-distortion, and PBH bounds is a useful and non-trivial target for future observations. The main caveat is that the perturbativity evidence is approximate and explicitly deferred, so the headline conclusions are conditional on a more systematic check.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 3, Eq. (3.6)] The estimator P_ζ^{1-loop}/P_ζ ≈ f_NL^2 P_ζ is derived for scale-invariant spectra and a local ansatz, whereas the models here have a strongly peaked, multi-field-generated spectrum. Non-local one-loop contributions involving the tachyonically amplified χ modes are not obviously bounded by this single factor; the manuscript itself states 'Pending a more systematic check of perturbativity' and Ref. [19] provides a closely related counter-example. Because f_PBH is exponentially sensitive and Ω_GW is quadratically sensitive to the peak amplitude, the viable LISA region in Fig. 8 is not fully established until this point is addressed.
[Sec. 3, Figs. 5 and 6] The locality of the bispectrum is demonstrated for one benchmark model only; Fig. 6 scans f_NL in the equilateral configuration over the viable region, not the full shape. Since Eq. (3.5) assumes ζ is a function of a single Gaussian field and this underpins Eq. (3.6), the paper should either verify the local shape over a representative sample of the viable (χ0, d) region or explicitly downgrade the locality claim to an assumption. The numerical δN computation mentioned in footnote 13 is not shown and could provide supporting evidence.
[Sec. 4.1] The PBH abundance is computed with a Gaussian PDF for the linear compaction δ_{R,l}, while non-perturbative stochastic effects are deferred. This assumption is load-bearing because the filter f_PBH ≤ 1 selects the models that survive to the LISA SNR plots in Fig. 8, and PBH abundances are exponentially sensitive to the tail of the distribution. The paper should either quantify the sensitivity of the f_PBH contours to non-Gaussian tails or present the PBH constraints as provisional rather than as a definitive viability criterion.

minor comments (4)

[Sec. 1.2] The text 'do not overproduce PHBs' should read 'PBHs'.
[Sec. 2.1, near Eq. (2.3)] The phrase 'wherehigher-order coefficents' contains a spacing/typo and should be corrected.
[Sec. 4.2] 'the SIWG energy density' should read 'the SIGW energy density'.
[Abstract and Sec. 5] The 'first-of-its-kind study' phrasing is stronger than warranted given that Refs. [12,19] already combine large- and small-scale constraints; consider qualifying the novelty claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: PBH and LISA predictions are genuine outputs of the hybrid-α-attractor model, with only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation in the perturbativity comparison.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The model parameters (χ0, d) are scanned rather than tuned to the small-scale targets; M^2 is normalized to the CMB amplitude via PyTransport, and the outputs f_PBH, Ω_GW, and SNR follow from direct numerical evolution and the standard integrals in Eqs. (4.4), (4.6), and (4.7), not from fitting to PBH or LISA data. The large-scale constraints (Planck ns, αs, r; COBE/FIRAS μ) are external. The perturbativity check is approximate: Eq. (3.6) uses the local ansatz (3.5) and f_NL^2 P_ζ as an indicator, and the paper explicitly states 'Pending a more systematic check of perturbativity' (Sec. 3). This is a stated limitation on robustness, not a circular reduction: tree-level P_ζ is not defined in terms of the loop estimate, nor is f_NL fitted to make the ratio small. The only relevant self-citation, Ref. [19] (Iacconi & Mulryne), is used to contrast polynomial α-attractors and is not load-bearing for the hybrid model's predictions, which are computed here. No step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 11 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a small set of model parameters scanned or fixed by hand, standard cosmological assumptions about reheating and PBH formation, and an approximate perturbativity estimate that is flagged as pending. No new entities are invented; the model is from prior literature. The main burden on the reader is trusting that the fixed parameters (alpha, m_tilde, g_tilde) are representative and that Eq. (3.6) captures the loop corrections.

free parameters (11)

chi0 = scanned over [2.0, 2.6]
Potential parameter setting the position of the power spectrum peak; central to the reduced parameter space.
d = scanned over [-1e-5, -1e-6] (negative)
Potential parameter setting the amplitude of the power spectrum peak; fine-tuned to give sufficient amplification.
alpha = 1
Hyperbolic field-space curvature fixed by hand; not scanned.
m_tilde = 0.3
Inflaton bare mass (in units of M^2) fixed by hand.
g_tilde = 0.8
Inflaton-chi coupling fixed by hand.
M^2 = set by matching ln(10^10 As)=3.044 at k_CMB
Overall mass scale calibrated to the observed CMB amplitude. Standard normalization, but technically fitted to data.
Delta N_CMB = 50, 52.5, 54
E-folds from CMB pivot crossing to end of inflation; three representative values sampling different reheating durations.
w (reheating EoS) = 0
Matter-dominated reheating assumed; the paper states this is a simplification.
delta_c = 0.25
PBH collapse threshold, from literature.
K = 10
Critical collapse normalization, from literature.
gamma = 0.36
Critical collapse exponent, from literature.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption The two-field potential (1.2) with fixed parameters {alpha=1, m_tilde=0.3, g_tilde=0.8} faithfully represents hybrid alpha-attractor inflation.
Adopted from Ref. [21]; the paper restricts to this slice.
domain assumption PyTransport computes tree-level 2- and 3-point functions correctly for these models.
Public numerical code; the paper's central computations rely on it.
ad hoc to paper Reheating can be modeled as perturbative and matter-dominated, w=0, with rho_th >= (1 TeV)^4.
The paper states non-perturbative reheating is beyond scope; w=0 is an assumption.
domain assumption The analytic mu-distortion window function Eq. (2.14) gives accurate enough mu values.
Standard from Chluba et al.; the paper notes numerical windows can differ at peak edges.
ad hoc to paper The curvature perturbation at peak scales is a function of a single Gaussian field, so Eq. (3.5) and Eq. (3.6) apply.
Used to estimate 1-loop corrections; locality verified for one model only.
domain assumption PBH formation follows Press-Schechter with Gaussian compaction and threshold delta_c=0.25.
Standard methodology; the paper notes other methods and shape-dependent thresholds exist.
domain assumption SIGW spectrum computed with Eq. (4.6) with cg=0.4 and radiation-domination production.
Standard second-order perturbation theory result.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Testing inflation on all scales: a case study with $\alpha$-attractors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NRLSLARN

@misc{pith2026241202544,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Testing inflation on all scales: a case study with $\alpha$-attractors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NRLSLARN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02544}
}

abstract

A plethora of inflationary models can produce interesting small-scale phenomenology, such as enhanced scalar fluctuations leading to primordial black hole (PBH) production and large scalar-induced GW. Nevertheless, good models must simultaneously explain current observations on all scales. In this work, we showcase our methodology to establish the small-scale phenomenology of inflationary models on firm grounds. We consider the case of hybrid $\alpha$-attractors, and focus on a reduced parameter space featuring the two potential parameters which roughly determine the position of the peak in the scalar power spectrum, $\mathcal{P}_\zeta$, and its amplitude. We first constrain the parameter space by comparing the large-scale predictions for $\mathcal{P}_\zeta$ with current CMB anisotropies measurements and upper limits on $\mu$-distortions. We take into account uncertainties due to the reheating phase, and observe that the parameter-space area compatible with large-scale constraints shrinks for extended reheating stages. We then move to smaller scales, where we find that non-Gaussianity at peak scales is of the local type and has amplitude $f_\text{NL}\sim \mathcal{O}(0.1)$. This ensures that non-linear effects are subdominant, motivating us to employ the tree-level $\mathcal{P}_\zeta$ to compute the abundance of PBHs and the spectrum of induced GWs for models consistent with large-scale tests. The former allows us to further constrain the parameter space, by excluding models which over-produce PBHs. We find that a subset of viable models can lead to significant production of PBHs, and a fraction of these is within reach for LISA, having a signal-to-noise ratio larger than that of astrophysical foregrounds. Our first-of-its-kind study systematically combines tests at different scales, and exploits the synergy between cosmological observations and theoretical consistency requirements.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Post-inflationary enhancement of adiabatic perturbations in modular cosmology
astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In modular inflation models, entropic perturbations frozen during inflation are converted into curvature perturbations after inflation, producing an enhanced power spectrum while preserving the spectral index ns.
Reconstructing Primordial Curvature Perturbations via Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves with LISA
astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

LISA can reconstruct the primordial curvature power spectrum from scalar-induced gravitational waves, with percent-level precision near the peak and Bayesian tests separating SIGWs from other sources.
Amplifying the Cosmological Collider with Ghost Spectators
hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Ghost-condensate spectator fields exchanged during inflation cut the Boltzmann suppression of cosmological collider signals to e^{-πμ/2}, amplifying heavy-particle bispectrum and trispectrum imprints.
One-loop corrections to the E-type $\alpha$-attractor models of inflation and primordial black hole production
gr-qc 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

For E-type alpha-attractor inflation models tuned to produce asteroid-mass primordial black holes, the one-loop correction from cubic interactions is only a few percent of the tree-level power spectrum.
Can tensor-scalar induced GWs dominate PTA observations ?
astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A Bayesian fit to NANOGrav 15-year data finds that tensor-scalar induced gravitational waves plus primordial tensor waves can fit the PTA background, with amplitudes constrained by CMB, BAO, and PBH limits.
Tensor induced gravitational waves
astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Second-order tensor-induced gravitational waves can shift the inferred parameters of small-scale primordial gravitational wave models fitted to NANOGrav 15-year data, with one model favored by Bayes factors.
Cosmological constraints on small-scale primordial non-Gaussianity
astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Current pulsar-timing, CMB, BAO and PBH data constrain the small-scale local f_NL to -10.0 < f_NL < 1.2 for a monochromatic primordial power spectrum, with that constraint conditional on the spectral amplitude A_zeta = 10^-2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

144 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers

[19]

Iacconi and D

L. Iacconi and D. J. Mulryne,Multi-field inflation with large scalar fluctuations: non-Gaussianity and perturbativity, JCAP 09 (2023) 033 [2304.14260]

arXiv 2023
[1]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [1807.06211]

arXiv 2020
[2]

A. D. Gow, C. T. Byrnes, P. S. Cole and S. Young,The power spectrum on small scales: Robust constraints and comparing PBH methodologies, JCAP 02 (2021) 002 [2008.03289]

arXiv 2021
[3]

Vennin and D

V. Vennin and D. Wands,Quantum diffusion and large primordial perturbations from inflation, 2402.12672

arXiv
[4]

B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking,Black holes in the early Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168 (1974) 399

1974
[5]

A. M. Green,Primordial black holes as a dark matter candidate - a brief overview, Nucl. Phys. B 1003 (2024) 116494 [2402.15211]

arXiv 2024
[6]

K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson and D. Wands,The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 123518 [gr-qc/0612013]

arXiv 2007
[7]

Baumann, P

D. Baumann, P. J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi and K. Ichiki,Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 084019 [hep-th/0703290]

arXiv 2007

Show all 144 references

[8]

Baumann and L

D. Baumann and L. McAllister,Inflation and String Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2015, 10.1017/CBO9781316105733, [1404.2601]

2015 arXiv
[9]

G. A. Palma, S. Sypsas and C. Zenteno,Seeding primordial black holes in multifield inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 121301 [2004.06106]

2020 arXiv
[10]

Fumagalli, S

J. Fumagalli, S. Renaux-Petel, J. W. Ronayne and L. T. Witkowski,Turning in the landscape: A new mechanism for generating primordial black holes, Phys. Lett. B841 (2023) 137921 [2004.08369]

2023 arXiv
[11]

Braglia, D

M. Braglia, D. K. Hazra, F. Finelli, G. F. Smoot, L. Sriramkumar and A. A. Starobinsky, Generating PBHs and small-scale GWs in two-field models of inflation, JCAP 08 (2020) 001 [2005.02895]

2020 arXiv
[12]

Iacconi, H

L. Iacconi, H. Assadullahi, M. Fasiello and D. Wands,Revisiting small-scale fluctuations in α-attractor models of inflation, JCAP 06 (2022) 007 [2112.05092]

2022 arXiv
[13]

Achúcarro, R

A. Achúcarro, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, D.-G. Wang and Y. Welling,Universality of multi-field α-attractors, JCAP 04 (2018) 028 [1711.09478]

2018 arXiv
[14]

Kallosh and A

R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Escher in the Sky, Comptes Rendus Physique16 (2015) 914 [1503.06785]

2015 arXiv
[15]

Kallosh and A

R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Universality Class in Conformal Inflation, JCAP 07 (2013) 002 [1306.5220]

2013 arXiv
[16]

Kallosh, A

R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest,Superconformal Inflationaryα-Attractors, JHEP 11 (2013) 198 [1311.0472]

2013 arXiv
[17]

Kallosh and A

R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Polynomial α-attractors, JCAP 04 (2022) 017 [2202.06492]

2022 arXiv
[18]

Kallosh and A

R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Dilaton-axion inflation with PBHs and GWs, JCAP 08 (2022) 037 [2203.10437]

2022 arXiv
[20]

Kallosh and A

R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Hybrid cosmological attractors, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 023522 [2204.02425]. – 24 –

2022 arXiv
[21]

Braglia, A

M. Braglia, A. Linde, R. Kallosh and F. Finelli,Hybrid α-attractors, primordial black holes and gravitational wave backgrounds, JCAP 04 (2023) 033 [2211.14262]

2023 arXiv
[22]

Garcia-Bellido, A

J. Garcia-Bellido, A. D. Linde and D. Wands,Density perturbations and black hole formation in hybrid inflation, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 6040 [astro-ph/9605094]

1996 arXiv
[23]

A. D. Linde,Axions in inflationary cosmology, Phys. Lett. B259 (1991) 38

1991
[24]

A. D. Linde,Hybrid inflation, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 748 [astro-ph/9307002]

1994 arXiv
[25]

A. G. Riess et al.,A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys. J. Lett.934 (2022) L7 [2112.04510]

2022 arXiv
[26]

E. Abdalla et al.,Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies, JHEAp 34 (2022) 49 [2203.06142]

2022 arXiv
[27]

Jiang and Y.-S

J.-Q. Jiang and Y.-S. Piao,Toward early dark energy and ns=1 with Planck, ACT, and SPT observations, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 103514 [2202.13379]

2022 arXiv
[28]

Martin, C

J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin,Encyclopædia Inflationaris: Opiparous Edition, Phys. Dark Univ. 5-6 (2014) 75 [1303.3787]

2014 arXiv
[29]

Martin, C

J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin,Cosmic Inflation at the crossroads, JCAP 07 (2024) 087 [2404.10647]

2024 arXiv
[30]

D. J. Mulryne and J. W. Ronayne,PyTransport: A Python package for the calculation of inflationary correlation functions, J. Open Source Softw.3 (2018) 494 [1609.00381]

2018 arXiv
[31]

J. W. Ronayne and D. J. Mulryne,Numerically evaluating the bispectrum in curved field-space— with PyTransport 2.0, JCAP 01 (2018) 023 [1708.07130]

2018 arXiv
[32]

M. Dias, J. Frazer, D. J. Mulryne and D. Seery,Numerical evaluation of the bispectrum in multiple field inflation—the transport approach with code, JCAP 12 (2016) 033 [1609.00379]

2016 arXiv
[33]

Motohashi and W

H. Motohashi and W. Hu,Primordial Black Holes and Slow-Roll Violation, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 063503 [1706.06784]

2017 arXiv
[34]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A1 [1807.06205]

2020 arXiv
[35]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A5 [1907.12875]

2020 arXiv
[36]

BICEP, Keck collaboration, Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 151301 [2110.00483]

2021
[37]

Paoletti, F

D. Paoletti, F. Finelli, J. Valiviita and M. Hazumi,Planck and BICEP/Keck Array 2018 constraints on primordial gravitational waves and perspectives for future B-mode polarization measurements, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 083528 [2208.10482]

2022 arXiv
[38]

D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, J. C. Mather, R. A. Shafer and E. L. Wright,The Cosmic Microwave Background spectrum from the full COBE FIRAS data set, Astrophys. J. 473 (1996) 576 [astro-ph/9605054]

1996 arXiv
[39]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A9 [1905.05697]

2020 arXiv
[40]

Cheng, D.-S

S.-L. Cheng, D.-S. Lee and K.-W. Ng,Power spectrum of primordial perturbations during ultra-slow-roll inflation with back reaction effects, Phys. Lett. B827 (2022) 136956 [2106.09275]. – 25 –

2022 arXiv
[41]

Inomata, M

K. Inomata, M. Braglia, X. Chen and S. Renaux-Petel,Questions on calculation of primordial power spectrum with large spikes: the resonance model case, JCAP 04 (2023) 011 [2211.02586]

2023 arXiv
[42]

Kristiano and J

J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama,Constraining Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 221003 [2211.03395]

2024 arXiv
[43]

Riotto,The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Not Ruled Out, 2301.00599

A. Riotto,The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Not Ruled Out, 2301.00599

arXiv
[44]

Kristiano and J

J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama,Note on the bispectrum and one-loop corrections in single-field inflation with primordial black hole formation, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 103541 [2303.00341]

2024 arXiv
[45]

Riotto,The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Still Not Ruled Out, 2303.01727

A. Riotto,The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Still Not Ruled Out, 2303.01727

arXiv
[46]

Firouzjahi,One-loop corrections in power spectrum in single field inflation, JCAP 10 (2023) 006 [2303.12025]

H. Firouzjahi,One-loop corrections in power spectrum in single field inflation, JCAP 10 (2023) 006 [2303.12025]

2023 arXiv
[47]

Motohashi and Y

H. Motohashi and Y. Tada,Squeezed bispectrum and one-loop corrections in transient constant-roll inflation, JCAP 08 (2023) 069 [2303.16035]

2023 arXiv
[48]

Firouzjahi and A

H. Firouzjahi and A. Riotto,Primordial Black Holes and loops in single-field inflation, JCAP 02 (2024) 021 [2304.07801]

2024 arXiv
[49]

Franciolini, A

G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior., M. Taoso and A. Urbano,Perturbativity in the presence of ultraslow-roll dynamics, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 123550 [2305.03491]

2024 arXiv
[50]

Tasinato,Large |η| approach to single field inflation, Phys

G. Tasinato,Large |η| approach to single field inflation, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 043526 [2305.11568]

2023 arXiv
[51]

Cheng, D.-S

S.-L. Cheng, D.-S. Lee and K.-W. Ng,Primordial perturbations from ultra-slow-roll single-field inflation with quantum loop effects, JCAP 03 (2024) 008 [2305.16810]

2024
[52]

Fumagalli,Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics, JHEP 05 (2025) 162 [2305.19263]

J. Fumagalli,Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics, JHEP 05 (2025) 162 [2305.19263]

2025 arXiv
[53]

Y. Tada, T. Terada and J. Tokuda,Cancellation of quantum corrections on the soft curvature perturbations, JHEP 01 (2024) 105 [2308.04732]

2024 arXiv
[54]

Firouzjahi,Revisiting loop corrections in single field ultraslow-roll inflation, Phys

H. Firouzjahi,Revisiting loop corrections in single field ultraslow-roll inflation, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 043514 [2311.04080]

2024 arXiv
[55]

M. W. Davies, L. Iacconi and D. J. Mulryne,Numerical 1-loop correction from a potential yielding ultra-slow-roll dynamics, JCAP 04 (2024) 050 [2312.05694]

2024 arXiv
[56]

Iacconi, D

L. Iacconi, D. Mulryne and D. Seery,Loop corrections in the separate universe picture, JCAP 06 (2024) 062 [2312.12424]

2024 arXiv
[57]

Braglia and L

M. Braglia and L. Pinol,No time to derive: unraveling total time derivatives in in-in perturbation theory, JHEP 08 (2024) 068 [2403.14558]

2024 arXiv
[58]

Inomata,Superhorizon Curvature Perturbations Are Protected against One-Loop Corrections, Phys

K. Inomata,Superhorizon Curvature Perturbations Are Protected against One-Loop Corrections, Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 141001 [2403.04682]

2024 arXiv
[59]

Ballesteros and J

G. Ballesteros and J. G. Egea,One-loop power spectrum in ultra slow-roll inflation and implications for primordial black hole dark matter, JCAP 07 (2024) 052 [2404.07196]

2024 arXiv
[60]

Kawaguchi, S

R. Kawaguchi, S. Tsujikawa and Y. Yamada,Proving the absence of large one-loop corrections to the power spectrum of curvature perturbations in transient ultra-slow-roll inflation within the path-integral approach, JHEP 12 (2024) 095 [2407.19742]

2024 arXiv
[61]

Fumagalli,Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics

J. Fumagalli,Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics. Part 2. Quartic interactions and consistency relations, JHEP 01 (2025) 108 [2408.08296]. – 26 –

2025 arXiv
[62]

Green and K

D. Green and K. Gupta,Soft Metric Fluctuations During Inflation, 2410.11973

arXiv
[63]

Fumagalli, S

J. Fumagalli, S. Bhattacharya, M. Peloso, S. Renaux-Petel and L. T. Witkowski,One-loop infrared rescattering by enhanced scalar fluctuations during inflation, JCAP 04 (2024) 029 [2307.08358]

2024 arXiv
[64]

Caravano, K

A. Caravano, K. Inomata and S. Renaux-Petel,Inflationary Butterfly Effect: Nonperturbative Dynamics from Small-Scale Features, Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 151001 [2403.12811]

2024 arXiv
[65]

Caravano, G

A. Caravano, G. Franciolini and S. Renaux-Petel,Ultraslow-roll inflation on the lattice: Backreaction and nonlinear effects, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 063518 [2410.23942]

2025 arXiv
[66]

LISA collaboration, Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786

arXiv
[67]

Rel.26 (2023) 5 [2204.05434]

LISA Cosmology Working Group collaboration, Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel.26 (2023) 5 [2204.05434]

2023 arXiv
[68]

Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class

M. Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav.27 (2010) 194002

2010
[69]

Maggiore et al.,Science Case for the Einstein Telescope, JCAP 03 (2020) 050 [1912.02622]

M. Maggiore et al.,Science Case for the Einstein Telescope, JCAP 03 (2020) 050 [1912.02622]

2020 arXiv
[70]

Caprini, O

C. Caprini, O. Pujolàs, H. Quelquejay-Leclere, F. Rompineve and D. A. Steer,Primordial gravitational wave backgrounds from phase transitions with next generation ground based detectors, Class. Quant. Grav.42 (2025) 045015 [2406.02359]

2025 arXiv
[71]

Afzal, A

A. Afzal, A. Ghoshal and S. F. King,Primordial black holes and scalar-induced gravitational waves in sneutrino hybrid inflation, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 023050 [2407.15082]

2025 arXiv
[72]

Afzal and A

A. Afzal and A. Ghoshal,Primordial black holes and scalar-induced gravitational waves in radiative hybrid inflation, Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 983 [2402.06613]

2024 arXiv
[73]

J. J. M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest,Hyperbolic geometry of cosmological attractors, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 041301 [1504.05557]

2015 arXiv
[74]

K. D. Lozanov,Lectures on Reheating after Inflation, 1907.04402

1907 arXiv
[75]

Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology

V. Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 2005, 10.1017/CBO9780511790553

2005 doi
[76]

Dalianis, A

I. Dalianis, A. Kehagias and G. Tringas,Primordial black holes fromα-attractors, JCAP 01 (2019) 037 [1805.09483]

2019 arXiv
[77]

Y. B. Zeldovich and R. A. Sunyaev,The Interaction of Matter and Radiation in a Hot-Model Universe, Astrophys. Space Sci.4 (1969) 301

1969
[78]

W. Hu, D. Scott and J. Silk,Power spectrum constraints from spectral distortions in the cosmic microwave background, Astrophys. J. Lett.430 (1994) L5 [astro-ph/9402045]

1994 arXiv
[79]

Chluba and R

J. Chluba and R. A. Sunyaev,The evolution of CMB spectral distortions in the early Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.419 (2012) 1294 [1109.6552]

2012 arXiv
[80]

Chluba, R

J. Chluba, R. Khatri and R. A. Sunyaev,CMB at 2x2 order: The dissipation of primordial acoustic waves and the observable part of the associated energy release, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.425 (2012) 1129 [1202.0057]

2012 arXiv
[81]

Chluba, J

J. Chluba, J. Hamann and S. P. Patil,Features and New Physical Scales in Primordial Observables: Theory and Observation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24 (2015) 1530023 [1505.01834]

2015 arXiv
[82]

Schöneberg, M

N. Schöneberg, M. Lucca and D. C. Hooper,Constraining the inflationary potential with spectral distortions, JCAP 03 (2021) 036 [2010.07814]

2021 arXiv
[83]

C. Ünal, E. D. Kovetz and S. P. Patil,Multimessenger probes of inflationary fluctuations and primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 063519 [2008.11184]. – 27 –

2021 arXiv
[84]

Pajer and M

E. Pajer and M. Zaldarriaga,A New Window on Primordial non-Gaussianity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 021302 [1201.5375]

2012 arXiv
[85]

B. Cyr, T. Kite, J. Chluba, J. C. Hill, D. Jeong, S. K. Acharya et al.,Disentangling the primordial nature of stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds with CMB spectral distortions, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.528 (2024) 883 [2309.02366]

2024 arXiv
[86]

Tagliazucchi, M

M. Tagliazucchi, M. Braglia, F. Finelli and M. Pieroni,Quest for CMB spectral distortions to probe the scalar-induced gravitational wave background interpretation of pulsar timing array data, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) L021305 [2310.08527]

2025 arXiv
[87]

J. M. Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, JHEP 05 (2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603]

2003 arXiv
[88]

Bartolo, E

N. Bartolo, E. Komatsu, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Non-Gaussianity from inflation: Theory and observations, Phys. Rept. 402 (2004) 103 [astro-ph/0406398]

2004 arXiv
[89]

Liguori, E

M. Liguori, E. Sefusatti, J. R. Fergusson and E. P. S. Shellard,Primordial non-Gaussianity and Bispectrum Measurements in the Cosmic Microwave Background and Large-Scale Structure, Adv. Astron.2010 (2010) 980523 [1001.4707]

2010 arXiv
[90]

Chen,Primordial Non-Gaussianities from Inflation Models, Adv

X. Chen,Primordial Non-Gaussianities from Inflation Models, Adv. Astron.2010 (2010) 638979 [1002.1416]

2010 arXiv
[91]

Komatsu,Hunting for Primordial Non-Gaussianity in the Cosmic Microwave Background, Class

E. Komatsu,Hunting for Primordial Non-Gaussianity in the Cosmic Microwave Background, Class. Quant. Grav.27 (2010) 124010 [1003.6097]

2010 arXiv
[92]

Renaux-Petel,Primordial non-Gaussianities after Planck 2015: an introductory review, Comptes Rendus Physique16 (2015) 969 [1508.06740]

S. Renaux-Petel,Primordial non-Gaussianities after Planck 2015: an introductory review, Comptes Rendus Physique16 (2015) 969 [1508.06740]

2015 arXiv
[93]

Mooij and G

S. Mooij and G. A. Palma,Consistently violating the non-Gaussian consistency relation, JCAP 11 (2015) 025 [1502.03458]

2015 arXiv
[94]

Bravo, S

R. Bravo, S. Mooij, G. A. Palma and B. Pradenas,A generalized non-Gaussian consistency relation for single field inflation, JCAP 05 (2018) 024 [1711.02680]

2018 arXiv
[95]

A. A. Abolhasani, H. Firouzjahi and M. H. Namjoo,Curvature Perturbations and non-Gaussianities from Waterfall Phase Transition during Inflation, Class. Quant. Grav.28 (2011) 075009 [1010.6292]

2011 arXiv
[96]

Mulryne, S

D. Mulryne, S. Orani and A. Rajantie,Non-Gaussianity from the hybrid potential, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 123527 [1107.4739]

2011 arXiv
[97]

Wands,Local non-Gaussianity from inflation, Class

D. Wands,Local non-Gaussianity from inflation, Class. Quant. Grav.27 (2010) 124002 [1004.0818]

2010 arXiv
[98]

D. H. Lyth,Non-gaussianity and cosmic uncertainty in curvaton-type models, JCAP 06 (2006) 015 [astro-ph/0602285]

2006 arXiv
[99]

Kumar, L

J. Kumar, L. Leblond and A. Rajaraman,Scale Dependent Local Non-Gaussianity from Loops, JCAP 04 (2010) 024 [0909.2040]

2010 arXiv
[100]

W. H. Press and P. Schechter,Formation of galaxies and clusters of galaxies by selfsimilar gravitational condensation, Astrophys. J. 187 (1974) 425

1974
[101]

Young,Computing the abundance of primordial black holes, 2405.13259

S. Young,Computing the abundance of primordial black holes, 2405.13259

arXiv
[102]

Musco,Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological perturbations, Phys

I. Musco,Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 123524 [1809.02127]

2019 arXiv
[103]

Germani and I

C. Germani and I. Musco,Abundance of Primordial Black Holes Depends on the Shape of the Inflationary Power Spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 141302 [1805.04087]

2019 arXiv
[104]

Young,The primordial black hole formation criterion re-examined: Parametrisation, timing and the choice of window function, Int

S. Young,The primordial black hole formation criterion re-examined: Parametrisation, timing and the choice of window function, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D29 (2019) 2030002 [1905.01230]. – 28 –

2019 arXiv
[105]

Musco, V

I. Musco, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini and A. Riotto,Threshold for primordial black holes. II. A simple analytic prescription, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 063538 [2011.03014]

2021 arXiv
[106]

Young, I

S. Young, I. Musco and C. T. Byrnes,Primordial black hole formation and abundance: contribution from the non-linear relation between the density and curvature perturbation, JCAP 11 (2019) 012 [1904.00984]

2019 arXiv
[107]

M. Kopp, S. Hofmann and J. Weller,Separate Universes Do Not Constrain Primordial Black Hole Formation, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 124025 [1012.4369]

2011 arXiv
[108]

J. C. Niemeyer and K. Jedamzik,Near-critical gravitational collapse and the initial mass function of primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.80 (1998) 5481 [astro-ph/9709072]

1998 arXiv
[109]

Young and M

S. Young and M. Musso,Application of peaks theory to the abundance of primordial black holes, JCAP 11 (2020) 022 [2001.06469]

2020 arXiv
[110]

Sasaki, T

M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka and S. Yokoyama,Primordial black holes—perspectives in gravitational wave astronomy, Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 063001 [1801.05235]

2018 arXiv
[111]

B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda and J. Yokoyama,Constraints on primordial black holes, Rept. Prog. Phys.84 (2021) 116902 [2002.12778]

2021 arXiv
[112]

Bird et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Primordial black hole dark matter, Phys

S. Bird et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Primordial black hole dark matter, Phys. Dark Univ.41 (2023) 101231 [2203.08967]

2023 arXiv
[113]

Domènech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review, Universe 7 (2021) 398 [2109.01398]

G. Domènech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review, Universe 7 (2021) 398 [2109.01398]

2021 arXiv
[114]

Caprini,Stochastic background of gravitational waves from cosmological sources, J

C. Caprini,Stochastic background of gravitational waves from cosmological sources, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 610 (2015) 012004 [1501.01174]

2015 arXiv
[115]

Hu and Y.-L

W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu,The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity, Natl. Sci. Rev.4 (2017) 685

2017
[116]

TianQin collaboration, TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 035010 [1512.02076]

2016 arXiv
[117]

Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

D. Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51 (2019) 035 [1907.04833]

2019 arXiv
[118]

NANOGra vcollaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett.951 (2023) L8 [2306.16213]

2023 arXiv
[119]

NANOGra vcollaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Observations and Timing of 68 Millisecond Pulsars, Astrophys. J. Lett.951 (2023) L9 [2306.16217]

2023 arXiv
[120]

Search for gravitational wave signals, Astron

EPTA, InPTA: collaboration, The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals, Astron. Astrophys.678 (2023) A50 [2306.16214]

2023 arXiv
[121]

The dataset and timing analysis, Astron

EPTAcollaboration, The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - I. The dataset and timing analysis, Astron. Astrophys.678 (2023) A48 [2306.16224]

2023 arXiv
[122]

Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe, Astron

EPTA, InPTA collaboration, The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe, Astron. Astrophys. 685 (2024) A94 [2306.16227]

2024 arXiv
[123]

D. J. Reardon et al.,Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Astrophys. J. Lett.951 (2023) L6 [2306.16215]

2023 arXiv
[124]

D. J. Reardon et al.,The Gravitational-wave Background Null Hypothesis: Characterizing Noise in Millisecond Pulsar Arrival Times with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L7 [2306.16229]. – 29 –

2023 arXiv
[125]

Zic et al.,The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array third data release, Publ

A. Zic et al.,The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array third data release, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 40 (2023) e049 [2306.16230]

2023 arXiv
[126]

Xu et al.,Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Res

H. Xu et al.,Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Res. Astron. Astrophys.23 (2023) 075024 [2306.16216]

2023 arXiv
[127]

Adshead, K

P. Adshead, K. D. Lozanov and Z. J. Weiner,Non-Gaussianity and the induced gravitational wave background, JCAP 10 (2021) 080 [2105.01659]

2021 arXiv
[128]

Chang, Y.-T

Z. Chang, Y.-T. Kuang, D. Wu, J.-Z. Zhou and Q.-H. Zhu,New constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity from missing two-loop contributions of scalar induced gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) L041303 [2311.05102]

2024 arXiv
[129]

Perna, C

G. Perna, C. Testini, A. Ricciardone and S. Matarrese,Fully non-Gaussian Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves, JCAP 05 (2024) 086 [2403.06962]

2024 arXiv
[130]

L. T. Witkowski,SIGWfast: a python package for the computation of scalar-induced gravitational wave spectra, 2209.05296

arXiv
[131]

T. L. Smith, T. L. Smith, R. R. Caldwell and R. Caldwell,LISA for Cosmologists: Calculating the Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Stochastic and Deterministic Sources, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 104055 [1908.00546]

2019 arXiv
[132]

Branchesi et al.,Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs, JCAP 07 (2023) 068 [2303.15923]

M. Branchesi et al.,Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs, JCAP 07 (2023) 068 [2303.15923]

2023 arXiv
[133]

pygwinc: Gravitational Wave Interferometer Noise Calculator

J. G. Rollins, E. Hall, C. Wipf and L. McCuller, “pygwinc: Gravitational Wave Interferometer Noise Calculator.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2007.020, July, 2020

2007
[134]

Babak, A

S. Babak, A. Petiteau and M. Hewitson,LISA Sensitivity and SNR Calculations, 2108.01167

arXiv
[135]

Karnesis, S

N. Karnesis, S. Babak, M. Pieroni, N. Cornish and T. Littenberg,Characterization of the stochastic signal originating from compact binary populations as measured by LISA, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 043019 [2103.14598]

2021 arXiv
[136]

Pieroni and E

M. Pieroni and E. Barausse,Foreground cleaning and template-free stochastic background extraction for LISA, JCAP 07 (2020) 021 [2004.01135]

2020 arXiv
[137]

Babak, C

S. Babak, C. Caprini, D. G. Figueroa, N. Karnesis, P. Marcoccia, G. Nardini et al.,Stochastic gravitational wave background from stellar origin binary black holes in LISA, JCAP 08 (2023) 034 [2304.06368]

2023 arXiv
[138]

Staelens and G

S. Staelens and G. Nelemans,Likelihood of white dwarf binaries to dominate the astrophysical gravitational wave background in the mHz band, Astron. Astrophys.683 (2024) A139 [2310.19448]

2024 arXiv
[139]

D. S. Bellie, S. Banagiri, Z. Doctor and V. Kalogera,Unresolved stochastic background from compact binary mergers detectable by next-generation ground-based gravitational-wave observatories, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 023006 [2310.02517]

2024 arXiv
[140]

Martin, C

J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin,Observing Inflationary Reheating, Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 081303 [1410.7958]

2015 arXiv
[141]

Iacconi, M

L. Iacconi, M. Fasiello, J. Väliviita and D. Wands,Novel CMB constraints on theα parameter in alpha-attractor models, JCAP 10 (2023) 015 [2306.00918]

2023 arXiv
[142]

Ballardini,Chasing cosmic inflation: constraints for inflationary models and reheating insights, JCAP 01 (2025) 116 [2408.03321]

M. Ballardini,Chasing cosmic inflation: constraints for inflationary models and reheating insights, JCAP 01 (2025) 116 [2408.03321]

2025 arXiv
[143]

Martin, C

J. Martin, C. Ringeval, R. Trotta and V. Vennin,The Best Inflationary Models After Planck, JCAP 03 (2014) 039 [1312.3529]

2014 arXiv
[144]

LISA Cosmology Working Group collaboration, Gravitational waves from inflation in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation, JCAP 11 (2024) 032 [2407.04356]. – 30 –

2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [19]

Iacconi and D

L. Iacconi and D. J. Mulryne,Multi-field inflation with large scalar fluctuations: non-Gaussianity and perturbativity, JCAP 09 (2023) 033 [2304.14260]

arXiv 2023

[2] [1]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [1807.06211]

arXiv 2020

[3] [2]

A. D. Gow, C. T. Byrnes, P. S. Cole and S. Young,The power spectrum on small scales: Robust constraints and comparing PBH methodologies, JCAP 02 (2021) 002 [2008.03289]

arXiv 2021

[4] [3]

Vennin and D

V. Vennin and D. Wands,Quantum diffusion and large primordial perturbations from inflation, 2402.12672

arXiv

[5] [4]

B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking,Black holes in the early Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168 (1974) 399

1974

[6] [5]

A. M. Green,Primordial black holes as a dark matter candidate - a brief overview, Nucl. Phys. B 1003 (2024) 116494 [2402.15211]

arXiv 2024

[7] [6]

K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson and D. Wands,The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 123518 [gr-qc/0612013]

arXiv 2007

[8] [7]

Baumann, P

D. Baumann, P. J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi and K. Ichiki,Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 084019 [hep-th/0703290]

arXiv 2007