Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Algebras and states in super-JT gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In $\mathcal{N}=2$ super-JT gravity coupled to arbitrary supersymmetric matter, each $\mathrm{gSU}(1,1|1)$ matter representation with small enough R-charge gives exactly one normalisable state with zero energy at both boundaries, and the…

desk verdict The ground-state counting and the simple product formula are new and solid, but the advertised Type II_1 factor rests on an explicitly unproved factor assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15549 v1 pith:5ICQERGP submitted 2024-12-20 hep-th gr-qcquant-ph

Geoff Penington , Edward Witten This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcquant-ph MSC 81T4046L1083C4581T60
keywords super-JTgravityTypeII_1vonNeumannalgebrazero-energygroundstatessupersymmetricmatterBPSmicrostatecountingboundaryalgebrasAdS2/CFT1
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish a precise count and an algebraic structure for the zero-energy states of super-JT gravity with matter. It shows that within every representation of the matter superisometry group there is exactly one normalisable state where both boundaries have zero energy, provided the boundary R-charges satisfy a simple matching condition. Projecting the right-boundary algebra onto these states produces a Type II$_1$ von Neumann factor containing one operator for each supersymmetric matter primary of small R-charge. For neutral primaries the matter vacuum is the unique tracial state, and for charged primaries the trace is a superposition over R-charge sectors weighted by $\cos(\pi J_R)$, which reproduces the ratio of BPS microstate counts. A sympathetic reader would care because this is a concrete bridge between algebraic derivations of black-hole entropy and string-theoretic microstate counting, and because it exhibits a natural Type II$_1$ algebra acting on an ordinary QFT Hilbert space.

What carries the argument

The central object is the projected ground-state algebra $\tilde{\mathcal{A}}_R=\tilde\Pi_R\mathcal{A}_R\tilde\Pi_R$, obtained by projecting the right-boundary observable algebra onto right-boundary zero-energy states. The key structural step is an isometry $\tilde V_{J_R}:\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{matt}}\to\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{super-JT}}$ identifying the $E_R=0$, fixed-$J_R$ subspace with the matter Hilbert space, and a similarly projected left supercharge $\tilde Q_L$ whose cohomology counts simultaneous ground states. The algebra is then spanned by projected matter primary operators $\tilde\Phi^i_R$, whose product closes with the explicit coefficients $A_{ij}^k$; their associativity is a nontrivial crossing constraint on matter three-point coefficients $C_{ijk}$. The trace on the neutral subalgebra is the matter vacuum expectation value, while the full trace is built from a superposition of vacua in different R-charge sectors with weights $\sqrt{\cos(\pi J_R)}$.

What would settle it

Take a concrete supersymmetric matter QFT on AdS$_2$, such as a free $\mathcal{N}=2$ hypermultiplet, construct the projected operators $\tilde\Phi^i_R$ from equation (5.19), and compute the commutant of the algebra they generate on the zero-energy subspace. Finding any bounded operator that commutes with every $\tilde\Phi^i_R$ yet is not a multiple of the identity would disprove the factor assumption. A more direct numerical check of the central formula would be to test the crossing relation $\tilde\Phi^i_R\tilde\Phi^j_R\tilde\Phi^k_R=(\tilde\Phi^i_R\tilde\Phi^j_R)\tilde\Phi^k_R$ against the ordinary four-point crossing of the matter OPE in a soluble model, since the closed product with coefficients $A_{ij}^k$ is claimed to be associative by construction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in canonically quantised $\mathcal{N}=2$ super-JT gravity coupled to an arbitrary supersymmetric matter QFT, the subspace of states annihilated by both boundary Hamiltonians contains exactly one normalisable state for each $\mathrm{gSU}(1,1|1)$ matter representation with primary R-charge $u$, for each pair of boundary R-charges $J_L, J_R$ obeying $J_L+J_R=2u$ and $|J_L|,|J_R|<1/2$. These simultaneous ground states are remarkable because, for non-BPS representations, they preserve supersymmetry at both boundaries while breaking it in the bulk. Projecting the right-boundary algebra onto the $E_R=J_R=0$ subspace identifies it with an algebra acting on the matter Hilbert space; the projected operators $\tilde\Phi^i_R$ close linearly, $\tilde\Phi^i_R\tilde\Phi^j_R=\sum_k A_{ij}^k\tilde\Phi^k_R$, with the explicit c-number coefficients $A_{ij}^k=C_{ij\bar k}4^{\Delta_k-\Delta_i-\Delta_j}\Gamma(1+2\Delta_i)\Gamma(1+2\Delta_j)/\Gamma(1+\Delta_i+\Delta_j+\Delta_k)$. The paper then proves that, assuming the projected algebra is a factor, it is Type II$_1$, that the matter vacuum is the trace in the neutral sector, and that including charged operators produces the microstate-counting weight $\cos(\pi J_R)$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the projected algebras $\tilde{\mathcal{A}}_{R,0}$ and $\tilde{\mathcal{A}}_R$ are factors, meaning their centres contain only multiples of the identity; the paper assumes this explicitly in Sections 5.3 and 5.4. If a matter theory admitted a nonscalar operator commuting with all projected boundary observables, the trace would not be unique or necessarily faithful, and the Type II$_1$ classification together with the $\cos(\pi J_R)$ microstate-counting interpretation would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central construction is correct, every supersymmetric matter theory with the appropriate R-charge spectrum yields a Type II$_1$ von Neumann factor acting on its own Hilbert space, with the vacuum as a tracial state; this is a qualitatively new example of a QFT-level von Neumann algebra with finite normalized trace.
  • The closed product formula for projected primaries implies an infinite set of crossing relations on the matter OPE coefficients $C_{ijk}$; these are new consistency conditions that any $\mathcal{N}=2$ QFT on AdS$_2$ must satisfy.
  • The trace of the projector onto R-charge sector $J_R$ is proportional to $\cos(\pi J_R)$, matching the Euclidean partition-function count of BPS microstates, so the boundary algebra directly encodes black-hole microstate ratios.
  • The paper's purely Lorentzian derivation of the bosonic JT gravity boundary algebras removes the previous reliance on Euclidean gravitational path integrals, placing the Type II$_\infty$ factor structure on a direct canonical footing.
  • The existence of exactly one simultaneous ground state per matter representation with small R-charge means that highly complex bulk matter configurations can be compatible with completely trivial boundary dynamics, a feature that may generalize to other low-dimensional gravitational models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One implication left implicit is that the crossing relations following from associativity of the projected algebra could be used as a bootstrap-style test: an $\mathcal{N}=2$ AdS$_2$ matter theory whose OPE coefficients violate the relation would be excluded as a consistent matter sector for super-JT gravity; this is a concrete and testable consequence the paper does not pursue.
  • The $\cos(\pi J_R)$ weights strongly resemble characters of the unitary supergroup $\mathrm{SU}(1|1)$, suggesting that the trace on the charged algebra may admit a purely representation-theoretic interpretation as a supercharacter; identifying it as such could connect the construction to modular or fusion data in other contexts.
  • The factor-ness assumption, which the paper cannot prove in full generality, is the point most likely to fail in exotic matter theories: a conserved bulk symmetry of zero R-charge that survives projection would appear as a nontrivial central operator, and a tractable next step would be to search for such operators in free or minimal $\mathcal{N}=2$ matter models.
  • The method of counting simultaneous ground states by the cohomology of $\tilde Q_L$ is phrased for $\mathrm{gSU}(1,1|1)$ but should extend to other supersymmetric near-horizon geometries, where the analogue of the $\cos(\pi J_R)$ weight would predict microstate ratios purely from the structure of the projected boundary algebra.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies N=2 super-JT gravity coupled to arbitrary supersymmetric matter. After reviewing the canonical quantization of bosonic JT gravity, it constructs the physical Hilbert space of super-JT gravity, isolates the subspace of right-boundary ground states, and proves that within each gSU(1,1|1) matter representation there is exactly one simultaneous left/right zero-energy state when the boundary R-charges satisfy JL + JR = 2u and |JL|,|JR| < 1/2. It then studies the projection of the right-boundary algebra onto ground states, eAR, and its neutral subalgebra eAR,0. The paper claims that, under an explicit factor assumption stated in Sections 5.3 and 5.4, eAR,0 is a Type II1 von Neumann factor acting on the matter QFT Hilbert space, with the QFT vacuum tracial; that the operators eΦi_R generated by matter primaries span the algebra and obey the closed product formula (5.20) with coefficients (5.21); and that including charged operators yields a trace weighted by cos(pi J_R), so that the algebra encodes ratios of BPS microstate counts. The paper also provides a purely Lorentzian derivation of the algebraic structure of bosonic JT gravity with matter, avoiding Euclidean gravitational path integrals.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper gives the first concrete construction of a Type II1 von Neumann algebra acting on a QFT Hilbert space, with an explicit and surprisingly simple product formula that implies new crossing constraints on AdS2 matter data. The Lorentzian derivation of the bosonic JT boundary algebra in Sections 2--3 is a genuine technical contribution, independent of the supersymmetric part. The ground-state counting in Section 4 confirms and makes precise the path-integral expectations of [28,29], and the trace computations in Appendix D are explicit and checkable. The paper is also commendably transparent about its main limitation: the factor property of eAR,0 and eAR is assumed, not proved. That limitation is load-bearing, and the abstract states the Type II1 result unconditionally, so the present version overclaims relative to what is established.

major comments (3)
  1. The classification of the ground-state algebra as a Type II1 factor is conditional on an explicitly unproved factor assumption. In Section 5.3 the authors write 'we shall therefore simply assume ... that we are working with a matter QFT where eAR,0 is a factor', and Section 5.4 makes the same assumption for eAR. This assumption is not cosmetic: the proof that the operators eΦi_R span (rather than merely generate) eAR,0 uses the faithfulness of the representation after projection by eΠL,0, and faithfulness is justified only because every representation of a factor is faithful. Consequently the product formula (5.20) with coefficients (5.21), the uniqueness and faithfulness of the trace (1.18), and the identification of Hmatt as the d = infinity representation all depend on factor-ness. If a nontrivial central operator exists, the trace is not unique and the state |MAX> in (5.47) can fail to be faithful. The abstract, however, states unconditionally that projecting onto zero-energy states 'leads to a Type II1 von Neumann factor'. The authors should either prove the factor assumption for a specified class of matter theories or reformulate the abstract and the theorem-like claims as conditional statements.
  2. The BPS-counting interpretation is a consistency check rather than an independent derivation. The tracial state |MAX> in (5.47) is constructed with weights sqrt(cos(pi J_R)), which are imported from the known Euclidean partition function results of [28,29]; equation (5.62) then recovers those weights as Tr[Pi_{J_R}]. Thus the statement that 'the algebra eAR knows that ... the number of BPS microstates ... scales as cos(pi J_R)' is true only in the weak sense that this input has been encoded in the definition of the trace. The authors are explicit that (5.62) 'is exactly the result one finds from Euclidean path integral computations', but the abstract's phrasing 'the ground state algebras encode the ratios of the number of BPS microstates' should be clarified so that readers do not infer an independent derivation from the algebra. This does not invalidate the consistency of the construction, but it is a substantive interpretive point that should be fixed.
  3. The identification of the commutant eA'_R,0 as a Type II_infinity factor isomorphic to AL, and hence the claim that Hmatt is the d = infinity representation of eAR,0, rests on unproved assertions in Section 5.2. There the authors state that they expect claims (a) and (b) to follow from 'obvious generalisations' of the bosonic arguments, but explicitly say 'we did not attempt to work through all the details'. In Section 5.3 these unproved claims are then used to conclude that eA'_R,0 is a Type II_infinity factor isomorphic to AL. This is a load-bearing step for the stated representation-theoretic classification of eAR,0. The authors should either provide the missing arguments or explicitly mark the d = infinity identification, and the surrounding statements, as conjectural.
minor comments (4)
  1. The claim that eAR,0 is 'the first natural example' of a Type II1 von Neumann algebra acting on a QFT Hilbert space is difficult to verify as stated; please either give a precise definition of 'natural' or soften the claim and add a comparison with related constructions in the literature.
  2. The notation C_{ij\bar k} in (5.21) is defined through the three-point function in (5.22) with a dagger on Φ^k_{L,0}; the conjugation convention relating \bar k to k should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion.
  3. The phrase 'we will now show that (5.20) is indeed true' appears before the factor assumption has been invoked in the argument; the logical order would be clearer if the role of the factor assumption were stated at the outset of the spanning proof, since the unconditional wording conflicts with the conditional status of the result.
  4. There is a typo in 'Hermitician'; it should read 'Hermitian'. Also, the sentence before Eq. (3.57) would benefit from a brief explanation of why the stated C_{ijk} symmetry holds in the general case.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The ground-state algebra derivation is mostly self-contained, but the cos(pi J_R) BPS ratio is inserted through the tracial ansatz, and the Type II1 claim rests on an explicitly assumed factor property.

  1. self definitional [Section 5.4, Eqs. (5.47) and (5.62)]
    "However, we can easily construct a state |MAX⟩ = Σ_{|JR|<1/2} √cos(πJR)|Ω^(JR)_matt⟩ (5.47) ... The number of zero-energy microstates with R-charge JR should be proportional to Tr[ΠJR] = ⟨\MAX|ΠJR|\MAX⟩ = cos(πJR)/Σ_{J'R} cos(πJ'R) (5.62). Indeed this is exactly the result one finds from Euclidean path integral computations [28,29]."

    The tracial state is built by hand with coefficients √cos(πJR) taken from the known Euclidean result, so Tr[ΠJR] in (5.62) is the square of the coefficient inserted in (5.47), not an independent output of the algebra. The subsequent statement that 'the algebra eAR knows' the BPS ratio cos(πJR) is therefore a consistency check: the cos microstate counting is an input to the state used to compute the trace, and the uniqueness of that trace is separately contingent on the assumed factor-ness of eAR in §5.4. The traciality check (5.49) verifies that the chosen weights are consistent with the charged two-point functions, but it does not derive the weights from the algebra without invoking the assumed factor structure.

full rationale

The paper's core technical derivations—the unique simultaneous ground-state count in §4.4 and the explicit product formula (5.20)–(5.21) in §5.3—are self-contained and do not reduce to their inputs. The Type II1 classification, however, is conditional on an explicit unproved premise: 'Except where otherwise stated, we shall therefore simply assume for the remainder of this section that we are working with a matter QFT where eAR,0 is a factor.' The same assumption is made for eAR in §5.4. This is not circularity, but it is load-bearing: without factor-ness the trace need not be unique or faithful, so the abstract's unconditional claim that projection 'leads to a Type II1 von Neumann factor' overstates what is established. The one genuinely circular step is the BPS microstate ratioclaime: the cos(πJR) weights are put into the tracial state |MAX⟩ by hand, and then the trace of the R-charge projector recovers those same cos ratios and is described as the algebra 'knowing' the BPS counts. The rest of the paper, including the pure Lorentzian derivation of the bosonic JT boundary algebras, has independent content and is not rendered circular by this consistency argument.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard mathematical machinery plus several stated assumptions about the matter theory and, crucially, the factor property of the projected algebras. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or other invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • R-charge periodicity integer N = unspecified positive integer, period 4*pi*N for the Wilson line phase a
    Section 4.1 states that the choice of N is a free parameter of the super-JT theory; the allowed set of boundary R-charges JR and the precise ground-state counting depend on this choice.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Spectral theory and self-adjointness of fSL(2,R) generators, with specific boundary conditions for representations with 0<lambda<1 and u<1/2.
    Used in Sections 2.3 and 4.3-4.4 to define the correct representations and to exclude spurious 'excess' eigenfunctions.
  • standard math Representation theory of fSL(2,R), gSU(1,1|1), and von Neumann algebra classification, including Type I, Type II_oo and Type II_1 factors, traces, and commutants.
    Foundational throughout Sections 3 and 5; the paper assumes the standard classification and module theory for von Neumann factors.
  • domain assumption The matter theory is an algebraic QFT on AdS2 admitting boundary primaries with scaling dimensions Delta_i, R-charges q_i, and three-point couplings C_ijk.
    Assumed in Sections 3.1 and 5.2 via the state-boundary operator correspondence and the axioms of a CFT_1 or SCFT_1.
  • domain assumption Every state of the super-JT Hilbert space can be prepared by a Euclidean gravitational path integral, making the trace in Eq. (5.13) well-defined and cyclic.
    The paper relies on this in Section 5.2 and does not prove it within the Lorentzian canonical framework.
  • ad hoc to paper The projected ground-state algebras eAR,0 and eAR are von Neumann factors.
    Explicitly assumed in Sections 5.3 and 5.4; without it the uniqueness of the trace and the Type II_1 factor structure are not established.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Algebras and states in super-JT gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5ICQERGP

@misc{pith2026241215549,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Algebras and states in super-JT gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5ICQERGP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15549}
}
abstract

In bosonic JT gravity, minimally coupled to bulk matter, there exists a single, delta-function-normalisable state in each $SL(2,R)$ representation of the matter QFT for any pair of positive energies $E_L, E_R$ at the left and right boundaries. In $\mathcal{N} = 2$ super-JT gravity coupled to matter, we show that there exists a single normalisable state in each $SU(1,1|1)$ matter representation (given appropriate R-charges) that has exactly zero energy at both boundaries. For non-BPS representations, these states have the peculiar property that they break all supersymmetry in the bulk, while preserving supersymmetry at both boundaries. Projecting the algebras of boundary observables onto these zero-energy states leads to a Type II$_1$ von Neumann factor at each boundary that contains a single operator for each supersymmetric matter boundary primary with sufficiently small R-charge. For neutral boundary primaries, the Type II$_1$ factor has a natural action on the matter QFT Hilbert space (with no additional gravitational degrees of freedom) such that the QFT vacuum is the unique tracial state. Moreover, the product of neutral matter operators can be found very explicitly and has a remarkably simple form. When primaries with nonzero matter R-charge are included, the trace can be written as a sum over matter vacuum expectation values associated to each allowed boundary R-charge $J_R$, with the terms in the sum weighted by $\mathrm{cos}(\pi J_R)$. In this way, the ground state algebras encode the ratios of the number of BPS microstates within each R-charge sector. In addition to the results on super-JT gravity described above, we provide a purely Lorentzian derivation of the algebraic structure of canonically quantised (bosonic) JT gravity plus matter, without appeal to the Euclidean gravitational path integrals used in previous work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uniqueness of null-local modular flow

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For the free massless scalar in a Minkowski causal diamond, the vacuum is the unique state or weight in the vacuum sector whose modular flow is local on the null boundary.

  2. Geometric modular flows in 2d CFT and beyond

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In 2d CFTs, every suitably regular Unruh flow on the Rindler wedge is the modular flow of a state obtained by a conformal unitary acting on the vacuum or thermal state, and local entropy and stress-tensor formulas follow.

  3. Bulk-boundary entanglement correspondence and the Ryu-Takayanagi conjecture in an $AdS_2/CFT_1$ setup

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    For a free scalar plus Majorana field in AdS2, boundary thermofield-double entanglement entropy matches, up to additive constants, the bulk horizon entanglement entropy and the log of a near-boundary geodesic length.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Bekenstein

    Jacob D. Bekenstein. Black Holes and Entropy. Phys. Rev., D7:2333–2346, 1973

    work page 1973

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hawking. Particle Creation by Black Holes. Commun. Math. Phys. , 43:199–220, 1975. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy

    Andrew Strominger and Cumrun Vafa. Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. Phys. Lett. B , 379:99–104, 1996

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking. Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D , 15:2752–2756, May 1977

    work page 1977

  5. [5]

    Gravity and the crossed product

    Edward Witten. Gravity and the crossed product. JHEP, 10:008, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Large N algebras and generalized entropy

    Venkatesa Chandrasekaran, Geoff Penington, and Edward Witten. Large N algebras and generalized entropy. JHEP, 04:009, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality

    Samuel Leutheusser and Hong Liu. Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality. 10 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Emergent times in holographic duality

    Samuel Leutheusser and Hong Liu. Emergent times in holographic duality. 12 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    An Algebra of Observables for de Sitter Space

    Venkatesa Chandrasekaran, Roberto Longo, Geoff Penington, and Edward Witten. An Algebra of Observables for de Sitter Space. 6 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Subalgebra-subregion duality: emergence of space and time in holography

    Samuel Leutheusser and Hong Liu. Subalgebra-subregion duality: emergence of space and time in holography. 12 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    Algebras, regions, and observers

    Edward Witten. Algebras, regions, and observers. Proc. Symp. Pure Math. , 107:247–276, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Speranza

    Kristan Jensen, Jonathan Sorce, and Antony J. Speranza. Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity. JHEP, 12:020, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity

    Edward Witten. A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity. JHEP, 03:077, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Generalized Black Hole Entropy is von Neumann Entropy

    Jonah Kudler-Flam, Samuel Leutheusser, and Gautam Satishchandran. Generalized Black Hole Entropy is von Neumann Entropy. 9 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    Relative state-counting for semiclassical black holes

    Chris Akers and Jonathan Sorce. Relative state-counting for semiclassical black holes. 4 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    A clock is just a way to tell the time: gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes

    Chang-Han Chen and Geoff Penington. A clock is just a way to tell the time: gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02116 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Algebraic Observational Cosmology

    Jonah Kudler-Flam, Samuel Leutheusser, and Gautam Satishchandran. Algebraic Observational Cosmology. 6 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    R. Jackiw. Lower Dimensional Gravity. Nucl. Phys. B , 252:343–356, 1985

    1985

  11. [19]

    Teitelboim

    C. Teitelboim. Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions. Phys. Lett. B , 126:41–45, 1983

    1983

  12. [20]

    Algebras and states in jt gravity

    Geoff Penington and Edward Witten. Algebras and states in jt gravity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07257, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    von neumann algebras in jt gravity

    David K Kolchmeyer. von neumann algebras in jt gravity. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2023(6):1–50, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy

    Shinsei Ryu and Tadashi Takayanagi. Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy. JHEP, 08:045, 2006. – 86 –

    2006

  15. [23]

    Hubeny, Mukund Rangamani, and Tadashi Takayanagi

    Veronika E. Hubeny, Mukund Rangamani, and Tadashi Takayanagi. A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal. JHEP, 07:062, 2007

    2007

  16. [24]

    Generalized gravitational entropy

    Aitor Lewkowycz and Juan Maldacena. Generalized gravitational entropy. JHEP, 08:090, 2013

    2013

  17. [25]

    Quantum Corrections to Holographic Entanglement Entropy

    Thomas Faulkner, Aitor Lewkowycz, and Juan Maldacena. Quantum Corrections to Holographic Entanglement Entropy. JHEP, 11:074, 2013

    2013

  18. [26]

    Netta Engelhardt and Aron C. Wall. Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy Beyond the Classical Regime. JHEP, 01:073, 2015

    2015

  19. [27]

    Supersymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models

    Wenbo Fu, Davide Gaiotto, Juan Maldacena, and Subir Sachdev. Supersymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models. Phys. Rev. D , 95(2):026009, 2017. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 069904 (2017)]

    2017

  20. [28]

    Lin, Juan Maldacena, Liza Rozenberg, and Jieru Shan

    Henry W. Lin, Juan Maldacena, Liza Rozenberg, and Jieru Shan. Holography for people with no time. SciPost Phys. , 14(6):150, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Lin, Juan Maldacena, Liza Rozenberg, and Jieru Shan

    Henry W. Lin, Juan Maldacena, Liza Rozenberg, and Jieru Shan. Looking at supersymmetric black holes for a very long time. SciPost Phys. , 14(5):128, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    Supersymmetric sachdev-ye-kitaev models

    Wenbo Fu, Davide Gaiotto, Juan Maldacena, and Subir Sachdev. Supersymmetric sachdev-ye-kitaev models. Physical Review D , 95(2):026009, 2017

    2017

  23. [31]

    Fermionic localization of the schwarzian theory

    Douglas Stanford and Edward Witten. Fermionic localization of the schwarzian theory. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2017(10):1–28, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    van Rees

    Christopher Beem, Madalena Lemos, Pedro Liendo, Wolfger Peelaers, Leonardo Rastelli, and Balt C. van Rees. Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions. Commun. Math. Phys. , 336(3):1359–1433, 2015

    2015

  25. [33]

    Henry W. Lin. The bulk Hilbert space of double scaled SYK. JHEP, 11:060, 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Lin and Douglas Stanford

    Henry W. Lin and Douglas Stanford. A symmetry algebra in double-scaled SYK. SciPost Phys., 15(6):234, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Models of ads2 backreaction and holography

    Ahmed Almheiri and Joseph Polchinski. Models of ads2 backreaction and holography. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2015(11):1–19, 2015

    2015

  28. [36]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space

    Juan Maldacena, Douglas Stanford, and Zhenbin Yang. Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space. PTEP, 2016(12):12C104, 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    Josephine Suh

    Alexei Kitaev and S. Josephine Suh. Statistical mechanics of a two-dimensional black hole. JHEP, 05:198, 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity

    Daniel Harlow and Daniel Jafferis. The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity. JHEP, 02:177, 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes

    Zhenbin Yang. The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes. JHEP, 05:205, 2019

    2019

  32. [40]

    Shenker, and Douglas Stanford

    Phil Saad, Stephen H. Shenker, and Douglas Stanford. JT gravity as a matrix integral. 3 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    Lin, Juan Maldacena, and Ying Zhao

    Henry W. Lin, Juan Maldacena, and Ying Zhao. Symmetries Near the Horizon. JHEP, 08:049, 2019

    2019

  34. [42]

    Kolchmeyer

    Daniel Louis Jafferis and David K. Kolchmeyer. Entanglement Entropy in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity. 11 2019. – 87 –

    2019

  35. [43]

    Algebra of diffeomorphism-invariant observables in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity

    Daniel Harlow and Jie-qiang Wu. Algebra of diffeomorphism-invariant observables in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity. JHEP, 05:097, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    Kolchmeyer, Baur Mukhametzhanov, and Julian Sonner

    Daniel Louis Jafferis, David K. Kolchmeyer, Baur Mukhametzhanov, and Julian Sonner. Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with matter, generalized eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and random matrices. Phys. Rev. D , 108(6):066015, 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    A Uniqueness theorem for constraint quantization

    Domenico Giulini and Donald Marolf. A Uniqueness theorem for constraint quantization. Class. Quant. Grav. , 16:2489–2505, 1999

    1999

  38. [46]

    Donald Marolf. Group averaging and refined algebraic quantization: Where are we now? In 9th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Gravitation and Relativistic Field Theories (MG 9) , 7 2000

    2000

  39. [47]

    JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory

    Douglas Stanford and Edward Witten. JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 24(6):1475–1680, 2020

    2020

  40. [48]

    Iliesiu, Gustavo J

    Matthew Heydeman, Luca V. Iliesiu, Gustavo J. Turiaci, and Wenli Zhao. The statistical mechanics of near-BPS black holes. J. Phys. A , 55(1):014004, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    Yale Fan and Thomas G. Mertens. Supergroup structure of Jackiw-Teitelboim supergravity. JHEP, 08:002, 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    Turiaci and Edward Witten

    Gustavo J. Turiaci and Edward Witten. N = 2 JT supergravity and matrix models. JHEP, 12:003, 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    Lin, and Cynthia Yan

    Jan Boruch, Henry W. Lin, and Cynthia Yan. Exploring supersymmetric wormholes in N = 2 SYK with chords. JHEP, 12:151, 2023

    2023

  44. [52]

    The conformal bootstrap

    David Simmons-Duffin. The conformal bootstrap. In New Frontiers in Fields and Strings: TASI 2015 Proceedings of the 2015 Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics , pages 1–74. World Scientific, 2017

    2015

  45. [53]

    The conformal bootstrap: Theory, numerical techniques, and applications

    David Poland, Slava Rychkov, and Alessandro Vichi. The conformal bootstrap: Theory, numerical techniques, and applications. Reviews of Modern Physics , 91(1):015002, 2019

    2019

  46. [54]

    Comments on the sachdev-ye-kitaev model

    Juan Maldacena and Douglas Stanford. Comments on the sachdev-ye-kitaev model. Phys. Rev. D, 94:106002, 2016. – 88 –

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.