pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.12925 · v2 · pith:W365R6LPnew · submitted 2025-01-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · cond-mat.str-el· physics.comp-ph

A Denser Hydrogen Inferred from First-Principles Simulations Challenges Jupiter's Interior Models

Cesare Cozza , Kousuke Nakano , Saburo Howard , Hao Xie , Ravit Helled , Guglielmo Mazzola This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 05:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP cond-mat.str-elphysics.comp-ph
keywords hydrogen equation of stateJupiter interior modelsdensity functional theoryquantum Monte Carloplanetary metallicitydense hydrogen
0
0 comments X

The pith

Simulations show hydrogen is denser at Jupiter conditions than standard models assume, implying lower bulk metallicity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper conducts Density Functional Theory and quantum Monte Carlo simulations to determine the equation of state of dense hydrogen. Different functionals produce qualitatively different pressure results, but validation against variational and diffusion Monte Carlo restores reliability. The validated simulations indicate hydrogen is denser at the pressures and temperatures inside gas giants than in equations of state currently used for modeling. This leads to the conclusion that Jupiter requires a lower bulk metallicity, meaning a smaller total mass of heavy elements, to match its observed properties. The result also increases the inconsistency between the atmospheric metallicity measured by the Galileo probe and the envelope metallicity inferred from interior models.

Core claim

Our simulations provide evidence that hydrogen is denser at planetary conditions, compared to currently used equations of state. For Jupiter, this implies a lower bulk metallicity (i.e., a smaller mass of heavy elements). Our results further amplify the inconsistency between Jupiter's atmospheric metallicity measured by the Galileo probe and the envelope metallicity inferred from interior models.

What carries the argument

Density functional theory functionals for the hydrogen equation of state validated against variational and diffusion Monte Carlo calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The density functionals selected after quantum Monte Carlo validation accurately capture the true equation of state of hydrogen across the full range of planetary pressures and temperatures without residual systematic bias.

What would settle it

An independent high-accuracy calculation or experiment measuring the density of liquid hydrogen at pressures of hundreds of GPa and temperatures of several thousand K that matches the lower densities from existing equations of state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.12925 by Cesare Cozza, Guglielmo Mazzola, Hao Xie, Kousuke Nakano, Ravit Helled, Saburo Howard.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The comparison between pressures computed by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The comparison between pressures computed by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The comparison between Pressures computed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Liquid-liquid phase transition obtained with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Vibrational ground state energy and wavefunction of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Same as Fig. 7 but correcting for electronic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. A comparison of adiabats obtained with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_24.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

First-principle modeling of dense hydrogen is crucial in materials and planetary sciences. Despite its apparent simplicity, predicting the ionic and electronic structure of hydrogen is a formidable challenge, and it is connected with the insulator-to-metal transition, a century-old problem in condensed matter. Accurate simulations of liquid hydrogen are also essential for modeling gas giant planets. Here we perform an exhaustive study of the equation of state of hydrogen using Density Functional Theory and quantum Monte Carlo simulations. We find that the pressure predicted by Density Functional Theory may vary qualitatively when using different functionals. The predictive power of first-principle simulations is restored by validating each functional against higher-level wavefunction theories, represented by computationally intensive variational and diffusion Monte Carlo calculations. Our simulations provide evidence that hydrogen is denser at planetary conditions, compared to currently used equations of state. For Jupiter, this implies a lower bulk metallicity (i.e., a smaller mass of heavy elements). Our results further amplify the inconsistency between Jupiter's atmospheric metallicity measured by the Galileo probe and the envelope metallicity inferred from interior models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an exhaustive first-principles study of the equation of state of dense hydrogen using Density Functional Theory (DFT) and quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods. By validating various DFT functionals against variational and diffusion Monte Carlo calculations, the authors find that hydrogen is denser at the pressure-temperature conditions relevant to gas giant planets than predicted by currently used equations of state. This leads to the conclusion that Jupiter's bulk metallicity must be lower, exacerbating the discrepancy with its atmospheric metallicity measured by the Galileo probe.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work would require revisions to standard interior models of Jupiter and other gas giants by implying a smaller total mass of heavy elements. The explicit anchoring in QMC validation (rather than direct fitting to planetary data) and the parameter-free character of the density comparison are strengths that would elevate the credibility of first-principles constraints in planetary science.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and functional validation paragraph] Abstract, paragraph on functional validation: the manuscript states that predictive power is restored by QMC validation at selected points, yet provides no quantitative error bars on the DFT-QMC density differences, no convergence tests with respect to system size or k-point sampling, and no explicit assessment of residual bias when extrapolating across the full planetary P-T range. This directly affects the load-bearing claim that hydrogen is systematically denser than current EOS.
minor comments (2)
  1. Add explicit statements of the finite-size corrections applied in the QMC calculations and how they propagate into the reported densities.
  2. Clarify in the methods section which specific DFT functionals were retained after the QMC comparison and the quantitative selection criterion used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. The single major comment raises valid points about the presentation of our validation procedures. We address it below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested quantitative details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and functional validation paragraph] Abstract, paragraph on functional validation: the manuscript states that predictive power is restored by QMC validation at selected points, yet provides no quantitative error bars on the DFT-QMC density differences, no convergence tests with respect to system size or k-point sampling, and no explicit assessment of residual bias when extrapolating across the full planetary P-T range. This directly affects the load-bearing claim that hydrogen is systematically denser than current EOS.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript would benefit from more explicit quantification. In the revised version we will add (i) quantitative error bars on all reported DFT-QMC density differences, obtained directly from the statistical uncertainties of the QMC runs; (ii) a new appendix or supplementary section documenting convergence tests with respect to system size (including results up to 128–256 atoms) and k-point sampling for the DFT calculations; and (iii) an explicit discussion of possible residual bias when extrapolating across the planetary P-T range, including a sensitivity analysis of how plausible bias levels would affect the inferred Jupiter metallicity. These additions will be placed in the main text or supplementary material as appropriate to support the central claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper's central result follows from direct first-principles DFT simulations whose functionals are validated at selected points by independent variational and diffusion Monte Carlo calculations. No parameter is fitted to Jupiter interior data, no prediction is defined in terms of the target density or metallicity, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation or ansatz imported from the same authors. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents exhaustive extraction; the central claim rests on the domain assumption that QMC-validated DFT functionals are sufficiently accurate for the hydrogen EOS at megabar pressures.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Density-functional approximations, once benchmarked against variational and diffusion Monte Carlo, yield reliable pressures and densities for dense liquid hydrogen.
    Invoked to restore predictive power after noting that different functionals give qualitatively different pressures.
  • domain assumption Quantum Monte Carlo calculations provide a higher-accuracy reference for the hydrogen equation of state.
    Used as the validation standard for selecting DFT functionals.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5737 in / 1277 out tokens · 35095 ms · 2026-05-23T05:33:37.285790+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Neural Wave Functions for High-Pressure Atomic Hydrogen

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Neural quantum states yield Born-Oppenheimer and non-Born-Oppenheimer energies for high-pressure atomic hydrogen that match or beat prior projector Monte Carlo results up to 128 atoms while avoiding symmetry assumptio...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

166 extracted references · 166 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Note that the heavy-element mass fraction (i.e., the envelope metallicity) is assumed to be the same in the inner and outer envelopes

    for further details). Note that the heavy-element mass fraction (i.e., the envelope metallicity) is assumed to be the same in the inner and outer envelopes. The left panel of Figure 8 shows the inferred equatorial radius and J2 for the Jupiter model with the MH13 EoS (blue star). Using CEPAM [137], we calculated a similar Jupiter model with SCAN+vv10 (ora...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    J. M. McMahon, M. A. Morales, C. Pierleoni, and D. M. Ceperley, The properties of hydrogen and helium under extreme conditions, Reviews of Modern Physics84, 1607 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Helled, G

    R. Helled, G. Mazzola, and R. Redmer, Understanding dense hydrogen at planetary conditions, Nature Reviews Physics2, 562 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Wigner and H

    E. Wigner and H. B. Huntington, On the possibility of a metallic modification of hydrogen, The Journal of Chemical Physics3, 764 (1935)

    work page 1935

  5. [5]

    physical minimum

    V. L. Ginzburg, Nobel lecture: On superconductivity and superfluidity (what i have and have not managed to do) as well as on the “physical minimum” at the beginning of the xxi century, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 981 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Dalladay-Simpson, R

    P. Dalladay-Simpson, R. T. Howie, and E. Gregoryanz, Evidence for a new phase of dense hydrogen above 325 gigapascals, Nature529, 63 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    R. P. Dias and I. F. Silvera, Observation of the wigner- huntington transition to metallic hydrogen, Science 10.1126/science.aal1579 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aal1579 2017

  8. [8]

    Loubeyre, F

    P. Loubeyre, F. Occelli, and P. Dumas, Synchrotron infrared spectroscopic evidence of the probable transition to metal hydrogen, Nature577, 631 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    S. Weir, A. Mitchell, and W. Nellis, Metallization of fluid molecular hydrogen at 140 gpa (1.4 mbar), Physical Review Letters76, 1860 (1996)

    work page 1996

  10. [10]

    P. M. Celliers, M. Millot, S. Brygoo, R. S. McWilliams, D. E. Fratanduono, J. R. Rygg, A. F. Goncharov, P. Loubeyre, J. H. Eggert, J. L. Peterson, N. B. Meezan, S. Le Pape, G. W. Collins, R. Jeanloz, and R. J. Hemley, Insulator-metal transition in dense fluid deuterium, Science361, 677 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Knudson, M

    M. Knudson, M. Desjarlais, A. Becker, R. Lemke, K. Cochrane, M. Savage, D. Bliss, T. Mattsson, and R. Redmer, Direct observation of an abrupt insulator- to-metal transition in dense liquid deuterium, Science 348, 1455 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    L¨ uhr, J

    H. L¨ uhr, J. Wicht, S. A. Gilder, and M. Holschneider, Magnetic Fields in the Solar System, Vol. 448 (Springer, 2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Helled and J

    R. Helled and J. J. Fortney, The interiors of Uranus and Neptune: current understanding and open questions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A378, 20190474 (2020), arXiv:2007.10783 [astro-ph.EP]

    work page arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Howard, R

    S. Howard, R. Helled, and S. M¨ uller, Giant exoplanet composition: The impact of the hydrogen–helium equation of state and interior structure, Astronomy and Astrophysics693, L7 (2025), arXiv:2410.21382 [astro- ph.EP]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Durante, M

    D. Durante, M. Parisi, D. Serra, M. Zannoni, V. Notaro, P. Racioppa, D. R. Buccino, G. Lari, L. Gomez Casajus, L. Iess, W. M. Folkner, G. Tommei, P. Tortora, and S. J. Bolton, Jupiter’s Gravity Field Halfway Through the Juno Mission, Geophysical Research Letter47, e86572 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    L. Iess, B. Militzer, Y. Kaspi, P. Nicholson, D. Durante, P. Racioppa, A. Anabtawi, E. Galanti, W. Hubbard, M. J. Mariani, P. Tortora, S. Wahl, and M. Zannoni, Measurement and implications of Saturn’s gravity field and ring mass, Science364, aat2965 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Helled and S

    R. Helled and S. Howard, Giant planet interiors and atmospheres, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2407.05853 (2024), arXiv:2407.05853 [astro-ph.EP]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Miguel, T

    Y. Miguel, T. Guillot, and L. Fayon, Jupiter internal structure: the effect of different equations of state, A&A 596, A114 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Howard, T

    S. Howard, T. Guillot, M. Bazot, Y. Miguel, D. J. Stevenson, E. Galanti, Y. Kaspi, W. B. Hubbard, B. Militzer, R. Helled, N. Nettelmann, B. Idini, and S. Bolton, Jupiter’s interior from Juno: Equation-of- state uncertainties and dilute core extent, Astronomy and Astrophysics672, A33 (2023), arXiv:2302.09082 [astro-ph.EP]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Miguel, M

    Y. Miguel, M. Bazot, T. Guillot, S. Howard, E. Galanti, Y. Kaspi, W. B. Hubbard, B. Militzer, R. Helled, S. K. Atreya, J. E. P. Connerney, D. Durante, L. Kulowski, J. I. Lunine, D. Stevenson, and S. Bolton, Jupiter’s inhomogeneous envelope, Astronomy & Astrophysics 662, A18 (2022), arXiv:2203.01866 [astro-ph.EP]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    S. e. a. Wahl, Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core, Geophys. Res. Lett.44, 80 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Nettelmann, N

    N. Nettelmann, N. Movshovitz, D. Ni, J. J. Fortney, E. Galanti, Y. Kaspi, R. Helled, C. R. Mankovich, and S. Bolton, Theory of Figures to the Seventh Order and the Interiors of Jupiter and Saturn, The Planetary Science Journal2, 241 (2021), arXiv:2110.15452 [astro- ph.EP]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Militzer, W

    B. Militzer, W. B. Hubbard, S. Wahl, J. I. Lunine, E. Galanti, Y. Kaspi, Y. Miguel, T. Guillot, K. M. Moore, M. Parisi, J. E. P. Connerney, R. Helled, H. Cao, C. Mankovich, D. J. Stevenson, R. S. Park, M. Wong, S. K. Atreya, J. Anderson, and S. J. Bolton, Juno Spacecraft Measurements of Jupiter’s Gravity Imply a Dilute Core, The Planetary Science Journal3...

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    D. J. Stevenson, Jupiter’s Interior as Revealed by Juno, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences48, 465 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    M. D. Knudson, M. P. Desjarlais, R. W. Lemke, T. R. Mattsson, M. French, N. Nettelmann, and R. Redmer, Probing the interiors of the ice giants: Shock compression of water to 700 gpa and 3.8g/cm 3, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 091102 (2012)

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    M. D. Knudson, D. L. Hanson, J. E. Bailey, C. A. Hall, J. R. Asay, and C. Deeney, Principal Hugoniot, reverberating wave, and mechanical reshock measurements of liquid deuterium to 400 GPa using plate impact techniques, Phys. Rev. B69, 144209 (2004)

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    D. G. Hicks, T. R. Boehly, P. M. Celliers, J. H. Eggert, S. J. Moon, D. D. Meyerhofer, and G. W. Collins, Laser- driven single shock compression of fluid deuterium from 45 to 220 GPa, Phys. Rev. B79, 014112 (2009)

    work page 2009

  28. [28]

    Saumon, G

    D. Saumon, G. Chabrier, and H. M. van Horn, An equation of state for low-mass stars and giant planets, Astrophysical Journal Supplement v. 99, p. 71399, 713 (1995)

    work page 1995

  29. [29]

    Nettelmann, A

    N. Nettelmann, A. Becker, B. Holst, and R. Redmer, Jupiter models with improved ab initio hydrogen 28 equation of state (h-reos.2), The Astrophysical Journal 750, 52 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    Militzer and W

    B. Militzer and W. B. Hubbard, Ab initio equation of state for hydrogen-helium mixtures with recalibration of the giant-planet mass-radius relation, The Astrophysical Journal774, 148 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Miguel, Y., Guillot, T., and Fayon, L., Jupiter internal structure: the effect of different equations of state (corrigendum), A&A618, C2 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    H. Xie, S. Howard, and G. Mazzola, Accurate and thermodynamically consistent hydrogen equation of state for planetary modeling with flow matching (2025), arXiv:2501.10594 [astro-ph.EP]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Chabrier, S

    G. Chabrier, S. Mazevet, and F. Soubiran, A new equation of state for dense hydrogen–helium mixtures, The Astrophysical Journal872, 51 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Becker, W

    A. Becker, W. Lorenzen, J. J. Fortney, N. Nettelmann, M. Sch¨ ottler, and R. Redmer, Ab initio equations of state for hydrogen (h-reos. 3) and helium (he-reos. 3) and their implications for the interior of brown dwarfs, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series215, 21 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Burke, Perspective on density functional theory, The Journal of Chemical Physics136, 150901 (2012)

    K. Burke, Perspective on density functional theory, The Journal of Chemical Physics136, 150901 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Azadi and W

    S. Azadi and W. M. C. Foulkes, Fate of density functional theory in the study of high-pressure solid hydrogen, Physical Review B88, 014115 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Mazzola, R

    G. Mazzola, R. Helled, and S. Sorella, Phase diagram of hydrogen and a hydrogen-helium mixture at planetary conditions by quantum monte carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 025701 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Pierleoni, M

    C. Pierleoni, M. A. Morales, G. Rillo, M. Holzmann, and D. M. Ceperley, Liquid–liquid phase transition in hydrogen by coupled electron–ion monte carlo simulations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 4953 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    R. C. Clay, J. Mcminis, J. M. McMahon, C. Pierleoni, D. M. Ceperley, and M. A. Morales, Benchmarking exchange-correlation functionals for hydrogen at high pressures using quantum monte carlo, Phys. Rev. B89, 184106 (2014)

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    M. D. Knudson, M. P. Desjarlais, M. Preising, and R. Redmer, Evaluation of exchange-correlation functionals with multiple-shock conductivity measurements in hydrogen and deuterium at the molecular-to-atomic transition, Phys. Rev. B98, 174110 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Bonitz, J

    M. Bonitz, J. Vorberger, M. Bethkenhagen, M. P. B¨ ohme, D. M. Ceperley, A. Filinov, T. Gawne, F. Graziani, G. Gregori, P. Hamann, S. B. Hansen, M. Holzmann, S. X. Hu, H. K¨ ahlert, V. V. Karasiev, U. Kleinschmidt, L. Kordts, C. Makait, B. Militzer, Z. A. Moldabekov, C. Pierleoni, M. Preising, K. Ramakrishna, R. Redmer, S. Schwalbe, P. Svensson, and T. Do...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0219405 2024

  42. [42]

    Van De Bund, H

    S. Van De Bund, H. Wiebe, and G. J. Ackland, Isotope quantum effects in the metallization transition in liquid hydrogen, Physical Review Letters126, 225701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Zaghoo, R

    M. Zaghoo, R. J. Husband, and I. F. Silvera, Striking isotope effect on the metallization phase lines of liquid hydrogen and deuterium, Physical Review B98, 104102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Schuch and F

    N. Schuch and F. Verstraete, Computational complexity of interacting electrons and fundamental limitations of density functional theory, Nature physics5, 732 (2009)

    work page 2009

  45. [45]

    R. O. Jones, Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 897 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Lejaeghere, G

    K. Lejaeghere, G. Bihlmayer, T. Bj¨ orkman, P. Blaha, S. Bl¨ ugel, V. Blum, D. Caliste, I. E. Castelli, S. J. Clark, A. Dal Corso,et al., Reproducibility in density functional theory calculations of solids, Science351, aad3000 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    Bosoni, L

    E. Bosoni, L. Beal, M. Bercx, P. Blaha, S. Bl¨ ugel, J. Br¨ oder, M. Callsen, S. Cottenier, A. Degomme, V. Dikan, K. Eimre, E. Flage-Larsen, M. Fornari, A. Garcia, L. Genovese, M. Giantomassi, S. P. Huber, H. Janssen, G. Kastlunger, M. Krack, G. Kresse, T. D. K¨ uhne, K. Lejaeghere, G. K. H. Madsen, M. Marsman, N. Marzari, G. Michalicek, H. Mirhosseini, T...

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev.136, B864 (1964)

    work page 1964

  49. [49]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

    work page 1965

  50. [50]

    R. M. Martin,Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods(Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    work page 2004

  51. [51]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  52. [52]

    Chabrier and F

    G. Chabrier and F. Debras, A new equation of state for dense hydrogen–helium mixtures. ii. taking into account hydrogen–helium interactions, The Astrophysical Journal917, 4 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    A. D. Becke, Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior, Physical review A38, 3098 (1988)

    work page 1988

  54. [54]

    C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Development of the colle-salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density, Physical review B37, 785 (1988)

    work page 1988

  55. [55]

    M. Dion, H. Rydberg, E. Schr¨ oder, D. C. Langreth, and B. I. Lundqvist, Van der waals density functional for general geometries, Physical review letters92, 246401 (2004)

    work page 2004

  56. [56]

    Thonhauser, S

    T. Thonhauser, S. Zuluaga, C. Arter, K. Berland, E. Schr¨ oder, and P. Hyldgaard, Spin signature of nonlocal correlation binding in metal-organic frameworks, Physical review letters115, 136402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    K. Lee, ´E. D. Murray, L. Kong, B. I. Lundqvist, and D. C. Langreth, Higher-accuracy van der waals density functional, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics82, 081101 (2010)

    work page 2010

  58. [58]

    J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. P. Perdew, Strongly constrained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional, Physical review letters115, 036402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    H.-C. Yang, K. Liu, Z.-Y. Lu, and H.-Q. Lin, First- principles study of solid hydrogen: Comparison among 29 four exchange-correlation functionals, Phys. Rev. B 102, 174109 (2020)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    Sch¨ ottler and R

    M. Sch¨ ottler and R. Redmer, Ab initio calculation of the miscibility diagram for hydrogen-helium mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 115703 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    Azadi and G

    S. Azadi and G. J. Ackland, The role of van der waals and exchange interactions in high-pressure solid hydrogen, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics19, 21829 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    B. Lu, D. Kang, D. Wang, T. Gao, and J. Dai, Towards the same line of liquid–liquid phase transition of dense hydrogen from various theoretical predictions, Chinese Physics Letters36, 103102 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    J. Hinz, V. V. Karasiev, S. Hu, M. Zaghoo, D. Mej´ ıa- Rodr´ ıguez, S. Trickey, and L. Calder´ ın, Fully consistent density functional theory determination of the insulator- metal transition boundary in warm dense hydrogen, Physical Review Research2, 032065 (2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Zaghoo, A

    M. Zaghoo, A. Salamat, and I. F. Silvera, Evidence of a first-order phase transition to metallic hydrogen, Physical Review B93, 155128 (2016)

    work page 2016

  65. [65]

    Zaghoo and I

    M. Zaghoo and I. F. Silvera, Conductivity and dissociation in liquid metallic hydrogen and implications for planetary interiors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 11873 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    C. Ji, B. Li, W. Liu, J. S. Smith, A. Majumdar, W. Luo, R. Ahuja, J. Shu, J. Wang, S. Sinogeikin,et al., Ultrahigh-pressure isostructural electronic transitions in hydrogen, Nature573, 558 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    M. A. Morales, J. M. McMahon, C. Pierleoni, and D. M. Ceperley, Nuclear quantum effects and nonlocal exchange-correlation functionals applied to liquid hydrogen at high pressure, Physical Review Letters110, 065702 (2013)

    work page 2013

  68. [68]

    H. Y. Geng, Q. Wu, M. Marqu´ es, and G. J. Ackland, Thermodynamic anomalies and three distinct liquid- liquid transitions in warm dense liquid hydrogen, Phys. Rev. B100, 134109 (2019)

    work page 2019

  69. [69]

    R. C. Clay III, M. Holzmann, D. M. Ceperley, and M. A. Morales, Benchmarking density functionals for hydrogen-helium mixtures with quantum monte carlo: Energetics, pressures, and forces, Physical Review B93, 035121 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-S´ anchez, and W. Yang, Challenges for density functional theory, Chemical Reviews112, 289 (2011)

    work page 2011

  71. [71]

    L. O. Wagner, E. Stoudenmire, K. Burke, and S. R. White, Reference electronic structure calculations in one dimension, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics14, 8581 (2012)

    work page 2012

  72. [72]

    Motta, D

    M. Motta, D. M. Ceperley, G. K.-L. Chan, J. A. Gomez, E. Gull, S. Guo, C. A. Jim´ enez-Hoyos, T. N. Lan, J. Li, F. Ma, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof’ev, U. Ray, G. E. Scuseria, S. Sorella, E. M. Stoudenmire, Q. Sun, I. S. Tupitsyn, S. R. White, D. Zgid, and S. Zhang (Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem), Towards the solution of the many-electro...

    work page 2017

  73. [73]

    Dubeckyy, L

    M. Dubeckyy, L. Mitas, and P. Jurecka, Noncovalent interactions by quantum monte carlo, Chemical reviews 116, 5188 (2016)

    work page 2016

  74. [74]

    M. J. Gillan, D. Alf` e, and A. Michaelides, Perspective: How good is dft for water?, The Journal of Chemical Physics144, 130901 (2016)

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    W. M. C. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. J. Needs, and G. Rajagopal, Quantum monte carlo simulations of solids, Reviews of Modern Physics73, 33 (2001)

    work page 2001

  76. [76]

    Nakano, C

    K. Nakano, C. Attaccalite, M. Barborini, L. Capriotti, M. Casula, E. Coccia, M. Dagrada, C. Genovese, Y. Luo, G. Mazzola, A. Zen, and S. Sorella, Turborvb: A many-body toolkit for ab initio electronic simulations by quantum monte carlo, J. Chem. Phys.152, 204121 (2020)

    work page 2020

  77. [77]

    Szabo and N

    A. Szabo and N. S. Ostlund,Modern quantum chemistry: introduction to advanced electronic structure theory(Courier Corporation, 2012)

    work page 2012

  78. [78]

    K. E. Riley, M. Pitonak, P. Jurecka, and P. Hobza, Stabilization and structure calculations for noncovalent interactions in extended molecular systems based on wave function and density functional theories, Chemical Reviews110, 5023 (2010), pMID: 20486691, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr1000173

    work page doi:10.1021/cr1000173 2010

  79. [79]

    Casula, C

    M. Casula, C. Filippi, and S. Sorella, Diffusion Monte Carlo method with lattice regularization, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 1 (2005)

    work page 2005

  80. [80]

    Nakano, O

    K. Nakano, O. Kohul´ ak, A. Raghav, M. Casula, and S. Sorella, TurboGenius: Python suite for high- throughput calculations of ab initio quantum Monte Carlo methods, J. Chem. Phys.159, 224801 (2023)

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.