Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 6 cited by

How deep is the dip and how tall are the wiggles in inflationary power spectra?

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a large-scale dip in the single-field inflationary curvature power spectrum appears exactly when the inflaton's velocity never changes sign, and that peak height scales as the inverse square of dip depth.

desk verdict Solid analytic paper on spectral features in single-field PBH models; the peak-dip relation holds in the strong-enhancement regime, but the 'if and only if' dip criterion is overstated. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14681 v3 pith:2VZTRHT2 submitted 2025-01-24 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords primordialblackholesultra-slow-rollinflationcurvaturepowerspectrumdip-peakrelationtransfermatrixMukhanov-SasakiequationWandsdualitynon-attractorphase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies single-field inflationary models that produce a peak in the curvature power spectrum through an ultra-slow-roll phase, the kind of peak that could seed primordial black holes. Its central claim is that such spectra obey two general rules: a large-scale dip appears exactly when the inflaton's velocity never changes sign, and the height of the peak is tied to the depth of the dip by $P_{\rm peak}/P_{\rm CMB} \propto (P_{\rm dip}/P_{\rm CMB})^{-2}$. The paper builds a transfer-matrix formalism, analogous to the S-matrix of quantum field theory, that maps scalar perturbations across the transient phase and gives controlled approximations on both sides of the peak. If correct, the results mean that any high-peak single-field model without inflaton reversal unavoidably contains a deep dip, correlating primordial black hole production with observable structure at much larger scales.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the transfer matrix $T$ (or its mode-coefficient versions $T_J$ and the Hankel-basis $T_H$), a real symplectic $2\times 2$ matrix with unit determinant that maps $(u,u')$ from before to after the transient phase, constructed from Wronskians of Bessel-basis solutions in the two constant-$\nu$ phases. The argument runs through two complementary expansions: for small scales (large $k$), $T$ is expanded in $z''/z$ by an integral-equation iteration, producing the oscillatory part of the spectrum as a Fourier transform of the transition pulse; for large scales, $T$ is expanded in $k^2$ using the growing and decaying super-Hubble solutions, with coefficients $A_2$, $A_4$, and $B_0$. The sign of $A_2$ is set by the Hadamard-regularized integral $I = H\int d\tau/z^2$, and the inverse-square dip-peak law follows from combining $k_{\rm dip}^2 = -k_I^2/A_2$ with the scale $k_{\rm NP}$ where the $k^4$ growth ends. The mechanical analogy of a particle with conserved angular momentum $L=-1/2$ in an effective potential explains qualitatively why the power spectrum never vanishes exactly and why sign-flipping $z$ suppresses the dip.

What would settle it

Compute the full linear curvature power spectrum numerically for a single-field model with an ultra-slow-roll phase that never reverses the inflaton velocity but produces only a modest peak, and check whether a large-scale dip still appears and whether a log-log plot of $P_{\rm peak}$ versus $P_{\rm dip}$ follows a straight line of slope $-2$. A model with no sign flip but no dip, or a measured dip-peak pair deviating from the inverse-square scaling beyond the stated corrections, would refute the universality of the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is a pair of universal statements about the curvature power spectrum $P_\zeta(k)$ in single-field inflation with a non-attractor (ultra-slow-roll) phase. First, a dip on the large-scale side of the peak exists if and only if the Mukhanov-Sasaki variable $z \propto \dot\phi$ does not cross zero, i.e. the inflaton never stops and reverses direction. Second, when such a dip exists and the peak is strongly enhanced, the peak amplitude scales as the inverse square of the dip amplitude, $P_{\rm peak}/P_{\rm CMB} \propto (P_{\rm dip}/P_{\rm CMB})^{-2}$, so a deeper dip means a quadratically higher peak. The dip is traced to the sign of a Hadamard-regularized integral $I = H\int d\tau'/z^2$, which controls the sign of the leading coefficient $A_2$ in a $k^2$ expansion of the power spectrum: no sign flip gives $A_2<0$ and a real dip scale, while a sign flip gives $A_2>0$ and no dip. On the small-scale side, the paper establishes that oscillations decay as a power law for $k$ below the inverse transition duration and exponentially above it, with the transition's sharpness setting the switch.

Load-bearing premise

The dip criterion and the inverse-square relation are derived under the assumptions of a strongly enhanced spectrum ($A_2^2 \gg A_4$), an initial slow-roll phase with $\nu_I = 3/2$, and the claim that the sign of the Hadamard integral $I$ is controlled by the near-zero of $z$ in the ultra-slow-roll phase; for weak or short ultra-slow-roll phases the if-and-only-if statement has not been shown.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every single-field primordial-black-hole model with a high peak and no inflaton reversal necessarily contains a deep dip at large scales.
  • The peak amplitude grows quadratically with dip depth, so measuring one constrains the other.
  • The duration of the transition sets the scale at which oscillatory damping switches from power-law to exponential, so the damping tail probes the sharpness of the slow-roll-to-ultra-slow-roll transition.
  • If the inflaton reverses (z crosses zero), no dip appears and the spectrum grows monotonically toward the peak.
  • The transfer-matrix formalism gives controlled approximations in both small-scale and large-scale regimes, providing a general tool for computing spectra across non-attractor transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the inverse-square relation holds model-independently, primordial-black-hole abundance and dip depth become linked: models tuned for PBH dark matter make a testable prediction for a suppression of power at CMB or large-scale-structure wavelengths.
  • Multi-field or non-canonical scenarios may evade the relation, so measuring the dip-peak correlation could discriminate single-field ultra-slow-roll models from alternatives.
  • Quantum diffusion and loop corrections may partially fill the dip, meaning the classical inverse-square relation is a limiting case that could be softened at the deepest part of the dip.
  • For sign-flipping backgrounds the reconstructed potential is multi-valued, so canonical single-field realizations of the no-dip branch are less straightforward than the no-reversal case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a transfer-matrix (Sp(2,R)/SU(1,1)) formalism to describe linear scalar perturbations during a transient non-attractor phase in single-field inflation. Using a large-scale expansion of the Mukhanov–Sasaki mode functions, it derives two central claims: (i) the curvature power spectrum features a dip if and only if z, hence the inflaton velocity, does not flip sign (Sec. 5.3), and (ii) the peak amplitude relates to the dip amplitude as P_peak/P_CMB ∝ (P_dip/P_CMB)^{-2} (Sec. 5.4, Eq. (5.20)). It also characterizes small-scale oscillatory features, predicting a transition from power-law to exponential damping depending on the sharpness of the transition, and it tests these predictions against an instantaneous-transition model, an exactly solvable hyperbolic-pulse model, and numerically integrated smooth models.

Significance. If correct in the stated generality, the dip criterion and the peak-dip relation provide robust, scale-correlated signatures of single-field PBH models: any high-peak model without inflaton velocity reversal would necessarily contain a deep large-scale dip, linking CMB-scale and PBH-scale observables. The transfer-matrix framework is a valuable methodological contribution, and the paper contains substantial verification: exact analytic power spectra for the instantaneous transition, an analytic toy model with explicit Bogoliubov coefficients and exponential damping, and numerical Mukhanov–Sasaki solutions that reproduce the large-scale expansion and the damping behaviour. The algebraic derivation of Eq. (5.20) is internally consistent, and the coefficients A2 and B0 are computed from the background rather than fitted to the peak or dip. The main limitation is that the universal 'if and only if' dip criterion is only established in the strong-enhancement, νI=3/2 limit, yet it is presented in the abstract and conclusions as a general result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5.3, boxed claim and Eqs. (5.13)-(5.16)] The 'if and only if' dip criterion is stated unconditionally, but the derivation assumes νI=3/2 and strong power-spectrum enhancement. In particular, Eq. (A.8) gives I = ∫_{τI}^{τII} dτ'/z(τ')² − [τII/(2νII z(τII)²)](1 ± (τII/τ*)^{2νII}); the sign of I is controlled by the velocity flip only in the limit where the first, ordinary integral is negligible, i.e. |τ*|≪|τII|. For weak or short USR phases this is not shown: the ordinary integral can dominate and make A2 negative even without a velocity flip, or positive in the presence of a flip. Moreover, even when A2<0, the dip location from Eq. (5.16) must lie within the domain of the large-scale expansion, which is only guaranteed under strong enhancement. The claim should therefore be restricted to the strong-enhancement regime, or a full proof for general parameters should be supplied.
  2. [Sec. 5.4, Eq. (5.20)] The peak-dip relation is derived under the same approximations: νI=3/2, A2²≫A4, and k_NP≈k_peak. The abstract states that the dip amplitude 'always scales' as the inverse square of the peak, but the derivation does not establish universality beyond these assumptions, and the numerical tests in Sec. 7.2 show deviations when the enhancement is less than about two orders of magnitude. The paper should state the precise domain of validity of Eq. (5.20) and give the expected correction terms, or revise the abstract and conclusions to match the proven scope.
  3. [Sec. 5.3, generic-νI claim] The text says the results 'can be easily extended to a generic νI', but no extension is shown. Since for νI≠3/2 the large-scale expansion (5.9) contains different powers of k/kI and the dip condition (5.10) changes, this claim is not verifiable from the manuscript. Either the derivation for generic νI should be provided or the assertion should be removed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'inverse square-rooted amplitude of the peak' does not describe Eq. (5.20); it should read 'the peak amplitude scales as the inverse square of the dip amplitude'.
  2. [Eqs. (5.9) and (5.12)] The coefficients A2n and B2m are sometimes written with explicit dimensions (e.g. A2/k_I², B0/k_I^{2νI}) and sometimes as dimensionless; please adopt a single convention for clarity.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption writes '1/k1.3', '1/k', and '1/k2'; these should be typeset with superscripts, e.g. k^{-1.3}, k^{-1}, and k^{-2}.
  4. [Sec. 7.1] The statement that '¯A ≲ 1' is imposed to 'avoid oscillations in z' is followed by the observation that for ¯A∈(0,1] the Legendre functions have a zero and z flips sign; please clarify the distinction between a single sign flip and genuinely oscillatory multi-zero behaviour.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the peak-dip relation and dip criterion follow from background-computed expansion coefficients and are verified by independent numerical integrations; residual concerns are scope overclaims, not circular reductions.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, I find no step where a claimed prediction reduces to its inputs by construction. The central results—the dip criterion (Sec. 5.3) and the peak-dip relation P_peak/P_CMB proportional to (P_dip/P_CMB)^-2 (Eq. 5.20)—are derived from the Mukhanov-Sasaki equation, not fitted. The large-scale expansion (5.9) has coefficients A2, A4, B0 computed as explicit background integrals (Eqs. 5.12, C.1-C.3). Under the stated strong-enhancement assumption (A2^2 >> A4, Appendix B), dip existence is identified with A2 < 0, and Eq. (A.9) ties the sign of the Hadamard integral I to the velocity flip. P_peak is estimated as the same truncation evaluated at its breakdown scale k_NP, and combining P_peak ~ A2^6/B0^4 with P_dip ~ -B0^2/A2^3 gives the inverse-square scaling algebraically. Both identifications receive independent checks: the instantaneous-transition spectrum (Sec. 6, re-derived in-paper and matching [29]), the exact hyperbolic-pulse model (Sec. 7.1), and the numerical smooth model (Sec. 7.2, Figs. 3, 5, 6) are computed directly from the mode equation, not from the truncated coefficients, so they are genuine external tests. The residual concerns are scope, not circularity: the boxed 'if and only if' criterion is stated unconditionally although the derivation assumes nu_I = 3/2, strong enhancement, and near-zero dominance of I (Eq. A.8 with |tau*| << |tau_II|); for short or weak USR phases the sign of I is not controlled by the flip alone. This is a correctness/rigor point, not an equivalence-by-construction. Self-citations ([29], [74], [75]) frame the model timeline and cite example potentials; none is load-bearing for the new claims, and the one quantitative input from [29] is independently re-derived here.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation introduces no fitted constants: A2, A4 and B0 are computed from the background z. The toy models contain hand-chosen parameters (nu_II, A, Delta_tau/tau_0, zeta_2/zeta_1) used to illustrate the effects; these are model choices, not fit parameters. No new particles, fields, or interactions are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • nu_II (final constant-roll parameter) = 2 in main examples
    Chosen by hand for the smooth and instantaneous toy models; not fit to data.
  • A (feature amplitude in z''/z) = 3.52, 3.54, 3.55, 4.09, 4.10 in examples
    Tuned in the toy models of Sec. 7.2 to produce power-spectrum enhancements of about 10^3 or more.
  • Delta_tau / |tau_0| (transition duration) = 0.005, 0.1 in Sec. 7.2; 0.1, 0.3, 0.9 in Sec. 7.1
    Set by hand to study power-law versus exponential damping of oscillations.
  • zeta_2 / zeta_1 (late-to-early amplitude ratio in instantaneous model) = small, adjusted so P_peak is about 10^-3
    Controls the strength of the enhancement in the instantaneous transition model of Sec. 6.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Bunch-Davies vacuum initial conditions for the mode functions in phase I
    Used in Eqs. (3.12) and (3.18) to set initial coefficients; deviations would alter the predicted spectral shape.
  • domain assumption The inflationary background is divided into two constant-nu phases separated by a single transitory phase, with epsilon_1 << 1 and aH approximately -1/tau
    This is the framework of Secs. 2.1 and 3.1; the Bessel-mode solutions (3.11) rely on it.
  • ad hoc to paper For the dip analysis, nu_I = 3/2 and the spectrum is strongly enhanced (A2^2 >> A4)
    These assumptions are made in Secs. 5.3 and 5.4 to obtain the dip criterion and the peak-dip relation.
  • ad hoc to paper Hadamard regularization is the correct way to handle the 1/z^2 singularity when z crosses zero
    Appendix A justifies it for smooth z''/z; the sign of A2 and hence the dip criterion depends on this regularization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of How deep is the dip and how tall are the wiggles in inflationary power spectra?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2VZTRHT2

@misc{pith2026250114681,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: How deep is the dip and how tall are the wiggles in inflationary power spectra?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2VZTRHT2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14681}
}
read the original abstract

We study linear scalar perturbations in single-field models of inflation featuring a non-attractor phase. These models lead to a peak in the curvature power spectrum that may result in the formation of primordial black holes. We develop a transfer-matrix formalism, analogous to the S-matrix program in quantum-field theory, that maps perturbations throughout the transitory phase. At scales smaller than the peak, the power spectrum features damped oscillations, and the duration of the transition sets the scale at which power-law damping switches to exponential damping. At scales larger than the peak, we demonstrate that a dip appears in the power spectrum if and only if the inflaton's velocity does not flip sign. We show that the amplitude at the dip always scales as the inverse square-rooted amplitude of the peak, and comment on the physical consequences of this universal relationship. We also test the robustness of our results with a few toy models and interpret them with an intuitive mechanical analogy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When inflationary perturbations refuse to classicalise: the role of non-Gaussianity in Wigner negativity

    gr-qc 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In ultra-slow-roll inflation, the Wigner function of the inflationary Goldstone field becomes negative and its negativity grows with the scale factor squared, so the perturbations do not automatically become classical.

  2. Axion USR Inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In axion inflation with an intermediate ultra-slow-roll phase, the instability parameter collapses at the start of USR, terminating gauge production and yielding a two-peak power spectrum with P_R ∝ k^m, m>4.

  3. The Irrelevance of Primordial Black Hole Clustering in the LVK mass range

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Initial spatial clustering of primordial black holes is irrelevant for binary mergers in the LVK mass range because FIRAS spectral-distortion constraints limit the clustering scale to below the merger-relevant separat...

  4. Reconstructing Primordial Curvature Perturbations via Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves with LISA

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LISA can reconstruct the primordial curvature power spectrum from scalar-induced gravitational waves, with percent-level precision near the peak and Bayesian tests separating SIGWs from other sources.

  5. Evolution of Linear Perturbations under Time-Dependent Hubble Friction I: SR-USR-SR Inflation

    gr-qc 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Analytic asymptotics show the dip in the SR-USR-SR curvature power spectrum comes from cancellation between two growing modes, not a constant-versus-growing cancellation.

  6. $\delta n$ formalism: A new formulation for the probability density of the curvature perturbation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A reformulation of the δN formalism that counts e-folds forward and exploits the superhorizon correlation between field and velocity to express the curvature perturbation PDF as a one-dimensional change of variables.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    A. A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity , Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99–102

  2. [2]

    Kazanas, Dynamics of the Universe and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking , Astrophys

    D. Kazanas, Dynamics of the Universe and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking , Astrophys. J. Lett. 241 (1980) L59–L63

  3. [3]

    Sato, First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe , Mon

    K. Sato, First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 195 (1981) 467–479

  4. [4]

    A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347–356

  5. [5]

    A. D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems , Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 389–393

  6. [6]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1220–1223

  7. [7]

    A. D. Linde, Chaotic Inflation , Phys. Lett. B 129 (1983) 177–181. – 35 –

  8. [8]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett. 30 (1979) 682–685

Show all 120 references
  1. [9]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe , JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532–535

  2. [10]

    S. W. Hawking, The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe , Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 295

  3. [11]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations , Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 175–178

  4. [12]

    A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1110–1113

  5. [13]

    J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt, and M. S. Turner, Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inflationary Universe , Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 679

  6. [14]

    Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass , Mon

    S. Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152 (1971) 75

  7. [15]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, Black holes in the early Universe , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168 (1974) 399–415

  8. [16]

    B. J. Carr, The Primordial black hole mass spectrum , Astrophys. J. 201 (1975) 1–19

  9. [17]

    Niikura et al., Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with Subaru/HSC Andromeda observations, Nature Astron

    H. Niikura et al., Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with Subaru/HSC Andromeda observations, Nature Astron. 3 (2019), no. 6 524–534, [ arXiv:1701.02151]

  10. [18]

    A. Katz, J. Kopp, S. Sibiryakov, and W. Xue, Femtolensing by Dark Matter Revisited , JCAP 12 (2018) 005, [ arXiv:1807.11495]

  11. [19]

    Montero-Camacho, X

    P. Montero-Camacho, X. Fang, G. Vasquez, M. Silva, and C. M. Hirata, Revisiting constraints on asteroid-mass primordial black holes as dark matter candidates , JCAP 08 (2019) 031, [arXiv:1906.05950]

  12. [20]

    Meszaros, Primeval black holes and galaxy formation , Astron

    P. Meszaros, Primeval black holes and galaxy formation , Astron. Astrophys. 38 (1975) 5–13

  13. [21]

    Duechting, Supermassive black holes from primordial black hole seeds , Phys

    N. Duechting, Supermassive black holes from primordial black hole seeds , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 064015, [ astro-ph/0406260]

  14. [22]

    Kawasaki, A

    M. Kawasaki, A. Kusenko, and T. T. Yanagida, Primordial seeds of supermassive black holes , Phys. Lett. B 711 (2012) 1–5, [ arXiv:1202.3848]

  15. [23]

    Clesse and J

    S. Clesse and J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido,Massive Primordial Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and the seeds of Galaxies , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 2 023524, [ arXiv:1501.07565]

  16. [24]

    Carr and J

    B. Carr and J. Silk, Primordial Black Holes as Generators of Cosmic Structures , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 478 (2018), no. 3 3756–3775, [ arXiv:1801.00672]

  17. [25]

    Liu and V

    B. Liu and V. Bromm, Accelerating Early Massive Galaxy Formation with Primordial Black Holes, Astrophys. J. Lett. 937 (2022), no. 2 L30, [ arXiv:2208.13178]

  18. [26]

    H¨ utsi, M

    G. H¨ utsi, M. Raidal, J. Urrutia, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae,Did JWST observe imprints of axion miniclusters or primordial black holes? , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 4 043502, [arXiv:2211.02651]

  19. [27]

    Sasaki, Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe , Prog

    M. Sasaki, Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe , Prog. Theor. Phys. 76 (1986) 1036

  20. [28]

    Dimopoulos, Ultra slow-roll inflation demystified , Phys

    K. Dimopoulos, Ultra slow-roll inflation demystified , Phys. Lett. B 775 (2017) 262–265, [arXiv:1707.05644]

  21. [29]

    Karam, N

    A. Karam, N. Koivunen, E. Tomberg, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Anatomy of single-field inflationary models for primordial black holes , JCAP 03 (2023) 013, [ arXiv:2205.13540]

  22. [30]

    Garcia-Bellido and E

    J. Garcia-Bellido and E. Ruiz Morales, Primordial black holes from single field models of inflation, Phys. Dark Univ. 18 (2017) 47–54, [ arXiv:1702.03901]. – 36 –

  23. [31]

    Kannike, L

    K. Kannike, L. Marzola, M. Raidal, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Single Field Double Inflation and Primordial Black Holes , JCAP 09 (2017) 020, [ arXiv:1705.06225]

  24. [32]

    Ballesteros and M

    G. Ballesteros and M. Taoso, Primordial black hole dark matter from single field inflation , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 2 023501, [ arXiv:1709.05565]

  25. [33]

    Germani and T

    C. Germani and T. Prokopec, On primordial black holes from an inflection point , Phys. Dark Univ. 18 (2017) 6–10, [ arXiv:1706.04226]

  26. [34]

    Motohashi and W

    H. Motohashi and W. Hu, Primordial Black Holes and Slow-Roll Violation , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 6 063503, [ arXiv:1706.06784]

  27. [35]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garcia-Bellido, and E. Ruiz Morales, Primordial Black Hole production in Critical Higgs Inflation , Phys. Lett. B 776 (2018) 345–349, [ arXiv:1705.04861]

  28. [36]

    Di and Y

    H. Di and Y. Gong, Primordial black holes and second order gravitational waves from ultra-slow-roll inflation, JCAP 07 (2018) 007, [ arXiv:1707.09578]

  29. [37]

    M. P. Hertzberg and M. Yamada, Primordial Black Holes from Polynomial Potentials in Single Field Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 8 083509, [ arXiv:1712.09750]

  30. [38]

    Rasanen and E

    S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg, Planck scale black hole dark matter from Higgs inflation , JCAP 01 (2019) 038, [ arXiv:1810.12608]

  31. [39]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. A. Diaz, and F. G. Pedro, Primordial Black Holes from String Inflation , JCAP 06 (2018) 034, [ arXiv:1803.02837]

  32. [40]

    ¨Ozsoy, S

    O. ¨Ozsoy, S. Parameswaran, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, Mechanisms for Primordial Black Hole Production in String Theory , JCAP 07 (2018) 005, [ arXiv:1803.07626]

  33. [41]

    Gao and Z.-K

    T.-J. Gao and Z.-K. Guo, Primordial Black Hole Production in Inflationary Models of Supergravity with a Single Chiral Superfield , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 6 063526, [arXiv:1806.09320]

  34. [42]

    V. Atal, J. Garriga, and A. Marcos-Caballero, Primordial black hole formation with non-Gaussian curvature perturbations, JCAP 09 (2019) 073, [ arXiv:1905.13202]

  35. [43]

    V. Atal, J. Cid, A. Escriv` a, and J. Garriga, PBH in single field inflation: the effect of shape dispersion and non-Gaussianities , JCAP 05 (2020) 022, [ arXiv:1908.11357]

  36. [44]

    S. S. Mishra and V. Sahni, Primordial Black Holes from a tiny bump/dip in the Inflaton potential, JCAP 04 (2020) 007, [ arXiv:1911.00057]

  37. [45]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Rey, and F. Rompineve, Detuning primordial black hole dark matter with early matter domination and axion monodromy , JCAP 06 (2020) 014, [ arXiv:1912.01638]

  38. [46]

    Dalianis, A

    I. Dalianis, A. Kehagias, and G. Tringas, Primordial black holes from α-attractors, JCAP 01 (2019) 037, [ arXiv:1805.09483]

  39. [47]

    Bhaumik and R

    N. Bhaumik and R. K. Jain, Primordial black holes dark matter from inflection point models of inflation and the effects of reheating , JCAP 01 (2020) 037, [ arXiv:1907.04125]

  40. [48]

    Drees and Y

    M. Drees and Y. Xu, Overshooting, Critical Higgs Inflation and Second Order Gravitational Wave Signatures, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021), no. 2 182, [ arXiv:1905.13581]

  41. [49]

    Dalianis and G

    I. Dalianis and G. Tringas, Primordial black hole remnants as dark matter produced in thermal, matter, and runaway-quintessence postinflationary scenarios , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 8 083512, [ arXiv:1905.01741]

  42. [50]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Rey, M. Taoso, and A. Urbano, Primordial black holes as dark matter and gravitational waves from single-field polynomial inflation , JCAP 07 (2020) 025, [arXiv:2001.08220]

  43. [51]

    H. V. Ragavendra, P. Saha, L. Sriramkumar, and J. Silk, Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from ultraslow roll and punctuated inflation , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 8 083510, [ arXiv:2008.12202]. – 37 –

  44. [52]

    D. V. Nanopoulos, V. C. Spanos, and I. D. Stamou, Primordial Black Holes from No-Scale Supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 8 083536, [ arXiv:2008.01457]

  45. [53]

    Iacconi, H

    L. Iacconi, H. Assadullahi, M. Fasiello, and D. Wands, Revisiting small-scale fluctuations in α-attractor models of inflation , JCAP 06 (2022), no. 06 007, [ arXiv:2112.05092]

  46. [54]

    I. D. Stamou, Mechanisms of producing primordial black holes by breaking the SU (2, 1)/SU (2) × U (1) symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 8 083512, [arXiv:2104.08654]

  47. [55]

    L. Wu, Y. Gong, and T. Li, Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from string inspired general no-scale supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 12 123544, [arXiv:2105.07694]

  48. [56]

    Ng and Y.-P

    K.-W. Ng and Y.-P. Wu, Constant-rate inflation: primordial black holes from conformal weight transitions, JHEP 11 (2021) 076, [ arXiv:2102.05620]

  49. [57]

    Rezazadeh, Z

    K. Rezazadeh, Z. Teimoori, and K. Karami, Non-Gaussianity and Secondary Gravitational Waves from Primordial Black Holes Production in α-attractor Inflation, arXiv:2110.01482

  50. [58]

    Wang, Y.-C

    Q. Wang, Y.-C. Liu, B.-Y. Su, and N. Li, Primordial black holes from the perturbations in the inflaton potential in peak theory , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 8 083546, [ arXiv:2111.10028]

  51. [59]

    Gu, F.-W

    B.-M. Gu, F.-W. Shu, K. Yang, and Y.-P. Zhang, Primordial black holes from an inflationary potential valley , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 2 023519, [ arXiv:2207.09968]

  52. [60]

    Frolovsky, S

    D. Frolovsky, S. V. Ketov, and S. Saburov, E-models of inflation and primordial black holes , Front. in Phys. 10 (2022) 1005333, [ arXiv:2207.11878]

  53. [61]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. G. Pedro, and N. Pedron, Secondary GWs and PBHs in string inflation: formation and detectability , arXiv:2203.00021

  54. [62]

    Ghoshal, A

    A. Ghoshal, A. Moursy, and Q. Shafi, Cosmological probes of grand unification: Primordial black holes and scalar-induced gravitational waves , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 5 055039, [arXiv:2306.04002]

  55. [63]

    Pi and J

    S. Pi and J. Wang, Primordial black hole formation in Starobinsky’s linear potential model , JCAP 06 (2023) 018, [ arXiv:2209.14183]

  56. [64]

    Allegrini, L

    S. Allegrini, L. Del Grosso, A. J. Iovino, and A. Urbano, Is the formation of primordial black holes from single-field inflation compatible with standard cosmology? , arXiv:2412.14049

  57. [65]

    Cai, X.-H

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-H. Ma, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang, and Z. Zhou, One Small Step for an Inflaton, One Giant Leap for Inflation: a novel non-Gaussian tail and primordial black holes , arXiv:2112.13836

  58. [66]

    Inomata, E

    K. Inomata, E. McDonough, and W. Hu, Amplification of primordial perturbations from the rise or fall of the inflaton , JCAP 02 (2022), no. 02 031, [ arXiv:2110.14641]

  59. [67]

    Inomata, E

    K. Inomata, E. McDonough, and W. Hu, Primordial black holes arise when the inflaton falls , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 12 123553, [ arXiv:2104.03972]

  60. [68]

    Kefala, G

    K. Kefala, G. P. Kodaxis, I. D. Stamou, and N. Tetradis, Features of the inflaton potential and the power spectrum of cosmological perturbations , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 2 023506, [arXiv:2010.12483]

  61. [69]

    Dalianis, G

    I. Dalianis, G. P. Kodaxis, I. D. Stamou, N. Tetradis, and A. Tsigkas-Kouvelis, Spectrum oscillations from features in the potential of single-field inflation , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 10 103510, [ arXiv:2106.02467]

  62. [70]

    Yokoyama, Chaotic new inflation and formation of primordial black holes , Phys

    J. Yokoyama, Chaotic new inflation and formation of primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 083510, [ astro-ph/9802357]

  63. [71]

    Saito, J

    R. Saito, J. Yokoyama, and R. Nagata, Single-field inflation, anomalous enhancement of superhorizon fluctuations, and non-Gaussianity in primordial black hole formation , JCAP 06 (2008) 024, [ arXiv:0804.3470]. – 38 –

  64. [72]

    Bugaev and P

    E. Bugaev and P. Klimai, Large curvature perturbations near horizon crossing in single-field inflation models, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 063515, [ arXiv:0806.4541]

  65. [73]

    C. Fu, P. Wu, and H. Yu, Primordial black holes and oscillating gravitational waves in slow-roll and slow-climb inflation with an intermediate noninflationary phase , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 4 043527, [ arXiv:2006.03768]

  66. [74]

    Briaud and V

    V. Briaud and V. Vennin, Uphill inflation , JCAP 06 (2023) 029, [ arXiv:2301.09336]

  67. [75]

    Karam, N

    A. Karam, N. Koivunen, E. Tomberg, A. Racioppi, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Primordial black holes and inflation from double-well potentials , JCAP 09 (2023) 002, [ arXiv:2305.09630]

  68. [76]

    Cai, Z.-K

    R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, J. Liu, L. Liu, and X.-Y. Yang, Primordial black holes and gravitational waves from parametric amplification of curvature perturbations , JCAP 06 (2020) 013, [arXiv:1912.10437]

  69. [77]

    Tasinato, An analytic approach to non-slow-roll inflation , Phys

    G. Tasinato, An analytic approach to non-slow-roll inflation , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 2 023535, [arXiv:2012.02518]

  70. [78]

    Z. Zhou, J. Jiang, Y.-F. Cai, M. Sasaki, and S. Pi, Primordial black holes and gravitational waves from resonant amplification during inflation , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 10 103527, [arXiv:2010.03537]

  71. [79]

    Z.-Z. Peng, C. Fu, J. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, and R.-G. Cai, Gravitational waves from resonant amplification of curvature perturbations during inflation , JCAP 10 (2021) 050, [arXiv:2106.11816]

  72. [80]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Braglia, X. Chen, and S. Renaux-Petel, Questions on calculation of primordial power spectrum with large spikes: the resonance model case , JCAP 04 (2023) 011, [arXiv:2211.02586]. [Erratum: JCAP 09, E01 (2023)]

  73. [81]

    Fumagalli, S

    J. Fumagalli, S. Bhattacharya, M. Peloso, S. Renaux-Petel, and L. T. Witkowski, One-loop infrared rescattering by enhanced scalar fluctuations during inflation , JCAP 04 (2024) 029, [arXiv:2307.08358]

  74. [82]

    Caravano, K

    A. Caravano, K. Inomata, and S. Renaux-Petel, Inflationary Butterfly Effect: Nonperturbative Dynamics from Small-Scale Features, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024), no. 15 151001, [arXiv:2403.12811]

  75. [83]

    ¨Ozsoy and G

    O. ¨Ozsoy and G. Tasinato, Inflation and Primordial Black Holes , Universe 9 (2023), no. 5 203, [arXiv:2301.03600]

  76. [84]

    Wands, Duality invariance of cosmological perturbation spectra, Phys

    D. Wands, Duality invariance of cosmological perturbation spectra, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 023507, [gr-qc/9809062]

  77. [85]

    C. T. Byrnes, P. S. Cole, and S. P. Patil, Steepest growth of the power spectrum and primordial black holes , JCAP 06 (2019) 028, [ arXiv:1811.11158]

  78. [86]

    Carrilho, K

    P. Carrilho, K. A. Malik, and D. J. Mulryne, Dissecting the growth of the power spectrum for primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 10 103529, [ arXiv:1907.05237]

  79. [87]

    Liu, Z.-K

    J. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, and R.-G. Cai, Analytical approximation of the scalar spectrum in the ultraslow-roll inflationary models , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 8 083535, [arXiv:2003.02075]

  80. [88]

    ¨Ozsoy and G

    O. ¨Ozsoy and G. Tasinato, On the slope of the curvature power spectrum in non-attractor inflation, JCAP 04 (2020) 048, [ arXiv:1912.01061]

  81. [89]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Rey, M. Taoso, and A. Urbano, Stochastic inflationary dynamics beyond slow-roll and consequences for primordial black hole formation , JCAP 08 (2020) 043, [arXiv:2006.14597]

  82. [90]

    ¨Ozsoy and G

    O. ¨Ozsoy and G. Tasinato, Consistency conditions and primordial black holes in single field inflation, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 2 023524, [ arXiv:2111.02432]. – 39 –

  83. [91]

    Inomata and X

    K. Inomata and X. Luo, Constraints on the Sharpness of the Curvature Power Spectrum , arXiv:2410.07086

  84. [92]

    Cielo, G

    M. Cielo, G. Mangano, O. Pisanti, and D. Wands, Steepest Growth in the Primordial Power Spectrum from Excited States at a Sudden Transition , arXiv:2410.22154

  85. [93]

    P. S. Cole, A. D. Gow, C. T. Byrnes, and S. P. Patil, Steepest growth re-examined: repercussions for primordial black hole formation , arXiv:2204.07573

  86. [94]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Multicomponent de Sitter (Inflationary) Stages and the Generation of Perturbations, JETP Lett. 42 (1985) 152–155

  87. [95]

    Sasaki and E

    M. Sasaki and E. D. Stewart, A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation, Prog. Theor. Phys. 95 (1996) 71–78, [astro-ph/9507001]

  88. [96]

    Sasaki and T

    M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka, Superhorizon scale dynamics of multiscalar inflation , Prog. Theor. Phys. 99 (1998) 763–782, [ gr-qc/9801017]

  89. [97]

    D. H. Lyth, K. A. Malik, and M. Sasaki, A General proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation, JCAP 05 (2005) 004, [ astro-ph/0411220]

  90. [98]

    J. H. P. Jackson, H. Assadullahi, A. D. Gow, K. Koyama, V. Vennin, and D. Wands, The separate-universe approach and sudden transitions during inflation , JCAP 05 (2024) 053, [arXiv:2311.03281]

  91. [99]

    Artigas, S

    D. Artigas, S. Pi, and T. Tanaka, Extended δN formalism, arXiv:2408.09964

  92. [100]

    J. H. P. Jackson, H. Assadullahi, A. D. Gow, K. Koyama, V. Vennin, and D. Wands, Stochastic inflation beyond slow roll: noise modelling and importance sampling , arXiv:2410.13683

  93. [101]

    Grain and V

    J. Grain and V. Vennin, Canonical transformations and squeezing formalism in cosmology , JCAP 02 (2020) 022, [ arXiv:1910.01916]

  94. [102]

    Bloch and A

    C. Bloch and A. Messiah, The Canonical form of an antisymmetric tensor and its application to the theory of superconductivity , Nucl. Phys. 39 (1962) 95–106

  95. [103]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

    “ NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions .” https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.2 of 2024-09-15. F. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain, eds

  96. [104]

    Martin, H

    J. Martin, H. Motohashi, and T. Suyama, Ultra Slow-Roll Inflation and the non-Gaussianity Consistency Relation, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013), no. 2 023514, [ arXiv:1211.0083]

  97. [105]

    Motohashi, A

    H. Motohashi, A. A. Starobinsky, and J. Yokoyama, Inflation with a constant rate of roll , JCAP 09 (2015) 018, [ arXiv:1411.5021]

  98. [106]

    Motohashi, S

    H. Motohashi, S. Mukohyama, and M. Oliosi, Constant Roll and Primordial Black Holes , JCAP 03 (2020) 002, [ arXiv:1910.13235]

  99. [107]

    R. Inui, H. Motohashi, S. Pi, Y. Tada, and S. Yokoyama, Constant roll and non-Gaussian tail in light of logarithmic duality , arXiv:2409.13500

  100. [108]

    S. M. Leach, M. Sasaki, D. Wands, and A. R. Liddle, Enhancement of superhorizon scale inflationary curvature perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 023512, [ astro-ph/0101406]

  101. [109]

    Akrami et al., Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami et al., Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10, [ arXiv:1807.06211]

  102. [110]

    BICEP , KeckCollaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al., Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021), no. 15 151301, [ arXiv:2110.00483]

  103. [111]

    Wang, X.-H

    X. Wang, X.-H. Ma, and M. Sasaki, A complete analysis of inflation with piecewise quadratic potential, arXiv:2412.16463. – 40 –

  104. [112]

    Vennin, Horizon-Flow off-track for Inflation , Phys

    V. Vennin, Horizon-Flow off-track for Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), no. 8 083526, [arXiv:1401.2926]

  105. [113]

    Chowdhury, J

    D. Chowdhury, J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, Assessing the scientific status of inflation after Planck , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 8 083537, [ arXiv:1902.03951]

  106. [114]

    Balaji, H

    S. Balaji, H. V. Ragavendra, S. K. Sethi, J. Silk, and L. Sriramkumar, Observing Nulling of Primordial Correlations via the 21-cm Signal , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022), no. 26 261301, [arXiv:2206.06386]

  107. [115]

    Caravano, G

    A. Caravano, G. Franciolini, and S. Renaux-Petel, Ultra-Slow-Roll Inflation on the Lattice: Backreaction and Nonlinear Effects , arXiv:2410.23942

  108. [116]

    Senatore and M

    L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, On Loops in Inflation , JHEP 12 (2010) 008, [arXiv:0912.2734]

  109. [117]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior., M. Taoso, and A. Urbano, Perturbativity in the presence of ultraslow-roll dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 12 123550, [ arXiv:2305.03491]

  110. [118]

    Cheng, D.-S

    S.-L. Cheng, D.-S. Lee, and K.-W. Ng, Primordial perturbations from ultra-slow-roll single-field inflation with quantum loop effects , JCAP 03 (2024) 008, [ arXiv:2305.16810]

  111. [119]

    Vennin and A

    V. Vennin and A. A. Starobinsky, Correlation Functions in Stochastic Inflation , Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 413, [ arXiv:1506.04732]

  112. [120]

    Ando and V

    K. Ando and V. Vennin, Power spectrum in stochastic inflation , JCAP 04 (2021) 057, [arXiv:2012.02031]. – 41 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.