pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.16541 · v1 · submitted 2025-01-27 · 🪐 quant-ph

Experimental demonstration of a scalable room-temperature quantum battery

Kieran Hymas , Jack B. Muir , Daniel Tibben , Joel van Embden , Tadahiko Hirai , Christopher J. Dunn , Daniel E. G\'omez , James A. Hutchison
show 2 more authors
Trevor A. Smith James Q. Quach
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 04:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum batteryroom-temperatureorganic microcavitysuperextensive chargingmetastable energyquantum coherenceenergy storageelectrical power
0
0 comments X

The pith

A room-temperature multi-layered organic microcavity device functions as a quantum battery with superextensive charging and power output.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to establish that a practical device can harness quantum effects for energy storage at room temperature without complex cooling or controls. It reports a multi-layered organic structure in a microcavity that charges in a superextensive manner, holds energy stably through metastabilisation, and produces superextensive electrical power during discharge. These behaviors together complete the full cycle of charging, storage, and release in one device for the first time. A sympathetic reader would see the result as moving quantum batteries from abstract models toward scalable prototypes where performance improves with size.

Core claim

The multi-layered organic-microcavity design exhibits superextensive charging, metastabilisation of stored energy, and generates superextensive electrical power, representing the first experimental demonstration of the complete operational cycle of a quantum battery at room temperature.

What carries the argument

The multi-layered organic-microcavity structure that supports quantum coherent interactions for energy storage and release.

If this is right

  • Charging rate and stored energy increase faster than linearly with added layers.
  • Metastabilisation keeps the stored energy available for later use without rapid loss.
  • Discharge produces electrical power that also increases superextensively.
  • The design integrates the full battery cycle into a single room-temperature device.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar cavity designs could be tested in other organic systems to see whether superextensive behavior appears in light-to-electricity conversion.
  • Varying layer thickness or material choice would provide a direct test of how coherence length controls the observed scaling.
  • The unpredicted power enhancement suggests the cavity may also improve extraction efficiency beyond the charging step alone.

Load-bearing premise

The observed superextensive charging and power output arise from quantum coherent effects in the microcavity rather than classical collective phenomena or experimental artifacts.

What would settle it

Measuring charging dynamics or power output versus number of layers and finding only linear or sublinear scaling with size would show the effects are not quantum-enhanced as claimed.

read the original abstract

Harnessing quantum phenomena in energy storage systems offers an opportunity to introduce a new generation of batteries with quantum-enhanced performance. Until now, the quantum battery has largely remained a theoretical concept, with little progress towards experimental realisation, due to the challenges in quantum coherent control. Here, we experimentally demonstrate a scalable room-temperature quantum battery with a multi-layered organic-microcavity design. We show that it exhibits superextensive charging, metastabilisation of stored energy, and generates superextensive electrical power, the latter an unpredicted phenomenon. The combination of these properties in a single device is the first demonstration of the full cycle of a quantum battery, laying the framework for future designs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims an experimental demonstration of a scalable room-temperature quantum battery realized in a multi-layered organic-microcavity architecture. It reports three key observations—superextensive charging, metastabilisation of stored energy, and superextensive electrical power output (the last described as unpredicted)—and asserts that their combination constitutes the first experimental realization of the full operational cycle of a quantum battery.

Significance. If the reported phenomena are confirmed to originate from quantum coherent dynamics rather than classical collective effects, the result would constitute a notable advance by providing the first experimental platform that simultaneously exhibits the charging, storage, and discharge phases of a quantum battery at room temperature. The unpredicted superextensive power generation would be of particular interest to the field.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that superextensive charging, metastabilisation, and superextensive power arise from quantum coherent effects (rather than classical cavity-mediated collective phenomena such as polariton condensation or modified radiative rates) is load-bearing for the 'quantum battery' designation and the 'first full cycle' assertion, yet the manuscript provides no described controls (detuning dependence, coherence spectroscopy, or explicit comparison to rate-equation models) that would rule out the classical alternatives.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract contains no quantitative values, error bars, or coherence-time measurements, making it impossible to assess the magnitude or statistical significance of the reported effects from the provided text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and for highlighting the importance of distinguishing quantum coherent effects from classical collective phenomena. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen this distinction.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that superextensive charging, metastabilisation, and superextensive power arise from quantum coherent effects (rather than classical cavity-mediated collective phenomena such as polariton condensation or modified radiative rates) is load-bearing for the 'quantum battery' designation and the 'first full cycle' assertion, yet the manuscript provides no described controls (detuning dependence, coherence spectroscopy, or explicit comparison to rate-equation models) that would rule out the classical alternatives.

    Authors: We agree that explicit controls are needed to support the quantum interpretation over classical alternatives. The observed superextensive charging and power output are presented as inconsistent with purely classical rate-equation models in the supplementary material, and the multi-layered microcavity architecture is designed to exploit strong-coupling polariton physics. However, the manuscript does not include the specific controls mentioned (detuning sweeps, coherence measurements, or direct model comparisons in the main text). We will revise by adding a new subsection that performs explicit comparisons to classical rate-equation simulations, incorporates available detuning-dependent data, and discusses why polariton condensation or modified radiative rates alone cannot account for the full set of observations. The abstract will be updated to reflect this strengthened discussion while retaining the core claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration without derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports experimental measurements of charging dynamics, energy storage, and power output in an organic microcavity device. No mathematical derivation, first-principles prediction, or fitted parameter is presented that reduces by construction to its own inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes. Claims rest on direct observations rather than a closed logical loop, satisfying the self-contained criterion with no load-bearing reductions identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are extractable from the abstract; the central claim rests on the experimental interpretation that the measured behaviors are quantum in origin.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5676 in / 1066 out tokens · 17456 ms · 2026-05-23T04:37:50.430909+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dual-use quantum hardware for quantum resource generation and energy storage

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Quantum resource generation and quantum battery charging can be achieved with the same protocols, enabling integrated dual-use hardware on superconducting circuits.

  2. Dual-use quantum hardware for quantum resource generation and energy storage

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Protocols for generating quantum resources can simultaneously charge quantum batteries with a collective advantage, enabling dual-use superconducting hardware for sensing or energy storage.

  3. Collisional charging of a transmon quantum battery

    quant-ph 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A transmon quantum battery charged by coherent ancillas achieves improved control of stored energy and extraction in experimentally accessible parameter regimes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    International Energy Agency, Report, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Q., Cerullo, G

    Quach, J. Q., Cerullo, G. & Virgili, T., Quantum batteries: The future of energy storage? Joule 7, 2195 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Q., Polini, M

    Campaioli, F., Gherardini, S., Quach, J. Q., Polini, M. & Andolina, G. M., Colloquium: Quantum Batteries. Reviews of Modern Physics 96, 031001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    & Fannes, M., Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries

    Alicki, R. & Fannes, M., Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries. Physical Review E 87, 042123 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    V., Perarnau-Llobet, M., Huber, M

    Hovhannisyan, K. V., Perarnau-Llobet, M., Huber, M. & Acin, A., Entanglement Generation is Not Necessary for Optimal Work Extraction. Physical Review Letters 111, 240401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    C., Vinjanampathy, S., Modi, K

    Binder, F. C., Vinjanampathy, S., Modi, K. & Goold, J., Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries. New Journal of Physics 17, 075015 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    et al., Enhancing the charging power of quantum batteries

    Campaioli, F. et al., Enhancing the charging power of quantum batteries. Physical Review Letters 118, 150601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    & Kazuki, I., Exceeding the maximum classical energy density in fully charged quantum batteries

    Hotta, M. & Kazuki, I., Exceeding the maximum classical energy density in fully charged quantum batteries. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01832 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    & Pati, A

    Mohan, B. & Pati, A. K., Reverse quantum speed limit: How slowly a quantum battery can discharge. Physical Review A 104, 042209 (2021). Page 22 of 26

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    P., Levinsen, J., Modi, K., Parish, M

    Le, T. P., Levinsen, J., Modi, K., Parish, M. M. & Pollock, F. A., Spin-chain model of a many-body quantum battery. Physical Review A 97, 022106 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Andolina, G. M. et al., Extractable work, the role of correlations, and asymptotic freedom in quantum batteries. Physical Review Letters 122, 047702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    & Wang, X., Powerful harmonic charging in a quantum battery

    Zhang, Y.-Y., Yang, T.-R., Fu, L. & Wang, X., Powerful harmonic charging in a quantum battery. Physical Review E 99, 052106 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Physical Review Letters 122, 210601 (2019)

    Barra, F., Dissipative charging of a quantum battery. Physical Review Letters 122, 210601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    & Hanna, G., Loss-free excitonic quantum battery

    Liu, J., Segal, D. & Hanna, G., Loss-free excitonic quantum battery. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 123, 18303 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    C., Çakmak, B., Campbell, S

    Santos, A. C., Çakmak, B., Campbell, S. & Zinner, N. T., Stable adiabatic quantum batteries. Physical Review E 100, 032107 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Rossini, D., Andolina, G. M. & Polini, M., Many-body localized quantum batteries. Physical Review B 100, 115142 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    & Auffèves, A., The energetic cost of work extraction

    Monsel, J., Fellous-Asiani, M., Huard, B. & Auffèves, A., The energetic cost of work extraction. Physical Review Letters 124, 130601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Julià-Farré, S., Salamon, T., Riera, A., Bera, M. N. & Lewenstein, M., Bounds on the capacity and power of quantum batteries. Physical Review Research 2, 023113 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    & Ferraro, D., Charging and energy fluctuations of a driven quantum battery

    Crescente, A., Carrega, M., Sassetti, M. & Ferraro, D., Charging and energy fluctuations of a driven quantum battery. New Journal of Physics 22, 063057 (2020). Page 23 of 26

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Quach, J. Q. & Munro, W. J., Using dark states to charge and stabilize open quantum batteries. Physical Review Applied 14, 024092 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    M., Rosa, D., Carrega, M

    Rossini, D., Andolina, G. M., Rosa, D., Carrega, M. & Polini, M., Quantum advantage in the charging process of Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev batteries. Physical Review Letters 125, 236402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    & Ferraro, D., Ultrafast charging in a two- photon Dicke quantum battery

    Crescente, A., Carrega, M., Sassetti, M. & Ferraro, D., Ultrafast charging in a two- photon Dicke quantum battery. Physical Review B 102, 245407 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    & Nimmrichter, S., Quantum speed-up in collisional battery charging

    Seah, S., Perarnau-Llobet, M., Haack, G., Brunner, N. & Nimmrichter, S., Quantum speed-up in collisional battery charging. Physical Review Letters 127, 100601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    & Sen, A., Fast charging of a quantum battery assisted by noise

    Ghosh, S., Chanda, T., Mal, S. & Sen, A., Fast charging of a quantum battery assisted by noise. Physical Review A 104, 032207 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    & Yang, W.-L., Entanglement and work extraction in the central-spin quantum battery

    Liu, J.-X., Shi, H.-L., Shi, Y.-H., Wang, X.-H. & Yang, W.-L., Entanglement and work extraction in the central-spin quantum battery. Physical Review B 104, 245418 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    PRX Quantum 3, 020101 (2022)

    Auffèves, A., Quantum technologies need a quantum energy initiative. PRX Quantum 3, 020101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    R., Hermann-Avigliano, C

    Carrasco, J., Maze, J. R., Hermann-Avigliano, C. & Barra, F., Collective enhancement in dissipative quantum batteries. Physical Review E 105, 064119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    G., Giampaolo, S

    Catalano, A. G., Giampaolo, S. M., Morsch, O., Giovannetti, V. & Franchini, F., Frustrating quantum batteries. PRX Quantum 5, 030319 (2024). Page 24 of 26

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    et al., Realization of superabsorption by time reversal of superradiance

    Yang, D. et al., Realization of superabsorption by time reversal of superradiance. Nature Photonics 15, 272 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Quach, J. Q. et al., Superabsorption in an organic microcavity: Toward a quantum battery. Science Advances 8, eabk3160 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    et al., Optimal charging of a superconducting quantum battery

    Hu, C.-K. et al., Optimal charging of a superconducting quantum battery. Quantum Science and Technology 7, 045018 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    & Sassetti, M., IBM quantum platforms: A quantum battery perspective

    Gemme, G., Grossi, M., Ferraro, D., Vallecorsa, S. & Sassetti, M., IBM quantum platforms: A quantum battery perspective. Batteries 8, 43 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    M., Pellegrini, V

    Ferraro, D., Campisi, M., Andolina, G. M., Pellegrini, V. & Polini, M., High-power collective charging of a solid-state quantum battery. Physical Review Letters 120, 117702 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Fabry, C., Theorie et applications d'une nouvelle methods de spectroscopie intereferentielle. Ann. Chim. Ser. 7 16, 115 (1899)

    work page

  35. [35]

    Uchida, S., Xue, J., Rand, B. P. & Forrest, S. R., Organic small molecule solar cells with a homogeneously mixed copper phthalocyanine: C60 active layer. Applied Physics Letters 84, 4218 (2004)

    work page 2004

  36. [36]

    & Robey, S., Ultrafast charge-transfer processes at an oriented phthalocyanine/C60 interface

    Dutton, G., Jin, W., Reutt-Robey, J. & Robey, S., Ultrafast charge-transfer processes at an oriented phthalocyanine/C60 interface. Physical Review B 82, 073407 (2010)

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    & Kaxiras, E., Theoretical investigation of the C60/copper phthalocyanine organic photovoltaic heterojunction

    Ren, J., Meng, S. & Kaxiras, E., Theoretical investigation of the C60/copper phthalocyanine organic photovoltaic heterojunction. Nano Research 5, 248 (2012). Page 25 of 26

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    & K, Organic photodiodes with an extended responsivity using ultrastrong light-matter coupling

    Eizner, E., Brodeur, J., Barachati, F., Sridharan, A. & K, Organic photodiodes with an extended responsivity using ultrastrong light-matter coupling. ACS Photonics 5, 2921 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    & Robey, S., Exciton dynamics at CuPc/C60 interfaces: energy dependence of exciton dissociation

    Dutton, G. & Robey, S., Exciton dynamics at CuPc/C60 interfaces: energy dependence of exciton dissociation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 116, 19173 (2012)

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    et al., Influence of the transition metals central atom nature on the optical and electrophysical properties of phthalocyanine nanowires

    Tazhibayev, S. et al., Influence of the transition metals central atom nature on the optical and electrophysical properties of phthalocyanine nanowires. Materials Chemistry and Physics 301, 127696 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    & Polli, D., Time-resolved methods in biophysics

    Cerullo, G., Manzoni, C., Lüer, L. & Polli, D., Time-resolved methods in biophysics. 4. Broadband pump–probe spectroscopy system with sub-20 fs temporal resolution for the study of energy transfer processes in photosynthesis. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 6, 135-144 (2007)

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    Muir, J. B. et al., Interactions between Fermi polarons in monolayer WS2. Nature Communications 13, 6164 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Ma, Q., Krishna Kumar, R., Xu, S.-Y., Koppens, F. H. & Song, J. C., Photocurrent as a multiphysics diagnostic of quantum materials. Nature Reviews Physics 5, 170 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    et al., Direct observation of charge separation in an organic light harvesting system by femtosecond time-resolved XPS

    Roth, F. et al., Direct observation of charge separation in an organic light harvesting system by femtosecond time-resolved XPS. Nature Communications 12, 1196 (2021). Page 26 of 26

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    J., Tsokkou, D., Banerji, N

    Krainova, N., Grede, A. J., Tsokkou, D., Banerji, N. & Giebink, N. C., Polaron photoconductivity in the weak and strong light-matter coupling regime. Physical Review Letters 124, 177401 (2020). Acknowledgements J.A.H. and T.A.S. acknowledge financial support through various Australian Research Council (ARC) schemes; LE200100051, CE170100026, FT180100295 a...

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Eizner, J

    E. Eizner, J. Brodeur, F. Barachati, A. Sridharan, and S. K´ ena-Cohen, Organic photodiodes with an extended responsivity using ultrastrong light–matter coupling, ACS Photonics 5, 2921 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    J. Q. Quach, K. E. McGhee, L. Ganzer, D. M. Rouse, B. W. Lovett, E. M. Gauger, J. Keeling, G. Cerullo, D. G. Lidzey, and T. Virgili, Superabsorption in an organic microcavity: Toward a quantum battery, Science advances 8, eabk3160 (2022). 27

    work page 2022