pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.17927 · v3 · submitted 2025-01-29 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· math-ph· math.AT· math.MP· quant-ph

Engineering of Anyons on M5-Probes via Flux Quantization

Hisham Sati , Urs Schreiber This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 05:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.ATmath.MPquant-ph
keywords anyonsM5-branesflux quantizationChern-Simons theorytopological orderCohomotopybraid groupsquantum observables
0
0 comments X

The pith

Flux quantization of the M5-brane tensor field in twisted equivariant Cohomotopy produces the observables and modular functor of abelian Chern-Simons theory together with braid actions on defect anyons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives anyonic topological order on single magnetized M5-branes that probe Seifert orbi-singularities by completing the brane's tensor field with a global flux quantization condition. This completion is required to respect the field's non-linear self-duality and its twisting by the bulk C-field, and it exists only inside a non-abelian generalized cohomology theory known as twisted equivariant unstable Cohomotopy. Once the condition is imposed, the topological quantum observables are identified with Pontrjagin homology algebras of mapping spaces from the orbi-fixed worldvolume into a classifying 2-sphere. Standard results in algebraic topology then recover the expected quantum observables, modular functor, and braid-group actions on anyons that appear in fractional quantum Hall systems and in proposals for topological quantum gates.

Core claim

The central claim is that the global completion of the M5-brane tensor field by flux quantization in twisted equivariant unstable Cohomotopy implies that topological quantum observables form Pontrjagin homology algebras of mapping spaces from the orbi-fixed worldvolume into a classifying 2-sphere; algebraic topology then yields from this data the quantum observables and modular functor of abelian Chern-Simons theory as well as braid group actions on defect anyons of the kind needed for topologically protected quantum computation.

What carries the argument

Flux quantization of the M5-brane tensor field inside twisted equivariant unstable Cohomotopy, which supplies the global completion that is compatible with non-linear self-duality and C-field twisting and thereby determines the Pontrjagin homology algebras of the relevant mapping spaces.

If this is right

  • Topological quantum observables arise directly as Pontrjagin homology algebras of mapping spaces from the orbi-fixed M5-worldvolume into a classifying 2-sphere.
  • These algebras recover the quantum observables and modular functor of abelian Chern-Simons theory without invoking a Lagrangian or perturbative expansion.
  • Braid group actions on defect anyons follow automatically and match those envisioned for hardware implementing topologically protected quantum gates.
  • Anyonic topological order is thereby realized geometrically on single magnetized M5-branes probing Seifert orbi-singularities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same flux-quantization mechanism may furnish a uniform non-Lagrangian description for other classes of anyonic defects once the appropriate mapping spaces are identified.
  • Consistency checks against known fractional quantum Hall filling fractions could be performed by specializing the orbi-singularity data and extracting the resulting braid representations.
  • If the construction extends to non-abelian target spaces, it would supply candidate modular functors beyond the abelian case currently recovered.
  • The approach indicates that global topological constraints on M-theory backgrounds can directly constrain the hardware requirements for topological quantum computation.

Load-bearing premise

The global completion of the M5-brane tensor field by flux quantization in twisted equivariant unstable Cohomotopy is the correct non-abelian generalized cohomology theory that respects the non-linear self-duality and the twisting by the bulk C-field.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the Pontrjagin homology algebras for a concrete Seifert orbi-singularity that fails to reproduce the modular S-matrix or the braid representations of abelian Chern-Simons theory at the expected level.

read the original abstract

These extended lecture notes survey a novel derivation of anyonic topological order (as seen in fractional quantum Hall systems) on single magnetized M5-branes probing Seifert orbi-singularities ("geometric engineering" of anyons), which we motivate from fundamental open problems in the field of quantum computing. The rigorous construction is non-Lagrangian and non-perturbative, based on previously neglected global completion of the M5-brane's tensor field by flux-quantization consistent with its non-linear self-duality and its twisting by the bulk C-field. This exists only in little-studied non-abelian generalized cohomology theories, notably in a twisted equivariant (and "twistorial") form of unstable Cohomotopy ("Hypothesis H"). As a result, topological quantum observables form Pontrjagin homology algebras of mapping spaces from the orbi-fixed worldvolume into a classifying 2-sphere. Remarkably, results from algebraic topology imply from this the quantum observables and modular functor of abelian Chern-Simons theory, as well as braid group actions on defect anyons of the kind envisioned as hardware for topologically protected quantum gates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims a novel non-Lagrangian, non-perturbative derivation of anyonic topological order on magnetized M5-branes probing Seifert orbi-singularities via flux quantization in twisted equivariant unstable Cohomotopy (Hypothesis H). Topological quantum observables are identified as Pontrjagin homology algebras of mapping spaces from the orbi-fixed worldvolume to a classifying 2-sphere, from which algebraic topology implies the quantum observables, modular functor of abelian Chern-Simons theory, and braid group actions on defect anyons.

Significance. If Hypothesis H holds, this provides a significant non-perturbative construction of anyons from M-theory with direct relevance to topological quantum computing. A clear strength is the explicit use of algebraic topology results on Pontrjagin homology to recover the abelian Chern-Simons observables and braid actions once the flux quantization is granted. The approach is credited for respecting non-linear self-duality and C-field twisting through generalized cohomology.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the assertion of a 'rigorous construction' is load-bearing on Hypothesis H, yet the text supplies no explicit steps, error estimates, or independent checks for the flux quantization in this little-studied cohomology theory.
  2. Hypothesis H section: the choice of twisted equivariant unstable Cohomotopy for flux quantization requires a concrete test or comparison to alternative generalized cohomology theories to address correctness-risk concerns, as this choice underpins the derivation of the anyonic observables and modular functor.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their detailed and constructive feedback on our manuscript. Their comments help us improve the clarity regarding the foundational assumptions of our work. We respond to each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the assertion of a 'rigorous construction' is load-bearing on Hypothesis H, yet the text supplies no explicit steps, error estimates, or independent checks for the flux quantization in this little-studied cohomology theory.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's phrasing could be misleading without qualification. The construction is rigorous conditional upon Hypothesis H, which is stated as such in the main text. The manuscript surveys the framework rather than providing a self-contained derivation of the flux quantization, which is developed in our prior publications. We will revise the abstract to read 'a construction conditional on Hypothesis H' and add a sentence clarifying the reliance on this hypothesis. Explicit steps for the quantization are referenced in the Hypothesis H section, and error estimates are not applicable as this is an exact topological result; independent checks are provided by the reproduction of known abelian Chern-Simons theory and braid actions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Hypothesis H section: the choice of twisted equivariant unstable Cohomotopy for flux quantization requires a concrete test or comparison to alternative generalized cohomology theories to address correctness-risk concerns, as this choice underpins the derivation of the anyonic observables and modular functor.

    Authors: The selection of twisted equivariant unstable Cohomotopy is justified in the section by its unique capacity to encode the non-linear self-duality and C-field twisting of the M5-brane, properties not captured by standard cohomology theories. To address the concern, we will include a new paragraph comparing it to alternatives such as twisted K-theory and ordinary cohomology, explaining why they do not yield the Pontrjagin homology observables matching Chern-Simons theory. While a direct 'test' in the empirical sense is not feasible in this purely theoretical context, the internal consistency with algebraic topology theorems on mapping spaces provides validation. We believe this addition mitigates the correctness-risk concerns. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is conditional on explicit hypothesis with independent algebraic topology steps

full rationale

The paper's chain starts from the explicit assumption of Hypothesis H (flux quantization in twisted equivariant unstable Cohomotopy) as the global completion rule for the M5-brane tensor field. From this input it defines topological observables as Pontrjagin homology algebras of mapping spaces into a classifying 2-sphere, then invokes standard algebraic topology results to recover the known abelian Chern-Simons observables, modular functor, and braid actions. These topology implications are externally established and independent of the paper's setup; they do not reduce the output to the input by construction, nor does the paper derive or smuggle Hypothesis H from its own results. The construction is therefore self-contained once the stated hypothesis is granted, with no load-bearing self-citation that collapses the central claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the acceptance of Hypothesis H as the correct flux-quantization law; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract, but the entire construction is conditional on this background assumption.

axioms (1)
  • ad hoc to paper Hypothesis H: twisted equivariant unstable Cohomotopy provides the correct global completion of the M5-brane tensor field consistent with non-linear self-duality and C-field twisting.
    The abstract states that the rigorous construction exists only in this theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5743 in / 1541 out tokens · 89298 ms · 2026-05-23T05:04:08.398762+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-Perturbative SDiff Covariance of Fractional Quantum Hall Excitations

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The effective Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory for FQH excitations admits a non-perturbative unitary SDiff-equivariant construction that is nevertheless non-differentiable.

  2. Super Landau Model and Howe Duality: From Supermonopole Harmonics to Quantum Matrix Geometry

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Howe duality underlies the super Landau model, relating Landau levels via supermonopole harmonics and yielding matrix coordinates for fuzzy superspheres at arbitrary levels with a determined non-commutative scale.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

158 extracted references · 158 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Aharony, O., Gubser, S., Maldacena, J., Ooguri, H., Oz, Y., Large N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity, Phys. Rept. 323 (2000), 183-386, [ doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00083-6], [arXiv:hep-th/9905111]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00083-6 2000

  2. [2]

    High Energ

    An, Y.-S., Li L., Yang, F.-G., Yang, R.-Q., Interior Structure and Complexity Growth Rate of Holographic Superconductor from M-Theory, J. High Energ. Phys. 2022 133 (2022), [ doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)133], [arXiv:2205.02442]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022)133 2022

  3. [3]

    Fractional Statistics and the Quantum Hall Effect,

    Arovas, D. P., Schrieffer, R., Wilczek, F., Fractional Statistics and the Quantum Hall Effect , Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 722, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.722]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.722 1984

  4. [4]

    P., Schrieffer, R., Wilczek, F., Zee, A., Statistical mechanics of anyons, Nucl

    Arovas, D. P., Schrieffer, R., Wilczek, F., Zee, A., Statistical mechanics of anyons, Nucl. Phys. B 251 (1985), 117-126, [doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90252-4]

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90252-4 1985

  5. [5]

    Bae, J.-B., Lee, S., Emergent Supersymmetry on the Edges, SciPost Phys.11 091 (2021), [arXiv:2105.02148], [doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.5.091]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.11.5.091 2021

  6. [6]

    Bakulev, A. P., Shirkov, D., Inevitability and Importance of Non-Perturbative Elements in Quantum Field Theory, Proceedings of the 6th Mathematical Physics Meeting, Belgrade (2010), 27–54, [ arXiv:1102.2380], [ISBN:978-86-82441-30-4]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    P., Srivastava, A

    Balachandran, A. P., Srivastava, A. M., Chern-Simons Dynamics and the Quantum Hall Effect , [arXiv:hep-th/9111006]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    2013 , month = jan, publisher =

    Barkeshli, M., Jian, C.-M., X.-L. Qi, Twist defects and projective non-Abelian braiding statistics , Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013) 045130 [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.045130], [arXiv:1208.4834]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.045130 2013

  9. [9]

    Beardsley, J., Nakamura, S., Projective Geometries and Simple Pointed Matroids as F1-modules, [arXiv:2404.04730]

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    I., Progress and Prospects in the Field of Quantum Computing , Optoelectron

    Beterov, I. I., Progress and Prospects in the Field of Quantum Computing , Optoelectron. Instrument. Proc. 60 (2024), 74–83, [ doi:10.3103/S8756699024700043]

    work page doi:10.3103/s8756699024700043 2024

  11. [11]

    G., Neumann, P

    Bhattacharjee, M., Macpherson, D., M¨ oller, R. G., Neumann, P. M., Notes on Infinite Permutation Groups , Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1698, Springer (2006), 67-76, [ doi:10.1007/BFb0092558]

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0092558 2006

  12. [12]

    Bott, R., Tu, L., Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 82, Springer (1982), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3951-0]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3951-0 1982

  13. [13]

    L., Espahbodi S., Geometrically Engineerable Chiral Matter in M-Theory , [arXiv:0804.1132]

    Bourjaily, J. L., Espahbodi S., Geometrically Engineerable Chiral Matter in M-Theory , [arXiv:0804.1132]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Geometry and Physics 161 (2021) 104034 [ doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2020.104034], [arXiv:1909.12277]

    Burton, S., Sati, H., Schreiber, U., Lift of fractional D-brane charge to equivariant Cohomotopy theory , J. Geometry and Physics 161 (2021) 104034 [ doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2020.104034], [arXiv:1909.12277]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2020.104034 2021

  15. [15]

    Chakraborty, T., Pietil¨ ainen, P.,The Quantum Hall Effects – Integral and Fractional , Springer Series in Solid State Sciences (1995), [ doi:10.1007/978-3-642-79319-6]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-79319-6 1995

  16. [16]

    O., Teo, J

    Chan, P. O., Teo, J. C. Y., Ryu, S., Topological Phases on Non-orientable Surfaces: Twisting by Parity Symmetry, New J. Phys. 18 (2016) 035005, [ arXiv:1509.03920], [doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/3/035005]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/3/035005 2016

  17. [17]

    et al., Quantum Computing Devices – Principles, Designs, and Analysis , Routledge (2007), [ISBN:9780367390372]

    Chen, G. et al., Quantum Computing Devices – Principles, Designs, and Analysis , Routledge (2007), [ISBN:9780367390372]

    work page 2007

  18. [18]

    Y., Gang, D., Kim, H.-C., M-theoretic Genesis of Topological Phases , J

    Cho, G. Y., Gang, D., Kim, H.-C., M-theoretic Genesis of Topological Phases , J. High Energ. Phys. 2020 115 (2020) [ doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2020)115], [arXiv:2007.01532]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2020)115 2020

  19. [19]

    Chu, C., Lorscheid, O., Santhanam, R., Sheaves and K-theory for F1-schemes, Adv. Math. 229 4 (2012), 2239-2286, [arXiv:1010.2896], [doi:10.1016/j.aim.2011.12.023]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.aim.2011.12.023 2012

  20. [20]

    Clay Math Institute, The Millennium Prize Problems , [www.claymath.org/millennium-problems]

    work page

  21. [21]

    Cohen, F. R., Introduction to configuration spaces and their applications , in: Braids, Lecture Notes Series, Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore 19 (2009), 183-261, [doi:10.1142/9789814291415 0003]. 40

    work page doi:10.1142/9789814291415 2009

  22. [22]

    DARPA, Quantum Benchmarjing Initiative (2024), [www.darpa.mil/work-with-us/quantum-benchmarking-initiative]

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Das Sarma, S., Quantum computing has a hype problem , MIT Tech Review (March 2022), [www.technologyreview.com/2022/03/28/1048355/quantum-computing-has-a-hype-problem/]

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Das Sarma, S., In search of Majorana , Nature Physics 19 (2023), 165-170, [ arXiv:2210.17365], [doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01900-9]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01900-9 2023

  25. [25]

    D’Auria, R., Fr´ e, P.,Geometric Supergravity in D = 11 and its hidden supergroup, Nucl. Phys. B 201 (1982), 101-140, [doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90376-5]

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90376-5 1982

  26. [26]

    P., Sonner, J., Withers, B., Competing orders in M-theory: superfluids, stripes and metamagnetism, J

    Donos, A., Gauntlett, J. P., Sonner, J., Withers, B., Competing orders in M-theory: superfluids, stripes and metamagnetism, J. High Energ. Phys. 2013 108 (2013), [ doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2013)108], [arXiv:1212.0871]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2013)108 2013

  27. [27]

    P., Pantelidou, C., Semi-local quantum criticality in string/M-theory, J

    Donos, A., Gauntlett, J. P., Pantelidou, C., Semi-local quantum criticality in string/M-theory, J. High Energ. Phys. 2013 103 (2013), [ doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2013)103], [arXiv:1212.1462]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2013)103 2013

  28. [28]

    Duff, M., The World in Eleven Dimensions: Supergravity, Supermembranes and M-theory , IoP (1999), [ISBN:9780750306720]

    work page 1999

  29. [29]

    Dul, F., General Covariance from the Viewpoint of Stacks , Lett Math Phys 113 (2023) 30, [arXiv:2112.15473], [doi:10.1007/s11005-023-01653-3]

    work page doi:10.1007/s11005-023-01653-3 2023

  30. [30]

    I., Prospects for quantum computing: extremely doubtful , Int

    Dyakonov, M. I., Prospects for quantum computing: extremely doubtful , Int. J. of Modern Physics: Conf. Series 33 (2014) 1460357, [ arXiv:1401.3629], [doi:10.1142/S2010194514603573]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s2010194514603573 2014

  31. [31]

    Ezratty O., Where are we heading with NISQ? , [arXiv:2305.09518]

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Ezratty O., Where are we heading with NISQ? , blog post (2023), [www.oezratty.net/wordpress/2023/where-are-we-heading-with-nisq]

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Farb, B., Margalit, D., A primer on mapping class groups , Princeton University Press (2012), [doi:j.ctt7rkjw], [ISBN:9780691147949]

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    S., Semenoff, G

    Ferraz, A., Gupta, K. S., Semenoff, G. W., Sodano, P. (eds), Strongly Coupled Field Theories for Condensed Matter and Quantum Information Theory , Springer Proceedings in Physics 239, Springer (2020), [doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35473-2]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35473-2 2020

  35. [35]

    , Schreiber, U., A higher stacky perspective on Chern-Simons theory , in Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Field Theories Springer (2014), 153-211, [ doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09949-1]

    Fiorenza, D., Sati, H. , Schreiber, U., A higher stacky perspective on Chern-Simons theory , in Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Field Theories Springer (2014), 153-211, [ doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09949-1]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09949-1 2014

  36. [36]

    Fiorenza, D., Sati, H., Schreiber, U., The WZW term of the M5-brane and differential cohomotopy , J. Math. Phys. 56 (2015) 102301, [ doi:10.1063/1.4932618], [arXiv:1506.07557]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.4932618 2015

  37. [37]

    Fiorenza, D., Sati, H., Schreiber, U., T-Duality from super Lie n-algebra cocycles for super p-branes, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys 22 5 (2018), [ arXiv:1611.06536], [doi:10.4310/ATMP.2018.v22.n5.a3]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.2018.v22.n5.a3 2018

  38. [38]

    Fiorenza, D., Sati, H., Schreiber, U., Twisted Cohomotopy implies M5 WZ term level quantization , Commun. Math. Phys. 384 (2021), 403-432, [ doi:10.1007/s00220-021-03951-0], [arXiv:1906.07417]

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-021-03951-0 2021

  39. [39]

    Fiorenza, D., Sati, H., Schreiber, U., Twisted Cohomotopy implies M-theory anomaly cancellation on 8- manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys. 377 (2020), 1961-2025, [ doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03707-2], [arXiv:1904.10207]

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03707-2 2020

  40. [40]

    Twisted cohomotopy implies twisted String structure on M5-branes J

    Fiorenza, D., Sati, H., Schreiber, U. Twisted cohomotopy implies twisted String structure on M5-branes J. Math. Phys. 62 (2021) 042301, [ arXiv:2002.11093], [doi:10.1063/5.0037786]

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0037786 2021

  41. [41]

    , Schreiber, U., Twistorial Cohomotopy Implies Green-Schwarz anomaly cancellation , Rev

    Fiorenza, D., Sati, H. , Schreiber, U., Twistorial Cohomotopy Implies Green-Schwarz anomaly cancellation , Rev. Math. Phys. 34 05 (2022) 2250013, [ doi:10.1142/S0129055X22500131], [arXiv:2008.08544]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x22500131 2022

  42. [42]

    Fiorenza, D., Sati, H., Schreiber, U., The Character map in Nonabelian Cohomology — Twisted, Differential and Generalized, World Scientific, Singapore (2023), [ doi:10.1142/13422], [arXiv:2009.11909]

    work page doi:10.1142/13422 2023

  43. [43]

    C., Yao, N

    Foss-Feig, M., Pagano, G., Potter, A. C., Yao, N. Y., Progress in Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulation , Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. (2024), [ doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-032822-045619], [arXiv:2409.02990]

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-032822-045619 2024

  44. [44]

    G., Hollenberg, L

    Fowler, A. G., Hollenberg, L. C. L., Scalability of Shor’s algorithm with a limited set of rotation gates , Phys. Rev. A 70 (2007) 032329 [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.032417]

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.103.032417 2007

  45. [45]

    B., Nayak, C., Qi, X.-L., Walker, K., Wang, Z., Projective Ribbon Permutation Statistics: a Remnant of non-Abelian Braiding in Higher Dimensions , Phys

    Freedman, M., Hastings, M. B., Nayak, C., Qi, X.-L., Walker, K., Wang, Z., Projective Ribbon Permutation Statistics: a Remnant of non-Abelian Braiding in Higher Dimensions , Phys. Rev. B 83 115132 (2011), [arXiv:10.1103/PhysRevB.83.115132], [arXiv:1005.0583]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.115132 2011

  46. [46]

    Freedman, M., Kitaev, A., Larsen, M., Wang, Z., Topological quantum computation, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 40 (2003), 31-38, [ arXiv:quant-ph/0101025], [doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-02-00964-3]. 41

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-02-00964-3 2003

  47. [47]

    Gallier, J., Xu, D., A Guide to the Classification Theorem for Compact Surfaces , Springer (2013), [doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34364-3]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34364-3 2013

  48. [48]

    P., Sonner, J., Wiseman, T., Holographic superconductivity in M-Theory, Phys

    Gauntlett, J. P., Sonner, J., Wiseman, T., Holographic superconductivity in M-Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 151601, [ arXiv:0907.3796], [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.151601]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.151601 2009

  49. [50]

    2023), [spectrum.ieee.org/quantum-computing-skeptics]

    Gent, E, Quantum Computing’s Hard, Cold Reality Check , IEEE Spectrum (Dec. 2023), [spectrum.ieee.org/quantum-computing-skeptics]

    work page 2023

  50. [51]

    G., et al., Quantum Computing: Vision and Challenges , [arXiv:2403.02240]

    Gill, S. G., et al., Quantum Computing: Vision and Challenges , [arXiv:2403.02240]

    work page arXiv

  51. [52]

    High Energy Phys

    Giotopoulos G., Sati, H., Schreiber, U, Flux Quantization on 11d Superspace , J. High Energy Phys. 2024 (2024) 82, [ doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)082], [arXiv:2403.16456]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2024)082 2024

  52. [53]

    High Energy Phys

    Giotopoulos, G., Sati, H., Schreiber, U., Flux Quantization on M5-Branes J. High Energy Phys. 2024 140 (2024), [doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)140], [arXiv:2406.11304]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2024)140 2024

  53. [54]

    Giotopoulos, G., Sati, H., Schreiber, U., Super L∞ T-Duality and M-theory , [arXiv:2411.10260]

    work page arXiv

  54. [55]

    Grady, D., Sati, H., Differential cohomotopy versus differential cohomology for M-theory and differential lifts of Postnikov towers , J. Geom. Phys. 165 (2021) 104203, [ doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104203], [arXiv:2001.07640]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104203 2021

  55. [56]

    Griffiths, P., Morgan, J., Rational Homotopy Theory and Differential Forms , Progress in Mathematics 16, Birkh¨ auser (1981, 2013), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8468-4]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8468-4 1981

  56. [57]

    Collective Excitations at Filling Factor <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:math> : The View from Superspace

    Gromov, A., Martinec, E. J., Ryu, S., Collective excitations at filling factor 5/2: The view from superspace , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 077601, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.077601], [arXiv:1909.06384]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.077601 2020

  57. [58]

    (eds.), Quantum Computing: Progress and Prospects , The National Academies Press (2019), [ doi:10.17226/25196], [ISBN:9780309479691]

    Grumblin, E., Horowitz, M. (eds.), Quantum Computing: Progress and Prospects , The National Academies Press (2019), [ doi:10.17226/25196], [ISBN:9780309479691]

    work page doi:10.17226/25196 2019

  58. [59]

    S., Pufu, S

    Gubser, S. S., Pufu, S. S., Rocha, F. D., Quantum critical superconductors in string theory and M-theory , Phys. Lett. B 683 (2010), 201-204, [ arXiv:0908.0011], [doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.12.017]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.12.017 2010

  59. [60]

    C., T-duality and the bulk-boundary correspondence , J

    Hannabuss, K. C., T-duality and the bulk-boundary correspondence , J. Geom. Phys. 124 (2018), 421-435, [doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2017.11.016], [arXiv:1704.00278]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2017.11.016 2018

  60. [61]

    L., On the Space of Maps of a Closed Surface into the 2-Sphere , Math

    Hansen, V. L., On the Space of Maps of a Closed Surface into the 2-Sphere , Math. Scand. 35 (1974), 149-158, [doi:10.7146/math.scand.a-11542], [jstor:24490694]

    work page doi:10.7146/math.scand.a-11542 1974

  61. [62]

    B., Taylor, J

    Hartle, J. B., Taylor, J. R., Quantum Mechanics of Paraparticles , Phys. Rev. 178 (1969) 2043 [doi:10.1103/PhysRev.178.2043]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.178.2043 1969

  62. [63]

    Hartnoll, S., Lucas, A., Sachdev, S., Holographic quantum matter , MIT Press (2018), [ arXiv:1612.07324], [ISBN:9780262348010]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [64]

    Hasebe, K., Unification of Laughlin and Moore–Read states in SUSY quantum Hall effect , Phys. Lett. A 372 9 (2008), 1516-1520, [ doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2007.09.071]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2007.09.071 2008

  64. [65]

    Hatcher, A., Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press (2002), [ ISBN:9780521795401]

    work page 2002

  65. [66]

    P., Kovtun, P., Sachdev, S., Thanh, D

    Herzog, C. P., Kovtun, P., Sachdev, S., Thanh, D. S., Quantum critical transport, duality, and M-theory , Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 085020, [ arXiv:hep-th/0701036], [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.085020]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.085020 2007

  66. [67]

    Disentangling hype from practicality: On realistically achieving quantum advantage,

    Hoefler, T., Haener, T., Troyer, M., Disentangling Hype from Practicality: On Realistically Achieving Quan- tum Advantage, Commun. ACM 66 5 (2023), 82-87, [ doi:10.1145/3571725], [arXiv:2307.00523]

    work page doi:10.1145/3571725 2023

  67. [68]

    Huerta, J., Sati, H., Schreiber, U., Real ADE-equivariant (co)homotopy and Super M-branes, Communications in Mathematical Physics 371 (2019) 425 [ doi:10.1007/s00220-019-03442-3], [arXiv:1805.05987]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00220-019-03442-3 2019

  68. [69]

    Nature626(7999), 505–511 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06934-4

    Iqbal, M., Tantivasadakarn, N., Verresen, R. et al., Non-Abelian topological order and anyons on a trapped-ion processor, Nature 626 (2024), 505–511, [ doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06934-4]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06934-4 2024

  69. [70]

    E., Topological approach to electron correlations at fractional quantum Hall effect , Ann

    Jacak, J. E., Topological approach to electron correlations at fractional quantum Hall effect , Ann. Phys. 430 (2021) 168493, [ doi:10.1016/j.aop.2021.168493]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2021.168493 2021

  70. [71]

    Springer, New York, USA (1984)

    James, I. M., General Topology and Homotopy Theory, Springer (1984), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8283-6]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8283-6 1984

  71. [72]

    Jiang, B., Bouhon, A., Lin, Z.-K., Zhou, X., Hou, B., Li, F., Slager, R.-J., Jiang, J.-H., Experimental observation of non-Abelian topological acoustic semimetals and their phase transitions , Nature Physics 17 (2021), 1239-1246, [ doi;10.1038/s41567-021-01340-x], [arXiv:2104.13397]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01340-x 2021

  72. [73]

    P., Quantum Computation Beyond the Circuit Model , PhD thesis, MIT (2010) [arXiv:0809.2307]

    Jordan, S. P., Quantum Computation Beyond the Circuit Model , PhD thesis, MIT (2010) [arXiv:0809.2307]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  73. [74]

    P., Permutational Quantum Computing , Quantum Information and Computation 10 (2010) 470 [arXiv:0906.2508], [doi:10.26421/QIC10.5-6-7]

    Jordan, S. P., Permutational Quantum Computing , Quantum Information and Computation 10 (2010) 470 [arXiv:0906.2508], [doi:10.26421/QIC10.5-6-7]. 42

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.26421/qic10.5-6-7 2010

  74. [75]

    Kak, S., Prospects for Quantum Computing , talk at CIFAR Nanotechnology program meeting, Halifax (November 2008), [arXiv:0902.4884]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  75. [76]

    Kallel, S., Configuration Spaces and the Topology of Curves in Projective Space , in: Topology, Geometry, and Algebra: Interactions and new directions , Contemporary Mathematics 279, AMS (2001), 151–175, [doi:10.1090/conm/279]

    work page doi:10.1090/conm/279 2001

  76. [77]

    4 (2025), [doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-95703-8.00211-1], [arXiv:2407.11092]

    Kallel, S., Configuration spaces of points: A user’s guide , Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics 2nd ed. 4 (2025), [doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-95703-8.00211-1], [arXiv:2407.11092]

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95703-8.00211-1 2025

  77. [78]

    Katz, S., Klemm, A., Vafa, C., Geometric Engineering of Quantum Field Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 497 (1997), 173-195, [doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00282-4], [arXiv:hep-th/9609239]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00282-4 1997

  78. [79]

    Kitaev, A., Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires , Physics-Uspekhi 44 10S (2001), 131-136, [arXiv:cond-mat/0010440], [doi:10.1070/1063-7869/44/10S/S29]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1070/1063-7869/44/10s/s29 2001

  79. [80]

    Kitaev, A., Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons , Ann. Phys. 303 (2003), 2-30, [doi:10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0], [arXiv:quant-ph/9707021]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(02)00018-0 2003

  80. [81]

    Kitaev, A., Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond , Ann. Phys. 321 1 (2006), 2-111, [doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005]

    work page Pith review doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005 2006

Showing first 80 references.