Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Stop treating `AGI' as the north-star goal of AI research

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.03689 v4 pith:BGQZBHI7 submitted 2025-02-06 cs.CY

Stop treating `AGI' as the north-star goal of AI research

Borhane Blili-Hamelin , Christopher Graziul , Leif Hancox-Li , Hananel Hazan , El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi , Avijit Ghosh , Katherine Heller , Jacob Metcalf
show 8 more authors
Fabricio Murai Eryk Salvaggio Andrew Smart Todd Snider Mariame Tighanimine Talia Ringer Margaret Mitchell Shiri Dori-Hacohen
This is my paper
classification cs.CY
keywords researchgoalgoalscommunityargueengineeringmultipleneeds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The AI research community plays a vital role in shaping the scientific, engineering, and societal goals of AI research. In this position paper, we argue that focusing on the highly contested topic of `artificial general intelligence' (`AGI') undermines our ability to choose effective goals. We identify six key traps -- obstacles to productive goal setting -- that are aggravated by AGI discourse: Illusion of Consensus, Supercharging Bad Science, Presuming Value-Neutrality, Goal Lottery, Generality Debt, and Normalized Exclusion. To avoid these traps, we argue that the AI research community needs to (1) prioritize specificity in engineering and societal goals, (2) center pluralism about multiple worthwhile approaches to multiple valuable goals, and (3) foster innovation through greater inclusion of disciplines and communities. Therefore, the AI research community needs to stop treating `AGI' as the north-star goal of AI research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Instructions Shape Production of Language, not Processing

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Instructions trigger a production-centered mechanism in language models, with task-specific information stable in input tokens but varying strongly in output tokens and correlating with behavior.

  2. Instructions Shape Production of Language, not Processing

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Instructions primarily shape the production stage of language models rather than the processing stage, with task-specific information and causal effects stronger in output tokens than input tokens.