Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 6 cited by

High-Rate Four Photon Subtraction from Squeezed Vacuum: Preparing Cat State for Optical Quantum Computation

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports high-rate photon subtraction of up to four photons from squeezed vacuum, producing Schrödinger cat states whose Wigner functions are negative without loss correction and whose density matrices show coherent off-diagonal…

desk verdict A genuine first: four-photon subtraction from squeezed vacuum with a two-order-of-magnitude rate improvement, but the paper must show the TES n=4 click fidelity before the core claim is fully secure. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08952 v1 pith:R6IEFH2V submitted 2025-02-13 quant-ph physics.optics

Mamoru Endo , Takefumi Nomura , Tatsuki Sonoyama , Kazuma Takahashi , Sachiko Takasu , Daiji Fukuda , Takahiro Kashiwazaki , Asuka Inoue
show 7 more authors
Takeshi Umeki Rajveer Nehra Petr Marek Radim Filip Kan Takase Warit Asavanant Akira Furusawa
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords photonsubtractionSchrödingercatstatesqueezedvacuumtransition-edgesensorcontinuous-variablequantuminformationWignerfunctionnegativityGottesman-Kitaev-Preskillcodefour-photon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the subtraction of up to four photons from a pulsed squeezed vacuum, producing approximate Schrödinger cat states with larger amplitudes than anything previously demonstrated by this method. Earlier experiments had stalled at three subtracted photons for more than a decade because event rates fell to impractical levels. Using a broadband waveguide optical parametric amplifier and a titanium-gold transition-edge sensor that resolves photon numbers at 5 MHz repetition, the authors achieve 200 counts per second for three-photon subtraction and 1.5 counts per second for four-photon subtraction. The reconstructed states show Wigner function negativity without any loss correction, and their momentum-basis density matrices show off-diagonal coherence that distinguishes a genuine superposition from a classical mixture. This matters because larger-amplitude cat states are the resource needed for proposed optical GKP qubit generation and fault-tolerant continuous-variable quantum computing.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is heralded photon subtraction: a high-reflectivity beam splitter taps the squeezed vacuum, and a number-resolving transition-edge sensor detects n photons in the reflected idler mode, collapsing the transmitted signal mode into an approximate even or odd cat state $\hat{a}^n \hat{S}(r)|0\rangle$. The parity of the cat matches n because the squeezed vacuum contains only even photon numbers. What makes n=4 reachable is the combination of a broadband picosecond-wavepacket optical parametric amplifier, which supplies enough squeezed light at 5 MHz repetition, and the TES detector, which distinguishes one through four photons cleanly enough to herald at 1.5 counts per second; homodyne tomography then reconstructs the density matrix and Wigner function.

What would settle it

Block the idler beam or switch off the amplifier while keeping the detector live: if four-photon trigger events do not drop to nearly zero, or if the reconstructed Wigner function still shows negativity under those dark conditions, the claimed four-photon subtraction is contaminated by detector noise.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that four-photon subtraction from squeezed vacuum is now experimentally practical and produces a genuinely nonclassical approximate cat state. The experiment taps a squeezed vacuum with a beam splitter, detects n photons in the idler arm with a transition-edge sensor, and thereby drives the signal arm into a state proportional to $\hat{a}^n \hat{S}(r)|0\rangle$, whose amplitude grows with $\sqrt{n}$. For n=4 the reconstructed Wigner function retains negative values without loss correction, and the real part of the momentum-basis density matrix shows off-diagonal peaks at the two cat amplitudes with the sign expected from the state's even parity. The authors present these as evidence that the state is a coherent superposition of two wavepackets rather than a mixture, matching simulations that use independently determined experimental parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the detector's four-photon events are genuine, not electrical noise or pulse pileup, since the paper itself shows electrical noise can be misread as photon events but does not quantify how much noise reaches the four-photon channel.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Four-photon-subtracted squeezed vacuum shows Wigner function negativity without loss correction, so the nonclassicality survives four successive annihilation operations.
  • The off-diagonal elements of the reconstructed density matrix in the momentum basis confirm that the state is a coherent superposition of two wavepackets, not a classical mixture.
  • With three-photon subtraction at about 200 counts per second and four-photon at 1.5 counts per second, higher-order subtraction becomes practical enough for further use in continuous-variable quantum information.
  • Because the cat amplitude grows with the square root of the number of subtracted photons, four-photon subtraction yields a larger-amplitude cat state than previous n=3 experiments, moving closer to resources needed for GKP-style qubits.
  • The same setup is claimed to extend to generalized photon subtraction and photon addition, pointing toward a programmable non-Gaussian state synthesizer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test, not in the paper, is to quantify the dark-count and pulse-pileup contamination of the n=4 heralding channel by comparing trigger rates with the amplifier off; this would directly bound how much of the observed Wigner negativity is genuine.
  • If the four-photon rate can be raised further by higher-repetition-rate sources or multiplexing, repeat-until-success GKP preparation becomes feasible; the paper demonstrates the enabling detector and source but not the full GKP synthesizer.
  • The same TES-based number-resolved detection could be used to certify non-Gaussian states from photon addition or generalized subtraction, where the n-photon herald also controls the state parity and amplitude.
  • The off-diagonal density-matrix test is a stronger witness than Wigner negativity alone because it distinguishes cat states from mixed coherent states; future work could use it to certify large-amplitude cats even when losses wipe out Wigner negativity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experiment that performs photon subtraction from pulsed squeezed vacuum at a telecom wavelength, heralding up to four photons with a Ti-Au transition-edge sensor. The authors reconstruct density matrices and Wigner functions from homodyne tomography without loss correction and claim, for the first time, four-photon subtraction at a usable rate of 1.5 counts per second, producing approximate cat states with Wigner negativity and off-diagonal coherence. The simulation parameters are stated to be set by independent experimental conditions rather than fitted to the tomography data, and the paper reports agreement between experiment and simulation for mean photon numbers and density-matrix features.

Significance. If the four-photon-subtraction claim is secure, this would be a notable advance over the decade-old n=3 limit for photon-subtracted cat states, with direct relevance to resource-state generation for GKP qubits. The paper's strengths are explicit and credible: the simulation parameters are not fitted to the tomography data; error bars are computed by bootstrap; the reconstructed states show qualitative and quantitative agreement with simulation; and the Wigner negativity and density-matrix coherence are presented without loss correction. The main risk is the fidelity of the TES click classification, which is load-bearing for the n=4 claim and is not quantified in the manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.4 and §5.2] Section 3.4 states that electrical noise in the TES signal was incorrectly detected as single-photon events, but the manuscript provides no analogous analysis of the n=4 channel. Because the four-photon event rate is only 1.5 cps, a small absolute false-positive rate would constitute a large relative contamination of the heralded ensemble, and a misclassified event (e.g., a true n=3 event with added noise) would inject an odd-parity component that directly biases the Wigner-function origin value and the off-diagonal density-matrix elements shown in Figs. 5 and 6. The paper should report a confusion matrix or dark-count bound for the n=4 classification under operating conditions, or an offline waveform reanalysis of the claimed n=4 events, to support the assertion that the observed negativity and coherence are intrinsic to the four-photon-subtracted state.
  2. [§5.2 and SI §I.A.1] The TES timing resolution is reported as about 50 ns while pulses arrive every 200 ns at 5 MHz with a 107 ns decay time constant; this combination invites pulse pileup and baseline-recovery errors, but the paper does not quantify their effect on pulse-height classification. The stated energy resolution E/ΔE = 4.54 characterizes single-photon distinguishability and is not a substitute for a measured separation of the n=3 and n=4 pulse-height distributions at the operating count rates. The authors should provide a pileup analysis or the measured pulse-height histograms for the n=4 trigger condition.
  3. [§3.5 and Fig. 6] For the four-photon-subtracted state, the claim of Wigner negativity without loss correction rests on the reconstructed Wigner function shown in Fig. 6(f), but the paper does not provide a statistical significance statement for the negative values at the phase-space origin or in the surrounding region. In light of the detector-classification concerns above, the authors should state the confidence intervals for the negativity (e.g., via a bootstrap test or a nonclassicality witness) and, if possible, the fidelity of the reconstructed state to the simulated four-photon-subtracted squeezed vacuum.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§5.2] The text contains a typographical error: 'SMF28 fiber (Cornig)' should read 'Corning'.
  2. [§2.2 and §3.2] The simulation parameters are quoted inconsistently: Fig. 2 uses r = 0.567/0.576 and R = 0.78, while Sec. 3.2 states an input squeezing level of 6.5 dB and R = 0.81; please harmonize these values and clarify which set was used for the quantitative comparisons.
  3. [§3.2] The phrase 'the loss of the waveguide OPA was 0.05' is ambiguous; please specify whether this is internal loss, escape efficiency, or total insertion loss.
  4. [§2.3 and §5.2] The idler-side total efficiency is given as approximately 40%, while the TES system detection efficiency is stated as 89.2%; a brief breakdown of the remaining losses (coupling, optical filters, fiber splice, etc.) would help the reader assess the count-rate numbers.
  5. [References] The paper relies heavily on the authors' previous work [26] for experimental details; a sentence in the main text explicitly listing the technical elements that are new in this work would clarify the incremental contribution.
  6. [Fig. 3] The heatmaps in Figs. 3(b) and 3(c) lack axis labels and color scales; adding time/voltage axes and a color bar would make the raw TES and homodyne signals more interpretable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central result is an experimental realization whose simulations are parameterized from measured conditions, not fitted to the reconstructed data.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental demonstration: after conditioning on TES-detected n-photon clicks, the heralded signal state is reconstructed from homodyne data via maximum likelihood without loss correction, and the resulting Wigner functions and density-matrix off-diagonals are compared with theory. No predicted quantity is obtained by fitting the model to the tomographic output. Section 3.2 explicitly states: "The parameters required for the simulations were determined based on actual experimental conditions (i.e., they were not obtained by fitting to experimental data)." The simulation parameters (losses, beam-splitter reflectivity, input squeezing) all come from independent experimental calibrations, so the agreement shown in Figs. 4-6 is a benchmark against an independently constructed model, not a forced coincidence. The only self-citations ([26], [32]) provide apparatus details and supplementary datasets; they are not load-bearing for the nonclassicality claim. The concern about TES classification fidelity for n=4 events is an experimental validity issue, not a circularity: even if misclassification occurred, it would not make the claim true by definition or by self-reference. The derivation and analysis chain is therefore self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several experimentally calibrated inputs and standard theoretical results. The paper is transparent that simulation parameters were not fitted to the tomography data, but the values are not all independently verified in this manuscript.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The conditional state after detecting n photons in the idler arm of a beam splitter is approximated by a^n S(r)|0> (annihilation operator acting on squeezed vacuum).
    This is the standard photon subtraction model from Dakna et al. (1997), cited as [20]. The paper uses it to interpret all measured states as approximate cat states.
  • domain assumption The pulsed squeezed vacuum is treated as a single-mode state; all multi-mode effects are folded into effective loss parameters (signal-side loss 0.15, idler-side loss 0.6).
    Section 3.2 uses these loss parameters in Strawberryfields simulations; the validity of this single-mode reduction is not discussed in detail.
  • domain assumption The TES photon number resolution is reliable for n up to 4, with no significant dark counts or electrical noise misclassification for n>=2.
    Section 3.4 admits electrical noise caused spurious single-photon events; the paper does not analyze whether similar noise could produce spurious four-photon events at 1.5 cps.
  • domain assumption The input squeezing level is 6.5 dB (no-loss value), used in all simulations.
    Section 3.2 states this value; the calibration measurement is not shown in this manuscript, and the agreement between data and simulation is sensitive to it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-Rate Four Photon Subtraction from Squeezed Vacuum: Preparing Cat State for Optical Quantum Computation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R6IEFH2V

@misc{pith2026250208952,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-Rate Four Photon Subtraction from Squeezed Vacuum: Preparing Cat State for Optical Quantum Computation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R6IEFH2V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08952}
}
abstract

Generating logical qubits, essential for error detection and correction in quantum computation, remains a critical challenge in continuous-variable (CV) optical quantum information processing. The Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) code is a leading candidate for logical qubits, and its generation requires large-amplitude coherent state superpositions -- Schr\"{o}dinger cat states. However, experimentally producing these resource states has been hindered in the optical domain by technical challenges. The photon subtraction method, a standard approach for generating cat states using a squeezed vacuum and a photon number-resolving detector, has proven difficult to scale to multi-photon operations. While the amplitude of the generated cat states increases with the number of subtracted photons, limitations in the generation rate have restricted the maximum photon subtraction to $n=3$ for over a decade. In this work, we demonstrate high-rate photon subtraction of up to four photons from a squeezed vacuum with picosecond wavepackets generated by a broadband optical parametric amplifier. Using a Ti-Au superconducting-transition-edge sensor, we achieve high-speed, high-resolution photon number discrimination. The resulting states exhibit Wigner function negativity without loss correction, and their quantum coherence is verified through off-diagonal density matrix elements in CV representation. These results overcome long-standing limitations in multi-photon operations, providing a critical foundation for generating quantum resources essential for fault-tolerant quantum computing and advancing ultrafast optical quantum processors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fundamental limits of parameter estimation with heralded optical non-Gaussian states generated from Gaussian resources

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For single-parameter phase estimation, the success-probability-weighted quantum Fisher information of any non-Gaussian state heralded from Gaussian resources through passive linear optics is no larger than the quantum...

  2. Non-Gaussianity in cat codes: global incompatibility and local geometric alignment with the magic resource

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cat codes break the global GKP magic-non-Gaussianity equivalence, but a sector-adapted SU(d) asymptotic cat code locally aligns Wigner-logarithmic-negativity contours with magic-measure contours.

  3. Efficient characterization of general Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill qubits

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new set of positive semidefinite operators for GKP qubits gives logical infidelity via three quadrature measurements and yields finite-dimensional approximations as ground states.

  4. Simplified scheme for continuous-variable entanglement distillation: multicopy distillation of Gaussian entanglement without heralding Gaussian measurements

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Gaussian vacuum-projection steps in a standard CV entanglement distillation protocol can be absorbed into the preparation of the input Gaussian states, leaving an equivalent protocol that uses only single-photon d...

  5. Measurement-induced generation of Schr\"{o}dinger cat states in cavity QED

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Repeated cycles of coherent driving, dispersive atom-cavity interaction, and atomic postselection generate two- and multi-component Schrödinger cat states, but the written multi-component formula in Eq. (7) is inconsi...

  6. Synthetic Data-Driven Multi-Architecture Framework for Automated Polyp Segmentation Through Integrated Detection and Mask Generation

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A proposed pipeline combining synthetic polyp image generation, Faster R-CNN detection, and SAM segmentation, with benchmark scores for five segmentation models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Physical Review Letters 82(8), 1784–1787 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.82.1784

    Lloyd, S., Braunstein, S.L.: Quantum computation over continuous variables. Physical Review Letters 82(8), 1784–1787 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.82.1784

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    APL Photonics 4(6), 060902 (2019) https://doi.org/10

    Takeda, S., Furusawa, A.: Toward large-scale fault-tolerant universal photonic quantum computing. APL Photonics 4(6), 060902 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.5100160

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Science 366(6463), 373–376 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1126/science

    Asavanant, W., Shiozawa, Y., Yokoyama, S., Charoensombutamon, B., Emura, H., Alexander, R.N., Takeda, S., Yoshikawa, J.I., Menicucci, N.C., Yonezawa, H., Furusawa, A.: Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional clus- ter state. Science 366(6463), 373–376 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1126/science. aay2645

    doi:10.1126/science 2019

  4. [4]

    Science 366(6463), 369–372 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay4354

    Larsen, M.V., Guo, X., Breum, C.R., Neergaard-Nielsen, J.S., Andersen, U.L.: Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state. Science 366(6463), 369–372 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay4354

    doi:10.1126/science.aay4354 2019

  5. [5]

    Nature (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08406-9

    Aghaee Rad, H., Ainsworth, T., Alexander, R.N., Altieri, B., Askarani, M.F., Baby, R., Banchi, L., Baragiola, B.Q., Bourassa, J.E., Chadwick, R.S., Charania, I., Chen, H., Collins, M.J., Contu, P., D’Arcy, N., Dauphinais, G., De Prins, R., Deschenes, D., Di Luch, I., Duque, S., Edke, P., Fayer, S.E., Ferracin, S., Ferretti, H., Gefaell, J., Glancy, S., Go...

    2025

  6. [6]

    Nature Photonics 14(4), 240–244 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0583-3

    Sudbeck, J., Steinlechner, S., Korobko, M., Schnabel, R.: Demonstration of inter- ferometer enhancement through EPR entanglement. Nature Photonics 14(4), 240–244 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0583-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0583-3 2020

  7. [7]

    Physical Review Letters 104(10), 103602 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.103602

    Anisimov, P.M., Raterman, G.M., Chiruvelli, A., Plick, W.N., Huver, S.D., Lee, H., Dowling, J.P.: Quantum metrology with two-mode squeezed vacuum: parity detection beats the heisenberg limit. Physical Review Letters 104(10), 103602 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.103602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.103602 2010

  8. [8]

    Nature Reviews Physics 5(6), 326–338 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s42254-023-00583-2

    Couteau, C., Barz, S., Durt, T., Gerrits, T., Huwer, J., Prevedel, R., Rarity, J., Shields, A., Weihs, G.: Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing. Nature Reviews Physics 5(6), 326–338 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s42254-023-00583-2

    doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00583-2 2023

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Physical Review A 64(1), 012310 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012310

    Gottesman, D., Kitaev, A., Preskill, J.: Encoding a qubit in an oscillator. Physical Review A 64(1), 012310 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012310

    2001 doi

  2. [10]

    Physical Review Letters 123(20), 200502 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.123.200502

    Baragiola, B.Q., Pantaleoni, G., Alexander, R.N., Karanjai, A., Menicucci, N.C.: All-gaussian universality and fault tolerance with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code. Physical Review Letters 123(20), 200502 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.123.200502

    2019

  3. [11]

    Physical Review Research 3(4) (2021) https://doi.org/10

    Konno, S., Asavanant, W., Fukui, K., Sakaguchi, A., Hanamura, F., Marek, P., Filip, R., Yoshikawa, J., Furusawa, A.: Non-clifford gate on optical qubits by nonlinear feedforward. Physical Review Research 3(4) (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043026

    2021

  4. [12]

    Optics Letters 35(19), 3261–3 (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.003261

    Vasconcelos, H.M., Sanz, L., Glancy, S.: All-optical generation of states for ”encoding a qubit in an oscillator”. Optics Letters 35(19), 3261–3 (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.003261

    2010 doi

  5. [13]

    Physical Review A 97(2), 022341 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.022341 15

    Weigand, D.J., Terhal, B.M.: Generating grid states from Schr¨ odinger-cat states without postselection. Physical Review A 97(2), 022341 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.022341 15

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    New Journal of Physics 21(11) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab5330

    Eaton, M., Nehra, R., Pfister, O.: Non-gaussian and gottesman–kitaev–preskill state preparation by photon catalysis. New Journal of Physics 21(11) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab5330

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    Physical Review A 101(3) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.032315

    Tzitrin, I., Bourassa, J.E., Menicucci, N.C., Sabapathy, K.K.: Progress towards practical qubit computation using approximate Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes. Physical Review A 101(3) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.032315

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    npj Quantum Information 9(1) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41534-023-00772-y

    Takase, K., Fukui, K., Kawasaki, A., Asavanant, W., Endo, M., Yoshikawa, J., Loock, P., Furusawa, A.: Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill qubit synthesizer for prop- agating light. npj Quantum Information 9(1) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41534-023-00772-y

    2023

  9. [17]

    Physical Review A 59(4), 2631–2634 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.59.2631

    Cochrane, P.T., Milburn, G.J., Munro, W.J.: Macroscopically distinct quantum- superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping. Physical Review A 59(4), 2631–2634 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.59.2631

    1999 doi

  10. [18]

    Physical Review A 68(4) (2003) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042319

    Ralph, T.C., Gilchrist, A., Milburn, G.J., Munro, W.J., Glancy, S.: Quantum computation with optical coherent states. Physical Review A 68(4) (2003) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042319

    2003 doi

  11. [19]

    Science 383(6680), 289–293 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adk7560

    Konno, S., Asavanant, W., Hanamura, F., Nagayoshi, H., Fukui, K., Sakaguchi, A., Ide, R., China, F., Yabuno, M., Miki, S., Terai, H., Takase, K., Endo, M., Marek, P., Filip, R., Loock, P., Furusawa, A.: Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating lig...

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    Physical Review A 55(4), 3184–3194 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.55.3184

    Dakna, M., Anhut, T., Opatrn´ y, T., Kn¨ oll, L., Welsch, D.G.: Generating Schr¨ odinger-cat-like states by means of conditional measurements on a beam splitter. Physical Review A 55(4), 3184–3194 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.55.3184

    1997

  13. [21]

    Science312(5770), 83–6 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1122858

    Ourjoumtsev, A., Tualle-Brouri, R., Laurat, J., Grangier, P.: Generating optical Schr¨ odinger kittens for quantum information processing. Science312(5770), 83–6 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1122858

    2006 doi

  14. [22]

    Thesis, University of Copenhagen (2008)

    Neergaard-Nielsen, J.S.: Generation of single photons and Schr¨ odinger kitten states of light. Thesis, University of Copenhagen (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Optics Express 25(26), 32227 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1364/oe.25.032227

    Asavanant, W., Nakashima, K., Shiozawa, Y., Yoshikawa, J., Furusawa, A.: Generation of highly pure Schr¨ odinger’s cat states and real-time quadrature measurements via optical filtering. Optics Express 25(26), 32227 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1364/oe.25.032227

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    Physical Review A 103(1), 013710 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.013710 16

    Takase, K., Yoshikawa, J., Asavanant, W., Endo, M., Furusawa, A.: Generation of optical Schr¨ odinger cat states by generalized photon subtraction. Physical Review A 103(1), 013710 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.013710 16

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    Physical Review A 82(3), 031802 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.82.031802

    Gerrits, T., Glancy, S., Clement, T.S., Calkins, B., Lita, A.E., Miller, A.J., Migdall, A.L., Nam, S.W., Mirin, R.P., Knill, E.: Generation of optical coherent- state superpositions by number-resolved photon subtraction from the squeezed vacuum. Physical Review A 82(3), 031802...

    2010

  18. [26]

    Optics Express 31(8), 12865 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.486270

    Endo, M., He, R., Sonoyama, T., Takahashi, K., Kashiwazaki, T., Umeki, T., Takasu, S., Hattori, K., Fukuda, D., Fukui, K., Takase, K., Asavanant, W., Marek, P., Filip, R., Furusawa, A.: Non-gaussian quantum state generation by multi- photon subtraction at the telecommunication...

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    Optics Express 21(5), 5529–35 (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.005529

    Yukawa, M., Miyata, K., Mizuta, T., Yonezawa, H., Marek, P., Filip, R., Furu- sawa, A.: Generating superposition of up-to three photons for continuous variable quantum information processing. Optics Express 21(5), 5529–35 (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.005529

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    Physical Review Letters 109(23), 230503 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.230503

    Mari, A., Eisert, J.: Positive wigner functions render classical simulation of quantum computation efficient. Physical Review Letters 109(23), 230503 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.230503

    2012 doi

  21. [29]

    Applied Physics Letters 122(23) (2023) https://doi.org/10

    Kashiwazaki, T., Yamashima, T., Enbutsu, K., Kazama, T., Inoue, A., Fukui, K., Endo, M., Umeki, T., Furusawa, A.: Over-8-dB squeezed light generation by a broadband waveguide optical parametric amplifier toward fault-tolerant ultra-fast quantum computers. Applied Physics Lette...

    2023

  22. [30]

    Superconductor Science and Technology 35(9), 095002 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ac7e7b

    Hattori, K., Konno, T., Miura, Y., Takasu, S., Fukuda, D.: An optical transition- edge sensor with high energy resolution. Superconductor Science and Technology 35(9), 095002 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ac7e7b

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    Die Natur- wissenschaften 23(50), 844–849 (1935) https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01491987

    Schr¨ odinger, E.: Die gegenw¨ artige situation in der quantenmechanik. Die Natur- wissenschaften 23(50), 844–849 (1935) https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01491987

    1935 doi

  24. [32]

    Endo, M., Nomura, T., Sonoyama, T., Takahashi, K., Takasu, S., Fukuda, D., Kashiwazaki, T., Inoue, A., Umeki, T., Nehra, R., Marek, P., Filip, R., Takase, K., Asavanant, W., Furusawa, A.: Supplementary Information (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 81(1), 299–332 (2009) https://doi.org/10

    Lvovsky, A.I., Raymer, M.G.: Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomog- raphy. Reviews of Modern Physics 81(1), 299–332 (2009) https://doi.org/10. 1103/RevModPhys.81.299

    2009

  26. [34]

    Physical Review A 108(4) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.042430

    Fedotova, E., Kuznetsov, N., Tiunov, E., Ulanov, A.E., Lvovsky, A.I.: Continuous- variable quantum tomography of high-amplitude states. Physical Review A 108(4) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.042430

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    Quantum 3 (2019) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-03-11-129

    Killoran, N., Izaac, J., Quesada, N., Bergholm, V., Amy, M., Weedbrook, 17 C.: Strawberry fields: A software platform for photonic quantum computing. Quantum 3 (2019) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-03-11-129

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    Quantum Science and Technology 5(3) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab8504

    Bromley, T.R., Arrazola, J.M., Jahangiri, S., Izaac, J., Quesada, N., Gran, A.D., Schuld, M., Swinarton, J., Zabaneh, Z., Killoran, N.: Applications of near-term photonic quantum computers: software and algorithms. Quantum Science and Technology 5(3) (2020) https://doi.org/10....

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Science 317(5846), 1890–3 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146204

    Parigi, V., Zavatta, A., Kim, M., Bellini, M.: Probing quantum commutation rules by addition and subtraction of single photons to/from a light field. Science 317(5846), 1890–3 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146204

    2007 doi

  30. [38]

    Physical Review A 110(2) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.110.023703

    Chen, Y.-R., Hsieh, H.-Y., Ning, J., Wu, H.-C., Chen, H.L., Shi, Z.-H., Yang, P., Steuernagel, O., Wu, C.-M., Lee, R.-K.: Generation of heralded optical cat states by photon addition. Physical Review A 110(2) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.110.023703

    2024

  31. [39]

    npj Quantum Information 10(1) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00885-y

    Fadrn´ y, J., Neset, M., Bielak, M., Jeˇ zek, M., B´ ılek, J., Fiur´ aˇ sek, J.: Experi- mental preparation of multiphoton-added coherent states of light. npj Quantum Information 10(1) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00885-y

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    Physical Review A 100(5), 052301 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.052301

    Su, D., Myers, C.R., Sabapathy, K.K.: Conversion of gaussian states to non- gaussian states using photon-number-resolving detectors. Physical Review A 100(5), 052301 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.052301

    2019 doi

  33. [41]

    IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 46(8), 1206–1213 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/jqe.2010.2045475

    Umeki, T., Tadanaga, O., Asobe, M.: Highly efficient wavelength converter using direct-bonded ppznln ridge waveguide. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 46(8), 1206–1213 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/jqe.2010.2045475

    2010

  34. [42]

    High-Rate Four Photon Subtraction from Squeezed Vacuum: Preparing Cat State for Optical Quantum Computation

    Kashiwazaki, T., Yamashima, T., Takanashi, N., Inoue, A., Umeki, T., Furusawa, A.: Fabrication of low-loss quasi-single-mode ppln waveguide and its application to a modularized broadband high-level squeezer. Applied Physics Letters119(25), 251104 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063...

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    All optical fibers used in this experiment were polarization- maintaining (PM) fibers

    Pump and probe lights One of the multiple output ports of the mode-locked laser was used to generate both the pump and probe lights. All optical fibers used in this experiment were polarization- maintaining (PM) fibers. First, the spectrum of the output light was limited by an...

    1912

  36. [44]

    LO light The LO beam was obtained from a different output port of the mode-locked laser. In most pulsed-light experiments, the LO and pump beams are generated from the same port [S2–S5]; however, in that case the squeezed pulses after the OPA typically exhibit a shorter durati...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.