The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2502.12494 · v1 · pith:FURQWXB7 · submitted 2025-02-18 · cs.LG · cs.AI

EDGE: Efficient Data Selection for LLM Agents via Guideline Effectiveness

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:FURQWXB7record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords datafine-tuningguidelinesamplesagentsedgeeffectivenessengineering
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as AI agents. However, existing methods for enhancing LLM-agent abilities often lack a focus on data quality, leading to inefficiencies and suboptimal results in both fine-tuning and prompt engineering. To address this issue, we introduce EDGE, a novel approach for identifying informative samples without needing golden answers. We propose the Guideline Effectiveness (GE) metric, which selects challenging samples by measuring the impact of human-provided guidelines in multi-turn interaction tasks. A low GE score indicates that the human expertise required for a sample is missing from the guideline, making the sample more informative. By selecting samples with low GE scores, we can improve the efficiency and outcomes of both prompt engineering and fine-tuning processes for LLMs. Extensive experiments validate the performance of our method. Our method achieves competitive results on the HotpotQA and WebShop and datasets, requiring 75\% and 50\% less data, respectively, while outperforming existing methods. We also provide a fresh perspective on the data quality of LLM-agent fine-tuning.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Revisiting Robustness for LLM Safety Alignment via Selective Geometry Control

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ShaPO improves LLM safety robustness over standard preference optimization by enforcing worst-case objectives via selective geometry control at token and reward levels.