The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2502.15709 · v2 · pith:RY6J3P4O · submitted 2025-01-20 · cs.IR · cs.AI· cs.LG

TutorLLM: Customizing Learning Recommendations with Knowledge Tracing and Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Reviewed by Pithpith:RY6J3P4Oopen to challenge →

classification cs.IR cs.AIcs.LG
keywords learningllmstutorllmknowledgechallengesenhancegenerationintegration
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The integration of AI in education offers significant potential to enhance learning efficiency. Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Llama, allow students to query a wide range of topics, providing unprecedented flexibility. However, LLMs face challenges, such as handling varying content relevance and lack of personalization. To address these challenges, we propose TutorLLM, a personalized learning recommender LLM system based on Knowledge Tracing (KT) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). The novelty of TutorLLM lies in its unique combination of KT and RAG techniques with LLMs, which enables dynamic retrieval of context-specific knowledge and provides personalized learning recommendations based on the student's personal learning state. Specifically, this integration allows TutorLLM to tailor responses based on individual learning states predicted by the Multi-Features with Latent Relations BERT-based KT (MLFBK) model and to enhance response accuracy with a Scraper model. The evaluation includes user assessment questionnaires and performance metrics, demonstrating a 10% improvement in user satisfaction and a 5\% increase in quiz scores compared to using general LLMs alone.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Confidence Without Competence in AI-Assisted Knowledge Work

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Standard LLM chats produce high perceived understanding but low objective learning in students, while future-self explanations best align confidence with actual gains and guided hints maximize learning with moderate workload.