Performance Review on LLM for solving leetcode problems
read the original abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive performance evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) in solving programming challenges from Leetcode, a widely used platform for algorithm practice and technical interviews. We began by crawling the Leetcode website to collect a diverse set of problems encompassing various difficulty levels and topics. Using this dataset, we generated solutions with multiple LLMs, including GPT-4 and GPT-3.5-turbo (ChatGPT-turbo). The generated solutions were systematically evaluated for correctness and efficiency. We employed the pass@k metric to assess the success rates within a given number of attempts and analyzed the runtime performance of the solutions. Our results highlight the strengths and limitations of current LLMs [10] in code generation and problem-solving tasks, providing insights into their potential applications and areas for improvement in automated programming assistance.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the Stability of Prompt Ranking in Large Language Model Evaluation
Prompt rankings for LLMs show moderate overall correlation but frequent changes in the top prompt under random seeds and limited subsets; a lower-confidence-bound selection strategy improves robustness.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.