Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Conversational Planning for Personal Plans

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.19500 v1 pith:54ENCM54 submitted 2025-02-26 cs.AI cs.CLcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.HCcs.LG
keywords conversationaltaskscapabilitieslongpersonalplanningplansagents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The language generation and reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have enabled conversational systems with impressive performance in a variety of tasks, from code generation, to composing essays, to passing STEM and legal exams, to a new paradigm for knowledge search. Besides those short-term use applications, LLMs are increasingly used to help with real-life goals or tasks that take a long time to complete, involving multiple sessions across days, weeks, months, or even years. Thus to enable conversational systems for long term interactions and tasks, we need language-based agents that can plan for long horizons. Traditionally, such capabilities were addressed by reinforcement learning agents with hierarchical planning capabilities. In this work, we explore a novel architecture where the LLM acts as the meta-controller deciding the agent's next macro-action, and tool use augmented LLM-based option policies execute the selected macro-action. We instantiate this framework for a specific set of macro-actions enabling adaptive planning for users' personal plans through conversation and follow-up questions collecting user feedback. We show how this paradigm can be applicable in scenarios ranging from tutoring for academic and non-academic tasks to conversational coaching for personal health plans.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM-generated personalized nudges for improving pro-environmental behavior: Field evidence from resource conservation

    cs.CY 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    LLM-personalized weekly nudges cut electricity use by 0.56 kWh per room-day (18.3 percentage points more than text-only feedback) in a five-week randomized trial.

Pith tools