Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Semantic Integrity Constraints: Declarative Guardrails for AI-Augmented Data Processing Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.00600 v3 pith:XG3HOVBI submitted 2025-03-01 cs.DB cs.AIcs.CL

Semantic Integrity Constraints: Declarative Guardrails for AI-Augmented Data Processing Systems

classification cs.DB cs.AIcs.CL
keywords semanticai-augmentedconstraintsdatasicssystemsintegritydeclarative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

AI-augmented data processing systems (DPSs) integrate large language models (LLMs) into query pipelines, allowing powerful semantic operations on structured and unstructured data. However, the reliability (a.k.a. trust) of these systems is fundamentally challenged by the potential for LLMs to produce errors, limiting their adoption in critical domains. To help address this reliability bottleneck, we introduce semantic integrity constraints (SICs) -- a declarative abstraction for specifying and enforcing correctness conditions over LLM outputs in semantic queries. SICs generalize traditional database integrity constraints to semantic settings, supporting common types of constraints, such as grounding, soundness, and exclusion, with both reactive and proactive enforcement strategies. We argue that SICs provide a foundation for building reliable and auditable AI-augmented data systems. Specifically, we present a system design for integrating SICs into query planning and runtime execution and discuss its realization in AI-augmented DPSs. To guide and evaluate our vision, we outline several design goals -- covering criteria around expressiveness, runtime semantics, integration, performance, and enterprise-scale applicability -- and discuss how our framework addresses each, along with open research challenges.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Data Flow Control: Data Safety Policies for AI Agents

    cs.DB 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Data Flow Control formalizes data safety as aggregate predicates over provenance monomials and implements enforcement via the Passant query rewriting layer achieving near-zero overhead across five DBMS engines.