pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.03817 · v2 · pith:LIUCTGVQnew · submitted 2025-03-05 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-ph· hep-th

First look at continuous spin gravity: Time delay signatures

Shayarneel Kundu , Philip Schuster , Natalia Toro This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 00:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-phhep-th
keywords continuous spin gravitygravitational wavestime delayhelicity mixinglaser interferometersmodified gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Continuous spin gravity predicts gravitational wave time delays that deviate from general relativity by a fractional amount O(ρ_g/ω).

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the possibility that gravity is mediated by continuous spin particles carrying a non-zero invariant spin scale ρ_g. It constructs a linearized formalism for how these particles couple to ordinary spinless matter on flat spacetime. The resulting calculation for an idealized laser interferometer shows a time-delay effect whose size relative to general relativity scales as ρ_g divided by the gravitational wave frequency ω, but only when ω exceeds ρ_g; lower-frequency waves are damped. This frequency dependence implies that precision detectors operating at low frequencies could reach very small values of ρ_g.

Core claim

In continuous spin gravity the primary helicity-2 modes mix with a tower of other integer-helicity modes under boosts, with the mixing controlled by ρ_g. The linearized coupling of spinless matter to these modes on Minkowski space produces an interferometer time delay that deviates from the general-relativity prediction by a fractional amount O(ρ_g/ω) for frequencies above ρ_g, while waves with ω ≲ ρ_g have damped effects.

What carries the argument

Boost-induced mixing between helicity modes, with the invariant spin scale ρ_g setting the strength of the mixing, realized through a linearized coupling of spinless matter to continuous spin gravity on a Minkowski background.

If this is right

  • The fractional deviation grows inversely with frequency, becoming more pronounced at lower ω.
  • Waves with frequencies below ρ_g produce damped rather than enhanced effects.
  • Ground-based laser interferometers could reach spin scales at or below 10^{-14} eV.
  • Pulsar timing arrays could reach spin scales at or below 10^{-24} eV.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mixing mechanism could be applied to other propagation observables such as polarization or energy flux once the formalism is extended.
  • Nonlinear or curved-background corrections would need separate calculation to determine whether they preserve the leading linear time-delay scaling.

Load-bearing premise

The linearized formalism for coupling spinless matter to continuous spin gravity on a Minkowski background captures the leading time-delay effect from helicity mixing without higher-order corrections or nonlinearities altering the result.

What would settle it

A measurement of time delays for gravitational waves at frequencies near or below 10^{-14} eV that either shows or fails to show a fractional deviation scaling as O(ρ_g/ω) would confirm or rule out the predicted signature.

read the original abstract

We consider the possibility that gravity is mediated by "continuous spin" particles, i.e.~ massless particles whose invariant spin scale $\rho_g$ is non-zero. In this case, the primary helicity-2 modes of gravitational radiation on a Minkowski background mix with a tower of integer-helicity partner modes under boosts, with $\rho_g$ controlling the degree of mixing. We develop a formalism for coupling spinless matter to continuous spin gravity at linearized level. Using this formalism, we calculate the time-delay signatures induced by gravitational waves in an idealized laser interferometer detector. The fractional deviation from general relativity predictions is $O(\rho_g/\omega)$ for gravitational wave frequencies $\omega >\rho_g$, and the effects of waves with $\omega \lesssim \rho_g$ are damped. The precision and low frequency ranges of gravitational wave detectors suggest potential sensitivity to spin scales at or below $\sim 10^{-14}$ eV at ground-based laser interferometers and $\sim 10^{-24}$ eV at pulsar timing arrays, motivating further analysis of observable signatures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores the possibility that gravity is mediated by continuous spin particles with non-zero invariant spin scale ρ_g. On a Minkowski background the primary helicity-2 gravitational modes mix with a tower of integer-helicity partners under boosts, with ρ_g controlling the mixing. The authors develop a linearized formalism for coupling spinless matter to this theory and compute the resulting time-delay signatures in an idealized laser interferometer. The central result is a fractional deviation from general-relativity predictions of order O(ρ_g/ω) for frequencies ω > ρ_g, with damping for ω ≲ ρ_g; sensitivity estimates are given for ground-based interferometers (~10^{-14} eV) and pulsar timing arrays (~10^{-24} eV).

Significance. If the linearized calculation is robust, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable time-delay signature that could be searched for with existing and near-future gravitational-wave detectors. The explicit O(ρ_g/ω) scaling and the low-frequency damping are clear, testable outputs of the formalism rather than fitted parameters. The paper correctly highlights the precision and low-frequency reach of interferometers and PTAs as advantages for constraining small ρ_g. As a first exploration at linearized level on flat space, the result motivates but does not yet replace more complete treatments on curved backgrounds.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central scaling is stated without reference to the section or equation that derives it; adding a parenthetical pointer (e.g., “see §4.2, Eq. (27)”) would improve readability for readers who wish to verify the O(ρ_g/ω) result immediately.
  2. [Calculation of time-delay signatures] The idealized interferometer model is used throughout; a brief statement of the neglected higher-order or curvature corrections (even if shown to be sub-leading) would help bound the domain of validity of the quoted sensitivity estimates.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the recognition of the O(ρ_g/ω) scaling, low-frequency damping, and sensitivity reach of interferometers and PTAs. The recommendation for minor revision is noted; however, the report does not list any specific major comments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper develops a new linearized formalism for coupling spinless matter to continuous spin gravity on a Minkowski background and derives the time-delay signatures, including the O(ρ_g/ω) fractional deviation for ω > ρ_g and damping for lower frequencies, directly as outputs of that formalism applied to an idealized interferometer. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, renames a known result, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation whose content is unverified; the central results follow from the equations of the new coupling without circular reduction to the paper's own inputs or prior self-referential claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of a newly developed linearized coupling between spinless matter and continuous-spin gravitons; ρ_g is introduced as the controlling scale without independent evidence supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • ρ_g
    Invariant spin scale that sets the strength of helicity mixing and is the quantity to be bounded or detected by the time-delay measurement.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linearized gravity on Minkowski background suffices for the leading time-delay effect
    The calculation is performed at linearized level as stated in the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper Continuous spin particles mediate gravity with the stated boost mixing
    The mixing of primary helicity-2 modes with partner modes is taken as the defining property of the continuous-spin framework.
invented entities (1)
  • continuous spin graviton no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediator of gravity whose non-zero ρ_g produces observable deviations from GR in wave propagation
    Postulated alternative to the standard massless spin-2 graviton; no independent evidence is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5717 in / 1498 out tokens · 35645 ms · 2026-05-23T00:56:12.602902+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Eugene P. Wigner. On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group. Annals Math., 40:149–204, 1939. doi: 10.2307/1968551

    work page doi:10.2307/1968551 1939

  2. [2]

    Feynman Rules for Any Spin

    Steven Weinberg. Feynman Rules for Any Spin. 2. Massless Particles.Phys. Rev., 134: B882–B896, 1964. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.134.B882

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.134.b882 1964

  3. [3]

    Photons and Gravitons inS-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conservation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass.Phys

    Steven Weinberg. Photons and Gravitons inS-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conservation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass.Phys. Rev., 135:B1049–B1056,

    work page

  4. [4]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.135.B1049

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.135.b1049

  5. [5]

    Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of Maxwell’s and Einstein’s equations.Phys

    Steven Weinberg. Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of Maxwell’s and Einstein’s equations.Phys. Rev., 138:B988–B1002, 1965. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.138.B988

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.138.b988 1965

  6. [6]

    Limits on Massless Particles.Phys

    Steven Weinberg and Edward Witten. Limits on Massless Particles.Phys. Lett. B , 96:59–62,

    work page

  7. [7]

    doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(80)90212-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90212-9

  8. [8]

    On the Theory of Continuous-Spin Particles: Wavefunctions and Soft-Factor Scattering Amplitudes.JHEP, 09:104, 2013

    Philip Schuster and Natalia Toro. On the Theory of Continuous-Spin Particles: Wavefunctions and Soft-Factor Scattering Amplitudes.JHEP, 09:104, 2013. doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2013)104

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2013)104 2013

  9. [9]

    On the Theory of Continuous-Spin Particles: Helicity Correspondence in Radiation and Forces.JHEP, 09:105, 2013

    Philip Schuster and Natalia Toro. On the Theory of Continuous-Spin Particles: Helicity Correspondence in Radiation and Forces.JHEP, 09:105, 2013. doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2013)105

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2013)105 2013

  10. [10]

    A Gauge Field Theory of Continuous-Spin Particles

    Philip Schuster and Natalia Toro. A Gauge Field Theory of Continuous-Spin Particles. JHEP, 10:061, 2013. doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2013)061

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2013)061 2013

  11. [11]

    Continuous-spin particle field theory with helicity correspondence

    Philip Schuster and Natalia Toro. Continuous-spin particle field theory with helicity correspondence. Phys. Rev. D , 91:025023, 2015. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.025023

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.025023 2015

  12. [12]

    Interactions of Particles with ”Continuous Spin” Fields.JHEP, 04:010, 2023

    Philip Schuster, Natalia Toro, and Kevin Zhou. Interactions of Particles with ”Continuous Spin” Fields.JHEP, 04:010, 2023. doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2023)010

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2023)010 2023

  13. [13]

    Quantum electrodynamics mediated by a photon with continuous spin

    Philip Schuster and Natalia Toro. Quantum electrodynamics mediated by a photon with continuous spin. Phys. Rev. D , 109(9):096008, 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.096008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.096008 2024

  14. [14]

    Continuous-Spin Particles, On Shell

    Brando Bellazzini, Stefano De Angelis, and Marcello Romano. Continuous-Spin Particles, On Shell. 6 2024. – 21 –

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    I. L. Buchbinder, S. Fedoruk, A. P. Isaev, and V. A. Krykhtin. Towards Lagrangian construction for infinite half-integer spin field.Nucl. Phys. B , 958:115114, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115114

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115114 2020

  16. [16]

    Burdík, V

    Č. Burdík, V. K. Pandey, and A. Reshetnyak. BRST–BFV and BRST–BV descriptions for bosonic fields with continuous spin onR1,d−1. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , 35(26):2050154, 2020. doi: 10.1142/S0217751X20501547

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x20501547 2020

  17. [17]

    I. L. Buchbinder, S. James Gates, and K. Koutrolikos. Superfield continuous spin equations of motion. Phys. Lett. B , 793:445–450, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.015 2019

  18. [18]

    Unified formulation for helicity and continuous spin fermionic fields.JHEP, 11:050, 2018

    Konstantin Alkalaev, Alexander Chekmenev, and Maxim Grigoriev. Unified formulation for helicity and continuous spin fermionic fields.JHEP, 11:050, 2018. doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2018)050

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2018)050 2018

  19. [19]

    Rivelles

    Victor O. Rivelles. A Gauge Field Theory for Continuous Spin Tachyons. 7 2018

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    I. L. Buchbinder, V. A. Krykhtin, and H. Takata. BRST approach to Lagrangian construction for bosonic continuous spin field.Phys. Lett. B , 785:315–319, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.070

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.070 2018

  21. [21]

    Alkalaev and Maxim A

    Konstantin B. Alkalaev and Maxim A. Grigoriev. Continuous spin fields of mixed-symmetry type. JHEP, 03:030, 2018. doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2018)030

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2018)030 2018

  22. [22]

    M. V. Khabarov and Yu. M. Zinoviev. Infinite (continuous) spin fields in the frame-like formalism. Nucl. Phys. B , 928:182–216, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.01.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.01.016 2018

  23. [23]

    Skvortsov

    Xavier Bekaert and Evgeny D. Skvortsov. Elementary particles with continuous spin.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , 32(23n24):1730019, 2017. doi: 10.1142/S0217751X17300198

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x17300198 2017

  24. [24]

    Modified Wigner equations and continuous spin gauge field.Phys

    Mojtaba Najafizadeh. Modified Wigner equations and continuous spin gauge field.Phys. Rev. D, 97(6):065009, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.065009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.065009 2018

  25. [25]

    Yu. M. Zinoviev. Infinite spin fields in d = 3 and beyond.Universe, 3(3):63, 2017. doi: 10.3390/universe3030063

    work page doi:10.3390/universe3030063 2017

  26. [26]

    R. R. Metsaev. BRST-BV approach to continuous-spin field.Phys. Lett. B , 781:568–573,

    work page

  27. [27]

    doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.04.038

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.04.038 2018

  28. [28]

    Rivelles

    Victor O. Rivelles. Remarks on a Gauge Theory for Continuous Spin Particles.Eur. Phys. J. C, 77(7):433, 2017. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4927-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4927-1 2017

  29. [29]

    Bekaert, M

    X. Bekaert, M. Najafizadeh, and M. R. Setare. A gauge field theory of fermionic Continuous-Spin Particles. Phys. Lett. B , 760:320–323, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.07.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.07.005 2016

  30. [30]

    Rivelles

    Victor O. Rivelles. Gauge Theory Formulations for Continuous and Higher Spin Fields. Phys. Rev. D , 91(12):125035, 2015. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.125035

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.125035 2015

  31. [31]

    A comment on continuous spin representations of the Poincare group and perturbative string theory.Fortsch

    Anamaria Font, Fernando Quevedo, and Stefan Theisen. A comment on continuous spin representations of the Poincare group and perturbative string theory.Fortsch. Phys., 62: 975–980, 2014. doi: 10.1002/prop.201400067

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.201400067 2014

  32. [32]

    How higher-spin gravity surpasses the spin two barrier: no-go theorems versus yes-go examples.Rev

    Xavier Bekaert, Nicolas Boulanger, and Per Sundell. How higher-spin gravity surpasses the spin two barrier: no-go theorems versus yes-go examples.Rev. Mod. Phys., 84:987–1009,

    work page

  33. [33]

    doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.987

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.987

  34. [34]

    Bekaert and J

    X. Bekaert and J. Mourad. The Continuous spin limit of higher spin field equations.JHEP, 01:115, 2006. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/01/115. – 22 –

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/01/115 2006

  35. [35]

    Khan and Pierre Ramond

    Abu M. Khan and Pierre Ramond. Continuous spin representations from group contraction. J. Math. Phys. , 46:053515, 2005. doi: 10.1063/1.1897663. [Erratum: J.Math.Phys. 46, 079901 (2005)]

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1897663 2005

  36. [36]

    Arkady Yu. Segal. Point particle in general background fields vsersus gauge theories of traceless symmetric tensors. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , 18:4999–5021, 2003. doi: 10.1142/S0217751X03015830

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x03015830 2003

  37. [37]

    Freedman

    Bernard de Wit and Daniel Z. Freedman. Systematics of Higher Spin Gauge Fields.Phys. Rev. D, 21:358, 1980. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.21.358

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.21.358 1980

  38. [38]

    Fang and C

    J. Fang and C. Fronsdal. Massless Fields with Half Integral Spin.Phys. Rev. D , 18:3630,

    work page

  39. [39]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3630

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.3630

  40. [40]

    Massless Fields with Integer Spin.Phys

    Christian Fronsdal. Massless Fields with Integer Spin.Phys. Rev. D , 18:3624, 1978. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3624

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.3624 1978

  41. [41]

    K. Hirata. Quantization of Massless Fields with Continuous Spin.Prog. Theor. Phys., 58: 652–666, 1977. doi: 10.1143/PTP.58.652

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.58.652 1977

  42. [42]

    L. F. Abbott. Massless Particles with Continuous Spin Indices.Phys. Rev. D , 13:2291, 1976. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.2291

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.13.2291 1976

  43. [43]

    L. P. S. Singh and C. R. Hagen. Lagrangian formulation for arbitrary spin. 1. The boson case. Phys. Rev. D , 9:898–909, 1974. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.898

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.898 1974

  44. [44]

    L. P. S. Singh and C. R. Hagen. Lagrangian formulation for arbitrary spin. 2. The fermion case. Phys. Rev. D , 9:910–920, 1974. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.910

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.910 1974

  45. [45]

    Chakrabarti

    A. Chakrabarti. Remarks on lightlike continuous spin and spacelike representations of the poincare group. J. Math. Phys. , 12:1813–1822, 1971. doi: 10.1063/1.1665809

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1665809 1971

  46. [46]

    Yngvason

    J. Yngvason. Zero-mass infinite spin representations of the poincare group and quantum field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. , 18:195–203, 1970. doi: 10.1007/BF01649432

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01649432 1970

  47. [47]

    I. L. Buchbinder, S. A. Fedoruk, A. P. Isaev, and V. A. Krykhtin. On the off-shell superfield Lagrangian formulation of 4D, N=1 supersymmetric infinite spin theory.Phys. Lett. B , 829: 137139, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137139

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137139 2022

  48. [48]

    Off-shell supersymmetric continuous spin gauge theory.JHEP, 02:038,

    Mojtaba Najafizadeh. Off-shell supersymmetric continuous spin gauge theory.JHEP, 02:038,

    work page

  49. [49]

    doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2022)038

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2022)038 2022

  50. [50]

    Supersymmetric Continuous Spin Gauge Theory.JHEP, 03:027, 2020

    Mojtaba Najafizadeh. Supersymmetric Continuous Spin Gauge Theory.JHEP, 03:027, 2020. doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2020)027

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2020)027 2020

  51. [51]

    I. L. Buchbinder, A. P. Isaev, and S. A. Fedoruk. Massless Infinite Spin (Super)particles and Fields. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. , 309(1):46–56, 2020. doi: 10.1134/S0081543820030049

    work page doi:10.1134/s0081543820030049 2020

  52. [52]

    I. L. Buchbinder, M. V. Khabarov, T. V. Snegirev, and Yu. M. Zinoviev. Lagrangian formulation for the infinite spinN=1 supermultiplets ind=4. Nucl. Phys. B , 946:114717,

    work page

  53. [53]

    doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114717

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114717 2019

  54. [54]

    R. R. Metsaev. Mixed-symmetry continuous-spin fields in flat and AdS spaces.Phys. Lett. B, 820:136497, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136497

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136497 2021

  55. [55]

    R. R. Metsaev. Light-cone continuous-spin field in AdS space.Phys. Lett. B , 793:134–140,

    work page

  56. [56]

    doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.04.041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.04.041 2019

  57. [57]

    R. R. Metsaev. Fermionic continuous spin gauge field in (A)dS space.Phys. Lett. B , 773: 135–141, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.08.020. – 23 –

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.08.020 2017

  58. [58]

    R. R. Metsaev. Continuous spin gauge field in (A)dS space.Phys. Lett. B , 767:458–464,

    work page

  59. [59]

    doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.02.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.02.027 2017

  60. [60]

    I. L. Buchbinder, S. A. Fedoruk, A. P. Isaev, and V. A. Krykhtin. BRST construction for infinite spin field onAdS4. Eur. Phys. J. Plus , 139(7):621, 2024. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05430-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05430-6 2024

  61. [61]

    R. R. Metsaev. Continuous-spin mixed-symmetry fields in AdS(5).J. Phys. A , 51(21): 215401, 2018. doi: 10.1088/1751-8121/aabcda

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aabcda 2018

  62. [62]

    R. R. Metsaev. Cubic interaction vertices for massive/massless continuous-spin fields and arbitrary spin fields.JHEP, 12:055, 2018. doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2018)055

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2018)055 2018

  63. [63]

    Continuous-spin field propagator and interaction with matter.JHEP, 11:113, 2017

    Xavier Bekaert, Jihad Mourad, and Mojtaba Najafizadeh. Continuous-spin field propagator and interaction with matter.JHEP, 11:113, 2017. doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2017)113

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)113 2017

  64. [64]

    R. R. Metsaev. Cubic interaction vertices for continuous-spin fields and arbitrary spin massive fields. JHEP, 11:197, 2017. doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2017)197

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)197 2017

  65. [65]

    Strong obstruction of the Berends-Burgers-van Dam spin-3 vertex.J

    Xavier Bekaert, Nicolas Boulanger, and Serge Leclercq. Strong obstruction of the Berends-Burgers-van Dam spin-3 vertex.J. Phys. A , 43:185401, 2010. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/43/18/185401

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/18/185401 2010

  66. [66]

    Berends, G

    Frits A. Berends, G. J. H. Burgers, and H. van Dam. Explicit construction of conserved currents for massless fields of arbitrary spin.Nucl. Phys. B , 271:429–441, 1986. doi: 10.1016/S0550-3213(86)80019-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(86)80019-0 1986

  67. [67]

    Berends, G

    Frits A. Berends, G. J. H. Burgers, and H. van Dam. On the Theoretical Problems in Constructing Interactions Involving Higher Spin Massless Particles.Nucl. Phys. B , 260: 295–322, 1985. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90074-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90074-4 1985

  68. [68]

    G. J. Iverson and G. Mack. Quantum fields and interactions of massless particles - the continuous spin case.Annals Phys., 64:211–253, 1971. doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(71)90284-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(71)90284-3 1971

  69. [69]

    G. J. Iverson and G. Mack. Theory of weak interactions with *continuous-spin* neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D , 2:2326–2333, 1970. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2326

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.2.2326 1970

  70. [70]

    On the Thermodynamics of Continuous Spin photons

    Philip Schuster, Gowri Sundaresan, and Natalia Toro. On the Thermodynamics of Continuous Spin photons. 6 2024

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(6):061102, 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  72. [72]

    Oxford Univer- sity Press (2018).https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814788.001.0001

    Michele Maggiore. Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments . Oxford University Press, 2007. ISBN 978-0-19-171766-6, 978-0-19-852074-0. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001 2007

  73. [73]

    Misner, K

    Charles W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler.Gravitation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973. ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0, 978-0-691-17779-3

    work page 1973

  74. [74]

    Sean M. Carroll. Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity . Cambridge University Press, 7 2019. ISBN 978-0-8053-8732-2, 978-1-108-48839-6, 978-1-108-77555-7. doi: 10.1017/9781108770385

    work page doi:10.1017/9781108770385 2019

  75. [75]

    Gravity and Strings

    Tomas Ortin. Gravity and Strings . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. edition, 7 2015. ISBN 978-0-521-76813-9, 978-0-521-76813-9, 978-1-316-23579-9. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139019750. – 24 –

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139019750 2015

  76. [76]

    L. P. Grishchuk. Particle drift in the field of a gravitational wave.Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. , 66: 833–837, 1974

    work page 1974

  77. [77]

    Probing anisotropies of the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with LISA

    Nicola Bartolo et al. Probing anisotropies of the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with LISA. JCAP, 11:009, 2022. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/009

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/009 2022

  78. [78]

    Testing modified gravity at cosmological distances with LISA standard sirens

    Enis Belgacem et al. Testing modified gravity at cosmological distances with LISA standard sirens. JCAP, 07:024, 2019. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/024

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/024 2019

  79. [79]

    K. G. Arun et al. New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA.Living Rev. Rel., 25(1): 4, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s41114-022-00036-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00036-9 2022

  80. [80]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Pau Amaro-Seoane et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. 2 2017

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.