Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Novice Developers' Perspectives on Adopting LLMs for Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.07556 v2 pith:X2WRWUJK submitted 2025-03-10 cs.SE cs.AI

Novice Developers' Perspectives on Adopting LLMs for Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review

classification cs.SE cs.AI
keywords developerssoftwarestudiesllmsnovicedevelopmentengineeringresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Following the rise of large language models (LLMs), many studies have emerged in recent years focusing on exploring the adoption of LLM-based tools for software development by novice developers: computer science/software engineering students and early-career industry developers with two years or less of professional experience. These studies have sought to understand the perspectives of novice developers on using these tools, a critical aspect of the successful adoption of LLMs in software engineering. To systematically collect and summarise these studies, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) following the guidelines by Kitchenham et al. on 80 primary studies published between April 2022 and June 2025 to answer four research questions (RQs). In answering RQ1, we categorised the study motivations and methodological approaches. In RQ2, we identified the software development tasks for which novice developers use LLMs. In RQ3, we categorised the advantages, challenges, and recommendations discussed in the studies. Finally, we discuss the study limitations and future research needs suggested in the primary studies in answering RQ4. Throughout the paper, we also indicate directions for future work and implications for software engineering researchers, educators, and developers. Our research artifacts are publicly available at https://github.com/Samuellucas97/SupplementaryInfoPackage-SLR.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mitigating Prompt-Induced Cognitive Biases in General-Purpose AI for Software Engineering

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A prompting method that forces GPAI models to state SE best practices before deciding reduces prompt-induced cognitive biases by 51% on average across eight tested biases.

  2. From Junior to Senior: Allocating Agency and Navigating Professional Growth in Agentic AI-Mediated Software Engineering

    cs.HC 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Organizational policies constrain agency in AI-mediated software engineering more than individual preferences, with seniors using detailed delegation and pre-AI instincts while juniors oscillate between over-reliance ...

  3. Walking the Tightrope of LLMs for Software Development: A Practitioners' Perspective

    cs.SE 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    Qualitative interview study with 22 practitioners identifies multi-level benefits, challenges, and mitigation strategies for using LLMs in software development.