REVIEW 3 cited by
Novice Developers' Perspectives on Adopting LLMs for Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Novice Developers' Perspectives on Adopting LLMs for Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review
read the original abstract
Following the rise of large language models (LLMs), many studies have emerged in recent years focusing on exploring the adoption of LLM-based tools for software development by novice developers: computer science/software engineering students and early-career industry developers with two years or less of professional experience. These studies have sought to understand the perspectives of novice developers on using these tools, a critical aspect of the successful adoption of LLMs in software engineering. To systematically collect and summarise these studies, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) following the guidelines by Kitchenham et al. on 80 primary studies published between April 2022 and June 2025 to answer four research questions (RQs). In answering RQ1, we categorised the study motivations and methodological approaches. In RQ2, we identified the software development tasks for which novice developers use LLMs. In RQ3, we categorised the advantages, challenges, and recommendations discussed in the studies. Finally, we discuss the study limitations and future research needs suggested in the primary studies in answering RQ4. Throughout the paper, we also indicate directions for future work and implications for software engineering researchers, educators, and developers. Our research artifacts are publicly available at https://github.com/Samuellucas97/SupplementaryInfoPackage-SLR.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Mitigating Prompt-Induced Cognitive Biases in General-Purpose AI for Software Engineering
A prompting method that forces GPAI models to state SE best practices before deciding reduces prompt-induced cognitive biases by 51% on average across eight tested biases.
-
From Junior to Senior: Allocating Agency and Navigating Professional Growth in Agentic AI-Mediated Software Engineering
Organizational policies constrain agency in AI-mediated software engineering more than individual preferences, with seniors using detailed delegation and pre-AI instincts while juniors oscillate between over-reliance ...
-
Walking the Tightrope of LLMs for Software Development: A Practitioners' Perspective
Qualitative interview study with 22 practitioners identifies multi-level benefits, challenges, and mitigation strategies for using LLMs in software development.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.