Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.09858 v1 pith:WUPUMKAQ submitted 2025-03-12 cs.AI cs.GTcs.MAnlin.CD

Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis

classification cs.AI cs.GTcs.MAnlin.CD
keywords mediaregulationeffectivegame-theoreticgovernanceanalysisdevelopersdevelopment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper investigates the complex interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems. Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes. The research explores two key mechanisms for achieving responsible governance, safe AI development and adoption of safe AI: incentivising effective regulation through media reporting, and conditioning user trust on commentariats' recommendation. The findings highlight the crucial role of the media in providing information to users, potentially acting as a form of "soft" regulation by investigating developers or regulators, as a substitute to institutional AI regulation (which is still absent in many regions). Both game-theoretic analysis and LLM-based simulations reveal conditions under which effective regulation and trustworthy AI development emerge, emphasising the importance of considering the influence of different regulatory regimes from an evolutionary game-theoretic perspective. The study concludes that effective governance requires managing incentives and costs for high quality commentaries.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Numbers Start Talking: Implicit Numerical Coordination Among LLM-Based Agents

    cs.MA 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLM agents exhibit emergent covert numerical coordination in canonical game settings under restricted or absent communication, shaping strategic outcomes.

  2. Trust or Check? Understanding the (Evolutionary) Dynamics of User Trust in AI Systems

    cs.AI 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0

    In an evolutionary game where trust is reduced monitoring, safe and widely adopted AI is the stable outcome only when punishment for unsafe development exceeds the cost of safety and monitoring is affordable.