pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.14481 · v3 · pith:V5MA3BOKnew · submitted 2025-03-18 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CL

Don't lie to your friends: Learning what you know from collaborative self-play

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CL
keywords agentscapabilitieswhencollaborativeemphknowmulti-agentmust
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

To be helpful assistants, AI agents must be aware of their own capabilities and limitations. This includes knowing when to answer from parametric knowledge versus using tools, when to trust tool outputs, and when to abstain or hedge. Such capabilities are hard to teach through supervised fine-tuning because they require constructing examples that reflect the agent's specific capabilities. We therefore propose a radically new approach to teaching agents what they know: \emph{collaborative self-play}. We construct multi-agent collaborations in which the group is rewarded for collectively arriving at correct answers. The desired meta-knowledge emerges from the incentives built into the structure of the interaction. We focus on small societies of agents that have access to heterogeneous tools (corpus-specific retrieval), and therefore must collaborate to maximize their success while minimizing their effort. Experiments show that group-level rewards for multi-agent communities can induce policies that \emph{transfer} to improve tool use and selective prediction in settings where individual agents are deployed in isolation.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. To Call or Not to Call: A Framework to Assess and Optimize LLM Tool Calling

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A normative-descriptive framework shows LLMs' tool-calling perceptions misalign with true need/utility for web search, and hidden-state estimators improve decisions over self-perceived baselines.

  2. Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLMs need metacognition to align expressed uncertainty with their actual knowledge boundaries, moving beyond knowledge expansion to reduce confident errors.

  3. To Call or Not to Call: A Framework to Assess and Optimize LLM Tool Calling

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLMs often misalign their self-perceived need for tools with true need and utility, but lightweight estimators trained on hidden states can improve tool-calling decisions and task performance across multiple models and tasks.