Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Integrating Large Language Models for Automated Structural Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.09754 v1 pith:GOOUZV2X submitted 2025-04-13 cs.SE cs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.LG
keywords structuralanalysisframeworkllmsautomatedgenerativesawpsbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Automated analysis for engineering structures offers considerable potential for boosting efficiency by minimizing repetitive tasks. Although AI-driven methods are increasingly common, no systematic framework yet leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for automatic structural analysis. To address this gap, we propose a novel framework that integrates LLMs with structural analysis software. LLMs serve as the core engine: they parse structural descriptions from text and translate them into executable Python scripts. Moreover, the framework integrates the generative capabilities of LLMs with code-based finite element (FE) tools like OpenSeesPy. It employs domain-specific prompt design and in-context learning strategies to enhance the LLM's problem-solving capabilities and generative stability, enabling fully automated structural analysis from descriptive text to model outputs. In our experiments, we introduce a well-curated small-scale benchmark dataset of 20 structural analysis word problems (SAWPs) with ground-truth solutions and evaluate the performance of different LLMs within our framework in solving these SAWPs. The role of system instructions, crafted by structural engineers, is also investigated to understand their impact on LLM-driven structural analysis. Additionally, the generative stability of our framework is examined. Through multiple validation experiments on the benchmark, our results demonstrate that the proposed framework can substantially increase the level of automation in solving SAWPs compared to traditional methods. Quantitatively, the framework, built on GPT-4o, achieved 100% accuracy, surpassing GPT-4 (85%), Gemini 1.5 Pro (80%), and Llama-3.3 (30%) on the test examples. Furthermore, integrating domain-specific instructions enhanced performance by 30% on problems with asymmetrical structural configurations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Automating structural reliability analysis with a multi-agent large language model framework

    stat.AP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-agent LLM framework automates structural reliability analysis from natural-language input to interpreted β and Pf, with a QLoRA-tuned method-planning agent.

  2. StructureClaw: Traceable LLM Agents and an Executable Benchmark for Structural Engineering Workflows

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    StructureClaw shows that evaluating LLM agents on complete, executable artifact chains—not final answers—raises structural-engineering workflow success from 56.8% (generic) to 88.6% (automatic) and pinpoints invalid-i...

  3. Rethinking Scientific Modeling: Toward Physically Consistent and Simulation-Executable Programmatic Generation

    cs.SE 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A physics-aware two-stage SFT+GRPO training method with period/AST/sandbox rewards raises small open LLMs from ~0-2% to ~68-77% on a strict OpenSeesPy building-modeling benchmark (BMEval).

Pith tools