pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.16452 · v2 · submitted 2025-04-23 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.IM· quant-ph

How gravitational waves change photon orbital angular momentum quantum states

Haorong Wu , Xilong Fan , Lixiang Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 19:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.IMquant-ph
keywords gravitational wavesorbital angular momentumphoton transitionsquantum statesvortex lightgravitational wave detectionlinearized gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravitational waves can cause photons with orbital angular momentum l to transition to states l±1 and l±2.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that gravitational waves interact with vortex light to induce transitions between quantized orbital angular momentum states of photons. Using linearized gravity and quantization of the electromagnetic field, the authors calculate small transition probabilities for changes in OAM by 1 or 2 units. If correct, this interaction opens a path to detecting gravitational waves through changes in light's twisting properties rather than interference patterns, potentially covering a broader frequency range and avoiding some noise issues in current detectors.

Core claim

When a photon possessing OAM of l interacts with GWs, the OAM modes of l±1 and l±2 may be excited with probabilities of P_{l±1}∼10^{-17} and P_{l±2}∼10^{-20}, respectively. Higher probabilities occur with increased photon radial wave vector, longer propagation distance, stronger GW amplitudes, or smaller GW frequencies. This leads to a proposed new GW detection technique with advantages in frequency range, seismic noise insensitivity, and source distance determination.

What carries the argument

The perturbative interaction between gravitational wave metric perturbations and the photon's orbital angular momentum modes, derived from wave propagation in curved spacetime and canonical quantization.

If this is right

  • Transition probabilities increase with larger photon radial wave vector or longer interaction distance.
  • Stronger gravitational wave amplitudes or lower frequencies lead to higher transition rates.
  • The method allows detection across a wide range of gravitational wave frequencies.
  • It is insensitive to seismic noise compared to interferometer-based detectors.
  • It provides better capability for determining the distance to the gravitational wave source.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could be combined with existing laser systems to create compact detectors.
  • Observations of specific OAM transitions might help characterize the polarization or direction of incoming gravitational waves.
  • Laboratory tests with simulated gravitational wave-like fields could validate the effect before astronomical application.

Load-bearing premise

The gravitational wave amplitude is small enough that first-order perturbative effects dominate in the linearized gravity approximation.

What would settle it

Measuring the fraction of photons that change from OAM state l to l+1 after propagating a known distance through a gravitational wave of known amplitude and frequency, and checking if it matches the predicted 10^{-17} scale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.16452 by Haorong Wu, Lixiang Chen, Xilong Fan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The path for integral with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a, where the wavefront is a plane of uniform phase. The brightness in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The rate of detected photon ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explore the evolution of vortex light in the presence of gravitational waves (GWs) and demonstrate that the quantized orbital angular momentum (OAM) states can make transitions to other states due to the GWs. The interaction is calculated based on the framework of the wave propagation in linearized gravity theory and canonical quantization of the light field in curved spacetime. It is found that when a photon possessing OAM of $l$ interacts with GWs, the OAM modes of $l\pm1$ and $l\pm2$ may be excited with probabilities of $P_{l\pm1}\sim 10^{-17}$ and $P_{l\pm2}\sim 10^{-20}$, respectively. Higher probabilities of the transitions can be achieved when the photon radial wave vector or the propagation distance is increased, or when the photons encounter GWs with stronger amplitudes or smaller frequencies. Thus, a new GW detection technique is proposed, which may exhibit good performance in a wide range of GW frequencies. Furthermore, the detector is insensitive to seismic noise and is more advantageous for determining the distance of the source compared to current interferometer detectors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores the evolution of photons carrying orbital angular momentum (OAM) in the presence of gravitational waves using linearized gravity theory and canonical quantization of the electromagnetic field in curved spacetime. It derives transition probabilities showing that an initial OAM state l can be excited to l±1 and l±2 modes with probabilities P_{l±1}∼10^{-17} and P_{l±2}∼10^{-20}, respectively, and proposes this interaction as the basis for a new gravitational-wave detection technique that is insensitive to seismic noise and advantageous for source-distance determination.

Significance. If the first-order perturbative results remain valid in the relevant regime, the work would provide a novel quantum-optical approach to gravitational-wave detection that complements existing interferometric methods, particularly in frequency bands where seismic noise is problematic. The combination of OAM quantization with curved-spacetime field theory is a technically interesting extension, though the extremely small probabilities require careful validation of the perturbative framework.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3] §3 (transition-probability derivation): the reported probabilities are obtained from first-order time-dependent perturbation theory applied to the interaction Hamiltonian. The expressions increase with propagation distance L (or radial wave-vector component), consistent with P∝T² scaling for off-resonant transitions, yet no explicit check is supplied on the domain where the first-order result stays ≪1 or where secular-term/resummation effects remain negligible for the quoted GW frequencies and photon energies.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that higher probabilities are achieved by increasing radial wave vector or propagation distance, but the main text would benefit from an explicit scaling relation (e.g., P∝L²) together with the numerical values of the parameters used to obtain the 10^{-17} and 10^{-20} figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting the importance of validating the perturbative framework. The comment is well taken, and we address it directly below with a commitment to strengthen the presentation in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (transition-probability derivation): the reported probabilities are obtained from first-order time-dependent perturbation theory applied to the interaction Hamiltonian. The expressions increase with propagation distance L (or radial wave-vector component), consistent with P∝T² scaling for off-resonant transitions, yet no explicit check is supplied on the domain where the first-order result stays ≪1 or where secular-term/resummation effects remain negligible for the quoted GW frequencies and photon energies.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit check on the validity of first-order time-dependent perturbation theory is necessary. In the manuscript the transition probabilities remain extremely small (P_{l±1} ∼ 10^{-17}, P_{l±2} ∼ 10^{-20}) for realistic GW strains (h ∼ 10^{-21}), frequencies (10–1000 Hz), and optical photon energies. Because the interaction is off-resonant, the probabilities grow quadratically with propagation distance L (or interaction time T), yet they stay many orders of magnitude below unity even for L up to several kilometers. To make this domain of validity transparent we will add a short subsection (or appendix) that (i) recalls the standard condition |⟨f|V|i⟩T/ℏ| ≪ 1 for the perturbative expansion to hold, (ii) evaluates the matrix element for the quoted parameter range, and (iii) confirms that secular terms do not require resummation because the detuning greatly exceeds the coupling strength. These additions will be purely clarificatory and will not change the reported probabilities or the proposed detection concept. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation is self-contained first-principles calculation with no reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper derives OAM transition probabilities from the interaction Hamiltonian obtained by substituting the linearized GW metric perturbation into the quantized electromagnetic field Hamiltonian in curved spacetime, then applies standard time-dependent perturbation theory to compute matrix elements between OAM modes. The resulting P_{l±1} and P_{l±2} follow directly from the first-order time integral of the coupling term without any fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations that close the loop. Scaling with propagation distance L or radial wave vector arises explicitly from the phase-matching integral in the perturbative expression and does not constitute a renaming or smuggling of the target result. The framework remains independent of the numerical values reported and is falsifiable against the stated assumptions of weak GW amplitude and linearized gravity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of linearized gravity and quantum field theory in curved spacetime; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Linearized gravity theory for weak gravitational waves
    Invoked for wave propagation in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Canonical quantization of the light field in curved spacetime
    Used to treat photon OAM states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5730 in / 1273 out tokens · 41337 ms · 2026-05-22T19:04:17.812999+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ( 2) can be separated into a spatial part and a temporal part, as well

    and ( 7), one can deduce that the integra- tion in Eq. ( 2) can be separated into a spatial part and a temporal part, as well. The spatial integration will give the spatial part of ψ (xµ ), denoted by ψ x(x). Meanwhile, the temporal integration will give the tem- poral part as ψ t(t) = ∫ dt′gω (t,t ′)ft(t′). These two parts constitute ψ (xµ )—i.e., ψ (xµ ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (14) 3 Therefore, for t>t ′, one can write gω (t,t ′) = 1 2iω (exp[−iω (t − t′)] − exp[iω (t − t′)])

    and ( 12), c1(t′) and c2(t′) can be solved to be c1(t′) = i 2ωe− iωt ′ , (13) c2(t′) = −i 2ωeiωt ′ . (14) 3 Therefore, for t>t ′, one can write gω (t,t ′) = 1 2iω (exp[−iω (t − t′)] − exp[iω (t − t′)]). (15) In total, the function gω (t,t ′) can be expressed as gω (t,t ′) = θ(t − t′) 2iω (exp[−iω (t − t′)] − exp[iω (t − t′)]), (16) whereθ(t − t′) is the H...

    work page

  3. [3]

    and Eq. ( 25), one can find that the perturbation field can be solved by using the Green’s function as ψ (1)(xµ ) = ∫ d4xµ ′ G(xµ,x µ ′ )θ(t′)ψ (0)(xµ ′ ),α ′β ′hα ′β ′ (xµ ′ ) = ∫ d4xµ ′ G(xµ,x µ ′ )θ(t′) ∞∑ l=−∞ ∫ ∞ 0 dp⊥ ∫ ∞ −∞ dp3 × ( gp3p⊥ l(xµ ′ ),α ′β ′ap3p⊥ l +g∗ p3p⊥ l(xµ ′ ),α ′β ′a∗ p3p⊥ l ) × hα ′β ′ (xµ ′ ) = ∞∑ l=−∞ ∫ ∞ 0 dp⊥ ∫ ∞ −∞ dp3 ( ˜gp3...

    work page

  4. [4]

    To provide an analytical solution, we impose the following assumptions: k3 ≫ kg, and k⊥ ≫ kg

    with respect to ρ′ is rather complex. To provide an analytical solution, we impose the following assumptions: k3 ≫ kg, and k⊥ ≫ kg. (32) The two assumptions suggest that the metric varia- tion is negligible within the scales of k− 1 3 and k− 1 ⊥ . Under these assumptions, we have exp( ikgx′ sinθ) =∑∞ n=−∞ inJn(kg sinθρ′) exp(inφ ′) ≈ 1, and we can con- 5 ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    There- fore,Pl′ is nonvanishing only when l′ =l − 2, · · ·, l + 2

    to calculatePl′, one may notice that there are five different Kronecker delta functions, δ(j − m), with m =l − 2, l − 1, l, l + 1, andl + 2. There- fore,Pl′ is nonvanishing only when l′ =l − 2, · · ·, l + 2. This indicates that aside from the original OAM state |l⟩, the photon may occupy one of four additional states |l ± 2⟩ and |l ± 1⟩, each with a probabi...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Hence, Pl± 1 ≫ Pl± 2—i.e., the greater the OAM that photons gain or lose, the more challeng- ing the process becomes. For a typical scenario, e.g., at a propagation distance ofL = 1 × 107 m, with photon wave- length λ = 700 nm, k⊥ = 1 × 106 m− 1, A+ = 1 × 10− 21, A× = 1 × 10− 21, GW frequency fg = 1 Hz, φ 0 = 0, and θ = π/ 3, the probabilities are Pl± 1 ∼...

    work page

  7. [7]

    At first sight, Pl+2 =Pl− 2, and Pl+1 =Pl− 1, suggest- ing that the quantized OAM is exchanged among pho- tons, with GWs merely augmenting this process

    and ( 48). At first sight, Pl+2 =Pl− 2, and Pl+1 =Pl− 1, suggest- ing that the quantized OAM is exchanged among pho- tons, with GWs merely augmenting this process. The po- larization of GWs appears to remain unaltered. However, this is merely a superficial outcome resulting from our inappropriate choice of GW polarization basis. To eluci- 7 date the interac...

    work page

  8. [8]

    As a result, the time-average spin AM of GWs is not changed

    and ( 48), indicate that at a given moment, a photon absorbs AM from GWs with a certain probability, while another photon emits the same AM back to the GWs with the same probabil- ity. As a result, the time-average spin AM of GWs is not changed. Last, we consider the case where the photons are bounced between mirrors for N rounds. The length be- tween the...

    work page

  9. [9]

    The signal photons 9 will interfere with themselves either constructively or de- structively based on their relative phases, resulting in the function f (t)

    This occurs be- cause, within the high-frequency GWs, the original pho- tons experience varying GW phases during their prop- agation in the arm, resulting in their transition to sig- nal photons with different phases. The signal photons 9 will interfere with themselves either constructively or de- structively based on their relative phases, resulting in th...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Moreover, by examining the probability Pl− 1, one can find that N is proportional to |A|2, with A being the GW amplitude

    This fact offers a significant advantage for our detector, as it is insensitive to the arm length L, hence potentially mit- igating some background noise, e.g., seismic noise [ 50]. Moreover, by examining the probability Pl− 1, one can find that N is proportional to |A|2, with A being the GW amplitude. Hence, this detector is more advantageous for determinin...

    work page

  11. [11]

    E. E. Flanagan and S. A. Hughes, The basics of gravita- tional wave theory, New J. Phys. 7, 204 (2005)

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    Caprini and D

    C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Cosmological back- grounds of gravitational waves, Classical and Quantum Gravity 35, 163001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Punturo, M

    M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, B. Allen, N. An- dersson, K. Arun, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Barsuglia, M. Beker, et al., The third generation of gravitational wave observatories and their science reach, Classical and Quantum Gravity 27, 084007 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    W.-T. Ni, Gravitational wave (gw) classification, space gw detection sensitivities and amigo (astrodynamical middle-frequency interferometric gw observatory), in EPJ Web of Conferences , Vol. 168 (EDP Sciences, 2018) p. 01004

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Aber- nathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, et al., Observation of grav- itational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Amaro-Seoane, S

    P. Amaro-Seoane, S. Aoudia, S. Babak, P. Bin´ etruy, E. Berti, A. Boh´ e, C. Caprini, M. Colpi, N. J. Cor- nish, K. Danzmann, J.-F. Dufaux, J. Gair, O. Jennrich, P. Jetzer, A. Klein, R. N. Lang, A. Lobo, T. Litten- berg, S. T. McWilliams, G. Nelemans, A. Petiteau, E. K. Porter, B. F. Schutz, A. Sesana, R. Stebbins, T. Sum- ner, M. Vallisneri, S. Vitale, M...

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Hobbs, A

    G. Hobbs, A. Archibald, Z. Arzoumanian, D. Backer, M. Bailes, N. Bhat, M. Burgay, S. Burke-Spolaor, D. Champion, I. Cognard, et al., The international pul- sar timing array project: using pulsars as a gravita- tional wave detector, Classical and Quantum Gravity 27, 084013 (2010)

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    W. L. K. Wu, J. Errard, C. Dvorkin, C. L. Kuo, A. T. Lee, P. McDonald, A. Slosar, and O. Zahn, A guide to designing future ground-based cosmic microwave back- ground experiments, Astrophys. J. 788, 138 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Allen, M

    L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. Spreeuw, and J. Wo- erdman, Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes, Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185 (1992)

    work page 1992

  20. [20]

    G. F. Calvo, A. Pic´ on, and E. Bagan, Quantum field theory of photons with orbital angular momentum, Phys. Rev. A 73, 013805 (2006)

    work page 2006

  21. [21]

    A. Mair, A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Entangle - ment of the orbital angular momentum states of photons, Nature 412, 313 (2001)

    work page 2001

  22. [22]

    Molina-Terriza, J

    G. Molina-Terriza, J. P. Torres, and L. Torner, Manage- ment of the angular momentum of light: preparation of photons in multidimensional vector states of angular mo- 11 mentum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 013601 (2001)

    work page 2001

  23. [23]

    Leach, M

    J. Leach, M. J. Padgett, S. M. Barnett, S. Franke-Arnold , and J. Courtial, Measuring the orbital angular momen- tum of a single photon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 257901 (2002)

    work page 2002

  24. [24]

    Vaziri, G

    A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Experimental two-photon, three-dimensional entanglement for quan- tum communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 240401 (2002)

    work page 2002

  25. [25]

    Vaziri, J.-W

    A. Vaziri, J.-W. Pan, T. Jennewein, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Concentration of higher dimensional entan- glement: qutrits of photon orbital angular momentum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 227902 (2003)

    work page 2003

  26. [26]

    Allen, M

    L. Allen, M. Padgett, and M. Babiker, Iv the orbital an- gular momentum of light, Prog. Opt. 39, 291 (1999)

    work page 1999

  27. [27]

    Y. S. Kivshar and E. A. Ostrovskaya, Optical vortices folding and twisting waves of light, Optics and photonics news 12, 24 (2001)

    work page 2001

  28. [28]

    Molina-Terriza, J

    G. Molina-Terriza, J. P. Torres, and L. Torner, Twisted photons, Nature Phys. 3, 305 (2007)

    work page 2007

  29. [29]

    A. M. Yao and M. J. Padgett, Orbital angular momen- tum: origins, behavior and applications, Adv. Opt. Pho- tonics 3, 161 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    Molina-Terriza, E

    G. Molina-Terriza, E. M. Wright, and L. Torner, Propa- gation and control of noncanonical optical vortices, Opt. Lett. 26, 163 (2001)

    work page 2001

  31. [31]

    Harwit, Photon orbital angular momentum in astro- physics, Astrophys

    M. Harwit, Photon orbital angular momentum in astro- physics, Astrophys. J. 597, 1266 (2003)

    work page 2003

  32. [32]

    Tamburini, B

    F. Tamburini, B. Thid´ e, G. Molina-Terriza, and G. An- zolin, Twisting of light around rotating black holes, Na- ture Phys. 7, 195 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Tamburini, B

    F. Tamburini, B. Thid´ e, and M. Della Valle, Measure- ment of the spin of the m87 black hole from its observed twisted light, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 492, L22 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Hetharia, M

    D. Hetharia, M. P. van Exter, and W. L¨ offler, Spatial coherence and the orbital angular momentum of light in astronomy, Phys. Rev. A 90, 063801 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Bialynicki-Birula and Z

    I. Bialynicki-Birula and Z. Bialynicka-Birula, Gravi ta- tional waves carrying orbital angular momentum, New J. Phys. 18, 023022 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Baral, A

    P. Baral, A. Ray, R. Koley, and P. Majumdar, Gravita- tional waves with orbital angular momentum, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Bialynicki-Birula and S

    I. Bialynicki-Birula and S. Charzy´ nski, Trapping and guiding bodies by gravitational waves endowed with an- gular momentum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 171101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Chelkowski, S

    S. Chelkowski, S. Hild, and A. Freise, Prospects of high er- order laguerre-gauss modes in future gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 79, 122002 (2009)

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Granata, C

    M. Granata, C. Buy, R. Ward, and M. Barsuglia, Higher- order laguerre-gauss mode generation and interferometry for gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 231102 (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Q. Wu, W. Zhu, and L. Feng, Testing the wave-particle duality of gravitational wave using the spin-orbital-hall effect of structured light, Universe 8, 535 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    H. Wu, X. Fan, and L. Chen, How gravitational fluctua- tions degrade the high-dimensional spatial entanglement, Phys. Rev. D 106, 045023 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    D. G. Duffy, Green’s functions with applications (Chap- man and Hall/CRC, 2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    D. W. Lozier, Nist digital library of mathematical func - tions, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 38, 105 (2003)

    work page 2003

  44. [44]

    F. W. Olver, NIST handbook of mathematical functions hardback and (Cambridge university press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    M. E. Peskin, An introduction to quantum field theory (CRC press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Exirifard, E

    Q. Exirifard, E. Culf, and E. Karimi, Towards communi- cation in a curved spacetime geometry, Commun. Phys. 4, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Chakraborty and P

    T. Chakraborty and P. Majumdar, Particle creation in a linear gravitational wave background, Phys. Rev. D 110, L021701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Morales and A

    S. Morales and A. Dasgupta, Scalar and fermion field in- teractions with a gravitational wave, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity 37, 105001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Macmillan, 1973)

    work page 1973

  50. [50]

    D. L. Andrews, Symmetry and quantum features in op- tical vortices, Symmetry 13, 1368 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern quantum mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    S. M. Carroll, Spacetime and geometry (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2019)

    work page 2019

  53. [53]

    S. N. Khonina, N. L. Kazanskiy, S. V. Karpeev, and M. A. Butt, Bessel beam: Significance and appli- cations—a progressive review, Micromachines 11, 997 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum fields in curved space (Cambridge univer- sity press, 1984)

    work page 1984

  55. [55]

    Takagi, Vacuum noise and stress induced by uniform accelerationhawking-unruh effect in rindler manifold of arbitrary dimension, Prog

    S. Takagi, Vacuum noise and stress induced by uniform accelerationhawking-unruh effect in rindler manifold of arbitrary dimension, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 88, 1 (1986)

    work page 1986

  56. [56]

    S. R. Allam, A conceptual review on bessel beams, Phys. Scr. 1402-4896/ad4921 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Y. Shen, X. Wang, Z. Xie, C. Min, X. Fu, Q. Liu, M. Gong, and X. Yuan, Optical vortices 30 years on: Oam manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities, Light Sci. Appl. 8, 90 (2019)

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    Vallone, On the properties of circular beams: normal - ization, laguerre–gauss expansion, and free-space diver- gence, Opt

    G. Vallone, On the properties of circular beams: normal - ization, laguerre–gauss expansion, and free-space diver- gence, Opt. Lett. 40, 1717 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    Horkovich, P

    J. Horkovich, P. Pomphrey, Jr, J. Horkovich, and P. Pomphrey, Jr, Recent advances in al- pha high power chemical laser program, in 28th Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference (1997) p. 2409

    work page 1997

  60. [60]

    Pitkin, S

    M. Pitkin, S. Reid, S. Rowan, and J. Hough, Gravi- tational wave detection by interferometry (ground and space), Living Rev. Relativity 14, 1 (2011)

    work page 2011

  61. [61]

    H. Ding, Z. Tong, C. Zheng, T. Meng, W. Wei, L. Zhu, Y. Wang, D. Lu, Y. Zhao, H. Yu, et al., 100 w orbital angular momentum laser at 2 µ m, Opt. Lett. 50, 1661 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    H. Chen, Q. Wang, X. Liu, H. Liu, X. Guo, T. Yang, L. Yan, and J. Zhang, 100-w yb: Yag thin-disk vortex laser oscillator, Light: Adv. Manuf. 4, 476 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    F. S. Roux, Infinitesimal-propagation equation for de- coherence of an orbital-angular-momentum-entangled biphoton state in atmospheric turbulence, Phys. Rev. A 83, 053822 (2011)

    work page 2011

  64. [64]

    F. S. Roux, T. Wellens, and V. N. Shatokhin, Entangle- ment evolution of twisted photons in strong atmospheric turbulence, Phys. Rev. A 92, 012326 (2015) . 12

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    Paterson, Atmospheric turbulence and orbital angul ar momentum of single photons for optical communication, Phys

    C. Paterson, Atmospheric turbulence and orbital angul ar momentum of single photons for optical communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 153901 (2005)

    work page 2005

  66. [66]

    F. S. Roux, The decay of orbital angular momentum en- tanglement in atmospheric turbulence, Abdus Salam In- ternational Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Ital y , 8 (2013)

    work page 2013

  67. [67]

    Rodenburg, M

    B. Rodenburg, M. P. Lavery, M. Malik, M. N. O’Sullivan, M. Mirhosseini, D. J. Robertson, M. Padgett, and R. W. Boyd, Influence of atmospheric turbulence on states of light carrying orbital angular momentum, Opt. Lett. 37, 3735 (2012)

    work page 2012

  68. [68]

    Peplow, Twisted light sends mozart image over record distance, Nature News 10.1038/nature.2014.16328 (2014)

    M. Peplow, Twisted light sends mozart image over record distance, Nature News 10.1038/nature.2014.16328 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature.2014.16328 2014

  69. [69]

    Krenn, R

    M. Krenn, R. Fickler, M. Fink, J. Handsteiner, M. Ma- lik, T. Scheidl, R. Ursin, and A. Zeilinger, Communica- tion with spatially modulated light through turbulent air across vienna, New J. Phys. 16, 113028 (2014)

    work page 2014

  70. [70]

    H. Zhao, Y. Ma, Z. Gao, N. Liu, T. Wu, S. Wu, X. Feng, J. Hone, S. Strauf, and L. Feng, High-purity generation and switching of twisted single photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 183801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    Zhang, J

    Z. Zhang, J. Gan, X. Heng, Y. Wu, Q. Li, Q. Qian, D. Chen, and Z. Yang, Optical fiber design with orbital angular momentum light purity higher than 99.9%, Opt. Express 23, 29331 (2015)

    work page 2015

  72. [72]

    Sontag, M

    A. Sontag, M. A. Noyan, and J. M. Kikkawa, High pu- rity orbital angular momentum of light, Opt. Express 30, 43513 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    Y. Liu, Y. Wang, W. Geng, W. Zhao, Z. Pan, and Y. Yue, Enhanced oam mode purity in ring- core optical fiber with graded-index profile, in Optica Advanced Photonics Congress 2022 (Optica Publishing Group, 2022) p. SoW4F.2

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Huang, X

    Y. Huang, X. Li, Q. Li, Z. Qi, H. Zhu, Z. Akram, and X. Jiang, Generation of broadband high-purity dual- mode oam beams using a four-feed patch antenna: theory and implementation, Sci. Rep. 9, 12977 (2019)

    work page 2019

  75. [75]

    H. Feng, J. Fu, K. Zhang, and S. N. Burokur, Wide- band high-purity dual-mode circularly polarized vortex antenna for oam multiplexing, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 58, 225002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Kaviani, R

    H. Kaviani, R. Ghobadi, B. Behera, M. Wu, A. Hryciw, S. Vo, D. Fattal, and P. Barclay, Optomechanical detec- tion of light with orbital angular momentum, Opt. Ex- press 28, 15482 (2020)

    work page 2020

  77. [77]

    Whittle, L

    C. Whittle, L. McCuller, V. Sudhir, and M. Evans, Uni- fication of thermal and quantum noises in gravitational- wave detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 241401 (2023)

    work page 2023