Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey of Task-Oriented Knowledge Graph Reasoning: Status, Applications, and Prospects

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.11012 v1 pith:GPGZBLF2 submitted 2025-04-27 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords reasoningknowledgetasksapplicationsexistingadvancedaimsapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge graphs (KGs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for structuring and leveraging diverse real-world knowledge, which serve as a fundamental technology for enabling cognitive intelligence systems with advanced understanding and reasoning capabilities. Knowledge graph reasoning (KGR) aims to infer new knowledge based on existing facts in KGs, playing a crucial role in applications such as public security intelligence, intelligent healthcare, and financial risk assessment. From a task-centric perspective, existing KGR approaches can be broadly classified into static single-step KGR, static multi-step KGR, dynamic KGR, multi-modal KGR, few-shot KGR, and inductive KGR. While existing surveys have covered these six types of KGR tasks, a comprehensive review that systematically summarizes all KGR tasks particularly including downstream applications and more challenging reasoning paradigms remains lacking. In contrast to previous works, this survey provides a more comprehensive perspective on the research of KGR by categorizing approaches based on primary reasoning tasks, downstream application tasks, and potential challenging reasoning tasks. Besides, we explore advanced techniques, such as large language models (LLMs), and their impact on KGR. This work aims to highlight key research trends and outline promising future directions in the field of KGR.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RADD: Retrieval-Augmented Discrete Diffusion for Multi-Modal Knowledge Graph Completion

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    RADD decouples retrieval and reranking in multi-modal KGC via a relation-aware KGE retriever and conditional discrete denoiser, reporting state-of-the-art results on three benchmarks.

Pith tools