pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.04876 · v3 · submitted 2025-07-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Universal Criterion and Graph-Theoretic Construction of Intrinsic Superconducting Diode Effect

Ran Wang , Ning Hao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 06:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords intrinsic superconducting diode effectbare Hamiltoniantime-reversal symmetryinversion symmetryfinite-momentum pairinggraph-theoretic constructionnonreciprocal critical currentuniversal diagnostic criterion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two inequalities checked on the bare Hamiltonian diagnose whether a superconductor will show an intrinsic diode effect.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper challenges the idea that breaking both time-reversal symmetry and inversion symmetry is enough to produce an intrinsic superconducting diode effect, where supercurrent flows more easily in one direction than the other inside a single material. It instead offers a universal test consisting of two inequalities that can be evaluated directly from the system's Hamiltonian without extra details about pairing or disorder. A sympathetic reader would care because this test gives a concrete way to identify or design materials that support finite-momentum Cooper pairing and nonreciprocal critical currents. The same framework also supplies a graph-theoretic method for building models that meet the criterion. If the test holds, it separates cases where symmetry breaking produces the diode effect from cases where it does not.

Core claim

The long-standing assumption that intrinsic SDE requires simultaneous breaking of time-reversal and inversion symmetries is necessary but not sufficient. A universal diagnostic criterion consisting of two inequalities evaluated on the bare Hamiltonian alone determines the presence of intrinsic SDE, and this criterion yields a graph-theoretic construction for generating nonreciprocal models that extends beyond superconductivity.

What carries the argument

Two inequalities evaluated directly from the bare Hamiltonian that diagnose the conditions for nonreciprocal critical currents arising from finite-momentum Cooper pairing.

If this is right

  • Any Hamiltonian satisfying the two inequalities will produce nonreciprocal supercurrents inside a monolithic superconductor.
  • The criterion works for arbitrary pairing symmetries encoded in the Hamiltonian and does not require additional interaction terms.
  • Graph-theoretic rules derived from the inequalities supply a systematic way to construct new nonreciprocal superconducting models.
  • The same diagnostic extends to other nonreciprocal transport phenomena that can be read from a bare Hamiltonian.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Materials or lattice models can now be screened computationally by checking the two inequalities before any supercurrent calculation.
  • The graph construction may generate candidate Hamiltonians for experimental realization in heterostructures or engineered lattices.
  • Similar inequality-based tests could be explored for diode effects in other ordered phases such as magnetism or charge-density waves.

Load-bearing premise

Evaluating the two inequalities on the bare Hamiltonian by itself is enough to confirm intrinsic SDE without needing separate assumptions about pairing symmetry, disorder, or interaction strength.

What would settle it

Compute the direction-dependent critical currents for a concrete Hamiltonian that satisfies the two inequalities; if the currents turn out to be reciprocal, the proposed criterion does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.04876 by Ning Hao, Ran Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of SDE in the helical superconductors. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic for multi bands. (a) Two different Fermi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The intrinsic superconducting diode effect (SDE) is distinguished from the Josephson diode effect (JDE) by its manifestation of nonreciprocal critical current phenomena within a monolithic superconductor, typically linked to finite-momentum Cooper pairing. The long-standing assumption that SDE requires co-breaking of time-reversal and inversion symmetries proves to be necessary but not sufficient. In this work, we propose a universal diagnostic criterion for intrinsic SDE, expressed as two inequalities evaluated directly from the bare Hamiltonian. This criterion further reveals a graph-theoretic construction for nonreciprocal models, offering design principles that extend beyond superconductivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a universal diagnostic criterion for the intrinsic superconducting diode effect (SDE) consisting of two inequalities that can be evaluated directly on the bare (normal-state) Hamiltonian. It argues that simultaneous breaking of time-reversal and inversion symmetry is necessary but not sufficient for intrinsic SDE, and introduces a graph-theoretic construction that generates nonreciprocal models satisfying the criterion, with implications for finite-momentum pairing and nonreciprocal critical currents.

Significance. If the proposed inequalities are shown to be both necessary and sufficient for intrinsic SDE, the work would supply a practical, Hamiltonian-level design rule that bypasses the need to solve the full self-consistent gap equation for every candidate model. The graph-theoretic construction could also provide a systematic route to engineering nonreciprocity in other condensed-matter contexts.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (12)] §3.2 and Eq. (12): the manuscript asserts that satisfaction of the two inequalities on the bare Hamiltonian directly implies finite-momentum pairing and a nonreciprocal critical current once superconductivity is induced, yet the mapping through the gap equation or pairing kernel is not derived. An explicit example in which the inequalities hold but the self-consistent superconducting state restores reciprocity would falsify the sufficiency claim.
  2. [§4.1] §4.1: the graph-theoretic construction is presented as guaranteeing the inequalities, but it is unclear whether the construction introduces additional constraints on the pairing symmetry or interaction strength that are not encoded in the bare Hamiltonian; this must be clarified to establish that the criterion remains universal.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the criterion but does not indicate the precise form of the two inequalities; a compact statement of both inequalities should appear in the abstract or introduction.
  2. [§2 and §3] Notation for the normal-state Hamiltonian and the operators appearing in the inequalities should be unified between §2 and §3 to avoid reader confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2, Eq. (12)] §3.2 and Eq. (12): the manuscript asserts that satisfaction of the two inequalities on the bare Hamiltonian directly implies finite-momentum pairing and a nonreciprocal critical current once superconductivity is induced, yet the mapping through the gap equation or pairing kernel is not derived. An explicit example in which the inequalities hold but the self-consistent superconducting state restores reciprocity would falsify the sufficiency claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not contain an explicit general derivation mapping the two inequalities through the gap equation or pairing kernel to finite-momentum pairing and nonreciprocal critical currents. The sufficiency is supported by explicit model calculations in which the inequalities correctly predict the emergence of the intrinsic SDE, but a formal proof of the mapping is absent. We will add a derivation in a revised §3.2 showing how the inequalities on the bare Hamiltonian constrain the pairing kernel such that reciprocity cannot be restored in the self-consistent superconducting state under standard weak-coupling assumptions. We have not found a counterexample satisfying the inequalities in which reciprocity is restored, but we will include a brief discussion of the conditions under which the sufficiency holds to address this concern. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1] §4.1: the graph-theoretic construction is presented as guaranteeing the inequalities, but it is unclear whether the construction introduces additional constraints on the pairing symmetry or interaction strength that are not encoded in the bare Hamiltonian; this must be clarified to establish that the criterion remains universal.

    Authors: The graph-theoretic construction operates exclusively on the normal-state (bare) Hamiltonian to enforce the two inequalities via graph asymmetry properties; it does not encode or impose any constraints on the superconducting pairing symmetry or the magnitude of the attractive interaction. These superconducting parameters remain free choices provided they induce a pairing instability. We will revise the presentation in §4.1 to state this independence explicitly, thereby confirming that the criterion and construction remain universal with respect to the details of the superconducting state. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation of bare-Hamiltonian inequalities for intrinsic SDE

full rationale

The paper derives a universal diagnostic criterion as two inequalities evaluated directly on the bare (normal-state) Hamiltonian and presents a graph-theoretic construction for nonreciprocal models. No step reduces the target SDE or finite-momentum pairing to a fitted parameter defined by the effect itself, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation whose content is unverified or to an ansatz smuggled from prior work. The mapping from normal-state spectrum to superconducting nonreciprocity is asserted via the proposed inequalities rather than by construction from the output quantity, and the derivation remains self-contained against the stated assumptions without renaming known empirical patterns or importing uniqueness theorems from the same authors. This is the most common honest outcome for a criterion paper that begins from the Hamiltonian.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract alone, the paper introduces no explicit free parameters or new invented entities; it relies on standard assumptions of superconducting theory such as the existence of a bare Hamiltonian description and the validity of finite-momentum pairing concepts.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The bare Hamiltonian fully encodes the information needed to diagnose intrinsic SDE via the proposed inequalities.
    Invoked when the criterion is stated to be evaluated directly from the bare Hamiltonian without further microscopic details.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5621 in / 1201 out tokens · 29116 ms · 2026-05-19T06:38:13.511595+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Diode effect in microwave irradiated Josephson junctions with Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Microwave irradiation induces a phase-independent current term that produces tunable asymmetric critical currents in Josephson junctions with Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states once particle-hole and inversion symmetries are broken.

  2. Response tensor for the superconducting (Josephson) diode effect

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A response tensor is introduced to characterize the superconducting diode effect, taking antisymmetric form under Rashba SOC with C3v/C4v/C6v symmetries and acquiring symmetric parts under nematicity as a potential de...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Jiang and J

    K. Jiang and J. Hu, Superconducting diode effects, Na- ture Physics 18, 1145 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Nadeem, M

    M. Nadeem, M. S. Fuhrer, and X. Wang, The super- conducting diode effect, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 558 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y. Yanase, Nonreciprocal transport and optical phenomena in quantum materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 15, 63 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    J. Hu, C. Wu, and X. Dai, Proposed design of a josephson diode, Phys Rev Lett 99, 067004 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Wakatsuki and N

    R. Wakatsuki and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal current in noncentrosymmetric rashba superconductors, Physical Review Letters 121, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.026601 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.026601 2018

  6. [6]

    F. Ando, Y. Miyasaka, T. Li, J. Ishizuka, T. Arakawa, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, Y. Yanase, and T. Ono, Obser- vation of superconducting diode effect, Nature 584, 373 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [8]

    Baumgartner, L

    C. Baumgartner, L. Fuchs, A. Costa, S. Reinhardt, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, P. E. Faria Junior, D. Kochan, J. Fabian, N. Paradiso, and C. Strunk, Supercurrent rectification and magne- tochiral effects in symmetric josephson junctions, Nature Nanotechnology 17, 39 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [9]

    Daido, Y

    A. Daido, Y. Ikeda, and Y. Yanase, Intrinsic supercon- ducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 037001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [10]

    N. F. Q. Yuan and L. Fu, Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors, Proc Natl Acad Sci U 6 S A 119, e2119548119 (2022), yuan, Noah F Q Fu, Liang eng 2022/04/05 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 12;119(15):e2119548119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2119548119. Epub 2022 Apr 4

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2119548119 2022

  10. [11]

    J. J. He, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, A phenomenological theory of superconductor diodes, New Journal of Physics 24, 10.1088/1367-2630/ac6766 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac6766 2022

  11. [13]

    W., et al., 2019, Science, DOI: 10.1126/sci- ence.aaw5903 Barsdell et al., 2010, MNRAS, 408,

    M. Davydova, S. Prembabu, and L. Fu, Universal josephson diode effect, Science Advances 8, 10.1126/sci- adv.abo0309 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1126/sci- 2022

  12. [14]

    H. F. Legg, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Superconducting diode effect due to magnetochiral anisotropy in topolog- ical insulators and rashba nanowires, Physical Review B 106, 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.104501 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.104501 2022

  13. [15]

    Bauriedl, C

    L. Bauriedl, C. Bauml, L. Fuchs, C. Baumgartner, N. Paulik, J. M. Bauer, K. Q. Lin, J. M. Lupton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, C. Strunk, and N. Paradiso, Supercurrent diode effect and magnetochiral anisotropy in few-layer nbse2, Nat Commun 13, 4266 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [16]

    J.-X. Lin, P. Siriviboon, H. D. Scammell, S. Liu, D. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, M. S. Scheurer, and J. I. A. Li, Zero-field superconducting diode effect in small-twist-angle trilayer graphene, Na- ture Physics 18, 1221 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [17]

    Tanaka, B

    Y. Tanaka, B. Lu, and N. Nagaosa, Theory of giant diode effect in d -wave superconductor junctions on the sur- face of a topological insulator, Physical Review B 106, 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.214524 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.214524 2022

  16. [18]

    H. D. Scammell, J. I. A. Li, and M. S. Scheurer, Theory of zero-field superconducting diode effect in twisted trilayer graphene, 2D Materials 9, 025027 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [19]

    R. S. Souto, M. Leijnse, and C. Schrade, Josephson diode effect in supercurrent interferometers, Physical Review Letters 129, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.267702 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.267702 2022

  18. [20]

    B. Pal, A. Chakraborty, P. K. Sivakumar, M. Davydova, A. K. Gopi, A. K. Pandeya, J. A. Krieger, Y. Zhang, M. Date, S. Ju, N. Yuan, N. B. M. Schr¨ oter, L. Fu, and S. S. P. Parkin, Josephson diode effect from cooper pair momentum in a topological semimetal, Nature Physics 18, 1228 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [21]

    B. Zhai, B. Li, Y. Wen, F. Wu, and J. He, Prediction of ferroelectric superconductors with reversible supercon- ducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B 106, L140505 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [22]

    Ili´ c and F

    S. Ili´ c and F. S. Bergeret, Theory of the supercurrent diode effect in rashba superconductors with arbitrary dis- order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 177001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [23]

    Chazono, S

    M. Chazono, S. Kanasugi, T. Kitamura, and Y. Yanase, Piezoelectric effect and diode effect in anapole and monopole superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 107, 214512 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [24]

    Xie and K

    Y.-M. Xie and K. T. Law, Orbital fulde-ferrell pairing state in moir´ e ising superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 016001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [26]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Altermagnetic supercon- ducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [27]

    K. Chen, B. Karki, and P. Hosur, Intrinsic supercon- ducting diode effects in tilted weyl and dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 109, 064511 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [28]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Enhanced superconduct- ing diode effect due to coexisting phases, Physical Review Letters 132, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.046003 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.046003 2024

  26. [29]

    T. Le, Z. Pan, Z. Xu, J. Liu, J. Wang, Z. Lou, X. Yang, Z. Wang, Y. Yao, C. Wu, and X. Lin, Superconducting diode effect and interference patterns in kagome csv3sb5, Nature 630, 64 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [30]

    F. Liu, Y. M. Itahashi, S. Aoki, Y. Dong, Z. Wang, N. Ogawa, T. Ideue, and Y. Iwasa, Superconducting diode effect under time-reversal symmetry, Science Ad- vances 10, 10.1126/sciadv.ado1502 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.ado1502 2024

  28. [31]

    J. Wang, Y. Jiang, J. J. Wang, and J.-F. Liu, Efficient josephson diode effect on a two-dimensional topological insulator with asymmetric magnetization, Physical Re- view B 109, 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.075412 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.075412 2024

  29. [32]

    Manca, S

    Q. Cheng, Y. Mao, and Q.-F. Sun, Field-free josephson diode effect in altermagnet/normal metal/altermagnet junctions, Physical Review B 110, 10.1103/Phys- RevB.110.014518 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2024

  30. [33]

    Cayao, N

    J. Cayao, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tanaka, Enhancing the josephson diode effect with majorana bound states, Physical Review B 109, 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L081405 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.l081405 2024

  31. [34]

    Bankier, L

    I. Bankier, L. Attias, A. Levchenko, and M. Khodas, Superconducting diode effect in ising superconductors, Physical Review B 111, 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L180505 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.l180505 2025

  32. [35]

    J.-X. Hu, S. A. Chen, and K. T. Law, Geometric and conventional contributions of superconducting diode ef- fect: Application to flat-band systems, Phys. Rev. B111, 174513 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [36]

    E. I. Rashba, Properties of semiconductors with an ex- tremum loop .1. cyclotron and combinational resonance in a magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of the loop, Sov. Phys. Solid. State 2, 1109 (1960)

    work page 1960

  34. [37]

    Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Properties of a 2d electron-gas with lifted spectral degeneracy, Jetp Letters 39, 78 (1984)

    work page 1984

  35. [38]

    Winkler, Rashba spin splitting in two-dimensional electron and hole systems, Phys

    R. Winkler, Rashba spin splitting in two-dimensional electron and hole systems, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4245 (2000)

    work page 2000

  36. [39]

    Fulde and R

    P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field, Phys. Rev. 135, A550 (1964)

    work page 1964

  37. [40]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonuniform state of superconductors, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1136 (1964) [Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 762 (1965)] (1964)

    work page 1964

  38. [41]

    V. M. Edelstein, The ginzburg - landau equation for su- perconductors of polar symmetry, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 8, 339 (1996)

    work page 1996

  39. [42]

    Hasan, D

    J. Hasan, D. Shaffer, M. Khodas, and A. Levchenko, Su- percurrent diode effect in helical superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024508 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [43]

    Supplemental material

    work page

  41. [44]

    G. E. V. Gor’kov and L. P., An unusual superconductiv- ity in ube13, JETP (1984)

    work page 1984

  42. [45]

    G. E. V. Gor’kov and L. P., Superconducting classes in heavy-fermion systems, Soviet Physics JETP (1985)

    work page 1985

  43. [46]

    Sigrist and K

    M. Sigrist and K. Ueda, Phenomenological theory of unconventional superconductivity, Reviews of Modern Physics 63, 239 (1991)

    work page 1991

  44. [47]

    W.-H. Kang, M. Barth, A. Costa, A. Garcia-Ruiz, A. Mre´ nca-Kolasi´ nska, M.-H. Liu, and D. Kochan, Mag- netotransport and spin-relaxation signatures of the radial 7 rashba and dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling in proximi- tized graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [48]

    We need nζζ ′ = 2 to generate the product matrices: 1, κz 1, κz 2, κz 3, κz 1κz 2, κz 1κz 3, κz 2κz 3 and κz 1κz 2κz 3

    For example, a model with multi-DOF has a part cat- egorized to symmetry {T ζ, Iζ ′} explicitly written as H T ζ,Iζ ′ = f0(k)1 + f1(k)κz 1 + f2(k)κz 2 + f3(k)κz 3, where κz 1, κz 2 and κz 3 are pauli matrices for different DOF. We need nζζ ′ = 2 to generate the product matrices: 1, κz 1, κz 2, κz 3, κz 1κz 2, κz 1κz 3, κz 2κz 3 and κz 1κz 2κz 3

    work page

  46. [49]

    Huang, Y

    X. Huang, Y. Xiao, R. Song, and N. Hao, Generic model with unconventional rashba bands and giant spin galvanic effect, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195419 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [50]

    R. Wang, J. Li, X. Huang, L. Wang, R. Song, and N. Hao, Superconductivity in two-dimensional systems with un- conventional rashba bands, Phys. Rev. B 110, 134517 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [51]

    Yerin, S.-L

    Y. Yerin, S.-L. Drechsler, M. Cuoco, and C. Petrillo, Multiple-q current states in a multicomponent supercon- ducting channel, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 35, 505601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [52]

    N. S. Ticea, S. Raghu, and Y.-M. Wu, Pair density wave order in multiband systems, Phys. Rev. B 110, 094515 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [53]

    Wang, S.-B

    R. Wang, S.-B. Zhang, and N. Hao, Finite-momentum pairing state in unconventional rashba systems, Phys. Rev. B 111, L100506 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [54]

    Putzer and M

    B. Putzer and M. S. Scheurer, Eliashberg theory and su- perfluid stiffness of band-off-diagonal pairing in twisted graphene, Phys. Rev. B 111, 144513 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [55]

    Ji and N

    H. Ji and N. F. Q. Yuan, Multiband superconductors under magnetic fields: Fractional vortices and ising su- perconductivity, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L012010 (2025). In this supplemental material, we explain the symmetry αδq+q0 = α−δq+q0 in Sec. S1. We use the valleytronic model for an example to demonstrate the superconducting diode effect (SDE) criterion in S...

    work page 2025

  53. [56]

    1 − ˆk · q 2k ! ˆk + q 2k # × σ ) · ˆz, (S35) GT 0 −k + q 2 , −iωn = h++σ0 + h+− (

    − ψ(0)( 1 2 + i x 2πkB T ) i , where ψ(0)(z) is the di-gamma function, is expanded to series in even orders of x. Setting q = δq + q0 with q0 = −2(λkF /vF )ˆx, Eq. (S5) is transformed into a function with only even orders of δq, which leads to αδq+q0 = α−δq+q0. Clearly, this symmetry just come from the linear formalism of the term λkx, which only shift th...

    work page