Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 94 references

Quantum i.i.d. Steady States in Open Many-Body Systems

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For a broad class of open quantum many-body systems, a product of identical local states is a steady state exactly when four local conditions hold, and a large family of models becomes exactly solvable.

desk verdict Genuinely new equivalent condition for product steady states, with a real flaw: the abstract's no-go claim drops the uniqueness assumption, and without it the claim is false. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10319 v2 pith:XF2Y63UX submitted 2025-07-14 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP

Takanao Ishii , Masahito Ueda This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP MSC 81S2281R05
keywords openquantumsystemsGKSLmasterequationLindbladdynamicssteadystatesi.i.d.permutationsymmetrySchur-Weyldualityno-gotheorem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks when a many-body system exposed to local driving and dissipation settles into the simplest possible steady state: the same single-site density matrix repeated on every site, a quantum i.i.d. state. For finite-dimensional local Hilbert spaces, dynamics governed by the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad master equation, one-site jump operators, and at most two-body Hamiltonians, it proves that $L(\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\otimes n})=0$ holds if and only if four conditions are met. It then identifies a commuting algebra $\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{com}}$ (spanned by permutation operators, plus number operators under superselection) and shows that any Hamiltonian built from $\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{com}}$ plus uniform local terms has a quantum i.i.d. steady state, independent of lattice geometry and interaction strengths. These results turn the search for such steady states into a local calculation and, under a uniqueness assumption, rule out spatial correlations and entanglement in the steady state.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is $\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{com}}$, the set of operators on the $n$-site Hilbert space that commute with every quantum i.i.d. state; Schur-Weyl duality identifies $\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{com}}$ with the algebra generated by permutation operators (and site number operators under the number-superselection rule). Such operators act trivially on the i.i.d. structure, so when the Hamiltonian lies in $\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{com}}$ plus uniform local terms, the steady state is determined entirely by the single-site Lindblad superoperator. The proof of Theorem 1 also rests on decomposing the Hamiltonian into irreducible one- and two-body pieces and projecting the Lindbladian onto $\mathrm{Im}(\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\otimes n})$, which reduces a global kernel condition to local commutation relations.

What would settle it

Solve $L(\hat{\rho})=0$ exactly for a three-site spin-1/2 system with uniform local dissipation and a two-body Hamiltonian piece whose projected commutator with $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}\otimes\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}$ is nonzero; if $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\otimes 3}$ lies in the kernel anyway, the equivalence in Theorem 1 is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is an if-and-only-if characterization. For a system with finite local dimension $d$, GKSL dynamics, 1-local Lindblad operators, and an at-most-two-body Hamiltonian, $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\otimes n}$ is annihilated by the Lindbladian exactly when: (i) every Lindblad operator leaves $\mathrm{Im}(\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}})$ invariant; (ii) the effective Hamiltonian leaves $\mathrm{Im}(\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\otimes n})$ invariant; (iii) $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}$ is a steady state of the projected single-site Lindbladian; and (iv) every projected irreducible two-body term commutes with $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}\otimes\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}$. For full-rank $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}$ this reduces to the simpler pair of conditions that the local state is a single-site steady state and each two-body Hamiltonian piece commutes with $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}\otimes\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}$. The paper further proves that the operators commuting with all i.i.d. states are exactly the span of the permutation operators (together with number operators under the number-superselection rule), so any Hamiltonian made from them plus uniform local terms is guaranteed to have a quantum i.i.d. steady state found by solving a single-site Lindblad equation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise, stated in Section II A, is that every Lindblad operator acts on a single site and that the local Hilbert space is finite-dimensional; the no-go corollaries further assume that the steady state is unique.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every model in the Theorem 5 class has an exactly solvable steady state $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\otimes n}$, where $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{loc}}$ solves a one-site Lindblad equation; the solution does not depend on interaction couplings, lattice geometry, or dimension.
  • If the steady state is unique, that steady state has zero spatial correlations and zero entanglement for any choice of physical observables, as stated in Corollary 6.
  • Adding the condition that the Lindbladian has no purely imaginary eigenvalues makes all spatial correlations and entanglement decay exponentially in time, as stated in Corollary 7.
  • When the two-body Hamiltonian pieces lie in $\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{com}}$ and the single-site Lindblad superoperator is uniform, the i.i.d. form is dynamically stable, and time-correlation and response functions have closed analytic forms, as shown in Theorems 8 and 9.
  • The criteria apply across spin, fermionic, and hard-core boson models, including dissipative Heisenberg, spinless fermion, t-J, Hubbard, and hard-core boson examples.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same machinery suggests a classification of dissipative phase transitions—within the Theorem 5 class, any transition must come from non-uniqueness of the single-site steady state or from leaving the $\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{com}}$-plus-uniform-local Hamiltonian class, since the i.i.d. steady state is otherwise interaction-independent.
  • Beyond the paper: dropping the 1-locality assumption is the most direct place to look for counterexamples and for entangled steady states; a two-site jump operator version of Theorem 1 would be a natural testbed.
  • Beyond the paper: because $\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{com}}$ is the permutation algebra, spin chains with permutation-type interactions and local dissipation form a ready-made family for benchmarking quantum simulators and for engineering uniform states in arbitrary geometries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies when an open quantum many-body system governed by a GKSL master equation possesses a steady state of the quantum i.i.d. form ρ_loc^{⊗n}. The stated assumptions are a finite-dimensional local Hilbert space, 1-local Lindblad operators, and a Hamiltonian consisting of at most two-body terms. Theorem 1 gives four local conditions that are equivalent to L(ρ_loc^{⊗n})=0; Lemma 2 gives a simplified equivalence for full-rank ρ_loc; Lemma 4 characterizes, via Schur-Weyl duality, the set B_com of operators commuting with all quantum i.i.d. states; Theorem 5 gives a sufficient condition for existence of a quantum i.i.d. steady state; Theorem 8 characterizes dynamical stability of the i.i.d. form; and Theorem 9 gives closed-form expressions for time-correlation functions. Corollaries 6 and 7 state, under additional uniqueness and spectral assumptions, that steady states have no spatial correlations or entanglement and that these properties decay exponentially. Several spin, fermionic, and bosonic examples are worked out.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a practically checkable set of local conditions for i.i.d. steady states and identifies a broad class of exactly solvable open many-body models. The proofs are largely self-contained: Theorem 1 and Lemma 2 are derived explicitly, and Lemma 4 includes a full Schur-Weyl argument. The examples give explicit steady states and correlation functions, and no parameters are fitted. The main advertised no-go conclusion, however, is a corollary that requires uniqueness of the steady state; the unqualified statement in the abstract and introduction overstates the domain of validity.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Section I, with Corollaries 6 and 7]
  2. [Theorem 5 and Section II B]
minor comments (5)
  1. [Example 6, Eq. (122)]
  2. [Theorem 5, Eqs. (40)-(41)]
  3. [Appendix B, Lemma 15(1)]
  4. [Eq. (12)]
  5. [Section III A, proof of Theorem 8]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1, Lemma 2, and Lemma 4 are proved from the stated GKSL assumptions and standard Schur-Weyl duality; no fitted parameter or self-citation chain is load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. Theorem 1 is an equivalence proved by decomposing the Lindbladian into single-site superoperators and two-site Hamiltonian commutators, then reducing to Lemma 2; Lemma 2 is proved directly from partial traces of L(ρloc^⊗n)=0, and neither lemma defines its conclusion into its hypotheses. Lemma 4, the characterization of Bcom as span{P_σ} or as the double commutant {P_σ, n_i}'', is proved using Schur-Weyl duality with a self-contained proof in Appendix B, so it does not import the target theorem from the authors' prior work. Theorem 5 is definitionally close: Bcom is defined as the commutant of all tensor-power states, so [Hcom, ρloc^⊗n]=0 is immediate, and the remaining step is the standard existence of a single-site GKSL steady state; however, the nontrivial content of the paper lies in Lemma 4's characterization and in the equivalent conditions of Theorem 1, not in a fitted or predicted quantity. The paper itself notes the uniqueness limitation immediately after Theorem 5: 'Note that Theorem 5 does not ensure the uniqueness of the steady state.' Corollaries 6 and 7 explicitly add uniqueness of the steady state, and Corollary 7 additionally assumes the absence of purely imaginary Lindblad eigenvalues; the abstract's unqualified no-go sentence overstates the scope, but that is a correctness or framing issue, not a circularity. No empirical data are fitted, no parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation or imported-uniqueness argument appears. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorems are self-contained mathematical derivations with no fitted parameters. They rely on standard assumptions of finite-dimensional local Hilbert spaces, Markovian GKSL dynamics, local 1-local dissipation, and at most two-body Hamiltonians. The no-go corollaries add uniqueness and spectral gap assumptions. Schur-Weyl duality and the von Neumann bicommutant theorem are used as standard mathematics and proved in Appendix B.

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The local Hilbert space H_loc is finite-dimensional (d < infinity).
    Assumption 1 in Section II A. Used in the Schur-Weyl duality proof and in trace and dimension arguments throughout Theorems 1, 4, and 8.
  • domain assumption Time evolution is governed by the GKSL master equation with trace-preserving completely positive dynamics.
    Assumption 2 in Section II A. Defines the problem and ensures existence of at least one steady state for the single-site equation.
  • domain assumption All Lindblad operators are 1-local, acting on a single site.
    Assumption 3 in Section II A. The partial-trace decomposition of L into a sum of single-site superoperators requires this. Multi-site dissipators would invalidate the conditions of Theorem 1.
  • domain assumption The Hamiltonian consists of at most two-body terms for Theorems 1, 8, and most corollaries.
    Assumption 4 in Section II A. Theorem 5 and 5' drop this assumption, but the equivalent condition relies on the two-body decomposition H = sum H_ij + sum H_i.
  • domain assumption Fermion and massive boson systems obey the number superselection rule, so physical density matrices commute with the total particle number.
    Invoked in Lemma 4 and Theorem 8 to define B_com = {P_sigma, n_i}'' and to establish preservation of the physical subspace.
  • domain assumption For Corollaries 6 and 7, the steady state is unique; Corollary 7 additionally assumes no purely imaginary Lindbladian eigenvalues.
    Without uniqueness, existence of an i.i.d. steady state does not exclude other entangled steady states. The exponential decay statement needs the spectral gap condition.
  • standard math Schur-Weyl duality and the finite-dimensional von Neumann bicommutant theorem.
    Used in Lemma 4 to identify the commutant of tensor powers of density matrices with the span of permutation operators. Proofs are provided in Appendix B.
  • standard math Quantum regression theorem for Markovian open systems.
    Used in Theorem 9 to express two-time correlation functions in terms of the single-site dynamical map. Cited to references [28,83,84].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum i.i.d. Steady States in Open Many-Body Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XF2Y63UX

@misc{pith2026250710319,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum i.i.d. Steady States in Open Many-Body Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XF2Y63UX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10319}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding how a quantum many-body state is maintained stably as a nonequilibrium steady state is of fundamental and practical importance for exploration and exploitation of open quantum systems. We establish a general equivalent condition for an open quantum many-body system governed by the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad dynamics under local drive and/or dissipation to have a quantum independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) steady state. We present a sufficient condition for a system to have a quantum i.i.d. steady state by identifying a set of operators that commute with arbitrary quantum i.i.d. states. In particular, a set of quantum i.i.d. states is found to be an invariant subset of time evolution superoperators for systems that satisfy the sufficient condition. These findings not only identify a class of models with exactly solvable steady states but also lead to a no-go theorem that precludes quantum entanglement and spatial correlations in a broad class of quantum many-body steady states in a dissipative environment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10319 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Relationship between three classes of density matri [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schematic illustration of the action of the permuta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Relationship between the statements in Theorem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. If an open quantum many-body system satisfies the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [72]

    J. Jin, A. Biella, O. Viyuela, L. Mazza, J. Keeling, R. Fazio, and D. Rossini, Cluster mean-field approach to the steady-state phase diagram of dissipative spin sys- tems, Physical Review X 6, 031011 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [1]

    span { ˆX ⊗n| ˆX ∈ B(Hloc)}

  3. [2]

    span { ˆU ⊗n| ˆU ∈ B(Hloc), ˆU † ˆU = ˆI}

  4. [3]

    span { ˆH ⊗n| ˆH ∈ B(Hloc), ˆH † = ˆH}

  5. [4]

    Proof of Lemma 15 (1) span { ˆX ⊗n| ˆX ∈ B(Hloc)} = span{ ˆU ⊗n| ˆU ∈ B(Hloc), ˆU † ˆU = ˆI}

    span {ˆρ⊗n|ˆρ ∈ S(Hloc)}. Proof of Lemma 15 (1) span { ˆX ⊗n| ˆX ∈ B(Hloc)} = span{ ˆU ⊗n| ˆU ∈ B(Hloc), ˆU † ˆU = ˆI}. It is obvious that span { ˆX ⊗n| ˆX ∈ B(Hloc)} ⊃ span{ ˆU ⊗n| ˆU ∈ B(Hloc), ˆU † ˆU = ˆI}. Now, let us show that span { ˆX ⊗n| ˆX ∈ B(Hloc)} ⊂ span{ ˆU ⊗n| ˆU ∈ B(Hloc), ˆU † ˆU = ˆI}. Recalling Lemma 14, it suf- fices to show that span ...

  6. [5]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  7. [6]

    M. A. Norcia, A. W. Young, and A. M. Kaufman, Mi- croscopic control and detection of ultracold strontium in optical-tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041054 (2018)

    2018

  8. [7]

    Cooper, J

    A. Cooper, J. P. Covey, I. S. Madjarov, S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova, and M. Endres, Alkaline-earth atoms in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041055 (2018)

    2018

Show all 94 references
  1. [8]

    J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Quantum computations with 23 cold trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995)

    1995

  2. [9]

    Blatt and D

    R. Blatt and D. Wineland, Entangled states of trapped atomic ions, Nature 453, 1008 (2008)

    2008

  3. [10]

    J. T. Barreiro, M. M¨ uller, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, T. Monz, M. Chwalla, M. Hennrich, C. F. Roos, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, An open-system quantum simulator with trapped ions, Nature 470, 486 (2011)

    2011

  4. [11]

    Jaksch, J

    D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and M. D. Lukin, Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2208 (2000)

    2000

  5. [12]

    M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, R. Cote, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Dipole blockade and quantum information processing in mesoscopic atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037901 (2001)

    2001

  6. [13]

    Weimer, M

    H. Weimer, M. M¨ uller, I. Lesanovsky, P. Zoller, and H. P. B¨ uchler, A rydberg quantum simulator, Nature Physics 6, 382 (2010)

    2010

  7. [14]

    M. J. Hartmann, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, and M. B. Ple- nio, Strongly interacting polaritons in coupled arrays of cavities, Nature Physics 2, 849 (2006)

    2006

  8. [15]

    D. G. Angelakis, M. F. Santos, and S. Bose, Photon- blockade-induced mott transitions and xy spin models in coupled cavity arrays, Phys. Rev. A 76, 031805 (2007)

    2007

  9. [16]

    Fitzpatrick, N

    M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a dissipative phase tran- sition in a one-dimensional circuit qed lattice, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011016 (2017)

    2017

  10. [17]

    Baumann, C

    K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity, Nature 464, 1301 (2010)

    2010

  11. [18]

    Baumann, R

    K. Baumann, R. Mottl, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Exploring symmetry breaking at the dicke quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 140402 (2011)

    2011

  12. [19]

    Brennecke, R

    F. Brennecke, R. Mottl, K. Baumann, R. Landig, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Real-time observation of fluctuations at the driven-dissipative dicke phase transi- tion, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 11763 (2013)

    2013

  13. [20]

    Klinder, H

    J. Klinder, H. Keßler, M. Wolke, L. Mathey, and A. Hem- merich, Dynamical phase transition in the open dicke model, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 3290 (2015)

    2015

  14. [21]

    M. P. Baden, K. J. Arnold, A. L. Grimsmo, S. Parkins, and M. D. Barrett, Realization of the dicke model using cavity-assisted raman transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 020408 (2014)

    2014

  15. [22]

    J. M. Fink, A. Dombi, A. Vukics, A. Wallraff, and P. Domokos, Observation of the photon-blockade break- down phase transition, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011012 (2017)

    2017

  16. [23]

    D. Nagy, G. Szirmai, and P. Domokos, Self-organization of a bose-einstein condensate in an optical cavity, The European Physical Journal D 48, 127 (2008)

    2008

  17. [24]

    H. J. Carmichael, Breakdown of photon blockade: A dis- sipative quantum phase transition in zero dimensions, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031028 (2015)

    2015

  18. [25]

    Hwang, P

    M.-J. Hwang, P. Rabl, and M. B. Plenio, Dissipative phase transition in the open quantum rabi model, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013825 (2018)

    2018

  19. [26]

    L. V. Keldysh, Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1515 (1964)

    1964

  20. [27]

    Nakajima, On quantum theory of transport phenom- ena: Steady diffusion, Progress of Theoretical Physics 20, 948 (1958)

    S. Nakajima, On quantum theory of transport phenom- ena: Steady diffusion, Progress of Theoretical Physics 20, 948 (1958)

    1958

  21. [28]

    Zwanzig, Ensemble method in the theory of irre- versibility, The Journal of Chemical Physics 33, 1338 (1960)

    R. Zwanzig, Ensemble method in the theory of irre- versibility, The Journal of Chemical Physics 33, 1338 (1960)

    1960

  22. [29]

    REDFIELD, The Theory of Relaxation Processes, in Advances in Magnetic Resonance, Advances in Magnetic and Optical Resonance, Vol

    A. REDFIELD, The Theory of Relaxation Processes, in Advances in Magnetic Resonance, Advances in Magnetic and Optical Resonance, Vol. 1, edited by J. S. Waugh (Academic Press, 1965) pp. 1–32

    1965

  23. [30]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of n-level sys- tems, Journal of Mathematical Physics 17, 821 (1976)

    1976

  24. [31]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  25. [32]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The theory of open quantum systems (Oxford University Press, USA, 2002)

    2002

  26. [33]

    Yu and J

    T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Finite-time disentanglement via spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 140404 (2004)

    2004

  27. [34]

    Yu and J

    T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Quantum open system theory: Bipartite aspects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 140403 (2006)

    2006

  28. [35]

    Yu and J

    T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Sudden death of entanglement, Science 323, 598 (2009)

    2009

  29. [36]

    Gong and Y

    Z. Gong and Y. Ashida, Any quantum many-body state under local dissipation will be disentangled in finite time (2024), arXiv:2409.12639 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Z. Wang, R. Qi, Y. Lu, Z. Wu, and J. Jie, Absence of correlations in dissipative interacting qubits: A no-go theorem, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155129 (2024)

    2024

  31. [38]

    M. Suzuki, Relationship between d-dimensional quan- tal spin systems and (d+1)-dimensional ising systems: Equivalence, critical exponents and systematic approx- imants of the partition function and spin correlations, Progress of Theoretical Physics 56, 1454 (1976)

    1976

  32. [39]

    J. A. Hertz, Quantum critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. B 14, 1165 (1976)

    1976

  33. [40]

    Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions, Physics World 12, 33 (1999)

    S. Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions, Physics World 12, 33 (1999)

    1999

  34. [41]

    Suzuki, J.-i

    S. Suzuki, J.-i. Inoue, and B. K. Chakrabarti, Quantum Ising phases and transitions in transverse Ising models , Vol. 862 (Springer, 2012)

    2012

  35. [42]

    Hubbard and B

    J. Hubbard and B. H. Flowers, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 276, 238 (1963)

    1963

  36. [43]

    Tomonaga, Remarks on bloch’s method of sound waves applied to many-fermion problems, Progress of Theoretical Physics 5, 544 (1950)

    S.-i. Tomonaga, Remarks on bloch’s method of sound waves applied to many-fermion problems, Progress of Theoretical Physics 5, 544 (1950)

    1950

  37. [44]

    J. M. Luttinger, An exactly soluble model of a many- fermion system, Journal of Mathematical Physics4, 1154 (1963)

    1963

  38. [45]

    D. C. Mattis and E. H. Lieb, Exact solution of a many- fermion system and its associated boson field, Journal of Mathematical Physics 6, 304 (1965)

    1965

  39. [46]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Annals of Physics 321, 2 (2006), january Special Issue

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Annals of Physics 321, 2 (2006), january Special Issue

    2006

  40. [47]

    Prosen and I

    T. Prosen and I. Piˇ zorn, Quantum phase transition in a far-from-equilibrium steady state of an xy spin chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 105701 (2008)

    2008

  41. [48]

    ˇZnidariˇ c, Exact solution for a diffusive nonequilib- rium steady state of an open quantum chain, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2010, L05002 (2010)

    M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Exact solution for a diffusive nonequilib- rium steady state of an open quantum chain, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2010, L05002 (2010)

    2010

  42. [49]

    ˇZnidariˇ c, Solvable quantum nonequilibrium model ex- hibiting a phase transition and a matrix product repre- 24 sentation, Phys

    M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Solvable quantum nonequilibrium model ex- hibiting a phase transition and a matrix product repre- 24 sentation, Phys. Rev. E 83, 011108 (2011)

    2011

  43. [50]

    Popkov, D

    V. Popkov, D. Karevski, and G. M. Sch¨ utz, Driven isotropic heisenberg spin chain with arbitrary boundary twisting angle: Exact results, Phys. Rev. E 88, 062118 (2013)

    2013

  44. [51]

    Karevski, V

    D. Karevski, V. Popkov, and G. M. Sch¨ utz, Exact matrix product solution for the boundary-driven lindblad xxz chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 047201 (2013)

    2013

  45. [52]

    Prosen, Exact nonequilibrium steady state of a strongly driven open xxz chain, Phys

    T. Prosen, Exact nonequilibrium steady state of a strongly driven open xxz chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 137201 (2011)

    2011

  46. [53]

    Popkov, T

    V. Popkov, T. Prosen, and L. Zadnik, Exact nonequi- librium steady state of open xxz/xyz spin-1/2 chain with dirichlet boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 160403 (2020)

    2020

  47. [54]

    Lingenfelter, M

    A. Lingenfelter, M. Yao, A. Pocklington, Y.-X. Wang, A. Irfan, W. Pfaff, and A. A. Clerk, Exact results for a boundary-driven double spin chain and resource-efficient remote entanglement stabilization, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021028 (2024)

    2024

  48. [55]

    Popkov and T

    V. Popkov and T. Prosen, Exact ness of xxz circuits boundary driven with arbitrary resets or fields (2025), arXiv:2502.06731 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Stannigel, P

    K. Stannigel, P. Rabl, and P. Zoller, Driven-dissipative preparation of entangled states in cascaded quantum- optical networks, New Journal of Physics 14, 063014 (2012)

    2012

  50. [57]

    Roberts and A

    D. Roberts and A. A. Clerk, Exact solution of the infinite-range dissipative transverse-field ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 190403 (2023)

    2023

  51. [58]

    Ramos, H

    T. Ramos, H. Pichler, A. J. Daley, and P. Zoller, Quan- tum spin dimers from chiral dissipation in cold-atom chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 237203 (2014)

    2014

  52. [59]

    McDonald and A

    A. McDonald and A. A. Clerk, Exact solutions of inter- acting dissipative systems via weak symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 033602 (2022)

    2022

  53. [60]

    Foss-Feig, A

    M. Foss-Feig, A. J. Daley, J. K. Thompson, and A. M. Rey, Steady-state many-body entanglement of hot reac- tive fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 230501 (2012)

    2012

  54. [61]

    Rosso, L

    L. Rosso, L. Mazza, and A. Biella, Eightfold way to dark states in su(3) cold gases with two-body losses, Phys. Rev. A 105, L051302 (2022)

    2022

  55. [62]

    Yoshida and H

    H. Yoshida and H. Katsura, Liouvillian gap and sin- gle spin-flip dynamics in the dissipative fermi-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A 107, 033332 (2023)

    2023

  56. [63]

    Prosen, Exact nonequilibrium steady state of an open hubbard chain, Phys

    T. Prosen, Exact nonequilibrium steady state of an open hubbard chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 030603 (2014)

    2014

  57. [64]

    Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open fermi systems, New Journal of Physics 10, 043026 (2008)

    T. Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open fermi systems, New Journal of Physics 10, 043026 (2008)

    2008

  58. [65]

    C. N. Yang, Some exact results for the many-body prob- lem in one dimension with repulsive delta-function inter- action, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1312 (1967)

    1967

  59. [66]

    A. A. Ziolkowska and F. H. Essler, Yang-Baxter inte- grable Lindblad equations, SciPost Phys. 8, 044 (2020)

    2020

  60. [67]

    Buˇ ca, C

    B. Buˇ ca, C. Booker, M. Medenjak, and D. Jaksch, Bethe ansatz approach for dissipation: exact solutions of quan- tum many-body dynamics under loss, New Journal of Physics 22, 123040 (2020)

    2020

  61. [68]

    Nakagawa, N

    M. Nakagawa, N. Kawakami, and M. Ueda, Exact liouvil- lian spectrum of a one-dimensional dissipative hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 110404 (2021)

    2021

  62. [69]

    de Leeuw, C

    M. de Leeuw, C. Paletta, and B. Pozsgay, Constructing integrable lindblad superoperators, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 240403 (2021)

    2021

  63. [70]

    Alba, Free fermions with dephasing and boundary driving: Bethe Ansatz results, SciPost Phys

    V. Alba, Free fermions with dephasing and boundary driving: Bethe Ansatz results, SciPost Phys. Core 8, 011 (2025)

    2025

  64. [71]

    Roberts, A

    D. Roberts, A. Lingenfelter, and A. Clerk, Hidden time- reversal symmetry, quantum detailed balance and exact solutions of driven-dissipative quantum systems, PRX Quantum 2, 020336 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens, Refer- ence frames, superselection rules, and quantum informa- tion, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 555 (2007)

    2007

  66. [74]

    Schur, ¨Uber eine Klasse von Matrizen, die sich einer gegebenen Matrix zuordnen lassen (1901)

    I. Schur, ¨Uber eine Klasse von Matrizen, die sich einer gegebenen Matrix zuordnen lassen (1901)

    1901

  67. [75]

    Weyl, The classical groups: their invariants and rep- resentations, Vol

    H. Weyl, The classical groups: their invariants and rep- resentations, Vol. 1 (Princeton university press, 1946)

    1946

  68. [76]

    ˇZnidariˇ c, Dissipative remote-state preparation in an interacting medium, Phys

    M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Dissipative remote-state preparation in an interacting medium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 030403 (2016)

    2016

  69. [77]

    Spohn, Approach to equilibrium for completely pos- itive dynamical semigroups of n-level systems, Reports on Mathematical Physics 10, 189 (1976)

    H. Spohn, Approach to equilibrium for completely pos- itive dynamical semigroups of n-level systems, Reports on Mathematical Physics 10, 189 (1976)

    1976

  70. [78]

    Spohn, An algebraic condition for the approach to equilibrium of an open n-level system, Letters in Mathe- matical Physics 2, 33 (1977)

    H. Spohn, An algebraic condition for the approach to equilibrium of an open n-level system, Letters in Mathe- matical Physics 2, 33 (1977)

    1977

  71. [79]

    D. E. Evans, Irreducible quantum dynamical semi- groups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 54, 293 (1977)

    1977

  72. [80]

    Frigerio, Quantum dynamical semigroups and ap- proach to equilibrium, Letters in Mathematical Physics 2, 79 (1977)

    A. Frigerio, Quantum dynamical semigroups and ap- proach to equilibrium, Letters in Mathematical Physics 2, 79 (1977)

    1977

  73. [81]

    Frigerio, Stationary states of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 63, 269 (1978)

    A. Frigerio, Stationary states of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 63, 269 (1978)

    1978

  74. [82]

    Fagnola and R

    F. Fagnola and R. Rebolledo, Subharmonic projections for a quantum markov semigroup, Journal of Mathemat- ical Physics 43, 1074 (2002)

    2002

  75. [83]

    D. Nigro, On the uniqueness of the steady-state solution of the lindblad–gorini–kossakowski–sudarshan equation, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experi- ment 2019, 043202 (2019)

    2019

  76. [84]

    Yoshida, Uniqueness of steady states of gorini- kossakowski-sudarshan-lindblad equations: A simple proof, Phys

    H. Yoshida, Uniqueness of steady states of gorini- kossakowski-sudarshan-lindblad equations: A simple proof, Phys. Rev. A 109, 022218 (2024)

    2024

  77. [85]

    Tr h ˆQ(1) 0 i is always non-zero

  78. [86]

    D. A. Lidar, I. L. Chuang, and K. B. Whaley, Decoherence-free subspaces for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998)

    1998

  79. [87]

    Lax, Formal Theory of Quantum Fluctuations from a Driven State, Phys

    M. Lax, Formal Theory of Quantum Fluctuations from a Driven State, Phys. Rev. 129, 2342 (1963)

    1963

  80. [88]

    C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum noise, Vol. 56 of Springer series in synergetics, Springer–Verlag, Berlin 97, 98 (2000)

    2000

  81. [89]

    Campos Venuti and P

    L. Campos Venuti and P. Zanardi, Dynamical response theory for driven-dissipative quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 93, 032101 (2016)

    2016

  82. [90]

    M. Ban, S. Kitajima, T. Arimitsu, and F. Shibata, Lin- ear response theory for open systems: Quantum master equation approach, Phys. Rev. A 95, 022126 (2017)

    2017

  83. [91]

    Konopik and E

    M. Konopik and E. Lutz, Quantum response theory for 25 nonequilibrium steady states, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033156 (2019)

    2019

  84. [92]

    F. H. Essler, H. Frahm, F. G¨ ohmann, A. Kl¨ umper, and V. E. Korepin, The one-dimensional Hubbard model (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    2005

  85. [93]

    Fulton and J

    W. Fulton and J. Harris, Representation theory: a first course, Vol. 129 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  86. [94]

    Watrous, The theory of quantum information (Cam- bridge university press, 2018)

    J. Watrous, The theory of quantum information (Cam- bridge university press, 2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.