pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.08359 · v4 · submitted 2025-08-11 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.CO· hep-ph

A Compact Story of Positivity in de Sitter

Priyesh Chakraborty , Timothy Cohen , Daniel Green , Yiwen Huang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords de Sitter spaceanomalous dimensionspositivity constraintsvertex operatorscompact scalarsloop correctionsspectral representationrenormalization group flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

Positivity of anomalous dimensions holds for principal series fields coupled to vertex operators of compact scalars in de Sitter space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines loop corrections to de Sitter correlators that generate anomalous dimensions which are not manifestly real. It centers on vertex operators for compact scalar fields because these introduce new complications compared to other cases. Comparing the spectral representation approach with the effective theory approach resolves apparent disagreements in the computed dimensions for principal series fields. New proofs establish that these dimensions are positive, and the renormalization group flow in the effective theory matches the resummation of bubble diagrams in the spectral representation. A sympathetic reader would care because these results supply concrete theoretical constraints on de Sitter correlators even when light scalars are present.

Core claim

The general arguments that yield positivity constraints on de Sitter correlators from both the spectral representation and effective theory perspectives continue to apply without modification when the scalars are compact and the operators are vertex operators. This allows resolution of apparent disagreements between different techniques for calculating the anomalous dimensions for principal series fields coupled to these vertex operators, along with new proofs of positivity of the anomalous dimensions and an explanation of why the renormalization group flow associated with these anomalous dimensions in the effective theory is the same as resumming bubble diagrams in the spectral approach.

What carries the argument

Vertex operators for compact scalar fields, which couple to principal series fields and generate the anomalous dimensions whose positivity is under study.

If this is right

  • Anomalous dimensions for principal series fields remain positive when coupled to compact scalar vertex operators.
  • The spectral representation and effective theory techniques agree once apparent disagreements are resolved.
  • Renormalization group flow in the effective theory is equivalent to resumming bubble diagrams in the spectral representation.
  • Positivity constraints on correlators apply in the compact scalar case just as in non-compact cases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same positivity logic may apply to other operator classes that introduce similar non-manifestly real dimensions.
  • Equivalence of the two methods could simplify systematic calculations of higher-order loop effects in de Sitter backgrounds.
  • These results suggest a route to checking positivity directly in concrete models with compact scalars.

Load-bearing premise

The general arguments that yield positivity constraints on de Sitter correlators continue to apply without modification when the scalars are compact and the operators are vertex operators.

What would settle it

An explicit loop calculation that produces a negative anomalous dimension for a principal series field coupled to a compact scalar vertex operator would show that the positivity claim does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.08359 by Daniel Green, Priyesh Chakraborty, Timothy Cohen, Yiwen Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: We illustrate the contours corresponding to the two inversion integrals for the spectral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: We illustrate two possibilities for the integration contour on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: We show the result of the two choices for evaluating the Lorentzian inversion formula [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: We plot the leading order corrected spectral density for a principal series scalar with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent developments have yielded significant progress towards systematically understanding loop corrections to de Sitter (dS) correlators. In close analogy with physics in Anti-de Sitter (AdS), large logarithms can result from loops that can be interpreted as corrections to the dimensions of operators. In contrast with AdS, these dimensions are not manifestly real. This implies that the theoretical constraints on the associated correlators are less transparent, particularly in the presence of light scalars. In this paper, we revisit these issues by performing and comparing calculations using the spectral representation approach and the Soft de Sitter Effective Theory (SdSET). We review the general arguments that yield positivity constraints on dS correlators from both perspectives. Our particular focus will be on vertex operators for compact scalar fields, since this case introduces novel complications. We will explain how to resolve apparent disagreements between different techniques for calculating the anomalous dimensions for principal series fields coupled to these vertex operators. Along the way, we will offer new proofs of positivity of the anomalous dimensions, and explain why renormalization group flow associated with these anomalous dimensions in SdSET is the same as resumming bubble diagrams in the spectral representation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews general positivity constraints on de Sitter correlators from both the spectral representation and SdSET perspectives. It focuses on vertex operators for compact scalar fields, resolves apparent disagreements in anomalous dimensions for principal series fields, provides new proofs of positivity, and equates SdSET RG flow with spectral bubble-diagram resummation.

Significance. If the positivity statements hold for the compact case, the work supplies useful theoretical constraints on loop-corrected dS correlators involving light scalars and offers a concrete cross-check between two distinct formalisms. The explicit demonstration that SdSET RG flow reproduces spectral resummation is a concrete strength that reduces method-specific artifacts.

major comments (1)
  1. [vertex-operator discussion / positivity proofs] The central claims rest on the assertion that standard positivity arguments carry over unchanged to compact scalars and vertex operators e^{i n ϕ}. The manuscript should supply an explicit check (e.g., in the section deriving the spectral density or the OPE) that no step relies on continuous momentum or non-compact field range; otherwise the positivity proofs and the resolution of disagreements remain conditional.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise definition of the principal-series fields and the range of the integer charge n in the vertex operators to avoid ambiguity in the comparison between methods.
  2. Add a short table or paragraph summarizing the numerical or analytic values of the anomalous dimensions obtained from each formalism before and after the resolution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarification in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claims rest on the assertion that standard positivity arguments carry over unchanged to compact scalars and vertex operators e^{i n ϕ}. The manuscript should supply an explicit check (e.g., in the section deriving the spectral density or the OPE) that no step relies on continuous momentum or non-compact field range; otherwise the positivity proofs and the resolution of disagreements remain conditional.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification would improve clarity. While the manuscript already highlights the novel complications of compact scalars and resolves the apparent disagreements in anomalous dimensions for principal series fields, we will add a short dedicated paragraph in the spectral representation section (immediately following the derivation of the spectral density) that explicitly confirms the positivity arguments do not rely on continuous momentum or non-compact field range. This paragraph will note that the key steps—OPE convergence, the form of the spectral integral, and the sign of the spectral density—depend only on the periodicity of ϕ and the resulting integer winding modes of the vertex operators e^{i n ϕ}, which are already used throughout our calculations. The same check will be referenced in the SdSET discussion to ensure the positivity proofs and disagreement resolution are unconditional for the compact case. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations rely on reviewed general arguments applied to compact case with explicit cross-checks between distinct formalisms

full rationale

The paper reviews general positivity arguments from both the spectral representation and SdSET perspectives, then focuses on their application to vertex operators of compact scalars while resolving apparent disagreements via new proofs and explaining the equivalence of RG flow to bubble resummation. These steps are presented as independent cross-checks between two formalisms rather than reductions by construction, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chains. No equations or claims reduce a derived result to a fitted input or prior author result by renaming or ansatz smuggling; the extension to the compact case is treated as a novel application with explicit handling of complications, keeping the central claims self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claims rest on standard QFT assumptions in curved spacetime and on the applicability of both the spectral representation and SdSET to compact scalars; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the summary.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption General arguments that yield positivity constraints on dS correlators apply to vertex operators for compact scalar fields
    Invoked when the paper states it will review these arguments from both perspectives.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1317 out tokens · 53187 ms · 2026-05-18T23:15:23.449805+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the simplicity of de Sitter correlators

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    De Sitter correlators in conformally coupled φ³ theory admit a time-integral representation built from flat-space correlators, revealing intrinsic simplifications including vanishing of odd conjugate-momentum graphs a...

  2. Strongly Coupled Sectors in Inflation: Gapped Theories of Unparticles

    hep-th 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Compactified 5D unparticle theories generate gapped excitations whose exchange in inflationary correlators yields oscillations modulated by anomalous dimensions and possible interference patterns under brane-localized...

  3. Scalars at the Cosmological Collider: Full Shapes of Tree Diagrams and Bispectrum Searches using Planck Data

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Unified tree-level bispectrum shapes for cosmological collider processes are computed and searched in Planck data, yielding no detection but a weak hint for chemical potential extensions at ω - M ≃ 3H.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 44 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Ach \'u carro , M

    A. Ach´ ucarroet al., “Inflation: Theory and Observations,” arXiv:2203.08128 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    Nonlinear evolution of long wavelength metric fluctuations in inflationary models,

    D. S. Salopek and J. R. Bond, “Nonlinear evolution of long wavelength metric fluctuations in inflationary models,” Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 3936–3962

    work page 1990

  3. [3]

    Adiabatic Modes in Cosmology

    S. Weinberg, “Adiabatic modes in cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 123504, arXiv:astro-ph/0302326

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models

    J. M. Maldacena, “Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,” JHEP 05 (2003) 013, arXiv:astro-ph/0210603

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  5. [5]

    Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function

    P. Creminelli and M. Zaldarriaga, “Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function,” JCAP 10 (2004) 006, arXiv:astro-ph/0407059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  6. [6]

    Quasi-Single Field Inflation and Non-Gaussianities

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Quasi-Single Field Inflation and Non-Gaussianities,” JCAP 04 (2010) 027, arXiv:0911.3380 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Features of heavy physics in the CMB power spectrum

    A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, “Features of heavy physics in the CMB power spectrum,” JCAP 01 (2011) 030, arXiv:1010.3693 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Signatures of Supersymmetry from the Early Universe

    D. Baumann and D. Green, “Signatures of Supersymmetry from the Early Universe,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 103520, arXiv:1109.0292 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    Effective field theory approach to quasi-single field inflation and effects of heavy fields

    T. Noumi, M. Yamaguchi, and D. Yokoyama, “Effective field theory approach to quasi-single field inflation and effects of heavy fields,” JHEP 06 (2013) 051, arXiv:1211.1624 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    Quasi-Single Field Inflation with Large Mass

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Quasi-Single Field Inflation with Large Mass,” JCAP 09 (2012) 021, arXiv:1205.0160 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    On Soft Limits of Inflationary Correlation Functions

    V. Assassi, D. Baumann, and D. Green, “On Soft Limits of Inflationary Correlation Functions,” JCAP 11 (2012) 047, arXiv:1204.4207 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  12. [12]

    Anomalous Dimensions and Non-Gaussianity

    D. Green, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore, E. Silverstein, and M. Zaldarriaga, “Anomalous Dimensions and Non-Gaussianity,” JHEP 10 (2013) 171, arXiv:1301.2630 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    Non-Gaussianity as a Particle Detector

    H. Lee, D. Baumann, and G. L. Pimentel, “Non-Gaussianity as a Particle Detector,” JHEP 12 (2016) 040, arXiv:1607.03735 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Standard Model Background of the Cosmological Collider

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Standard Model Background of the Cosmological Collider,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 no. 26, (2017) 261302, arXiv:1610.06597 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Biasing and the search for primordial non-Gaussianity beyond the local type

    J. Gleyzes, R. de Putter, D. Green, and O. Dor´ e, “Biasing and the search for primordial non-Gaussianity beyond the local type,” JCAP 04 (2017) 002, arXiv:1612.06366 [astro-ph.CO]. 45

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Prospects for Cosmological Collider Physics

    P. D. Meerburg, M. M¨ unchmeyer, J. B. Mu˜ noz, and X. Chen, “Prospects for Cosmological Collider Physics,” JCAP 03 (2017) 050, arXiv:1610.06559 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Kumar and R

    S. Kumar and R. Sundrum, “Cosmological Collider Physics and the Curvaton,” JHEP 04 (2020) 077, arXiv:1908.11378 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Jazayeri, S

    S. Jazayeri, S. Renaux-Petel, and D. Werth, “Shapes of the cosmological low-speed collider,” JCAP 12 (2023) 035, arXiv:2307.01751 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Green , Y

    D. Green, Y. Guo, J. Han, and B. Wallisch, “Light fields during inflation from BOSS and future galaxy surveys,” JCAP 05 (2024) 090, arXiv:2311.04882 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Cabass , O

    G. Cabass, O. H. E. Philcox, M. M. Ivanov, K. Akitsu, S.-F. Chen, M. Simonovi´ c, and M. Zaldarriaga, “BOSS constraints on massive particles during inflation: The cosmological collider in action,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 6, (2025) 063510, arXiv:2404.01894 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Sohn , D.-G

    W. Sohn, D.-G. Wang, J. R. Fergusson, and E. P. S. Shellard, “Searching for cosmological collider in the Planck CMB data,” JCAP 09 (2024) 016, arXiv:2404.07203 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Cosmological Collider Physics

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, “Cosmological Collider Physics,” arXiv:1503.08043 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Snowmass White Paper: The Cosmological Bootstrap,

    D. Baumann, D. Green, A. Joyce, E. Pajer, G. L. Pimentel, C. Sleight, and M. Taronna, “Snowmass White Paper: The Cosmological Bootstrap,” SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep. 2024 (2024) 1, arXiv:2203.08121 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Effective Theory of Squeezed Correlation Functions

    M. Mirbabayi and M. Simonovi´ c, “Effective Theory of Squeezed Correlation Functions,” JCAP 03 (2016) 056, arXiv:1507.04755 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Green, EFT for de Sitter Space

    D. Green, EFT for de Sitter Space . 2023. arXiv:2210.05820 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Constraints on local primordial non-Gaussianity from large scale structure

    A. Slosar, C. Hirata, U. Seljak, S. Ho, and N. Padmanabhan, “Constraints on local primordial non-Gaussianity from large scale structure,” JCAP 08 (2008) 031, arXiv:0805.3580 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  27. [27]

    Higher N-point function data analysis techniques for heavy particle production and WMAP results,

    M. M¨ unchmeyer and K. M. Smith, “Higher N-point function data analysis techniques for heavy particle production and WMAP results,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 12, (2019) 123511, arXiv:1910.00596 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Cabass, M.M

    G. Cabass, M. M. Ivanov, and O. H. E. Philcox, “Colliders and ghosts: Constraining inflation with the parity-odd galaxy four-point function,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 2, (2023) 023523, arXiv:2210.16320 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Searching for inflationary particle production in Planck data,

    O. H. E. Philcox, S. Kumar, and J. C. Hill, “Searching for inflationary particle production in Planck data,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 10, (2025) 103523, arXiv:2405.03738 [astro-ph.CO]. 46

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Philcox,Searching for inflationary physics with the CMB trispectrum

    O. H. E. Philcox, “Searching for Inflationary Physics with the CMB Trispectrum: 3. Constraints from Planck,” arXiv:2502.06931 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Les Houches Lectures on De Sitter Space

    M. Spradlin, A. Strominger, and A. Volovich, “Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space,” in Les Houches Summer School: Session 76: Euro Summer School on Unity of Fundamental Physics: Gravity, Gauge Theory and Strings , pp. 423–453. 10, 2001. arXiv:hep-th/0110007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  32. [32]

    The dS/CFT Correspondence

    A. Strominger, “The dS / CFT correspondence,” JHEP 10 (2001) 034, arXiv:hep-th/0106113

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  33. [33]

    On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation

    J. M. Maldacena and G. L. Pimentel, “On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,” JHEP 09 (2011) 045, arXiv:1104.2846 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  34. [34]

    Conformal Invariance, Dark Energy, and CMB Non-Gaussianity

    I. Antoniadis, P. O. Mazur, and E. Mottola, “Conformal Invariance, Dark Energy, and CMB Non-Gaussianity,” JCAP 09 (2012) 024, arXiv:1103.4164 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    Conformal invariance of scalar perturbations in inflation

    P. Creminelli, “Conformal invariance of scalar perturbations in inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 041302, arXiv:1108.0874 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    Particle decays and stability on the de Sitter universe

    J. Bros, H. Epstein, and U. Moschella, “Particle decays and stability on the de Sitter universe,” Annales Henri Poincare 11 (2010) 611–658, arXiv:0812.3513 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    The IR stability of de Sitter: Loop corrections to scalar propagators

    D. Marolf and I. A. Morrison, “The IR stability of de Sitter: Loop corrections to scalar propagators,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 105032, arXiv:1006.0035 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  38. [38]

    Melville and E

    S. Melville and E. Pajer, “Cosmological Cutting Rules,” JHEP 05 (2021) 249, arXiv:2103.09832 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Goodhew, S

    H. Goodhew, S. Jazayeri, M. H. G. Lee, and E. Pajer, “Cutting cosmological correlators,” JCAP 08 (2021) 003, arXiv:2104.06587 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Meltzer,The inflationary wavefunction from analyticity and factorization,JCAP12(2021) 018 [2107.10266]

    D. Meltzer, “The inflationary wavefunction from analyticity and factorization,” JCAP 12 no. 12, (2021) 018, arXiv:2107.10266 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Goodhew, A

    H. Goodhew, A. Thavanesan, and A. C. Wall, “The Cosmological CPT Theorem,” arXiv:2408.17406 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time,

    A. Higuchi, “Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time,” Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987) 397–436

    work page 1987

  43. [43]

    Non-Gaussianity in the modulated reheating scenario

    T. Suyama and M. Yamaguchi, “Non-Gaussianity in the modulated reheating scenario,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 023505, arXiv:0709.2545 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  44. [44]

    A universal bound on N-point correlations from inflation

    K. M. Smith, M. LoVerde, and M. Zaldarriaga, “A universal bound on N-point correlations from inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 191301, arXiv:1108.1805 [astro-ph.CO]. 47

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [45]

    Hogervorst, J.a

    M. Hogervorst, J. a. Penedones, and K. S. Vaziri, “Towards the non-perturbative cosmological bootstrap,” JHEP 02 (2023) 162, arXiv:2107.13871 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Di Pietro, V

    L. Di Pietro, V. Gorbenko, and S. Komatsu, “Analyticity and unitarity for cosmological correlators,” JHEP 03 (2022) 023, arXiv:2108.01695 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Loparco, J

    M. Loparco, J. Penedones, K. Salehi Vaziri, and Z. Sun, “The K¨ all´ en-Lehmann representation in de Sitter spacetime,” JHEP 12 (2023) 159, arXiv:2306.00090 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Operator origin of anomalous dimensions in de Sitter space,

    T. Cohen, D. Green, and Y. Huang, “Operator origin of anomalous dimensions in de Sitter space,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 10, (2025) 103513, arXiv:2407.08581 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Positivity from Cosmological Correlators,

    D. Green, Y. Huang, C.-H. Shen, and D. Baumann, “Positivity from Cosmological Correlators,” JHEP 04 (2024) 034, arXiv:2310.02490 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Evaluation of the Derivative Quartic Terms of the Meson Chiral Lagrangian From Forward Dispersion Relation,

    T. N. Pham and T. N. Truong, “Evaluation of the Derivative Quartic Terms of the Meson Chiral Lagrangian From Forward Dispersion Relation,” Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 3027

    work page 1985

  51. [51]

    Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion

    A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi, “Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion,” JHEP 10 (2006) 014, arXiv:hep-th/0602178

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  52. [52]

    de Rham, S

    C. de Rham, S. Kundu, M. Reece, A. J. Tolley, and S.-Y. Zhou, “Snowmass White Paper: UV Constraints on IR Physics,” in Snowmass 2021. 3, 2022. arXiv:2203.06805 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Signs of Analyticity in Single-Field Inflation

    D. Baumann, D. Green, H. Lee, and R. A. Porto, “Signs of Analyticity in Single-Field Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 2, (2016) 023523, arXiv:1502.07304 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    Dynamical Constraints on RG Flows and Cosmology,

    D. Baumann, D. Green, and T. Hartman, “Dynamical Constraints on RG Flows and Cosmology,” JHEP 12 (2019) 134, arXiv:1906.10226 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    Positivity bounds without boosts: New constraints on low energy effective field theories from the UV,

    T. Grall and S. Melville, “Positivity bounds without boosts: New constraints on low energy effective field theories from the UV,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 12, (2022) L121301, arXiv:2102.05683 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    Creminelli, O

    P. Creminelli, O. Janssen, and L. Senatore, “Positivity bounds on effective field theories with spontaneously broken Lorentz invariance,” JHEP 09 (2022) 201, arXiv:2207.14224 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    A de Sitter S-matrix from amputated cosmological correlators,

    S. Melville and G. L. Pimentel, “A de Sitter S-matrix from amputated cosmological correlators,” JHEP 08 (2024) 211, arXiv:2404.05712 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Perturbative unitarity bounds from momentum-space entanglement,

    C. D. Pueyo, H. Goodhew, C. McCulloch, and E. Pajer, “Perturbative unitarity bounds from momentum-space entanglement,” arXiv:2410.23709 [hep-th] . 48

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    Snowmass White Paper: Cosmology at the Theory Frontier,

    R. Flauger, V. Gorbenko, A. Joyce, L. McAllister, G. Shiu, and E. Silverstein, “Snowmass White Paper: Cosmology at the Theory Frontier,” in Snowmass 2021. 3, 2022. arXiv:2203.07629 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Infinite irreducible representations of the lorentz group,

    Harish-Chandra, “Infinite irreducible representations of the lorentz group,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 189 no. 1018, (1947) 372–401. http://www.jstor.org/stable/97833

    work page 1947

  61. [61]

    Irreducible unitary representations of the Lorentz group,

    V. Bargmann, “Irreducible unitary representations of the Lorentz group,” Annals Math. 48 (1947) 568–640

    work page 1947

  62. [62]

    On unitary representations of the group of de sitter space,

    L. H. Thomas, “On unitary representations of the group of de sitter space,” Annals of Mathematics 42 no. 1, (1941) 113–126. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1968990

    work page arXiv 1941

  63. [63]

    A note on the representations of the de sitter group,

    T. D. Newton, “A note on the representations of the de sitter group,” Annals of Mathematics 51 no. 3, (1950) 730–733. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1969376

    work page arXiv 1950

  64. [64]

    A note on the representations of SO(1 , d + 1),

    Z. Sun, “A note on the representations of SO(1,d + 1),” Rev. Math. Phys. 37 no. 01, (2025) 2430007, arXiv:2111.04591 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Hilbert space of Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter spacetime,

    J. Penedones, K. Salehi Vaziri, and Z. Sun, “Hilbert space of Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter spacetime,” arXiv:2301.04146 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    Applied Conformal Field Theory

    P. H. Ginsparg, “APPLIED CONFORMAL FIELD THEORY,” in Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics: Fields, Strings, Critical Phenomena . 9, 1988. arXiv:hep-th/9108028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  67. [67]

    Gorbenko and L

    V. Gorbenko and L. Senatore, “ λϕ4 in dS,” arXiv:1911.00022 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1911

  68. [68]

    Baumgart and R

    M. Baumgart and R. Sundrum, “De Sitter Diagrammar and the Resummation of Time,” JHEP 07 (2020) 119, arXiv:1912.09502 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    Mirbabayi,Infrared dynamics of a light scalar field in de Sitter,JCAP12(2020) 006, [1911.00564]

    M. Mirbabayi, “Infrared dynamics of a light scalar field in de Sitter,” JCAP 12 (2020) 006, arXiv:1911.00564 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Cohen and D

    T. Cohen and D. Green, “Soft de Sitter Effective Theory,” JHEP 12 (2020) 041, arXiv:2007.03693 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  71. [71]

    Markovian dynamics in de Sitter,

    M. Mirbabayi, “Markovian dynamics in de Sitter,” JCAP 09 (2021) 038, arXiv:2010.06604 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    The Birth of Inflationary Universes,

    A. Vilenkin, “The Birth of Inflationary Universes,” Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 2848

    work page 1983

  73. [73]

    STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,” Lect. Notes Phys. 246 (1986) 107–126

    work page 1986

  74. [74]

    The Fractal Dimension of Inflationary Universe,

    M. Aryal and A. Vilenkin, “The Fractal Dimension of Inflationary Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 199 (1987) 351–357. 49

    work page 1987

  75. [75]

    Cohen, D

    T. Cohen, D. Green, A. Premkumar, and A. Ridgway, “Stochastic Inflation at NNLO,” JHEP 09 (2021) 159, arXiv:2106.09728 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    Cohen, D

    T. Cohen, D. Green, and A. Premkumar, “A tail of eternal inflation,” SciPost Phys. 14 no. 5, (2023) 109, arXiv:2111.09332 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    Chakraborty and J

    P. Chakraborty and J. Stout, “Compact scalars at the cosmological collider,” JHEP 03 (2024) 149, arXiv:2311.09219 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Chakraborty and J

    P. Chakraborty and J. Stout, “Light scalars at the cosmological collider,” JHEP 02 (2024) 021, arXiv:2310.01494 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,

    J. M. Bardeen, “Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1882–1905

    work page 1980

  80. [80]

    The Effective Field Theory of Inflation

    C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and L. Senatore, “The Effective Field Theory of Inflation,” JHEP 03 (2008) 014, arXiv:0709.0293 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

Showing first 80 references.