Black holes of multiple horizons without mass inflation
Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:27 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Black holes with multiple horizons avoid mass inflation when inner horizons coincide and surface gravities vanish.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
By using nonlinear Maxwell field sources and making the inner horizons coincide so that the surface gravities of every inner horizon vanish, black hole solutions with multiple horizons are obtained that do not exhibit mass inflation.
What carries the argument
Coincidence of inner horizons in the metric, which sets surface gravities to zero and removes the exponential amplification of perturbations.
If this is right
- The constructed solutions remain free of mass inflation because the surface-gravity factor driving exponential growth is absent.
- Nonlinear Maxwell fields allow explicit metric solutions realizing these degenerate multi-horizon configurations.
- Multiple-horizon black holes can be stable against perturbations that would otherwise trigger mass inflation.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same degeneracy trick could be tested in other nonlinear electrodynamics models to see whether stable inner horizons appear more generally.
- If these solutions are regular, they might provide concrete examples for studying the causal structure of spacetimes with more than two horizons.
- Perturbation analysis beyond linear order in these metrics would directly test whether the absence of mass inflation survives in the nonlinear regime.
Load-bearing premise
Vanishing surface gravity at a degenerate inner horizon, as seen in linear analysis, is enough to eliminate mass inflation under the full nonlinear dynamics.
What would settle it
Numerical evolution of small perturbations in the constructed spacetime that shows no exponential growth of mass near the inner horizon.
Figures
read the original abstract
Mass inflation is a phenomenon happened in the vicinity of inner horizon in two-horizon spacetime. It is shown that the mass of initially small perturbations will grow exponentially as they approach the inner horizon. This implies that black hole inner horizon is unstable to the perturbations. In view of the fact that the mass inflation is determined by the surface gravity of inner horizon, Carballo-Rubio et al. showed that if one makes the surface gravity of inner horizon vanish, then the exponential growth character of mass inflation is not present. Basing on this conclusion, we look for the black hole solutions of multiple horizons with nonlinear Maxwell field. Then we make the inner horizons to coincide with each other such that the surface gravities of every inner horizon vanish. By this way, black holes of multiple horizons without mass inflation are constructed.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper claims to construct black hole solutions with multiple horizons in nonlinear Maxwell theory by arranging for inner horizons to coincide, thereby setting their surface gravities to zero. Invoking the result of Carballo-Rubio et al. that vanishing surface gravity eliminates exponential growth of mass inflation, the authors conclude that these solutions are free of mass inflation.
Significance. If the construction is valid and the linear result extends to the nonlinear regime, the work would provide explicit examples of multi-horizon black holes whose inner horizons are stable against mass inflation. This could be relevant for understanding horizon stability in nonlinear electrodynamics and for constructing regular or stable interior geometries.
major comments (2)
- The abstract states the construction but supplies no explicit metric, field equations, or perturbation analysis; without these details the central claim cannot be checked for derivation gaps or post-hoc choices.
- The paper relies on the prior result that zero surface gravity removes exponential growth (from Carballo-Rubio et al.); however, that reference establishes the result only for linear perturbations. The manuscript provides no nonlinear perturbation analysis, no numerical evolution of the Einstein-nonlinear-Maxwell system, and no explicit check that the mass function remains bounded when the full nonlinear stress-energy is retained near the degenerate horizon.
minor comments (1)
- Notation for the nonlinear Maxwell coupling constants and the explicit form of the stress-energy tensor should be introduced earlier and used consistently when describing the field equations.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will make.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: The abstract states the construction but supplies no explicit metric, field equations, or perturbation analysis; without these details the central claim cannot be checked for derivation gaps or post-hoc choices.
Authors: The abstract is intentionally concise as a summary of the main result. The full manuscript contains the explicit metric ansatz for the multi-horizon spacetime, the nonlinear Maxwell field equations, the procedure for arranging coinciding inner horizons, and the resulting vanishing surface gravities. These are derived in the sections following the introduction. We will revise the abstract to briefly reference the key elements of the construction and the reliance on the surface-gravity condition. revision: yes
-
Referee: The paper relies on the prior result that zero surface gravity removes exponential growth (from Carballo-Rubio et al.); however, that reference establishes the result only for linear perturbations. The manuscript provides no nonlinear perturbation analysis, no numerical evolution of the Einstein-nonlinear-Maxwell system, and no explicit check that the mass function remains bounded when the full nonlinear stress-energy is retained near the degenerate horizon.
Authors: We agree that Carballo-Rubio et al. treat linear perturbations and that our manuscript does not include a dedicated nonlinear perturbation analysis or numerical evolution of the full Einstein-nonlinear-Maxwell system. The central construction ensures that the surface gravity vanishes at the degenerate inner horizons by design, which removes the exponential growth mechanism identified in the linear analysis. We will add a discussion paragraph noting this scope limitation and indicating that a full nonlinear check would be a natural extension for future work. revision: partial
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; explicit solutions constructed to satisfy external zero-surface-gravity condition
full rationale
The paper solves the Einstein-nonlinear-Maxwell equations to obtain explicit metrics admitting multiple horizons, then tunes parameters so that inner horizons coincide and surface gravities vanish at those surfaces. This construction step is independent of the target claim and does not reduce any derived quantity to a fitted input or self-referential definition. The conclusion that mass inflation is absent rests on an external citation to Carballo-Rubio et al. for the linear-perturbation result; that citation is treated as independent support rather than a self-citation chain or ansatz smuggled from the authors' prior work. No load-bearing step equates a prediction to its own inputs by construction.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (1)
- nonlinear Maxwell coupling constants
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Vanishing surface gravity at a degenerate inner horizon eliminates exponential mass inflation
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
By making the inner horizons coincide such that the surface gravities of every inner horizon vanish, black holes of multiple horizons without mass inflation are constructed.
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Taming the Aretakis instability: extremal black holes with multi-degenerate horizons
Black holes with infinitely degenerate horizons are proposed to be stable against Aretakis instability, potentially serving as end states.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
(6) Namely, there is only one freedom of U (r) to be deter- mined. Since the spacetime is static and spherically sym- metric, the four-vector can be assumed as [Aµ ] = [φ (r) , 0, 0, 0] . (7) Here φ corresponds to the Coulomb potential in the Maxwell electrostatics. Let φ = ∫ K (r)dr, (8) we obtain the following independent equations from the Einstein equ...
-
[2]
0164, 0. 085, 0. 546, 1. 44. (40) The seven positive roots correspond to the positions of seven horizons. So we factorize U as follows U = 5∏ α =1 ( 1 + kα r ) 7∏ α =1 ( 1 − hα r ) , (41) with ki and hi positive constants and hi satisfy 0<h 1<h 2<h 3<h 4<h 5<h 6 <h 7. (42) Cvetic et al [36] show that if one regards the Christodoulou and Ruffini formula for ...
-
[3]
However, the energy of classical particle discussed in the above subsection is always positive, i.e. E > 0. Because there are many potential wells, the bound states for particle exist and the discrete energy of particles can be given by the WKB method, ( n + 1 2 ) π = ∫ b a √ 2 (ω − Vef f)dr. (59) Herea andb stand for the transition points. On the other h...
-
[4]
7: Potential barriers coexist with potential wells (on the order of 10 32) in [ h2 , h3]
One-horizon black holes 10 –1 0 1 2 3 4 0.0009 0.001 0.0011 0.0012r FIG. 7: Potential barriers coexist with potential wells (on the order of 10 32) in [ h2 , h3]. We set l = 1,1000,10000. It shows the effect of l on the potential is negligible. –0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.0003 0.00034 0.00038 0.00042r FIG. 8: Potential barriers coexist with potential wells (o...
-
[5]
It is also coming from the three- horizon black holes, Eq
Two-horizon black holes The metric function of two-horizon black holes is given by U = [ 1 + s˜h1 (1 + 2s)r ] ( 1 − ˜h1 r ) 2 ( 1 − s˜h1 r ) ,(73) with ˜h1> 0 and s> 1. It is also coming from the three- horizon black holes, Eq. (33). In this case, we have two horizons. One of them is the outer event horizon and the other is the inner coincident horizon. B...
-
[6]
(74) It has four parameters, M,Q, ¯a3, ¯a4
Two-horizon black holes Now we study the metric function of four-horizon black holes U = 1 − 2M r + Q2 r2 + ¯a3 r4 + ¯a4 r6 . (74) It has four parameters, M,Q, ¯a3, ¯a4. We can factorize it in the form U = ( 1 + ¯k1 r + ¯k2 r2 ) ( 1 − ¯h r ) 3 ( 1 − s¯h r ) . (75) Then we conclude that ¯k1 = (1 + 3s)2 ¯h 3 + 8s2 + 9s , ¯a3 = − ¯h4 ( 3s + 10s3 + 6s2 + 1 ) ...
-
[7]
In this case, the singularity is timelike
One-horizon black holes When ¯h> 0, s = 1 , (79) the inner three horizons and the outer event horizon co- incide also with the vanishing of surface gravity. In this case, the singularity is timelike
-
[8]
(82) In this situation, we are left with two horizons both with the vanishing surface gravity
Two-horizon black holes Finally, we factorize the metric function as follows U = ( 1 + ¯k1 r + ¯k2 r2 ) ( 1 − ¯h1 r ) 2 ( 1 − ¯h2 r ) 2 , (80) and conclude that ¯k1 = 2 ( ¯h1 + ¯ h2 ) ¯ h2¯ h1 ¯h2 2 + 3¯h2¯h1 + ¯h2 1 , ¯k2 = ¯h2 2¯h2 1 ¯h2 2 + 3¯h2¯h1 + ¯h2 1 , M = ( ¯ h1 + ¯h2 ) 3 ¯h2 2 + 3¯h2¯h1 + ¯h2 1 , ¯a4 = ¯h4 2¯h4 1 ¯h2 2 + 3¯h2¯ h1 + ¯h2 1 , Q2 =...
-
[9]
showed that, if we are able to let the surface gravity of inner horizons vanishes, then the exponential growth of mass inflation instability would not happen. It is in- deed the case. In fact, the extreme black holes with two horizons coincident have the vanishing surface gravities such that the mass inflation does not exist. On the other hand, Cai [54] inv...
-
[10]
Israel, Internal structure of black holes
Eric Poisson and W. Israel, Internal structure of black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 41:1796–1809, 1990
work page 1990
-
[11]
Amos Ori, Inner structure of a charged black hole: An ex- act mass-inflation solution. Phys. Rev. Lett., 67:789–792, 1991
work page 1991
-
[12]
Patrick R. Brady and John D. Smith, Black hole singular- ities: A Numerical approach. Phys. Rev. Lett., 75:1256– 1259, 1995
work page 1995
-
[13]
, Regular black holes without mass in- flation instability, JHEP,, 2022, 118, (2022)
Ra´ ul Carballo-Rubio, Francesco Di Filippo, Stefano Liberati et al. , Regular black holes without mass in- flation instability, JHEP,, 2022, 118, (2022)
work page 2022
-
[14]
A. Eichhorn and Pedro G. S. Fernandes, Regular black holes without mass-inflation instability and gravastars from modified gravity, gr-qc: arXiv:2508.00686v1
-
[15]
Matt Visser, Black holes, Cauchy horizons, and mass in- flation, General Relativity and Gravitation, 56:146, 2024
work page 2024
- [16]
-
[17]
C. Gao, Y. Lu, S. Yu, Y. Shen, Black hole and cos- mos with multiple horizons and multiple singularities in vector-tensor theories, Phys. Rev. D 97, 104013 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[18]
Gao, Black holes with many horizons in the theo- ries of nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys
C. Gao, Black holes with many horizons in the theo- ries of nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 104, 064038 (2021)
work page 2021
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
-
[24]
R. G. Cai, D. W. Pang and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 70, 124034 (2004)
work page 2004
-
[25]
R. G. Cai and Y. W. Sun, JHEP. 09, 115 (2008)
work page 2008
-
[26]
S. S. Yazadjiev, Phys. Rev. D 72, 044006 (2005)
work page 2005
-
[27]
D. N. Vollick, Phys. Rev. D 72, 084026 (2005)
work page 2005
-
[28]
Y. S. Myung, Y. W. Kim and Y. J. Park, Phys. Rev. D 78, 044020 (2008)
work page 2008
-
[29]
Y. S. Myung, Y. W. Kim and Y. J. Park, Phys. Rev. D 78, 084002 (2008)
work page 2008
-
[30]
S. H. Mazharimousavi, M. Halilsoy and Z. Amirabi, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064050 (2008)
work page 2008
- [31]
- [32]
- [33]
- [34]
-
[35]
S. H. Mazharimousavi and M. Halilsoy, Phys. Lett. B 681, 190 (2009)
work page 2009
-
[36]
M. H. Dehghani and H. R. Rastegar Sedehi, Phys. Rev. D 74, 124018 (2006)
work page 2006
-
[37]
M. H. Dehghani, S. H. Hendi, A. Sheykhi and H. Raste- gar Sedehi, JCAP 02, 020 (2007)
work page 2007
-
[38]
S. H. Hendi, J. Math. Phys. 49, 082501 (2008)
work page 2008
- [39]
-
[40]
M. H. Dehghani, N. Bostani and S. H. Hendi, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064031 (2008)
work page 2008
-
[41]
M. H. Dehghani, A. Sheykhi and S. H. Hendi, Phys. Lett. B 659, 476 (2008). K. A. Bronnikov, I. G. Dymnikova and E. Galaktionov, Class. Quantum Grav. 29, 095025 (2012)
work page 2008
-
[42]
S. V. Bolokhov, K. A. Bronnikov and M. V. Skvortsova, Class. Quantum Grav. 29, 245006 (2012)
work page 2012
-
[43]
K. A. Bronnikov, K. A. Baleevskikh and M. V. Skvortsova, Phys. Rev. D 96, 124039 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[44]
A. Allahyari, M. Khodadi, S. Vagnozzi and D. F. Mota, JCAP 02, 003 (2020) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2020/02/003 [arXiv:1912.08231 [gr-qc]]
-
[45]
M. Cvetic, G.W. Gibbons, H. Lu, C.N. Pope, Killing Horizons: Negative Temperatures and Entropy Super- Additivity, Phys. Rev. D 98, 106015 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[46]
Z. Zhai and W. Liu, Nernst theorem and Hawking radi- ation from a Reissner-Nordstrom black hole, Astrophys. Space Sci. 325, 63–67 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[47]
E. M. Purcell, R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev. 81, 279 (1951)
work page 1951
-
[48]
A. S. Oja, O. V. Lounasmaa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 1 (1997)
work page 1997
- [49]
-
[50]
G.E. Volovik, Effect of the inner horizon on the black hol e 13 thermodynamics: Reissner–Nordstr¨ om black hole and Kerr black hole, Mod.Phys.Lett.A 36 (2021) 24, 2150177
work page 2021
-
[51]
Curir, Spin entropy of a rotating black hole, II Nuovo Cimento B 52 (1979) 262-266
A. Curir, Spin entropy of a rotating black hole, II Nuovo Cimento B 52 (1979) 262-266
work page 1979
-
[52]
N. F. Ramsey, Thermodynamics and statistical mechan- ics at negative absolute temperatures, Phys. Rep. 103, 20 (1956)
work page 1956
-
[53]
Pound, R.V., A Nuclear Spin System at Negative Temperature, Phys
Purcell, E.M. Pound, R.V., A Nuclear Spin System at Negative Temperature, Phys. Rev., 81 , pp. 279-280, 1951
work page 1951
-
[54]
Negative temperatures and the definition of entropy
Swendsen, R.H. Wang, J.S., Negative Tem- peratures and the Definition of Entropy, http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.4619, (12 October 2015)
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[55]
Gibbs, Boltzmann, and negative temperatures
Frenkel, D. Warren, P.B., Gibbs, Boltzmann, and Nega- tive Temperatures, http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.4299, (17 July 2014)
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
- [56]
-
[57]
M. Cvetic, G.W. Gibbons, D. Kubiznak, C.N. Pope, Black hole enthalpy and an entropy inequality for the thermodynamic volume. Phys. Rev. D 84, 024037 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[58]
Y. Tiandho, Implication of Negative Temperature in the Inner Horizon of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Hole, J. Math. Fund. Sci., 49, 294(2017)
work page 2017
-
[59]
S. Q. Wu, The Conformal Version of Black Hole, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0411002
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[60]
Braun et al., Negative absolute temperature for mo- tional degrees of dreedom, Science, 52,339(2013)
S. Braun et al., Negative absolute temperature for mo- tional degrees of dreedom, Science, 52,339(2013)
work page 2013
-
[61]
Moncrief, Stability of Reissner-Nordstrom black ho les, Phys
V. Moncrief, Stability of Reissner-Nordstrom black ho les, Phys. Phys. Rev. D 10, 1057 (1974)
work page 1974
- [62]
- [63]
- [64]
-
[65]
Roberto Casadio, Octavian Micu and Dejan Stojkovic, JHEP. 05, 096 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[66]
Roberto Casadio, Andrea Giugn , Andrea Giusti, Octa- vian Micu, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 5 (2017)
work page 2017
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.