REVIEW 3 cited by
Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) require sophisticated prompting, yet current practices face challenges in structure, data integration, format sensitivity, and tooling. Existing methods lack comprehensive solutions for organizing complex prompts involving diverse data types (documents, tables, images) or managing presentation variations systematically. To address these gaps, we introduce POML (Prompt Orchestration Markup Language). POML employs component-based markup for logical structure (roles, tasks, examples), specialized tags for seamless data integration, and a CSS-like styling system to decouple content from presentation, reducing formatting sensitivity. It includes templating for dynamic prompts and a comprehensive developer toolkit (IDE support, SDKs) to improve version control and collaboration. We validate POML through two case studies demonstrating its impact on complex application integration (PomLink) and accuracy performance (TableQA), as well as a user study assessing its effectiveness in real-world development scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
A Language for Describing Agentic LLM Contexts
ACDL is a language for specifying the structure and dynamics of LLM input contexts in agent systems using constructs for roles, dynamic content, time references, and conditional structures.
-
A Prompt-Aware Structuring Framework for Reliable Reuse of AI-Generated Content in the Agentic Web
A framework structures AI-generated content with prompt-aware metadata and verifiable credentials to support reliable assessment and reuse by agents.
-
When the Code Autopilot Breaks: Why LLMs Falter in Embedded Machine Learning
LLM-based sketch generation for embedded ML is fragile, with success rates below 40%, and prompt structure alone can swing outcomes from 15% to 30%.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.