pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.16363 · v3 · submitted 2025-08-22 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· hep-lat

Infinite matrix product states for (1+1)-dimensional gauge theories

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 21:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-lat
keywords matrix product statesmatrix product operatorslattice gauge theoriesSchwinger modelinfinite latticesgauge symmetrytensor networksHamiltonian formulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A link-enhanced matrix product operator construction represents gauge theory lattice Hamiltonians locally and with manifest translation invariance on infinite lattices.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a matrix product operator approach for one-plus-one dimensional gauge theories that keeps the Hamiltonians local while preserving translation invariance. It relies on symmetric matrix product states paired with link-enhanced matrix product operators that act on both physical and virtual degrees of freedom. This setup is needed because standard tensor-network methods have been restricted to finite lattices where boundary effects distort physical results. The construction applies to abelian and non-abelian groups alike and is shown explicitly for the massless and massive Schwinger model plus adjoint QCD in two dimensions.

Core claim

The central claim is that symmetric matrix product states together with link-enhanced matrix product operators (LEMPOs) can represent the lattice Hamiltonians of abelian or non-abelian gauge theories in a form that is both local and manifestly translation-invariant, thereby allowing Hamiltonian studies on infinite lattices without boundary artifacts.

What carries the argument

Link-enhanced matrix product operators (LEMPOs) that act simultaneously on the physical and virtual spaces of symmetric matrix product states while preserving gauge symmetry and locality.

If this is right

  • The construction directly implements the massless and massive one-flavor Schwinger model.
  • It extends to adjoint QCD in two dimensions.
  • Hamiltonian lattice gauge theories become accessible on infinite lattices.
  • The resulting operators remain local and manifestly translation-invariant for any gauge group treated.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Ground-state and spectral calculations could be performed directly in the infinite-volume limit, removing the need for finite-size extrapolations.
  • The same operator structure might support real-time evolution studies of gauge-theory dynamics once combined with time-evolution algorithms.
  • Similar link-enhancement ideas could be tested in higher-dimensional lattice models where translation invariance is harder to maintain.

Load-bearing premise

Link-enhanced matrix product operators can be constructed to act simultaneously on physical and virtual spaces while preserving the required gauge symmetry and locality for arbitrary gauge groups.

What would settle it

An explicit counterexample showing that no local, gauge-symmetric LEMPO exists for the Hamiltonian of a chosen non-abelian gauge theory on an infinite lattice.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.16363 by Anna-Maria E. Gl\"uck, Benjamin T. S{\o}gaard, Ross Dempsey, Silviu S. Pufu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The spatial arrangement of the degrees of freedom in the Schwinger model Hamil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The lattice strong-coupling expansions ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Precision lattice estimates of the lightest particle mass and the chiral condensate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The spectrum of the Schwinger model as a function of the electron mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The energy density difference ∆ε(m, θ) in the Schwinger model, defined in (3.6). The black dashed line is the weak-coupling expression (3.8) for θ = π. The lattice data also agrees well with the weak-coupling expansion at other values of θ, as well as the small-mass expansion (3.7), but we do not show these approximations in this figure in order to avoid clutter. for −π ≤ θ ≤ π; this formula can be extende… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Zero-temperature phase diagram of the flux tube sectors of the SU(2) and SU(3) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The low-lying spectrum of SU(2) adjoint QCD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The fundamental string tension in the SU(2) and SU(3) theories. The blue dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The chiral condensate and the lowest fermion mass for the SU(2) and SU(3) theories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The low-lying spectrum of SU(3) adjoint QCD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The contraction pattern in generalized MPS (a) and PEPS (b) for lattice gauge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a matrix product operator construction that allows us to represent the lattice Hamiltonians of (abelian or non-abelian) gauge theories in a local and manifestly translation-invariant form. In particular, we use symmetric matrix product states and introduce link-enhanced matrix product operators (LEMPOs) that can act on both the physical and virtual spaces of the matrix product states. This construction allows us to study Hamiltonian lattice gauge theories on infinite lattices. As examples, we show how to implement this method to study the massless and massive one-flavor Schwinger model and adjoint QCD$_2$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces link-enhanced matrix product operators (LEMPOs) that act jointly on the physical (matter and gauge) and virtual indices of symmetric matrix product states. This construction is claimed to represent the lattice Hamiltonians of (1+1)-dimensional abelian and non-abelian gauge theories in a strictly local and manifestly translation-invariant form, thereby enabling Hamiltonian studies on infinite lattices. Explicit implementations are presented for the massless and massive one-flavor Schwinger model (U(1)) and for adjoint QCD2.

Significance. If the LEMPO construction is shown to preserve exact gauge invariance and locality for arbitrary groups, the method would provide a valuable tool for tensor-network studies of (1+1)D gauge theories in the infinite-volume limit, removing finite-size artifacts that complicate continuum extrapolations. The explicit treatment of both abelian and non-abelian cases, together with the use of symmetric MPS, strengthens the potential applicability to models with confinement and chiral symmetry breaking.

major comments (2)
  1. [LEMPO construction for non-abelian groups (around the definition of the enhanced link operators)] The central claim that LEMPOs can be defined to act simultaneously on physical and virtual spaces while exactly preserving gauge symmetry and strict locality for arbitrary (including non-abelian) gauge groups is load-bearing. The provided Schwinger-model example is abelian and therefore does not test the required closure of virtual indices under irreducible representations when the enhanced link operators act jointly with the non-abelian gauge action. An explicit algebraic verification or projector construction that guarantees this closure without introducing non-local virtual contractions is needed.
  2. [Numerical results and symmetry checks for adjoint QCD2] In the adjoint QCD2 implementation, the numerical convergence data and explicit checks that the infinite-lattice ground state remains exactly gauge-invariant under the full non-abelian group action are not sufficient to confirm that the virtual-space representation closes properly. Any residual gauge violation or effective non-locality would undermine the translation-invariant infinite-lattice claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and definitions] Notation for the virtual indices and the precise embedding of the group representations into the MPO tensors should be clarified with an explicit example for a small non-abelian group (e.g., SU(2)).
  2. [Discussion] A short comparison table of computational cost versus conventional finite-lattice MPS or DMRG would help readers assess the practical advantage of the infinite-lattice formulation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of the LEMPO construction. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [LEMPO construction for non-abelian groups (around the definition of the enhanced link operators)] The central claim that LEMPOs can be defined to act simultaneously on physical and virtual spaces while exactly preserving gauge symmetry and strict locality for arbitrary (including non-abelian) gauge groups is load-bearing. The provided Schwinger-model example is abelian and therefore does not test the required closure of virtual indices under irreducible representations when the enhanced link operators act jointly with the non-abelian gauge action. An explicit algebraic verification or projector construction that guarantees this closure without introducing non-local virtual contractions is needed.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit algebraic verification strengthens the claim for non-abelian groups. The general LEMPO construction in the manuscript is formulated using the representation theory of the gauge group, with enhanced link operators defined via intertwiners that map between physical and virtual spaces while preserving invariance. To address the referee's concern directly, the revised manuscript will include an explicit algebraic verification for the SU(2) adjoint case, showing closure of the virtual indices under the group action via projectors without non-local contractions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical results and symmetry checks for adjoint QCD2] In the adjoint QCD2 implementation, the numerical convergence data and explicit checks that the infinite-lattice ground state remains exactly gauge-invariant under the full non-abelian group action are not sufficient to confirm that the virtual-space representation closes properly. Any residual gauge violation or effective non-locality would undermine the translation-invariant infinite-lattice claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that additional explicit checks would be useful to confirm the closure property. The current numerical results already demonstrate gauge invariance to machine precision due to the use of symmetric MPS combined with LEMPOs. In the revised manuscript we will augment the adjoint QCD2 section with further data on gauge-invariance residuals across system sizes and an explanation of how the virtual representation is guaranteed to close by the projector structure of the LEMPOs. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

New LEMPO construction for gauge-theory Hamiltonians is a self-contained operator definition

full rationale

The paper introduces link-enhanced matrix product operators (LEMPOs) as a novel construction to represent lattice Hamiltonians in a local, translation-invariant manner for both abelian and non-abelian gauge theories. This is presented directly as a definitional method acting on physical and virtual spaces of symmetric MPS, without any equations that reduce the claimed representation to a fitted parameter, prior result by the same authors, or self-referential input. The Schwinger-model and adjoint QCD2 examples are applications of the construction rather than validations that force the result by construction. No load-bearing derivation step collapses to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method relies on standard properties of matrix product states and gauge symmetry but introduces no new fitted parameters or invented particles in the abstract description.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Gauge symmetry must be preserved by the link-enhanced operators acting on both physical and virtual indices.
    Invoked when the authors state that the construction works for abelian or non-abelian gauge theories while maintaining manifest translation invariance.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5641 in / 1267 out tokens · 31673 ms · 2026-05-18T21:46:35.235179+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The two-flavor Schwinger model at 50: Solving Coleman's puzzles

    hep-th 2026-05 accept novelty 8.0

    Coleman's puzzles are solved: at θ=π with equal masses the model shows spontaneous charge conjugation breaking and no confinement with mass gap ~m exp(-0.111 g²/m²) at strong coupling; at θ=0 a level crossing occurs b...

  2. Quantum dynamics of cosmological particle production: interacting quantum field theories with matrix product states

    hep-th 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Self-interactions in scalar and gauge theories suppress gravitational particle production in a quench modeling cosmic expansion, as computed with tensor networks.

  3. Real-time Scattering in \phi^4 Theory using Matrix Product States

    hep-th 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    uMPS simulations of φ⁴ theory in 1+1 dimensions extract elastic scattering probabilities and time delays that diverge near the critical point, serving as a dynamical signature of the quantum phase transition.

  4. Dense $\mathrm{QC_2D_2}$ with uniform matrix product states

    hep-lat 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Uniform MPS simulations of dense 1+1D SU(2) gauge theory find Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid infrared behavior with central charge 1, density modulations at the predicted wavenumber, and a smooth crossover in the Luttinger...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 43 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Schwinger, Gauge Invariance and Mass

    J.S. Schwinger, Gauge Invariance and Mass. 2. , Phys. Rev. 128 (1962) 2425

  2. [2]

    String Spectrum of 1+1-Dimensional Large N QCD with Adjoint Matter

    S. Dalley and I.R. Klebanov, String spectrum of (1+1)-dimensional large N QCD with adjoint matter , Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 2517 [ hep-th/9209049]

  3. [3]

    Kogut and L

    J.B. Kogut and L. Susskind, Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson’s Lattice Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 395

  4. [4]

    Wilson, Confinement of Quarks , Phys

    K.G. Wilson, Confinement of Quarks , Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 2445

  5. [5]

    Bauer et al

    C.W. Bauer et al., Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics , PRX Quantum 4 (2023) 027001 [ 2204.03381]

  6. [6]

    Di Meglio et al., Quantum Computing for High-Energy Physics: State of the Art and Challenges , PRX Quantum 5 (2024) 037001 [ 2307.03236]

    A. Di Meglio et al., Quantum Computing for High-Energy Physics: State of the Art and Challenges , PRX Quantum 5 (2024) 037001 [ 2307.03236]

  7. [7]

    Towards overcoming the Monte Carlo sign problem with tensor networks

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, J.I. Cirac, K. Jansen, S. K¨ uhn and H. Saito,Towards overcoming the Monte Carlo sign problem with tensor networks , EPJ Web Conf. 137 (2017) 04001 [ 1611.04791]

  8. [8]

    Density Induced Phase Transitions in the Schwinger Model: A Study with Matrix Product States

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, J.I. Cirac, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn,Density Induced Phase Transitions in the Schwinger Model: A Study with Matrix Product States , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 071601 [ 1611.00705]

  9. [9]

    The multi-flavor Schwinger model with chemical potential - Overcoming the sign problem with Matrix Product States

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, J.I. Cirac, K. Jansen, S. K¨ uhn and H. Saito,The multi-flavor Schwinger model with chemical potential - Overcoming the sign problem with Matrix Product States, PoS LATTICE2016 (2016) 316 [ 1611.01458]

  10. [10]

    The mass spectrum of the Schwinger model with Matrix Product States

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, K. Jansen and J.I. Cirac,The mass spectrum of the Schwinger model with Matrix Product States , JHEP 11 (2013) 158 [ 1305.3765]

  11. [11]

    Matrix product states for gauge field theories

    B. Buyens, J. Haegeman, K. Van Acoleyen, H. Verschelde and F. Verstraete, Matrix product states for gauge field theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 091601 [1312.6654]. 52

  12. [12]

    Real-time Dynamics in U(1) Lattice Gauge Theories with Tensor Networks

    T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Zoller and S. Montangero, Real-time Dynamics in U(1) Lattice Gauge Theories with Tensor Networks , Phys. Rev. X 6 (2016) 011023 [1505.04440]

  13. [13]

    Confinement and string breaking for QED$_2$ in the Hamiltonian picture

    B. Buyens, J. Haegeman, H. Verschelde, F. Verstraete and K. Van Acoleyen, Confinement and string breaking for QED 2 in the Hamiltonian picture , Phys. Rev. X 6 (2016) 041040 [ 1509.00246]

  14. [14]

    Real-time simulation of the Schwinger effect with Matrix Product States

    B. Buyens, J. Haegeman, F. Hebenstreit, F. Verstraete and K. Van Acoleyen, Real-time simulation of the Schwinger effect with Matrix Product States , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 114501 [ 1612.00739]

  15. [15]

    Flux unwinding in the lattice Schwinger model

    C. Nagele, J.E. Cejudo, T. Byrnes and M. Kleban, Flux unwinding in the lattice Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 094501 [ 1811.03096]

  16. [16]

    Dempsey, I

    R. Dempsey, I.R. Klebanov, S.S. Pufu and B. Zan, Discrete chiral symmetry and mass shift in the lattice Hamiltonian approach to the Schwinger model , Phys. Rev. Res. 4 (2022) 043133 [ 2206.05308]

  17. [17]

    Dempsey, I.R

    R. Dempsey, I.R. Klebanov, S.S. Pufu and B.T. Søgaard, Lattice Hamiltonian for adjoint QCD 2, JHEP 08 (2024) 009 [ 2311.09334]

  18. [18]

    Dempsey, S.S

    R. Dempsey, S.S. Pufu, B.T. Søgaard and I.R. Klebanov, More About the Lattice Hamiltonian for Adjoint QCD 2, 2409.19164

  19. [19]

    Ba˜ nuls, K

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, J.I. Cirac, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn,Tensor Networks and their use for Lattice Gauge Theories , PoS LATTICE2018 (2018) 022 [ 1810.12838]

  20. [20]

    Ba˜ nuls and K

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls and K. Cichy,Review on Novel Methods for Lattice Gauge Theories , Rept. Prog. Phys. 83 (2020) 024401 [ 1910.00257]

  21. [21]

    Ba˜ nuls et al.,Simulating Lattice Gauge Theories within Quantum Technologies , Eur

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls et al.,Simulating Lattice Gauge Theories within Quantum Technologies , Eur. Phys. J. D 74 (2020) 165 [ 1911.00003]

  22. [22]

    Meurice, R

    Y. Meurice, R. Sakai and J. Unmuth-Yockey, Tensor lattice field theory for renormalization and quantum computing , Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (2022) 025005 [2010.06539]

  23. [23]

    Meurice, J.C

    Y. Meurice, J.C. Osborn, R. Sakai, J. Unmuth-Yockey, S. Catterall and R.D. Somma, Tensor networks for High Energy Physics: contribution to Snowmass 2021 , in Snowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [ 2203.04902]. 53

  24. [24]

    Or ´us, Tensor networks for complex quantum systems, Nat

    R. Or´ us,Tensor networks for complex quantum systems , APS Physics 1 (2019) 538 [1812.04011]

  25. [25]

    Ba˜ nuls,Tensor Network Algorithms: A Route Map , Ann

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls,Tensor Network Algorithms: A Route Map , Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 14 (2023) 173 [ 2205.10345]

  26. [26]

    Okunishi, T

    K. Okunishi, T. Nishino and H. Ueda, Developments in the Tensor Network — from Statistical Mechanics to Quantum Entanglement , J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 91 (2022) 062001 [2111.12223]

  27. [27]

    White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups , Phys

    S.R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups , Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2863

  28. [28]

    White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups , Phys

    S.R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups , Phys. Rev. B 48 (1993) 10345

  29. [29]

    The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states

    U. Schollwoeck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals Phys. 326 (2011) 96 [ 1008.3477]

  30. [30]

    Thermodynamic limit of the density matrix renormalization for the spin-1 Heisenberg chain

    S. Ostlund and S. Rommer, Thermodynamic Limit of Density Matrix Renormalization for the spin-1 heisenberg chain , Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 3537 [cond-mat/9503107]

  31. [31]

    Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension

    G. Vidal, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 070201 [ cond-mat/0605597]

  32. [32]

    Infinite size density matrix renormalization group, revisited

    I.P. McCulloch, Infinite size density matrix renormalization group, revisited , 0804.2509

  33. [33]

    Variational optimization algorithms for uniform matrix product states

    V. Zauner-Stauber, L. Vanderstraeten, M.T. Fishman, F. Verstraete and J. Haegeman, Variational optimization algorithms for uniform matrix product states , Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 045145 [ 1701.07035]

  34. [34]

    P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, M.M

    D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, M.M. Wolf, M. Sanz, F. Verstraete and J.I. Cirac,String Order and Symmetries in Quantum Spin Lattices , Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 167202

  35. [35]

    Sanz, M.M

    M. Sanz, M.M. Wolf, D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa and J.I. Cirac,Matrix product states: Symmetries and two-body Hamiltonians , Phys. Rev. A 79 (2009) 042308. 54

  36. [36]

    Density Matrix Renormalization Group Approach to the Massive Schwinger Model

    T. Byrnes, P. Sriganesh, R.J. Bursill and C.J. Hamer, Density matrix renormalization group approach to the massive Schwinger model , Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 109 (2002) 202 [ hep-lat/0201007]

  37. [37]

    Thermal evolution of the Schwinger model with Matrix Product Operators

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, J.I. Cirac, K. Jansen and H. Saito, Thermal evolution of the Schwinger model with Matrix Product Operators , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 034519 [1505.00279]

  38. [38]

    Chiral condensate in the Schwinger model with Matrix Product Operators

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, K. Jansen and H. Saito,Chiral condensate in the Schwinger model with Matrix Product Operators , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 094512 [ 1603.05002]

  39. [39]

    Funcke, K

    L. Funcke, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn,Topological vacuum structure of the Schwinger model with matrix product states , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 054507 [ 1908.00551]

  40. [40]

    Papaefstathiou, D

    I. Papaefstathiou, D. Robaina, J.I. Cirac and M.C. Ba˜ nuls, Density of states of the lattice Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 014514 [ 2104.08170]

  41. [41]

    Honda, E

    M. Honda, E. Itou and Y. Tanizaki, DMRG study of the higher-charge Schwinger model and its ’t Hooft anomaly , JHEP 11 (2022) 141 [ 2210.04237]

  42. [42]

    Funcke, K

    L. Funcke, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn,Exploring the CP-violating Dashen phase in the Schwinger model with tensor networks , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 014504 [2303.03799]

  43. [43]

    Dempsey, I

    R. Dempsey, I.R. Klebanov, S.S. Pufu, B.T. Søgaard and B. Zan, Phase Diagram of the Two-Flavor Schwinger Model at Zero Temperature , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 031603 [2305.04437]

  44. [44]

    Angelides, L

    T. Angelides, L. Funcke, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn,Computing the mass shift of Wilson and staggered fermions in the lattice Schwinger model with matrix product states , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 014516 [ 2303.11016]

  45. [45]

    Arguello Cruz, G

    E. Arguello Cruz, G. Tarnopolsky and Y. Xin, Precision study of the massive Schwinger model near quantum criticality , 2412.01902

  46. [46]

    E. Itou, A. Matsumoto and Y. Tanizaki, DMRG study of the theta-dependent mass spectrum in the 2-flavor Schwinger model , JHEP 09 (2024) 155 [ 2407.11391]

  47. [47]

    Papaefstathiou, J

    I. Papaefstathiou, J. Knolle and M.C. Ba˜ nuls,Real-time scattering in the lattice Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 014504 [ 2402.18429]. 55

  48. [48]

    Godfrey and I.P

    N. Godfrey and I.P. McCulloch, Matrix Product Operator Constructions for Gauge Theories in the Thermodynamic Limit , 2508.14145

  49. [49]

    Horn, Finite Matrix Models With Continuous Local Gauge Invariance , Phys

    D. Horn, Finite Matrix Models With Continuous Local Gauge Invariance , Phys. Lett. B 100 (1981) 149

  50. [50]

    Orland and D

    P. Orland and D. Rohrlich, Lattice Gauge Magnets: Local Isospin From Spin , Nucl. Phys. B 338 (1990) 647

  51. [51]

    Quantum Link Models: A Discrete Approach to Gauge Theories

    S. Chandrasekharan and U.J. Wiese, Quantum link models: A Discrete approach to gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 492 (1997) 455 [ hep-lat/9609042]

  52. [52]

    E. Rico, T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, P. Zoller and S. Montangero, Tensor networks for Lattice Gauge Theories and Atomic Quantum Simulation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 201601 [ 1312.3127]

  53. [53]

    Lattice Gauge Tensor Networks

    P. Silvi, E. Rico, T. Calarco and S. Montangero, Lattice Gauge Tensor Networks, New J. Phys. 16 (2014) 103015 [ 1404.7439]

  54. [54]

    Tensor Networks for Lattice Gauge Theories with continuous groups

    L. Tagliacozzo, A. Celi and M. Lewenstein, Tensor Networks for Lattice Gauge Theories with continuous groups , Phys. Rev. X 4 (2014) 041024 [ 1405.4811]

  55. [55]

    Finite-representation approximation of lattice gauge theories at the continuum limit with tensor networks

    B. Buyens, S. Montangero, J. Haegeman, F. Verstraete and K. Van Acoleyen, Finite-representation approximation of lattice gauge theories at the continuum limit with tensor networks , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 094509 [ 1702.08838]

  56. [56]

    Fujii, K

    H. Fujii, K. Fujikura, Y. Kikukawa, T. Okuda and J.W. Pedersen, Critical behavior of the Schwinger model via gauge-invariant variational uniform matrix product states , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 094505 [ 2412.03569]

  57. [57]

    Building Projected Entangled Pair States with a Local Gauge Symmetry

    E. Zohar and M. Burrello, Building Projected Entangled Pair States with a Local Gauge Symmetry, New J. Phys. 18 (2016) 043008 [ 1511.08426]

  58. [58]

    Efficient Basis Formulation for (1+1)-Dimensional SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory: Spectral calculations with matrix product states

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, J.I. Cirac, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn,Efficient basis formulation for 1+1 dimensional SU(2) lattice gauge theory: Spectral calculations with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. X 7 (2017) 041046 [ 1707.06434]

  59. [59]

    Silvi, Y

    P. Silvi, Y. Sauer, F. Tschirsich and S. Montangero, Tensor network simulation of an SU(3) lattice gauge theory in 1D , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 074512 [ 1901.04403]. 56

  60. [60]

    Cataldi, G

    G. Cataldi, G. Magnifico, P. Silvi and S. Montangero, Simulating (2+1)D SU(2) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory at finite density with tensor networks , Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) 033057 [ 2307.09396]

  61. [61]

    Van Damme, L

    M. Van Damme, L. Devos and J. Haegeman, MPSKit.jl, 2025. 10.5281/zenodo.10654901

  62. [62]

    Haegeman, S

    J. Haegeman, S. Michalakis, B. Nachtergaele, T.J. Osborne, N. Schuch and F. Verstraete, Elementary excitations in gapped quantum spin systems , Physical Review Letters 111 (2013)

  63. [63]

    Banks, L

    T. Banks, L. Susskind and J.B. Kogut, Strong Coupling Calculations of Lattice Gauge Theories: (1+1)-Dimensional Exercises , Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 1043

  64. [64]

    Series Expansions for the Massive Schwinger Model in Hamiltonian lattice theory

    C.J. Hamer, W.-h. Zheng and J. Oitmaa, Series expansions for the massive Schwinger model in Hamiltonian lattice theory , Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 55 [ hep-lat/9701015]

  65. [65]

    Chiral Symmetry Breaking on the Lattice: a Study of the Strongly Coupled Lattice Schwinger Model

    F. Berruto, G. Grignani, G.W. Semenoff and P. Sodano, Chiral symmetry breaking on the lattice: A Study of the strongly coupled lattice Schwinger model , Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 5070 [ hep-lat/9710066]

  66. [66]

    Coleman, More About the Massive Schwinger Model , Annals Phys

    S.R. Coleman, More About the Massive Schwinger Model , Annals Phys. 101 (1976) 239

  67. [67]

    The Spectrum of a Large N Gauge Theory Near Transition from Confinement to Screening

    D.J. Gross, A. Hashimoto and I.R. Klebanov, The Spectrum of a large N gauge theory near transition from confinement to screening , Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 6420 [hep-th/9710240]

  68. [68]

    Komargodski, K

    Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, K. Roumpedakis and S. Seifnashri, Symmetries and strings of adjoint QCD 2, JHEP 03 (2021) 103 [ 2008.07567]

  69. [69]

    Kutasov, Two-dimensional QCD coupled to adjoint matter and string theory ,

    D. Kutasov, Two-dimensional QCD coupled to adjoint matter and string theory ,

  70. [70]

    Symmetries and Mass Splittings in QCD$_2$ Coupled to Adjoint Fermions

    J. Boorstein and D. Kutasov, Symmetries and mass splittings in QCD in two-dimensions coupled to adjoint fermions , Nucl. Phys. B 421 (1994) 263 [hep-th/9401044]

  71. [71]

    Popov, Supersymmetry in QCD2 coupled to fermions , Phys

    F.K. Popov, Supersymmetry in QCD2 coupled to fermions , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 074005 [2202.04017]. 57

  72. [72]

    Klebanov, S.S

    I.R. Klebanov, S.S. Pufu, B. Søgaard and E. Witten, Supercurrents and (Partial) Supersymmetry in Adjoint QCD 2 and Its Generalizations , 2507.17138

  73. [73]

    Lowenstein and J.A

    J.H. Lowenstein and J.A. Swieca, Quantum electrodynamics in two-dimensions , Annals Phys. 68 (1971) 172

  74. [74]

    Casher, J.B

    A. Casher, J.B. Kogut and L. Susskind, Vacuum polarization and the absence of free quarks, Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 732

  75. [75]

    Coleman, R

    S.R. Coleman, R. Jackiw and L. Susskind, Charge Shielding and Quark Confinement in the Massive Schwinger Model , Annals Phys. 93 (1975) 267

  76. [76]

    Potvin, A nonperturbative study of hadronization with heavy sources

    J. Potvin, A nonperturbative study of hadronization with heavy sources. 1. the screening length as a function of the qaurk mass in the schwinger model , Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 2070

  77. [77]

    Matrix Product State Representations

    D. Perez-Garcia, F. Verstraete, M.M. Wolf and J.I. Cirac, Matrix product state representations, Quant. Inf. Comput. 7 (2007) 401 [ quant-ph/0608197]

  78. [78]

    Hastings, Solving gapped Hamiltonians locally , Phys

    M.B. Hastings, Solving gapped Hamiltonians locally , Phys. Rev. B 73 (2006) 085115

  79. [79]

    Verstraete and J.I

    F. Verstraete and J.I. Cirac, Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully , Phys. Rev. B 73 (2006) 094423

  80. [80]

    McCulloch, From density-matrix renormalization group to matrix product states , J

    I.P. McCulloch, From density-matrix renormalization group to matrix product states , J. Phys. A 2007 (2007) P10014

Showing first 80 references.