Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Generative AI for Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.19882 v1 pith:Z7GHS77A submitted 2025-08-27 cs.SE cs.AI

Generative AI for Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems: A Survey

classification cs.SE cs.AI
keywords testingdrivinggenerativeautonomousdiverseresearchsurveysystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Autonomous driving systems (ADS) have been an active area of research, with the potential to deliver significant benefits to society. However, before large-scale deployment on public roads, extensive testing is necessary to validate their functionality and safety under diverse driving conditions. Therefore, different testing approaches are required, and achieving effective and efficient testing of ADS remains an open challenge. Recently, generative AI has emerged as a powerful tool across many domains, and it is increasingly being applied to ADS testing due to its ability to interpret context, reason about complex tasks, and generate diverse outputs. To gain a deeper understanding of its role in ADS testing, we systematically analyzed 91 relevant studies and synthesized their findings into six major application categories, primarily centered on scenario-based testing of ADS. We also reviewed their effectiveness and compiled a wide range of datasets, simulators, ADS, metrics, and benchmarks used for evaluation, while identifying 27 limitations. This survey provides an overview and practical insights into the use of generative AI for testing ADS, highlights existing challenges, and outlines directions for future research in this rapidly evolving field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. In the Driver's Seat: A Multi-Company Study on the Reality of Autonomous Driving System Testing

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Industry ADS testing is scenario-based and X-in-the-loop, lacks agreed acceptance criteria and realistic scenario coverage, and a nine-company interview study synthesizes this into an evidence-centered closed-loop framework.

  2. From Research to Practice: An Interactive Rapid Review of Autonomous Driving System Testing in Industry

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Industry practitioners identified 12 ADS testing challenges, prioritized two for end-to-end systems, and found that most of the 17 examined research studies lack direct applicability to real industrial contexts.

  3. Search-Based Software Engineering and AI Foundation Models: Current Landscape and Future Roadmap

    cs.SE 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A research roadmap analyzing the current state of search-based software engineering with foundation models, outlining challenges and directions across three integration aspects.