pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.01703 · v5 · submitted 2025-09-01 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

The N³LO Twist-2 Matching of Linearly Polarized Gluon TMDs

Yu Jiao Zhu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 19:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords TMDgluonlinear polarizationN3LOmatchingQCDsmall-x resummationEIC
0
0 comments X

The pith

The twist-2 matching for linearly polarized gluon TMDs reaches N³LO in perturbative QCD

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the matching coefficients that connect the transverse-momentum-dependent linearly polarized gluon parton distribution functions and fragmentation functions to their collinear counterparts at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD. It also includes next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic resummation in the small-x region specifically for the fragmentation functions. These computations deliver the high-precision theoretical tools required for analyzing gluon distributions inside hadrons using data from high-energy scattering experiments. If accurate, they will enable more reliable extractions of the three-dimensional structure of the proton and other hadrons at facilities such as the Electron-Ion Collider.

Core claim

We compute the twist-2 matching of the transverse-momentum-dependent linearly polarized gluon parton distribution and fragmentation functions at N³LO in QCD, supplemented by NNLL small-x resummation for the gluon TMD fragmentation functions. These results provide high-precision fixed-order and resummed inputs to TMD phenomenology for studies of hadron spin structure and tomography at the EIC.

What carries the argument

The perturbative matching coefficients at N³LO that express the TMD linearly polarized gluon functions in terms of collinear gluon distributions, including the small-x resummed contributions for fragmentation functions.

If this is right

  • Predictions for observables involving linearly polarized gluons can be made with reduced perturbative uncertainty at N³LO.
  • The small-x resummation improves the description of gluon TMD fragmentation at low momentum fractions.
  • These coefficients serve as essential inputs for global analyses of TMD data from future colliders.
  • Consistency checks with lower-order results and known limits validate the calculation framework.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar N³LO calculations could be extended to other gluon TMDs or to quark TMDs for a complete set.
  • The results may help in probing gluon saturation effects when combined with small-x evolution equations.
  • Application to phenomenological studies could reveal the importance of linear polarization in unpolarized hadron collisions.

Load-bearing premise

The TMD factorization theorem applies to the processes considered and all infrared divergences cancel appropriately in the N³LO matching without significant non-perturbative corrections.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of the computed N³LO coefficients with independent lattice QCD evaluations of the same matching relations at accessible scales would confirm or refute the result if they disagree beyond uncertainties.

read the original abstract

We compute the twist-2 matching of the transverse-momentum-dependent (TMD) linearly polarized gluon parton distribution and fragmentation functions at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order (N$^3$LO) in QCD, supplemented by next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic (NNLL) small-$x$ resummation for the gluon TMD fragmentation functions. These results provide high-precision fixed-order and resummed inputs to TMD phenomenology, and constitute essential theoretical ingredients for future studies of the spin structure and three-dimensional tomography of hadrons at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the N³LO twist-2 matching coefficients of the linearly polarized gluon TMD parton distribution and fragmentation functions onto collinear PDFs and FFs in QCD, supplemented by NNLL small-x resummation for the fragmentation functions. These results are presented as high-precision inputs for TMD phenomenology at the EIC.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies essential higher-order perturbative ingredients that advance the precision of gluon TMD analyses, particularly for spin-dependent observables and three-dimensional hadron tomography. The combination of fixed-order N³LO matching with resummed small-x contributions strengthens applicability across kinematic regimes.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (28)] §4.1, Eq. (28): the explicit cancellation of infrared and rapidity poles at N³LO for the linearly polarized gluon case is asserted but the manuscript does not tabulate the diagram count or show the separate real and virtual contributions that cancel the 1/ε² and 1/ε terms; without this verification the finite matching coefficient cannot be confirmed to be free of residual divergences.
  2. [§5.2] §5.2: the NNLL small-x resummation for the fragmentation function is matched to the N³LO fixed-order result, yet the consistency of the logarithmic terms between the two is not demonstrated by an explicit expansion; this is load-bearing for the combined prediction claimed in the abstract.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Eq. (7)] The notation for the linearly polarized gluon TMD operator in Eq. (7) uses an unconventional tensor decomposition; a brief comparison to the standard definition in the literature would improve readability.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1 lists the N³LO coefficients but omits the numerical values of the color factors for the finite terms; adding these would facilitate cross-checks by readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.1, Eq. (28)] §4.1, Eq. (28): the explicit cancellation of infrared and rapidity poles at N³LO for the linearly polarized gluon case is asserted but the manuscript does not tabulate the diagram count or show the separate real and virtual contributions that cancel the 1/ε² and 1/ε terms; without this verification the finite matching coefficient cannot be confirmed to be free of residual divergences.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the pole cancellation improves transparency. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that tabulates the diagram counts at N³LO and displays the separate real and virtual contributions to the 1/ε² and 1/ε poles, explicitly demonstrating their cancellation for the linearly polarized gluon TMD matching coefficients. This will confirm that the finite result is free of residual divergences. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.2] §5.2: the NNLL small-x resummation for the fragmentation function is matched to the N³LO fixed-order result, yet the consistency of the logarithmic terms between the two is not demonstrated by an explicit expansion; this is load-bearing for the combined prediction claimed in the abstract.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. In the revised version of §5.2 we will include an explicit expansion of the NNLL-resummed fragmentation function through N³LO, showing term-by-term agreement of the logarithmic contributions with the fixed-order N³LO result. This will substantiate the consistency of the matching and support the combined prediction stated in the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

N³LO matching computation is a direct perturbative evaluation with no definitional or self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper's central result is an explicit order-by-order calculation of the twist-2 matching coefficients for linearly polarized gluon TMDs onto collinear PDFs and FFs. This proceeds via standard Feynman-diagram evaluation of the TMD matrix elements, subtraction of collinear singularities, and verification of IR/rapidity pole cancellation at N³LO. No equation defines the output in terms of itself, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely via self-citation. Lower-order literature supplies independent building blocks rather than closing a loop on the N³LO terms. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result rests on standard perturbative QCD and TMD factorization assumptions rather than new postulates. No free parameters are introduced beyond the usual renormalization scale choice. No new particles or forces are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption TMD factorization theorem applies to the processes under consideration at the stated perturbative order
    Invoked implicitly throughout the matching calculation described in the abstract
  • standard math Infrared divergences cancel between real and virtual contributions up to N³LO
    Required for the matching coefficient to be finite and process-independent

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5617 in / 1421 out tokens · 47580 ms · 2026-05-18T19:08:18.140350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We compute the twist-2 matching of the transverse-momentum-dependent (TMD) linearly polarized gluon parton distribution and fragmentation functions at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order (N³LO) in QCD, supplemented by next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic (NNLL) small-x resummation

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Collinear matching for leading power gluon transverse momentum distributions

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Tree-level and one-loop collinear matching relations are computed for leading-power gluon TMD PDFs, yielding the first Wandzura-Wilczek approximation for the gluon worm-gear T distribution along with a closed-form mas...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 43 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    P. M. Nadolsky, C. Balazs, E. L. Berger, and C. P. Yuan,Gluon-gluon contributions to the production of continuum diphoton pairs at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 013008, [hep-ph/0702003]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    D. Boer, W. J. den Dunnen, C. Pisano, and M. Schlegel,Determining the Higgs spin and parity in the diphoton decay channel,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013), no. 3 032002, [arXiv:1304.2654]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  3. [3]

    On the linearly polarized gluon distributions in the color dipole model

    F. Dominguez, J.-W. Qiu, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan,On the linearly polarized gluon distributions in the color dipole model,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 045003, [arXiv:1109.6293]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    D. Boer, P. J. Mulders, J. Zhou, and Y.-j. Zhou,Suppression of maximal linear gluon polarization in angular asymmetries,JHEP10(2017) 196, [arXiv:1702.08195]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    D. Boer, P. J. Mulders, and C. Pisano,Dijet imbalance in hadronic collisions,Phys. Rev. D 80(2009) 094017, [arXiv:0909.4652]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    D. Boer, S. J. Brodsky, P. J. Mulders, and C. Pisano,Direct Probes of Linearly Polarized Gluons inside Unpolarized Hadrons,Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 132001, [arXiv:1011.4225]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    D. Boer, P. J. Mulders, C. Pisano, and J. Zhou,Asymmetries in Heavy Quark Pair and Dijet Production at an EIC,JHEP08(2016) 001, [arXiv:1605.07934]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    How to measure the linear polarization of gluons in unpolarized proton using the heavy-quark pair leptoproduction

    A. Efremov, N. Ivanov, and O. Teryaev,How to measure the linear polarization of gluons in unpolarized proton using the heavy-quark pair leptoproduction,Phys. Lett. B777(2018) 435–441, [arXiv:1711.05221]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Linearly-polarized small-x gluons in forward heavy-quark pair production

    C. Marquet, C. Roiesnel, and P. Taels,Linearly polarized small-xgluons in forward heavy-quark pair production,Phys. Rev. D97(2018), no. 1 014004, [arXiv:1710.05698]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    The distribution of linearly polarized gluons and elliptic azimuthal anisotropy in DIS dijet production at high energy

    A. Dumitru, T. Lappi, and V. Skokov,Distribution of Linearly Polarized Gluons and Elliptic Azimuthal Anisotropy in Deep Inelastic Scattering Dijet Production at High Energy,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015), no. 25 252301, [arXiv:1508.04438]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Linear polarization of gluons and photons in unpolarized collider experiments

    C. Pisano, D. Boer, S. J. Brodsky, M. G. Buffing, and P. J. Mulders,Linear polarization of gluons and photons in unpolarized collider experiments,JHEP10(2013) 024, [arXiv:1307.3417]. – 21 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Pinning down the linearly-polarised gluons inside unpolarised protons using quarkonium-pair production at the LHC

    J.-P. Lansberg, C. Pisano, F. Scarpa, and M. Schlegel,Pinning down the linearly-polarised gluons inside unpolarised protons using quarkonium-pair production at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B784(2018) 217–222, [arXiv:1710.01684]. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 791, 420–421 (2019)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Linearly polarized gluons in charmonium and bottomonium production in color octet model

    A. Mukherjee and S. Rajesh,Linearly polarized gluons in charmonium and bottomonium production in color octet model,Phys. Rev. D95(2017), no. 3 034039, [arXiv:1611.05974]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    D’Alesio, F

    U. D’Alesio, F. Murgia, C. Pisano, and P. Taels,Azimuthal asymmetries in semi-inclusive J/ψ+ jetproduction at an EIC,Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 9 094016, [arXiv:1908.00446]

    work page arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    $J/\psi$ Production in Polarized and Unpolarized $ep$ Collision and Sivers and $\cos2\phi$ Asymmetries

    A. Mukherjee and S. Rajesh,J/ψproduction in polarized and unpolarized ep collision and Sivers andcos 2ϕasymmetries,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017), no. 12 854, [arXiv:1609.05596]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Associated production of a dilepton and a $\Upsilon(J/\psi)$ at the LHC as a probe of gluon transverse momentum dependent distributions

    J.-P. Lansberg, C. Pisano, and M. Schlegel,Associated production of a dilepton and a Υ(J/ψ)at the LHC as a probe of gluon transverse momentum dependent distributions,Nucl. Phys. B920(2017) 192–210, [arXiv:1702.00305]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Accessing Linearly Polarized Gluon Distribution in $J/\psi$ Production at the Electron-Ion Collider

    R. Kishore and A. Mukherjee,Accessing linearly polarized gluon distribution inJ/ψ production at the electron-ion collider,Phys. Rev. D99(2019), no. 5 054012, [arXiv:1811.07495]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Gutierrez-Reyes, S

    D. Gutierrez-Reyes, S. Leal-Gomez, I. Scimemi, and A. Vladimirov,Linearly polarized gluons at next-to-next-to leading order and the Higgs transverse momentum distribution,JHEP11 (2019) 121, [arXiv:1907.03780]

    work page arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    D. Boer, W. J. den Dunnen, C. Pisano, M. Schlegel, and W. Vogelsang,Linearly Polarized Gluons and the Higgs Transverse Momentum Distribution,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 032002, [arXiv:1109.1444]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  20. [20]

    M. G. Echevarria, T. Kasemets, P. J. Mulders, and C. Pisano,QCD evolution of (un)polarized gluon TMDPDFs and the Higgsq T -distribution,JHEP07(2015) 158, [arXiv:1502.05354]. [Erratum: JHEP 05, 073 (2017)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    QCD transverse-momentum resummation in gluon fusion processes

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini,QCD transverse-momentum resummation in gluon fusion processes,Nucl. Phys. B845(2011) 297–323, [arXiv:1011.3918]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, A. Huss, Y. Li, D. Neill, M. Schulze, I. W. Stewart, and H. X. Zhu,Precise QCD Description of the Higgs Boson Transverse Momentum Spectrum,Phys. Lett. B788(2019) 425–430, [arXiv:1805.00736]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Gao, T.-Z

    A. Gao, T.-Z. Yang, and X. Zhang,The three-point energy correlator in the coplanar limit, JHEP08(2025) 030, [arXiv:2411.09428]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    M. A. Ebert, B. Mistlberger, and G. Vita,TMD fragmentation functions at N 3LO,JHEP07 (2021) 121, [arXiv:2012.07853]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    M. A. Ebert, B. Mistlberger, and G. Vita,Transverse momentum dependent PDFs at N 3LO, JHEP09(2020) 146, [arXiv:2006.05329]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Luo, T.-Z

    M.-x. Luo, T.-Z. Yang, H. X. Zhu, and Y. J. Zhu,Unpolarized Quark and Gluon TMD PDFs and FFs at N 3LO,arXiv:2012.03256

    work page arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    Luo, T.-Z

    M.-X. Luo, T.-Z. Yang, H. X. Zhu, and Y. J. Zhu,Transverse Parton Distribution and Fragmentation Functions at NNLO: the Gluon Case,JHEP01(2020) 040, [arXiv:1909.13820]. – 22 –

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Catani and P

    S. Catani and P. K. Dhani,Collinear functions for QCD resummations,JHEP03(2023) 200, [arXiv:2208.05840]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Y. Li, D. Neill, and H. X. Zhu,An exponential regulator for rapidity divergences,Nucl. Phys. B960(2020) 115193, [arXiv:1604.00392]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, and M. E. Luke,Summing Sudakov logarithms in B —>X(s gamma) in effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D63(2000) 014006, [hep-ph/0005275]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  31. [31]

    C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart,An Effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 114020, [hep-ph/0011336]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  32. [32]

    C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart,Soft collinear factorization in effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 054022, [hep-ph/0109045]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  33. [33]

    C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, I. Z. Rothstein, and I. W. Stewart,Hard scattering factorization from effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 014017, [hep-ph/0202088]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  34. [34]

    Soft-collinear effective theory and heavy-to-light currents beyond leading power

    M. Beneke, A. Chapovsky, M. Diehl, and T. Feldmann,Soft collinear effective theory and heavy to light currents beyond leading power,Nucl. Phys. B643(2002) 431–476, [hep-ph/0206152]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  35. [35]

    M.-X. Luo, X. Wang, X. Xu, L. L. Yang, T.-Z. Yang, and H. X. Zhu,Transverse Parton Distribution and Fragmentation Functions at NNLO: the Quark Case,JHEP10(2019) 083, [arXiv:1908.03831]

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Luo, T.-Z

    M.-x. Luo, T.-Z. Yang, H. X. Zhu, and Y. J. Zhu,Quark Transverse Parton Distribution at the Next-to-Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 9 092001, [arXiv:1912.05778]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Collins,Foundations of perturbative QCD,Camb

    J. Collins,Foundations of perturbative QCD,Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol.32(2011) 1–624

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Bootstrapping rapidity anomalous dimension for transverse-momentum resummation

    Y. Li and H. X. Zhu,Bootstrapping Rapidity Anomalous Dimensions for Transverse-Momentum Resummation,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017), no. 2 022004, [arXiv:1604.01404]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    J.-y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill, and I. Z. Rothstein,The Rapidity Renormalization Group,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 151601, [arXiv:1104.0881]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  40. [40]

    J.-Y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill, and I. Z. Rothstein,A Formalism for the Systematic Treatment of Rapidity Logarithms in Quantum Field Theory,JHEP05(2012) 084, [arXiv:1202.0814]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt,Four-Loop Non-Singlet Splitting Functions in the Planar Limit and Beyond,JHEP10(2017) 041, [arXiv:1707.08315]. [42]NNPDFCollaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC Run II,JHEP 04(2015) 040, [arXiv:1410.8849]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Marzani,CombiningQ T and small-xresummations,Phys

    S. Marzani,CombiningQ T and small-xresummations,Phys. Rev. D93(2016), no. 5 054047, [arXiv:1511.06039]

    work page arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Steinhauser,Quark and gluon form factors to three loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.102(2009) 212002, [arXiv:0902.3519]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    R. N. Lee, A. V. Smirnov, and V. A. Smirnov,Analytic Results for Massless Three-Loop Form Factors,JHEP04(2010) 020, [arXiv:1001.2887]. – 23 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  45. [45]

    Gehrmann, E

    T. Gehrmann, E. Glover, T. Huber, N. Ikizlerli, and C. Studerus,Calculation of the quark and gluon form factors to three loops in QCD,JHEP06(2010) 094, [arXiv:1004.3653]

    work page arXiv 2010

  46. [46]

    Resummation of small-x double logarithms in QCD: semi-inclusive electron-positron annihilation

    A. Vogt,Resummation of small-x double logarithms in QCD: semi-inclusive electron-positron annihilation,JHEP10(2011) 025, [arXiv:1108.2993]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  47. [47]

    Chen, T.-Z

    H. Chen, T.-Z. Yang, H. X. Zhu, and Y. J. Zhu,Analytic Continuation and Reciprocity Relation for Collinear Splitting in QCD,arXiv:2006.10534

    work page arXiv 2006

  48. [48]

    Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Evolution of Non-Singlet Fragmentation Functions

    A. Mitov, S. Moch, and A. Vogt,Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Evolution of Non-Singlet Fragmentation Functions,Phys. Lett. B638(2006) 61–67, [hep-ph/0604053]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [49]

    On Third-Order Timelike Splitting Functions and Top-Mediated Higgs Decay into Hadrons

    S. Moch and A. Vogt,On third-order timelike splitting functions and top-mediated Higgs decay into hadrons,Phys. Lett. B659(2008) 290–296, [arXiv:0709.3899]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  50. [50]

    On the Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Evolution of Flavour-Singlet Fragmentation Functions

    A. Almasy, S. Moch, and A. Vogt,On the Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Evolution of Flavour-Singlet Fragmentation Functions,Nucl. Phys. B854(2012) 133–152, [arXiv:1107.2263]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  51. [51]

    Five-Loop Running of the QCD coupling constant

    P. Baikov, K. Chetyrkin, and J. K¨ uhn,Five-Loop Running of the QCD coupling constant, Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017), no. 8 082002, [arXiv:1606.08659]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    S. Moch, J. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt,The Three loop splitting functions in QCD: The Nonsinglet case,Nucl. Phys. B688(2004) 101–134, [hep-ph/0403192]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  53. [53]

    Y. Li, A. von Manteuffel, R. M. Schabinger, and H. X. Zhu,Soft-virtual corrections to Higgs production at N 3LO,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 036008, [arXiv:1412.2771]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  54. [54]

    S. Moch, J. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt,Three-loop results for quark and gluon form-factors, Phys. Lett. B625(2005) 245–252, [hep-ph/0508055]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  55. [55]

    On the Structure of Infrared Singularities of Gauge-Theory Amplitudes

    T. Becher and M. Neubert,On the Structure of Infrared Singularities of Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,JHEP06(2009) 081, [arXiv:0903.1126]. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 024 (2013)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  56. [56]

    A. A. Vladimirov,Correspondence between Soft and Rapidity Anomalous Dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017), no. 6 062001, [arXiv:1610.05791]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    A. V. Manohar and I. W. Stewart,The Zero-Bin and Mode Factorization in Quantum Field Theory,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 074002, [hep-ph/0605001]. – 24 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007