Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 4 cited by

This paper shows that the surface Fermi arcs of t-PtBi2 satisfy all three accepted prerequisites for high-temperature superconductivity: a van Hove singularity, strong momentum-dependent bosonic coupling, and tunable arc size.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

ARPES and DFT show that t-PtBi2 surface Fermi arcs host a van Hove singularity and a momentum-dependent flat band, with spatially varying arc size that could tune superconductivity.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Good ARPES work on t-PtBi2, but the 'three prerequisites fulfilled' headline runs ahead of the data; the paper itself concedes the VHS and flat band sit below EF and the tunability is uncontrolled. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2509.02178 v1 pith:KYQBDLIW submitted 2025-09-02 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Three prerequisites for high-temperature superconductivity in t-PtBi$_2$

Andrii Kuibarov , Susmita Changdar , Riccardo Vocaturo , Oleksandr Suvorov , Alexander Fedorov , Rui Lou , Maxim Krivenkov , Luminita Harnagea
show 4 more authors
Sabine Wurmehl Jeroen van den Brink Bernd B\"uchner Sergey Borisenko
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el
keywords high-temperature superconductivitytopological Fermi arcsvan Hove singularityflat bandelectron-boson couplingt-PtBi2Weyl semimetalARPES
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that all three conditions usually required to make a material a high-temperature superconductor are met simultaneously on the surface of the topological semimetal t-PtBi2, not in its bulk. The surface hosts open electronic states called Fermi arcs, and measurements show one termination has a van Hove singularity, a point where the electron density of states spikes, while the other termination has a flat band segment indicating strong coupling to a bosonic mode. The same measurements reveal that the arc width changes across the sample, offering a natural tuning knob. Because these features sit only a few millielectronvolts from the Fermi level, the paper links them to the large, anisotropic superconducting gaps previously reported on this material, and suggests the combination could stabilize topological Majorana modes.

Core claim

The central claim is that all three generally recognized prerequisites for high-temperature superconductivity — a high density of states at the Fermi level, strong coupling of electrons to another degree of freedom, and tunability — are present in the surface Fermi arcs of t-PtBi2. On the decorated-honeycomb (DH) termination, the arc dispersion contains a type-I van Hove singularity whose logarithmic density of states is measured about 5–8 meV below the Fermi level. On the Kagome-type (KT) termination, the arc center shows a splitting into two branches with a nearly flat lower branch and a Fermi-velocity renormalization factor of about 2.5, attributed to strong momentum-dependent coupling to

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the surface Fermi arc: an open, two-dimensional topological surface state that is the only electronic structure bearing the relevant singular features. The paper establishes three pieces of machinery: (1) a type-I van Hove singularity, a saddle point in the two-dimensional arc dispersion whose density of states diverges logarithmically, found on the DH termination; (2) a strongly renormalized, almost dispersionless lower branch at the center of the KT-termination arc, with an extracted Fermi-velocity renormalization factor of about 2.5 and a momentum-dependent real part of the self-energy; and (3) the measured spatial variation of the arc width, which acts as a natural

Load-bearing premise

The entire strong-coupling pillar rests on the interpretation that the split, nearly flat band seen on the Kagome-type termination is caused by strong electron-boson coupling; if it is instead a band-structure effect such as bilayer splitting, surface reconstruction, or a matrix-element artifact, that prerequisite is not established.

What would settle it

Search for the bosonic mode directly. If the coupling picture is right, a collective excitation (e.g., a phonon or spin fluctuation) should exist near the momentum of the arc center, with an energy scale matching the kink position in the dispersion, and a temperature-dependent ARPES measurement should show the kink's strength softening as the mode occupancy changes. If, instead, the two-branch structure with its flat segment is reproduced by DFT slab calculations that include only the known crystal structure and no coupling term, the flat band is a band-structure effect and the strong-coupling

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the prerequisites are correctly identified, t-PtBi2 offers a single stoichiometric surface where all three ingredients for high-Tc superconductivity coexist, so optimizing Tc does not require heterostructures.
  • The measured spatial spread in Fermi-arc width provides a natural explanation for why STM sees superconducting gaps ranging from about 0.5 meV to 20 meV across different samples and locations.
  • The same momentum-dependent coupling that flattens the lower branch should govern the anisotropic i-wave gap on the KT termination, directly linking band renormalization to superconducting gap structure.
  • Pushing the Fermi level onto the van Hove singularity or the flat band, for example by doping, strain, or pressure, should increase the gap and Tc toward the upper STM values.
  • If the surface superconductivity is unconventional and topological, the combination of these features offers a concrete route to robust Majorana bound states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves the microscopic identity of the bosonic mode open; a natural test is momentum-resolved electron energy-loss spectroscopy near the arc center to detect the collective excitation at the kink energy scale.
  • The observed arc-size variation is natural spatial inhomogeneity, not controlled tuning; a direct extension would be electrostatic gating or surface doping to move the Fermi level and watch the arc width and superconducting gap respond.
  • The termination-dependent contrast (van Hove singularity on one cleave, flat band on the other) may generalize to other noncentrosymmetric Weyl semimetals with two cleavage planes, suggesting a design rule for searching for surface high-Tc superconductivity.
  • The flat band sits exactly at the arc center, where the group velocity vanishes; one could check whether the superconducting gap nodes are displaced away from that point, sharpening the link between coupling and gap anisotropy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports ARPES experiments on the two surface terminations of t-PtBi2 and argues that three generic prerequisites for high-temperature superconductivity are simultaneously fulfilled on its surface Fermi arcs: (i) a van Hove singularity near the Fermi level on the DH termination, (ii) strong electron-boson coupling producing a flat band on the KT termination, and (iii) tunability inferred from spatial variations of the Fermi arc size. The paper combines laser- and synchrotron-based ARPES with DFT slab calculations, and explicitly connects the findings to previously reported surface superconductivity and an anisotropic pairing gap. The abstract and conclusion claim that all three prerequisites are 'remarkably fulfilled.'

Significance. If the central claim were established, t-PtBi2 would stand out as a single stoichiometric topological material in which high-Tc-relevant electronic structure coexists with surface superconducting arcs, making it a promising platform for engineering topological superconductivity. The paper has genuine strengths: the ARPES data are high-resolution, the termination assignment is careful, the VHS identification on the DH termination is supported by both dispersion cuts and DFT, and the KT-termination double-branch structure is an interesting observation. However, the paper's own quantitative statements in Section 5 undermine the claim that all three prerequisites are already fulfilled: the VHS and flat band lie 5–8 meV below EF, while the measured gap is 1.5–2 meV, and the text concedes these features have not yet played a dominant role. The tunability evidence is also limited to three spots without a controlled parameter. Thus the significance, as currently argued, is more prospective than demonstrated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, Section 5] The abstract's claim that all three prerequisites are 'remarkably fulfilled' is contradicted by the manuscript's own quantitative statements. Section 5 states that 'both the van Hove singularity and the flat band are located approximately 5–8 meV below the Fermi level, whereas the superconducting gap measured by ARPES is only 1.5–2 meV' and that 'these features have not yet played a dominant role in determining the Tc and ∆.' Section 3 similarly admits the VHS is 'too far below the Fermi level (about 5–7 meV).' Prerequisite (i) requires high DOS near EF; a feature 5–8 meV below EF, with no observed effect on the gap, does not meet that condition in the measured state. This is a load-bearing inconsistency between the central claim and the data.
  2. [Section 4, Fig. 3] The evidence for prerequisite (ii) is the splitting and flat band on the KT termination, attributed to 'a strong interaction between the surface electrons forming the arc and a bosonic mode.' This attribution is explicitly speculative ('We may attribute...'), no bosonic mode is identified, and no alternative mechanisms—bilayer splitting, surface reconstruction, matrix-element effects—are considered or modeled. The extracted self-energy and renormalization factor (~2.5) rely on an assumed linear bare dispersion from DFT without independent validation. Because the strong-coupling prerequisite collapses if this attribution is wrong, the manuscript needs either a more rigorous demonstration (e.g., temperature-dependent ARPES, mode-energy identification, or quantitative modeling of alternatives) or a clearly softened claim.
  3. [Section 5, Fig. 4] The claim of tunability (prerequisite iii) is not established by the presented data. The evidence consists of three ARPES spots, one near the sample edge, with no error bars and no controlled external parameter. The paper itself concedes 'the origin of this difference in arc size is currently unknown and has not yet been controlled.' That is a demonstration of spatial inhomogeneity, not of tunability. To support the claim, the authors would need a systematic parameter scan (e.g., doping, strain, gate voltage, or a continuous spatial map) or should explicitly present this as a future prospect, not as a fulfilled prerequisite.
  4. [Section 5] The connection between the observed spatial variation and the large superconducting gaps reported by STM (up to 20 meV) is speculative. Section 5 proposes that local regions may have the VHS or flat band closer to EF, but no direct correlation is shown between the three ARPES spots and STM gap maps on the same length scale. This is an interesting hypothesis, but it is not evidence for the 'remarkably fulfilled' claim and should be separated from the main conclusion.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction, first paragraph] Typo: 'quesions' should be 'questions'.
  2. [Introduction, first paragraph] Typo: 'strontioum ruthenate' should be 'strontium ruthenate'.
  3. [Section 4] Typo: 'anistropic' should be 'anisotropic'.
  4. [Conclusion] The notation 'i-wave pairing symmetry' is nonstandard; if it refers to a specific nodal symmetry introduced in Ref. [18], a brief definition or reference to the figure where this symmetry is defined would help the reader.
  5. [Section 4, Fig. 3f] The text refers to the Supplementary Material for how the linear bare dispersion and self-energy were extracted, but no supplement is included in the submitted arXiv version. Please include the supplement or describe the procedure in the main text.
  6. [Fig. 4 caption] Panel (d) shows 'size of the arc at three different spots' but the caption does not define the metric used for arc size or include uncertainties; please specify how the size was extracted and quantify the error bars.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central claims rest on independent ARPES observations; self-citations are contextual, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is empirical rather than circular. The van Hove singularity on the DH termination is identified from measured ARPES dispersions (hole-like along one cut, electron-like along the perpendicular cut) and corroborated by DFT; the singularity's existence is not assumed from the paper's own prerequisites. The flat band and renormalization on the KT termination are extracted directly from ARPES intensity maps and MDC/EDC fitting, with the DFT band used only as a bare-band reference; the attribution to a bosonic mode is explicitly speculative ('We may attribute this splitting to a strong interaction...') but is not a fitted parameter recycled into a prediction. The tunability claim is based on measured spatial variation of Fermi arc width across three spots, not on a parameter fitted to the same data. Self-citations to Refs. [16] and [18] provide context for the existing surface superconductivity and anisotropic gap, but the VHS, flat band, and arc-size variation are not derived from those papers. The paper itself flags a key limitation in Section 5: the VHS and flat band sit 5–8 meV below EF while the ARPES gap is 1.5–2 meV, so these features 'have not yet played a dominant role'—a validity concern about the headline claim, not a circularity. No equation or fitted parameter is shown to be equivalent to an output by construction. The circularity burden is therefore low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper rests on a small set of domain assumptions and two ad hoc interpretations. The only fitted parameter is the assumed bare dispersion slope used for self-energy extraction. The 'bosonic mode' is a placeholder entity with no independent handle. The paper does not introduce new free parameters fitted to the data.

free parameters (1)
  • Bare linear dispersion slope for self-energy extraction = vF = 1.2 eV·Å (from DFT, assumed bare)
    Used to extract the real part of the self-energy in Fig. 3f. The experimental upper branch vF = 0.5 eV·Å is extracted from MDC fits, giving a renormalization factor of 2.5, but no error bars are provided.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption High DOS near EF, strong coupling to another degree of freedom, and tunability are prerequisites for high-Tc superconductivity.
    Stated in the Introduction with refs [1-15]; the paper treats these as consensus without re-deriving them.
  • ad hoc to paper The observed splitting and flat band on the KT termination arise from electron-boson coupling.
    Section 4: 'We may attribute this splitting to a strong interaction between the surface electrons forming the arc and a bosonic mode.' No alternative mechanisms are ruled out.
  • domain assumption DFT-GGA correctly describes the bare band structure and Fermi arc dispersions.
    Methods Section 6.1: FPLO with GGA; the calculations are compared to ARPES, but the bare dispersion used for self-energy extraction is taken from DFT.
  • ad hoc to paper Spatial variation in Fermi arc width implies local tuning of the chemical potential relative to VHS/flat band.
    Section 5: the paper infers that STM-observed 20 meV gaps come from regions where the VHS/flat band aligns with EF, but no local measurement of that alignment is provided.
invented entities (1)
  • Bosonic mode coupled to surface electrons on the KT termination no independent evidence
    purpose: Explain the strongly renormalized flat band and momentum-dependent splitting in the Fermi arc dispersion.
    Section 4 introduces this mode as the likely cause of the observed features, but does not identify its nature, energy, or momentum, and provides no independent prediction beyond the interpretation itself.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Three prerequisites for high-temperature superconductivity in t-PtBi$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KYQBDLIW

@misc{pith2026250902178,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Three prerequisites for high-temperature superconductivity in t-PtBi$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KYQBDLIW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02178}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Although the generic mechanism behind high-temperature superconductivity remains notoriously elusive, a set of favorable conditions for its occurrence in a given material has emerged: (i) the electronic structure should have a very high density of states near the Fermi level; (ii) electrons need to be susceptible to a sizable interaction with another degree of freedom to ensure pairing themselves; (iii) the ability to fine-tune some of the system properties significantly helps maximising the critical temperature. Here, by means of high-resolution ARPES, we show that all three criteria are remarkably fulfilled in trigonal platinum bismuthide (t-PtBi$_2$). Specifically, this happens on its surface, which hosts topological surface states known as Fermi arcs. Our findings pave the way for the stabilisation and optimisation of high-temperature superconductivity in this topological material.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mechanism for Nodal Topological Superconductivity on PtBi$_2$ Surface

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Anisotropic electron-phonon coupling with screened Coulomb repulsion yields nodal gaps in PtBi2 surface superconductivity when bandwidth approximates phonon energy.

  2. Mechanism for Nodal Topological Superconductivity on PtBi$_2$ Surface

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    Anisotropic electron-phonon coupling plus screened Coulomb repulsion on Weyl-semimetal Fermi arcs yields the observed nodal i-wave superconducting gap when the surface bandwidth matches the phonon energy scale.

  3. Fermiology and spin polarization of topological surface states in PtBi$_2$

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Spin-ARPES on PtBi2 shows spin-polarized singly degenerate Fermi-arc surface states with termination-dependent dispersion, supporting its candidacy for topological superconductivity.

  4. Disentangling bulk and surface states in the electronic structure of PtBi$_2$(0001)

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 accept novelty 4.0

    Photon-energy and polarization-dependent ARPES plus DFT disentangle and assign bulk and surface states on both DH and KL terminations of PtBi2(0001), with orbital character matching polarization trends.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering 19(3), 292–304 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/tee.23976 7

    Shimoyama, J., Motoki, T.: Current status of high temperature superconducting materials and their various applications. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering 19(3), 292–304 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/tee.23976 7

    work page doi:10.1002/tee.23976 2023

  2. [2]

    Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 25(3), 657–667 (2012) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10948-012-1434-3

    Bok, J., Bouvier, J.: Superconductivity and the van hove scenario. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 25(3), 657–667 (2012) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10948-012-1434-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10948-012-1434-3 2012

  3. [3]

    Nature Materials 12(7), 600–601 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3683

    Borisenko, S.: Fewer atoms, more information. Nature Materials 12(7), 600–601 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3683

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat3683 2013

  4. [4]

    Physica C: Superconductivity 263(1–4), 505–509 (1996) https: //doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(96)00073-1

    Yokoya, T., Chainani, A., Takahashi, T., Katayama-Yoshida, H., Kasai, M., Tokura, Y.: Extended van-hove singularity in sr2ruo4 observed by angle-resolved photoemission. Physica C: Superconductivity 263(1–4), 505–509 (1996) https: //doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(96)00073-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0921-4534(96)00073-1 1996

  5. [5]

    Science 382(6669), 447–450 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adf3348

    Noad, H.M.L., Ishida, K., Li, Y.-S., Gati, E., Stangier, V., Kikugawa, N., Sokolov, D.A., Nicklas, M., Kim, B., Mazin, I.I., Garst, M., Schmalian, J., Mackenzie, A.P., Hicks, C.W.: Giant lattice softening at a lifshitz transition in sr2ruo4. Science 382(6669), 447–450 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adf3348

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adf3348 2023

  6. [6]

    Kim, K., Kim, S., Kim, J.S., Kim, H., Park, J.-H., Min, B.I.: Importance of the van hove singularity in superconducting pdte 2. Phys. Rev. B 97, 165102 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.165102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.165102 2018

  7. [7]

    Nature Communications 14(1) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39500-7

    Luo, Y., Han, Y., Liu, J., Chen, H., Huang, Z., Huai, L., Li, H., Wang, B., Shen, J., Ding, S., Li, Z., Peng, S., Wei, Z., Miao, Y., Sun, X., Ou, Z., Xiang, Z., Hashimoto, M., Lu, D., Yao, Y., Yang, H., Chen, X., Gao, H.-J., Qiao, Z., Wang, Z., He, J.: A unique van hove singularity in kagome superconductor csv3- xtaxsb5 with enhanced superconductivity. Na...

    doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39500-7 2023

  8. [8]

    Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 161, 110451 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110451

    Villa-Cort´ es, S., Pe˜ na-Seaman, O.: Effect of van hove singularity on the isotope effect and critical temperature of h3s hydride superconductor as a function of pressure. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 161, 110451 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110451

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Nature Physics 6(2), 109–113 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1463

    Li, G., Luican, A., Santos, J.M.B., Castro Neto, A.H., Reina, A., Kong, J., Andrei, E.Y.: Observation of van hove singularities in twisted graphene layers. Nature Physics 6(2), 109–113 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1463

    doi:10.1038/nphys1463 2009

  10. [10]

    Nature Physics 17(5), 619–626 (2021) https://doi

    Xu, S., Al Ezzi, M.M., Balakrishnan, N., Garcia-Ruiz, A., Tsim, B., Mullan, C., Barrier, J., Xin, N., Piot, B.A., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K., Carvalho, A., Mishchenko, A., Geim, A.K., Fal’ko, V.I., Adam, S., Neto, A.H.C., Novoselov, K.S., Shi, Y.: Tunable van hove singularities and correlated states in twisted monolayer–bilayer graphene. Nature Physics 1...

    doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01172-9 2021

  11. [11]

    Science 285(5436), 2110–2113 (1999) https:// 8 doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5436.2110

    Valla, T., Fedorov, A.V., Johnson, P.D., Wells, B.O., Hulbert, S.L., Li, Q., Gu, G.D., Koshizuka, N.: Evidence for quantum critical behavior in the optimally doped cuprate bi2sr2cacu2o8+d. Science 285(5436), 2110–2113 (1999) https:// 8 doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5436.2110

    work page arXiv 1999

  12. [12]

    Science 328(5981), 999–1002 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1126/science

    Bostwick, A., Speck, F., Seyller, T., Horn, K., Polini, M., Asgari, R., MacDon- ald, A.H., Rotenberg, E.: Observation of plasmarons in quasi-freestanding doped graphene. Science 328(5981), 999–1002 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1186489

    doi:10.1126/science 2010

  13. [13]

    Nature 412(6846), 510–514 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1038/35087518

    Lanzara, A., Bogdanov, P.V., Zhou, X.J., Kellar, S.A., Feng, D.L., Lu, E.D., Yoshida, T., Eisaki, H., Fujimori, A., Kishio, K., Shimoyama, J.-I., Noda, T., Uchida, S., Hussain, Z., Shen, Z.-X.: Evidence for ubiquitous strong elec- tron–phonon coupling in high-temperature superconductors. Nature 412(6846), 510–514 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1038/35087518

    doi:10.1038/35087518 2001

  14. [14]

    Nature Physics 5(3), 217–221 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1180

    Dahm, T., Hinkov, V., Borisenko, S.V., Kordyuk, A.A., Zabolotnyy, V.B., Fink, J., B¨ uchner, B., Scalapino, D.J., Hanke, W., Keimer, B.: Strength of the spin- fluctuation-mediated pairing interaction in a high-temperature superconductor. Nature Physics 5(3), 217–221 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1180

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1180 2009

  15. [15]

    Kordyuk, A.A., Borisenko, S.V., Koitzsch, A., Fink, J., Knupfer, M., Berger, H.: Bare electron dispersion from experiment: Self-consistent self-energy analysis of photoemission data. Phys. Rev. B 71, 214513 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.71.214513

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    Nature 626(7998), 294–299 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-023-06977-7

    Kuibarov, A., Suvorov, O., Vocaturo, R., Fedorov, A., Lou, R., Merkwitz, L., Voroshnin, V., Facio, J.I., Koepernik, K., Yaresko, A., Shipunov, G., Aswartham, S., van den Brink, J., B¨ uchner, B., Borisenko, S.: Evidence of superconduct- ing fermi arcs. Nature 626(7998), 294–299 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-023-06977-7

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Nature Communications 15(1) (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54389-6

    Schimmel, S., Fasano, Y., Hoffmann, S., Besproswanny, J., Corredor Bohorquez, L.T., Puig, J., Elshalem, B.-C., Kalisky, B., Shipunov, G., Baumann, D., Aswartham, S., B¨ uchner, B., Hess, C.: Surface superconductivity in the topo- logical weyl semimetal t-ptbi2. Nature Communications 15(1) (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54389-6

    doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54389-6 2024

  18. [18]

    arXiv (2025)

    Changdar, S., Suvorov, O., Kuibarov, A., Thirupathaiah, S., Shipunov, G., Aswartham, S., Wurmehl, S., Kovalchuk, I., Koepernik, K., Timm, C., B¨ uchner, B., Fulga, I.C., Borisenko, S., van den Brink, J.: Topological nodal i-wave superconductivity in PtBi 2. arXiv (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV. 2507.01774 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01774

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.01774 2025

  19. [19]

    Temperature dependence of surface superconductivity in t-PtBi$_2$

    Besproswanny, J., Schimmel, S., Fasano, Y., Shipunov, G., Aswartham, S., Baumann, D., B¨ uchner, B., Hess, C.: Temperature dependence of surface super- conductivity in t-PtBi 2. arXiv (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2507. 10187 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10187

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.10187 2025

  20. [20]

    arXiv (2025)

    Huang, X., Zhao, L., Schimmel, S., Besproswanny, J., H¨ artl, P., Hess, C., B¨ uchner, 9 B., Bode, M.: Sizable superconducting gap and anisotropic chiral topological superconductivity in the Weyl semimetal PtBi 2. arXiv (2025). https://doi.org/ 10.48550/ARXIV.2507.13843 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13843

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.13843 2025

  21. [21]

    Advanced Physics Research 4(5) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/apxr

    Hoffmann, S., Schimmel, S., Vocaturo, R., Puig, J., Shipunov, G., Janson, O., Aswartham, S., Baumann, D., B¨ uchner, B., van den Brink, J., Fasano, Y., Facio, J.I., Hess, C.: Fermi arcs dominating the electronic surface properties of trigo- nal ptbi2. Advanced Physics Research 4(5) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/apxr. 202400150

    work page doi:10.1002/apxr 2024

  22. [22]

    Nano Letters 23(4), 1229–1235 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04297

    Veyrat, A., Labracherie, V., Bashlakov, D.L., Caglieris, F., Facio, J.I., Shipunov, G., Charvin, T., Acharya, R., Naidyuk, Y., Giraud, R., van den Brink, J., B¨ uchner, B., Hess, C., Aswartham, S., Dufouleur, J.: Berezin- skii–kosterlitz–thouless transition in the type-i weyl semimetal ptbi2. Nano Letters 23(4), 1229–1235 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1021/ac...

    doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04297 2023

  23. [23]

    Shipunov, G., Kovalchuk, I., Piening, B.R., Labracherie, V., Veyrat, A., Wolf, D., Lubk, A., Subakti, S., Giraud, R., Dufouleur, J., Shokri, S., Caglieris, F., Hess, C., Efremov, D.V., B¨ uchner, B., Aswartham, S.: Polymorphic ptbi 2: Growth, structure, and superconducting properties. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 124202 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMater...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.124202 2020

  24. [24]

    Majchrzak, P., Sanders, C., Zhang, Y., Kuibarov, A., Suvorov, O., Springate, E., Kovalchuk, I., Aswartham, S., Shipunov, G., B¨ uchner, B., Yaresko, A., Borisenko, S., Hofmann, P.: Machine-learning approach to understanding ultrafast carrier dynamics in the three-dimensional brillouin zone of ptbi 2. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013025 (2025) https://doi.org/10.110...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.013025 2025

  25. [25]

    Vocaturo, R., Koepernik, K., Facio, J.I., Timm, C., Fulga, I.C., Janson, O., Brink, J.: Electronic structure of the surface-superconducting weyl semimetal ptbi 2. Phys. Rev. B 110, 054504 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.054504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.054504 2024

  26. [26]

    Hirsch, J.E., Scalapino, D.J.: Enhanced superconductivity in quasi two- dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2732–2735 (1986) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.56.2732

    work page 1986

  27. [27]

    Mahan, G.D.: Electron-phonon interaction near van hove singularities. Phys. Rev. B 48, 16557–16563 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.16557

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.48.16557 1993

  28. [28]

    npj Quantum Materials 9(1) (2024) https://doi.org/10

    Ojaj¨ arvi, R., Chubukov, A.V., Lee, Y.-C., Garst, M., Schmalian, J.: Pairing at a single van hove point. npj Quantum Materials 9(1) (2024) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41535-024-00717-4

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    arXiv (2025)

    Moreno, J.A., Talavera, P.G., Herrera, E., Valle, S.L., Li, Z., Wang, L.-L., Bud’ko, S., Buzdin, A.I., Guillam´ on, I., Canfield, P.C., Suderow, H.: Robust surface superconductivity and vortex lattice in the Weyl semimetal t-PtBi 2. arXiv (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2508.04867 . https://arxiv.org/ 10 abs/2508.04867

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.04867 2025

  30. [30]

    Koepernik, K., Eschrig, H.: Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum- basis band-structure scheme. Phys. Rev. B 59(3), 1743–1757 (1999) https://doi. org/10.1103/physrevb.59.1743

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1743 1999

  31. [31]

    Perdew, J.P., Burke, K., Ernzerhof, M.: Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396–1396 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.78.1396

    work page 1997

  32. [32]

    Koepernik, K., Janson, O., Sun, Y., Brink, J.: Symmetry-conserving maximally projected Wannier functions. Phys. Rev. B 107, 235135 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.235135 11 Fig. 1 Fermi surface maps and STM topography of two terminations in t-PtBi 2. a,b Theoretical Fermi surfaces for KT and DH terminations. c,d Experimental Fermi surface map...

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.235135 2023

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.