Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 36 references

Photon-energy and polarization ARPES separate bulk bands from surface states on both terminations of PtBi2(0001).

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Photon-energy and polarization-dependent ARPES plus DFT disentangle and assign bulk and surface states on both DH and KL terminations of PtBi2(0001), with orbital character matching polarization trends.

T0 review reviewed 2026-07-30 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid termination-resolved ARPES+DFT atlas that finally sorts bulk from surface on both PtBi2(0001) faces; useful infrastructure, not a mechanism paper.

arxiv 2607.26804 v1 pith:OU7JW7GR submitted 2026-07-29 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Disentangling bulk and surface states in the electronic structure of PtBi$_2$(0001)

Stefanie Suzanne Brinkman , Xin Liang Tan , Anders Christian Mathisen , Fabian G\"ohler , {\O}yvind Finnseth , Chul-Hee Min , Grigory Shipunov , Falk Pabst
show 8 more authors
Manuel Alonso Lemos Balasubramanian Thiagarajan Craig Polley Masashi Arita Kenya Shimada Anna Isaeva Jorge I. Facio Hendrik Bentmann
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords PtBi2ARPESsurface statesbulk bandsFermi arcsWeyl semimetalorbital charactersurface termination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Reports of surface-localized topological superconductivity in trigonal PtBi2 make its surface electronic structure a practical problem, not just a band-structure curiosity. This paper uses vacuum-ultraviolet ARPES while sweeping photon energy and light polarization, together with density-functional surface calculations, to pull bulk dispersions apart from surface states on the two distinct cleave terminations (decorated-honeycomb and Kagome-like). Several surface features—including the Fermi arc and, on the decorated-honeycomb face, a Dirac-like crossing at the zone center—are assigned and matched to calculation. Orbital weights from the same calculations line up with the polarization dependence seen in the spectra. The result is a termination-resolved map of which states are bulk, which are surface, and how they hybridize near the Fermi level.

Core claim

By combining photon-energy-dependent ARPES (to track kz bulk dispersion) with polarization-dependent intensity and semi-infinite slab spectral-weight calculations, the bulk continuum can be disentangled from true surface states on both DH and KL terminations of PtBi2(0001). Several surface features are assigned on each face, experiment and calculation agree well enough to give a coherent picture, and the orbital makeup of those bands explains the observed polarization contrast.

What carries the argument

Photon-energy series plus polarization matrix-element contrast in ARPES, read against DFT surface spectral weight on semi-infinite Wannier slabs for the two terminations—the tool that labels which intensity is bulk (kz-dispersive continuum) versus surface (sharp, kz-independent).

Load-bearing premise

That VUV photon energies, with their finite escape-depth kz broadening, plus standard GGA slab calculations, are accurate enough to uniquely tag mixed bulk–surface bands even when theory and experiment sit a few tenths of an eV apart.

What would settle it

A soft-X-ray or broader photon-energy ARPES series in which any of the assigned surface features (the Fermi arc, the DH Γ Dirac-like crossing, or the steep near-EF KL band labeled mixed) clearly disperses with kz, or a slab calculation that moves that DH crossing into agreement with experiment while destroying the other surface assignments.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Termination must be specified when linking ARPES or STM gaps to topological surface superconductivity on PtBi2.
  • The DH Dirac-like crossing and the KL Fermi-arc mixing with bulk continuum are distinct spectroscopic fingerprints of each face.
  • Polarization can be used as an orbital filter to enhance or suppress specific surface bands in future gap or spin measurements.
  • Bulk Rashba-like branches and steep A-plane bands are now experimentally anchored against calculation across a wide photon-energy range.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Any claim that the superconducting gap lives only on Fermi arcs needs termination-controlled samples; mixed bulk–surface weight on KL could dilute or mimic a surface gap.
  • The ~0.2 eV theory–experiment offset of the DH Dirac crossing is a natural target for beyond-GGA or surface-relaxation calculations before using that state as a topological marker.
  • Spin-resolved ARPES on the polarization-selected DH pz-dominated crossing would test whether that state carries a distinct spin texture from the arc.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a VUV-ARPES and DFT study of trigonal non-centrosymmetric PtBi2(0001), aimed at disentangling bulk dispersions from surface states on the two cleave terminations (decorated-honeycomb, DH, and Kagome-like, KL). Photon-energy-dependent spectra are used to separate Γ-plane versus A-plane bulk features (notably Rashba-like branches near M and steeper A-plane bands), while surface spectral-weight calculations on semi-infinite Wannier slabs are compared to termination-resolved ARPES to assign several surface features, including the Fermi arc and a DH-only Dirac-like crossing at Γ. Orbital projections (Bi 6p) are then related to polarization-dependent intensity trends. The authors conclude that experiment and calculation agree sufficiently to give a coherent, termination-resolved picture of the surface electronic structure relevant to reported surface superconductivity.

Significance. If the assignments hold, the work supplies a practical multi-handle atlas (hν, polarization, termination) for a material in which surface-localized topological superconductivity has been claimed but remains experimentally contested. The combination of kz-sensitive bulk stacks, semi-infinite surface spectral weight, and orbital/polarization cross-checks is the right toolkit for this problem, and the side-by-side DH versus KL comparison fills a genuine gap left by prior Fermi-arc-focused studies. Strengths include systematic labeling of multiple surface features (1)–(7), explicit acknowledgment of kz broadening and residual energy offsets, and orbital-resolved calculations that give a concrete (if qualitative) account of polarization matrix-element trends. The result is incremental rather than transformative, but it is useful reference work for the PtBi2 community.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Results, Bulk bands; Fig. 2] Results, bulk bands / Fig. 2: The free-electron-like kz assignment (56 eV ~ Γ-plane, 18 eV ~ A-plane) is standard and consistent with the data, but the inner potential and the estimated kz-broadening window are never stated. A short sentence (or a note pointing to Fig. S1) would make the mapping reproducible.
  2. [Results, Surface states; Figs. 3–4] Results, surface states / Figs. 3–4: The DH Dirac-like crossing (feature 5) is ~0.2 eV deeper in experiment than in the surface calculation; the KL steep near-EF feature is described as mixed bulk–surface. Both points are already noted, but a brief quantitative summary of residual energy shifts across the labeled features would help readers judge assignment robustness without hunting through the text.
  3. [Orbital character and polarization dependence] Orbital character section / Eq. (1) and Fig. 6: The dipole-selection discussion correctly notes that ΓM is not a strict crystal mirror plane, yet still applies even/odd language. Clarifying that this is only a qualitative guide (and that final-state and photon-energy effects also matter) would avoid over-reading the polarization contrast, especially for the Rashba-like bulk bands that show little systematic polarization dependence.
  4. [Fig. 2; Fig. 4] Fig. 2(e) green arrow and related text: The mixed bulk–surface character of the steep near-EF band on KL is important for Fermi-arc discussions; a cross-reference to the surface calculation panel (Fig. 4a) at that momentum would make the mixed assignment easier to verify.
  5. [Throughout / Experimental Details] Minor presentation: several figure captions and the main text refer to Supplemental Figs. S1–S6 that are not in the submitted main file; ensure they are complete and that energy/momentum scales and polarization labels are consistent with the main figures. Also fix small typos (e.g., “EXPERIMENT AL DET AILS”, “i-wave” spacing, author-name umlauts/encoding).
  6. [Introduction] Introduction: The contested experimental status of surface superconductivity is summarized fairly; a single sentence stating that the present work does not itself address the gap or Tc would set expectations cleanly for readers coming from the SC literature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: ARPES assignments rest on independent photon-energy, polarization, and termination knobs compared to parameter-free DFT/Wannier spectral weight.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing chain is experimental ARPES (hν series 10–120 eV, s/p polarization, two cleave terminations) compared to standard GGA bulk bands and semi-infinite Wannier surface spectral weight. Bulk vs surface labels are fixed by kz-dispersion (or its absence) and by termination dependence, not by fitting free parameters to the same spectra that are then 'predicted.' Orbital projections are used only to rationalize already-observed polarization matrix-element trends; they are not tuned to force agreement. Prior theory citations (including author-overlapping surface-structure papers) supply computational context and nomenclature but are not invoked as uniqueness theorems or as the sole evidence for the assignments. Energy offsets (e.g., ~0.2 eV for the DH Dirac-like crossing) are disclosed rather than absorbed into a fit. The derivation is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard ARPES interpretation and GGA-DFT surface electronic structure practice. No new particles or forces are introduced. Load-bearing modeling choices are the experimental crystal structure, GGA semi-infinite Wannier slabs with a chosen orbital window, and the dipole photoemission picture used qualitatively for polarization. Discrepancies are absorbed as typical DFT energy shifts rather than free spectral fits to the central claim.

free parameters (2)
  • Effective kz (inner potential / free-electron final-state mapping) = Not numerically stated; representative hν=56 eV (Γ) and 18 eV (A)
    Photon energy is mapped to bulk kz planes (Γ vs A) without a fully specified inner potential in the main text; assignments of 56 eV→Γ-plane and 18 eV→A-plane follow prior practice and visual match.
  • Overall DFT energy alignment relative to EF
    Comparisons allow ‘minor energy shifts’ (e.g., DH Dirac crossing calc −0.7 eV vs exp −0.9 eV); no rigid-shift value is fitted as a reported parameter, but alignment is adjusted narratively when assigning features.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption GGA-DFT with the experimental P31m structure adequately describes bulk Bi 6p / Pt 5d bands near EF for assignment purposes.
    Invoked throughout Results for bulk kz stacks (Fig. 2) and prior-literature agreement; no hybrid/GW correction.
  • domain assumption Semi-infinite slabs of a Wannier Hamiltonian (Bi 6s/6p, Pt 6s/5d) yield surface spectral weight that can be compared directly to ARPES for state assignment.
    Methods and surface-state sections (Figs. 3–5); standard for topological-semimetal surface calculations.
  • domain assumption VUV ARPES intensity variations with hν primarily reflect kz dispersion plus matrix elements, so non-dispersive sharp features are surface-localized.
    Core disentangling strategy in Introduction/Results; authors note finite escape-depth kz broadening.
  • domain assumption Dipole selection with approximate even/odd character relative to the incidence plane explains s- versus p-polarization contrast (even px/pz vs odd py), even though ΓM is not a strict crystal mirror in the setup geometry.
    Orbital character section, Eq. (1) and following paragraphs; stated as qualitative insight.
  • domain assumption Repeated cleaves of a given crystal expose a single homogeneous termination (DH or KL) suitable for assignment.
    Experimental Details: ‘repeated cleaves reproducibly yielded the same surface termination.’
  • standard math Standard relativistic Kohn–Sham DFT / tetrahedron BZ integration mathematics as implemented in FPLO.
    Methods citation to FPLO and GGA; background computational machinery.

reviewed 2026-07-30 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Disentangling bulk and surface states in the electronic structure of PtBi$_2$(0001)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OU7JW7GR

@misc{pith2026260726804,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Disentangling bulk and surface states in the electronic structure of PtBi$_2$(0001)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OU7JW7GR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26804}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Recent reports of surface-localized topological superconductivity in trigonal PtBi$_2$ highlight the importance of understanding its surface electronic structure. We investigate the bulk and surface band structure of PtBi$_2$ using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) and first-principles calculations. Through photon-energy- and polarization-dependent measurements, we disentangle bulk dispersions from surface states on the two distinct surface terminations of PtBi$_2$(0001). For both terminations, we assign several different surface states and find good agreement between experiment and calculations. Based on our calculations, we analyze the orbital composition in the surface and bulk bands and compare the results to polarization-dependent ARPES measurements. Together, our results provide a coherent picture of the surface electronic structure of PtBi$_2$ across both surface terminations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26804 by Anders Christian Mathisen, Anna Isaeva, Balasubramanian Thiagarajan, Chul-Hee Min, Craig Polley, Fabian G\"ohler, Falk Pabst, Grigory Shipunov, Hendrik Bentmann, Jorge I. Facio, Kenya Shimada, Manuel Alonso Lemos, Masashi Arita, {\O}yvind Finnseth, Stefanie Suzanne Brinkman, Xin Liang Tan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Atomic configuration of trigonal PtBi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (b), two bands near the M-point exhibit a Rashba￾like splitting, studied in detail in Ref. [22], with the outer branch located well below the Fermi level. The inner branch starts at approximately E −EF ≈ −0.5 eV at the M-point (kz = 0) and disperses steeply upward toward Γ. Moving away from M, its group velocity decreases and the band gradually flattens, forming a hole-like dis￾persion that constitutes the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Surface spectral weight calculation of a sample with DH surface termination along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Surface spectral weight calculation of a sample with KL surface termination along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Surface spectral weight calculation of a DH-terminated sample along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Geometry of the ARPES experiment at BL-9A, HiSOR, showing the definitions of horizontal ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Calculated bulk band structure along Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  2. [2]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Kuibarov, O

    A. Kuibarov, O. Suvorov, R. Vocaturo, A. Fedorov, 9 R. Lou, L. Merkwitz, V. Voroshnin, J. I. Facio, K. Koepernik, A. Yaresko, G. Shipunov, S. Aswartham, J. van den Brink, B. B¨ uchner, and S. Borisenko, Evidence of superconducting Fermi arcs, Nature626, 294 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Changdar, O

    S. Changdar, O. Suvorov, A. Kuibarov, S. Thirupatha- iah, G. Shipunov, S. Aswartham, S. Wurmehl, I. Ko- valchuk, K. Koepernik, C. Timm, B. B¨ uchner, I. C. Fulga, S. Borisenko, and J. van den Brink, Topologi- cal nodal i-wave superconductivity in PtBi2, Nature647, 613 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Zabala, V

    J. Zabala, V. F. Correa, F. J. Castro, and P. Pedrazzini, Enhanced weak superconductivity in trigonalγ-PtBi 2, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter36, 285701 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Schimmel, Y

    S. Schimmel, Y. Fasano, S. Hoffmann, J. Besproswanny, L. T. Corredor Bohorquez, J. Puig, B.-C. Elshalem, B. Kalisky, G. Shipunov, D. Baumann, S. Aswartham, B. B¨ uchner, and C. Hess, Surface superconductivity in the topological Weyl semimetal t-PtBi 2, Nat. Commun. 15, 9895 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Kuibarov, S

    A. Kuibarov, S. Changdar, A. Fedorov, R. Lou, O. Suvorov, V. Misheneva, L. Harnagea, I. Kovalchuk, S. Wurmehl, B. B¨ uchner, and S. Borisenko, Measur- ing superconducting arcs by angle-resolved photoemis- sion spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B112, 144518 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    O’Leary, Z

    E. O’Leary, Z. Li, L.-L. Wang, B. Schrunk, A. Eaton, P. C. Canfield, and A. Kaminski, Topography of Fermi arcs int-PtBi 2 using high-resolution angle-resolved pho- toemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B112, 085154 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Huang, L

    X. Huang, L. Zhao, S. Schimmel, J. Besproswanny, P. H¨ artl, C. Hess, B. B¨ uchner, and M. Bode, Sizable superconducting gap and anisotropic chiral topological superconductivity in the Weyl semimetal PtBi 2 (2025), arXiv:2507.13843

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Hoffmann, S

    S. Hoffmann, S. Schimmel, R. Vocaturo, J. Puig, G. Shipunov, O. Janson, S. Aswartham, D. Baumann, B. B¨ uchner, J. van den Brink, Y. Fasano, J. I. Facio, and C. Hess, Fermi arcs dominating the electronic surface properties of trigonal PtBi 2, Adv. Phys. Res.4, 2400150 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Mæland, M

    K. Mæland, M. Bahari, and B. Trauzettel, Phonon- mediated intrinsic topological superconductivity in Fermi arcs, Phys. Rev. B112, 104507 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    Mæland, G

    K. Mæland, G. Sangiovanni, and B. Trauzettel, Mech- anism for nodal topological superconductivity on PtBi 2 surface, Phys. Rev. Lett.137, 056001 (2026)

    2026

  13. [13]

    Dsouza, N

    R. Dsouza, N. Parthenios, B. M. Andersen, and M. H. Christensen, Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity of Weyl Fermi arcs in PtBi 2 (2026), arXiv:2605.31501

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    Buccheri, A

    F. Buccheri, A. de Martino, and J. van den Brink, Phonon-driven nodal surface superconductivity of Fermi arcs (2026), arXiv:2606.02371

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Jiang, F

    W. Jiang, F. Zhu, P. Li, Y. Li, G. Wang, Q. Jing, W. Gao, M. Tian, J. Ma, W. Zhang, W. Luo, and D. Qian, Elec- tronic structure of non-centrosymmetric PtBi 2 studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, J. Appl. Phys.128, 135103 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Kuibarov, S

    A. Kuibarov, S. Changdar, R. Vocaturo, O. Suvorov, A. Fedorov, R. Lou, M. Krivenkov, L. Harnagea, S. Wurmehl, J. van den Brink, B. B¨ uchner, and S. Borisenko, Three prerequisites for high-temperature superconductivity in t-PtBi 2 (2025), arXiv:2509.02178

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Vocaturo, K

    R. Vocaturo, K. Koepernik, J. I. Facio, C. Timm, I. C. Fulga, O. Janson, and J. van den Brink, Electronic structure of the surface-superconducting Weyl semimetal PtBi2, Phys. Rev. B110, 054504 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Veyrat, V

    A. Veyrat, V. Labracherie, D. L. Bashlakov, F. Caglieris, J. I. Facio, G. Shipunov, T. Charvin, R. Acharya, Y. Naidyuk, R. Giraud, J. van den Brink, B. B¨ uchner, C. Hess, S. Aswartham, and J. Dufouleur, Berezin- skii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition in the type-I Weyl semimetal PtBi2, Nano Lett.23, 1229 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Palumbo, P

    S. Palumbo, P. S. Cornaglia, and J. I. Facio, Interplay between inversion and translation symmetries in trigonal PtBi2, Phys. Rev. B112, 205125 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Veyrat, K

    A. Veyrat, K. Koepernik, L. Veyrat, G. Shipunov, I. Ko- valchuk, S. Aswartham, J. Qu, A. Kumar, M. Ceccardi, F. Caglieris, N. P´ erez, R. Giraud, B. B¨ uchner, J. van den Brink, C. Ortix, and J. Dufouleur, Dissipationless trans- port signature of topological nodal lines, Nat. Commun. 16, 6711 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Majchrzak, C

    P. Majchrzak, C. Sanders, Y. Zhang, A. Kuibarov, O. Suvorov, E. Springate, I. Kovalchuk, S. Aswartham, G. Shipunov, B. B¨ uchner, A. Yaresko, S. Borisenko, and P. Hofmann, Machine-learning approach to understand- ing ultrafast carrier dynamics in the three-dimensional Brillouin zone of PtBi 2, Phys. Rev. Research7, 013025 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Y. Feng, Q. Jiang, B. Feng, M. Yang, T. Xu, W. Liu, X. Yang, M. Arita, E. F. Schwier, K. Shimada, H. O. Jeschke, R. Thomale, Y. Shi, X. Wu, S. Xiao, S. Qiao, and S. He, Rashba-like spin splitting along three momen- tum directions in trigonal layered PtBi 2, Nat. Commun. 10, 4765 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    A. C. Mathisen, X. L. Tan, S. S. Brinkman, K. Mæland, F. G¨ ohler, Øyvind Finnseth, G. Shipunov, F. Pabst, M. A. Lemos, B. Thiagarajan, C. Polley, B. Trauzettel, A. Isaeva, J. I. Facio, and H. Bentmann, Fermiology and spin polarization of topological surface states in PtBi 2 (2026), arXiv:2607.01947

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Thirupathaiah, Y

    S. Thirupathaiah, Y. Kushnirenko, E. Haubold, A. V. Fedorov, E. D. L. Rienks, T. K. Kim, A. N. Yaresko, C. G. F. Blum, S. Aswartham, B. B¨ uchner, and S. V. Borisenko, Possible origin of linear magnetoresistance: Observation of Dirac surface states in layered PtBi 2, Phys. Rev. B97, 035133 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    Q. Yao, Y. P. Du, X. J. Yang, Y. Zheng, D. F. Xu, X. H. Niu, X. P. Shen, H. F. Yang, P. Dudin, T. K. Kim, M. Hoesch, I. Vobornik, Z.-A. Xu, X. G. Wan, D. L. Feng, and D. W. Shen, Bulk and surface electronic structure of hexagonal structured PtBi2 studied by angle- resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B94, 235140 (2016)

    2016

  26. [26]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi, Vesta 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr.44, 1272–1276 (2011)

    2011

  27. [27]

    Shipunov, I

    G. Shipunov, I. Kovalchuk, B. R. Piening, V. Labracherie, A. Veyrat, D. Wolf, A. Lubk, S. Subakti, R. Giraud, J. Dufouleur, S. Shokri, F. Caglieris, C. Hess, D. V. Efremov, B. B¨ uchner, and S. Aswartham, Poly- morphic PtBi2: Growth, structure, and superconducting properties, Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 124202 (2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    Koepernik and H

    K. Koepernik and H. Eschrig, Full-potential nonorthog- onal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme, Phys. Rev. B59, 1743 (1999)

    1999

  29. [29]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996). 10

    1996

  30. [30]

    Koepernik, O

    K. Koepernik, O. Janson, Y. Sun, and J. van den Brink, Symmetry-conserving maximally projected Wan- nier functions, Phys. Rev. B107, 235135 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    Biswas and K

    T. Biswas and K. Schubert, Strukturuntersuchungen in den mischungen Pt-Tl-Pb und Pt-Pb-Bi, J. Less- Common Met.19, 223 (1969)

    1969

  32. [32]

    Kaiser, A

    M. Kaiser, A. I. Baranov, and M. Ruck, Bi 2Pt(hP9) by low-temperature reduction of Bi13Pt3I7: Reinvestigation of the crystal structure and chemical bonding analysis, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.640, 2742 (2014)

    2014

  33. [33]

    W. Gao, X. Zhu, F. Zheng, M. Wu, J. Zhang, C. Xi, P. Zhang, Y. Zhang, N. Hao, W. Ning, and M. Tian, A possible candidate for triply degenerate point fermions in trigonal layered PtBi 2, Nat. Commun.9, 3249 (2018)

    2018

  34. [34]

    Tusche, P

    C. Tusche, P. Goslawski, D. Kutnyakhov, M. Ellguth, K. Medjanik, H. Elmers, S. Chernov, R. Wallauer, D. En- gel, A. Jankowiak, and G. Sch¨ onhense, Multi-MHz time- of-flight electronic bandstructure imaging of graphene on Ir(111), Appl. Phys. Lett.108(2016)

    2016

  35. [35]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL to be inserted by publisher]

  36. [36]

    Damascelli, Probing the electronic structure of com- plex systems by ARPES, Physica Scripta2004, 61 (2004)

    A. Damascelli, Probing the electronic structure of com- plex systems by ARPES, Physica Scripta2004, 61 (2004)

    2004

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.5 on July 30, 2026.