Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Anatomy of Family Trees in Cosmological Correlators

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a family tree—a multivariate hypergeometric function arising from time-ordered integrals in cosmological correlators—is singular exactly when a root-bearing partial energy tends to zero or infinity, and derives…

desk verdict A serious, technically rich paper on family-tree singularities; the completeness claim rests on one unproven Landau step that should be tightened but is likely correct. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02684 v1 pith:XXSSSQWL submitted 2025-09-02 hep-th astro-ph.COhep-ph

Bingchu Fan , Zhong-Zhi Xianyu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thastro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords familytreescosmologicalcorrelatorsmultivariatehypergeometricfunctionsMellin-Barnesintegralsanalyticcontinuationfactorizationtheoremtime-orderedsingularitystructure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to give a complete local description of family trees—the multivariate hypergeometric functions produced by the recently introduced family-tree decomposition of time-ordered multilayer integrals in cosmological correlators. The central claim is that a family tree, viewed as a function of complex energies, is singular exactly when the sum of energies over a connected subgraph containing the root goes to zero or to infinity, and that no other singularities exist. Around every such point the paper constructs explicit hypergeometric series with finite convergence domains, including a large partial-energy series, a small partial-energy series, and a factorization theorem asserting that the singular part at a zero partial-energy limit factorizes into subgraph contributions to all orders. These expansions matter because the family trees are the building blocks of tree-level massive correlators; knowing their singularities and having local series at each singularity makes the functions analytically controllable rather than opaque special functions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Mellin-Barnes representation of family trees, used a second time inside the time integral. By integrating the nested time integral layer by layer and resolving the resulting special functions (exponential integrals or confluent hypergeometric functions) into gamma-function products, an arbitrary family tree becomes a multi-fold Mellin-Barnes integral in which energies appear only as ratio powers and twists as gamma-function arguments. The paper evaluates these integrals with a pole-collecting algorithm: after choosing a total order of the energy magnitudes, one selects the set of gamma-function pole families whose residue series is formally convergent, and the paper proves this algebraic selection is equivalent to the geometric conic-hull method. The flexibility to resolve the special functions completely or partially—and to collect or not collect energies along lines—is what enables reaching every singularity, not just the previously known large-single-energy and large-total-energy expansions.

What would settle it

Compute the three-site star family tree $[1(2)(3)]$ along a curve where the non-root partial energy $\omega_2+\omega_3$ goes to zero while $\omega_1$, $\omega_{12}$, $\omega_{13}$, and $\omega_{123}$ stay finite; the completeness claim predicts a regular function there, so any divergence or branch cut on that curve would refute it. A second check is to verify numerically that the small partial-energy series (68) converges in a nonzero neighborhood of a zero partial-energy point, since the paper leaves the exact convergence boundary open.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Result 1 of the paper states: a family tree has a singularity in the complex energy space if and only if the total energy of a root-bearing subgraph goes to zero or to infinity. The argument converts the time-ordered integral into an energy integral through a Fourier transform, applies a standard Landau singularity analysis to the poles of that integrand, and finds only endpoint singularities controlled by successive sums of energies starting at the root. At each infinite partial-energy singularity the whole family tree is a single multivariate hypergeometric series times a complex power (Eq. 36), with the nonanalyticity entirely in the power. At each zero partial-energy singularity the tree splits into a universal singular piece—a hypergeometric series times a singular power—plus regular pieces whose form depends on the ordering of the remaining energies (Eq. 68). A corollary is the factorization theorem (Eq. 70): at a zero partial-energy limit the singular part of the whole tree is the singular part of the root-bearing subgraph multiplied by the product of the untouched subgraphs, to all orders in the small partial energy. In twist space the singularities are only simple poles from gamma factors, and the regularized family trees are entire functions of all twists.

Load-bearing premise

The completeness of the singularity list rests on the assertion that the branch points of the energy-integral representation are inert—they sit at fixed positions and do not move with the external energies—so that only pole pinches can create singularities; if that assertion fails, singularities beyond the listed zero or infinite root-containing partial-energy sums would exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every family tree now has a convergent hypergeometric expansion in the neighborhood of each of its singularities, so analytic continuation across the energy space can be assembled from local data.
  • The previously unproved large total-energy series (Eq. 34) is proved as a special case of the general infinite partial-energy expansion.
  • At zero partial energies the singular part factorizes to all orders into the singular subgraph times the disjoint subgraphs, so power-law divergences of the full tree are localized in a single subgraph.
  • Removing gamma factors leaves regularized family trees that are entire functions of all twists, so the twist-space singularity structure is exactly those simple poles.
  • The results supply the local singular data needed to reconstruct correlators by dispersion and to seed numerical evaluation of these hypergeometric functions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same Mellin-Barnes plus pole-collecting strategy should apply to massive family trees used for full massive correlators, so the singularity classification and the factorization theorem would likely survive that extension; the paper only suggests this as future work.
  • Editorial inference: because the new series provide boundary data at every singularity, computing their exact convergence radii via Stirling asymptotics is a concrete next test of how much of energy space these expansions actually cover.
  • Editorial inference: the factorization theorem at zero partial energies suggests that the nonanalytic part of a cosmological correlator is determined entirely by the singular subgraph, giving a direct physical picture of divergent limits as on-shell processes localized in that subgraph.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the analytic structure of 'family trees', the multivariate hypergeometric functions that arise as canonical building blocks of tree-level cosmological correlators after the family-tree decomposition. It claims a complete characterization of singularities in energy space: a family tree is singular exactly when the sum of energies of a root-bearing connected subgraph tends to zero or infinity (Result 1, Sec. 3). For each such singularity it derives hypergeometric series expansions: Eq. (36) for infinite partial energies, Eq. (68) for zero partial energies, with the small total-energy expansion (47) as a special case. It also proves a factorization theorem (Eq. (70)) stating that the singular part at a zero partial-energy limit factorizes into subgraphs to all orders, and shows that regularized family trees are entire functions of the twist parameters (Sec. 7). The technical engine is a Mellin-Barnes representation of the time integrals, evaluated by a pole-collecting algorithm whose equivalence to the conic-hull method is proved in App. D; the results are cross-checked on many examples in App. E. As a byproduct, the paper supplies a proof of the previously unproved large total-energy series (34).

Significance. If the completeness claim holds, this is a substantial contribution to the analytical theory of cosmological correlators: it converts the singularity structure of a large class of hypergeometric functions into explicit, parameter-free local series, which can serve as boundary data for dispersive bootstrap and numerical evaluation. The derivations are unusually explicit, with a systematic pole-collecting algorithm, a proof of equivalence to the conic-hull method, and many fully worked examples in App. E. The main caveat is that the 'only if' direction of the singularity classification rests on an unproven extension of Landau analysis to an integrand with branch points; this is a correctness-risk point that the authors should repair or explicitly qualify. Conditional on that repair, the paper's results would justify the advertised applications.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, Result 1 (Eq. (29))] The completeness ('only if') direction of the singularity classification is obtained by applying Landau analysis to the energy integral (29), whose integrand contains branch points at ϵ_i = 0 and ϵ_i = ∞ in addition to the moving poles. The manuscript asserts that these branch points are 'inert' and 'do not move with external variables', and therefore that 'the Landau analysis is still applicable', but no proof or precise supporting theorem is given; the reference to a modified analysis in [77] is not developed. Because the exhaustiveness of the series in (36), (68), and the factorization theorem (70) depends on this classification, the 'only if' direction is currently unproven. Please provide a direct pinch analysis of the Mellin-Barnes integral, or quote a theorem covering integrands with fixed algebraic branch points, or explicitly restrict Result 1 to the directions that are proven.
  2. [Sec. 2.3 and App. D] The paper defines 'formally convergent' series and states that the exact convergence boundary is left to future work (Sec. 2.3), yet Results 2–4 claim exact series representations with finite convergent domains. The conic-hull equivalence in App. D establishes formal convergence only; it does not prove that the resulting multivariate series converges in any open neighborhood of the singular point. Since the local-expansion claim is load-bearing, please provide or cite a convergence theorem for balanced multifold Mellin-Barnes integrals of the type (23), or state the convergence guarantee as an explicit assumption throughout the statements of Results 2–4.
  3. [Sec. 6, Factorization theorem (Eq. (70))] The proof of the factorization theorem relies in Step 3 on 'the analysis of Sec. 3' to conclude that only the fully factorized term can be singular at ω_G → 0. This makes the theorem contingent on the same unproven Landau completeness argument identified in the first comment. If the singularity classification is repaired, the factorization argument is sound; as written, the theorem is not an independent proof. Please either prove the needed direction of the classification within the theorem's proof or cite a verification that the Landau criterion applies to the integral (29).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.3, Eq. (50)] The notation in (50) omits the (2πi)^{-(N-M)} factors and contour specifications that are explicit in (23); please make the measure and contours unambiguous for reproducibility.
  2. [Footnote 6, Sec. 5.1] The Pochhammer symbol is defined as (q)_n = Γ(q+n)/Γ(q) in Eq. (82), but footnote 6 writes (a)_n ≡ Γ(a+n)/Γ(n); this is a typo and should be corrected.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. 2.3] The phrase 'series with finite convergent domains' in the abstract is stronger than what is established in Sec. 2.3, where the exact boundary is left to future work; consider wording such as 'finite, not fully characterized, convergence domains'.
  4. [Figures 4–6] The text repeatedly refers to Figs. 4–6 for the pole-collecting algorithms, but the corresponding figure content is not visible in the body text provided; please ensure the figures are present, legible, and captioned so that the pole choices are self-explanatory.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the new series and factorization theorem are derived from Mellin-Barnes pole collecting; prior-work citations are setup-level or re-proven here.

full rationale

The paper's central results (Results 1 through 5) are not assumed from prior work. The Mellin-Barnes representation (23) is constructed in Sec. 2.3, and the large single-energy series (32), the large total-energy series (34), the large partial-energy series (36), the small total-energy series (47), the small partial-energy series (68), and the factorization theorem (70) are each obtained by explicit residue/pole collection from the MB integrand, with formal convergence checked by the algebraic procedure in App. D. In particular, Eq. (34), stated without proof in [76], is proven here by summing residues of (33), and Eq. (32) is re-derived from (31) rather than imported. The definition of family trees and the chain decomposition (25) are taken from [75,76], but these are algebraic setup identities, not the conclusions being derived. The potentially load-bearing external input is the Sec. 3 claim that Landau analysis remains applicable despite branch points in the energy integrand (29), with footnote 5 referring to the authors' prior work [77] for a modified Landau analysis; this is an unproven technical assumption and a correctness/rigor risk for the completeness direction of Result 1, but it is not a circular reduction, since the singularity classification is not defined in terms of the conclusion and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper also explicitly defers the exact convergence boundary to future work (Sec. 2.3), which is an acknowledged limitation rather than circularity. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on no fitted parameters and no new physical entities. The mathematical assumptions are standard analytic-continuation and residue techniques, plus two domain assumptions about the applicability of Landau analysis and the meaning of formal convergence that the paper itself flags as not fully resolved.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Landau analysis remains applicable to the energy integral (29) even though the integrand has branch points, because the branch points are inert at ϵ_i = 0 and ∞.
    Invoked in Sec. 3 to prove that all singularities are endpoint singularities of root-bearing partial energies. If false, pinched branch-point singularities could exist and the completeness of the singularity classification would fail.
  • standard math The Mellin-Barnes integrand in (23) is balanced and polynomially bounded at infinity, so the convergence of the resulting series is controlled by the energy-ratio power factors.
    Stated in Sec. 2.3 after Eq. (23); used to justify the algebraic pole-collecting procedure. It is plausible by Stirling analysis but not proven in detail in the paper.
  • domain assumption The formal convergence criterion |z'_k| < 1 from the pole-collecting algorithm implies actual convergence of the series in some finite subdomain around each singularity.
    Bridge between derived series and the claim of finite convergent domains. The paper explicitly notes only a finite subdomain is guaranteed and the exact boundary is left to future work (Sec. 2.3, Sec. 4.1).
  • standard math Standard results of complex analysis and special functions: residue theorem, Gamma reflection identity, regularity of regularized hypergeometric functions, and MB representations of confluent and Gauss hypergeometric functions.
    Used throughout the derivations; collected in App. B. These are uncontroversial background results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anatomy of Family Trees in Cosmological Correlators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XXSSSQWL

@misc{pith2026250902684,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anatomy of Family Trees in Cosmological Correlators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XXSSSQWL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02684}
}
read the original abstract

The time-ordered multilayer integrals have long been cited as major challenges in the analytical study of cosmological correlators and wavefunction coefficients. The recently proposed family tree decomposition technique solved these time integrals in terms of canonical objects called family trees, which are multivariate hypergeometric functions with energies as variables and twists as parameters. In this work, we provide a systematic study of the analytical properties of family trees. By exploiting the great flexibility of Mellin representations of family trees, we identify and characterize all their singularities in both variables and parameters and find their exact series representations around all singularities with finite convergent domains. These series automatically generate analytical continuation of arbitrary family trees over many distinct regions in the energy space. As a corollary, we show the factorization of family trees at zero partial-energy singularities to all orders. Our findings offer essential analytical data for further understanding and computing cosmological correlators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02684 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. The relation between the time-ordered integral and the contour prescription in the 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. All subgraphs of the family tree 1(2)(3(4)(5)) which give rise to singularities when the total-energy of the subgraph goes to zero or infinity. will also derive series representations in the infinite limit of an arbitrary root-bearing connected partial energy, which are new results. In all cases, the series representations are rather simple in the sense that there is only one hypergeometric series involved at a time… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The pole collecting algorithm for the MB integral of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The pole collecting algorithm for the MB integral of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The pole collecting algorithm for the MB integral of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The labeling of the family tree F = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_7.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. All Tree-Level Massive Cosmological Correlators via Spectral Gluing

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Tree-level massive de Sitter correlators are constructed by gluing Lauricella-type vertex functions according to graph combinatorics, and the hypergeometric content collapses to rational functions once the dynamical p...

  2. Cosmological Correlators in KLF and the Double-Exchange

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The double-exchange cosmological correlator is computed in KLF space, yielding a double series over hypergeometric functions that improves on prior four-layer representations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 88 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [77]

    Dispersive Bootstrap of Massive Inflation Correlators,

    H. Liu, Z. Qin, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Dispersive Bootstrap of Massive Inflation Correlators,” arXiv:2407.12299 [hep-th] . 57

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Large non-Gaussianities with Intermediate Shapes from Quasi-Single Field Inflation,

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Large non-Gaussianities with Intermediate Shapes from Quasi-Single Field Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 063511, arXiv:0909.0496 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2010

  3. [2]

    Quasi-Single Field Inflation and Non-Gaussianities,

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Quasi-Single Field Inflation and Non-Gaussianities,” JCAP 1004 (2010) 027, arXiv:0911.3380 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2010

  4. [3]

    Cosmological Collider Physics,

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, “Cosmological Collider Physics,” arXiv:1503.08043 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    Loop Corrections to Standard Model Fields in Inflation,

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Loop Corrections to Standard Model Fields in Inflation,” JHEP 08 (2016) 051, arXiv:1604.07841 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [5]

    Standard Model Background of the Cosmological Collider,

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Standard Model Background of the Cosmological Collider,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 no. 26, (2017) 261302, arXiv:1610.06597 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  7. [6]

    Standard Model Mass Spectrum in Inflationary Universe,

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Standard Model Mass Spectrum in Inflationary Universe,” JHEP 04 (2017) 058, arXiv:1612.08122 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [7]

    Non-Gaussianity as a Particle Detector,

    H. Lee, D. Baumann, and G. L. Pimentel, “Non-Gaussianity as a Particle Detector,” JHEP 12 (2016) 040, arXiv:1607.03735 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2016

Show all 93 references
  1. [8]

    Quasi Single Field Inflation in the non-perturbative regime,

    H. An, M. McAneny, A. K. Ridgway, and M. B. Wise, “Quasi Single Field Inflation in the non-perturbative regime,” JHEP 06 (2018) 105, arXiv:1706.09971 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Strongly Coupled Quasi-Single Field Inflation,

    A. V. Iyer, S. Pi, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, and S. Zhou, “Strongly Coupled Quasi-Single Field Inflation,” JCAP 1801 no. 01, (2018) 041, arXiv:1710.03054 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Heavy-Lifting of Gauge Theories By Cosmic Inflation,

    S. Kumar and R. Sundrum, “Heavy-Lifting of Gauge Theories By Cosmic Inflation,” JHEP 05 (2018) 011, arXiv:1711.03988 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Unsuppressed primordial standard clocks in warm quasi-single field inflation,

    X. Tong, Y. Wang, and S. Zhou, “Unsuppressed primordial standard clocks in warm quasi-single field inflation,” JCAP 1806 no. 06, (2018) 013, arXiv:1801.05688 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Quantum Standard Clocks in the Primordial Trispectrum,

    X. Chen, W. Z. Chua, Y. Guo, Y. Wang, Z.-Z. Xianyu, and T. Xie, “Quantum Standard Clocks in the Primordial Trispectrum,” JCAP 1805 no. 05, (2018) 049, arXiv:1803.04412 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Neutrino Signatures in Primordial Non-Gaussianities,

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Neutrino Signatures in Primordial Non-Gaussianities,” JHEP 09 (2018) 022, arXiv:1805.02656 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Higgs as heavy-lifted physics during inflation,

    Y.-P. Wu, “Higgs as heavy-lifted physics during inflation,” JHEP 04 (2019) 125, arXiv:1812.10654 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Heavy Particle Signatures in Cosmological Correlation Functions with Tensor Modes,

    R. Saito and T. Kubota, “Heavy Particle Signatures in Cosmological Correlation Functions with Tensor Modes,” JCAP 06 (2018) 009, arXiv:1804.06974 [hep-th] . 53

    2018 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Gravitational Production of Superheavy Dark Matter and Associated Cosmological Signatures,

    L. Li, T. Nakama, C. M. Sou, Y. Wang, and S. Zhou, “Gravitational Production of Superheavy Dark Matter and Associated Cosmological Signatures,” JHEP 07 (2019) 067, arXiv:1903.08842 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [17]

    A Cosmological Higgs Collider,

    S. Lu, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “A Cosmological Higgs Collider,” JHEP 02 (2020) 011, arXiv:1907.07390 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Probing P and CP Violations on the Cosmological Collider,

    T. Liu, X. Tong, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Probing P and CP Violations on the Cosmological Collider,” JHEP 04 (2020) 189, arXiv:1909.01819 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Searches for other vacua. Part II. A new Higgstory at the cosmological collider,

    A. Hook, J. Huang, and D. Racco, “Searches for other vacua. Part II. A new Higgstory at the cosmological collider,” JHEP 01 (2020) 105, arXiv:1907.10624 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Minimal signatures of the Standard Model in non-Gaussianities,

    A. Hook, J. Huang, and D. Racco, “Minimal signatures of the Standard Model in non-Gaussianities,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 2, (2020) 023519, arXiv:1908.00019 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Seeing Higher-Dimensional Grand Unification In Primordial Non-Gaussianities,

    S. Kumar and R. Sundrum, “Seeing Higher-Dimensional Grand Unification In Primordial Non-Gaussianities,” JHEP 04 (2019) 120, arXiv:1811.11200 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Cosmological Collider Physics and the Curvaton,

    S. Kumar and R. Sundrum, “Cosmological Collider Physics and the Curvaton,” JHEP 04 (2020) 077, arXiv:1908.11378 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [23]

    In Search of Large Signals at the Cosmological Collider,

    L.-T. Wang and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “In Search of Large Signals at the Cosmological Collider,” JHEP 02 (2020) 044, arXiv:1910.12876 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Cosmological Collider Signatures of Massive Vectors from Non-Gaussian Gravitational Waves,

    Y. Wang and Y. Zhu, “Cosmological Collider Signatures of Massive Vectors from Non-Gaussian Gravitational Waves,” JCAP 04 (2020) 049, arXiv:2001.03879 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Cosmological Signatures of Superheavy Dark Matter,

    L. Li, S. Lu, Y. Wang, and S. Zhou, “Cosmological Signatures of Superheavy Dark Matter,” JHEP 07 (2020) 231, arXiv:2002.01131 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Gauge Boson Signals at the Cosmological Collider,

    L.-T. Wang and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Gauge Boson Signals at the Cosmological Collider,” JHEP 11 (2020) 082, arXiv:2004.02887 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Disentangling mass spectra of multiple fields in cosmological collider,

    S. Aoki and M. Yamaguchi, “Disentangling mass spectra of multiple fields in cosmological collider,” JHEP 04 (2021) 127, arXiv:2012.13667 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [28]

    The Scalar Chemical Potential in Cosmological Collider Physics,

    A. Bodas, S. Kumar, and R. Sundrum, “The Scalar Chemical Potential in Cosmological Collider Physics,” JHEP 02 (2021) 079, arXiv:2010.04727 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Axion isocurvature collider,

    S. Lu, “Axion isocurvature collider,” JHEP 04 (2022) 157, arXiv:2103.05958 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Chemical-potential-assisted particle production in FRW spacetimes,

    C. M. Sou, X. Tong, and Y. Wang, “Chemical-potential-assisted particle production in FRW spacetimes,” JHEP 06 (2021) 129, arXiv:2104.08772 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Missing scalars at the cosmological collider,

    Q. Lu, M. Reece, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Missing scalars at the cosmological collider,” JHEP 12 (2021) 098, arXiv:2108.11385 [hep-ph] . 54

    2021 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Inflationary flavor oscillations and the cosmic spectroscopy,

    L. Pinol, S. Aoki, S. Renaux-Petel, and M. Yamaguchi, “Inflationary flavor oscillations and the cosmic spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 2, (2023) L021301, arXiv:2112.05710 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Probing Leptogenesis with the Cosmological Collider,

    Y. Cui and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Probing Leptogenesis with the Cosmological Collider,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 11, (2022) 111301, arXiv:2112.10793 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Large spin-2 signals at the cosmological collider,

    X. Tong and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Large spin-2 signals at the cosmological collider,” JHEP 10 (2022) 194, arXiv:2203.06349 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Large-field inflation and the cosmological collider,

    M. Reece, L.-T. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Large-field inflation and the cosmological collider,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 10, (2023) L101304, arXiv:2204.11869 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Classical cosmological collider physics and primordial features,

    X. Chen, R. Ebadi, and S. Kumar, “Classical cosmological collider physics and primordial features,” JCAP 08 (2022) 083, arXiv:2205.01107 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Gravitational wave probes of massive gauge bosons at the cosmological collider,

    X. Niu, M. H. Rahat, K. Srinivasan, and W. Xue, “Gravitational wave probes of massive gauge bosons at the cosmological collider,” JCAP 02 (2023) 013, arXiv:2211.14331 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [38]

    New inflationary probes of axion dark matter,

    X. Chen, J. Fan, and L. Li, “New inflationary probes of axion dark matter,” JHEP 12 (2023) 197, arXiv:2303.03406 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Light scalars at the cosmological collider,

    P. Chakraborty and J. Stout, “Light scalars at the cosmological collider,” JHEP 02 (2024) 021, arXiv:2310.01494 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [40]

    BCS in the sky: signatures of inflationary fermion condensation,

    X. Tong, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Zhu, “BCS in the sky: signatures of inflationary fermion condensation,” JCAP 04 (2024) 022, arXiv:2304.09428 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Shapes of the cosmological low-speed collider,

    S. Jazayeri, S. Renaux-Petel, and D. Werth, “Shapes of the cosmological low-speed collider,” JCAP 12 (2023) 035, arXiv:2307.01751 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Parity violation from emergent nonlocality during inflation,

    S. Jazayeri, S. Renaux-Petel, X. Tong, D. Werth, and Y. Zhu, “Parity violation from emergent nonlocality during inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 12, (2023) 123523, arXiv:2308.11315 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Continuous spectrum on cosmological collider,

    S. Aoki, “Continuous spectrum on cosmological collider,” JCAP 04 (2023) 002, arXiv:2301.07920 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [44]

    A cosmological tachyon collider: enhancing the long-short scale coupling,

    C. McCulloch, E. Pajer, and X. Tong, “A cosmological tachyon collider: enhancing the long-short scale coupling,” JHEP 05 (2024) 262, arXiv:2401.11009 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [45]

    An Effective Cosmological Collider,

    N. Craig, S. Kumar, and A. McCune, “An Effective Cosmological Collider,” arXiv:2401.10976 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  39. [46]

    The UV Sensitivity of Axion Monodromy Inflation,

    E. Pajer, D.-G. Wang, and B. Zhang, “The UV Sensitivity of Axion Monodromy Inflation,” arXiv:2412.05762 [hep-th] . 55

    arXiv

  40. [47]

    Bootstrapping the Cosmological Collider with Resonant Features,

    D.-G. Wang and B. Zhang, “Bootstrapping the Cosmological Collider with Resonant Features,” arXiv:2505.19066 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  41. [48]

    Charged Loops at the Cosmological Collider with Chemical Potential,

    A. Bodas, E. Broadberry, R. Sundrum, and Z. Xu, “Charged Loops at the Cosmological Collider with Chemical Potential,” arXiv:2507.22978 [hep-ph]

  42. [49]

    Searching for Cosmological Collider in the Planck CMB Data,

    W. Sohn, D.-G. Wang, J. R. Fergusson, and E. P. S. Shellard, “Searching for Cosmological Collider in the Planck CMB Data,” arXiv:2404.07203 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  43. [50]

    BOSS Constraints on Massive Particles during Inflation: The Cosmological Collider in Action,

    G. Cabass, O. H. E. Philcox, M. M. Ivanov, K. Akitsu, S.-F. Chen, M. Simonovi´ c, and M. Zaldarriaga, “BOSS Constraints on Massive Particles during Inflation: The Cosmological Collider in Action,” arXiv:2404.01894 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  44. [51]

    Anatomy of Parity-violating Trispectra in Galaxy Surveys,

    Y. Bao, L.-T. Wang, Z.-Z. Xianyu, and Y.-M. Zhong, “Anatomy of Parity-violating Trispectra in Galaxy Surveys,” arXiv:2504.02931 [astro-ph.CO]

  45. [52]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami et al., “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10, arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [53]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters,

    ACT Collaboration, T. Louis et al., “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters,” arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  47. [54]

    Inflation: Theory and Observations,

    A. Ach´ ucarroet al., “Inflation: Theory and Observations,” arXiv:2203.08128 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  48. [55]

    Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity,

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami et al., “Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A9, arXiv:1905.05697 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Schwinger-Keldysh Diagrammatics for Primordial Perturbations,

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Schwinger-Keldysh Diagrammatics for Primordial Perturbations,” JCAP 1712 no. 12, (2017) 006, arXiv:1703.10166 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [57]

    The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities,” JHEP 04 (2020) 105, arXiv:1811.00024 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [58]

    The cosmological bootstrap: weight-shifting operators and scalar seeds,

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “The cosmological bootstrap: weight-shifting operators and scalar seeds,” JHEP 12 (2020) 204, arXiv:1910.14051 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Boostless cosmological collider bootstrap,

    G. L. Pimentel and D.-G. Wang, “Boostless cosmological collider bootstrap,” JHEP 10 (2022) 177, arXiv:2205.00013 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Cosmological bootstrap in slow motion,

    S. Jazayeri and S. Renaux-Petel, “Cosmological bootstrap in slow motion,” JHEP 12 (2022) 137, arXiv:2205.10340 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Helical inflation correlators: partial Mellin-Barnes and bootstrap equations,

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Helical inflation correlators: partial Mellin-Barnes and bootstrap equations,” JHEP 04 (2023) 059, arXiv:2208.13790 [hep-th] . 56

    2023 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Closed-form formulae for inflation correlators,

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Closed-form formulae for inflation correlators,” JHEP 07 (2023) 001, arXiv:2301.07047 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Analytic formulae for inflationary correlators with dynamical mass,

    S. Aoki, T. Noumi, F. Sano, and M. Yamaguchi, “Analytic formulae for inflationary correlators with dynamical mass,” JHEP 03 (2024) 073, arXiv:2312.09642 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Cosmological Correlators with Double Massive Exchanges: Bootstrap Equation and Phenomenology,

    S. Aoki, L. Pinol, F. Sano, M. Yamaguchi, and Y. Zhu, “Cosmological Correlators with Double Massive Exchanges: Bootstrap Equation and Phenomenology,” arXiv:2404.09547 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  58. [65]

    Multivariate hypergeometric solutions of cosmological (dS) correlators by d log-form differential equations,

    J. Chen, B. Feng, and Y.-X. Tao, “Multivariate hypergeometric solutions of cosmological (dS) correlators by d log-form differential equations,” arXiv:2411.03088 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  59. [66]

    Massive Inflationary Amplitudes: Differential Equations and Complete Solutions for General Trees,

    H. Liu and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Massive Inflationary Amplitudes: Differential Equations and Complete Solutions for General Trees,” arXiv:2412.07843 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  60. [67]

    A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators,

    C. Sleight, “A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators,” JHEP 01 (2020) 090, arXiv:1906.12302 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space,” JHEP 02 (2020) 098, arXiv:1907.01143 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  62. [69]

    From AdS to dS exchanges: Spectral representation, Mellin amplitudes, and crossing,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “From AdS to dS exchanges: Spectral representation, Mellin amplitudes, and crossing,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) L081902, arXiv:2007.09993 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  63. [70]

    From dS to AdS and back,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “From dS to AdS and back,” JHEP 12 (2021) 074, arXiv:2109.02725 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Phase information in cosmological collider signals,

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Phase information in cosmological collider signals,” JHEP 10 (2022) 192, arXiv:2205.01692 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Inflation correlators at the one-loop order: nonanalyticity, factorization, cutting rule, and OPE,

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Inflation correlators at the one-loop order: nonanalyticity, factorization, cutting rule, and OPE,” JHEP 09 (2023) 116, arXiv:2304.13295 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Nonanalyticity and on-shell factorization of inflation correlators at all loop orders,

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Nonanalyticity and on-shell factorization of inflation correlators at all loop orders,” JHEP 01 (2024) 168, arXiv:2308.14802 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Cosmological Correlators at the Loop Level,

    Z. Qin, “Cosmological Correlators at the Loop Level,” arXiv:2411.13636 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  68. [75]

    Inflation correlators with multiple massive exchanges,

    Z.-Z. Xianyu and J. Zang, “Inflation correlators with multiple massive exchanges,” JHEP 03 (2024) 070, arXiv:2309.10849 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Cosmological Amplitudes in Power-Law FRW Universe,

    B. Fan and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Cosmological Amplitudes in Power-Law FRW Universe,” arXiv:2403.07050 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    Spectral Representation of Cosmological Correlators,

    D. Werth, “Spectral Representation of Cosmological Correlators,” arXiv:2409.02072 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Bootstrapping one-loop inflation correlators with the spectral decomposition,

    Z.-Z. Xianyu and H. Zhang, “Bootstrapping one-loop inflation correlators with the spectral decomposition,” JHEP 04 (2023) 103, arXiv:2211.03810 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Dimensional Regularization of Bubble Diagrams in de Sitter Spacetime,

    H. Zhang, “Dimensional Regularization of Bubble Diagrams in de Sitter Spacetime,” arXiv:2507.19318 [hep-th]

  73. [81]

    Differential Equations for Cosmological Correlators,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, A. Hillman, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “Differential Equations for Cosmological Correlators,” arXiv:2312.05303 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Kinematic Flow and the Emergence of Time,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, A. Hillman, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “Kinematic Flow and the Emergence of Time,” arXiv:2312.05300 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Differential equations and recursive solutions for cosmological amplitudes,

    S. He, X. Jiang, J. Liu, Q. Yang, and Y.-Q. Zhang, “Differential equations and recursive solutions for cosmological amplitudes,” arXiv:2407.17715 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefunction of the Universe,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, P. Benincasa, and A. Postnikov, “Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefunction of the Universe,” arXiv:1709.02813 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  77. [85]

    Hypergeometrische funktionen zweier ver¨ anderlichen,

    J. Horn, “Hypergeometrische funktionen zweier ver¨ anderlichen,”Mathematische Annalen 105 no. 1, (1931) 381–407

    1931

  78. [86]

    Multiple Series Representations of N-fold Mellin-Barnes Integrals,

    B. Ananthanarayan, S. Banik, S. Friot, and S. Ghosh, “Multiple Series Representations of N-fold Mellin-Barnes Integrals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 15, (2021) 151601, arXiv:2012.15108 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Multiple Mellin-Barnes integrals and triangulations of point configurations,

    S. Banik and S. Friot, “Multiple Mellin-Barnes integrals and triangulations of point configurations,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 3, (2024) 036002, arXiv:2309.00409 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    R. J. Eden, P. V. Landshoff, D. I. Olive, and J. C. Polkinghorne, The analytic S-matrix . Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1966

    1966

  81. [89]

    Symbol Recursion for the dS Wave Function,

    A. Hillman, “Symbol Recursion for the dS Wave Function,” arXiv:1912.09450 [hep-th]

    1912 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Precision calculation of inflation correlators at one loop,

    L.-T. Wang, Z.-Z. Xianyu, and Y.-M. Zhong, “Precision calculation of inflation correlators at one loop,” JHEP 02 (2022) 085, arXiv:2109.14635 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Cosmological Flow of Primordial Correlators,

    D. Werth, L. Pinol, and S. Renaux-Petel, “Cosmological Flow of Primordial Correlators,” arXiv:2302.00655 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    The Cosmological Flow: A Systematic Approach to Primordial Correlators,

    L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel, and D. Werth, “The Cosmological Flow: A Systematic Approach to Primordial Correlators,” arXiv:2312.06559 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    CosmoFlow: Python Package for Cosmological Correlators,

    D. Werth, L. Pinol, and S. Renaux-Petel, “CosmoFlow: Python Package for Cosmological Correlators,” arXiv:2402.03693 [astro-ph.CO] . 58

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.