The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2607.05327 · v1 · pith:FSVPLR7B · submitted 2026-07-06 · hep-th · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

Cosmological Correlators in KLF and the Double-Exchange

Nathan Belrhali , Arthur Poisson , S\'ebastien Renaux-Petel This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith2026-07-07 17:02 UTCglm-5.2pith:FSVPLR7Bopen to challenge →

classification hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords functionscosmologicalseriesallowsbackgroundcomputationcorrelatorcorrelators
0
0 comments X

The pith

Double-exchange correlator reduced to double series

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves that tree-level cosmological correlators involving two massive exchanged particles can be computed directly from frequency-space integrals by contour integration, without solving differential equations. The key objects carrying the computation are vertex functions — integrals over modified Bessel functions that encode how quantum fields interact at each vertex in de Sitter space. The authors derive two complementary representations of these functions: an integral form (used to extract large-frequency decay rates that dictate contour closure) and a series form in terms of Lauricella hypergeometric functions (used to locate poles and compute residues). Armed with these properties, each frequency integral is performed by closing a contour in the complex plane and collecting residues, which fall into two physically distinct categories: background residues from vertex-function poles and signal residues from the iε-prescription in propagators, the latter encoding the cosmological collider signal of on-shell massive particle exchange. Applied to the double-exchange diagram, the procedure yields a result expressed at most as a double series over Gauss hypergeometric and Appell F4 functions, improving on prior representations that required up to four summation layers.

Core claim

The central mechanism is that vertex functions for any number of fields have only simple poles in the complex frequency plane, whose locations and residues are fully determined by the Gamma-function prefactor in their Lauricella series representation, while their large-frequency asymptotic behavior — derived from the integral representation — provides a systematic contour-closure prescription. This combination allows each layer of a multi-frequency integral to be evaluated by residue collection, reducing the double-exchange diagram to a double series. A recurring simplification is that residues from the measure factor μ/sinh(πμ) cancel pairwise against connection-formula counterparts at each

What carries the argument

The vertex function Id, defined as an integral over modified Bessel functions Kiμ, and its dual representation as a dressed Lauricella FC series obtained via Mellin-Barnes transform. The pole structure is governed entirely by Gamma-function factors; the asymptotic behavior is extracted by replacing Bessel functions with their large-argument forms and using the Legendre Q integral representation. Connection formulas between vertex functions with different Bessel-type indices (K↔I) are derived from the Bessel connection formula and are essential for obtaining tractable contour prescriptions.

If this is right

  • The method generalizes to arbitrary tree-level diagrams with multiple massive exchanges, since the vertex-function analytic properties are derived for any number of fields N, not just the N=4 case of the double-exchange diagram.
  • The background/signal decomposition at each integration layer provides a systematic way to isolate cosmological collider signals — the oscillatory features encoding on-shell particle masses — from smooth background contributions, diagram by diagram.
  • The reduction from four summation layers to two suggests that the KLF contour method may yield more compact representations than differential-equation-based approaches for diagrams of comparable complexity.
  • The one-fold Mellin-Barnes representation for vertex functions provides a kinematics-independent evaluation route that could serve as a numerical fallback when series convergence fails.

Load-bearing premise

The Lauricella series representation of vertex functions converges only when the sum of N−1 momenta is less than the Nth momentum, and the authors compute under this condition then analytically continue afterward. For some components of the double-exchange result, a non-terminating Appell F4 function survives outside its convergence domain, requiring a Mellin-Barnes representation for numerical evaluation; systematic analytic continuation formulas for general Lauricella FC函数s

What would settle it

If analytic continuation formulas for Lauricella FC functions beyond their defining convergence domain do not exist or cannot be constructed, the series representations derived here cannot be evaluated in all physical kinematic regimes, blocking the method's applicability to the full physical domain.

read the original abstract

In this work, we present the procedure to find series representations of tree-level cosmological correlators using the Kontorovich-Lebedev-Fourier (KLF) space formalism. This framework allows us to trade the in-in nested time integrals for frequency integrals over rational propagators and vertex functions, which encode interactions among quantum fields on a de Sitter background. Because these functions are the key objects to understand in order to perform a diagrammatic computation, we derive their relevant analytic properties by using both their integral representation and series representation in terms of Lauricella functions. For a vertex involving any number of fields, we obtain the location of singularities, the corresponding residues and the large-frequency asymptotic behaviour. Gathering these properties at each frequency integration allows us to compute a tree-level correlator directly, without relying on the differential equations it satisfies. To illustrate this procedure, we provide a complete treatment of the double-exchange diagram. The computation naturally distinguishes the different physical contributions, whether to the background or to the cosmological collider signal. The newly derived result is expressed at most in terms of a double series over hypergeometric functions, which simplifies the analytical expression of the correlator.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper develops the Kontorovich-Lebedev-Fourier (KLF) formalism for computing tree-level cosmological correlators on de Sitter space, focusing on the analytic properties of vertex functions that arise at interaction vertices. The authors derive the pole structure, residues, and large-frequency asymptotic behavior of these vertex functions using two complementary representations: an integral representation over modified Bessel functions and a series representation in terms of Lauricella FC functions (obtained via Mellin-Barnes techniques). As a concrete illustration, they perform a complete computation of the double-exchange diagram (two massive internal lines), carrying out the two-layer frequency integrals by contour integration. The final result is expressed as a double series over Gauss hypergeometric and Appell F4 functions, improving on previously known representations with up to four summation layers. The computation distinguishes background and cosmological collider signal contributions and covers all kinematic configurations.

Significance. The paper provides a systematic and self-contained derivation of the analytic properties of KLF vertex functions for arbitrary numbers of massive legs, which is a necessary step toward general diagrammatic computations in this formalism. The double-exchange computation is a non-trivial demonstration that the KLF approach can directly evaluate multi-layer frequency integrals without recourse to differential equation methods, and the resulting double-series representation is a genuine simplification over prior results. The derivation is internally consistent: vertex function properties are established from two independent representations, contour prescriptions are justified by asymptotic analysis, and key cancellations between residue contributions are verified. The identification of conditions under which the Appell F4 function terminates (enabling trivial analytic continuation) is a useful structural observation. The work is built on the KLF framework developed in the authors' prior works [36, 37], but the present results are derived independently from the integral and series representations using standard techniques.

major comments (3)
  1. After Eq. (3.47), the authors state that the contour prescriptions 'remain valid throughout the entire physical domain,' including the region |s1 - s2| < k34 < s1 + s2 where the Lauricella series representation (3.14) does not converge. The justification given is that the large-mu asymptotics are dominated by large-z behavior where K-Bessel decay ensures convergence regardless of kinematics. While this argument is physically reasonable, it is not rigorously proven: the asymptotic formula (2.29) is itself derived under condition (2.23), and the extension to the full physical domain is asserted rather than demonstrated. Since the contour prescriptions are load-bearing for every residue computation in the paper, a more careful justification—or at minimum a clear statement of what would need to be verified—would strengthen the presentation. The claim could be tested by checking that the one-
  2. There is no numerical verification of the extensive residue algebra anywhere in the paper. The double-exchange computation involves collecting residues from multiple sources (vertex functions, Legendre Q functions, sinh factors, iepsilon propagators) across two integration layers, four kinematic cases, and four Schwinger-Keldysh components, with numerous cancellations verified analytically (e.g., the vanishing of sums of sinh-pole contributions after connection formulas). While the analytic cancellations are checked symbolically, the sheer volume of algebraic steps makes a numerical spot-check highly desirable. For instance, evaluating the final series expressions (3.52), (3.56), (3.64), (3.67) at a specific kinematic point and comparing against a direct numerical evaluation of the original KLF integral (3.8) would provide an end-to-end validation. The absence of such a check is a gap in
  3. The claim that the result is valid in the 'whole physical domain up to analytic continuation' (end of Section 3.5) is not fully established for all components. As the authors themselves note, a non-terminating Appell F4 survives in the background-background component G^{B,B}_{+++} when kappa1 < 1, kappa2 < 1, kappa3 > 1 (Eq. D.12), and the one-fold Mellin-Barnes representation (B.11) is offered as a fallback for numerical evaluation in the analytically continued region. However, this MB representation is not exercised or verified anywhere in the paper. The practical viability of the proposed evaluation strategy in this regime remains untested. The authors should clarify whether the analytic continuation of the F4 function in (D.12) is known to exist and be computable, or whether this is an open problem. The statement in the conclusions that 'numerical evaluation can be done using the one
minor comments (6)
  1. The notation for vertex functions (e.g., I_{KI}, I_{II}, I_{KK}) is introduced in the text around Eq. (3.22) but is used before its formal definition in some places. A brief forward reference or earlier introduction would improve readability.
  2. In Eq. (3.28), kappa1 is defined as k56/(k34 + s1). It would help the reader to briefly note the physical meaning of the conditions kappa1 > 1 and kappa1 < 1 (e.g., which vertex momentum dominates) at the point of definition.
  3. The summary table at the end of Section 3.5 is compact but somewhat hard to parse. Restating the definitions of kappa1--kappa4 (3.78) alongside the table, or including a brief verbal description of each kinematic regime, would aid navigation.
  4. In Eq. (B.11), the one-fold MB representation for analytic continuation is introduced. The contour parameter c is stated to satisfy c > max(Re(i*mu1), 0) in the general formula (A.11), but the specific constraints on c in (B.11) are not restated. Adding these would make the representation more immediately usable.
  5. Reference [50] appears to be a 2025 preprint. If this is an unpublished work, the authors should verify its availability or provide an alternative published reference for the asymptotic formula (A.24).
  6. The paper would benefit from a brief discussion of the expected convergence rate of the final double series (3.52), at least in the simplest kinematic regime, to give the reader a sense of practical computability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. The three major comments are well-taken and we agree with all of them. We will (1) add a clear statement of the assumptions underlying the contour prescription extension to the full physical domain, including what would need to be verified for a rigorous proof; (2) include a numerical spot-check comparing the final series expressions against direct numerical evaluation of the original KLF integral; and (3) clarify the status of the non-terminating Appell F4 analytic continuation and exercise the one-fold Mellin-Barnes fallback representation numerically. All revisions will be incorporated in the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: After Eq. (3.47), the authors state that the contour prescriptions 'remain valid throughout the entire physical domain,' including the region |s1 - s2| < k34 < s1 + s2 where the Lauricella series representation (3.14) does not converge. The justification given is that the large-mu asymptotics are dominated by large-z behavior where K-Bessel decay ensures convergence regardless of kinematics. While this argument is physically reasonable, it is not rigorously proven: the asymptotic formula (2.29) is itself derived under condition (2.23), and the extension to the full physical domain is asserted rather than demonstrated. Since the contour prescriptions are load-bearing for every residue computation in the paper, a more careful justification—or at minimum a clear statement of what would need to be verified—would strengthen the presentation.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the extension of the contour prescriptions to the full physical domain is asserted rather than rigorously proven. We acknowledge this gap. The key point is that the large-frequency asymptotic behavior (2.29) is derived from the integral representation (2.17), where the large-z behavior of the Bessel functions ensures convergence under the kinematic condition (2.23). The physical argument for extending beyond this region is that the exponential decay of K-Bessel functions at large z is kinematics-independent, but we agree that a rigorous proof would require verifying that no subtleties arise from the interplay between the analytic continuation of the vertex function and the contour closure. In the revised manuscript, we will add a clear statement specifying that the contour prescriptions are rigorously justified under condition (2.23), and that their extension to the full physical domain is supported by the kinematics-independent nature of the large-z Bessel decay but is not formally proven. We will also explicitly state what would need to be verified—namely, that the analytic continuation of the vertex function does not introduce additional exponential growth that would alter the contour closure. This is an honest accounting of the status of this claim. revision: partial

  2. Referee: There is no numerical verification of the extensive residue algebra anywhere in the paper. The double-exchange computation involves collecting residues from multiple sources (vertex functions, Legendre Q functions, sinh factors, iepsilon propagators) across two integration layers, four kinematic cases, and four Schwinger-Keldysh components, with numerous cancellations verified analytically (e.g., the vanishing of sums of sinh-pole contributions after connection formulas). While the analytic cancellations are checked symbolically, the sheer volume of algebraic steps makes a numerical spot-check highly desirable. For instance, evaluating the final series expressions (3.52), (3.56), (3.64), (3.67) at a specific kinematic point and comparing against a direct numerical evaluation of the original KLF integral (3.8) would provide an end-to-end validation. The absence of such a check is a gap in

    Authors: We fully agree that a numerical spot-check would significantly strengthen the paper, given the volume of residue algebra and the numerous analytic cancellations. We will add such a check in the revised manuscript: we will evaluate the final series expressions (3.52), (3.56), (3.64), and (3.67) at a specific kinematic point in the regime kappa1 < 1, kappa3 > 1, and compare against a direct numerical evaluation of the original KLF integral (3.8). This will provide an end-to-end validation of the residue computations, including the key cancellations between sinh-pole contributions. We will include the comparison as a figure or table in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The claim that the result is valid in the 'whole physical domain up to analytic continuation' (end of Section 3.5) is not fully established for all components. As the authors themselves note, a non-terminating Appell F4 survives in the background-background component G^{B,B}_{+++} when kappa1 < 1, kappa2 < 1, kappa3 > 1 (Eq. D.12), and the one-fold Mellin-Barnes representation (B.11) is offered as a fallback for numerical evaluation in the analytically continued region. However, this MB representation is not exercised or verified anywhere in the paper. The practical viability of the proposed evaluation strategy in this regime remains untested. The authors should clarify whether the analytic continuation of the F4 function in (D.12) is known to exist and be computable, or whether this is an open problem. The statement in the conclusions that 'numerical evaluation can be done using the one

    Authors: The referee raises a valid point. The analytic continuation of the Appell F4 function is known to exist in principle—it is a multivariable hypergeometric function satisfying a system of partial differential equations, and its analytic continuation is guaranteed by the general theory of such functions. However, explicit convergent series representations for F4 outside its defining convergence domain are not readily available in the literature in the same way they are for the Gauss 2F1 function. This is indeed an open problem for practical evaluation, and we should have been more precise about this. The one-fold Mellin-Barnes representation (B.11) is offered as a concrete fallback: it converges for any kinematic configuration because its contour decay is exponential and kinematics-independent, as we explain in Appendix B. However, we agree that presenting this representation without exercising it numerically leaves its practical viability untested. In the revised manuscript, we will (1) clarify that the analytic continuation of F4 exists in principle but lacks simple convergent series representations, making it an open problem for efficient evaluation; (2) include a numerical evaluation of the MB representation (B.11) at a kinematic point in the analytically continued region to demonstrate its practical viability; and (3) temper the statement in the conclusions accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity found. The paper's central results are derived independently from the KLF framework's defining integral representation and standard complex analysis.

full rationale

The paper builds on the KLF formalism from self-cited works [36, 37] (overlapping authors), but this citation provides the framework — harmonic functions, KLF transform, propagators, and the definition of vertex functions via the integral (2.17) — rather than the results being claimed. The new contributions of this paper are: (1) the general series representation of vertex functions (2.21) derived via Mellin-Barnes transforms in Appendix B, starting from the integral definition (2.17); (2) the analytic properties (pole locations (2.26), residues (2.28), large-frequency asymptotics (2.29)) derived from that series representation and the integral representation; (3) the complete double-exchange computation via contour integration and residue collection. Each of these is a self-contained derivation: the Mellin-Barnes representation (B.5) follows from writing Bessel functions in their MB form and performing the z-integral, the pole structure follows from standard Γ-function properties, and the asymptotic behavior (C.25)-(C.29) follows from the large-z behavior of Bessel functions and the Legendre Q integral representation. The double-exchange result (3.52) is obtained by applying the residue theorem to the frequency integrals, using the independently-derived vertex function properties. No step reduces to its own inputs by construction. The self-citations [36, 37] establish the KLF diagrammatic rules, which are a reformulation of standard in-in QFT using de Sitter symmetry generators — not an ansatz that could create circularity. The one point of mild concern is the claim (after Eq. 3.47) that contour prescriptions 'remain valid throughout the entire physical domain,' which relies on the large-µ asymptotics being dominated by large-z Bessel decay independent of kinematics; this is plausible but not rigorously proven. However, this is a correctness/completeness concern, not a circularity. Score 1 reflects the presence of self-citation for the framework, which is not load-bearing for the novel results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, particles, or forces. The vertex functions and KLF formalism are defined in prior work [36, 37]. The Lauricella and Appell functions are standard special functions. No free parameters are fitted to data; the computation is purely analytical with all quantities determined by kinematic variables and masses.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption External legs carry conformally coupled scalar fields (μ_c.c. = i/2), simplifying vertex functions via K_{1/2} identities.
    Stated in §2.1 and §3: 'here we will focus on the case where all external legs carry conformally coupled scalar fields.' This restricts the scope of the computation.
  • domain assumption The spatial dimension d is not an even integer during computation, reachable by analytic continuation.
    Stated at the beginning of §3: 'we consider that the spatial dimension d is not an even integer, that case being reachable by analytic continuation at the end of the calculation.'
  • domain assumption The kinematic condition (2.23), sum of N-1 momenta < Nth momentum, is satisfied during computation, with analytic continuation performed afterwards.
    Stated in §2.2: 'in the rest of this work, we will suppose (2.23) to be satisfied when integrating over frequencies.' This is the convergence condition for the Lauricella series representation.
  • domain assumption Interactions are polynomial (L ⊃ λ ∏ σ_i^{α_i}) with principal series fields.
    Stated in §2.1, equation (2.15). Restricts to scalar fields with arbitrary mass in the principal series.
  • standard math The Bunch-Davies vacuum is the correct initial state for perturbations.
    Used implicitly in the KLF construction via harmonic functions (2.5) and the path integral formulation (2.9)-(2.10). Standard in inflationary cosmology.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 72586 in / 2515 out tokens · 121719 ms · 2026-07-07T17:02:54.134040+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · 44 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Inflation: Theory and Observations

    A. Ach´ ucarro et al.,Inflation: Theory and Observations,2203.08128

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel,The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities,JHEP04 (2020) 105 [1811.00024]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    The Cosmological Bootstrap: Weight-Shifting Operators and Scalar Seeds

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel,The cosmological bootstrap: weight-shifting operators and scalar seeds,JHEP12(2020) 204 [1910.14051]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    The Cosmological Bootstrap: Spinning Correlators from Symmetries and Factorization

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel,The Cosmological Bootstrap: Spinning Correlators from Symmetries and Factorization,SciPost Phys.11 (2021) 071 [2005.04234]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Building a Boostless Bootstrap for the Bispectrum

    E. Pajer,Building a Boostless Bootstrap for the Bispectrum,JCAP01(2021) 023 [2010.12818]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Boostless Cosmological Collider Bootstrap

    G.L. Pimentel and D.-G. Wang,Boostless cosmological collider bootstrap,JHEP10 (2022) 177 [2205.00013]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Cosmological Bootstrap in Slow Motion

    S. Jazayeri and S. Renaux-Petel,Cosmological bootstrap in slow motion,JHEP12 (2022) 137 [2205.10340]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Bootstrapping Multi-Field Inflation: non-Gaussianities from light scalars revisited

    D.-G. Wang, G.L. Pimentel and A. Ach´ ucarro,Bootstrapping multi-field inflation: non-Gaussianities from light scalars revisited,JCAP05(2023) 043 [2212.14035]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Helical Inflation Correlators: Partial Mellin-Barnes and Bootstrap Equations

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Helical inflation correlators: partial Mellin-Barnes and bootstrap equations,JHEP04(2023) 059 [2208.13790]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Closed-Form Formulae for Inflation Correlators

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Closed-form formulae for inflation correlators,JHEP07 (2023) 001 [2301.07047]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Inflation Correlators with Multiple Massive Exchanges

    Z.-Z. Xianyu and J. Zang,Inflation correlators with multiple massive exchanges, JHEP03(2024) 070 [2309.10849]. – 85 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Massive Inflationary Amplitudes: Differential Equations and Complete Solutions for General Trees

    H. Liu and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Massive inflationary amplitudes: differential equations and complete solutions for general trees,JHEP09(2025) 183 [2412.07843]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Anatomy of Family Trees in Cosmological Correlators

    B. Fan and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Anatomy of family trees in cosmological correlators,JHEP 12(2025) 179 [2509.02684]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Xianyu and J

    Z.-Z. Xianyu and J. Zang,Massive inflationary amplitudes: new representations and degenerate limits,JHEP03(2026) 122 [2511.08677]

    work page arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Differential Equations for Cosmological Correlators

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, A. Hillman, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel, Differential equations for cosmological correlators,JHEP09(2025) 009 [ 2312.05303]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Kinematic Flow and the Emergence of Time

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, A. Hillman, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel, Kinematic Flow and the Emergence of Time,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 031602 [2312.05300]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Cosmology meets cohomology

    S. De and A. Pokraka,Cosmology meets cohomology,JHEP03(2024) 156 [2308.03753]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Hang and C

    Y. Hang and C. Shen,A note on kinematic flow and differential equations for two-site one-loop graph in FRW spacetime,JHEP09(2025) 209 [2410.17192]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Kinematic Flow for Cosmological Loop Integrands

    D. Baumann, H. Goodhew and H. Lee,Kinematic flow for cosmological loop integrands,JHEP07(2025) 131 [2410.17994]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Kinematic Flow for Banana Loops and Unparticles

    T. Westerdijk and C. Yang,Kinematic Flow for Banana Loops and Unparticles, 2604.22918

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    An Alternative Viewpoint on Kinematic Flow from Tubing Splitting

    J.-Y. Ke and P. He,An Alternative Viewpoint on Kinematic Flow from Tubing Splitting,2605.17751

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Differential Equations for Massive Correlators

    D. Baumann, A. Joyce, H. Lee and K. Salehi Vaziri,Differential Equations for Massive Correlators,2604.08658

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation

    J.M. Maldacena and G.L. Pimentel,On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation, JHEP09(2011) 045 [1104.2846]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Correlators

    S. Raju,New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Correlators, Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 126009 [1201.6449]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    The Cosmological Optical Theorem

    H. Goodhew, S. Jazayeri and E. Pajer,The Cosmological Optical Theorem,JCAP04 (2021) 021 [2009.02898]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Cosmological Cutting Rules

    S. Melville and E. Pajer,Cosmological Cutting Rules,JHEP05(2021) 249 [2103.09832]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Cutting Cosmological Correlators

    H. Goodhew, S. Jazayeri, M.H.G. Lee and E. Pajer,Cutting cosmological correlators, JCAP08(2021) 003 [2104.06587]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    From Locality and Unitarity to Cosmological Correlators

    S. Jazayeri, E. Pajer and D. Stefanyszyn,From locality and unitarity to cosmological correlators,JHEP10(2021) 065 [2103.08649]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna,Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space, JHEP02(2020) 098 [1907.01143]. – 86 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators

    C. Sleight,A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators,JHEP01(2020) 090 [1906.12302]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    From AdS to dS Exchanges: Spectral Representation, Mellin Amplitudes and Crossing

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna,From AdS to dS exchanges: Spectral representation, Mellin amplitudes, and crossing,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) L081902 [2007.09993]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    From dS to AdS and back

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna,From dS to AdS and back,JHEP12(2021) 074 [2109.02725]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Inflation Correlators at the One-Loop Order: Nonanalyticity, Factorization, Cutting Rule, and OPE

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Inflation correlators at the one-loop order: nonanalyticity, factorization, cutting rule, and OPE,JHEP09(2023) 116 [2304.13295]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Laplace Space for Cosmological Correlators

    N. Belrhali, A. Poisson and S. Renaux-Petel,Laplace Space for Cosmological Correlators,2606.27309

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Massive Cosmological Correlators from Flat Space: a Laplace-Space Approach

    N. Belrhali, A. Poisson and S. Renaux-Petel,Massive Cosmological Correlators from Flat Space: a Laplace-Space Approach,2606.27311

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    De Sitter Momentum Space

    N. Belrhali, A. Poisson, S. Renaux-Petel and D. Werth,De Sitter Momentum Space, 2601.15228

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Kontorovich-Lebedev-Fourier Space for de Sitter Correlators

    N. Belrhali, A. Poisson, S. Renaux-Petel and D. Werth,Kontorovich-Lebedev-Fourier Space for de Sitter Correlators,2604.15251

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Spectral Representation of Cosmological Correlators

    D. Werth,Spectral representation of cosmological correlators,JHEP12(2024) 017 [2409.02072]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    S. Aoki, L. Pinol, F. Sano, M. Yamaguchi and Y. Zhu,Cosmological correlators with double massive exchanges: bootstrap equation and phenomenology,JHEP09(2024) 176 [2404.09547]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Quantum Contributions to Cosmological Correlations

    S. Weinberg,Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 043514 [hep-th/0506236]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  41. [41]

    X. Chen, Y. Wang and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Schwinger-Keldysh Diagrammatics for Primordial Perturbations,JCAP12(2017) 006 [1703.10166]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Towards the non-perturbative cosmological bootstrap

    M. Hogervorst, J. Penedones and K.S. Vaziri,Towards the non-perturbative cosmological bootstrap,JHEP02(2023) 162 [2107.13871]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    A de Sitter S-matrix from amputated cosmological correlators

    S. Melville and G.L. Pimentel,A de Sitter S-matrix from amputated cosmological correlators,JHEP08(2024) 211 [2404.05712]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Holography for inflation using conformal perturbation theory

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Holography for inflation using conformal perturbation theory,JHEP04(2013) 047 [1211.4550]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  45. [45]

    Implications of conformal invariance in momentum space

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Implications of conformal invariance in momentum space,JHEP03(2014) 111 [1304.7760]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  46. [46]

    Evaluation of conformal integrals

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Evaluation of conformal integrals,JHEP 02(2016) 068 [1511.02357]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  47. [47]

    Lauricella,Sulle funzioni ipergeometriche a piu variabili,Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo7(1893) 111

    G. Lauricella,Sulle funzioni ipergeometriche a piu variabili,Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo7(1893) 111. – 87 –

    work page

  48. [48]

    Matsumoto,Appell and lauricella hypergeometric functions, inEncyclopedia of Special Functions: The Askey-Bateman Project, T.H

    K. Matsumoto,Appell and lauricella hypergeometric functions, inEncyclopedia of Special Functions: The Askey-Bateman Project, T.H. Koornwinder and J.V. Stokman, eds., p. 79?100, Cambridge University Press (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

    “NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions.”https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.6 of 2026-03-15

    work page 2026

  50. [50]

    Dunster,Simplified uniform asymptotic expansions for associated legendre and conical functions, 2025

    T.M. Dunster,Simplified uniform asymptotic expansions for associated legendre and conical functions, 2025. – 88 –

    work page 2025