pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.01503 · v2 · pith:7JAEDP6Snew · submitted 2025-10-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.soft

Morphological evolution of a semiconductor surface driven by irradiation-induced anisotropic plastic flow

Tyler P. Evans , Scott A. Norris This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.soft
keywords ion irradiationnanopatterningKuramoto-Sivashinsky equationplastic flowamorphous layersiliconsemiconductor morphologyion-hammering
0
0 comments X

The pith

A generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation derived from irradiation-induced anisotropic plastic flow in an amorphous layer accounts for observed nanopatterns on irradiated silicon.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops asymptotic approximations that couple the local ion flux to the evolving free interface of the thin amorphous layer created by sustained irradiation. From the hypothesis of anisotropic plastic flow, known as ion-hammering, these approximations produce a generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky-type equation governing surface morphology. A sympathetic reader would care because the model incorporates both the short-time effects of collision cascades and the longer-time viscous flow enabled by defects, offering a unified description that matches several quantitative and qualitative features of experiments.

Core claim

The central claim is that the morphological evolution of a semiconductor surface under ion irradiation follows a generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky-type equation obtained by combining the physical hypothesis of irradiation-induced anisotropic plastic flow inside the thin amorphous layer with several asymptotic approximations that link the local ion flux to the layer's free interface. With physically plausible parameters, this equation produces good quantitative and qualitative agreement with experimental observations of nano-pattern formation on silicon under argon, krypton, and xenon irradiation at projectile energies from 500 eV to 2 keV.

What carries the argument

The generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky-type equation for the evolving free surface, obtained by coupling the local ion flux to the amorphous layer's free interface through asymptotic approximations under the ion-hammering hypothesis.

If this is right

  • The model reproduces several quantitative and qualitative aspects of nanopattern formation on silicon irradiated by argon, krypton, and xenon at 500 eV to 2 keV.
  • Both short-time sputtering from collision cascades and longer-time viscous flow from defects must be included to explain the patterns.
  • Disagreements between the model predictions and specific experimental features point to needed refinements in the coupling approximations.
  • The same framework can be used to explore how changes in ion flux alter the resulting surface morphology.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the equation holds, similar pattern formation should appear in other amorphous materials under comparable irradiation conditions.
  • The approach may connect to pattern-formation studies in other driven thin-film systems where anisotropic flow couples to external fluxes.
  • Varying the projectile energy outside the 500 eV–2 keV window would provide a clear test of the asymptotic approximations.

Load-bearing premise

Sustained irradiation produces anisotropic plastic flow inside the thin amorphous layer that can be coupled to the local ion flux through asymptotic approximations.

What would settle it

Direct experimental measurement showing that the observed pattern wavelengths or orientations on silicon fail to follow the dependence on ion type, energy, or flux predicted by the derived equation for the range 500 eV to 2 keV.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.01503 by Scott A. Norris, Tyler P. Evans.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example of level sets of localized dose (or fluence) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Examples of computed h0(θ), x0(θ; k) and r0(θ; k) based on Equations (28) for 1000keV Ar+-irradiated Si. Left: comparison of theoretical angle-dependent film thickness with film thick￾ness inferred from experiments [53]. Center: the lateral shift separating free and amorphous￾crystalline interfaces plotted for three wavenumbers. Right: the flattening factor plotted for three wavenumbers. 2.2 Free surface o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: Comparison of wavelength λ(θ) predictions from [51] (dash-dotted red curve), experimental data [41], and how they are changed by incorporating the present work. The solid blue curve uses the full-spectrum (arbitrary k) results (28) for the description of the interfaces, while the dashed green curve uses the long-wave (k ≈ 0) results (31. Center, right: Value of the dimensionless coefficient appearing… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: simulated time series showing the evolution of surface roughness for three systems where fAD = 3 × 10−3 1 s , γ = 1.36 J m2 , η = 100 GPa · s and θ = 65◦ . The only differences are in the assignment of a, α, β. Center, right: cross-section of the irradiated surfaces at the same time. For 500eV Ar+-irradiated Si, surface roughness has already saturated around 1.9 nm, while the 500eV Xe+-irradiated Ge … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

While numerous models exist which explain certain aspects of irradiation-induced nanopatterning on semiconductors, a comprehensive theoretical explanation has remained elusive. However, it is increasingly apparent that such a model will require understanding the dual influence of the collision cascade initiated by ion implantation: first, as a source of material transport by sputtering and atomic displacements occurring over short time scales, and, second, as a source of defects permitting viscous flow within the thin, amorphous layer that results from sustained irradiation over longer time scales. To better understand the latter, we develop several asymptotic approximations for coupling the local ion flux experienced by the amorphous layer to the layer's evolving free interface. From these and the physical hypothesis of irradiation-induced anisotropic plastic flow, or ``ion-hammering", we derive a generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky-type equation for the evolving free surface. With physically plausible parameters, the present model achieves good quantitative and qualitative agreement with several aspects of experimental observations of nano-pattern formation during irradiation of silicon by argon, krypton and xenon, and with projectile energies from 500eV to 2keV. Disagreements between model and experiment are discussed, as are implications for future directions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops asymptotic approximations to couple the local ion flux to the evolving free interface of the thin amorphous layer formed under sustained ion irradiation of semiconductors. Building on the ion-hammering hypothesis of anisotropic plastic flow, it derives a generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky-type equation for surface morphological evolution. The model is reported to achieve good quantitative and qualitative agreement with experimental nanopattern formation on silicon under Ar, Kr, and Xe irradiation at 500 eV to 2 keV when using physically plausible parameters for viscous flow and sputtering.

Significance. If the asymptotic approximations remain valid in the finite-amplitude regime and the parameters can be independently constrained, the work would offer a unified description incorporating both short-time collision-cascade sputtering and longer-time viscous flow, potentially explaining pattern formation across multiple ion species and energies. The derivation of an effective continuum equation from the physical hypothesis is a methodological strength that could be falsifiable with additional constraints.

major comments (3)
  1. [Derivation of the generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation] The central quantitative agreement claim rests on asymptotic approximations that close the model from the ion-hammering hypothesis to a generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, yet no explicit error bounds, regime-of-validity analysis, or comparison against the finite-amplitude (~10-100 nm wavelength) ripples in the cited experiments are provided. If higher-order interface terms become comparable, the retained equation changes and the reported agreement would not follow.
  2. [Parameter selection and experimental comparison] The abstract states that agreement is obtained 'with physically plausible parameters' for the viscous flow and sputtering coefficients, but provides no discussion of how these are selected versus independently predicted or constrained. Without such constraints or sensitivity analysis, the multi-ion, multi-energy agreement risks reducing to post-hoc fitting rather than a parameter-free or falsifiable prediction.
  3. [Asymptotic coupling approximations] The model is constructed by coupling local ion flux to the amorphous-layer interface via the stated asymptotic approximations; however, the manuscript does not examine whether these small-slope or long-wavelength limits remain accurate once the observed nonlinear nanopattern amplitudes develop, which is load-bearing for the claim that the derived equation explains the experiments.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would be strengthened by stating the explicit form of the derived generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation and the precise experimental observables (e.g., ripple wavelength, amplitude, or orientation) against which quantitative agreement is claimed.
  2. A brief table or figure summarizing the fitted versus measured quantities for each ion/energy combination would improve clarity of the agreement assessment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript while maintaining the integrity of the presented analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of the generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation] The central quantitative agreement claim rests on asymptotic approximations that close the model from the ion-hammering hypothesis to a generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, yet no explicit error bounds, regime-of-validity analysis, or comparison against the finite-amplitude (~10-100 nm wavelength) ripples in the cited experiments are provided. If higher-order interface terms become comparable, the retained equation changes and the reported agreement would not follow.

    Authors: We agree that explicit error bounds and a dedicated regime-of-validity analysis are not included in the current manuscript. The derivation relies on standard asymptotic expansions for thin-layer viscous flow coupled to ion flux, with the small-slope and long-wavelength assumptions motivated by the separation between amorphous layer thickness and observed ripple wavelengths. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection providing order-of-magnitude estimates of the neglected higher-order terms evaluated at the experimental amplitudes (approximately 10-20 nm height over 50-100 nm wavelength), thereby clarifying the conditions under which the generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation remains a controlled approximation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Parameter selection and experimental comparison] The abstract states that agreement is obtained 'with physically plausible parameters' for the viscous flow and sputtering coefficients, but provides no discussion of how these are selected versus independently predicted or constrained. Without such constraints or sensitivity analysis, the multi-ion, multi-energy agreement risks reducing to post-hoc fitting rather than a parameter-free or falsifiable prediction.

    Authors: The viscous-flow coefficients are drawn from literature values for irradiation-induced viscosity in amorphous silicon, while sputtering yields are estimated via SRIM-type simulations for the relevant ion energies. We concur that the manuscript would be improved by explicit discussion of these choices and by a sensitivity analysis. The revised version will expand the parameter section to cite the specific literature sources, justify the ranges adopted, and include a brief sensitivity study showing that the predicted ripple wavelengths and growth rates remain qualitatively robust within the physically plausible interval. We note, however, that fully independent experimental constraints for every ion species and energy combination are not presently available in the literature. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Asymptotic coupling approximations] The model is constructed by coupling local ion flux to the amorphous-layer interface via the stated asymptotic approximations; however, the manuscript does not examine whether these small-slope or long-wavelength limits remain accurate once the observed nonlinear nanopattern amplitudes develop, which is load-bearing for the claim that the derived equation explains the experiments.

    Authors: The experimental surface slopes are moderate (order 0.2-0.4), a regime in which the small-slope expansion is routinely retained in related thin-film models. Nevertheless, we acknowledge the absence of an explicit check against the finite-amplitude regime. In the revision we will add a short assessment that estimates the size of the neglected nonlinear interface corrections at the observed amplitudes and, where feasible, compares the continuum prediction with direct numerical integration of the underlying thin-layer equations. This will provide quantitative support for the applicability of the derived equation to the reported experiments. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Fully independent experimental constraints on the viscous flow coefficients for each ion species and energy combination studied are not available in the existing literature, limiting the degree to which the model can be rendered strictly parameter-free.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives the generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation from the stated physical hypothesis of irradiation-induced anisotropic plastic flow combined with asymptotic approximations for ion flux coupling to the interface. This step is presented as a derivation rather than a tautology or renaming. Agreement with Si/Ar/Kr/Xe experiments is reported using physically plausible parameters, but the abstract provides no indication that parameters are fitted to the target observations in a way that forces the result by construction. No self-citations, self-definitional steps, or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work are quoted. The model remains independent of the specific experimental data in its core derivation, qualifying as self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on one domain assumption (anisotropic plastic flow) and a set of asymptotic approximations whose validity is not independently verified in the provided abstract. No new particles or forces are postulated; the free parameters are the coefficients that are adjusted to match experiment.

free parameters (1)
  • viscous flow and sputtering coefficients
    Coefficients in the derived PDE that are described as physically plausible and chosen to achieve quantitative agreement with observed pattern wavelengths and amplitudes.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Irradiation produces anisotropic plastic flow (ion-hammering) inside the amorphous surface layer.
    Invoked as the physical mechanism that converts defect creation into directed viscous relaxation; this assumption is required to close the model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1368 out tokens · 39605 ms · 2026-05-21T20:39:28.480239+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Vladimir S. Ajaev. Interfacial Fluid Mechanics: A Mathematical Modeling Appro ach. Springer, 2012

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Belyakov and A.I

    V.S. Belyakov and A.I. Titov. Stationary amorphous laye r formation during 5kev ar+ bom- bardment of ge. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids: Incorporating Plasm a Science and Plasma Technology, 138:231–241, 1996

    work page 1996

  3. [3]

    R. M. Bradley and J. M.E. Harper. Theory of ripple topogra phy induced by ion bombardment. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. , 6:2390–2395, 1988

    work page 1988

  4. [4]

    Mark Bradley

    R. Mark Bradley. Exact linear dispersion relation for th e sigmund model of ion sputtering. Physical Review B , 84:075413, 2011. 23

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    G. Carter. The effects of surface ripples on sputtering ero sion rates and secondary ion emission yields. Journal of Applied Physics , 85:455–459, 1999. H

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    Carter, M.J

    G. Carter, M.J. Nobes, F. Paton, J.S. Williams, and J.L. W hitton. Ion bombardment induced ripple topography on amorphous solids. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids: Incorporating Plasma Science and Plasma Technology , 1977

    work page 1977

  7. [7]

    Carter and V

    G. Carter and V. Vishnyakov. Roughening and ripple insta bilities on ion-bombarded Si. Phys. Rev. B , 54:17647–17653, 1996

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    Castro, R

    M. Castro, R. Gago, L. V´ azquez, J. Mu˜ noz-Garc ´ ıa, and R. Cuerno. Stress-induced solid flow drives surface nanopatterning of silicon by ion-beam irrad iation. Physical Review B, 86:214107, 2012

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    Hydrodynamic approach to surface pattern formation by ion beams

    Mario Castro and Rodolfo Cuerno. Hydrodynamic approach to surface pattern formation by ion beams. Applied Surface Science , 258:4171–4178, 2012

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    W. L. Chan and E. Chason. Making waves: Kinetic processe s controlling surface evolution during low energy ion sputtering. J. Appl. Phys. , 101:121301, 2007

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    Stress evolution and defec t diffusion in Cu during low energy ion irradiation: Experiments and modeling

    Wai Lun Chan and Eric Chason. Stress evolution and defec t diffusion in Cu during low energy ion irradiation: Experiments and modeling. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A , 26:44, 2008

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Instability

    Subramanian Chandrasekhar. Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Instability . Courier Corpo- ration, 2013

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    T. K. Chini, F. Okuyama, M. Tanemura, and K. Nordlund. St ructural investigation of keV Ar- ion-induced surface ripples in Si by cross-sectional trans mission electron microscopy. Physical Review B , 67(205403), 2003

    work page 2003

  14. [14]

    R. V. Craster and O. K. Matar. Dynamics and stability of t hin liquid films. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 81:1131–1198, Aug 2009

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Cross and H

    M. Cross and H. Greenside. Pattern Formation and Dynamics in Nonequilibrium Systems . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg. Pattern formation outsi de of equilibrium. Reviews of Modern Physics , 65:851–1123, 1993

    work page 1993

  17. [17]

    Cuerno and A.-L

    R. Cuerno and A.-L. Barab´ asi. Dynamic scaling of ion-s puttered surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 74:4746–4749, 1995

    work page 1995

  18. [18]

    Cuerno, M

    R. Cuerno, M. Castro, J. Mu˜ noz-Garc ´ ıa, R. Gago, and L.V´ asquez. Nanoscale pattern forma- tion at surfaces under ion-beam sputtering: A perspective f rom continuum models. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B , 269:894–900, 2011

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Cuerno and J.-S

    R. Cuerno and J.-S. Kim. A perspective on nanoscale patt ern formation at surfaces by ion- beam irradiation. Journal of Applied Physics , 128(18):180902, 2020

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    C.A. Davis. A simple model for the formation of compress ive stress in thin films by ion bombardment. Thin Solid Films , 226, 1993

    work page 1993

  21. [21]

    Drazin and W.H

    P.G. Drazin and W.H. Reid. Introduction to Hydrodynamic Stability . Cambridge University Press, 1985. 24

    work page 1985

  22. [22]

    Swelling as a stabilizing mechanism in irradiated thin films ii: Effect of swelling rate

    Tyler Evans and Scott Norris. Swelling as a stabilizing mechanism in irradiated thin films ii: Effect of swelling rate. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 34:325302, 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Tyler P. Evans. Viscous thin-film models of nanoscale self-organization un der ion bombardment. PhD thesis, Southern Methodist University, 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Evans and Scott A

    Tyler P. Evans and Scott A. Norris. Swelling as a stabili zing mechanism in irradiated thin films: Iii. effect on critical angle in a composite model. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 35:325302, 2023

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Evans and Scott A

    Tyler P. Evans and Scott A. Norris. Interfacial phase-c hange and geometry modify nanoscale pattern formation in irradiated thin films. Journal of Engineering Mathematics , 146(1):1, Apr 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    M. P. Gelfand and R. M. Bradley. One dimensional conserv ative surface dynamics with broken parity: Arrested collapse versus coarsening. Physics Letters A , 379(3):199–205, 2015

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    H. B. George, Y. Tang, X. Chen, J. Li, J. W. Hutchinson, J. A. Golovchenko, and M. J. Aziz. Nanopore fabrication in amorphous Si: Viscous flow model and comparison to experiment. Journal of Applied Physics , 108:014310, 2010

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Harrison and R

    Matt P. Harrison and R. Mark Bradley. Crater function ap proach to ion-induced nanoscale pattern formation: Craters for flat surfaces are insufficient . Physical Review B , 89:245401, 2014

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Hofs¨ ass, O

    H. Hofs¨ ass, O. Bobes, and K. Zhang. Argon ion beam induc ed surface pattern formation on Si. Journal of Applied Physics , 119:035302, 2016

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Aziz, and Michael P

    Miranda Holmes-Cerfon, Michael J. Aziz, and Michael P. Brenner. Creating sharp features by colliding shocks on uniformly irradiated surfaces. Physical Review B , 85:165441, 2012

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    Bertozzi, M ichael P

    Miranda Holmes-Cerfon, Wei Zhou, Andrea L. Bertozzi, M ichael P. Brenner, and Michael J. Aziz. Development of knife-edge ridges on ion bombarded sur faces. Applied Physics letters , 101:143109, 2012

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    M. Z. Hossain, J. B. Freund, and H. T. Johnson. Ion impact energy distribution and sputtering of Si and Ge. Journal of Applied Physics , 2012

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Ishii, C

    Y. Ishii, C. Madi, M. J. Aziz, and E. Chason. Stress evolu tion in Si during low-energy ion bombardment. Journal of Materials Research , 29:2942–2948, 2014

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    R. J. Jaccodine. Surface energy of germanium and silico n. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 110(6):524, jun 1963

    work page 1963

  35. [35]

    Kalyanasundaram, M

    N. Kalyanasundaram, M. C. Moore, J. B. Freund, and H. T. J ohnson. Stress evolution due to medium-energy ion bombardment of silicon. Acta Materialia, 54:483–491, 2006

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    G. H. Kinchin and R. S. Pease. The displacement of atoms i n solids by radiation. Reports on Progress in Physics , 18(1):1, jan 1955

    work page 1955

  37. [37]

    Ion beam-generated surface ripples: new in sight in the underlying mechanism

    Tanuj Kumar, Ashish Kumar, Dinesh Chander Agarwal, Nir najan Prasad Lalla, and Di- nakar Kanjilal. Ion beam-generated surface ripples: new in sight in the underlying mechanism. Nanoscale Research Letters, 8, 2013. 25

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    B. Liedke. Ion beam processing of surfaces and interfaces: Modeling and atomistic simulations. PhD thesis, Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, 2011

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Lopez-Cazalilla, D

    A. Lopez-Cazalilla, D. Chowdhury, A. Ilinov, S. Mondal , P. Barman, S.R. Bhattacharyya, D. Ghose, F. Djurabekova, K. Nordlund, and S. Norris. Patter n formation on ion-irradiated si surface at energies where sputtering is negligible. Journal of Applied Physics , 2018

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    C. S. Madi. Linear Stability and Instability Patterns in Ion Bombarded Sil icon Surfaces. PhD thesis, Harvard University, 2011

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    C. S. Madi, B. P. Davidovitch, H. B. George, S. A. Norris, M. P. Brenner, and M. J. Aziz. Multiple bifurcation types and the linear dynamics of ion sp uttered surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 101:246102, 2008

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    C. S. Madi, H. B. George, and M. J. Aziz. Linear stability and instability patterns in ion- sputtered silicon. J. Phys. Cond. Matt. , 21:224010, 2009

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Madi and Michael J

    Charbel S. Madi and Michael J. Aziz. Multiple scatterin g causes the low energy-low angle constant wavelength bifurcation of argon ion bombarded sil icon surfaces. Applied Surface Science, 258:4112–4115, 2012. (IINM2011 Bhubaneswar Conference P roceedings)

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    Moreno-Barrado, M

    A. Moreno-Barrado, M. Castro, R. Gago, L. V˜ azquez, J. M u˜ noz-Garc ´ ıa, R. Redondo-Cubero, B. Galiana, C. Ballesteros, and R. Cuerno. Nonuniversality due to inhomogeneous stress in semiconductor surface nanopatterning by low-energy ion-b eam irradiation. Physical Review B, 91:155303, 2015

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Mu˜ noz-Garc ´ ıa, R

    J. Mu˜ noz-Garc ´ ıa, R. Cuerno, and Mario Castro. Stress -driven nonlinear dynamics of ion- induced surface nanopatterns. Phys. Rev. B , 100:205421, Nov 2019

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Mu˜ noz-Garc ´ ıa, L

    J. Mu˜ noz-Garc ´ ıa, L. V´ azquez, M. Castro, R. Gago, A. Redondo-Cubero, A. Moreno-Barrado, and R. Cuerno. Self-organized nanopatterning of silicon su rfaces by ion beam sputtering. Materials Science and Engineering R , 86:1–44, 2014

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Ludwig, Lutz Wiegart, Yugang Zhang, Andrei Fluerasu, Xiaozhi Zhang, and Randall L

    Peco Myint, Karl F. Ludwig, Lutz Wiegart, Yugang Zhang, Andrei Fluerasu, Xiaozhi Zhang, and Randall L. Headrick. Nanoscale dynamics during self-or ganized ion beam patterning of si. i. ar + bombardment. Phys. Rev. B , 103:195423, May 2021

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Ludwig, Lutz Wiegart, Yugang Zhang, Andrei Fluerasu, Xiaozhi Zhang, and Randall L

    Peco Myint, Karl F. Ludwig, Lutz Wiegart, Yugang Zhang, Andrei Fluerasu, Xiaozhi Zhang, and Randall L. Headrick. Nanoscale dynamics during self-or ganized ion beam patterning of si. ii. kr + bombardment. Phys. Rev. B , 103:195424, May 2021

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Navez, D

    M. Navez, D. Chaperot, and C. Sella. Microscopie electr onique - etude de lattaque du verre par bombardement ionique. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires Des Seances de l’Academie des Sciences, 254:240, 1962

    work page 1962

  50. [50]

    S. A. Norris. Stability analysis of a viscoelastic mode l for ion-irradiated silicon. Physical Review B , 85:155325, 2012

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    S. A. Norris. Stress-induced patterns in ion-irradiat ed silicon: model based on anisotropic plastic flow. Phys. Rev. B , 86:235405, 2012

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    S. A. Norris, M. P. Brenner, and M. J. Aziz. From crater fu nctions to partial differential equations: A new approach to ion bombardment induced nonequ ilibrium pattern formation. J. Phys. Cond. Matt. , 21:224017, 2009. 26

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    S. A. Norris, J. C. Perkinson, M. Mokhtarzadeh, E. Anzen berg, M. J. Aziz, and K. F. Lud- wig Jr. Distinguishing physical mechanisms using GISAXS ex periments and linear theory: the importance of high wavenumbers. Scientific Reports, 7, 2017

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    S. A. Norris, J. Samela, L. Bukonte, M. Backman, D. F. K. N ordlund, C.S. Madi, M.P. Brenner, and M.J. Aziz. Molecular dynamics of single-particle impac ts predicts phase diagrams for large scale pattern formation. Nature Communications, 2:276, 2011

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    Scott A. Norris. Pycraters: A python framework for the c ollection of crater function statistics

    work page

  56. [56]

    Norris and Michael J

    Scott A. Norris and Michael J. Aziz. Ion-induced nanopa tterning of silicon: Toward a predictive model. Applied Physics Reviews , 6(1):011311, 2019

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Norris, J

    Scott A. Norris, J. Samela, K. Nordlund, M. Vestberg, an d M. Aziz. Crater functions for com- pound materials: a route to parameter estimation in coupled -pde models of ion bombardment. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B , 318B:245–252, 2014

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    S. E. Orchard. On surface levelling in viscous liquids a nd gels. Appl. Sci. Res. , 11A:451, 1962

    work page 1962

  59. [59]

    Davis, and S

    Alexander Oron, Stephen H. Davis, and S. George Bankoff. L ong-scale evolution of thin liquid films. Reviews of Modern Physics , 69:931–980, 1997

    work page 1997

  60. [60]

    Otani, X

    K. Otani, X. Chen, J. W. Hutchinson, J. F. Chervinsky, an d M. J. Aziz. Three-dimensional morphology evolution of SiO 2 patterned films under MeV ion irradiation. J. Appl. Phys. , 100:023535, 2006

    work page 2006

  61. [61]

    Theory of terraced t opographies produced by oblique-incidence ion bombardment of solid surfaces

    Daniel A Pearson and R Mark Bradley. Theory of terraced t opographies produced by oblique-incidence ion bombardment of solid surfaces. Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter, 27(1):015010, dec 2014

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    Perkinson

    Joy C. Perkinson. Nanoscale Pattern Self- Organization Under Ion Bombardment . PhD thesis, Harvard University, 2017

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Perkinson, Charbel S

    Joy C. Perkinson, Charbel S. Madi, and Michael J. Aziz. N anoscale topographic pattern formation on kr+-bombarded germanium surfaces. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, 2013

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    Perkinson, Jennifer M

    Joy C. Perkinson, Jennifer M. Swenson, Alexander DeMas i, Christa Wagenbach, Karl F. Lud- wig Jr, Scott A. Norris, and Michael J. Aziz. Sawtooth struct ure formation under nonlinear- regime ion bombardment. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 30:no. 30, 2018

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    Rudy and V.K

    A.S. Rudy and V.K. Smirnov. Hydrodynamic model of wave- ordered structures formed by ion bombardment of solids. Nuclear Instruments and Methods B , 159:52–59, 1999

    work page 1999

  66. [66]

    P. Sigmund. Theory of sputtering. I. Sputtering yield o f amorphous and polycrystalline targets. Phys. Rev. , 184:383–416, 1969

    work page 1969

  67. [67]

    P. Sigmund. A mechanism of surface micro-roughening by ion bombardment. J. Mater. Sci. , 8:1545–1553, 1973

    work page 1973

  68. [68]

    Jennifer M. Swenson. Swelling as a stabilizing mechanism during ion bombardment of thin films: an analytical and numerical study . PhD thesis, Southern Methodist University, 2018. 27

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    Swelling as a stab ilizing mechanism in irradiated thin films

    Jennifer M Swenson and Scott A Norris. Swelling as a stab ilizing mechanism in irradiated thin films. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 30(30):304003, July 2018

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    Pat- tern formation on ge by low energy ion beam erosion

    Marc Teichmann, Jan Lorbeer, Bashkim Ziberi, Frank Fro st, and Bernd Rauschenbach. Pat- tern formation on ge by low energy ion beam erosion. New Journal of Physics , 15:103029, 2013

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    Titov, A.Yu

    A.I. Titov, A.Yu. Azarov, L.M. Nikulina, and S.O. Kuche yev. Mechanism for the molecular effect in si bombarded with clusters of light atoms. Physical Review B , 2006

    work page 2006

  72. [72]

    Titov, V.S

    A.I. Titov, V.S. Belyakov, and A. Yu. Azarov. Formation of surface amorphous layers in semiconductors under low-energy light-ion irradiation: E xperiment and theory. Nuclear In- struments and Methods in Physics Research B , 212:169–178, 2003

    work page 2003

  73. [73]

    Titov, V.S

    A.I. Titov, V.S. Belyakov, and A.Yu. Azarov. Damage bui ldup in semiconductors bombarded by low-energy ions. Thin Solid Films , 515:118–121, 2006

    work page 2006

  74. [74]

    Titov and S.O

    A.I. Titov and S.O. Kucheyev. Ion beam induced amorphou s-crystalline phase transition in si: Quantitative approach. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B , 168:375–388, 2000

    work page 2000

  75. [75]

    Trinkaus

    H. Trinkaus. Dynamics of viscoelastic flow in ion tracks : Origin of plastic deformation of amorphous materials. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B , 146:204–216, 1998

    work page 1998

  76. [76]

    Trinkaus and A

    H. Trinkaus and A. I. Ryazanov. Viscoelastic model for t he plastic flow of amorphous solids under energetic ion bombardment. Physical Review Letters , 75:5072–5075, 1995

    work page 1995

  77. [77]

    C. C. Umbach, R. L. Headrick, and K.-C. Chang. Spontaneo us nanoscale corrugation of ion- eroded SiO 2: The role of ion-irradiation-enhanced viscous flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 87:246104, 2001

    work page 2001

  78. [78]

    van Dillen, A

    T. van Dillen, A. Polman, W. Fukarek, and A. van Blaadere n. Energy-dependent anisotropic deformation of colloidal silica particles under mev au irra diation. Applied Physics Letters , 78:910–912, 2001

    work page 2001

  79. [79]

    van Dillen, A

    T. van Dillen, A. Polman, P. R. Onck, and E. van der Giesse n. Anisotropic plastic deformation by viscous flow in ion tracks. Physical Review B , 71:024103, 2005

    work page 2005

  80. [80]

    van Dillen, A

    T. van Dillen, A. Polman, C. M. van Kats, and A. van Blaade ren. Ion beam-induced anisotropic plastic deformation at 300 kev. Applied Physics Letters , 83:4315–4317, 2003

    work page 2003

Showing first 80 references.