pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.23292 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-27 · 🌀 gr-qc

Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: Bumblebee gravity

Ho-Yun YuChih , Ye Shen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 03:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords energy extractionmagnetic reconnectionBumblebee gravityrotating black holesLorentz symmetry breakingcovering factorcosmic censorship
0
0 comments X

The pith

In Bumblebee gravity, greater Lorentz symmetry breaking makes energy extraction from rotating black holes via magnetic reconnection more probable and nearer the center.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how two extra parameters in Bumblebee gravity affect the process of pulling rotational energy out of a spinning black hole through magnetic reconnection in the surrounding plasma. It finds that raising the rate of Lorentz symmetry breaking and the Bumblebee charge enlarges the zones where extraction can occur and shifts those zones inward. The configuration that maximizes this effect, for a fixed amount of extractable energy, is the one in which the cosmic censorship hypothesis is only marginally violated. A sympathetic reader would care because the result ties a concrete astrophysical mechanism to observable differences that could appear in accretion flows or jets around real black holes.

Core claim

In the Kerr-Sen-like spacetime induced by Bumblebee gravity, the allowed regions for energy extraction via magnetic reconnection expand and the covering factor rises when the Lorentz symmetry breaking rate and Bumblebee charge are increased, so that successful extraction becomes more likely and occurs closer to the central black hole; the single most favorable case arises when the cosmic censorship hypothesis is only marginally not violated.

What carries the argument

The covering factor, defined as an internal property of the accretion system that quantifies its capability for extracting energy via magnetic reconnection.

If this is right

  • Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection succeeds over a wider range of plasma conditions when the Lorentz symmetry breaking rate is larger.
  • The location of peak extraction efficiency moves inward toward the event horizon as the Bumblebee charge grows.
  • For any fixed black-hole mass and spin, the configuration that yields the highest covering factor occurs at the boundary where cosmic censorship is marginally violated.
  • The extractable energy available through this channel is set by the black-hole parameters once the modified spacetime is fixed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the covering-factor increase survives more realistic plasma models, then X-ray or radio observations of jet power could place new bounds on the allowed range of Bumblebee parameters.
  • The same trend might appear in other modified-gravity spacetimes that alter the near-horizon geometry while preserving asymptotic flatness.

Load-bearing premise

The magnetic reconnection model and plasma streamline assumptions developed for ordinary Kerr spacetime remain valid without change when applied to the Kerr-Sen-like metric of Bumblebee gravity.

What would settle it

A calculation of the allowed energy-extraction regions for successively larger Bumblebee charges that shows those regions shrinking instead of expanding would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.23292 by Ho-Yun YuChih, Ye Shen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The regions in which the event horizon exists are colored from green to blue for various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Radii of the event horizon (first row), photon sphere (third row), ISCO (fourth row), and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Radii of event horizon (black solid lines), ergosphere (red solid lines), photon sphere (gold [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The a–r0 parameter planes for the combined (left panels) and circular (right panels) stream￾lines. The allowed regions for energy extraction in the cases of example sets with σ0 = 100 and ξB = π/12 are colored in azure (combined streamlines) and gold (circular streamlines). 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The ξB–r0 parameter planes for the combined (left panels) and circular (right panels) streamlines. The allowed regions for energy extraction in the cases of example sets with σ0 = 100 and a = 0.9 are colored in azure (combined streamlines) and gold (circular streamlines). 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The ξB–r0 parameter planes for the combined (left panels) and circular (right panels) streamlines. The allowed regions for energy extraction in the cases of example sets with σ0 = 100 and a = 0.998 are colored in azure (combined streamlines) and gold (circular streamlines). 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The distributions of the covering factor on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The distributions of the covering factor on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The a–r0 parameter planes for the combined (left panel) and circular (right panel) stream￾lines, where the allowed regions with σ0 = 100 and ξB = π/12, along with the ergoregions, are shown for the cases of Point 2 (upper panel) and Point 5 (lower panel). The solid, dotted, and dashed black lines represent the event horizon, photon sphere, and ISCO, respectively. 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The ξB–r0 parameter planes for the combined (left panel) and circular (right panel) stream￾lines, where the allowed regions and ergoregions with a = 0.998 are shown for the cases of Point 2 (upper panels) and Point 5 (lower panels). The solid, dotted, and dashed black lines represent the event horizon, photon sphere, and ISCO, respectively. The dotted white lines in the left panels repre￾sent the best ori… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Many efforts were made in order to better understand the energy extraction via magnetic reconnection from a rotating black hole, following the work of Comisso and Asenjo in 2021. We also tried to make some progress in our previous works, in which we discussed differences between bulk plasma with different streamlines and also defined the covering factor as an internal property of an accretion system to quantify its capability on extracting energy via magnetic reconnection from its central black hole. In this study, we aim to explore this topic within the framework of a Kerr-Sen-like spacetime induced from Bumblebee gravity, which, among various alternative theories of gravity beyond pure Einstein gravity, stands out as a promising candidate for explaining certain high energy astrophysical phenomena. More specifically, we would like to analyze the influence of the rate of Lorentz symmetry breaking and the Bumblebee charge, the two additional parameters in Bumblebee gravity except for the black hole mass and spin, on the energy extraction via magnetic reconnection. By analyzing the allowed regions for energy extraction and the variations of covering factor, we find that energy extraction becomes more likely to succeed and tends to occur closer to the central region when the spacetime carries bigger rate of Lorentz symmetry breaking and Bumblebee charge. Furthermore, our results indicate that the most favorable spacetime configuration for energy extraction via magnetic reconnection, when the extractable energy of the central black hole is determined, corresponds to the scenario in which the cosmic censorship hypothesis is marginally not violated.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper extends the Comisso-Asenjo 2021 magnetic reconnection framework for energy extraction from Kerr black holes to a Kerr-Sen-like metric in Bumblebee gravity. It introduces two additional parameters—the Lorentz symmetry breaking rate and the Bumblebee charge—and analyzes their effects on the allowed regions for successful extraction and on the covering factor (defined as an internal accretion-system property). The central claim is that larger values of both parameters make extraction more likely and shift it closer to the central region, with the most favorable configuration occurring when the cosmic censorship hypothesis is marginally violated.

Significance. If the transplantation of the reconnection model proves valid, the work offers a systematic parameter study of how Lorentz violation and Bumblebee charge modify black-hole energy extraction, potentially linking modified-gravity effects to high-energy astrophysical observables such as jets or flares. The covering-factor diagnostic is a useful internal metric that builds directly on the authors’ prior papers. The result is falsifiable in principle through future observations or numerical simulations once the model assumptions are explicitly verified for the new spacetime.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Bumblebee metric and reconnection setup): the energy-extraction inequalities and plasma-streamline assumptions are imported from the Kerr case without re-derivation of the frame-dragging angular velocity or the null-geodesic conditions in the presence of the vector condensate; the modified Killing vectors alter the ergosphere, so the transplant is load-bearing for the claim that extraction occurs closer to the horizon with increasing parameters.
  2. [§4.1] §4.1 (Allowed regions): the reported trends with Lorentz-breaking rate and Bumblebee charge are obtained by direct substitution into the Comisso-Asenjo inequalities; no explicit check is provided that the magnetic-field-line angular velocity Ω_F retains the same functional form under the Bumblebee line element.
  3. [§5] §5 (Covering factor and cosmic censorship): the conclusion that the optimum occurs at marginal CCH violation fixes the extractable energy and then varies the covering factor; the paper does not demonstrate robustness of the covering-factor curves to changes in the post-hoc streamline choices or to the altered null geodesics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: no quantitative error estimates or explicit ranges for the covering-factor variations are stated, making it difficult to assess the magnitude of the reported trends.
  2. [Throughout] Notation: the symbols for the Lorentz-breaking rate and Bumblebee charge should be defined once at first use and used consistently thereafter to avoid ambiguity in the parameter scans.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript extending the magnetic reconnection energy extraction framework to a Kerr-Sen-like spacetime in Bumblebee gravity. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate to strengthen the derivations and robustness checks.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Bumblebee metric and reconnection setup): the energy-extraction inequalities and plasma-streamline assumptions are imported from the Kerr case without re-derivation of the frame-dragging angular velocity or the null-geodesic conditions in the presence of the vector condensate; the modified Killing vectors alter the ergosphere, so the transplant is load-bearing for the claim that extraction occurs closer to the horizon with increasing parameters.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's point that explicit re-derivation strengthens the presentation. The Bumblebee-induced metric preserves the same Killing vectors ∂_t and ∂_φ as the Kerr case, so the frame-dragging angular velocity retains the form Ω = −g_tφ/g_φφ, albeit with metric components modified by the Lorentz-breaking parameter ℓ and Bumblebee charge q. The ergosphere is located where g_tt = 0, and the energy-extraction conditions follow from the conserved energy and angular momentum along null geodesics. We will add a dedicated subsection in §3 (and a short appendix) that explicitly recomputes the ergosphere boundary, confirms the null-geodesic conditions, and shows how the modified Ω enters the reconnection inequalities. This will make the transplantation transparent without altering the reported trends. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1] §4.1 (Allowed regions): the reported trends with Lorentz-breaking rate and Bumblebee charge are obtained by direct substitution into the Comisso-Asenjo inequalities; no explicit check is provided that the magnetic-field-line angular velocity Ω_F retains the same functional form under the Bumblebee line element.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that we performed direct substitution. In the model, Ω_F is set to a fixed fraction of the horizon angular velocity Ω_H = −g_tφ/g_φφ evaluated at the event horizon. Because the Bumblebee metric modifies g_tφ and g_φφ, Ω_H (and therefore Ω_F) acquires an explicit dependence on ℓ and q. We will insert an explicit calculation of Ω_F in §4.1, demonstrating that its functional form remains Ω_F = κ Ω_H with the same constant κ used in the Kerr case, while the numerical value of Ω_H changes with the new parameters. This check will be added to the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5] §5 (Covering factor and cosmic censorship): the conclusion that the optimum occurs at marginal CCH violation fixes the extractable energy and then varies the covering factor; the paper does not demonstrate robustness of the covering-factor curves to changes in the post-hoc streamline choices or to the altered null geodesics.

    Authors: We agree that a robustness discussion improves the manuscript. The covering factor is defined as an internal accretion-system diagnostic independent of the specific geodesic details once the energy-extraction inequalities are satisfied. The trends we report arise after fixing the extractable energy (i.e., fixing M and a while varying ℓ and q up to the marginal CCH boundary). To address the concern, we will add a short paragraph and one supplementary figure in §5 showing that the covering-factor curves remain qualitatively unchanged under ±10 % variations in the streamline parameters adopted from our prior works and that the null-geodesic conditions continue to hold throughout the explored parameter space. This will be included in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Covering factor and reconnection framework transplanted from prior self-citations without re-derivation for Bumblebee metric

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "we also tried to make some progress in our previous works, in which we discussed differences between bulk plasma with different streamlines and also defined the covering factor as an internal property of an accretion system to quantify its capability on extracting energy via magnetic reconnection from its central black hole. In this study, we aim to explore this topic within the framework of a Kerr-Sen-like spacetime induced from Bumblebee gravity... By analyzing the allowed regions for energy extraction and the variations of covering factor, we find that energy extraction becomes more likely"

    The covering factor is introduced as a pre-defined internal property from the authors' prior papers and then directly applied to compute extraction capability and trends versus Lorentz-breaking rate and Bumblebee charge in the new metric. The quantification step therefore inherits its functional form from the self-citation rather than being re-derived from the Bumblebee line element.

full rationale

The paper's central results on how Lorentz-breaking rate and Bumblebee charge affect allowed regions and covering factor rest on direct substitution into the Comisso-Asenjo 2021 reconnection inequalities and the authors' earlier definition of covering factor. No independent re-derivation of plasma streamlines, magnetic field angular velocity, or energy-extraction condition is shown for the modified Killing vectors and ergosphere of the Kerr-Sen-like Bumblebee line element. This creates partial circularity via self-citation load-bearing, but the metric substitution itself supplies new parameter dependence and the external 2021 reference prevents full reduction to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the imported reconnection model, the explicit form of the Bumblebee-induced metric, and the definition of the covering factor; no new particles are postulated, but the two extra parameters function as free parameters whose values are varied to map trends.

free parameters (2)
  • Lorentz symmetry breaking rate
    Additional parameter in Bumblebee gravity varied to study its effect on extraction regions; value not fixed by external data in the abstract.
  • Bumblebee charge
    Second additional parameter varied independently; controls the strength of the Bumblebee field contribution to the metric.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The magnetic reconnection efficiency formulas derived for Kerr spacetime remain applicable after substitution of the Bumblebee metric.
    Invoked when the allowed regions for energy extraction are computed from the new spacetime.
  • domain assumption The covering factor can be treated as a well-defined internal property of the accretion flow independent of the specific gravity theory.
    Used to quantify extraction capability across different parameter values.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5790 in / 1690 out tokens · 28588 ms · 2026-05-18T03:34:37.087128+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Magnetic reconnection in five-dimensional Kerr black hole

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Magnetic reconnection enables higher energy extraction efficiency from singly-rotating five-dimensional Kerr black holes than from doubly-rotating ones and can exceed the Blandford-Znajek process in the single-rotation case.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A Magnetohydrodynamic Model for the Formation of Episodic Jets

    F. Yuan, J. Lin, K. Wu, and L. C. Ho, “A Magnetohydrodynamic Model for the Formation of Episodic Jets,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.395(2009) 2183–2188,arXiv:0811.2893 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    Modeling the inner part of the jet in M87: Confronting jet morphology with theory,

    H. Yang, F. Yuan, H. Li, Y. Mizuno, F. Guo, R. Lu, L. C. Ho, X. Lin, A. A. Zdziarski, and J. Wang, “Modeling the inner part of the jet in M87: Confronting jet morphology with theory,” Sci. Adv.10no. 12, (2024) adn3544,arXiv:2403.15950 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Revisiting flares in Sagittarius A* based on general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic numerical simulations of black hole accretion,

    L. Xi and Y. Feng, “Revisiting flares in Sagittarius A* based on general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic numerical simulations of black hole accretion,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.531no. 3, (2024) 3136–3150,arXiv:2405.17408 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    The impact of resistivity on the variability of black hole accretion flows,

    A. Nathanail, Y. Mizuno, I. Contopoulos, C. M. Fromm, A. Cruz-Osorio, K. Moriyama, and L. Rezzolla, “The impact of resistivity on the variability of black hole accretion flows,” Astron. Astrophys.693(2025) A56,arXiv:2411.16684 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Magnetic Reconnection and Hot Spot Formation in Black Hole Accretion Disks,

    B. Ripperda, F. Bacchini, and A. Philippov, “Magnetic Reconnection and Hot Spot Formation in Black Hole Accretion Disks,” Astrophys. J.900no. 2, (2020) 100,arXiv:2003.04330 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Magnetic reconnection plasmoid model for Sagittarius A* flares,

    N. Aimar, A. Dmytriiev, F. H. Vincent, I. E. Mellah, T. Paumard, G. Perrin, and A. Zech, “Magnetic reconnection plasmoid model for Sagittarius A* flares,” Astron. Astrophys.672 (2023) A62,arXiv:2301.11874 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    GRMHD modelling of accretion flow around Sagittarius A* constrained by EHT measurements,

    G. Sen, D. Maity, and S. Das, “GRMHD modelling of accretion flow around Sagittarius A* constrained by EHT measurements,”arXiv:2510.03602 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,” Riv. Nuovo Cim.1(1969) 252–276

    work page 1969

  9. [9]

    Energy Limits on the Penrose Process,

    R. M. Wald, “Energy Limits on the Penrose Process,” Astrophys. J.191(1974) 231

    work page 1974

  10. [10]

    Energy Extraction from a Rotating Black Hole by Magnetic Reconnection in Ergosphere

    S. Koide and K. Arai, “Energy Extraction from a Rotating Black Hole by Magnetic Reconnection in Ergosphere,” Astrophys. J.682(2008) 1124,arXiv:0805.0044 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  11. [11]

    Magnetic Reconnection as a Mechanism for Energy Extraction from Rotating Black Holes,

    L. Comisso and F. A. Asenjo, “Magnetic Reconnection as a Mechanism for Energy Extraction from Rotating Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D103no. 2, (2021) 023014,arXiv:2012.00879 [astro-ph.HE]. 27

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Rotating Magnetospheres: an Exact 3-D Solution,

    F. C. Michel, “Rotating Magnetospheres: an Exact 3-D Solution,” Astrophys. J.180(Mar.,

    work page

  13. [13]

    Spacetime approach to force-free magnetospheres,

    S. E. Gralla and T. Jacobson, “Spacetime approach to force-free magnetospheres,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.445no. 3, (2014) 2500–2534,arXiv:1401.6159 [astro-ph.HE]. [Erratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 534, 1541 (2024)]

    work page arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    McKinney

    A. Tchekhovskoy, R. Narayan, and J. C. McKinney, “Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. Lett.418no. 1, (11, 2011) L79–L83, https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article-pdf/418/1/L79/56939896/mnrasl 418 1 l79.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01147.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01147.x 2011

  15. [15]

    General Relativistic Force-Free Electrodynamics: A New Code and Applications to Black Hole Magnetospheres

    J. C. McKinney, “General relativistic force-free electrodynamics: a new code and applications to black hole magnetospheres,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.367(2006) 1797–1807, arXiv:astro-ph/0601410

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  16. [16]

    Particle Acceleration in Collisionless Magnetically Arrested Disks,

    J. Vos, B. Cerutti, M. Moscibrodzka, and K. Parfrey, “Particle Acceleration in Collisionless Magnetically Arrested Disks,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 1, (2025) 015201,arXiv:2410.19061 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    General Theory of the Plasmoid Instability

    L. Comisso, M. Lingam, Y. M. Huang, and A. Bhattacharjee, “General Theory of the Plasmoid Instability,” Physics of Plasmas23(2016) 100702,arXiv:1608.04692 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Plasmoid Instability in Forming Current Sheets

    L. Comisso, M. Lingam, Y.-M. Huang, and A. Bhattacharjee, “Plasmoid Instability in Forming Current Sheets,” Astrophys. J.850no. 2, (2017) 142,arXiv:1707.01862 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Lorentz breaking Kerr–Sen and Kiselev black holes,

    A. Carleo, G. Lambiase, and L. Mastrototaro, “Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Lorentz breaking Kerr–Sen and Kiselev black holes,” Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 9, (2022) 776, arXiv:2206.12988 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Magnetic reconnection and energy extraction from a spinning black hole with broken Lorentz symmetry,

    M. Khodadi, “Magnetic reconnection and energy extraction from a spinning black hole with broken Lorentz symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D105no. 2, (2022) 023025,arXiv:2201.02765 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Effects of tidal charge on magnetic reconnection and energy extraction from spinning braneworld black hole,

    S.-W. Wei, H.-M. Wang, Y.-P. Zhang, and Y.-X. Liu, “Effects of tidal charge on magnetic reconnection and energy extraction from spinning braneworld black hole,” JCAP04no. 04, (2022) 050,arXiv:2201.12729 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Energy Extraction via Magnetic Reconnection in the Ergosphere of a Rotating Non-Kerr Black Hole,

    W. Liu, “Energy Extraction via Magnetic Reconnection in the Ergosphere of a Rotating Non-Kerr Black Hole,” Astrophys. J.925no. 2, (2022) 149,arXiv:2204.07338 [astro-ph.HE]. 28

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Extracting energy via magnetic reconnection from Kerr–de Sitter black holes,

    C.-H. Wang, C.-Q. Pang, and S.-W. Wei, “Extracting energy via magnetic reconnection from Kerr–de Sitter black holes,” Phys. Rev. D106no. 12, (2022) 124050,arXiv:2209.08837 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Kerr-Newman-modified-gravity black hole’s impact on the magnetic reconnection,

    S. Shaymatov, M. Alloqulov, B. Ahmedov, and A. Wang, “Kerr-Newman-modified-gravity black hole’s impact on the magnetic reconnection,” Phys. Rev. D110no. 4, (2024) 044005, arXiv:2307.03012 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in magnetized black holes,

    S.-J. Zhang, “Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in magnetized black holes,” JCAP 07(2024) 042,arXiv:2405.16941 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Magnetic reconnection and energy extraction from a Konoplya–Zhidenko rotating non-Kerr black hole,

    F. Long, S. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, “Magnetic reconnection and energy extraction from a Konoplya–Zhidenko rotating non-Kerr black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 1, (2025) 26, arXiv:2409.11942 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Energy Extraction via Magnetic Reconnection in Kerr-Sen-AdS 4 Black Hole: Circular Plasma and Plunging Plasma,

    X.-X. Zeng and K. Wang, “Energy Extraction via Magnetic Reconnection in Kerr-Sen-AdS 4 Black Hole: Circular Plasma and Plunging Plasma,”arXiv:2507.10520 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Energy extraction from the Kerr-Bertotti-Robinson black hole via magnetic reconnection in a circular and a plunging plasma,

    X.-X. Zeng and K. Wang, “Energy extraction from the Kerr-Bertotti-Robinson black hole via magnetic reconnection in a circular and a plunging plasma,” Phys. Rev. D112no. 6, (2025) 064032,arXiv:2507.21777 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Rotating Charged Black Hole Solution in Heterotic String Theory

    A. Sen, “Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.69 (1992) 1006–1009,arXiv:hep-th/9204046

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  30. [30]

    Lorentz and CPT breaking in gamma-ray burst neutrinos from string theory,

    C. Li and B.-Q. Ma, “Lorentz and CPT breaking in gamma-ray burst neutrinos from string theory,” JHEP03(2023) 230,arXiv:2303.04765 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking effects on GRBs jets arising from neutrino pair annihilation process near a black hole,

    M. Khodadi, G. Lambiase, and L. Mastrototaro, “Spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking effects on GRBs jets arising from neutrino pair annihilation process near a black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 3, (2023) 239,arXiv:2302.14200 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Strange quark stars and condensate dark stars in Bumblebee gravity,

    G. Panotopoulos and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, “Strange quark stars and condensate dark stars in Bumblebee gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B1017(2025) 116956,arXiv:2409.05801 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    An exact Schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model

    R. Casana, A. Cavalcante, F. P. Poulis, and E. B. Santos, “Exact Schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model,” Phys. Rev. D97no. 10, (2018) 104001,arXiv:1711.02273 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Jha and A

    S. K. Jha and A. Rahaman, “Bumblebee gravity with a Kerr-Sen-like solution and its Shadow,” Eur. Phys. J. C81no. 4, (2021) 345,arXiv:2011.14916 [gr-qc]. 29

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Exact Kerr-like solution and its shadow in a gravity model with spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking,

    C. Ding, C. Liu, R. Casana, and A. Cavalcante, “Exact Kerr-like solution and its shadow in a gravity model with spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking,” Eur. Phys. J. C80no. 3, (2020) 178,arXiv:1910.02674 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Static spherical vacuum solutions in the bumblebee gravity model,

    R. Xu, D. Liang, and L. Shao, “Static spherical vacuum solutions in the bumblebee gravity model,” Phys. Rev. D107no. 2, (2023) 024011,arXiv:2209.02209 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Bumblebee cosmology: Tests using distance- and time-redshift probes,

    X. Zhu, R. Xu, and D. Xu, “Bumblebee cosmology: Tests using distance- and time-redshift probes,”arXiv:2411.18559 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Study of Einstein-bumblebee gravity with Kerr-Sen-like solution in the presence of a dispersive medium,

    S. K. Jha, S. Aziz, and A. Rahaman, “Study of Einstein-bumblebee gravity with Kerr-Sen-like solution in the presence of a dispersive medium,” Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 2, (2022) 106, arXiv:2103.17021 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Constraint on parameters of a rotating black hole in Einstein-bumblebee theory by quasi-periodic oscillations,

    Z. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, “Constraint on parameters of a rotating black hole in Einstein-bumblebee theory by quasi-periodic oscillations,” Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 6, (2022) 528, arXiv:2112.02895 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Investigating rotating black holes in bumblebee gravity: insights from EHT observations,

    S. U. Islam, S. G. Ghosh, and S. D. Maharaj, “Investigating rotating black holes in bumblebee gravity: insights from EHT observations,” JCAP12(2024) 047,arXiv:2410.05395 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Probing bumblebee gravity with black hole X-ray data,

    J. Gu, S. Riaz, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, and C. Bambi, “Probing bumblebee gravity with black hole X-ray data,” Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 8, (2022) 708,arXiv:2206.14733 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Energy extraction from a Kerr black hole via magnetic reconnection within the plunging region,

    B. Chen, Y. Hou, J. Li, and Y. Shen, “Energy extraction from a Kerr black hole via magnetic reconnection within the plunging region,” Phys. Rev. D110no. 6, (2024) 063003, arXiv:2405.11488 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: The plunging bulk plasma and orientation angle,

    Y. Shen, H.-Y. YuChih, and B. Chen, “Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: The plunging bulk plasma and orientation angle,” Phys. Rev. D110 no. 12, (2024) 123010,arXiv:2409.07345 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: Parameters in reconnection models,

    Y. Shen and H.-Y. YuChih, “Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: Parameters in reconnection models,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 2, (2025) 023003, arXiv:2412.03010 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Black-hole electrodynamics - an absolute-space/universal-time formulation,

    D. MacDonald and K. S. Thorne, “Black-hole electrodynamics - an absolute-space/universal-time formulation,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.198(1982) 345–383

    work page 1982

  46. [46]

    Why does steady-state magnetic reconnection have a maximum local rate of order 0.1?

    Y.-H. Liu, M. Hesse, F. Guo, W. Daughton, H. Li, P. A. Cassak, and M. A. Shay, “Why does steady-state magnetic reconnection have a maximum local rate of order 0.1?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118no. 8, (2017) 085101,arXiv:1611.07859 [physics.plasm-ph]. 30

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    On the relativistic magnetic reconnection

    Y. E. Lyubarsky, “On the relativistic magnetic reconnection,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.358 (2005) 113–119,arXiv:astro-ph/0501392

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  48. [48]

    Thermal-inertial effects on magnetic reconnection in relativistic pair plasmas

    L. Comisso and F. A. Asenjo, “Thermal-inertial effects on magnetic reconnection in relativistic pair plasmas,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 045001,arXiv:1402.1115 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    Gravity, Lorentz Violation, and the Standard Model

    V. A. Kostelecky, “Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 105009,arXiv:hep-th/0312310

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  50. [50]

    Signals for Lorentz Violation in Post-Newtonian Gravity

    Q. G. Bailey and V. A. Kostelecky, “Signals for Lorentz violation in post-Newtonian gravity,” Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 045001,arXiv:gr-qc/0603030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  51. [51]

    Dynamic instability analysis for bumblebee black holes: The odd parity,

    Z.-F. Mai, R. Xu, D. Liang, and L. Shao, “Dynamic instability analysis for bumblebee black holes: The odd parity,” Phys. Rev. D109no. 8, (2024) 084076,arXiv:2401.07757 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Neutron stars in the bumblebee theory of gravity,

    P. Ji, Z. Li, L. Yang, R. Xu, Z. Hu, and L. Shao, “Neutron stars in the bumblebee theory of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D110no. 10, (2024) 104057,arXiv:2409.04805 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Camilloni and L

    F. Camilloni and L. Rezzolla, “Self-consistent Multidimensional Penrose Process Driven by Magnetic Reconnection,” Astrophys. J. Lett.982no. 1, (2025) L31,arXiv:2411.04184 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Finite-Resistivity Instabilities of a Sheet Pinch,

    H. P. Furth, J. Killeen, and M. N. Rosenbluth, “Finite-Resistivity Instabilities of a Sheet Pinch,” Physics of Fluids6no. 4, (Apr., 1963) 459–484

    work page 1963

  55. [55]

    Dynamo-driven plasmoid formation from a current-sheet instability

    F. Ebrahimi, “Dynamo-driven plasmoid formation from a current-sheet instability,” Phys. Plasmas23(2016) 120705,arXiv:1610.09050 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  56. [56]

    Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection in Astrophysical Plasmas: A Powerful Mechanism of Nonthermal Emission,

    L. Sironi, D. A. Uzdensky, and D. Giannios, “Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection in Astrophysical Plasmas: A Powerful Mechanism of Nonthermal Emission,”arXiv:2506.02101 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    Dissipation and particle acceleration in astrophysical jets with velocity and magnetic shear: Interaction of Kelvin-Helmholtz and Drift-Kink Instabilities,

    T. H. N. Tsung, G. R. Werner, D. A. Uzdensky, and M. C. Begelman, “Dissipation and particle acceleration in astrophysical jets with velocity and magnetic shear: Interaction of Kelvin-Helmholtz and Drift-Kink Instabilities,”arXiv:2501.04090 [astro-ph.HE]. 31

    work page arXiv