pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.25704 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-29 · ✦ hep-lat · cond-mat.stat-mech· cs.LG· hep-ph

Scaling flow-based approaches for topology sampling in SU(3) gauge theory

Claudio Bonanno , Andrea Bulgarelli , Elia Cellini , Alessandro Nada , Dario Panfalone , Davide Vadacchino , Lorenzo Verzichelli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 03:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat cond-mat.stat-mechcs.LGhep-ph
keywords lattice gauge theorySU(3) Yang-Millstopological freezingtopological chargeopen boundary conditionsnon-equilibrium Monte Carlostochastic normalizing flows
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

A non-equilibrium Monte Carlo method with temporary open boundaries reduces topological autocorrelation exactly in SU(3) lattice gauge theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an out-of-equilibrium simulation strategy to overcome topological freezing, which causes the topological charge to change too rarely in standard Monte Carlo runs as the lattice spacing shrinks toward zero. Open boundary conditions are used temporarily to accelerate topology updates, after which a controlled non-equilibrium evolution gradually restores periodic boundary conditions and cancels all resulting artifacts. The authors demonstrate full scaling control in four-dimensional SU(3) Yang-Mills theory down to lattice spacings of 0.045 fm and show that a customized stochastic normalizing flow can replace the purely stochastic step for even lower computational cost.

Core claim

By employing open boundary conditions to decorrelate the topological charge and then applying a non-equilibrium Monte Carlo process that gradually switches on periodic boundary conditions, all unphysical effects are removed exactly, yielding unbiased sampling with greatly reduced autocorrelation times while preserving the correct continuum limit.

What carries the argument

non-equilibrium Monte Carlo evolution that gradually switches periodic boundary conditions on after a phase of open boundaries

If this is right

  • Topology can be sampled efficiently at lattice spacings well below 0.05 fm without prohibitive autocorrelation times.
  • Continuum extrapolations of topological observables become feasible with controlled errors.
  • The same boundary-switching protocol scales to larger volumes once the cost of the non-equilibrium step is optimized.
  • Replacing the stochastic evolution with a trained stochastic normalizing flow reduces the computational overhead further while keeping the exact cancellation property.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The boundary-switching idea could be combined with other slow-mode mitigation techniques such as multigrid or parallel tempering.
  • If the flow-based variant generalizes to dynamical fermions, it may enable topology sampling in full QCD simulations near the continuum.
  • Similar non-equilibrium protocols might address other topological or winding-number observables in gauge theories with different gauge groups.

Load-bearing premise

The non-equilibrium Monte Carlo procedure exactly cancels all unphysical effects of the temporary open boundaries without introducing new systematic biases or hidden scaling violations.

What would settle it

A direct comparison at the smallest lattice spacing showing that the distribution of topological charge or its susceptibility differs from results obtained with fully periodic boundaries and sufficient statistics would falsify the exact cancellation.

read the original abstract

We develop a methodology based on out-of-equilibrium simulations to mitigate topological freezing when approaching the continuum limit of lattice gauge theories. We reduce the autocorrelation of the topological charge employing open boundary conditions, while removing exactly their unphysical effects using a non-equilibrium Monte Carlo approach in which periodic boundary conditions are gradually switched on. We perform a detailed analysis of the computational costs of this strategy in the case of the four-dimensional $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ Yang-Mills theory. After achieving full control of the scaling, we outline a clear strategy to sample topology efficiently in the continuum limit, which we check at lattice spacings as small as $0.045$ fm. We also generalize this approach by designing a customized Stochastic Normalizing Flow for evolutions in the boundary conditions, obtaining superior performances with respect to the purely stochastic non-equilibrium approach, and paving the way for more efficient future flow-based solutions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a methodology based on out-of-equilibrium simulations to mitigate topological freezing in four-dimensional SU(3) Yang-Mills theory. Open boundary conditions are used to reduce the autocorrelation of the topological charge, after which a non-equilibrium Monte Carlo protocol gradually switches to periodic boundary conditions to remove exactly the unphysical boundary effects. The authors analyze computational costs, claim full scaling control, validate the approach at lattice spacings down to 0.045 fm, and extend the method with a customized stochastic normalizing flow that outperforms the purely stochastic version.

Significance. If the non-equilibrium switching protocol preserves the exact equilibrium measure for the topological charge without residual biases or hidden scaling violations, the work would provide a practical route to efficient topology sampling in the continuum limit of lattice gauge theories. The cost analysis and numerical checks at fine spacings, together with the flow-based generalization, would represent a concrete advance over standard periodic-boundary simulations that suffer from severe topological freezing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / non-equilibrium protocol] Abstract and non-equilibrium Monte Carlo section: the central claim that the gradual switch from open to periodic boundary conditions removes 'exactly' all unphysical effects on the topological charge requires explicit verification that the finite switching schedule remains ergodic and does not correlate with topological sectors. Any residual bias at a=0.045 fm would undermine the continuum extrapolation strategy.
  2. [Scaling analysis / results] Scaling control and results section: the assertion of 'full control of the scaling' and the check at 0.045 fm must demonstrate that the non-equilibrium averaging procedure introduces no new systematic biases or scaling violations in topological observables; otherwise the extrapolation strategy rests on an untested assumption.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the precise definition and implementation details of the switching schedule (e.g., number of steps, update algorithm during the protocol) to allow reproducibility.
  2. [Computational costs] In the cost-analysis figures or tables, ensure direct quantitative comparison of autocorrelation times and total computational effort against standard periodic-boundary runs at the same lattice spacings.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below, providing additional context from our analysis and indicating planned revisions to strengthen the discussion of ergodicity, bias control, and scaling.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / non-equilibrium protocol] Abstract and non-equilibrium Monte Carlo section: the central claim that the gradual switch from open to periodic boundary conditions removes 'exactly' all unphysical effects on the topological charge requires explicit verification that the finite switching schedule remains ergodic and does not correlate with topological sectors. Any residual bias at a=0.045 fm would undermine the continuum extrapolation strategy.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of ergodicity for finite schedules is important. The non-equilibrium protocol is constructed so that, for any finite but sufficiently adiabatic switching schedule, the final configurations are distributed according to the exact periodic-boundary equilibrium measure; this follows from the reversibility of the underlying Markov process and the absence of a net work term that would bias sectors. In the manuscript we already demonstrate that topological charge changes occur during switching and that the resulting charge distribution at a=0.045 fm is consistent with coarser-lattice results obtained with periodic boundaries. To make this verification more explicit we will add, in the revised version, a dedicated subsection with (i) acceptance-rate and sector-tunneling diagnostics as functions of switching time and (ii) a direct comparison of the topological susceptibility obtained with two different switching schedules at the finest spacing. These additions will confirm that residual bias remains below the statistical uncertainty for the schedules employed. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Scaling analysis / results] Scaling control and results section: the assertion of 'full control of the scaling' and the check at 0.045 fm must demonstrate that the non-equilibrium averaging procedure introduces no new systematic biases or scaling violations in topological observables; otherwise the extrapolation strategy rests on an untested assumption.

    Authors: We share the referee’s concern that any new systematic from the non-equilibrium step must be quantified before claiming full scaling control. Our cost analysis already shows that the total computational effort scales as expected from the known volume and autocorrelation scaling of open-boundary simulations plus a controlled overhead from the switching phase; no anomalous growth is observed down to a=0.045 fm. In addition, the topological susceptibility extracted after switching agrees, within errors, with the value obtained from the stochastic normalizing-flow variant, providing an internal cross-check. Nevertheless, to address the possibility of hidden scaling violations we will expand the scaling section with an explicit study of the dependence of the final observables on the switching rate at the two finest spacings and will include a short discussion of the theoretical bound on the bias induced by a finite switching schedule. These revisions will make the absence of new systematic effects fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new non-equilibrium BC-switching method with independent numerical validation

full rationale

The paper introduces a methodology that combines open boundary conditions to reduce topological autocorrelation with a non-equilibrium Monte Carlo protocol that gradually switches to periodic boundaries to cancel unphysical effects. This is presented as a new approach, followed by computational cost analysis, scaling control, and explicit checks at a=0.045 fm, plus a generalization to Stochastic Normalizing Flows. No quoted equations or steps reduce the central claim to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the result is supported by direct simulation rather than by construction from its own inputs. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted with certainty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5714 in / 1059 out tokens · 32217 ms · 2026-05-18T03:17:31.200602+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Testing machine-learned distributions against Monte Carlo data for the QCD chiral phase transition

    hep-lat 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Conditional MAFs interpolate QCD chiral phase structure across coupling, mass, and volume, reproducing reweighting while cutting required ensembles despite bias near transitions.

  2. Scalable Generative Sampling and Multilevel Estimation for Lattice Field Theories Near Criticality

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A hierarchical generative model for critical lattice scalar field theories achieves orders-of-magnitude lower autocorrelation times than HMC while enabling exact multilevel Monte Carlo.

  3. Machine learning for four-dimensional SU(3) lattice gauge theories

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Machine learning generative models and renormalization-group neural networks are used to enhance gauge field sampling and learn fixed-point actions in 4D SU(3) lattice gauge theories, with presented scaling results to...

  4. Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    A pedagogical review summarizing analytic predictions and recent lattice results for theta-dependence and topological susceptibility in QCD.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

172 extracted references · 172 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 64 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Hybrid Monte Carlo and topological modes of full QCD

    B. Alles, G. Boyd, M. D’Elia, A. Di Giacomo and E. Vicari,Hybrid Monte Carlo and topological modes of full QCD,Phys. Lett. B389(1996) 107 [hep-lat/9607049]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  2. [2]

    Theta dependence of SU(N) gauge theories

    L. Del Debbio, H. Panagopoulos and E. Vicari,θdependence ofSU(N)gauge theories, JHEP08(2002) 044 [hep-th/0204125]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  3. [3]

    Critical slowing down of topological modes

    L. Del Debbio, G. M. Manca and E. Vicari,Critical slowing down of topological modes, Phys. Lett. B594(2004) 315 [hep-lat/0403001]. [4]ALPHAcollaboration, S. Schaefer, R. Sommer and F. Virotta,Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations,Nucl. Phys. B845(2011) 93 [1009.5228]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  4. [4]

    L¨ uscher,Topology of Lattice Gauge Fields,Commun

    M. L¨ uscher,Topology of Lattice Gauge Fields,Commun. Math. Phys.85(1982) 39

    work page 1982

  5. [5]

    Precision study of the SU(3) topological susceptibility in the continuum

    S. D¨ urr, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling and T. Kurth,Precision study of the SU(3) topological susceptibility in the continuum,JHEP04(2007) 055 [hep-lat/0612021]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    M. C` e, C. Consonni, G. P. Engel and L. Giusti,Non-Gaussianities in the topological charge distribution of theSU(3)Yang–Mills theory,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 074502 [1506.06052]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    $\theta$ dependence in $SU(3)$ Yang-Mills theory from analytic continuation

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia and A. Scapellato,θdependence inSU(3)Yang-Mills theory from analytic continuation,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 025028 [1512.01544]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Athenodorou and M

    A. Athenodorou and M. Teper,The glueball spectrum of SU(3) gauge theory in 3 + 1 dimensions,JHEP11(2020) 172 [2007.06422]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Bonanno,The topological susceptibility slopeχ ′ of the pure-gauge SU(3) Yang-Mills theory,JHEP01(2024) 116 [2311.06646]

    C. Bonanno,The topological susceptibility slopeχ ′ of the pure-gauge SU(3) Yang-Mills theory,JHEP01(2024) 116 [2311.06646]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Topological susceptibility and excess kurtosis in SU(3) Yang-Mills theory

    S. D¨ urr and G. Fuwa,The topological susceptibility and excess kurtosis in SU(3) Yang-Mills theory,2501.08217

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Topological susceptibility in the SU(3) gauge theory

    L. Del Debbio, L. Giusti and C. Pica,Topological susceptibility in theSU(3)gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 032003 [hep-th/0407052]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  12. [12]

    Universality of the topological susceptibility in the SU(3) gauge theory

    M. L¨ uscher and F. Palombi,Universality of the topological susceptibility in theSU(3)gauge theory,JHEP09(2010) 110 [1008.0732]. [14]ETMcollaboration, K. Cichy, E. Garcia-Ramos, K. Jansen, K. Ottnad and C. Urbach, Non-perturbative Test of the Witten-Veneziano Formula from Lattice QCD,JHEP09 (2015) 020 [1504.07954]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    Bonanno, G

    C. Bonanno, G. Clemente, M. D’Elia and F. Sanfilippo,Topology via spectral projectors with staggered fermions,JHEP10(2019) 187 [1908.11832]

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    M. C` e, M. Garcia Vera, L. Giusti and S. Schaefer,The topological susceptibility in the large-Nlimit of SU(N) Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Lett. B762(2016) 232 [1607.05939]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    $\theta$ dependence of 4D $SU(N)$ gauge theories in the large-$N$ limit

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, P. Rossi and E. Vicari,θdependence of 4DSU(N)gauge theories in the large-Nlimit,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 085017 [1607.06360]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Bonanno, C

    C. Bonanno, C. Bonati and M. D’Elia,Large-N SU(N)Yang-Mills theories with milder topological freezing,JHEP03(2021) 111 [2012.14000]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Athenodorou and M

    A. Athenodorou and M. Teper,SU(N) gauge theories in 3+1 dimensions: glueball spectrum, string tensions and topology,JHEP12(2021) 082 [2106.00364]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    QCD at Fixed Topology

    R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, J. W. Negele and U. J. Wiese,QCD at fixed topology, Phys. Lett. B560(2003) 64 [hep-lat/0302005]. – 30 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  19. [19]

    S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto and T. Onogi,Finite volume QCD at fixed topological charge,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 054508 [0707.0396]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  20. [20]

    Critical slowing down and the gradient flow coupling in the Schr\"odinger functional

    P. Fritzsch, A. Ramos and F. Stollenwerk,Critical slowing down and the gradient flow coupling in the Schr¨ odinger functional,PoSLattice2013(2014) 461 [1311.7304]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Ramos Martinez and G

    A. Ramos Martinez and G. Catumba,Testing universality of gauge theories,PoS LATTICE2022(2023) 383

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Topological Susceptibility from Slabs

    W. Bietenholz, P. de Forcrand and U. Gerber,Topological Susceptibility from Slabs,JHEP 12(2015) 070 [1509.06433]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    A. Laio, G. Martinelli and F. Sanfilippo,Metadynamics surfing on topology barriers: the CP N−1 case,JHEP07(2016) 089 [1508.07270]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    L¨ uscher,Stochastic locality and master-field simulations of very large lattices,EPJ Web Conf.175(2018) 01002 [1707.09758]

    M. L¨ uscher,Stochastic locality and master-field simulations of very large lattices,EPJ Web Conf.175(2018) 01002 [1707.09758]

    work page arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Topological critical slowing down: variations on a toy model

    C. Bonati and M. D’Elia,Topological critical slowing down: variations on a toy model, Phys. Rev. E98(2018) 013308 [1709.10034]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Giusti and M

    L. Giusti and M. L¨ uscher,Topological susceptibility atT > T c from master-field simulations of the SU(3) gauge theory,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 207 [1812.02062]

    work page arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Florio, O

    A. Florio, O. Kaczmarek and L. Mazur,Open-Boundary Conditions in the Deconfined Phase,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 1039 [1903.02894]

    work page arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Funcke, K

    L. Funcke, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn,Topological vacuum structure of the Schwinger model with matrix product states,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 054507 [1908.00551]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Albandea, P

    D. Albandea, P. Hern´ andez, A. Ramos and F. Romero-L´ opez,Topological sampling through windings,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 873 [2106.14234]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Cossu, D

    G. Cossu, D. Lancastera, B. Lucini, R. Pellegrini and A. Rago,Ergodic sampling of the topological charge using the density of states,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 375 [2102.03630]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Borsanyi and D

    S. Borsanyi and D. Sexty,Topological susceptibility of pure gauge theory using Density of States,Phys. Lett. B815(2021) 136148 [2101.03383]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Fritzsch, J

    P. Fritzsch, J. Bulava, M. C` e, A. Francis, M. L¨ uscher and A. Rago,Master-field simulations of QCD,PoSLATTICE2021(2022) 465 [2111.11544]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Eichhorn, G

    T. Eichhorn, G. Fuwa, C. Hoelbling and L. Varnhorst,Parallel tempered metadynamics: Overcoming potential barriers without surfing or tunneling,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 114504 [2307.04742]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Howarth and A

    D. Howarth and A. J. Peterson,Topological charge unfreezing with AMReX,2312.11599

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Albandea, G

    D. Albandea, G. Catumba and A. Ramos,Strong CP problem in the quantum rotor,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 094512 [2402.17518]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    M. Abe, O. Morikawa and H. Suzuki,Monte Carlo Simulation of theSU(2)/Z 2 Yang–Mills Theory,2501.00286

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Finkenrath,Review on Algorithms for dynamical fermions,PoSLATTICE2022(2023) 227 [2402.11704]

    J. Finkenrath,Review on Algorithms for dynamical fermions,PoSLATTICE2022(2023) 227 [2402.11704]

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    P. A. Boyle,Advances in algorithms for solvers and gauge generation,PoS LATTICE2023(2024) 122 [2401.16620]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Finkenrath,Future trends in lattice QCD simulations,PoSEuroPLEx2023(2024) 009

    J. Finkenrath,Future trends in lattice QCD simulations,PoSEuroPLEx2023(2024) 009. – 31 –

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Lattice QCD without topology barriers

    M. L¨ uscher and S. Schaefer,Lattice QCD without topology barriers,JHEP07(2011) 036 [1105.4749]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  41. [41]

    Lattice QCD with open boundary conditions and twisted-mass reweighting

    M. Luscher and S. Schaefer,Lattice QCD with open boundary conditions and twisted-mass reweighting,Comput. Phys. Commun.184(2013) 519 [1206.2809]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    Diffusion of topological charge in lattice QCD simulations

    G. McGlynn and R. D. Mawhinney,Diffusion of topological charge in lattice QCD simulations,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 074502 [1406.4551]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    Fighting topological freezing in the two-dimensional CP$^{N-1}$ model

    M. Hasenbusch,Fighting topological freezing in the two-dimensionalCP N−1 model,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 054504 [1706.04443]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    Berni, C

    M. Berni, C. Bonanno and M. D’Elia,Large-Nexpansion andθ-dependence of2d CP N−1 models beyond the leading order,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 114509 [1911.03384]

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Bonanno,Lattice determination of the topological susceptibility slopeχ ′ of2dCP N−1 models at largeN,Phys

    C. Bonanno,Lattice determination of the topological susceptibility slopeχ ′ of2dCP N−1 models at largeN,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 014514 [2212.02330]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Bonanno, M

    C. Bonanno, M. D’Elia, B. Lucini and D. Vadacchino,Towards glueball masses of large-N SU(N) pure-gauge theories without topological freezing,Phys. Lett. B833(2022) 137281 [2205.06190]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Bonanno, M

    C. Bonanno, M. D’Elia and L. Verzichelli,Theθ-dependence of the SU(N) critical temperature at large N,JHEP02(2024) 156 [2312.12202]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Bonanno, J

    C. Bonanno, J. L. Dasilva Gol´ an, M. D’Elia, M. Garc´ ıa P´ erez and A. Giorgieri,The SU(3) twisted gradient flow strong coupling without topological freezing,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 916 [2403.13607]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Bonanno, C

    C. Bonanno, C. Bonati, M. Papace and D. Vadacchino,Theθ-dependence of the Yang-Mills spectrum from analytic continuation,JHEP05(2024) 163 [2402.03096]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Bonanno, G

    C. Bonanno, G. Clemente, M. D’Elia, L. Maio and L. Parente,Full QCD with milder topological freezing,JHEP08(2024) 236 [2404.14151]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Bonanno, A

    C. Bonanno, A. Nada and D. Vadacchino,Mitigating topological freezing using out-of-equilibrium simulations,JHEP04(2024) 126 [2402.06561]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Bulgarelli, E

    A. Bulgarelli, E. Cellini and A. Nada,Scaling of stochastic normalizing flows in SU(3) lattice gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 074517 [2412.00200]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Jarzynski's theorem for lattice gauge theory

    M. Caselle, G. Costagliola, A. Nada, M. Panero and A. Toniato,Jarzynski’s theorem for lattice gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 034503 [1604.05544]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    Caselle, E

    M. Caselle, E. Cellini, A. Nada and M. Panero,Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations,JHEP07(2022) 015 [2201.08862]

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar and P. E. Shanahan,Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 034515 [1904.12072]

    work page arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Cranmer, G

    K. Cranmer, G. Kanwar, S. Racani` ere, D. J. Rezende and P. E. Shanahan,Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics,Nature Rev. Phys.5(2023) 526 [2309.01156]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm

    M. L¨ uscher,Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm,Commun. Math. Phys.293(2010) 899 [0907.5491]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    G. P. Engel and S. Schaefer,Testing trivializing maps in the Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm, Comput. Phys. Commun.182(2011) 2107 [1102.1852]. – 32 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Rezende and S

    D. Rezende and S. Mohamed,Variational inference with normalizing flows, inInternational conference on machine learning, pp. 1530–1538, PMLR, 2015

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    Papamakarios, E

    G. Papamakarios, E. T. Nalisnick, D. J. Rezende, S. Mohamed and B. Lakshminarayanan, Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inference,J. Mach. Learn. Res.22(2021) 1

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    K. A. Nicoli, C. J. Anders, L. Funcke, T. Hartung, K. Jansen, P. Kessel et al.,Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 032001 [2007.07115]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    K. A. Nicoli, S. Nakajima, N. Strodthoff, W. Samek, K.-R. M¨ uller and P. Kessel, Asymptotically unbiased estimation of physical observables with neural samplers,Phys. Rev. E101(2020) 023304 [1910.13496]

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Del Debbio, J

    L. Del Debbio, J. M. Rossney and M. Wilson,Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for latticeϕ4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 094507 [2105.12481]

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continu- ous flows.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00283, 2022

    M. Gerdes, P. de Haan, C. Rainone, R. Bondesan and M. C. N. Cheng,Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 238 [2207.00283]

    work page arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Singha, D

    A. Singha, D. Chakrabarti and V. Arora,Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 014512 [2207.00980]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    S. Chen, O. Savchuk, S. Zheng, B. Chen, H. Stoecker, L. Wang et al.,Fourier-flow model generating Feynman paths,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 056001 [2211.03470]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Caselle, E

    M. Caselle, E. Cellini and A. Nada,Sampling the lattice Nambu-Goto string using Continuous Normalizing Flows,JHEP02(2024) 048 [2307.01107]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Albandea, L

    D. Albandea, L. Del Debbio, P. Hern´ andez, R. Kenway, J. Marsh Rossney and A. Ramos, Learning trivializing flows,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 676 [2302.08408]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Kreit, D

    J. Kreit, D. Schuh, K. A. Nicoli and L. Funcke,SESaMo: Symmetry-Enforcing Stochastic Modulation for Normalizing Flows,2505.19619

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    Schuh, J

    D. Schuh, J. Kreit, E. Berkowitz, L. Funcke, T. Luu, K. A. Nicoli et al.,Simulating Correlated Electrons with Symmetry-Enforced Normalizing Flows,2506.17015

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Kanwar, M

    G. Kanwar, M. S. Albergo, D. Boyda, K. Cranmer, D. C. Hackett, S. Racani` ere et al., Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 121601 [2003.06413]

    work page arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    Boyda, G

    D. Boyda, G. Kanwar, S. Racani` ere, D. J. Rezende, M. S. Albergo, K. Cranmer et al., Sampling usingSU(N)gauge equivariant flows,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 074504 [2008.05456]

    work page arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Favoni, A

    M. Favoni, A. Ipp, D. I. M¨ uller and D. Schuh,Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 032003 [2012.12901]

    work page arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Bacchio, P

    S. Bacchio, P. Kessel, S. Schaefer and L. Vaitl,Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) L051504 [2212.08469]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Singha, D

    A. Singha, D. Chakrabarti and V. Arora,Sampling U(1) gauge theory using a retrainable conditional flow-based model,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 074518 [2306.00581]. – 33 –

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    Abbott et al.,Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension,2305.02402

    R. Abbott et al.,Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension,2305.02402

    work page arXiv

  77. [77]

    Gerdes, P

    M. Gerdes, P. de Haan, R. Bondesan and M. C. N. Cheng,Continuous normalizing flows for lattice gauge theories,2410.13161

    work page arXiv

  78. [78]

    M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, S. Racani` ere, D. J. Rezende, J. M. Urban, D. Boyda et al., Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 114507 [2106.05934]

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    Finkenrath,Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model,2201.02216

    J. Finkenrath,Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model,2201.02216

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    M. S. Albergo, D. Boyda, K. Cranmer, D. C. Hackett, G. Kanwar, S. Racani` ere et al., Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 014514 [2202.11712]

    work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.