pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.07226 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-10 · ⚛️ nucl-th · astro-ph.HE· hep-ph

Renormalization-Group Invariant Parity-Doublet Model for Nuclear and Neutron-Star Matter

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 23:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th astro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords Parity-Doublet Modelrenormalization-group invariancechiral symmetrynuclear matterneutron starsvacuum fluctuationsmean-field theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

A multiplicatively renormalizable mean-field approach incorporates baryonic vacuum contributions into the Parity-Doublet Model in a renormalization-group invariant way.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The Parity-Doublet Model provides a chirally invariant description of nucleons and their parity partners. The paper develops a mean-field method to add baryonic vacuum contributions to the grand-canonical potential while preserving explicit renormalization-group invariance. This is applied to two-flavor nuclear matter to examine chiral symmetry restoration at densities and temperatures important for neutron stars. The consistent treatment shows that vacuum fluctuations have a notable impact on how the chiral condensate changes with density and temperature.

Core claim

The central claim is that a multiplicatively renormalizable mean-field approach can include baryonic vacuum contributions to the grand-canonical potential of the Parity-Doublet Model in an explicitly renormalization-group invariant form. Applied to two-flavor nuclear matter, this shows the importance of vacuum fluctuations for the evolution of the chiral condensate with density and temperature, for chosen values of m0, in the context of chiral symmetry restoration relevant to neutron stars.

What carries the argument

The multiplicatively renormalizable mean-field approach that includes baryonic vacuum contributions in an explicitly renormalization-group invariant form within the Parity-Doublet Model.

If this is right

  • The evolution of the chiral condensate with baryon density is affected by the inclusion of vacuum fluctuations.
  • The thermodynamics of symmetric and asymmetric nuclear matter at high densities and temperatures are influenced.
  • Chiral symmetry restoration occurs in a manner that accounts for vacuum effects in neutron-star relevant conditions.
  • This provides a more consistent framework for modeling the equation of state in neutron stars.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This RG-invariant treatment could be generalized to include more flavors or strange baryons for better neutron star modeling.
  • Comparisons with other effective models or lattice simulations at finite density might be facilitated by this approach.
  • Earlier Parity-Doublet Model studies may require revision if they omitted consistent vacuum fluctuation contributions.

Load-bearing premise

The approach relies on specific fixed choices of the chirally invariant baryon mass m0 together with the mean-field approximation and two-flavor truncation.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation showing that the chiral condensate evolution with density remains unchanged when vacuum fluctuations are added via this RG-invariant method compared to inconsistent treatments, or that results for the chosen m0 violate known nuclear matter saturation properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.07226 by Jochen Wambach, Lorenz von Smekal, Mattia Recchi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Phase diagrams for symmetric nuclear matter, where the heatmaps display the value of the in-medium chiral condensate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The chiral condensate at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The zero-temperature phase diagram in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Left panel: zoom-in of the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The chiral condensate in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Relative abundances of the various species in cold [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The EoS (left panel) and the squared speed of sound (right panel) of cold NS matter for the various values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Left panel: The M-R relation for evolved NS, obtained with the parameter sets discussed in the text. The shaded colored [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The thermal index Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Parity-Doublet Model (PDM) is a chirally invariant effective theory for strong-interaction matter involving nucleons and their opposite-parity partners in a parity-doubling framework. We introduce a multiplicatively renormalizable mean-field approach to include the baryonic vacuum contributions to the resulting grand-canonical potential in an explicitly renormalization-group invariant form. As an application, we evaluate the pertinent thermodynamics of two-flavor symmetric and asymmetric nuclear matter, focusing on the restoration of spontaneously broken chiral symmetry at baryon densities and temperatures relevant for the astrophysics of neutron stars. Special attention is paid to the effect of the baryonic vacuum fluctuations on the evolution of chiral condensate with baryon density and temperature for specific choices of the chirally invariant baryon mass $m_0$ to demonstrate the importance of consistently including these vacuum fluctuations in the PDM.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a multiplicatively renormalizable mean-field formulation of the Parity-Doublet Model (PDM) that incorporates baryonic vacuum contributions to the grand-canonical potential in an explicitly renormalization-group invariant manner. The authors apply the framework to two-flavor symmetric and asymmetric nuclear matter, compute the thermodynamics, and examine the restoration of chiral symmetry at baryon densities and temperatures relevant to neutron stars, with emphasis on the role of vacuum fluctuations for chosen values of the chirally invariant baryon mass m0.

Significance. If the RG-invariant treatment of vacuum terms produces a robust qualitative modification to the chiral-condensate evolution, the construction supplies a technically consistent extension of the PDM that could improve descriptions of dense matter in neutron-star contexts. The explicit multiplicative renormalizability and focus on vacuum contributions constitute a clear technical advance over standard mean-field implementations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Application to nuclear and neutron-star matter (results section)] The central claim that consistent inclusion of RG-invariant vacuum fluctuations is important for the chiral-condensate evolution rests on fixed choices of the chirally invariant mass m0 together with the mean-field and strict two-flavor approximations. No systematic variation of m0, no estimate of its uncertainty at neutron-star densities, and no test of sensitivity to strangeness degrees of freedom are reported; this leaves open whether the reported qualitative change is an artifact of those choices rather than a general feature of the renormalizable construction.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Model construction] Notation for the renormalized couplings and the explicit form of the RG-invariant vacuum term should be cross-referenced to the defining equations to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment in detail below and have made revisions to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim that consistent inclusion of RG-invariant vacuum fluctuations is important for the chiral-condensate evolution rests on fixed choices of the chirally invariant mass m0 together with the mean-field and strict two-flavor approximations. No systematic variation of m0, no estimate of its uncertainty at neutron-star densities, and no test of sensitivity to strangeness degrees of freedom are reported; this leaves open whether the reported qualitative change is an artifact of those choices rather than a general feature of the renormalizable construction.

    Authors: We agree that the results are presented for specific choices of m0 and within the two-flavor mean-field framework. The aim of this work is to establish the multiplicatively renormalizable formulation and to highlight the role of vacuum fluctuations by direct comparison for representative m0 values used in the PDM literature. The qualitative change in the condensate evolution is driven by the inclusion of the RG-invariant vacuum terms, which modify the effective potential independently of the particular m0. Nevertheless, to address the concern, we have added a new subsection discussing the dependence on m0 within the range 0.5 to 1.0 GeV and included a note on the limitations of the two-flavor approximation, with plans for future work on strange degrees of freedom. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; RG-invariant vacuum inclusion is a new construction with m0 as explicit input

full rationale

The paper presents a multiplicatively renormalizable mean-field method to incorporate baryonic vacuum contributions into the grand-canonical potential in explicitly RG-invariant form. This is applied to the Parity-Doublet Model for two-flavor matter, with the chirally invariant mass m0 treated as a fixed choice rather than a derived or fitted quantity. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-fit, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. The demonstration of vacuum fluctuation effects on the chiral condensate follows directly from the new construction evaluated at chosen m0 values, remaining self-contained against the stated mean-field and two-flavor truncation without renaming known results or forcing predictions from internal parameters.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the mean-field truncation, the two-flavor approximation, and the choice of fixed m0 values; no new particles or forces are introduced, but the vacuum inclusion scheme is the novel technical element.

free parameters (1)
  • chirally invariant baryon mass m0
    Fixed input parameter whose specific values are used to demonstrate the effect of vacuum fluctuations on the chiral condensate.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Mean-field approximation is sufficient for the thermodynamics at the densities and temperatures considered.
    Standard in effective models but limits the treatment of fluctuations.
  • domain assumption Two-flavor symmetric and asymmetric nuclear matter captures the essential physics for neutron-star applications.
    Explicitly stated focus of the application section.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5458 in / 1443 out tokens · 25351 ms · 2026-05-17T23:55:24.864303+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Massive hybrid stars within the extended three-flavor quark-meson diquark model

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Adding vector and axial-vector mesons to the extended quark-meson diquark model produces a sufficiently stiff equation of state to support hybrid stars above 2 solar masses with quark cores at central densities of at ...

  2. Kinetic Mixing and Axial Charges in the Parity-Doublet Model

    hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Kinetic mixing terms are introduced in the parity-doublet model to reproduce the empirical axial charge g_A ≈ 1.28 of the nucleon along with masses of the nucleon and N*(1535).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    mirror assignment

    representations, N1 andN 2, with chirally invariant Yukawa couplings to theO(4) vector (σ, ⃗ π) of sigma-meson and pion fields. Requiring so-called “mirror assignment” [18], where the left-handedN 2 transforms as the right-handedN 1 and vice versa underSU(2) L ×SU(2) R, it is then possible to introduce a chirally invariant fermion massm 0, common to both ...

  2. [2]

    No Vacuum Contribution

    and ˜λ0 = 1/u 0 = ln(Λ/m 0)/π2 to fixσ 0 =f π (at the reference scale) and theσ-meson (curvature) mass parameterm σ, see below. 6 D. Parameter Fixing and Best Fit We now focus on the choice of the parameters for the PDM. These are fixed both from hadron phenomenology and the saturation properties of nuclear matter. The distinctive parameter of the PDM is ...

  3. [3]

    Strong-interaction matter under extreme con- ditions

    in the mesonic potential (20), and the dimensionless parametersc 6,c 8,g ω,g ρ for the strengths of higher-order couplings and vector repulsion (m σ is allowed to vary between 400 MeV and 550 MeV, but otherwise not constrained and quoted for reference here, see text). No V acuum Contribution m0 [MeV] EB [MeV] n0 [fm−3] Esym [MeV] K∞ [MeV] σ(n0) [MeV] L[Me...

  4. [4]

    S. S. Afonin, Parity Doubling in Particle Physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A22, 4537 (2007), arXiv:0704.1639 [hep-ph]

  5. [5]

    C. E. Detar and T. Kunihiro, LinearσModel With Parity Doubling, Phys. Rev. D39, 2805 (1989)

  6. [6]

    Gell-Mann and M

    M. Gell-Mann and M. Levy, The axial vector current in beta decay, Nuovo Cim.16, 705 (1960)

  7. [7]

    B. D. Serot and J. D. Walecka, The Relativistic Nuclear Many Body Problem, Adv. Nucl. Phys.16, 1 (1986)

  8. [8]

    C. E. Detar and J. B. Kogut, The Hadronic Spectrum of the Quark Plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 399 (1987)

  9. [9]

    C. E. Detar and J. B. Kogut, Measuring the Hadronic Spectrum of the Quark Plasma, Phys. Rev. D36, 2828 (1987)

  10. [10]

    Light baryons below and above the deconfinement transition: medium effects and parity doubling

    G. Aarts, C. Allton, D. De Boni, S. Hands, B. J¨ ager, C. Praki, and J.-I. Skullerud, Light baryons below and above the deconfinement transition: medium effects and parity doubling, JHEP06, 034, arXiv:1703.09246 [hep- lat]

  11. [11]

    Marczenko, D

    M. Marczenko, D. Blaschke, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Parity Doubling and the Dense Matter Phase Dia- gram under Constraints from Multi-Messenger Astron- omy, Universe5, 180 (2019), arXiv:1905.04974 [nucl-th]

  12. [12]

    Y. K. Kong, T. Minamikawa, and M. Harada, Neutron star matter based on a parity doublet model including the a0(980) meson, Phys. Rev. C108, 055206 (2023), arXiv:2306.08140 [nucl-th]

  13. [13]

    Eser and J.-P

    J. Eser and J.-P. Blaizot, Thermodynamics of the parity- doublet model: Symmetric nuclear matter and the chiral transition, Phys. Rev. C109, 045201 (2024), arXiv:2309.06566 [nucl-th]

  14. [14]

    The hadronic SU(3) Parity Doublet Model for Dense Matter, its extension to quarks and the strange equation of state

    J. Steinheimer, S. Schramm, and H. Stocker, The hadronic SU(3) Parity Doublet Model for Dense Mat- ter, its extension to quarks and the strange equation of state, Phys. Rev. C84, 045208 (2011), arXiv:1108.2596 [hep-ph]

  15. [15]

    Minamikawa, B

    T. Minamikawa, B. Gao, T. Kojo, and M. Harada, Chiral Restoration of Nucleons in Neutron Star Matter: Studies Based on a Parity Doublet Model, Symmetry15, 745 (2023), arXiv:2302.00825 [nucl-th]

  16. [16]

    E. S. Fraga, R. da Mata, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, SU(3) parity doubling in cold neutron star matter, Phys. Rev. D108, 116003 (2023), arXiv:2309.02368 [hep-ph]

  17. [17]

    Senger (CBM), Probing dense QCD matter in the lab- oratory—The CBM experiment at FAIR, Phys

    P. Senger (CBM), Probing dense QCD matter in the lab- oratory—The CBM experiment at FAIR, Phys. Scripta 95, 074003 (2020), arXiv:2005.03321 [nucl-ex]

  18. [18]

    Adamczewski-Muschet al.(HADES), HADES and the QCD phase diagram, PoSCPOD2021, 003 (2022)

    J. Adamczewski-Muschet al.(HADES), HADES and the QCD phase diagram, PoSCPOD2021, 003 (2022)

  19. [19]

    Eser and J.-P

    J. Eser and J.-P. Blaizot, Thermodynamics of the parity- doublet model. II. Asymmetric and neutron matter, Phys. Rev. C110, 065205 (2024), arXiv:2408.01302 [nucl-th]

  20. [20]

    B. B. Brandt, V. Chelnokov, G. Endrodi, G. Marko, D. Scheid, and L. von Smekal, Renormalization group invariant mean-field model for QCD at finite isospin den- sity, Phys. Rev. D112, 054038 (2025), arXiv:2502.04025 [hep-ph]

  21. [21]

    D. Jido, Y. Nemoto, M. Oka, and A. Hosaka, Chiral sym- metry for positive and negative parity nucleons, Nucl. Phys. A671, 471 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9805306

  22. [22]

    Y.-B. Yang, J. Liang, Y.-J. Bi, Y. Chen, T. Draper, K.- F. Liu, and Z. Liu, Proton Mass Decomposition from the QCD Energy Momentum Tensor, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 212001 (2018), arXiv:1808.08677 [hep-lat]

  23. [23]

    V. D. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri, F. X. Girod, C. Lorc´ e, P. Schweitzer, and P. E. Shanahan, Colloquium: Gravi- tational form factors of the proton, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 041002 (2023), arXiv:2303.08347 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

  25. [25]

    Vacuum fluctuations and the thermodynamics of chiral models

    V. Skokov, B. Friman, E. Nakano, K. Redlich, and B. J. Schaefer, Vacuum fluctuations and the thermodynam- ics of chiral models, Phys. Rev. D82, 034029 (2010), arXiv:1005.3166 [hep-ph]

  26. [26]

    Brandes, N

    L. Brandes, N. Kaiser, and W. Weise, Fluctuations and phases in baryonic matter, Eur. Phys. J. A57, 243 (2021), arXiv:2103.06096 [nucl-th]

  27. [27]

    Chiral Mirror-Baryon-Meson Model and Nuclear Matter beyond Mean-Field

    J. Weyrich, N. Strodthoff, and L. von Smekal, Chi- ral mirror-baryon-meson model and nuclear matter be- yond mean-field approximation, Phys. Rev. C92, 015214 (2015), arXiv:1504.02697 [nucl-th]

  28. [28]

    A. B. Larionov and L. von Smekal, Effects of chiral symmetry restoration on meson and dilepton produc- tion in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C105, 034914 (2022), arXiv:2109.03556 [nucl-th]

  29. [29]

    Kim and S

    J. Kim and S. H. Lee, Masses of hadrons in the chiral symmetry restored vacuum, Phys. Rev. D105, 014014 (2022), arXiv:2109.12791 [hep-ph]

  30. [30]

    Drischler, P

    C. Drischler, P. G. Giuliani, S. Bezoui, J. Piekarewicz, and F. Viens, Bayesian mixture model approach to quan- tifying the empirical nuclear saturation point, Phys. Rev. C110, 044320 (2024), arXiv:2405.02748 [nucl-th]

  31. [31]

    J. R. Stone, N. J. Stone, and S. A. Moszkowski, Incom- pressibility in finite nuclei and nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C89, 044316 (2014), arXiv:1404.0744 [nucl-th]

  32. [32]

    The Nuclear Symmetry Energy

    M. Baldo and G. F. Burgio, The nuclear symme- try energy, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.91, 203 (2016), arXiv:1606.08838 [nucl-th]

  33. [33]

    Agadjanov, D

    A. Agadjanov, D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, and H. Wittig, Nucleon Sigma Terms with Nf=2+1 Flavors of O(a)-Improved Wil- son Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 261902 (2023), arXiv:2303.08741 [hep-lat]

  34. [34]

    Nucleon charges andσ-terms in lattice QCD,

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, J. Finkenrath, C. Iona, G. Koutsou, Y. Li, and G. Spanoudes, Nucleon charges andσ-terms in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D111, 054505 (2025), arXiv:2412.01535 [hep-lat]

  35. [35]

    High-precision determination of the pion-nucleon $\sigma$-term from Roy-Steiner equations

    M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis, and U.- G. Meißner, High-Precision Determination of the Pion- NucleonσTerm from Roy-Steiner Equations, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 092301 (2015), arXiv:1506.04142 [hep-ph]. 16

  36. [36]

    Hoferichter, J

    M. Hoferichter, J. R. de Elvira, B. Kubis, and U.- G. Meißner, On the role of isospin violation in the pion–nucleonσ-term, Phys. Lett. B843, 138001 (2023), arXiv:2305.07045 [hep-ph]

  37. [37]

    S. Owa, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, and X.- G. Wang, Chiral analysis of the nucleon mass and sigma commutator, Phys. Rev. D109, 116022 (2024), arXiv:2310.12564 [hep-ph]

  38. [38]

    In-medium chiral condensate beyond linear density approximation

    N. Kaiser, P. de Homont, and W. Weise, In-medium chiral condensate beyond linear density approximation, Phys. Rev. C77, 025204 (2008), arXiv:0711.3154 [nucl- th]

  39. [39]

    V. A. Karnaukhov and A. S. Botvina, Comment on ’The experimental liquid-vapor phase diagram of bulk nuclear matter’, J. Phys. G40, 058001 (2013)

  40. [40]

    B. K. Agrawal, J. N. De, and S. K. Samaddar, Deter- mining the density content of symmetry energy and neu- tron skin: an empirical approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 262501 (2012), arXiv:1212.0292 [nucl-th]

  41. [41]

    B. K. Agrawal, J. N. De, S. K. Samaddar, G. Colo, and A. Sulaksono, Constraining the density dependence of the symmetry energy from nuclear masses, Phys. Rev. C87, 051306 (2013), arXiv:1305.5336 [nucl-th]

  42. [42]

    Gil, Y.-M

    H. Gil, Y.-M. Kim, P. Papakonstantinou, and C. H. Hyun, Constraining the density dependence of the sym- metry energy with nuclear data and astronomical obser- vations in the Korea-IBS-Daegu-SKKU framework, Phys. Rev. C103, 034330 (2021), arXiv:2010.13354 [nucl-th]

  43. [43]

    Li, B.-J

    B.-A. Li, B.-J. Cai, W.-J. Xie, and N.-B. Zhang, Progress in Constraining Nuclear Symmetry Energy Using Neu- tron Star Observables Since GW170817, Universe7, 182 (2021), arXiv:2105.04629 [nucl-th]

  44. [44]

    F. J. Fattoyev, C. J. Horowitz, J. Piekarewicz, and G. Shen, Relativistic effective interaction for nuclei, giant resonances, and neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C82, 055803 (2010), arXiv:1008.3030 [nucl-th]

  45. [45]

    Chemical freeze-out in heavy ion collisions at large baryon densities

    S. Floerchinger and C. Wetterich, Chemical freeze-out in heavy ion collisions at large baryon densities, Nucl. Phys. A890-891, 11 (2012), arXiv:1202.1671 [nucl-th]

  46. [46]

    Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, Decoding the phase structure of QCD via par- ticle production at high energy, Nature561, 321 (2018), arXiv:1710.09425 [nucl-th]

  47. [47]

    The thermal proton yield anomaly in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC and its resolution

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, B. Friman, P. M. Lo, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, The thermal proton yield anomaly in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC and its reso- lution, Phys. Lett. B792, 304 (2019), arXiv:1808.03102 [hep-ph]

  48. [48]

    W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D101, 054032 (2020), arXiv:1909.02991 [hep-ph]

  49. [49]

    P. J. Gunkel and C. S. Fischer, Locating the critical end- point of QCD: Mesonic backcoupling effects, Phys. Rev. D104, 054022 (2021), arXiv:2106.08356 [hep-ph]

  50. [50]

    Fluctuations in the quark-meson model for QCD with isospin chemical potential

    K. Kamikado, N. Strodthoff, L. von Smekal, and J. Wambach, Fluctuations in the quark-meson model for QCD with isospin chemical potential, Phys. Lett. B718, 1044 (2013), arXiv:1207.0400 [hep-ph]

  51. [51]

    Geurts and R.-A

    F. Geurts and R.-A. Tripolt, Electromagnetic probes: Theory and experiment, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.128, 104004 (2023), arXiv:2210.01622 [hep-ph]

  52. [52]

    F. Seck, B. Friman, T. Galatyuk, H. van Hees, R. Rapp, E. Speranza, and J. Wambach, Polarization of thermal dilepton radiation, Phys. Lett. B861, 139267 (2025), arXiv:2309.03189 [nucl-th]

  53. [53]

    Wambach, Baryon-rich QCD matter, J

    J. Wambach, Baryon-rich QCD matter, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2536, 012002 (2023), arXiv:2304.14833 [hep-ph]

  54. [54]

    M. C. Milleret al., PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius fromN ICERData and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.887, L24 (2019), arXiv:1912.05705 [astro-ph.HE]

  55. [55]

    A. J. Dittmannet al., A More Precise Measurement of the Radius of PSR J0740+6620 Using Updated NICER Data, Astrophys. J.974, 295 (2024), arXiv:2406.14467 [astro-ph.HE]

  56. [56]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

  57. [57]

    Relativistic Mean-Field Theory and the High-Density Nuclear Equation of State

    H. Mueller and B. D. Serot, Relativistic mean field the- ory and the high density nuclear equation of state, Nucl. Phys. A606, 508 (1996), arXiv:nucl-th/9603037

  58. [58]

    E. S. Fraga, R. da Mata, S. Pitsinigkos, and A. Schmitt, Strange quark matter from a baryonic approach, Phys. Rev. D106, 074018 (2022), arXiv:2206.09219 [nucl-th]

  59. [59]

    Fukushima and S

    K. Fukushima and S. Minato, Speed of sound and trace anomaly in a unified treatment of the two-color diquark superfluid, the pion-condensed high-isospin matter, and the 2SC quark matter, Phys. Rev. D111, 094006 (2025), arXiv:2411.03781 [hep-ph]

  60. [60]

    Typel, G

    S. Typel, G. R¨ opke, T. Kl¨ ahn, D. Blaschke, and H. H. Wolter, HS(DD2) Neutron Matter (with electrons), Zen- odo (2018), data hosted viahttps://compose.obspm. fr/eos/2

  61. [61]

    Composition and thermodynamics of nuclear matter with light clusters

    S. Typel, G. R¨ opke, T. Kl¨ ahn, D. Blaschke, and H. H. Wolter, Composition and thermodynamics of nuclear matter with light clusters, Phys. Rev. C81, 015803 (2010), arXiv:0908.2344 [nucl-th]

  62. [62]

    Gholami, TOVExtravaganza: Python toolkit for solv- ing the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) equations and exploring neutron star properties (2025)

    H. Gholami, TOVExtravaganza: Python toolkit for solv- ing the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) equations and exploring neutron star properties (2025)

  63. [63]

    Kochankovski, G

    H. Kochankovski, G. Lioutas, S. Blacker, A. Bauswein, A. Ramos, and L. Tolos, Impact of hyperons on neutron star mergers: Gravitational waves, mass ejection, and black hole formation, Phys. Rev. D112, 023014 (2025), arXiv:2501.12905 [astro-ph.HE]

  64. [64]

    Fore and S

    B. Fore and S. Reddy, Pions in hot dense matter and their astrophysical implications, Phys. Rev. C101, 035809 (2020), arXiv:1911.02632 [astro-ph.HE]