pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.15916 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA· gr-qc· hep-ph· hep-th

Effects of New Forces on Scalar Dark Matter Solitons

Alize Sucsuzer , Mark P. Hertzberg , Michiru Uwabo-Niibo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 19:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAgr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords scalar dark matterboson starsnew forcesgalactic coressolitonsmediators
0
0 comments X

The pith

A new force between scalar dark matter particles changes the density-radius relation of boson star cores.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates the impact of an additional long-range force on light bosonic dark matter, mediated by a light but massive particle. The force supplements gravity and is intended to modify small-scale galactic structures without impacting cosmology. The authors numerically compute the equilibrium profiles of gravitationally bound scalar solitons, known as boson stars, including this new interaction. They demonstrate that the force modifies the relationship between the core's density and its radius, which could help align predictions with astronomical observations of galactic centers. However, when the strength of the new force is similar to gravity, the improvement in fitting data is only modest, and they also explore scenarios with several mediators.

Core claim

We show that this new force alters the relation between core density and core radius in a way that can provide improvement in fitting data to observed galactic cores, but for couplings of order the gravitational strength, the improvement is only modest.

What carries the argument

Numerical solutions for the radial profiles of scalar field solitons in the presence of gravity and the new mediated force.

If this is right

  • The core density and radius relation deviates from the gravity-only case.
  • Fitting to observed galactic cores can improve modestly with the new force.
  • Multiple mediators provide additional flexibility in modeling.
  • The modifications are limited to small galactic scales by the mediator mass.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This model could be tested with future high-resolution observations of dwarf galaxy cores.
  • Similar new forces might apply to other dark matter candidates beyond scalars.
  • It opens the possibility of constraining dark sector physics using galactic structure data.

Load-bearing premise

Boson stars serve as galactic cores and the mediator affects small scales but not cosmology.

What would settle it

Observations of galactic cores that exactly match the density-radius relation expected from gravity alone without any new force.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.15916 by Alize Sucsuzer, Mark P. Hertzberg, Michiru Uwabo-Niibo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Representative plots of fields ˜f, ϕ˜N , χ˜ versus dimensionless radius ˜r evaluated at β ′ = 0.287 ∼ 0.3, β ′ = 1.278 ∼ 1.3 and β ′ = 5.683 ∼ 5.7. In the left (right) column, we have set the coupling of the new force to be gχ = 1 (gχ = 2). 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Top: Core density ρc (in units of m4 χ/(G m2 ϕ )) of the soliton versus core radius Rc (in units of m−1 χ ). Bottom: Rescaled core density ρc R4 c (in units of (G m2 ϕ ) −1 ) of the soliton versus core radius Rc (in units of m−1 χ ). Small Rc ≪ m−1 χ and large Rc ≫ m−1 χ asymptotes are given in orange and red lines, respectively. Also a fit function of the form in Eq. (54) is given in the bottom plot. In t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: First two rows: Representative plots of fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top: Core density ρc (in units of m4 χ1 /(G m2 ϕ )) of the soliton versus core radius Rc (in units of m−1 χ1 ) in the presence of two mediators χ1 and χ2. Bottom: Rescaled core density ρc R4 c (in units of (G m2 ϕ ) −1 ) of the soliton versus core radius Rc (in units of m−1 χ ). Small Rc ≪ m−1 χ2 , intermediate m−1 χ2 ≪ Rc ≪ m−1 χ1 and large Rc ≫ m−1 χ1 asymptotes are given in green, orange and red lines, … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

New long range forces acting on ordinary matter are highly constrained. However it is possible such forces act on dark matter, as it is less constrained observationally. In this work, we consider dark matter to be made of light bosons, such as axions. We introduce a mediator that communicates a new force between dark matter particles, in addition to gravity. The mediator is taken to be light, but not massless, so that it can affect small scale galactic behavior, but not current cosmological behavior. As a concrete application of this idea, we analyze the effects on scalar dark matter solitons bound by gravitation, i.e., boson stars, which have been claimed to potentially provide cores of galaxies. We numerically determine the soliton's profiles in the presence of this new force. We also extend the analysis to multiple mediators. We show that this new force alters the relation between core density and core radius in a way that can provide improvement in fitting data to observed galactic cores, but for couplings of order the gravitational strength, the improvement is only modest.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines the effects of a new long-range force, mediated by a light but massive particle, acting on scalar dark matter modeled as axion-like bosons. The authors numerically solve the modified field equations for boson-star solitons (claimed as potential galactic cores) and show that the additional force shifts the core density-radius relation. For mediator couplings of gravitational strength, this yields a modest improvement in matching observed galactic core properties; the analysis is extended to multiple mediators.

Significance. If the numerical profiles are robust, the work provides a concrete, calculable example of how dark-sector forces can influence galactic-scale structure while remaining compatible with cosmology due to the mediator's mass. The qualified conclusion (modest effect at natural couplings) and the extension to multiple mediators are strengths. The approach is falsifiable in principle via improved core observations and adds to the literature on scalar DM solitons.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Numerical solutions): the soliton profiles are obtained by solving the coupled equations, yet no convergence tests, grid-resolution studies, or error estimates on the extracted core density and radius are reported. This leaves the quantitative size of the density-radius shift (and thus the claimed modest improvement) without the error bars needed to assess its robustness against numerical artifacts.
  2. [§4] §4 (Comparison to galactic cores): the improvement in fitting observed cores is stated qualitatively for couplings of order gravitational strength, without reported chi-squared values, direct overlay plots with data uncertainties, or baseline gravity-only runs shown side-by-side. Because the central claim concerns an improvement in data fitting, this omission makes the magnitude of the effect hard to evaluate precisely.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and §2: the mediator mass range that separates galactic from cosmological scales is introduced but not given explicit numerical bounds or a derivation showing why it evades current cosmological constraints.
  2. [§3] Notation: the definition of the core radius (e.g., where density drops to 1/e of central value) should be stated explicitly when the density-radius relation is first plotted or tabulated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript, positive overall assessment, and recommendation for minor revision. We address the major comments point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements to the numerical validation and data comparison sections.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Numerical solutions): the soliton profiles are obtained by solving the coupled equations, yet no convergence tests, grid-resolution studies, or error estimates on the extracted core density and radius are reported. This leaves the quantitative size of the density-radius shift (and thus the claimed modest improvement) without the error bars needed to assess its robustness against numerical artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that explicit convergence tests and error estimates would improve the robustness assessment of our results. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in §3 describing the numerical setup, including grid-resolution studies, domain-size convergence checks, and estimated uncertainties on the extracted core density and radius. These additions will provide quantitative support for the reported shifts in the density-radius relation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Comparison to galactic cores): the improvement in fitting observed cores is stated qualitatively for couplings of order gravitational strength, without reported chi-squared values, direct overlay plots with data uncertainties, or baseline gravity-only runs shown side-by-side. Because the central claim concerns an improvement in data fitting, this omission makes the magnitude of the effect hard to evaluate precisely.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of more quantitative and visual comparisons. In the revision we will add side-by-side plots of the gravity-only baseline and the new-force cases, overlaid with observed galactic core data including reported uncertainties. While a full chi-squared statistical analysis lies somewhat outside the scope of this primarily theoretical work, we will include a quantitative metric such as the reduction in root-mean-square residuals relative to the observations to better characterize the modest improvement at gravitational-strength couplings. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is a forward numerical computation from model inputs

full rationale

The paper introduces a mediator with mass and coupling as free parameters, solves the modified Einstein-Klein-Gordon equations numerically to obtain soliton density profiles, and extracts the resulting core density-radius relation directly from those profiles. No step reduces the output to a fit of the galactic data, a self-definition, or a load-bearing self-citation; the modest improvement claim is presented as a qualified consequence of the computed profiles rather than an input. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the stated field equations and assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a light mediator whose mass and coupling are chosen by hand to affect galactic scales, plus the assumption that scalar solitons form galactic cores.

free parameters (2)
  • mediator mass
    Chosen small enough to influence small-scale galactic structure but large enough to avoid cosmological constraints.
  • coupling strength
    Set to order of gravitational strength for the modest-improvement case.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Scalar dark matter consists of light bosons that form gravitationally bound solitons capable of serving as galactic cores.
    Invoked in the abstract as the starting point for the soliton analysis.
invented entities (1)
  • light mediator particle no independent evidence
    purpose: Communicates a new long-range force between dark matter bosons
    Postulated to modify soliton structure; no independent evidence supplied beyond the model itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5497 in / 1428 out tokens · 63368 ms · 2026-05-17T19:57:47.391077+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Observational evidence for selfinteracting cold dark mat- ter,

    D. N. Spergel and P. J. Steinhardt, “Observational evidence for selfinteracting cold dark mat- ter,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 84, pp. 3760–3763, 2000

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Colliding clusters and dark matter self-interactions,

    F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, M. T. Frandsen, and S. Sarkar, “Colliding clusters and dark matter self-interactions,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 437, no. 3, pp. 2865–2881, 2014

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure,

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, “Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure,”Phys. Rept., vol. 730, pp. 1–57, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Direct constraints on the dark matter self-interaction cross-section from the merging galaxy cluster 1E0657-56,

    M. Markevitch, A. H. Gonzalez, D. Clowe, A. Vikhlinin, L. David, W. Forman, C. Jones, S. Murray, and W. Tucker, “Direct constraints on the dark matter self-interaction cross-section from the merging galaxy cluster 1E0657-56,”Astrophys. J., vol. 606, pp. 819–824, 2004

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    A New Light Boson?

    S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?”Phys.Rev.Lett., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 223–226, 1978

    work page 1978

  6. [6]

    Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,

    F. Wilczek, “Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys.Rev.Lett., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 279–282, 1978

    work page 1978

  7. [7]

    Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, “Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,”Phys.Lett.B, vol. 120, no. 1-3, pp. 127–132, jan 1983

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, “A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,”Phys.Lett.B, vol. 120, no. 1-3, pp. 133–136, jan 1983

    work page 1983

  9. [9]

    The Not So Harmless Axion,

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, “The Not So Harmless Axion,”Phys.Lett.B, vol. 120, no. 1-3, pp. 137–141, jan 1983

    work page 1983

  10. [10]

    Cold and fuzzy dark matter,

    W. Hu, R. Barkana, and A. Gruzinov, “Cold and fuzzy dark matter,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 85, pp. 1158–1161, 2000

    work page 2000

  11. [11]

    Contrasting Galaxy Formation from Quantum Wave Dark Matter,ψDM, with ΛCDM, using Planck and Hubble Data,

    H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh, T. Broadhurst, and K.-W. Huang, “Contrasting Galaxy Formation from Quantum Wave Dark Matter,ψDM, with ΛCDM, using Planck and Hubble Data,” Astrophys. J., vol. 818, no. 1, p. 89, 2016

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Not so fuzzy: excluding fdm with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultra-faint dwarf galaxies,

    N. Dalal and A. Kravtsov, “Not so fuzzy: excluding fdm with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultra-faint dwarf galaxies,” 2022

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    First constraints on fuzzy dark matter from lyman-alpha forest data and hydrodynamical simulations,

    V. Irˇ s iˇ c, M. Viel, M. G. Haehnelt, J. S. Bolton, and G. D. Becker, “First constraints on fuzzy dark matter from lyman-alpha forest data and hydrodynamical simulations,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 119, no. 3, jul 2017. 17

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Constrain- ing the mass of light bosonic dark matter using SDSS lyman-alpha forest,

    E. Armengaud, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` e che, D. J. E. Marsh, and J. Baur, “Constrain- ing the mass of light bosonic dark matter using SDSS lyman-alpha forest,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 471, no. 4, pp. 4606–4614, jul 2017

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    The diversity of core–halo structure in the fuzzy dark matter model,

    H. Y. J. Chan, E. G. M. Ferreira, S. May, K. Hayashi, and M. Chiba, “The diversity of core–halo structure in the fuzzy dark matter model,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 511, no. 1, pp. 943–952, jan 2022

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    A lensed radio jet at milli-arcsecond resolution – II. constraints on fuzzy dark matter from an extended gravitational arc,

    D. M. Powell, S. Vegetti, J. P. McKean, S. D. M. White, E. G. M. Ferreira, S. May, and C. Spingola, “A lensed radio jet at milli-arcsecond resolution – II. constraints on fuzzy dark matter from an extended gravitational arc,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety: Letters, vol. 524, no. 1, pp. L84–L88, jun 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Quantum tunneling of ultralight dark matter out of satellite galaxies,

    M. P. Hertzberg and A. Loeb, “Quantum tunneling of ultralight dark matter out of satellite galaxies,”JCAP, vol. 02, p. 059, 2023

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Axions In String Theory,

    P. Svrˇ cek and E. Witten, “Axions In String Theory,”JHEP, vol. 06, no. 6, p. 051, jul 2006

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    Cosmological simulations of two-component wave dark matter,

    H. Huang, H.-Y. Schive, and T. Chiueh, “Cosmological simulations of two-component wave dark matter,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 522, no. 1, pp. 515–534, apr 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Nested solitons in two-field fuzzy dark matter,

    H. N. Luu, P. Mocz, M. Vogelsberger, S. May, J. Borrow, S. H. H. Tye, and T. Broadhurst, “Nested solitons in two-field fuzzy dark matter,” 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Multifield ultralight dark matter,

    M. Gosenca, A. Eberhardt, Y. Wang, B. Eggemeier, E. Kendall, J. L. Zagorac, and R. Easther, “Multifield ultralight dark matter,”Physical Review D, vol. 107, no. 8, apr 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Simulations of multifield ultralight ax- ionlike dark matter,

    N. Glennon, N. Musoke, and C. Prescod-Weinstein, “Simulations of multifield ultralight ax- ionlike dark matter,”Physical Review D, vol. 107, no. 6, mar 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Kinetic relaxation and bose-star formation in multicomponent dark matter- i,

    M. Jain, M. A. Amin, J. Thomas, and W. Wanichwecharungruang, “Kinetic relaxation and bose-star formation in multicomponent dark matter- i,” 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Galactic condensates composed of multiple axion species,

    J. Eby, M. Leembruggen, L. Street, P. Suranyi, and L. Wijewardhana, “Galactic condensates composed of multiple axion species,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2020, no. 10, pp. 020–020, oct 2020

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Small-scale structure in vector dark matter,

    M. A. Amin, M. Jain, R. Karur, and P. Mocz, “Small-scale structure in vector dark matter,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2022, no. 08, p. 014, aug 2022

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Core and halo properties in multi-field wave dark matter,

    F. van Dissel, M. P. Hertzberg, and J. Shapiro, “Core and halo properties in multi-field wave dark matter,”JCAP, vol. 04, p. 077, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Two-scalar bose-einstein condensates: from stars to galaxies,

    H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha, C. Sun, J. Swaim, and D. Vagie, “Two-scalar bose-einstein condensates: from stars to galaxies,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2021, no. 10, p. 028, oct 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Novel structures and collapse of solitons in nonminimally gravi- tating dark matter halos,

    J. Chen and H.-Y. Zhang, “Novel structures and collapse of solitons in nonminimally gravi- tating dark matter halos,”JCAP, vol. 10, p. 005, 2024. 18

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Phenomenology of wavelike vector dark matter nonminimally cou- pled to gravity,

    H.-Y. Zhang and S. Ling, “Phenomenology of wavelike vector dark matter nonminimally cou- pled to gravity,”JCAP, vol. 07, p. 055, 2023

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self-gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates with short-range interactions: I. Analytical results,

    P.-H. Chavanis, “Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self-gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates with short-range interactions: I. Analytical results,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 84, p. 043531, 2011

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self-gravitating Bose- Einstein condensates with short-range interactions: II. Numerical results,

    P. H. Chavanis and L. Delfini, “Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self-gravitating Bose- Einstein condensates with short-range interactions: II. Numerical results,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 84, p. 043532, 2011

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    Dynamical boson stars,

    S. L. Liebling and C. Palenzuela, “Dynamical boson stars,”Living Rev. Rel., vol. 26, no. 1, p. 1, 2023

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Analysis of Dark Matter Axion Clumps with Spherical Symmetry,

    E. D. Schiappacasse and M. P. Hertzberg, “Analysis of Dark Matter Axion Clumps with Spherical Symmetry,”JCAP, vol. 01, p. 037, 2018, [Erratum: JCAP 03, E01 (2018)]

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Dilute and dense axion stars,

    L. Visinelli, S. Baum, J. Redondo, K. Freese, and F. Wilczek, “Dilute and dense axion stars,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 777, pp. 64–72, 2018

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Do Dark Matter Axions Form a Condensate with Long-Range Correlation?

    A. H. Guth, M. P. Hertzberg, and C. Prescod-Weinstein, “Do Dark Matter Axions Form a Condensate with Long-Range Correlation?”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 92, no. 10, p. 103513, 2015

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Dark Matter Axion Clump Resonance of Photons,

    M. P. Hertzberg and E. D. Schiappacasse, “Dark Matter Axion Clump Resonance of Photons,” JCAP, vol. 11, p. 004, 2018

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Merger of Dark Matter Axion Clumps and Resonant Photon Emission,

    M. P. Hertzberg, Y. Li, and E. D. Schiappacasse, “Merger of Dark Matter Axion Clumps and Resonant Photon Emission,”JCAP, vol. 07, p. 067, 2020

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Unified view of scalar and vector dark matter solitons,

    H.-Y. Zhang, “Unified view of scalar and vector dark matter solitons,”JHEP, vol. 04, p. 174, 2025

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Bose-Einstein Condensation of Dark Matter Axions,

    P. Sikivie and Q. Yang, “Bose-Einstein Condensation of Dark Matter Axions,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 103, p. 111301, 2009

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Quantum and Classical Behavior in Interacting Bosonic Systems,

    M. P. Hertzberg, “Quantum and Classical Behavior in Interacting Bosonic Systems,”JCAP, vol. 11, p. 037, 2016

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Classicality and Quantum Break-Time for Cosmic Axions,

    G. Dvali and S. Zell, “Classicality and Quantum Break-Time for Cosmic Axions,”JCAP, vol. 07, p. 064, 2018

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Gravitational Decoherence of Dark Matter,

    I. Allali and M. P. Hertzberg, “Gravitational Decoherence of Dark Matter,”JCAP, vol. 07, p. 056, 2020

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Decoherence from General Relativity,

    I. J. Allali and M. P. Hertzberg, “Decoherence from General Relativity,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 103, no. 10, p. 104053, 2021

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    General Relativistic Decoherence with Applications to Dark Matter Detection,

    I. Allali and M. P. Hertzberg, “General Relativistic Decoherence with Applications to Dark Matter Detection,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 127, no. 3, p. 031301, 2021

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    When quantum corrections alter the predictions of classical field theory for scalar field dark matter,

    A. Eberhardt, M. Kopp, and T. Abel, “When quantum corrections alter the predictions of classical field theory for scalar field dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 106, no. 10, p. 103002, 2022. 19

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Quantum description of wave dark matter,

    D. Y. Cheong, N. L. Rodd, and L.-T. Wang, “Quantum description of wave dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 1, p. 015028, 2025

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Simulations of solitonic core mergers in ultra- light axion dark matter cosmologies,

    B. Schwabe, J. C. Niemeyer, and J. F. Engels, “Simulations of solitonic core mergers in ultra- light axion dark matter cosmologies,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 94, no. 4, p. 043513, 2016

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Understanding the core-halo relation of quantum wave dark matter from 3d simula- tions,

    H.-Y. Schive, M.-H. Liao, T.-P. Woo, S.-K. Wong, T. Chiueh, T. Broadhurst, and W.-Y. P. Hwang, “Understanding the core-halo relation of quantum wave dark matter from 3d simula- tions,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 113, no. 26, dec 2014

    work page 2014

  49. [49]

    Galactic rotation curves versus ultralight dark matter: Implications of the soliton-host halo relation,

    N. Bar, D. Blas, K. Blum, and S. Sibiryakov, “Galactic rotation curves versus ultralight dark matter: Implications of the soliton-host halo relation,”Physical Review D, vol. 98, no. 8, oct 2018

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Oscillations and random walk of the soliton core in a fuzzy dark matter halo,

    X. Li, L. Hui, and T. D. Yavetz, “Oscillations and random walk of the soliton core in a fuzzy dark matter halo,”Physical Review D, vol. 103, no. 2, jan 2021

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Formation and mass growth of axion stars in axion mini- clusters,

    B. Eggemeier and J. C. Niemeyer, “Formation and mass growth of axion stars in axion mini- clusters,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 100, no. 6, p. 063528, 2019

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    New insights into the formation and growth of boson stars in dark matter halos,

    J. Chen, X. Du, E. W. Lentz, D. J. E. Marsh, and J. C. Niemeyer, “New insights into the formation and growth of boson stars in dark matter halos,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 104, no. 8, p. 083022, 2021

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Gravitational bose-einstein condensation in the kinetic regime,

    D. Levkov, A. Panin, and I. Tkachev, “Gravitational bose-einstein condensation in the kinetic regime,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 121, no. 15, oct 2018

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Self-similar growth of bose stars,

    A. S. Dmitriev, D. G. Levkov, A. G. Panin, and I. I. Tkachev, “Self-similar growth of bose stars,” 2024

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Evidence against cuspy dark matter haloes in large galaxies,

    D. C. Rodrigues, A. del Popolo, V. Marra, and P. L. C. de Oliveira, “Evidence against cuspy dark matter haloes in large galaxies,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 470, no. 2, pp. 2410–2426, jul 2017

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Can Light Dark Matter Solve the Core-Cusp Problem?

    H. Deng, M. P. Hertzberg, M. H. Namjoo, and A. Masoumi, “Can Light Dark Matter Solve the Core-Cusp Problem?”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 98, no. 2, p. 023513, 2018

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Bose-Einstein condensation of dark matter solves the core/cusp problem,

    T. Harko, “Bose-Einstein condensation of dark matter solves the core/cusp problem,”JCAP, vol. 05, p. 022, 2011

    work page 2011

  58. [58]

    Flat Central Density Profile and Constant DM Surface Density in Galaxies from Scalar Field Dark Matter,

    V. H. Robles and T. Matos, “Flat Central Density Profile and Constant DM Surface Density in Galaxies from Scalar Field Dark Matter,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 422, pp. 282–289, 2012

    work page 2012

  59. [59]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys.Rev.Lett., vol. 38, no. 25, pp. 1440–1443, 1977

    work page 1977

  60. [60]

    Relativistic Corrections to Nonrelativistic Effective Field Theories,

    M. H. Namjoo, A. H. Guth, and D. I. Kaiser, “Relativistic Corrections to Nonrelativistic Effective Field Theories,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 98, no. 1, p. 016011, 2018. 20

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    Beyond Schr¨ odinger- Poisson: nonrelativistic effective field theory for scalar dark matter,

    B. Salehian, H.-Y. Zhang, M. A. Amin, D. I. Kaiser, and M. H. Namjoo, “Beyond Schr¨ odinger- Poisson: nonrelativistic effective field theory for scalar dark matter,”JHEP, vol. 09, p. 050, 2021

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Cosmological Non-Linearities as an Effective Fluid,

    D. Baumann, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore, and M. Zaldarriaga, “Cosmological Non-Linearities as an Effective Fluid,”JCAP, vol. 07, p. 051, 2012

    work page 2012

  63. [63]

    The Effective Field Theory of Cosmo- logical Large Scale Structures,

    J. J. M. Carrasco, M. P. Hertzberg, and L. Senatore, “The Effective Field Theory of Cosmo- logical Large Scale Structures,”JHEP, vol. 09, p. 082, 2012

    work page 2012

  64. [64]

    Effective field theory of dark matter and structure formation: Semianalytical results,

    M. P. Hertzberg, “Effective field theory of dark matter and structure formation: Semianalytical results,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 89, no. 4, p. 043521, 2014. 21

    work page 2014