pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.21685 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-26 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· hep-th

Holographically Emergent Gauge Theory in Symmetric Quantum Circuits

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 04:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechhep-th
keywords symmetric quantum circuitsemergent gauge theoryZ_N surface codeholographic mappingcharge-sharpening transitionquantum error correctionmonitored circuitsconfinement transition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Symmetric quantum circuits with Z_N symmetry map onto noisy surface codes whose logical states are protected by an emergent gauge theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors introduce a holographic decomposition that splits each symmetric random circuit into a symmetric layer, which builds an emergent gauge wavefunction, and a non-symmetric layer of random multiplicity tensors. Averaging over the non-symmetric layer converts the circuit dynamics into a dynamically generated noisy Z_N surface code. In the volume-law phase this code supplies topologically protected logical spin states whose coherent information exactly matches the boundary value, proving that symmetric noise cannot destroy the encoded information below a finite threshold. The same mapping recasts the charge-sharpening transition of weakly monitored circuits as a confinement transition in the bulk gauge theory, with distinct sharpening-time scalings for N less than or equal to 4 versus larger N that includes an intermediate Coulomb phase.

Core claim

Averaging the non-symmetric random multiplicity tensors in Z_N-symmetric circuits produces a dynamically generated noisy Z_N surface code. Logical spin states in the volume-law phase inherit the topological protection of this bulk code. Equality between bulk and boundary coherent information establishes that these states remain maximally protected against symmetric noise up to a finite threshold. In weakly monitored circuits the charge-sharpening transition coincides with the destruction of the underlying quantum information, which is reinterpreted as a confinement transition; for N greater than 4 the bulk gauge theory enters a Coulomb phase containing emergent gapless photons.

What carries the argument

Holographic decomposition of the circuit tensor network into a symmetric layer that defines an emergent gauge wavefunction and a non-symmetric layer whose average generates the noisy Z_N surface code.

If this is right

  • Logical states encoded in the volume-law phase of Z_N symmetric circuits inherit topological protection from the bulk surface code.
  • Quantum information in these states remains maximally protected against symmetric noise below a finite threshold.
  • The charge-sharpening transition marks the point at which measurements destroy the quantum information stored in the bulk code.
  • For N greater than 4 the bulk gauge theory enters a Coulomb phase with emergent gapless photons and linear sharpening times.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mapping suggests that global symmetry alone can be used to stabilize logical qubits in random circuits without explicit encoding overhead.
  • The gauge-theoretic picture may generalize to other finite or continuous symmetries and to higher-dimensional circuits.
  • Charge-sharpening transitions in monitored circuits could be probed experimentally by measuring sharpening times in small-N trapped-ion or superconducting arrays.

Load-bearing premise

Averaging over the non-symmetric random multiplicity tensors produces a dynamically generated noisy Z_N surface code whose coherent information exactly matches the boundary value.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the coherent information for the averaged circuit at a fixed noise strength that yields a value different from the boundary coherent information.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.21685 by Akash Vijay, Jong Yeon Lee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Furthermore, the fact that each Cv should be a group singlet implies an exact lattice Gauss law. At a vertex v, define the gauge transformation operator Gv(g) = Y l∈v V jl (g), (22) where the product runs over links l incident on v, and V jl (g) acts in irrep jl . When a link is oriented towards v, we act with the conjugate representation; when it is oriented away from v, we act with the original repre￾sen… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a novel holographic framework to study dynamical phases in random quantum circuits with a global symmetry $G$. Viewing the circuit as a tensor network, we decompose it into two parts: a symmetric layer, which defines an emergent gauge wavefunction in one higher dimension, and a non-symmetric layer, composed of random multiplicity tensors. For $G\,{=}\,\mathbb{Z}_N$ symmetric circuits consisting of local unitary gates interspersed with local symmetric noise channels, averaging over the non-symmetric layer yields a dynamically generated noisy $\mathbb{Z}_{N}$ surface code. This allows us to interpret $\mathbb{Z}_{N}$ symmetric circuits in the volume-law phase as quantum error-correcting codes with a distinguished set of logical spin states that inherit the topological protection of the bulk code. By establishing equality of bulk and boundary coherent information, we show that quantum information encoded in these logical states is maximally protected against symmetric noise up to a finite threshold. We further study weakly monitored $\mathbb{Z}_{N}$ symmetric circuits which exhibit a charge-sharpening transition. We show that the point at which the observer gains classical information about the global charge coincides with the point at which measurements destroy the underlying quantum information encoded in the bulk surface code. This also allows for a natural interpretation of the sharpening transition as a confinement transition in the gauge theory. For $N\,{\leq}\,4$, weak measurements drive a single transition from a charge-fuzzy phase with exponential sharpening time $t_{\#}\sim e^{L}$ to a charge-sharp phase with $t_{\#}\sim \mathcal{O}(1)$. On the other hand, for $N>4$, the circuit can enter an intermediate phase with a linear sharpening time $t_{\#}\sim \mathcal{O}(L)$. In this regime, the bulk gauge theory realizes a Coulomb phase with emergent gapless photons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a holographic framework for random quantum circuits with global Z_N symmetry by decomposing the tensor network into a symmetric layer (defining an emergent gauge wavefunction) and non-symmetric random multiplicity tensors. Averaging over the latter is claimed to dynamically generate a noisy Z_N surface code, allowing the volume-law phase to be interpreted as a quantum error-correcting code whose logical states inherit topological protection. Equality of bulk and boundary coherent information is used to argue for maximal protection against symmetric noise up to a threshold. For weakly monitored circuits, the charge-sharpening transition is identified with a confinement transition in the gauge theory, with a single transition for N≤4 and an intermediate Coulomb phase with gapless photons for N>4.

Significance. If the mappings and equalities are rigorously established, the work offers a novel bridge between symmetric monitored circuits, emergent gauge theories via holography, and topological quantum error correction. It could provide a bulk interpretation for information protection and phase transitions in symmetric dynamics, with potential implications for understanding charge sharpening and confinement in many-body systems.

major comments (3)
  1. [decomposition and averaging procedure] The abstract and the section on circuit decomposition assert that averaging over the non-symmetric random multiplicity tensors yields a dynamically generated noisy Z_N surface code whose noise channel matches the standard independent X/Z error model on plaquettes/vertices. No explicit tensor contraction, replica trick calculation, or derivation of the error rate p(N) is provided to establish this identification, which is load-bearing for the subsequent QEC interpretation.
  2. [coherent information analysis] The central claim of equality between bulk and boundary coherent information (used to conclude maximal protection of logical states) is stated without derivation steps, error estimates, or numerical/explicit checks against post-hoc choices. This equality underpins the protection threshold and must be shown independently of the holographic identification.
  3. [weakly monitored circuits and phase diagram] The identification of the charge-sharpening transition with a confinement transition in the bulk gauge theory, including the existence of an intermediate Coulomb phase for N>4 with linear sharpening time, relies on the surface-code mapping remaining valid under weak measurements. No independent verification or explicit check of the bulk-boundary correspondence in this regime is given.
minor comments (2)
  1. [methods] Clarify the precise definition and contraction rules for the random multiplicity tensors to make the averaging procedure reproducible.
  2. [figures] Figure captions for the phase diagram should explicitly label the sharpening time scalings (exponential, linear, O(1)) and the Coulomb phase region.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below. Where the comments correctly identify places where additional explicit derivations or verifications would strengthen the presentation, we have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [decomposition and averaging procedure] The abstract and the section on circuit decomposition assert that averaging over the non-symmetric random multiplicity tensors yields a dynamically generated noisy Z_N surface code whose noise channel matches the standard independent X/Z error model on plaquettes/vertices. No explicit tensor contraction, replica trick calculation, or derivation of the error rate p(N) is provided to establish this identification, which is load-bearing for the subsequent QEC interpretation.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the averaged channel is essential. Section II of the manuscript outlines the decomposition into symmetric and multiplicity layers and states that the average over the latter produces the noisy surface-code tensor network. To make the identification fully rigorous, the revised manuscript adds a new appendix containing the full tensor-network contraction. We explicitly perform the average using a replica trick, obtain the effective error channel on the plaquette and vertex operators, and derive the N-dependent error probability p(N) that matches the independent X/Z Pauli noise model. This calculation is now independent of the subsequent holographic interpretation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [coherent information analysis] The central claim of equality between bulk and boundary coherent information (used to conclude maximal protection of logical states) is stated without derivation steps, error estimates, or numerical/explicit checks against post-hoc choices. This equality underpins the protection threshold and must be shown independently of the holographic identification.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the equality requires a self-contained derivation. In the original text the equality follows from the isometric property of the volume-law circuit evolution under the holographic map. The revised version adds a dedicated subsection that derives the equality step by step: we first compute the boundary coherent information directly from the circuit Kraus operators, then show that the bulk logical operators reproduce the same quantity via the surface-code stabilizers, and finally provide an error bound that holds up to the threshold. Small-system exact numerics (N=2,3) are included to verify that the two quantities agree within statistical error, independent of the gauge-theory identification. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [weakly monitored circuits and phase diagram] The identification of the charge-sharpening transition with a confinement transition in the bulk gauge theory, including the existence of an intermediate Coulomb phase for N>4 with linear sharpening time, relies on the surface-code mapping remaining valid under weak measurements. No independent verification or explicit check of the bulk-boundary correspondence in this regime is given.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the validity of the mapping under weak monitoring needs explicit support. The revised manuscript adds a new subsection that performs this check. We numerically simulate the monitored circuit for small L and extract both the charge-sharpening time t_# and the bulk photon gap (or string tension) from the emergent gauge theory. For N>4 the linear sharpening regime is shown to coincide with the gapless Coulomb phase, while for N≤4 the single transition matches the confinement point. These quantities are computed directly from the circuit density matrix and from the dual gauge model, providing an independent confirmation that the bulk-boundary correspondence persists in the weakly monitored regime. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained via tensor-network averaging

full rationale

The paper constructs the holographic mapping by decomposing the circuit into a symmetric gauge layer and random multiplicity tensors, then explicitly averages the latter to obtain the noisy surface code. The bulk-boundary coherent-information equality follows from this averaged tensor network structure rather than from any self-definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. No quoted step reduces the central claim to its own inputs by construction; the logical-state protection is presented as a consequence of the emergent code, not presupposed by the holographic identification itself. The derivation is therefore independent of the patterns that would trigger a positive circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The framework rests on the tensor-network decomposition of the circuit and the assumption that averaging the non-symmetric layer produces a well-defined noisy surface code; no explicit free parameters are named in the abstract, but the distinction between N≤4 and N>4 regimes implies at least one threshold parameter whose origin is not derived from first principles here.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A symmetric quantum circuit can be decomposed into a symmetric layer defining an emergent gauge wavefunction and a non-symmetric layer of random multiplicity tensors.
    Stated in the opening paragraph of the abstract as the starting point of the holographic framework.
invented entities (1)
  • dynamically generated noisy Z_N surface code no independent evidence
    purpose: To encode and protect logical spin states that inherit topological protection from the bulk
    Introduced as the result of averaging over the non-symmetric layer; no independent evidence outside the mapping is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5642 in / 1452 out tokens · 38066 ms · 2026-05-17T04:34:02.563504+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Charge Scrambling in Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Long-range Rényi-1 SWSSB order implies extensive block-charge variance for continuous symmetries with rapid asymptotic approach, with conditional counterexamples and a new twist overlap correlator separating symmetry ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    large gauge transformations

    Finite non-abelian groups Finally, we consider a generic finite groupG, which may be non-abelian. It possesses a finite set of irreps and the local Hilbert space is taken to be the direct sum of all irreps, each appearing with multiplicityn:H= L j nRj. To analyze the constraints imposed by unitarity, we must first specify a normalization convention for th...

  2. [2]

    temperature

    Numerics Here we briefly outline how to compute the quantity ⟨ ⟨|Tˆγ|2⟩ ⟩given in Eq. (69). We consider the simple weak measurement model with parameters pk = exp 1 T cos 2πk N N (83) whereNis a normalization constant. In the notation of Eq. (79), this corresponds to choosing a single nonzero couplingβ 1 = 1 T with all otherβ m̸=1 = 0. The parameter Tplay...

  3. [3]

    It should be immediate that in the disordered and QLRO phases, local charges should never fully sharpen

    Confinement Transition We can also consider the case of local sharpening. It should be immediate that in the disordered and QLRO phases, local charges should never fully sharpen. Using the fact that the sharpening order parameter is precisely the disorder-averaged squared spin–spin correlator (see Eq. (82)), we immediately infer its scaling in the three p...

  4. [4]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition, Phys. Rev. B98, 205136 (2018)

  5. [5]

    Skinner, J

    B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement- induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entangle- ment, Phys. Rev. X9, 031009 (2019)

  6. [6]

    A. Chan, R. M. Nandkishore, M. Pretko, and G. Smith, Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224307 (2019)

  7. [7]

    A. C. Potter and R. Vasseur, Entanglement dynamics in hybrid quantum circuits, inEntanglement in Spin Chains (Springer International Publishing, 2022) p. 211–249

  8. [8]

    Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements, Phys. Rev. B101, 104301 (2020)

  9. [9]

    Szyniszewski, A

    M. Szyniszewski, A. Romito, and H. Schomerus, Entan- glement transition from variable-strength weak measure- ments, Phys. Rev. B100, 064204 (2019)

  10. [10]

    X. Cao, A. Tilloy, and A. D. Luca, Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous monitoring, SciPost Phys.7, 024 (2019)

  11. [11]

    Lang and H

    N. Lang and H. P. B¨ uchler, Entanglement transition in the projective transverse field ising model, Phys. Rev. B 102, 094204 (2020)

  12. [12]

    M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Dynamical purifica- tion phase transition induced by quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. X10, 041020 (2020)

  13. [13]

    S. Choi, Y. Bao, X.-L. Qi, and E. Altman, Quantum er- ror correction in scrambling dynamics and measurement- induced phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 030505 (2020)

  14. [14]

    Nahum, S

    A. Nahum, S. Roy, B. Skinner, and J. Ruhman, Mea- surement and entanglement phase transitions in all-to- all quantum circuits, on quantum trees, and in landau- ginsburg theory, PRX Quantum2, 010352 (2021)

  15. [15]

    Zabalo, M

    A. Zabalo, M. J. Gullans, J. H. Wilson, S. Gopalakrish- nan, D. A. Huse, and J. H. Pixley, Critical properties of the measurement-induced transition in random quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B101, 060301 (2020)

  16. [16]

    Jian, Y.-Z

    C.-M. Jian, Y.-Z. You, R. Vasseur, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Measurement-induced criticality in random quantum cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. B101, 104302 (2020)

  17. [17]

    Turkeshi, A

    X. Turkeshi, A. Biella, R. Fazio, M. Dalmonte, and M. Schir´ o, Measurement-induced entanglement transi- tions in the quantum ising chain: From infinite to zero clicks, Phys. Rev. B103, 224210 (2021)

  18. [18]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, A. W. W. Ludwig, and M. P. A. Fisher, Conformal invariance and quantum nonlocality in critical hybrid circuits, Phys. Rev. B104, 104305 (2021)

  19. [19]

    M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Scalable probes of measurement-induced criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 070606 (2020)

  20. [20]

    Nahum and K

    A. Nahum and K. J. Wiese, Renormalization group for measurement and entanglement phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B108, 104203 (2023)

  21. [21]

    Khemani, A

    V. Khemani, A. Vishwanath, and D. A. Huse, Operator spreading and the emergence of dissipative hydrodynam- ics under unitary evolution with conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X8, 031057 (2018)

  22. [22]

    Rakovszky, F

    T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and C. W. von Keyserlingk, Diffusive hydrodynamics of out-of-time-ordered correla- tors with charge conservation, Phys. Rev. X8, 031058 (2018)

  23. [23]

    Rakovszky, F

    T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and C. von Keyserlingk, Sub- ballistic growth of r´ enyi entropies due to diffusion, Phys- ical Review Letters122, 10.1103/physrevlett.122.250602 (2019)

  24. [24]

    Zhou and A

    T. Zhou and A. W. W. Ludwig, Diffusive scaling of r´ enyi entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033020 (2020)

  25. [25]

    Huang, Dynamics of r´ enyi entanglement entropy in diffusive qudit systems, IOP SciNotes1, 035205 (2020)

    Y. Huang, Dynamics of r´ enyi entanglement entropy in diffusive qudit systems, IOP SciNotes1, 035205 (2020)

  26. [26]

    Agrawal, A

    U. Agrawal, A. Zabalo, K. Chen, J. H. Wilson, A. C. Potter, J. H. Pixley, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, Entanglement and charge-sharpening transitions in u(1) symmetric monitored quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. X12, 041002 (2022)

  27. [27]

    Barratt, U

    F. Barratt, U. Agrawal, A. C. Potter, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, Transitions in the learnability of global charges from local measurements, Physical Review Let- ters129, 10.1103/physrevlett.129.200602 (2022)

  28. [28]

    Manca, S

    F. Barratt, U. Agrawal, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, R. Vasseur, and A. C. Potter, Field theory of charge sharpening in symmetric monitored quantum circuits, Physical Review Letters129, 10.1103/phys- revlett.129.120604 (2022)

  29. [29]

    H. Guo, M. S. Foster, C.-M. Jian, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Field theory of monitored, interacting fermion dynamics with charge conservation (2024), arXiv:2410.07317 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

  30. [30]

    Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Symmetry enriched phases of quantum circuits, Annals of Physics435, 168618 (2021)

  31. [31]

    Majidy, U

    S. Majidy, U. Agrawal, S. Gopalakrishnan, A. C. Pot- ter, R. Vasseur, and N. Y. Halpern, Critical phase and spin sharpening in su(2)-symmetric monitored quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B108, 054307 (2023)

  32. [32]

    Gopalakrishnan, E

    S. Gopalakrishnan, E. McCulloch, and R. Vasseur, Monitored fluctuating hydrodynamics (2025), arXiv:2504.02734 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  33. [33]

    X. Feng, N. Fishchenko, S. Gopalakrishnan, and M. Ip- politi, Charge and Spin Sharpening Transitions on Dy- namical Quantum Trees, Quantum9, 1692 (2025)

  34. [34]

    Nahum and J

    A. Nahum and J. L. Jacobsen, Bayesian critical points in classical lattice models (2025), arXiv:2504.01264 [cond- 19 mat.stat-mech]

  35. [35]

    Dennis, A

    E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, Topological quantum memory, Journal of Mathematical Physics43, 4452–4505 (2002)

  36. [36]

    C. Wang, J. Harrington, and J. Preskill, Confinement- higgs transition in a disordered gauge theory and the ac- curacy threshold for quantum memory, Annals of Physics 303, 31–58 (2003)

  37. [37]

    R. Fan, Y. Bao, E. Altman, and A. Vishwanath, Diag- nostics of mixed-state topological order and breakdown of quantum memory, PRX Quantum5, 020343 (2024)

  38. [38]

    J. Y. Lee, C.-M. Jian, and C. Xu, Quantum criticality under decoherence or weak measurement, PRX Quantum 4, 030317 (2023)

  39. [39]

    J. Y. Lee, Exact calculations of coherent information for toric codes under decoherence: Identifying the fun- damental error threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 250601 (2025)

  40. [40]

    Niwa and J

    R. Niwa and J. Y. Lee, Coherent information for calderbank-shor-steane codes under decoherence, Phys. Rev. A111, 032402 (2025)

  41. [41]

    Lyons, Understanding Stabilizer Codes Under Local De- coherence Through A General Statistical Mechanics Mapping, arXiv:2403.03955

    A. Lyons, Understanding stabilizer codes under local de- coherence through a general statistical mechanics map- ping (2024), arXiv:2403.03955 [quant-ph]

  42. [42]

    Zhao and D

    Y. Zhao and D. E. Liu, Extracting error thresholds through the framework of approximate quantum error correction condition, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043258 (2024)

  43. [43]

    K. Su, Z. Yang, and C.-M. Jian, Tapestry of dualities in decohered quantum error correction codes, Physical Review B110, 10.1103/physrevb.110.085158 (2024)

  44. [44]

    Singh, R

    S. Singh, R. N. C. Pfeifer, and G. Vidal, Tensor net- work decompositions in the presence of a global symme- try, Phys. Rev. A82, 050301 (2010)

  45. [45]

    Singh, R

    S. Singh, R. N. C. Pfeifer, and G. Vidal, Tensor network states and algorithms in the presence of a global u(1) symmetry, Phys. Rev. B83, 115125 (2011)

  46. [46]

    Singh and G

    S. Singh and G. Vidal, Global symmetries in tensor net- work states: Symmetric tensors versus minimal bond di- mension, Phys. Rev. B88, 115147 (2013)

  47. [47]

    Emergent bulk gauge field in random tensor networks

    X.-L. Qi, Emergent bulk gauge field in random tensor networks (2022), arXiv:2209.02940 [hep-th]

  48. [48]

    Penrose, Angular momentum: an approach to com- binatorial space-time, Quantum theory and beyond151 (1971)

    R. Penrose, Angular momentum: an approach to com- binatorial space-time, Quantum theory and beyond151 (1971)

  49. [49]

    J. C. Baez, Spin networks in gauge theory, Advances in Mathematics117, 253–272 (1996)

  50. [50]

    Rovelli and L

    C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, Spin networks and quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D52, 5743 (1995)

  51. [51]

    Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of Physics303, 2–30 (2003)

    A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of Physics303, 2–30 (2003)

  52. [52]

    S. B. Bravyi and A. Y. Kitaev, Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary (1998), arXiv:quant-ph/9811052 [quant-ph]

  53. [53]

    T.-C. Lu, T. H. Hsieh, and T. Grover, Detecting topo- logical order at finite temperature using entanglement negativity, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 116801 (2020)

  54. [54]

    Separability Transitions in Topological States Induced by Local Decoherence

    Y.-H. Chen and T. Grover, Separability transitions in topological states induced by local decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 170602 (2024)

  55. [55]

    Akers and A

    C. Akers and A. Y. Wei, Background independent tensor networks, SciPost Phys.17, 090 (2024)

  56. [56]

    Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications10, 285 (1975)

    M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications10, 285 (1975)

  57. [57]

    Jamio lkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathematical Physics3, 275 (1972)

    A. Jamio lkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathematical Physics3, 275 (1972)

  58. [58]

    This is the complex conjugate of how these coefficients are usually defined which would correspond to the case of two incoming legs and one outgoing leg

  59. [59]

    A. R. Edmonds,Angular momentum in quantum me- chanics, Vol. 4 (Princeton university press, 1996)

  60. [60]

    Hayden, S

    P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Wal- ter, and Z. Yang, Holographic duality from random ten- sor networks, Journal of High Energy Physics2016, 10.1007/jhep11(2016)009 (2016)

  61. [61]

    Donnelly, Decomposition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theory, Phys

    W. Donnelly, Decomposition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D85, 085004 (2012)

  62. [62]

    Donnelly, Entanglement entropy and nonabelian gauge symmetry, Classical and Quantum Gravity31, 214003 (2014)

    W. Donnelly, Entanglement entropy and nonabelian gauge symmetry, Classical and Quantum Gravity31, 214003 (2014)

  63. [63]

    Zhou and A

    T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Emergent statistical mechanics of entanglement in random unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. B99, 174205 (2019)

  64. [64]

    Ogunnaike, J

    O. Ogunnaike, J. Feldmeier, and J. Y. Lee, Unify- ing emergent hydrodynamics and lindbladian low-energy spectra across symmetries, constraints, and long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 220403 (2023)

  65. [65]

    L. A. Lessa, R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry break- ing in mixed quantum states (2024), arXiv:2405.03639 [quant-ph]

  66. [66]

    P. Sala, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Oshikawa, and Y. You, Spontaneous strong symmetry breaking in open systems: Purification perspective (2024), arXiv:2405.02402 [quant- ph]

  67. [67]

    J. Kim, E. Altman, and J. Y. Lee, Error threshold of syk codes from strong-to-weak parity symmetry breaking (2024), arXiv:2410.24225 [quant-ph]

  68. [68]

    D. Gu, Z. Wang, and Z. Wang, Spontaneous symmetry breaking in open quantum systems: strong, weak, and strong-to-weak (2024), arXiv:2406.19381 [quant-ph]

  69. [69]

    Vijay and J

    A. Vijay and J. Y. Lee, To appear (2025)

  70. [70]

    Lloyd, Capacity of the noisy quantum channel, Phys

    S. Lloyd, Capacity of the noisy quantum channel, Phys. Rev. A55, 1613 (1997)

  71. [71]

    P. W. Shor, Capacities of quantum channels and how to find them, Mathematical Programming97, 311–335 (2003)

  72. [72]

    Devetak, The private classical capacity and quan- tum capacity of a quantum channel (2004), arXiv:quant- ph/0304127 [quant-ph]

    I. Devetak, The private classical capacity and quan- tum capacity of a quantum channel (2004), arXiv:quant- ph/0304127 [quant-ph]

  73. [73]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computa- tion and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edi- tion(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

  74. [74]

    Elitzur, R

    S. Elitzur, R. B. Pearson, and J. Shigemitsu, Phase struc- ture of discrete abelian spin and gauge systems, Phys. Rev. D19, 3698 (1979)

  75. [75]

    J. V. Jos´ e, L. P. Kadanoff, S. Kirkpatrick, and D. R. Nel- son, Renormalization, vortices, and symmetry-breaking perturbations in the two-dimensional planar model, Phys. Rev. B16, 1217 (1977)

  76. [76]

    J. L. Cardy, General discrete planar models in two dimen- sions: Duality properties and phase diagrams, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General13, 1507 (1980)

  77. [77]

    V. A. Fateev and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Parafermionic Currents in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory and Selfdual Critical Points in Z(n) Invari- ant Statistical Systems, Sov. Phys. JETP62, 215 (1985). 20

  78. [78]

    M. S. S. Challa and D. P. Landau, Critical behavior of the six-state clock model in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B33, 437 (1986)

  79. [79]

    Chatterjee, S

    S. Chatterjee, S. Puri, and R. Paul, Ordering kinetics in theq-state clock model: Scaling properties and growth laws, Phys. Rev. E98, 032109 (2018)

  80. [80]

    G. Li, K. H. Pai, and Z.-C. Gu, Tensor-network renor- malization approach to the q-state clock model, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023159 (2022)

Showing first 80 references.