Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 73 references

Boltzmann transport theory of magnon-exciton drag

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A microscopic theory shows that magnons in bilayer CrSBr can efficiently drag excitons, giving sub-picosecond scattering and nearly isotropic exciton propagation that can exceed the material's intrinsic anisotropic diffusion.

desk verdict The microscopic coupling and two-magnon collision integrals are new and solid; the drag mechanism is real, but the paper does not demonstrate that it drives the anomalous transport seen in experiment. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.05835 v3 pith:5N7KOM4S submitted 2025-12-05 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph

Zakhar A. Iakovlev , Akashdeep Kamra , Mikhail M. Glazov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph
keywords magnon-excitondragCrSBrBoltzmanntransportexcitontwo-magnonprocessesorbitalcouplingantiferromagneticvanderWaalsdiffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a microscopic theory of magnon-exciton drag in bilayer CrSBr. The authors derive an orbital coupling in which magnons tilt the layer magnetizations, allowing charge-carrier tunneling that mixes direct and indirect excitons and shifts the exciton energy. Solving the Boltzmann kinetic equation, they find an exciton-magnon scattering time in the sub-picosecond range at tens of kelvin, growing as temperature squared, so that magnon scattering can dominate phonon and disorder scattering. The central payoff is that magnons can drag excitons: the exciton drift velocity approaches the magnon drift velocity, producing a large, nearly isotropic contribution to exciton diffusion. The paper also notes in Section VIII that its quasiequilibrium assumption does not capture the negative drag and superdiffusive transport seen in recent experiments.

What carries the argument

The key object is the effective exciton-magnon Hamiltonian built from the orbital coupling: magnon-induced tilting allows electron tunneling between layers, so the coupling is quadratic in magnon operators and drives two-magnon processes. The Boltzmann collision integrals for scattering, absorption, and emission are evaluated using quasiequilibrium distribution functions with a common temperature and magnon drift velocity u, with the magnon spectrum computed via Holstein-Primakoff transformation including exchange, anisotropy, and dipole-dipole interactions. The final relaxation-time expression 1/τ_{XM} = 8π|V|²D_M D_X (k_B T/ℏ)Φ(E_X, T, E_M0) is what carries the drag argument.

What would settle it

Measure the temperature and magnon-flux dependence of the exciton diffusivity tensor in a CrSBr bilayer: the theory predicts a drag contribution that grows with magnon density and saturates at the magnon drift velocity, with the scattering rate scaling as T² and reaching sub-picosecond timescales. Observing no saturation, no T² scaling, or an anisotropic drag-dominated diffusivity at low temperatures would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that magnons efficiently drag excitons in bilayer CrSBr. Starting from an orbital mechanism—magnons tilt layer magnetizations and enable interlayer tunneling that mixes intralayer and interlayer excitons—the authors derive an effective exciton-magnon Hamiltonian quadratic in magnon operators. This supports three two-magnon processes: scattering, two-magnon absorption, and two-magnon emission. Within a Boltzmann transport description with quasiequilibrium exciton and magnon distributions, the collision integral reduces to a relaxation-time form with rate growing as (k_B T)^2 and reaching sub-ps values at tens of kelvin. The resulting drag relation v = (1 + τΓ)^{-1} u show

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the magnon cloud is in quasiequilibrium, described by a single temperature and drift velocity u (Eq. 49); if the true magnon distribution is far from equilibrium, as in the motivating experiments, the derived v = (1 + τΓ)^{-1}u drag form need not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Above a few tens of kelvin, exciton-magnon scattering should dominate exciton momentum relaxation compared with phonon and disorder scattering.
  • When magnon-unrelated relaxation is weak, the exciton drift velocity approaches the magnon drift velocity, giving a large drag-enhanced propagation.
  • The drag contribution to exciton diffusion is nearly isotropic because the magnon dispersion is less anisotropic than the bare exciton mass, explaining observed nearly isotropic transport.
  • Non-equilibrium magnon populations, with higher magnon densities, reduce the scattering time further and strengthen the drag effect.
  • The quasiequilibrium analysis predicts ordinary positive drag, while the negative drag and superdiffusive transport observed experimentally are attributed to far-from-equilibrium magnon distributions beyond this model.
  • The quasiequilibrium analysis predicts ordinary positive drag, while the negative drag and superdiffusive transport observed experimentally are attributed to far-from-equilibrium magnon distributions beyond this model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the drag mechanism is generic, similar orbital coupling should appear in other layered antiferromagnets where interlayer tunneling is spin-forbidden in the ground state; the material parameters that maximize it are large interlayer tunneling, small direct-indirect exciton splitting, and a small magnon gap.
  • A testable extension is to compute far-from-equilibrium magnon distributions and show whether negative drag arises naturally when dipolar low-wavevector magnons carry momentum opposite to their group velocity.
  • The predicted T² scaling of the scattering rate could be checked by temperature-dependent exciton linewidth or transient-grating measurements, separating magnon drag from phonon contributions.
  • Electrical or thermal magnon injection could become a practical control knob for exciton propagation in magnetic semiconductors, going beyond optical experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops a microscopic Boltzmann theory of magnon-exciton drag in a CrSBr bilayer. The authors construct a magnon Hamiltonian with exchange, single-ion anisotropy, and dipolar interactions, and derive an orbital exciton-magnon coupling in which magnon-induced tilting of layer magnetizations enables interlayer electron tunneling that mixes direct and indirect excitons, producing two-magnon vertices. They evaluate the resulting polaron self-energy (small, <1% mass renormalization) and then derive linearized collision integrals for magnon-exciton scattering, two-magnon absorption, and two-magnon emission under a drifted thermal magnon distribution (Eq. 49). The resulting scattering rate (Eqs. 60-61) grows as T^2 and reaches sub-ps values at tens of K. In the quasiequilibrium regime, the drag velocity is v=(1+τΓ)^{-1}u (Eq. 67), implying near-isotropic, magnon-dominated exciton propagation if τΓ≪1. The paper closes by positioning these results as a theoretical basis for anomalous exciton transport reported in Ref. [16], while explicitly listing limitations including the absence of negative drag and superdiffusive transport.

Significance. If the derivations are correct, this is a valuable contribution: it provides a concrete orbital coupling mechanism with no fitted drag parameters, an analytic T^2 law for the magnon-exciton relaxation rate, sub-ps rates, and falsifiable temperature and density dependences. The appendices give the collision integrals and polaron calculation in sufficient detail to be checked, and the input parameters are taken from independent measurements. The central caveat is that the experimentally motivating observations in Ref. [16] are largely in the far-from-equilibrium regime, which the paper explicitly excludes; additionally, the claimed dominance over phonon/disorder relaxation is asserted rather than demonstrated by an estimate of Γ. Thus the paper establishes a plausible and well-defined mechanism, but the strength of the experimental-connection claim needs adjustment or additional quantitative support.

major comments (4)
  1. [§VII A, Eq. (67)] The efficiency of the drag effect is controlled by τ̄_XM Γ̂, but Γ̂ is never estimated. The paper states only that it is 'plausible' that magnon scattering dominates (Sec. VII B) and refrains from quantitative comparison with Ref. [16]. Without a numerical bound on the exciton-phonon and exciton-disorder momentum relaxation rates from known linewidths or mobilities, the central conclusion that magnon drag can 'significantly exceed intrinsic anisotropic diffusion' is not established. Please provide such an estimate or explicitly state the result as conditional on Γ̂ ≪ 1/τ̄_XM.
  2. [§II, §VII B, §VIII, Eq. (49)] The quasiequilibrium drifted-Bose ansatz is load-bearing for the drag formula Eq. (67), yet the paper explicitly disclaims its applicability to the observed negative magnon-exciton drag and superdiffusive transport in Ref. [16] (Sec. VIII). The abstract's statement that the results 'provide a theoretical basis' for the anomalous transport in Ref. [16] therefore overstates what the model demonstrates. The manuscript should either restrict the experimental-connection claim to the near-equilibrium large-isotropic-diffusion component and characterize the missing far-from-equilibrium calculation, or include a nonequilibrium calculation that actually addresses the observed regime.
  3. [§VI C and Appendix E, Eqs. (54)-(55)] The scattering collision integral is derived by neglecting magnon energies in the energy-conserving δ-function, justified by large magnon effective masses. With the parameters in Table I, m_x^mag/M_x ≈ 7.2 and m_y^mag/M_y ≈ 39; the relevant quasielasticity parameter for thermal momenta is of order sqrt(m_X/m_M), which is ≈0.37 along x. This is not a very small parameter, and the corrections to the 1/τ_XM expression (60) and to the claimed isotropy are not quantified. Please estimate the leading corrections or qualify the validity range.
  4. [§VII B, Eq. (69)] The extension to non-equilibrium magnons replaces E_M0 by E_M0 - μ_M in the denominator, making the rate diverge as μ_M → E_M0. However, the linearization δg ≪ g0 underlying the collision integral (59) breaks down in exactly that regime, where the magnon distribution is strongly degenerate. The claim that a high non-equilibrium magnon density automatically yields very efficient drag should be accompanied by a validity criterion for the linearized treatment.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§V, Eq. (43) and Fig. 4] The notation M^α_XMP/M^α is used for both the mass ratio and its deviation; define (M_XMP - M)/M explicitly in the text and captions.
  2. [Table I] The labels 'mx/m' and 'my/m' are ambiguous; use e.g. m_x^mag/m0. Also clarify that E_M0 is the magnon gap at k=0 when it first appears before Eq. (60).
  3. [§III B / Appendix B] The validity condition kL≪1 for the thin-film dispersion is mentioned only in passing; state it alongside Eq. (B13) and explain how it constrains the few-layer samples used in experiments.
  4. [§VI B, Eq. (49)] The ansatz assumes a single temperature for excitons and magnons; later Eq. (68) allows separate T_M and μ. Specify the condition ℏpu ≪ k_BT for the linearization (50) and give the corresponding upper bound on u for the material parameters.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central scattering rates and drag velocity are computed from externally fixed material parameters, not fitted to the target experiment; the quasiequilibrium ansatz and its stated limitations are assumptions, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The magnon dispersion is constructed from a stated spin Hamiltonian with parameters taken from independent literature (Refs. [8, 29, 37], Table I), and the dipole-dipole corrections are rederived in Sec. III B and Appendices A-B. Although Sec. III A says it follows Ref. [16] for the dispersion outline, and Ref. [16] shares authors with the present paper, the dispersion is not imported as an unverified uniqueness or ansatz result; the equations are derived in the text and the parameters are external. The exciton-magnon coupling is derived microscopically in Sec. IV from t_e, E_D, E_I taken from Refs. [5,7], again independent inputs. The scattering rate, Eq. (61), and the drag result, Eq. (67), are obtained by solving the stated linearized Boltzmann equation; the paper explicitly does not fit the observed diffusivity: 'We refrain from detailed quantitative comparison with experiments which requires microscopic calculation of the magnon distribution function and velocity u under experimental conditions' (Sec. VII B). This absence of fitting is the opposite of a fitted-input-called-prediction. The quasiequilibrium assumption, Eq. (49), is a stated modeling assumption, and its limitation is explicitly acknowledged in Sec. VIII: 'our quasiequilibrium analysis does not capture the negative magnon-exciton drag observed in experiments [16]' and does not capture superdiffusive transport. That scope limitation weakens the link to the motivating experiment but is not a circular step. The only self-citation that approaches load-bearing status is the 'following Ref. [16]' passage for magnon dispersion and dipole contributions; since the calculation is reproduced in the paper and the dipolar negative-velocity modes are explicitly said not to be central to the coupled transport, this is at most a minor self-citation that is not load-bearing. The absence of a numerical estimate for the magnon-unrelated relaxation tensor Gamma is a stated 'plausible' assumption rather than a fitted parameter, and thus does not constitute circularity either.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The quantitative results rely on a set of material parameters measured or calculated in prior experiments/DFT; no new free parameters are introduced to fit the target drag observation. The main theoretical axioms are standard for Boltzmann transport, but the quasiequilibrium magnon distribution is a significant limitation for the experimental target condition.

free parameters (5)
  • t_e (electron interlayer tunneling amplitude) = 53 meV
    Taken from experimental magneto-exciton coupling in CrSBr (Ref. [5]) and exciton calculations (Ref. [7]). Central to the coupling V = (A_0/2) t_e^2/(4SΔ).
  • Δ = E_D - E_I (direct-indirect exciton splitting) = 120 meV (E_D = 200 meV, E_I = 80 meV)
    From experimental and calculated exciton binding energies (Refs. [5,7]). Appears in the denominator of V and in the polaron energy.
  • E_M0 (magnon gap / cutoff energy at k=0) = ≈0.1 meV
    Derived from anisotropy and interlayer exchange parameters K_x = 14 μeV, K_z = 58 μeV, J_int = 6 μeV. Controls the scattering rates via the factor k_B T/E_M0 in the collision integrals.
  • Magnon effective masses (via J_1...J_7) = from Refs. [8,29] exchange constants
    Determines the magnon density of states D_M and the validity of the large-magnon-mass approximation.
  • Exciton effective masses = M_x = 10.15 m_0, M_y = 0.59 m_0
    From quasiparticle band calculations (Ref. [20]). Determines the exciton density of states D_X and the intrinsic anisotropic diffusivity.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Holstein-Primakoff transformation linearized to first order in magnon operators, assuming low magnon occupancy
    Introduced in Eq. (7) and used throughout; valid for not-too-high magnon populations.
  • domain assumption Only electron tunneling is retained, |t_e| >> |t_h|
    Stated in Sec. IV A; simplifies the Hamiltonian and removes interlayer direct-exciton mixing terms. Parameter values support this hierarchy but it is an input.
  • domain assumption Quasiequilibrium distributions for magnons and excitons, with a single drift velocity u for magnons
    Eqs. (49)-(51). Load-bearing for the drag formula; the authors note in Sec. VIII that it excludes negative drag and superdiffusion seen experimentally.
  • domain assumption Magnon effective masses are much larger than exciton masses, so magnon energies can be neglected in energy-conserving delta functions
    Used throughout Appendix E; from Table I this is plausible (estimated magnon masses ~100 m_e vs exciton masses ≤10 m_e), but not explicitly computed in the paper.
  • domain assumption Momentum-independent interaction matrix element V, with asymptotic transformation coefficients (C1) and degenerate magnon branches
    Sec. VI A and Appendix C; approximations simplify the Hamiltonian and collision integrals but ignore the dipolar branch splitting and finite-wavevector form factors.
  • domain assumption Boltzmann wavepacket treatment with linearization in δg and neglect of exciton feedback on magnons
    Sec. VI; appropriate for small exciton density and weak perturbations, but excludes wave-like coherent drag inherently biasing the drag velocity bound.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Boltzmann transport theory of magnon-exciton drag." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5N7KOM4S

@misc{pith2026251205835,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Boltzmann transport theory of magnon-exciton drag},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5N7KOM4S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.05835}
}
read the original abstract

We develop a microscopic theory of magnon-exciton drag effect in a bilayer van der Waals antiferromagnetic semiconductor CrSBr. Effective exciton-magnon coupling arises from an orbital mechanism: Magnons tilt the layer magnetizations, enabling charge carrier tunneling that mixes intra- and interlayer excitons and thereby modulate the exciton energy. We derive the effective Hamiltonian of exciton-magnon coupling, based on our calculation of the magnon spectrum taking into account short-range exchange interaction between Cr-ion spins, single-ion anisotropy, and long-range dipole-dipole interactions. The latter produces a negative group velocity of magnons at small wavevectors. We show that despite rather small renormalization of exciton's energy and effective mass by the exciton-magnon interaction, the three key two-magnon processes: exciton-magnon scattering, two-magnon absorption by exciton, and two-magnon emission are highly efficient. By solving the Boltzmann kinetic equation, we evaluate short exciton-magnon scattering time which is in the sub-ps range and strongly decreases with the increase of magnon population. Hence, exciton-magnon scattering is likely to be dominant over other scattering processes related to the exciton-phonon and exciton-disorder interactions. We demonstrate that magnons can efficiently drag excitons, resulting in a large and nearly isotropic exciton propagation that can significantly exceed the intrinsic anisotropic diffusion. Our results provide a theoretical basis for recent observations of anomalous exciton transport in CrSBr [F. Dirnberger, et al., Nat. Nano. (2025)] and establish magnon-exciton drag as a powerful mechanism for controlling exciton propagation in magnetic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.05835 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of magnon-exciton drag ef [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Magnon dispersion for the full Brillouin zone. On [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. In equilibrium, the magnetization of the neigh [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic illustration of the relevant two-magnon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Exciton-magnon polaron binding energy as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Exciton-magnon scattering rate as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Magnon dispersion at small wavevectors k for differ￾ent number of layers. Group velocity reaches u+ ≈ −200 m/s for 20 layers. Noteworthy, in the limit of k → 0 the decomposition of Eqs. (B14) and (B21) yields, at N = 1, expressions derived in Sec. III B of the main tex…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Relevant combinations of transformation coeffi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    Dirnberger, S

    F. Dirnberger, S. Terres, Z. A. Iakovlev, K. Mosina, Z. Sofer, A. Kamra, M. M. Glazov, and A. Chernikov, Exciton transport driven by spin excitations in an antifer- romagnet (2025), arXiv:2507.07071 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    Q. H. Wang, A. Bedoya-Pinto, M. Blei, A. H. Dismukes, A. Hamo, S. Jenkins, M. Koperski, Y. Liu, Q.-C. Sun, E. J. Telford, H. H. Kim, M. Augustin, U. Vool, J.- X. Yin, L. H. Li, A. Falin, C. R. Dean, F. Casanova, R. F. L. Evans, M. Chshiev, A. Mishchenko, C. Petrovic, R. He, L. Zhao, A. W. Tsen, B. D. Gerardot, M. Brotons- Gisbert, Z. Guguchia, X. Roy, S. ...

    2022

  3. [2]

    K. S. Burch, D. Mandrus, and J.-G. Park, Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials, Nature563, 47–52 (2018)

    2018

  4. [3]

    N. J. Brennan, C. A. Noble, J. Tang, M. E. Ziebel, and Y. J. Bae, Important elements of spin-exciton and magnon-exciton coupling, ACS Physical Chemistry4, 322 (2024)

    2024

  5. [4]

    Dirnberger, R

    F. Dirnberger, R. Bushati, B. Datta, A. Kumar, A. H. MacDonald, E. Baldini, and V. M. Menon, Spin- correlated exciton–polaritons in a van der Waals magnet, Nature Nanotechnology17, 1060–1064 (2022)

    2022

  6. [5]

    N. P. Wilson, K. Lee, J. Cenker, K. Xie, A. H. Dismukes, E. J. Telford, J. Fonseca, S. Sivakumar, C. Dean, T. Cao, X. Roy, X. Xu, and X. Zhu, Interlayer electronic coupling on demand in a 2D magnetic semiconductor, Nature Ma- terials20, 1657 (2021)

    2021

  7. [6]

    Heißenb¨ uttel, P.-M

    M.-C. Heißenb¨ uttel, P.-M. Piel, J. Klein, T. Deilmann, U. Wurstbauer, and M. Rohlfing, Quadratic optical re- sponse to a magnetic field in the layered magnet CrSBr, Phys. Rev. B111, 075107 (2025)

    2025

  8. [7]

    M. A. Semina, F. Tabataba-Vakili, A. Rupp, A. S. Baimuratov, A. H¨ ogele, and M. M. Glazov, Excitons and trions in CrSBr bilayers, Phys. Rev. B111, 205301 (2025)

    2025

Show all 73 references
  1. [8]

    Y. J. Bae, J. Wang, A. Scheie, J. Xu, D. G. Chica, G. M. Diederich, J. Cenker, M. E. Ziebel, Y. Bai, H. Ren, C. R. Dean, M. Delor, X. Xu, X. Roy, A. D. Kent, and X. Zhu, Exciton-coupled coherent magnons in a 2d semiconduc- tor, Nature609, 282–286 (2022). 16

    2022

  2. [9]

    G. M. Diederich, J. Cenker, Y. Ren, J. Fonseca, D. G. Chica, Y. J. Bae, X. Zhu, X. Roy, T. Cao, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Tunable interaction between excitons and hybridized magnons in a layered semiconductor, Nature Nanotechnology18, 23–28 (2022)

    2022

  3. [10]

    Dirnberger, J

    F. Dirnberger, J. Quan, R. Bushati, G. M. Diederich, M. Florian, J. Klein, K. Mosina, Z. Sofer, X. Xu, A. Kamra, F. J. Garc ´ ıa-Vidal, A. Al` u, and V. M. Menon, Magneto-optics in a van der Waals magnet tuned by self- hybridized polaritons, Nature620, 533–537 (2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    Johansen, A

    O. Johansen, A. Kamra, C. Ulloa, A. Brataas, and R. A. Duine, Magnon-mediated indirect exciton condensation through antiferromagnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 167203 (2019)

    2019

  5. [12]

    Datta, P

    B. Datta, P. C. Adak, S. Yu, A. Valiyaparambil Dharma- palan, S. J. Hall, A. Vakulenko, F. Komissarenko, E. Kurganov, J. Quan, W. Wang, K. Mosina, Z. Sofer, D. Pashov, M. van Schilfgaarde, S. Acharya, A. Kamra, M. Y. Sfeir, A. Al` u, A. B. Khanikaev, and V. M. Menon, Magnon-me...

    2025

  6. [13]

    B. Han, H. Shan, K. W. Song, L. Lackner, M. Es- mann, V. Solovyeva, F. Eilenberger, J. Regner, Z. Sofer, O. Kyriienko, and C. Schneider, Exciton-polariton con- densate in the van der Waals magnet CrSBr (2025), arXiv:2501.18233 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2025

  7. [14]

    Yazdani, M

    N. Yazdani, M. I. Bodnarchuk, F. Bertolotti, N. Mas- ciocchi, I. Fureraj, B. Guzelturk, B. L. Cotts, M. Zajac, G. Rain` o, M. Jansen, S. C. Boehme, M. Yarema, M.- F. Lin, M. Kozina, A. Reid, X. Shen, S. Weathersby, X. Wang, E. Vauthey, A. Guagliardi, M. V. Kovalenko, V. Wood, ...

    2023

  8. [15]

    M. M. Glazov, Phonon wind and drag of excitons in monolayer semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B100, 045426 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Bailyn, Maximum variational principle for conduction problems in a magnetic field, and the theory of magnon drag, Phys

    M. Bailyn, Maximum variational principle for conduction problems in a magnetic field, and the theory of magnon drag, Phys. Rev.126, 2040 (1962)

  10. [18]

    Zanmarchi and C

    G. Zanmarchi and C. Haas, Magnon drag, Philips Res. Rept.23, 389 (1968)

    1968

  11. [19]

    Sugihara, Thermoelectric power of antiferromagnetic semiconductors near the n´ eel temperature, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids34, 1727 (1973)

    K. Sugihara, Thermoelectric power of antiferromagnetic semiconductors near the n´ eel temperature, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids34, 1727 (1973)

    1973

  12. [20]

    Klein, B

    J. Klein, B. Pingault, M. Florian, M.-C. Heißenb¨ uttel, A. Steinhoff, Z. Song, K. Torres, F. Dirnberger, J. B. Curtis, M. Weile, A. Penn, T. Deilmann, R. Dana, R. Bushati, J. Quan, J. Luxa, Z. Sofer, A. Al` u, V. M. Menon, U. Wurstbauer, M. Rohlfing, P. Narang, M. Lonˇ car, a...

    2023

  13. [21]

    Damon and J

    R. Damon and J. Eshbach, Magnetostatic modes of a ferromagnet slab, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids19, 308 (1961)

    1961

  14. [22]

    B. A. Kalinikos and A. N. Slavin, Theory of dipole- exchange spin wave spectrum for ferromagnetic films with mixed exchange boundary conditions, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics19, 7013 (1986)

    1986

  15. [23]

    R. L. Stamps and R. E. Camley, Bulk and surface spin waves in thin-film antiferromagnets, Journal of Applied Physics56, 3497 (1984)

    1984

  16. [24]

    Kamra, U

    A. Kamra, U. Agrawal, and W. Belzig, Noninteger-spin magnonic excitations in untextured magnets, Phys. Rev. B96, 020411 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    A. E. Kanj, O. Gomonay, I. Boventer, P. Bortolotti, V. Cros, A. Anane, and R. Lebrun, Antiferromagnetic magnon spintronic based on nonreciprocal and nonde- generated ultra-fast spin-waves in the canted antiferro- magnet fe2o3, Science Advances9, eadh1601 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Y. Sun, F. Meng, C. Lee, A. Soll, H. Zhang, R. Ramesh, J. Yao, Z. Sofer, and J. Orenstein, Dipolar spin wave packet transport in a van der Waals antiferromagnet, Na- ture Physics20, 794–800 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    J. N. Ranhili, S. Khadka, J. Li, J. Cenker, A. M. Ruiz, A. Shumilin, J. J. Baldov ´ ı, K. Shen, M. Fe- durin, M. Palmer, D. G. Chica, P. Byaruhanga, S. Chen, X. Xu, X. Roy, and B. Freelon, Ultrafast-induced co- herent acoustic phonons in the two-dimensional magnet CrSBr, Struc...

    2025

  20. [28]

    Liu and K

    H. Liu and K. Shen, Spin wave dynamics excited by a focused laser pulse in antiferromagnet CrSBr, Phys. Rev. B110, 024424 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Scheie, M

    A. Scheie, M. Ziebel, D. G. Chica, Y. J. Bae, X. Wang, A. I. Kolesnikov, X. Zhu, and X. Roy, Spin waves and magnetic exchange hamiltonian in CrSBr, Advanced Sci- ence9, 2202467 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Kamra, H

    A. Kamra, H. Keshtgar, P. Yan, and G. E. W. Bauer, Coherent elastic excitation of spin waves, Phys. Rev. B 91, 104409 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Kikkawa, K

    T. Kikkawa, K. Shen, B. Flebus, R. A. Duine, K.-i. Uchida, Z. Qiu, G. E. W. Bauer, and E. Saitoh, Magnon polarons in the spin seebeck effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 207203 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    Fr¨ ohlich, Electrons in lattice fields, Advances in Physics3, 325 (1954), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018735400101213

    H. Fr¨ ohlich, Electrons in lattice fields, Advances in Physics3, 325 (1954), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018735400101213

    1954 doi

  25. [33]

    Eremenko, N

    V. Eremenko, N. Kharchenko, Y. Litvinenko, and V. Naumenko,Magneto-Optics and Spectroscopy of An- tiferromagnets(Springer New York, 2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    Yamamoto, D

    H. Yamamoto, D. S. McClure, C. Marzzacco, and M. Waldman, Energy migration in a nearly one- dimensional compound, tetramethyl ammonium man- ganese chloride (tmmc), Chemical Physics22, 79 (1977)

    1977

  27. [35]

    G. L. McPherson and A. H. Francis, Extensive energy transfer in a nearly one-dimensional crystal: The emisson spectrum of CsMnBr3 doped with Nd3+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1681 (1978)

    1978

  28. [36]

    Ueda and Y

    K. Ueda and Y. Tanabe, Exciton motion in antiferromag- nets, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan48, 1137 (1980)

    1980

  29. [37]

    X. Bo, F. Li, X. Xu, X. Wan, and Y. Pu, Calculated magnetic exchange interactions in the van der Waals lay- ered magnet CrSBr, New Journal of Physics25, 013026 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    den Teuling, R

    R. den Teuling, R. Das, A. V. Bondarenko, E. V. Tar- takovskaya, G. E. W. Bauer, and Y. M. Blanter, Spin waves in the bilayer van der Waals magnet CrSBr, Phys. Rev. B112, 144442 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Tabataba-Vakili, H

    F. Tabataba-Vakili, H. P. G. Nguyen, A. Rupp, K. Mosina, A. Papavasileiou, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, 17 P. Maletinsky, M. M. Glazov, Z. Sofer, A. S. Baimura- tov, and A. H¨ ogele, Doping-control of excitons and mag- netism in few-layer CrSBr, Nature Communications15, 4735 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    P. G. de Gennes, Effects of double exchange in magnetic crystals, Phys. Rev.118, 141 (1960)

    1960

  33. [41]

    E. L. Nagaev, Ground state and anomalous magnetic moment of conduction electrons in an antiferromagnetic semiconductor, JETP Lett.6, 18 (1967)

    1967

  34. [42]

    Mauger and D

    A. Mauger and D. L. Mills, Role of conduction-electron– local-moment exchange in antiferromagnetic semiconduc- tors: Ferrons and bound magnetic polarons, Phys. Rev. B31, 8024 (1985)

    1985

  35. [43]

    P. A. Wolff, Theory of bound magnetic polarons in semimagnetic semiconductors, inSemiconductors and Semimetals, Vol. 25, edited by J. K. Furdyna and J. Kos- sut (Elsevier, 1988) pp. 413–454

    1988

  36. [44]

    E. L. Nagaev, Self-trapped states of charge carriers in magnetic semiconductors, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials110, 39 (1992)

    1992

  37. [45]

    I. A. Merkulov, D. R. Yakovlev, K. V. Kavokin, G. Mackh, W. Ossau, A. Waag, and G. Landwehr, Hi- erarchy of relaxation times in the formation of an ex- citonic magnetic polaron in (CdMn)Te, JETP Lett.62, 335 (1995)

    1995

  38. [46]

    Benoit ` a la Guillaume, Y

    C. Benoit ` a la Guillaume, Y. G. Semenov, and M. Combescot, Free magnetic polaron: A nonlinear Hamiltonian approach, Phys. Rev. B51, 14124 (1995)

    1995

  39. [47]

    A. S. Alexandrov and J. T. Devreese,Advances in Po- laron Physics(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010)

    2010

  40. [48]

    M. M. Glazov, M. A. Semina, C. Robert, B. Urbaszek, T. Amand, and X. Marie, Intervalley polaron in atomi- cally thin transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 100, 041301 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Z. A. Iakovlev, M. A. Semina, M. M. Glazov, and E. Y. Sherman, Flexural deformations and collapse of bilayer two-dimensional crystals by interlayer excitons, Phys. Rev. B105, 205305 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    V. F. Gantmakher and Y. B. Levinson,Carrier Scatter- ing in Metals and Semiconductors(North-Holland Pub- lishing Company, 1987)

    1987

  43. [51]

    V. N. Mantsevich and M. M. Glazov, Viscous hydrody- namics of excitons in van der Waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B110, 165305 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Chernikov and M

    A. Chernikov and M. M. Glazov, Chapter Three: Ex- citon diffusion in 2D van der Waals semiconductors, in Semiconductors and Semimetals, Vol. 112, edited by P. B. Deotare and Z. Mi (Elsevier, 2023) pp. 69–110

    2023

  45. [53]

    P. G. De Gennes and J. Friedel, Anomalies de r´ esistivit´ e dans certains m´ etaux magn ´ ıques, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids4, 71 (1958)

    1958

  46. [54]

    M. E. Fisher and J. S. Langer, Resistive anomalies at magnetic critical points, Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 665 (1968)

    1968

  47. [55]

    Suezaki and H

    Y. Suezaki and H. Mori, Dynamic critical phenomena in magnetic systems. II: electrical resistivity near the n´ eel point, Progress of Theoretical Physics41, 1177 (1969)

    1969

  48. [56]

    Kasuya and A

    T. Kasuya and A. Kondo, Anomalous resistivity near Curie temperature due to the critical scattering, Solid State Communications14, 253 (1974)

    1974

  49. [57]

    Ausloos, On the N´ eel temperature and critical expo- nents determined from electronic transport coefficients in magnetic metals, Physica B+C86-88, 338 (1977)

    M. Ausloos, On the N´ eel temperature and critical expo- nents determined from electronic transport coefficients in magnetic metals, Physica B+C86-88, 338 (1977)

    1977

  50. [58]

    Adachi, K

    H. Adachi, K. Uchida, E. Saitoh, and S. Maekawa, The- ory of the spin Seebeck effect, Reports on Progress in Physics76, 036501 (2013)

    2013

  51. [59]

    Q. Cui, X. Bai, and A. Delin, Anisotropic magnon trans- port in van der Waals ferromagnetic insulators, Advanced Functional Materialsn/a, 2407469 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Flebus, R

    B. Flebus, R. A. Duine, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Landau- lifshitz theory of the magnon-drag thermopower, Euro- physics Letters115, 57004 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Yamaguchi, H

    T. Yamaguchi, H. Kohno, and R. A. Duine, Microscopic theory of magnon-drag electron flow in ferromagnetic metals, Phys. Rev. B99, 094425 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    J. Endo, H. Matsuura, and M. Ogata, Effect of param- agnon drag on thermoelectric transport properties: Lin- ear response theory, Phys. Rev. B105, 045101 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    L. E. Gurevich, Thermoelectric properties of conductors. I, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.16, 193 (1946)

    1946

  56. [64]

    Gurevich and O

    Y. Gurevich and O. Mashkevich, The electron-phonon drag and transport phenomena in semiconductors, Physics Reports181, 327 (1989)

    1989

  57. [65]

    L. V. Keldysh, Phonon wind and dimensions of electron- hole drops in semiconductors, JETP Lett.23, 86 (1976)

    1976

  58. [66]

    A. V. Kimel, A. M. Kalashnikova, A. Pogrebna, and A. K. Zvezdin, Fundamentals and perspectives of ul- trafast photoferroic recording, Physics Reports852, 1 (2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    A. M. Kalashnikova, N. E. Khokhlov, L. A. Shelukhin, and A. V. Scherbakov, Ultrafast laser-induced control of magnetic anisotropy in nanostructures, Technical Physics 67, 2335 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Varela-Manjarres, Y

    J. Varela-Manjarres, Y. Ren, and B. K. Nikolic, Ultra- fast optical excitation of magnons in 2D antiferromag- nets via spin torque exerted by photocurrent of excitons: Signatures in charge pumping and THz emission, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2507.02793 (2025). 18 Appendix A: Magno...

    2025

  61. [69]

    Even mode We look for the solution in a form θ(z) =Acos ˜kz,|z|< L/2,(B9a) θ(z) =Be −k(|z|−L/2).(B9b) The boundary condition (B4a) gives B=Acos ˜kL 2 ,(B10) while the boundary contition (B4b) gives −(1 + 4πχzz )˜kAsin ˜kL 2 =−kB.(B11) The dispersion relation is k= (1 + 4πχ zz ...

  62. [70]

    short-range

    Odd mode We look for the solution in form θ(z) =Asin ˜kz,|z|< L/2,(B15a) θ(z) = sign(z)Be −k(|z|−L/2).(B15b) The boundary condition (B4a) gives B=Asin ˜kL 2 ,(B16) while the boundary condition (B4b) gives (1 + 4πχzz )˜kAcos ˜kL 2 =−kB.(B17) The dispersion relation is ktan ˜kL ...

  63. [71]

    Scattering Magnon masses are much higher, than exciton mass. The collision integral is QM sc gX , gM = 4× 2π ℏ |2V| 2 × 1 S 2 X p,q δ EX k +E M p −E X k+q −E M p−q × gX (k+q) gM 0 (p) + 1 δg M (p−q) +g X (k+q)δg M (p)gM 0 (p−q) −g X (k)δg M (p) gM 0 (p−q) + 1 −gX (k)gM 0 (p)δg...

  64. [72]

    Two-magnon absorption The collision integral in the same approximations gives QM abs gX , gM = 4× 2π ℏ |V| 2 × 1 S 2 X p,q δ(E X k +E M p +E M −p+q −E X k+q) × gX (k+q) gM 0 (p) + 1 δg M (−p+q) +g X (k+q)δg M (p) gM 0 (−p+q) + 1 −g X (k)gM 0 (p)δg M (−p+q) −gX (k)δg M (p)g0(−p...

  65. [73]

    Two-magnon emission The collision integral in the same approximations gives QM em gX , gM = 4× 2π ℏ |V| 2 × 1 S 2 X p,q δ(E X k −E M p −E M p−q −E X k+q) × gX (k+q)g M 0 (−p)δg M (p−q) +g X (k+q)δg M (−p)gM 0 (p−q) −g X (k) gM 0 (−p) + 1 δg M (p−q) −gX (k)δg M (−p) [g0(p−q) + ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.