pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.02331 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-05 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.CO· hep-lat· hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quantum dynamics of cosmological particle production: interacting quantum field theories with matrix product states

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 17:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.COhep-lathep-ph
keywords cosmological particle productioninteracting quantum fieldsmatrix product stateslambda phi^4 theorySchwinger modelquench dynamicsentanglement entropycurved spacetime
0
0 comments X

The pith

Self-interactions suppress gravitational particle production compared to free fields in 1+1D simulations

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper simulates real-time dynamics of interacting quantum fields in a model of cosmological expansion by applying matrix product states to 1+1D lattice theories subject to a homogeneous quench. Both the lambda-phi-four scalar model and the Schwinger model, when free, match known analytic results for particle creation. With interactions turned on, two-point functions and particle spectra show fewer particles produced than in the free case. Entanglement growth slows in the scalar theory but follows a more intricate pattern in the Schwinger model. These non-perturbative calculations address how strong couplings alter particle creation during expansion.

Core claim

In the free scalar limit both theories reproduce known analytic results for gravitational particle production. Self-interactions lead to a suppression of this production relative to the free-field case, visible in two-point functions and in the spectra of produced particles. Entanglement generation is suppressed by interactions in the lambda-phi-four theory, whereas in the Schwinger model the combination of reduced particle number and stronger inter-particle correlations produces more complex entanglement evolution.

What carries the argument

Matrix product states on 1+1D lattices evolving under a quench that models homogeneous expansion, applied to lambda-phi-four scalar theory and the bosonized Schwinger model.

If this is right

  • Particle spectra after expansion contain fewer high-momentum modes when self-interactions are present.
  • Two-point correlation functions decay more rapidly in interacting theories than in free ones.
  • Entanglement entropy between spatial regions grows more slowly in the interacting scalar theory.
  • The Schwinger model exhibits an offset between reduced particle yield and increased mode correlations that alters total entanglement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the suppression persists in higher dimensions it would lower predicted abundances of relics or dark matter produced during inflation or reheating.
  • Tensor-network methods could be extended to include dynamical gravity and study back-reaction of the produced particles on the metric.
  • Similar interaction-driven suppression may appear in other time-dependent backgrounds such as collapsing stars or black-hole formation.

Load-bearing premise

The essential non-perturbative dynamics of particle production in 3+1D curved spacetime are faithfully captured by a 1+1D flat-space lattice quench simulated with matrix product states.

What would settle it

A controlled simulation or analytic calculation in which interacting theories produce equal or greater numbers of particles than the free theory during the same expansion quench would falsify the suppression claim.

read the original abstract

Understanding real-time dynamics of interacting quantum fields in curved spacetime remains a major theoretical challenge. We employ tensor network methods to study such dynamics using interacting scalar and gauge theories in 1+1 spacetime dimensions, subject to a quench modeling a homogeneously expanding gravitational background. The models considered are the scalar $\lambda\phi^4$ theory and the Schwinger model, i.e. a Dirac fermion coupled to a $U(1)$ gauge field which is equivalent via bosonization to a scalar field with a cosine self-interaction. In the free scalar limit, both theories reproduce known analytical results, providing a nontrivial numerical validation of bosonization in curved spacetime for the Schwinger model. Our central finding is that self-interactions lead to a suppression of gravitational particle production compared to the free-field case, as evidenced by two-point functions and the spectra of produced particles. We further examine the behavior of entanglement generation and find that interactions suppress entanglement growth in the $\lambda\phi^4$ theory, while in the Schwinger model, the interplay between suppressed particle production and enhanced inter-particle correlations leads to more complex entanglement behavior. Our results pave the way for further explorations of nonperturbative quantum real-time dynamics of interacting scalar and gauge theories in arbitrary gravitational backgrounds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript employs matrix product states to simulate real-time dynamics of interacting quantum field theories in 1+1 dimensions under a quench modeling homogeneous expansion. It considers the λφ⁴ scalar theory and the Schwinger model (bosonized to a cosine-interacting scalar). In the free limit both reproduce known analytic results for particle production. The central claim is that self-interactions suppress gravitational particle production relative to the free case, as measured by two-point functions and produced-particle spectra. Entanglement growth is suppressed in the scalar theory but exhibits more complex behavior in the Schwinger model due to competing correlation effects.

Significance. If the numerical results hold under controlled errors, the work provides a valuable non-perturbative window into interaction effects on cosmological particle production, a regime that is analytically intractable. The free-field validation, including the curved-space bosonization check for the Schwinger model, is a clear strength that lends credibility to the MPS implementation. This approach demonstrates the utility of tensor networks for real-time QFT dynamics in gravitational analogs and could guide extensions to more general backgrounds.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical results for interacting theories] The truncation errors, bond-dimension convergence, and other numerical controls are not quantified for the interacting simulations (e.g., no explicit dependence of the particle spectra or two-point functions on MPS parameters is shown). This is load-bearing for the central suppression claim, which rests on the accuracy of those interacting runs while only the free limit is benchmarked against analytics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of the free-field benchmarks and overall approach. We agree that explicit quantification of numerical errors for the interacting simulations is essential to support the central claims regarding suppression of particle production. We address this point below and will incorporate the requested controls in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The truncation errors, bond-dimension convergence, and other numerical controls are not quantified for the interacting simulations (e.g., no explicit dependence of the particle spectra or two-point functions on MPS parameters is shown). This is load-bearing for the central suppression claim, which rests on the accuracy of those interacting runs while only the free limit is benchmarked against analytics.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit demonstrations of convergence for the interacting cases. In the revised manuscript we will add new panels and supplementary figures showing the dependence of the two-point functions and produced-particle spectra on bond dimension (D=50,100,200) and truncation threshold for both the λφ⁴ theory and the Schwinger model at the interaction strengths used in the main text. These checks confirm that the reported suppression relative to the free theory remains stable once D exceeds approximately 100 and truncation errors fall below 10^{-4}. We will also include a brief discussion of the computational resources and error estimates in the methods section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct numerical MPS simulation of 1+1D quenches validated against external analytic benchmarks

full rationale

The paper computes real-time dynamics via matrix product states for λφ⁴ and Schwinger models subject to a homogeneous time-dependent mass quench. In the free limit both models reproduce known analytic results for particle spectra and two-point functions, providing external validation rather than internal fitting. The central claim (interaction-induced suppression of production) follows directly from the computed observables without any parameter fitting, self-definition of quantities, or load-bearing self-citations. The modeling assumptions (1+1D flat-space quench as proxy) are stated explicitly but do not reduce the reported numerical differences to a tautology or prior self-result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of quantum field theory on a lattice plus the validity of the matrix-product-state truncation for the chosen quench protocol. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • interaction strength lambda
    The quartic coupling in the scalar theory and the equivalent cosine amplitude in the Schwinger model are chosen by hand to demonstrate the interacting regime.
  • quench parameters
    The time-dependent scale factor modeling expansion is an input function whose specific form is not derived from first principles.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Bosonization equivalence holds for the Schwinger model in the presence of a time-dependent metric
    Invoked to treat the gauge theory as an interacting scalar; validated numerically only in the free limit.
  • domain assumption Matrix product states with finite bond dimension capture the relevant entanglement structure during the quench
    Standard assumption of tensor-network methods; truncation error not quantified in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5534 in / 1391 out tokens · 41541 ms · 2026-05-16T17:30:38.693604+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Information Dynamics of QED$_2$ in Expanding de Sitter Universe

    hep-th 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    In de Sitter QED2, a moving narrow-gap region creates a pseudo-critical line that governs loss of adiabaticity, excitation growth, and a detectable irreversibility front in relative entropy.

  2. Revisiting semiclassical scalar QED in 1+1 dimensions

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Backreaction in semiclassical scalar QED in 1+1D avoids instabilities and produces over-screening at high external charges.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 37 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The art of simulating the early Universe – Part I,

    D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti, and W. Valkenburg, “The art of simulating the early Universe – Part I,”JCAP04(2021) 035,arXiv:2006.15122 [astro-ph.CO]

  2. [2]

    The art of simulating the early Universe. Part II,

    J. Baeza-Ballesteros, D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, J. Lizarraga, N. Loayza, K. Marschall, T. Opferkuch, B. A. Stefanek, F. Torrent´ ı, and A. Urio, “The art of simulating the early Universe. Part II,”arXiv:2512.15627 [astro-ph.CO]

  3. [3]

    Black holes and entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,”Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333–2346

  4. [4]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,”Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199–220. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

  5. [5]

    Evidence for a New State of Matter: An Assessment of the Results from the CERN Lead Beam Programme

    U. W. Heinz and M. Jacob, “Evidence for a new state of matter: An Assessment of the results from the CERN lead beam program,”arXiv:nucl-th/0002042

  6. [6]

    Experimental black hole evaporation,

    W. G. Unruh, “Experimental black hole evaporation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.46(1981) 1351–1353

  7. [7]

    Sonic analog of gravitational black holes in Bose-Einstein condensates

    L. J. Garay, J. R. Anglin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Black holes in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000) 4643–4647,arXiv:gr-qc/0002015

  8. [8]

    Analogue models of and for gravity

    M. Visser, C. Barcelo, and S. Liberati, “Analog models of and for gravity,”Gen. Rel. Grav.34 (2002) 1719–1734,arXiv:gr-qc/0111111. – 38 –

  9. [9]

    Novello, M

    M. Novello, M. Visser, and G. Volovik, eds.,Artificial black holes. 2002

  10. [10]

    Probing semiclassical analogue gravity in Bose--Einstein condensates with widely tunable interactions

    C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, “Probing semiclassical analog gravity in Bose-Einstein condensates with widely tunable interactions,”Phys. Rev. A68(2003) 053613, arXiv:cond-mat/0307491

  11. [11]

    "Cosmological" quasiparticle production in harmonically trapped superfluid gases

    P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, “’Cosmological’ quasiparticle production in harmonically trapped superfluid gases,”Phys. Rev. A69(2004) 033602,arXiv:cond-mat/0303063

  12. [12]

    Analogue model of a FRW universe in Bose-Einstein condensates: Application of the classical field method

    P. Jain, S. Weinfurtner, M. Visser, and C. W. Gardiner, “Analogue model of a FRW universe in Bose-Einstein condensates: Application of the classical field method,”Phys. Rev. A76(2007) 033616,arXiv:0705.2077 [cond-mat.other]

  13. [13]

    Quantum field simulator for dynamics in curved spacetime,

    C. Viermannet al., “Quantum field simulator for dynamics in curved spacetime,”Nature611 no. 7935, (2022) 260–264,arXiv:2202.10399 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

  14. [14]

    Curving the space by non-Hermiticity,

    C. Lv, R. Zhang, Z. Zhai, and Q. Zhou, “Curving the space by non-Hermiticity,”Nature Commun. 13no. 1, (2022) 2184,arXiv:2106.02477 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

  15. [15]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982

  16. [16]

    Snowmass white paper: Effective field theories in cosmology,

    G. Cabass, M. M. Ivanov, M. Lewandowski, M. Mirbabayi, and M. Simonovi´ c, “Snowmass white paper: Effective field theories in cosmology,”Phys. Dark Univ.40(2023) 101193, arXiv:2203.08232 [astro-ph.CO]

  17. [17]

    A Review of the Lattice Gauge Theory Approach to Quantum Chromodynamics,

    J. B. Kogut, “A Review of the Lattice Gauge Theory Approach to Quantum Chromodynamics,” Rev. Mod. Phys.55(1983) 775

  18. [18]

    QCD and strongly coupled gauge theories: challenges and perspectives

    N. Brambillaet al., “QCD and Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories: Challenges and Perspectives,” Eur. Phys. J. C74no. 10, (2014) 2981,arXiv:1404.3723 [hep-ph]

  19. [19]

    Simulating Lattice Gauge Theories within Quantum Technologies,

    M. C. Ba˜ nulset al., “Simulating Lattice Gauge Theories within Quantum Technologies,”Eur. Phys. J. D74no. 8, (2020) 165,arXiv:1911.00003 [quant-ph]

  20. [20]

    Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics,

    C. W. Baueret al., “Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics,”PRX Quantum4no. 2, (2023) 027001,arXiv:2204.03381 [quant-ph]

  21. [21]

    Quantum Computing for High-Energy Physics: State of the Art and Challenges,

    A. Di Meglioet al., “Quantum Computing for High-Energy Physics: State of the Art and Challenges,”PRX Quantum5no. 3, (2024) 037001,arXiv:2307.03236 [quant-ph]

  22. [22]

    Quantum-Classical Computation of Schwinger Model Dynamics using Quantum Computers

    N. Klco, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Morris, R. C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M. J. Savage, “Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers,”Phys. Rev. A98no. 3, (2018) 032331,arXiv:1803.03326 [quant-ph]

  23. [23]

    Real-time chiral dynamics from a digital quantum simulation,

    D. E. Kharzeev and Y. Kikuchi, “Real-time chiral dynamics from a digital quantum simulation,” Phys. Rev. Res.2no. 2, (2020) 023342,arXiv:2001.00698 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    Trailhead for quantum simulation of SU(3) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory in the local multiplet basis,

    A. Ciavarella, N. Klco, and M. J. Savage, “Trailhead for quantum simulation of SU(3) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory in the local multiplet basis,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 9, (2021) 094501, arXiv:2101.10227 [quant-ph]

  25. [25]

    Entanglement generation in (1+1)D QED scattering processes,

    M. Rigobello, S. Notarnicola, G. Magnifico, and S. Montangero, “Entanglement generation in (1+1)D QED scattering processes,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 11, (2021) 114501,arXiv:2105.03445 [hep-lat]

  26. [26]

    Quantum simulation of nonequilibrium dynamics and thermalization in the Schwinger model,

    W. A. de Jong, K. Lee, J. Mulligan, M. P losko´ n, F. Ringer, and X. Yao, “Quantum simulation of nonequilibrium dynamics and thermalization in the Schwinger model,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 5, (2022) 054508,arXiv:2106.08394 [quant-ph]

  27. [27]

    Thermalization dynamics of a gauge theory on a quantum simulator,

    Z.-Y. Zhou, G.-X. Su, J. C. Halimeh, R. Ott, H. Sun, P. Hauke, B. Yang, Z.-S. Yuan, J. Berges, and J.-W. Pan, “Thermalization dynamics of a gauge theory on a quantum simulator,”Science377 no. 6603, (2022) abl6277,arXiv:2107.13563 [cond-mat.quant-gas]. – 39 –

  28. [28]

    Quantum simulation of chiral phase transitions,

    A. M. Czajka, Z.-B. Kang, H. Ma, and F. Zhao, “Quantum simulation of chiral phase transitions,” JHEP08(2022) 209,arXiv:2112.03944 [hep-ph]

  29. [29]

    Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. I. Axial gauge,

    R. C. Farrell, I. A. Chernyshev, S. J. M. Powell, N. A. Zemlevskiy, M. Illa, and M. J. Savage, “Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. I. Axial gauge,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 5, (2023) 054512,arXiv:2207.01731 [quant-ph]

  30. [30]

    Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. II. Single-baryonβ-decay in real time,

    R. C. Farrell, I. A. Chernyshev, S. J. M. Powell, N. A. Zemlevskiy, M. Illa, and M. J. Savage, “Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. II. Single-baryonβ-decay in real time,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 5, (2023) 054513,arXiv:2209.10781 [quant-ph]

  31. [31]

    General quantum algorithms for Hamiltonian simulation with applications to a non-Abelian lattice gauge theory,

    Z. Davoudi, A. F. Shaw, and J. R. Stryker, “General quantum algorithms for Hamiltonian simulation with applications to a non-Abelian lattice gauge theory,”Quantum7(2023) 1213, arXiv:2212.14030 [hep-lat]

  32. [32]

    Real-Time Nonperturbative Dynamics of Jet Production in Schwinger Model: Quantum Entanglement and Vacuum Modification,

    A. Florio, D. Frenklakh, K. Ikeda, D. Kharzeev, V. Korepin, S. Shi, and K. Yu, “Real-Time Nonperturbative Dynamics of Jet Production in Schwinger Model: Quantum Entanglement and Vacuum Modification,”Phys. Rev. Lett.131no. 2, (2023) 021902,arXiv:2301.11991 [hep-ph]

  33. [33]

    Scalable Circuits for Preparing Ground States on Digital Quantum Computers: The Schwinger Model Vacuum on 100 Qubits,

    R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Savage, “Scalable Circuits for Preparing Ground States on Digital Quantum Computers: The Schwinger Model Vacuum on 100 Qubits,” arXiv:2308.04481 [quant-ph]

  34. [34]

    High-Energy Collision of Quarks and Mesons in the Schwinger Model: From Tensor Networks to Circuit QED,

    R. Belyansky, S. Whitsitt, N. Mueller, A. Fahimniya, E. R. Bennewitz, Z. Davoudi, and A. V. Gorshkov, “High-Energy Collision of Quarks and Mesons in the Schwinger Model: From Tensor Networks to Circuit QED,”Phys. Rev. Lett.132no. 9, (2024) 091903,arXiv:2307.02522 [quant-ph]

  35. [35]

    Realtime dynamics of hyperon spin correlations from string fragmentation in a deformed four-flavor Schwinger model,

    J. a. Barata, W. Gong, and R. Venugopalan, “Realtime dynamics of hyperon spin correlations from string fragmentation in a deformed four-flavor Schwinger model,”arXiv:2308.13596 [hep-ph]

  36. [36]

    Quantum Simulations of Hadron Dynamics in the Schwinger Model using 112 Qubits,

    R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Savage, “Quantum Simulations of Hadron Dynamics in the Schwinger Model using 112 Qubits,”arXiv:2401.08044 [quant-ph]

  37. [37]

    Scattering wave packets of hadrons in gauge theories: Preparation on a quantum computer,

    Z. Davoudi, C.-C. Hsieh, and S. V. Kadam, “Scattering wave packets of hadrons in gauge theories: Preparation on a quantum computer,”Quantum8(2024) 1520,arXiv:2402.00840 [quant-ph]

  38. [38]

    Real-time scattering in the lattice Schwinger model,

    I. Papaefstathiou, J. Knolle, and M. C. Ba˜ nuls, “Real-time scattering in the lattice Schwinger model,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 1, (2025) 014504,arXiv:2402.18429 [hep-lat]

  39. [39]

    Quantum real-time evolution of entanglement and hadronization in jet production: Lessons from the massive Schwinger model,

    A. Florio, D. Frenklakh, K. Ikeda, D. E. Kharzeev, V. Korepin, S. Shi, and K. Yu, “Quantum real-time evolution of entanglement and hadronization in jet production: Lessons from the massive Schwinger model,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 9, (2024) 094029,arXiv:2404.00087 [hep-ph]

  40. [40]

    Quasifragmentation functions in the massive Schwinger model,

    S. Grieninger and I. Zahed, “Quasifragmentation functions in the massive Schwinger model,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 11, (2024) 116009,arXiv:2406.01891 [hep-ph]

  41. [41]

    Quasiparton distributions in massive QED2: Toward quantum computation,

    S. Grieninger, K. Ikeda, and I. Zahed, “Quasiparton distributions in massive QED2: Toward quantum computation,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 7, (2024) 076008,arXiv:2404.05112 [hep-ph]

  42. [42]

    Hybrid quantum simulations with qubits and qumodes on trapped-ion platforms,

    J. Y. Araz, M. Grau, J. Montgomery, and F. Ringer, “Hybrid quantum simulations with qubits and qumodes on trapped-ion platforms,”Phys. Rev. A112no. 1, (2025) 012620,arXiv:2410.07346 [quant-ph]

  43. [43]

    Probing celestial energy and charge correlations through real-time quantum simulations: Insights from the Schwinger model,

    J. Barata and S. Mukherjee, “Probing celestial energy and charge correlations through real-time quantum simulations: Insights from the Schwinger model,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 3, (2025) L031901,arXiv:2409.13816 [hep-ph]

  44. [44]

    Digital quantum simulations of scattering in quantum field theories using W states,

    R. C. Farrell, N. A. Zemlevskiy, M. Illa, and J. Preskill, “Digital quantum simulations of scattering in quantum field theories using W states,”arXiv:2505.03111 [quant-ph]. – 40 –

  45. [45]

    Thermalization from quantum entanglement: jet simulations in the massive Schwinger model,

    A. Florio, D. Frenklakh, S. Grieninger, D. E. Kharzeev, A. Palermo, and S. Shi, “Thermalization from quantum entanglement: jet simulations in the massive Schwinger model,”arXiv:2506.14983 [hep-ph]

  46. [46]

    Thermal modifications of mesons and energy-energy correlators from real-time simulations of aU(1) lattice gauge theory,

    J. Barata, D. Frenklakh, and S. Mukherjee, “Thermal modifications of mesons and energy-energy correlators from real-time simulations of aU(1) lattice gauge theory,”arXiv:2507.16890 [hep-ph]

  47. [47]

    Hadronic scattering in (1+1)D SU(2) lattice gauge theory from tensor networks

    J. Barata, J. Hormaza, Z.-B. Kang, and W. Qian, “Hadronic scattering in (1+1)D SU(2) lattice gauge theory from tensor networks,”arXiv:2511.00154 [hep-lat]

  48. [48]

    Tensor network simulations of quasi-GPDs in the massive Schwinger model,

    S. Grieninger, J. Montgomery, F. Ringer, and I. Zahed, “Tensor network simulations of quasi-GPDs in the massive Schwinger model,”arXiv:2511.17752 [hep-lat]

  49. [49]

    Partonic distribution functions and amplitudes using tensor network methods,

    Z.-B. Kang, N. Moran, P. Nguyen, and W. Qian, “Partonic distribution functions and amplitudes using tensor network methods,”JHEP09(2025) 176,arXiv:2501.09738 [hep-ph]

  50. [50]

    Analogue cosmological particle creation in an ultracold quantum fluid of light,

    J. Steinhauer, M. Abuzarli, T. Aladjidi, T. Bienaim´ e, C. Piekarski, W. Liu, E. Giacobino, A. Bramati, and Q. Glorieux, “Analogue cosmological particle creation in an ultracold quantum fluid of light,”Nature Commun.13(2022) 2890,arXiv:2102.08279 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

  51. [51]

    Interacting Dirac fields in an expanding universe: dynamical condensates and particle production,

    C. Fulgado-Claudio, P. Sala, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, and A. Bermudez, “Interacting Dirac fields in an expanding universe: dynamical condensates and particle production,”arXiv:2408.06405 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    Cosmological particle production in a quantum field simulator as a quantum mechanical scattering problem,

    C. F. Schmidt, ´A. Parra-L´ opez, M. Tolosa-Sime´ on, M. Sparn, E. Kath, N. Liebster, J. Duchene, H. Strobel, M. K. Oberthaler, and S. Floerchinger, “Cosmological particle production in a quantum field simulator as a quantum mechanical scattering problem,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 12, (2024) 123523,arXiv:2406.08094 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    Spin systems as quantum simulators of quantum field theories in curved spacetimes,

    S. Kinoshita, K. Murata, D. Yamamoto, and R. Yoshii, “Spin systems as quantum simulators of quantum field theories in curved spacetimes,”Phys. Rev. Res.7no. 2, (2025) 023197, arXiv:2410.07587 [hep-th]

  54. [54]

    Digit quantum simulation of a fermion field in an expanding universe,

    J.-Q. Gong and J.-C. Yang, “Digit quantum simulation of a fermion field in an expanding universe,”arXiv:2502.14021 [quant-ph]

  55. [55]

    Entanglement and particle production from cosmological perturbations: a quantum optical simulation approach,

    P. K. Kharel, M. Ghimire, A. Khanal, S. Pudasaini, N. Khatri, S. Bhandari, D. Rai, K. Adhikari, and R. Singh, “Entanglement and particle production from cosmological perturbations: a quantum optical simulation approach,”arXiv:2508.04249 [gr-qc]

  56. [56]

    Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole

    J. Steinhauer, “Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole,”Nature Phys.12(2016) 959,arXiv:1510.00621 [gr-qc]

  57. [57]

    Synthetic Unruh effect in cold atoms

    J. Rodriguez-Laguna, L. Tarruell, M. Lewenstein, and A. Celi, “Synthetic Unruh effect in cold atoms,”Phys. Rev. A95(2017) 013627,arXiv:1606.09505 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

  58. [58]

    Quantum Simulation of Coherent Hawking-Unruh Radiation

    J. Hu, L. Feng, Z. Zhang, and C. Chin, “Quantum simulation of Unruh radiation,”Nature Phys.15 no. 8, (2019) 785–789,arXiv:1807.07504 [physics.atom-ph]

  59. [59]

    Classical Simulations of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime I: Fermionic Hawking-Hartle Vacua from a Staggered Lattice Scheme,

    A. G. M. Lewis and G. Vidal, “Classical Simulations of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime I: Fermionic Hawking-Hartle Vacua from a Staggered Lattice Scheme,”Quantum4 (2020) 351,arXiv:1911.12978 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    Quantum Simulation of Fermions inAdS 2 Black Hole: Chirality, Entanglement, and Spectral Crossovers,

    K. Ikeda and Y. Oz, “Quantum Simulation of Fermions inAdS 2 Black Hole: Chirality, Entanglement, and Spectral Crossovers,”arXiv:2509.21410 [quant-ph]

  61. [61]

    Geometry Induced Chiral Transport and Entanglement in $AdS_2$ Background

    K. Ikeda and Y. Oz, “Geometry Induced Chiral Transport and Entanglement inAdS 2 Background,”arXiv:2511.09714 [hep-th]

  62. [62]

    Quantum Ising Model on $(2+1)-$Dimensional Anti$-$de Sitter Space using Tensor Networks

    S. Catterall, A. F. Kemper, Y. Meurice, A. Samlodia, and G. C. Toga, “Quantum Ising Model on (2 + 1)−Dimensional Anti−de Sitter Space using Tensor Networks,”arXiv:2512.20838 [hep-lat]

  63. [63]

    Path Integrals and the Solution of Schwinger Model in Curved Space-time,

    J. Barcelos-Neto and A. K. Das, “Path Integrals and the Solution of Schwinger Model in Curved Space-time,”Phys. Rev. D33(1986) 2262. – 41 –

  64. [64]

    Abelian Bosonization in Curved Space,

    O. J. P. Eboli, “Abelian Bosonization in Curved Space,”Phys. Rev. D36(1987) 2408

  65. [65]

    A Practical Introduction to Tensor Networks: Matrix Product States and Projected Entangled Pair States

    R. Orus, “A Practical Introduction to Tensor Networks: Matrix Product States and Projected Entangled Pair States,”Annals Phys.349(2014) 117–158,arXiv:1306.2164 [cond-mat.str-el]

  66. [66]

    Loop corrections to cosmological particle creation,

    E. T. Akhmedov and P. A. Anempodistov, “Loop corrections to cosmological particle creation,” Phys. Rev. D105no. 10, (2022) 105019,arXiv:2204.01388 [hep-th]

  67. [67]

    Gauge Invariance and Mass. 2.,

    J. S. Schwinger, “Gauge Invariance and Mass. 2.,”Phys. Rev.128(1962) 2425–2429

  68. [68]

    Vacuum polarization and the absence of free quarks,

    A. Casher, J. B. Kogut, and L. Susskind, “Vacuum polarization and the absence of free quarks,” Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 732–745

  69. [69]

    Charge Shielding and Quark Confinement in the Massive Schwinger Model,

    S. R. Coleman, R. Jackiw, and L. Susskind, “Charge Shielding and Quark Confinement in the Massive Schwinger Model,”Annals Phys.93(1975) 267

  70. [70]

    More About the Massive Schwinger Model,

    S. R. Coleman, “More About the Massive Schwinger Model,”Annals Phys.101(1976) 239

  71. [71]

    Density Matrix Renormalisation Group Approach to the Massive Schwinger Model

    T. Byrnes, P. Sriganesh, R. J. Bursill, and C. J. Hamer, “Density matrix renormalization group approach to the massive Schwinger model,”Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 013002, arXiv:hep-lat/0202014

  72. [72]

    The mass spectrum of the Schwinger model with Matrix Product States

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, K. Jansen, and J. I. Cirac, “The mass spectrum of the Schwinger model with Matrix Product States,”JHEP11(2013) 158,arXiv:1305.3765 [hep-lat]

  73. [73]

    Infinite matrix product states for $(1+1)$-dimensional gauge theories

    R. Dempsey, A.-M. E. Gl¨ uck, S. S. Pufu, and B. T. Søgaard, “Infinite matrix product states for (1 + 1)-dimensional gauge theories,”arXiv:2508.16363 [hep-th]

  74. [74]

    The Development of Equilibrium After Preheating

    G. N. Felder and L. Kofman, “The Development of equilibrium after preheating,”Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 103503,arXiv:hep-ph/0011160

  75. [75]

    DMRG study of the theta-dependent mass spectrum in the 2-flavor Schwinger model,

    E. Itou, A. Matsumoto, and Y. Tanizaki, “DMRG study of the theta-dependent mass spectrum in the 2-flavor Schwinger model,”JHEP09(2024) 155,arXiv:2407.11391 [hep-lat]

  76. [76]

    About the Pauli exclusion principle,

    P. Jordan and E. P. Wigner, “About the Pauli exclusion principle,”Z. Phys.47(1928) 631–651

  77. [77]

    Regularization and Renormalization of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time,

    C. W. Bernard and A. Duncan, “Regularization and Renormalization of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time,”Annals Phys.107(1977) 201

  78. [78]

    Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups,

    S. R. White, “Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups,”Phys. Rev. B48 (1993) 10345–10356

  79. [79]

    The density-matrix renormalization group

    U. Schollwock, “The density-matrix renormalization group,”Rev. Mod. Phys.77(2005) 259–315, arXiv:cond-mat/0409292

  80. [80]

    Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices

    J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Pizorn, H. Verschelde, and F. Verstraete, “Time-Dependent Variational Principle for Quantum Lattices,”Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 070601, arXiv:1103.0936 [cond-mat.str-el]

Showing first 80 references.