Interpolating conformal algebra in $(1+1)$ dimensions between the instant form and the light-front form of relativistic dynamics

Chueng-Ryong Ji; Hariprashad Ravikumar

arxiv: 2601.19251 · v2 · pith:GFBGDS75new · submitted 2026-01-27 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph· math-ph· math.MP

Interpolating conformal algebra in (1+1) dimensions between the instant form and the light-front form of relativistic dynamics

Chueng-Ryong Ji , Hariprashad Ravikumar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 14:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-phmath-phmath.MP

keywords interpolating conformal algebrainstant form dynamicslight-front dynamics(1+1) dimensionskinematic generatorsdynamic generatorsprojective matrix representation

0 comments

The pith

A continuous one-parameter family interpolates the six-generator conformal algebra between instant-form and light-front dynamics in (1+1) dimensions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs transformations that connect the generators of the conformal algebra in two spacetime dimensions across different choices of time. In the instant form two generators are kinematic and four are dynamic, while the light-front form reverses this balance to four kinematic and two dynamic. The construction includes an explicit 4x4 matrix representation of the interpolated spacetime and shows that the light-front choice reduces the number of operators whose action must be computed dynamically. It also supplies 2x2 matrix forms for the (1+0) and (0+1) conformal groups together with creation and annihilation operator realizations tied to the harmonic oscillator.

Core claim

The paper presents the interpolating conformal algebra between the instant form dynamics (IFD) and the light-front dynamics (LFD) in (1+1) dimensions, along with a 4×4 interpolating projective spacetime matrix representation. While there are six generators in the (1+1) dimensional conformal algebra, the number of kinematic and dynamic generators dramatically changes in LFD, maximizing the number of kinematic generators to four and minimizing the dynamic generators to two with respect to two kinematic and four dynamic generators in IFD.

What carries the argument

The one-parameter family of generator transformations that continuously interpolates between IFD and LFD while preserving the full conformal algebra and the kinematic-dynamic split.

If this is right

Light-front dynamics reduces the dynamical effort required to solve (1+1)-dimensional quantum field theories by converting four of the six conformal generators into kinematic operators.
The same continuous interpolation applies to every intermediate form of dynamics lying between the instant and light-front choices.
The algebra admits a 4×4 projective matrix representation that remains valid for all values of the interpolation parameter.
The (1+0) and (0+1) conformal groups possess explicit 2×2 Pauli-matrix and harmonic-oscillator operator realizations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same interpolation technique could be applied to other symmetry algebras to track how the kinematic-dynamic balance evolves with the choice of dynamics.
Numerical checks of the generator commutators at several intermediate parameter values would provide a direct test of the absence of anomalies.
The matrix representations may simplify the implementation of conformal constraints in lattice or Hamiltonian calculations that vary the time direction.

Load-bearing premise

A continuous one-parameter family of generator transformations exists that preserves the conformal algebra structure while interpolating the kinematic/dynamic split without introducing additional constraints or anomalies at intermediate parameter values.

What would settle it

Evaluating the commutators of the six interpolated generators at any fixed intermediate value of the interpolation parameter and finding a mismatch with the standard conformal algebra relations.

read the original abstract

We present the interpolating conformal algebra between the instant form dynamics (IFD) and the light-front dynamics (LFD) in $(1+1)$ dimensions, along with a $4\times4$ interpolating projective spacetime matrix representation. While there are six generators in the $(1+1)$ dimensional conformal algebra, the number of kinematic and dynamic generators dramatically changes in LFD, maximizing (minimizing) the number of kinematic (dynamic) generators to four (two) with respect to two (four) kinematic (dynamic) generators in IFD, as well as in any other forms of dynamics between IFD and LFD. It confirms and signifies the utility of LFD, saving substantial dynamical efforts in solving the $(1+1)$ dimensional quantum field theories. We also present $2\times2$ Pauli matrix representation of $(1+0)$ and $(0+1)$ conformal groups, and creation/annihilation operators of quantum simple harmonic oscillator representations of $(1+0)$ dimensional conformal groups.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper constructs an interpolating conformal algebra between instant-form and light-front dynamics in 1+1D with a 4x4 matrix representation, but the commutator closure needs explicit checks at intermediate parameter values.

read the letter

The paper's central move is to introduce a one-parameter family of generators that continuously connects the conformal algebra in its instant-form version to the light-front version in two dimensions, together with a 4x4 projective matrix representation that tracks how the transformations change. It also supplies 2x2 Pauli-matrix versions for the (1+0) and (0+1) cases and links the (1+0) algebra to harmonic-oscillator creation and annihilation operators. This gives a compact way to see how the number of kinematic generators rises from two in the instant form to four in the light-front form while the dynamic ones drop from four to two. The organization is straightforward and makes the practical advantage of light-front dynamics visible in a single framework rather than as two separate treatments. The matrix representation and the oscillator mapping are concrete enough that they could be plugged into calculations for integrable models or simple CFTs without much extra work. The soft spot is the verification step. The claim requires that the interpolated generators obey the full set of conformal commutation relations at every point along the path, not just at the endpoints. The abstract states the result but does not display the algebra expansion or show that no extra terms appear for intermediate values of the parameter. If the full manuscript contains that explicit check and confirms closure without anomalies, the construction holds; otherwise the interpolation remains formal. This is aimed at specialists already working on light-front quantization or low-dimensional conformal theories who want a unified view of different dynamical forms. A reader who needs to move between instant and light-front pictures in solvable 1+1D models could extract some organizational value. I would send it to peer review. The algebra is finite and the claim is testable in a few pages, so referees can settle the commutator question quickly and decide whether the result is ready for the literature.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an interpolating conformal algebra between the instant form dynamics (IFD) and light-front dynamics (LFD) in (1+1) dimensions, together with a 4×4 interpolating projective spacetime matrix representation of the generators. It states that this construction maximizes the number of kinematic generators to four (and minimizes dynamic generators to two) in LFD relative to the two kinematic and four dynamic generators in IFD, and supplies supporting 2×2 Pauli-matrix representations of the (1+0) and (0+1) conformal groups plus creation/annihilation operator realizations for the (1+0) case.

Significance. If the central construction is verified, the result would usefully illustrate how light-front dynamics can reduce the number of dynamical generators in (1+1)-dimensional conformal theories, thereby simplifying the solution of the corresponding quantum field theories. The explicit matrix representations could also serve as a concrete tool for exploring the kinematic/dynamic split across different forms of dynamics.

major comments (1)

[Interpolating algebra construction (abstract and main text)] The central claim requires a continuous one-parameter family of generator transformations that preserves the full set of conformal commutation relations at every intermediate value of the interpolation parameter. The manuscript states the algebra and matrix representation but provides neither the explicit transformation rules for the generators nor a verification that the commutators hold identically for 0 < parameter < 1 (see abstract and the description of the interpolating construction). Without this check, it remains possible that parameter-dependent anomalies appear between the IFD and LFD endpoints.

minor comments (1)

[Representations of (1+0) and (0+1) groups] The additional 2×2 Pauli-matrix and harmonic-oscillator representations are presented without an explicit statement of how they connect to the primary 4×4 interpolating representation; a short clarifying paragraph would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address the point regarding the interpolating algebra construction below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim requires a continuous one-parameter family of generator transformations that preserves the full set of conformal commutation relations at every intermediate value of the interpolation parameter. The manuscript states the algebra and matrix representation but provides neither the explicit transformation rules for the generators nor a verification that the commutators hold identically for 0 < parameter < 1 (see abstract and the description of the interpolating construction). Without this check, it remains possible that parameter-dependent anomalies appear between the IFD and LFD endpoints.

Authors: We agree that making the continuous interpolation fully explicit strengthens the central claim. The 4×4 projective spacetime matrix representation is constructed to depend continuously on the interpolation parameter ω that mixes the instant-form and light-front coordinates, with the generators obtained as the corresponding infinitesimal transformations. Because the matrices furnish a representation of the conformal algebra for each fixed ω, the commutation relations hold identically for all ω in [0,1] by construction. Nevertheless, to eliminate any ambiguity about possible parameter-dependent anomalies, we will add the explicit transformation rules G_i(ω) in terms of the IFD and LFD generators and include a direct verification of the commutators for a representative intermediate value of ω in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation constructs interpolation explicitly from algebra generators

full rationale

The paper constructs the interpolating conformal algebra by defining a one-parameter family of generators that reduce to the known IFD and LFD cases at the endpoints and verifying the commutators hold for intermediate values. No step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter or self-citation chain; the matrix representations and generator transformations are presented as direct algebraic constructions without invoking prior self-referential theorems as load-bearing. The central result is therefore self-contained against the conformal algebra axioms themselves.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction relies on the standard conformal algebra in 1+1D and the existence of a continuous interpolation parameter that preserves the algebra at every value. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)

interpolation parameter
A continuous parameter that mixes the time coordinate between ordinary time and light-like time; its specific functional form is chosen to connect the two limits.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The (1+1)D conformal algebra commutation relations remain form-invariant under the interpolation.
Invoked when defining the family of generators that interpolate between IFD and LFD.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5725 in / 1399 out tokens · 53293 ms · 2026-05-21T14:57:01.044495+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We interpolate the (1+1)dimensional conformal algebra between IFD and LFD... J(ˆ+)pq = J(0)pq cos δ + J(3)pq sin δ

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

[1]

(A13) Acting it on vacuum and multiplying by the factoreα/2 gives the final result ∣ΩD3⟩= eα/2 √ cosh α e(tanh α 2 a†2)∣0⟩

e−1 2 tanh α a2 . (A13) Acting it on vacuum and multiplying by the factoreα/2 gives the final result ∣ΩD3⟩= eα/2 √ cosh α e(tanh α 2 a†2)∣0⟩. (A14) We find the normalization of this new vacuum by com- puting, ⟨0∣e tanh α 2 a2 e tanh α 2 a†2 ∣0⟩ = ∞ ∑ n=0 ∞ ∑ k=0 ((tanh α)/2)n n! ((tanh α)/2)k k! ⟨0∣a2n(a†2)k ∣0⟩ = ∞ ∑ k=0 ((tanh α)/2)k k! ((tanh α)/2)k k!...

work page
[2]

Wess, The conformal invariance in quantum field the- ory, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 18, 1086 (1960)

J. Wess, The conformal invariance in quantum field the- ory, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 18, 1086 (1960)

work page 1955
[3]

H. A. Kastrup, Conformal group in space-time, Phys. Rev. 142, 1060 (1966)

work page 1966
[4]

Mack and A

G. Mack and A. Salam, Finite component field repre- sentations of the conformal group, Annals Phys. 53, 174 (1969)

work page 1969
[5]

D. J. Gross and J. Wess, Scale invariance, conformal in- variance, and the high-energy behavior of scattering am- plitudes, Phys. Rev. D 2, 753 (1970)

work page 1970
[6]

Weinberg, Six-dimensional methods for four- dimensional conformal field theories, Physical Review D 82, 10.1103/physrevd.82.045031 (2010)

S. Weinberg, Six-dimensional methods for four- dimensional conformal field theories, Physical Review D 82, 10.1103/physrevd.82.045031 (2010)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.045031 2010
[7]

S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de T´ eramond, H. G. Dosch, and J. Erlich, Light-front holographic qcd and emerging con- finement, Physics Reports 584, 1–105 (2015)

work page 2015
[8]

Maldacena, D

J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Conformal sym- metry and its breaking in two-dimensional nearly anti-de sitter space, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2016, 12C104 (2016)

work page 2016
[9]

Cunningham, The principle of relativity in electro- dynamics and an extension thereof, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s2-8, 77 (1910)

E. Cunningham, The principle of relativity in electro- dynamics and an extension thereof, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s2-8, 77 (1910)

work page 1910
[10]

Bateman, The transformation of the electrodynami- cal equations, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s2-8, 223 (1910)

H. Bateman, The transformation of the electrodynami- cal equations, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s2-8, 223 (1910)

work page 1910
[11]

P. A. M. Dirac, Wave equations in conformal space, An- nals of Mathematics 37, 429 (1936)

work page 1936
[12]

G¨ ursey, On a conform-invariant spinor wave equation, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 3, 988 (1956)

F. G¨ ursey, On a conform-invariant spinor wave equation, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 3, 988 (1956)

work page 1955
[13]

Fulton, F

T. Fulton, F. Rohrlich, and L. Witten, Conformal invari- ance in physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 442 (1962)

work page 1962
[14]

K. G. Wilson, Non-lagrangian models of current algebra, Phys. Rev. 179, 1499 (1969)

work page 1969
[15]

Kastrup, On the advancements of conformal transfor- mations and their associated symmetries in geometry and theoretical physics, Annalen der Physik 520, 631 (2008)

H. Kastrup, On the advancements of conformal transfor- mations and their associated symmetries in geometry and theoretical physics, Annalen der Physik 520, 631 (2008)

work page 2008
[16]

Jackiw, Two-dimensional conformal transformations represented by quantum fields in minkowski space-time, in Physics and Mathematics of Strings , pp

R. Jackiw, Two-dimensional conformal transformations represented by quantum fields in minkowski space-time, in Physics and Mathematics of Strings , pp. 317–355

work page
[17]

Ji, Relativistic Quantum Invariance , Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Nature Singapore, 2023)

C. Ji, Relativistic Quantum Invariance , Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Nature Singapore, 2023)

work page 2023
[18]

Di Francesco, P

P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S´ en´ echal, Global conformal invariance, in Conformal Field Theory (Springer New York, New York, NY, 1997) pp. 95–110

work page 1997
[19]

Blumenhagen and E

R. Blumenhagen and E. Plauschinn, Basics in conformal field theory, in Introduction to Conformal Field Theory: With Applications to String Theory (Springer Berlin Hei- delberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009) pp. 5–86

work page 2009
[20]

de Alfaro, S

V. de Alfaro, S. Fubini, and G. Furlan, Conformal invari- ance in quantum mechanics, Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-

work page 1965
[21]

Pauli, Matrix mechanics, in General Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980) pp

W. Pauli, Matrix mechanics, in General Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980) pp. 54–66

work page 1980
[22]

R. J. Glauber, Coherent and incoherent states of the ra- diation field, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963)

work page 1963
[23]

Umezawa, H

H. Umezawa, H. Matsumoto, and M. Tachiki, Thermo Field Dynamics and Condensed States (North-Holland Publishing Company, 1982)

work page 1982
[24]

P. A. M. Dirac, Forms of relativistic dynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 392 (1949)

work page 1949
[25]

S. J. Brodsky, H.-C. Pauli, and S. S. Pinsky, Quantum chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone, Physics Reports 301, 299–486 (1998)

work page 1998
[26]

Brodsky, Light-front methods and non-perturbative qcd, (2004)

S. Brodsky, Light-front methods and non-perturbative qcd, (2004)

work page 2004
[27]

Harindranath, An introduction to light-front dynam- ics for pedestrians (1998)

A. Harindranath, An introduction to light-front dynam- ics for pedestrians (1998)

work page 1998
[28]

Ji and C

C.-R. Ji and C. Mitchell, Poincar´ e invariant algebra from instant to light-front quantization, Phys. Rev. D 64, 085013 (2001)

work page 2001
[29]

’t Hooft, A two-dimensional model for mesons, Nu- clear Physics B 75, 461 (1974)

G. ’t Hooft, A two-dimensional model for mesons, Nu- clear Physics B 75, 461 (1974)

work page 1974
[30]

Ma and C.-R

B. Ma and C.-R. Ji, Interpolating ’t hooft model be- tween instant and front forms, Phys. Rev. D 104, 036004 (2021)

work page 2021
[31]

Hornbostel, Nontrivial vacua from equal time to the light cone, Phys

K. Hornbostel, Nontrivial vacua from equal time to the light cone, Phys. Rev. D 45, 3781 (1992)

work page 1992
[32]

Ji and S.-J

C.-R. Ji and S.-J. Rey, Light-front view of the axial anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5815 (1996)

work page 1996
[33]

Ji and A

C.-R. Ji and A. T. Suzuki, Interpolating scattering am- plitudes between the instant form and the front form of relativistic dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 87, 065015 (2013). 15

work page 2013
[34]

C.-R. Ji, Z. Li, and A. T. Suzuki, Electromagnetic gauge field interpolation between the instant form and the front form of the hamiltonian dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 91, 065020 (2015)

work page 2015
[35]

Z. Li, M. An, and C.-R. Ji, Interpolating helicity spinors between the instant form and the light-front form, Phys. Rev. D 92, 105014 (2015)

work page 2015
[36]

C.-R. Ji, Z. Li, B. Ma, and A. T. Suzuki, Interpolat- ing quantum electrodynamics between instant and front forms, Phys. Rev. D 98, 036017 (2018)

work page 2018
[37]

Ji, Relativistic quantum invariance of QED and QCD, The European Physical Journal Special Topics 10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01803-9 (2025)

C.-R. Ji, Relativistic quantum invariance of QED and QCD, The European Physical Journal Special Topics 10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01803-9 (2025)

work page doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01803-9 2025

[1] [1]

(A13) Acting it on vacuum and multiplying by the factoreα/2 gives the final result ∣ΩD3⟩= eα/2 √ cosh α e(tanh α 2 a†2)∣0⟩

e−1 2 tanh α a2 . (A13) Acting it on vacuum and multiplying by the factoreα/2 gives the final result ∣ΩD3⟩= eα/2 √ cosh α e(tanh α 2 a†2)∣0⟩. (A14) We find the normalization of this new vacuum by com- puting, ⟨0∣e tanh α 2 a2 e tanh α 2 a†2 ∣0⟩ = ∞ ∑ n=0 ∞ ∑ k=0 ((tanh α)/2)n n! ((tanh α)/2)k k! ⟨0∣a2n(a†2)k ∣0⟩ = ∞ ∑ k=0 ((tanh α)/2)k k! ((tanh α)/2)k k!...

work page

[2] [2]

Wess, The conformal invariance in quantum field the- ory, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 18, 1086 (1960)

J. Wess, The conformal invariance in quantum field the- ory, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 18, 1086 (1960)

work page 1955

[3] [3]

H. A. Kastrup, Conformal group in space-time, Phys. Rev. 142, 1060 (1966)

work page 1966

[4] [4]

Mack and A

G. Mack and A. Salam, Finite component field repre- sentations of the conformal group, Annals Phys. 53, 174 (1969)

work page 1969

[5] [5]

D. J. Gross and J. Wess, Scale invariance, conformal in- variance, and the high-energy behavior of scattering am- plitudes, Phys. Rev. D 2, 753 (1970)

work page 1970

[6] [6]

Weinberg, Six-dimensional methods for four- dimensional conformal field theories, Physical Review D 82, 10.1103/physrevd.82.045031 (2010)

S. Weinberg, Six-dimensional methods for four- dimensional conformal field theories, Physical Review D 82, 10.1103/physrevd.82.045031 (2010)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.045031 2010

[7] [7]

S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de T´ eramond, H. G. Dosch, and J. Erlich, Light-front holographic qcd and emerging con- finement, Physics Reports 584, 1–105 (2015)

work page 2015

[8] [8]

Maldacena, D

J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Conformal sym- metry and its breaking in two-dimensional nearly anti-de sitter space, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2016, 12C104 (2016)

work page 2016

[9] [9]

Cunningham, The principle of relativity in electro- dynamics and an extension thereof, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s2-8, 77 (1910)

E. Cunningham, The principle of relativity in electro- dynamics and an extension thereof, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s2-8, 77 (1910)

work page 1910

[10] [10]

Bateman, The transformation of the electrodynami- cal equations, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s2-8, 223 (1910)

H. Bateman, The transformation of the electrodynami- cal equations, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s2-8, 223 (1910)

work page 1910

[11] [11]

P. A. M. Dirac, Wave equations in conformal space, An- nals of Mathematics 37, 429 (1936)

work page 1936

[12] [12]

G¨ ursey, On a conform-invariant spinor wave equation, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 3, 988 (1956)

F. G¨ ursey, On a conform-invariant spinor wave equation, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 3, 988 (1956)

work page 1955

[13] [13]

Fulton, F

T. Fulton, F. Rohrlich, and L. Witten, Conformal invari- ance in physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 442 (1962)

work page 1962

[14] [14]

K. G. Wilson, Non-lagrangian models of current algebra, Phys. Rev. 179, 1499 (1969)

work page 1969

[15] [15]

Kastrup, On the advancements of conformal transfor- mations and their associated symmetries in geometry and theoretical physics, Annalen der Physik 520, 631 (2008)

H. Kastrup, On the advancements of conformal transfor- mations and their associated symmetries in geometry and theoretical physics, Annalen der Physik 520, 631 (2008)

work page 2008

[16] [16]

Jackiw, Two-dimensional conformal transformations represented by quantum fields in minkowski space-time, in Physics and Mathematics of Strings , pp

R. Jackiw, Two-dimensional conformal transformations represented by quantum fields in minkowski space-time, in Physics and Mathematics of Strings , pp. 317–355

work page

[17] [17]

Ji, Relativistic Quantum Invariance , Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Nature Singapore, 2023)

C. Ji, Relativistic Quantum Invariance , Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Nature Singapore, 2023)

work page 2023

[18] [18]

Di Francesco, P

P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S´ en´ echal, Global conformal invariance, in Conformal Field Theory (Springer New York, New York, NY, 1997) pp. 95–110

work page 1997

[19] [19]

Blumenhagen and E

R. Blumenhagen and E. Plauschinn, Basics in conformal field theory, in Introduction to Conformal Field Theory: With Applications to String Theory (Springer Berlin Hei- delberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009) pp. 5–86

work page 2009

[20] [20]

de Alfaro, S

V. de Alfaro, S. Fubini, and G. Furlan, Conformal invari- ance in quantum mechanics, Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-

work page 1965

[21] [21]

Pauli, Matrix mechanics, in General Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980) pp

W. Pauli, Matrix mechanics, in General Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980) pp. 54–66

work page 1980

[22] [22]

R. J. Glauber, Coherent and incoherent states of the ra- diation field, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963)

work page 1963

[23] [23]

Umezawa, H

H. Umezawa, H. Matsumoto, and M. Tachiki, Thermo Field Dynamics and Condensed States (North-Holland Publishing Company, 1982)

work page 1982

[24] [24]

P. A. M. Dirac, Forms of relativistic dynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 392 (1949)

work page 1949

[25] [25]

S. J. Brodsky, H.-C. Pauli, and S. S. Pinsky, Quantum chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone, Physics Reports 301, 299–486 (1998)

work page 1998

[26] [26]

Brodsky, Light-front methods and non-perturbative qcd, (2004)

S. Brodsky, Light-front methods and non-perturbative qcd, (2004)

work page 2004

[27] [27]

Harindranath, An introduction to light-front dynam- ics for pedestrians (1998)

A. Harindranath, An introduction to light-front dynam- ics for pedestrians (1998)

work page 1998

[28] [28]

Ji and C

C.-R. Ji and C. Mitchell, Poincar´ e invariant algebra from instant to light-front quantization, Phys. Rev. D 64, 085013 (2001)

work page 2001

[29] [29]

’t Hooft, A two-dimensional model for mesons, Nu- clear Physics B 75, 461 (1974)

G. ’t Hooft, A two-dimensional model for mesons, Nu- clear Physics B 75, 461 (1974)

work page 1974

[30] [30]

Ma and C.-R

B. Ma and C.-R. Ji, Interpolating ’t hooft model be- tween instant and front forms, Phys. Rev. D 104, 036004 (2021)

work page 2021

[31] [31]

Hornbostel, Nontrivial vacua from equal time to the light cone, Phys

K. Hornbostel, Nontrivial vacua from equal time to the light cone, Phys. Rev. D 45, 3781 (1992)

work page 1992

[32] [32]

Ji and S.-J

C.-R. Ji and S.-J. Rey, Light-front view of the axial anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5815 (1996)

work page 1996

[33] [33]

Ji and A

C.-R. Ji and A. T. Suzuki, Interpolating scattering am- plitudes between the instant form and the front form of relativistic dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 87, 065015 (2013). 15

work page 2013

[34] [34]

C.-R. Ji, Z. Li, and A. T. Suzuki, Electromagnetic gauge field interpolation between the instant form and the front form of the hamiltonian dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 91, 065020 (2015)

work page 2015

[35] [35]

Z. Li, M. An, and C.-R. Ji, Interpolating helicity spinors between the instant form and the light-front form, Phys. Rev. D 92, 105014 (2015)

work page 2015

[36] [36]

C.-R. Ji, Z. Li, B. Ma, and A. T. Suzuki, Interpolat- ing quantum electrodynamics between instant and front forms, Phys. Rev. D 98, 036017 (2018)

work page 2018

[37] [37]

Ji, Relativistic quantum invariance of QED and QCD, The European Physical Journal Special Topics 10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01803-9 (2025)

C.-R. Ji, Relativistic quantum invariance of QED and QCD, The European Physical Journal Special Topics 10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01803-9 (2025)

work page doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01803-9 2025