pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.14359 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · gr-qc· hep-ph· nucl-th

Effects of the symmetry energy slope on magnetized neutron stars

Luiz L. Lopes , Cesar V. Flores , D\'ebora P. Menezes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 22:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE gr-qchep-phnucl-th
keywords neutron starssymmetry energymagnetic fieldstidal deformabilityequation of stategravitational wavesuniversal relations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic fields soften the equation of state for low-mass neutron stars and reduce their tidal deformability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how the slope of the symmetry energy in the nuclear equation of state changes the properties of neutron stars that carry magnetic fields. It applies the chaotic magnetic field approximation to calculate masses, radii, redshifts, tidal deformabilities, and fundamental gravitational-wave frequencies across different symmetry energy slopes. The central result is that magnetic fields affect low-mass stars most strongly by softening the equation of state, which shrinks radii and produces a clear drop in the dimensionless tidal parameter even when radius changes are modest. A sympathetic reader would care because these shifts directly affect predictions for gravitational-wave signals from neutron-star mergers and provide a way to test models of dense matter under magnetization.

Core claim

We show that the effect of the magnetic field is strong on low mass stars, producing a softer equation of state and correspondingly lower values of radii. Furthermore, the magnetic field also causes a significant drop in the dimensionless tidal parameter even when the effects on the radii are small. At the end of the paper, we discuss the effects of the magnetic field in neutron stars' universal relations.

What carries the argument

The chaotic magnetic field approximation, which modifies the equation of state to incorporate magnetic contributions, used together with relativistic mean-field models that vary the symmetry energy slope parameter.

If this is right

  • Magnetic fields reduce the radii of low-mass neutron stars relative to non-magnetized cases.
  • The dimensionless tidal deformability drops significantly even when radius changes remain small.
  • Universal relations among neutron-star observables shift when magnetic fields are included.
  • Redshifts and fundamental-mode gravitational-wave frequencies change with both the symmetry energy slope and the degree of magnetization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Ignoring magnetic fields when interpreting observed radii or tidal parameters could bias inferences about the symmetry energy slope.
  • Gravitational-wave data from low-mass mergers could provide a direct test by revealing whether tidal deformability is lower than non-magnetized predictions.
  • The same softening trend may appear in other dense-matter models once the chaotic-field treatment is applied.

Load-bearing premise

The chaotic magnetic field approximation accurately models the internal magnetic field structure and its effect on the equation of state in neutron stars, and the chosen relativistic mean-field models for the symmetry energy slope capture the relevant dense-matter physics without missing interactions.

What would settle it

A precise radius or tidal-deformability measurement of a confirmed low-mass neutron star that shows no softening or tidal-parameter drop when compared against non-magnetized models with the same symmetry energy slope.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.14359 by Cesar V. Flores, D\'ebora P. Menezes, Luiz L. Lopes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The frequency of the fundamental mode is plotted in th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we study the effect of the symmetry slope on the observables of weakly and strongly magnetized neutron stars within the chaotic magnetic field approximation. We investigate the impact of the symmetry energy slope in the equation of state, as well as on the observables of neutron stars, by calculating their masses, radii, redshifts, tidal deformabilities, and fundamental-mode gravitational-wave frequencies. We show that the effect of the magnetic field is strong on low mass stars, producing a softer equation of state and correspondingly lower values of radii. Furthermore, the magnetic field also causes a significant drop in the dimensionless tidal parameter even when the effects on the radii are small. At the end of the paper, we discuss the effects of the magnetic field in neutron stars' universal relations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the effects of the symmetry energy slope parameter L on the structure and observables of weakly and strongly magnetized neutron stars using relativistic mean-field (RMF) equations of state combined with the chaotic magnetic field approximation. It computes masses, radii, gravitational redshifts, dimensionless tidal deformabilities, and fundamental-mode gravitational-wave frequencies, reporting that magnetic fields produce a softer effective EOS and lower radii particularly for low-mass stars, along with a significant drop in tidal deformability even when radius changes are modest, and discusses impacts on universal relations.

Significance. If the central approximation holds, the work provides useful quantitative insights into the coupled effects of symmetry energy and magnetic fields on neutron-star observables, which are relevant for multi-messenger constraints from NICER, LIGO/Virgo, and future GW detectors. The emphasis on low-mass stars and tidal parameters is timely, and the exploration of universal relations offers a modest extension of existing literature. However, the absence of explicit derivations and validation checks for the magnetic-field treatment substantially reduces the immediate reliability and impact of the claimed softening effect.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods / EOS modification] Methods section on EOS and magnetic-field treatment: The chaotic magnetic field approximation is invoked to produce an effective isotropic correction to the pressure-energy relation, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit derivation or equation showing how the magnetic energy density and anisotropic stresses are averaged and inserted into the RMF Lagrangian or the hydrostatic equilibrium equation. This step is load-bearing for the headline claim of stronger softening at low masses (abstract and §4).
  2. [Numerical methods] Numerical implementation of the TOV equation: No details are provided on how the magnetic-field correction is incorporated into the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff integration (modified metric functions, pressure gradient, or central boundary conditions), nor are convergence tests, grid resolution, or error estimates reported for the computed radii, redshifts, and tidal deformabilities despite the abstract stating that numerical calculations were performed.
  3. [Results / low-mass stars] Results for low-mass stars (§4 and figures): The reported stronger magnetic-field effects on low-mass stars (softer EOS, reduced radii, and large drop in dimensionless tidal deformability) occur at lower central densities where the symmetry-energy slope L already dominates; without any cross-check against poloidal or toroidal field configurations, it remains unclear whether the softening is physical or an artifact of the averaging procedure.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels: Units for magnetic field strength B and the precise definition of the dimensionless tidal deformability are not stated consistently across panels, making quantitative comparison with other works difficult.
  2. [Introduction] Introduction: The explicit definition of the symmetry energy slope L (e.g., L = 3ρ0 dS/dρ at saturation density) should be written out rather than assumed, as it is central to the parameter study.
  3. [References] References: Several recent works on magnetized neutron stars with RMF models and alternative magnetic-field prescriptions (e.g., 2022–2024 papers) are not cited, which would help situate the chaotic approximation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us identify areas where the manuscript can be strengthened. We address each major comment point by point below and agree that expanding the methods description will improve clarity and reliability.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods / EOS modification] Methods section on EOS and magnetic-field treatment: The chaotic magnetic field approximation is invoked to produce an effective isotropic correction to the pressure-energy relation, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit derivation or equation showing how the magnetic energy density and anisotropic stresses are averaged and inserted into the RMF Lagrangian or the hydrostatic equilibrium equation. This step is load-bearing for the headline claim of stronger softening at low masses (abstract and §4).

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript does not contain an explicit step-by-step derivation of the chaotic magnetic field approximation. This standard averaging procedure combines the magnetic energy density B²/2 with the anisotropic Maxwell stress tensor to produce an effective isotropic pressure correction (typically ΔP = B²/6 added to the matter pressure). In the revised version we will insert a new subsection that derives this effective EOS modification from first principles, shows its insertion into the RMF energy density and pressure, and demonstrates how the corrected quantities enter the hydrostatic equilibrium equation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical methods] Numerical implementation of the TOV equation: No details are provided on how the magnetic-field correction is incorporated into the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff integration (modified metric functions, pressure gradient, or central boundary conditions), nor are convergence tests, grid resolution, or error estimates reported for the computed radii, redshifts, and tidal deformabilities despite the abstract stating that numerical calculations were performed.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical implementation details are missing. Under the chaotic-field approximation the metric remains Schwarzschild-like and only the pressure term in the TOV equation is replaced by the effective pressure; the central boundary conditions are unchanged. In the revision we will add a dedicated paragraph describing the modified TOV system, the numerical integrator used, the radial grid spacing, and the results of convergence tests together with estimated truncation errors on radii, redshifts and tidal deformabilities. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results / low-mass stars] Results for low-mass stars (§4 and figures): The reported stronger magnetic-field effects on low-mass stars (softer EOS, reduced radii, and large drop in dimensionless tidal deformability) occur at lower central densities where the symmetry-energy slope L already dominates; without any cross-check against poloidal or toroidal field configurations, it remains unclear whether the softening is physical or an artifact of the averaging procedure.

    Authors: The stronger softening at low masses follows directly from the fact that magnetic pressure becomes comparable to matter pressure at the lower central densities characteristic of these stars, while the symmetry-energy slope L already controls the EOS stiffness in that regime. We recognize that the isotropic averaging inherent to the chaotic-field model may not reproduce all features of realistic anisotropic configurations. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit limitations paragraph stating that the reported softening is specific to this averaging procedure and that quantitative comparison with poloidal or toroidal fields would require full GRMHD simulations, which lie outside the present scope. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation follows from standard RMF EOS variation plus numerical chaotic-field approximation

full rationale

The paper varies the symmetry-energy slope L inside established relativistic mean-field models, solves the TOV equation with the chaotic magnetic field approximation inserted numerically, and reports the resulting mass-radius and tidal-deformability curves. No equation reduces a reported observable to a fitted parameter by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and the chaotic-field averaging is treated as an external modeling choice rather than derived from the present inputs. The central claims therefore remain independent of the patterns that would produce circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard nuclear EOS models with a variable symmetry energy slope parameter and the domain assumption that the chaotic magnetic field approximation correctly averages magnetic pressure contributions without requiring detailed field geometry.

free parameters (2)
  • symmetry energy slope L
    Varied across a range of values to study its impact on the equation of state and neutron star observables.
  • magnetic field strength B
    Chosen for weakly and strongly magnetized regimes to compute effects on pressure and structure.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Chaotic magnetic field approximation holds for the internal magnetic field in neutron stars
    Invoked to model the averaged effect of the magnetic field on the equation of state without solving full MHD equations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5439 in / 1400 out tokens · 52578 ms · 2026-05-15T22:17:14.348765+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    It is possible to describe the effect of the magnetic field by using the pressure concept only when we are d ealing with a small-scale chaotic field (pag. 158)

    + ∑ l ¯ψl[(γµ (i∂µ − elAµ ) − ml)ψl, (1) where ψN and ψl are the Dirac fields of the nucleons and leptons, respectivel y; the g′s are the Yukawa coupling constants that simulate the strong interaction; the γµ = (γ 0,γ j) are the Dirac matrices; τ3 is the third Pauli matrix; M ∗ N =MN − gNσσ0 is the nucleon effective mass, with MN = 939 MeV;ml = (me,m µ ) ar...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    The soft gamma repeaters as very strongly magnetized neutron stars - i. radiative mechanism for outbursts,

    C. Thompson and R. C. Duncan, “The soft gamma repeaters as very strongly magnetized neutron stars - i. radiative mechanism for outbursts,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , vol. 275, pp. 255–300, 1995

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Magnetars: Prop erties, Origin and Evolution,

    S. Mereghetti, J. Pons, and A. Melatos, “Magnetars: Prop erties, Origin and Evolution,” Space Sci. Rev. , vol. 191, no. 1-4, pp. 315–338, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    The McGill Magnetar Catalo g,

    S. A. Olausen and V. M. Kaspi, “The McGill Magnetar Catalo g,” Astrophys. J. Suppl. , vol. 212, p. 6, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Quantum hadrodynamics,

    B. D. Serot, “Quantum hadrodynamics,” Rep. Progr. Phys. , vol. 55, pp. 1855–1946, nov 1992

    work page 1946

  6. [6]

    Hyperonic neutron stars: reconciliation b etween nuclear properties and nicer and ligo/virgo results ,

    L. L. Lopes, “Hyperonic neutron stars: reconciliation b etween nuclear properties and nicer and ligo/virgo results ,” Commun. Theor. Phys. , vol. 74, p. 015302, dec 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Relativistic mean-field hadronic models under nuclear ma tter constraints,

    M. Dutra, O. Lourenço, S. S. A vancini, et al. , “Relativistic mean-field hadronic models under nuclear ma tter constraints,” Phys. Rev. C , vol. 90, p. 055203, Nov 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Equations o f state for supernovae and compact stars,

    M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Klähn, and S. Typel, “Equations o f state for supernovae and compact stars,” Rev. Mod. Phys. , vol. 89, p. 015007, Mar 2017

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Universal correlations in the nucl ear symmetry energy, slope parameter, and curvature,

    J. W. Holt and Y. Lim, “Universal correlations in the nucl ear symmetry energy, slope parameter, and curvature,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 784, pp. 77–81, 2018

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Density slope of the nuclear symmetry energy from the neutron skin thickness of heavy nuclei,

    L.-W. Chen, C. M. Ko, B.-A. Li, and J. Xu, “Density slope of the nuclear symmetry energy from the neutron skin thickness of heavy nuclei,” Phys. Rev. C , vol. 82, p. 024321, Aug 2010

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy,

    T. Riley et al. , “A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy,” Astrophys. J. Lett. , vol. 918, p. L27, sep 2021

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Dat a,

    M. Miller et al. , “The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Dat a,” Astrophys. J. Lett. , vol. 918, p. L28, sep 2021

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Gw170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equatio n of state,

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, et al. , “Gw170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equatio n of state,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 121, p. 161101, 2018

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Relativistic effective interaction for nuclei, giant res onances, and neutron stars,

    F. Fattoyev et al. , “Relativistic effective interaction for nuclei, giant res onances, and neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. C , vol. 82, p. 055803, 2010

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    The influence of hyperons and st rong magnetic field in neutron star properties,

    L. Lopes and D. Menezes, “The influence of hyperons and st rong magnetic field in neutron star properties,” Braz. J. Phys. , vol. 42, p. 428, 2012

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    An undergraduate approach to the quantum h adrodynamics and physics of neutron stars,

    L. L. Lopes, “An undergraduate approach to the quantum h adrodynamics and physics of neutron stars,” Universe, vol. 11, no. 8, 2025

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Relativistic calculation of n uclear matter and the nuclear surface,

    J. Boguta and A. Bodmer, “Relativistic calculation of n uclear matter and the nuclear surface,” Nucl. Phys. A , vol. 292, p. 413, 1977

    work page 1977

  18. [18]

    The physics of strong magnetic fi elds in neutron stars,

    Q.-h. Peng and H. Tong, “The physics of strong magnetic fi elds in neutron stars,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , vol. 378, pp. 159–162, 2007

    work page 2007

  19. [19]

    The equat ion of state of neutron star matter in strong magnetic fields,

    A. Broderick, M. Prakash, and J. M. Lattimer, “The equat ion of state of neutron star matter in strong magnetic fields, ” Astrophys. J. , vol. 537, p. 351, 2000

    work page 2000

  20. [20]

    Quar k–hadron phase transition in a neutron star under strong magnetic fields,

    A. Rabhi, H. Pais, P. K. Panda, and C. Providência, “Quar k–hadron phase transition in a neutron star under strong magnetic fields,” J. Phys. G , vol. 36, p. 115204, 2009

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. Nivikov, Compact stars:. Dover, New York, 1996

    work page 1996

  22. [22]

    On magnetized neutron stars,

    L. Lopes and D. Menezes, “On magnetized neutron stars,” J. Cosm. Astrop. Phys. , vol. 2015, no. 08, p. 002, 2015

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Gravita tional wave signatures of highly magnetized neutron stars,

    C. Flores, L. Lopes, L. Benito, and D. Menezes, “Gravita tional wave signatures of highly magnetized neutron stars, ” Eur. Phys. J. C , vol. 80, p. 1142, 2020

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Role of vector channel in d ifferent classes of (non) magnetized neutron stars,

    L. L. Lopes and D. P. Menezes, “Role of vector channel in d ifferent classes of (non) magnetized neutron stars,” Eur. Phys. J. A , vol. 56, p. 122, 2020

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Neutron stars including the effects of chaotic magnetic fields and anomalous magnetic moments*,

    F. Wu, C. Wu, and Z.-Z. Ren, “Neutron stars including the effects of chaotic magnetic fields and anomalous magnetic moments*,” Chin. Phys. C , vol. 41, p. 045102, 2017

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Phase transitions and laten t heat in magnetized matter,

    M. Pelicer and D. Menezes, “Phase transitions and laten t heat in magnetized matter,” Eur. Phys. J. A , vol. 58, p. 177, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Rotating neutron stars with chaotic magnetic fields in gen eral relativity and rastall gravity,

    M. Lawrence Pattersons et al. , “Rotating neutron stars with chaotic magnetic fields in gen eral relativity and rastall gravity,” Inter. J. Mod. Phys. D , vol. 34, p. 2550074, 2025

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    The soft gamma repeaters a s very strongly magnetized neutron stars. ii. quiescent neutrino, x-ray, and alfvén wave emission,

    C. Thompson and R. C. Duncan, “The soft gamma repeaters a s very strongly magnetized neutron stars. ii. quiescent neutrino, x-ray, and alfvén wave emission,” Astrophys. J. , vol. 473, p. 322, 1996

    work page 1996

  29. [29]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsk, Black Holes, White Dwarf and Neutron Stars . Wiley, New York, 1983. 14

    work page 1983

  30. [30]

    M any-body forces in magnetic neutron stars,

    R. O. Gomes, B. Franzon, V. Dexheimer, and S. Schramm, “M any-body forces in magnetic neutron stars,” Astrophys. J. , vol. 850, p. 20, nov 2017

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Magnetic field d istribution in magnetars,

    D. Chatterjee, J. Novak, and M. Oertel, “Magnetic field d istribution in magnetars,” Phys. Rev. C , vol. 99, p. 055811, 2019

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Imprints of the nuclear symmetry energy slope in gravitat ional wave signals emanating from neutron stars,

    L. L. Lopes et al. , “Imprints of the nuclear symmetry energy slope in gravitat ional wave signals emanating from neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 108, p. 083042, Oct 2023

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    On massive neutron c ores,

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, “On massive neutron c ores,” Phys. Rev. , vol. 55, pp. 374–381, Feb 1939

    work page 1939

  34. [34]

    The ground stat e of matter at high densities,

    G. Baym, C. Pethick, and P. Sutherland, “The ground stat e of matter at high densities,” Astrophys. J. , vol. 170, p. 299, 1971

    work page 1971

  35. [35]

    Neutron star mat ter,

    G. Baym, H. A. Bethe, and C. J. Pethick, “Neutron star mat ter,” Nucl.Phys. A , vol. 175, no. 2, p. 225, 1971

    work page 1971

  36. [36]

    N. K. Glendenning, Compact stars:. 2 ed. Edition, Springer New York, 2000

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    Neutron star radii and crusts: Uncertainties and unified e quations of state,

    M. Fortin et al. , “Neutron star radii and crusts: Uncertainties and unified e quations of state,” Phys. Rev. C , vol. 94, p. 035804, Sep 2016

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Role of the symmetry energy slope in neutro n stars: Exploring the model dependency,

    L. L. Lopes, “Role of the symmetry energy slope in neutro n stars: Exploring the model dependency,” Phys. Rev. C , vol. 110, p. 015805, 2024

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Decoding rotating neutron stars: Role of t he symmetry energy slope,

    L. L. Lopes, “Decoding rotating neutron stars: Role of t he symmetry energy slope,” Astrophys. J. , vol. 966, p. 184, 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Estim ating magnetar radii with an empirical meta-model,

    D. Chatterjee, F. Gulminelli, and D. P. Menezes, “Estim ating magnetar radii with an empirical meta-model,” JCAP, vol. 2019, no. 03, p. 035, 2019

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Neutro n star crusts,

    C. P. Lorenz, D. G. Ravenhall, and C. J. Pethick, “Neutro n star crusts,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 70, pp. 379–382, Jan 1993

    work page 1993

  42. [42]

    Pasta phases in neutron star mantle: Extended thomas–fermi vs. compressible liquid drop approaches,

    N. N. Shchechilin, N. A. Zemlyakov, A. I. Chugunov, and M . E. Gusakov, “Pasta phases in neutron star mantle: Extended thomas–fermi vs. compressible liquid drop approaches,” Universe, vol. 8, no. 11, 2022

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Neutro n star properties and the symmetry energy,

    R. Cavagnoli, D. Menezes, and C. Providencias, “Neutro n star properties and the symmetry energy,” Phys. Rev. C , vol. 84, p. 065810, 2011

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    Gravi tational-wave constraints on the neutron-star-matter equ ation of state,

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, and A. Vuorinen, “Gravi tational-wave constraints on the neutron-star-matter equ ation of state,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 120, p. 172703, 2018

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    The neutron star inner crust: An empirical essay,

    L. L. Lopes, “The neutron star inner crust: An empirical essay,” Europhys. Lett., vol. 134, p. 52001, 2021

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Gravitationally redshifted absorption lines in the X-ray burst spectra of a n eutron star,

    J. Cottam, F. Paerels, and M. Mendez, “Gravitationally redshifted absorption lines in the X-ray burst spectra of a n eutron star,” Nature, vol. 420, p. 51, 2020

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    The compactness of the isolated neutron star rx j0720.4-3125,

    V. Hambaryan, V. Suleimanov, F. Haberl, A. D. Schwope, R . Neuhäuser, M. Hohle, and K. Werner, “The compactness of the isolated neutron star rx j0720.4-3125,” A&A, vol. 601, p. A108, 2017

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Tidal love numbers of neutron stars,

    T. Hinderer, “Tidal love numbers of neutron stars,” Astrophys. J. , vol. 677, p. 1216, apr 2008

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars,

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, “Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 80, p. 084035, Oct 2009

    work page 2009

  50. [50]

    Relativistic theory of t idal love numbers,

    T. Binnington and E. Poisson, “Relativistic theory of t idal love numbers,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 80, p. 084018, Oct 2009

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    Constraining neutron- star tidal love numbers with gravitational-wave detectors ,

    E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, “Constraining neutron- star tidal love numbers with gravitational-wave detectors ,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 77, p. 021502, Jan 2008

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    Constraining the high-density behavior of the nuclear symm etry energy with the tidal polarizability of neutron stars,

    F. J. Fattoyev, J. Carvajal, W. G. Newton, and B.-A. Li, “ Constraining the high-density behavior of the nuclear symm etry energy with the tidal polarizability of neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. C , vol. 87, p. 015806, Jan 2013

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Relativistic parameterizations of ne utron matter and implications for neutron stars,

    N. Hornick, L. Tolos, A. Zacchi, J.-E. Christian, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, “Relativistic parameterizations of ne utron matter and implications for neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. C , vol. 98, p. 065804, Dec 2018

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Tidal deformabi lity of neutron and hyperon stars within relativistic mean fi eld equations of state,

    B. Kumar, S. K. Biswal, and S. K. Patra, “Tidal deformabi lity of neutron and hyperon stars within relativistic mean fi eld equations of state,” Phys. Rev. C , vol. 95, p. 015801, Jan 2017

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Tid al deformability of neutron stars with realistic equations of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary ins piral,

    T. Hinderer, B. D. Lackey, R. N. Lang, and J. S. Read, “Tid al deformability of neutron stars with realistic equations of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary ins piral,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 81, p. 123016, Jun 2010

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    Mea suring the neutron star tidal deformability with equation- of- state-independent relations and gravitational waves,

    K. Chatziioannou, C.-J. Haster, and A. Zimmerman, “Mea suring the neutron star tidal deformability with equation- of- state-independent relations and gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 97, p. 104036, May 2018

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Neutron-star tidal deformability and equation-of-state constraints,

    K. Chatziioannou, “Neutron-star tidal deformability and equation-of-state constraints,” Gen. Rel. Grav , vol. 52, p. 109, 2020

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Non-Radial Pulsatio n of General-Relativistic Stellar Models. I. Analytic Anal ysis for L >= 2,

    K. S. Thorne and A. Campolattaro, “Non-Radial Pulsatio n of General-Relativistic Stellar Models. I. Analytic Anal ysis for L >= 2,” Sept. 1967

    work page 1967

  59. [59]

    Nonradial Pulsation of General-Relativistic Stellar Models. V. Analytic Analy sis for L = 1,

    A. Campolattaro and K. S. Thorne, “Nonradial Pulsation of General-Relativistic Stellar Models. V. Analytic Analy sis for L = 1,” Astrophys. J. , vol. 159, p. 847, Mar. 1970

    work page 1970

  60. [60]

    The quadrupole oscill ations of neutron stars.,

    L. Lindblom and S. L. Detweiler, “The quadrupole oscill ations of neutron stars.,” apjs, vol. 53, pp. 73–92, Sept. 1983

    work page 1983

  61. [61]

    On the nonradial pulsati ons of general relativistic stellar models,

    S. Detweiler and L. Lindblom, “On the nonradial pulsati ons of general relativistic stellar models,” Astrophys. J. , vol. 292, pp. 12–15, May 1985

    work page 1985

  62. [62]

    Stability of a Schwarzschil d Singularity,

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, “Stability of a Schwarzschil d Singularity,” Physical Review , vol. 108, pp. 1063–1069, Nov. 1957

    work page 1957

  63. [63]

    Fun damental oscillation modes of self-interacting bosonic da rk stars,

    C. V. Flores, A. Parisi, C.-S. Chen, and G. Lugones, “Fun damental oscillation modes of self-interacting bosonic da rk stars,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , vol. 2019, p. 051, jun 2019

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    Gravitationa l wave asteroseismology reexamined,

    O. Benhar, V. Ferrari, and L. Gualtieri, “Gravitationa l wave asteroseismology reexamined,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 70, p. 124015, Dec 2004

    work page 2004

  65. [65]

    An alysis of neutron star f-mode oscillations in general relat ivity with spectral representation of nuclear equations of state ,

    D. Guha Roy, T. Malik, S. Bhattacharya, and S. Banik, “An alysis of neutron star f-mode oscillations in general relat ivity with spectral representation of nuclear equations of state ,” Astrophys. J. , vol. 968, p. 124, 2024

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Effect of hyperon bulk viscos ity on neutron-star r-modes,

    L. Lindblom and B. J. Owen, “Effect of hyperon bulk viscos ity on neutron-star r-modes,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 65, p. 063006, Mar 2002

    work page 2002

  67. [67]

    Discriminating hadr onic and quark stars through gravitational waves of fluid pul sation 15 modes,

    C. Vásquez Flores and G. Lugones, “Discriminating hadr onic and quark stars through gravitational waves of fluid pul sation 15 modes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity , vol. 31, p. 155002, jul 2014

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    Universal relations for neu tron star f -mode and g-mode oscillations,

    T. Zhao and J. M. Lattimer, “Universal relations for neu tron star f -mode and g-mode oscillations,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 106, p. 123002, Dec 2022

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    The einstein telescope: a third-generation gravitation al wave observatory,

    M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, et al. , “The einstein telescope: a third-generation gravitation al wave observatory,” Classical and Quantum Gravity , vol. 27, p. 194002, sep 2010

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    Gw170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a bina ry neutron star inspiral,

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, et al. , “Gw170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a bina ry neutron star inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 119, p. 161101, Oct 2017

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    Are gravitatio nal waves from giant magnetar flares observable?,

    B. Zink, P. D. Lasky, and K. D. Kokkotas, “Are gravitatio nal waves from giant magnetar flares observable?,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 85, p. 024030, Jan 2012

    work page 2012

  72. [72]

    Towards gravitationa l wave asteroseismology,

    N. Andersson and K. D. Kokkotas, “Towards gravitationa l wave asteroseismology,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , vol. 299, pp. 1059–1068, 10 1998

    work page 1998

  73. [73]

    General relativistic treatment of f -mode oscillations of hyperonic stars,

    B. K. Pradhan, D. Chatterjee, M. Lanoye, and P. Jaikumar , “General relativistic treatment of f -mode oscillations of hyperonic stars,” Phys. Rev. C , vol. 106, p. 015805, 2022

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Fundamenta l oscillation modes of neutron stars: validity of universal relations,

    C. Chirenti, G. H. de Souza, and W. Kastaun, “Fundamenta l oscillation modes of neutron stars: validity of universal relations,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 91, no. 4, p. 044034, 2015

    work page 2015