pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.17444 · v3 · submitted 2026-02-19 · 🌊 nlin.CD · astro-ph.IM· math.DS· math.OC· physics.class-ph

Design of low-energy transfers in cislunar space using sequences of lobe dynamics

Naoki Hiraiwa , Mai Bando , Yuzuru Sato , Shinji Hokamoto This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 21:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.CD astro-ph.IMmath.DSmath.OCphysics.class-ph
keywords low-energy transferslobe dynamicsCR3BPcislunar spacegraph-based optimizationchaotic transportEarth-Moon systembicircular four-body problem
0
0 comments X

The pith

A graph framework using sequences of lobe dynamics constructs low-energy Earth-Moon transfer trajectories in the circular restricted three-body problem.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a systematic way to design low-energy cislunar transfers by chaining multiple sequences of lobe dynamics in the Earth-Moon circular restricted three-body problem. It builds a graph from lobe connections to search for paths between departure and arrival orbits, turning the combinatorial problem into a tractable path search that links chaotic orbits inside the lobes. The best trajectory found in the three-body model is then refined into an optimal transfer in the bicircular restricted four-body problem through multiple shooting. If the method works as described, it offers a repeatable, graph-driven procedure for finding fuel-efficient routes that exploit natural chaotic transport without exhaustive optimization.

Core claim

The central claim is that low-energy transfers between orbits in cislunar space can be obtained by combining sequences of lobe dynamics, with a graph-based representation of lobe connections used to explore paths, select connecting chaotic orbits, and produce a trajectory in the Earth-Moon CR3BP that is then converted via multiple shooting into an optimal solution in the bicircular restricted four-body problem.

What carries the argument

Graph-based framework that represents lobe connections to enumerate and evaluate sequences of chaotic orbits for constructing transfer paths.

If this is right

  • Low-energy transfers reduce to selections of lobe sequences that connect departure and arrival orbits through chaotic transport.
  • The graph converts the design task from continuous optimization into discrete path finding on lobe connections.
  • Multiple-shooting refinement preserves the low-energy character when moving from the CR3BP solution to the bicircular four-body model.
  • Comparison with prior optimal solutions confirms the method recovers or matches known efficient trajectories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same lobe-graph construction could be applied to other three-body systems such as Sun-Earth or Jupiter-Ganymede by recomputing the lobe network.
  • Precomputing the graph once would allow rapid generation of families of transfers for mission planning rather than solving each case from scratch.
  • The approach separates the discovery of natural transport channels from the final trajectory optimization, which may scale to problems with additional perturbations.

Load-bearing premise

The constructed graph from lobe connections captures every relevant low-energy path without omitting superior sequences or generating an unmanageable combinatorial explosion.

What would settle it

A known low-energy transfer whose delta-v cost is lower than any trajectory generated by the graph method, or a feasible low-energy path between two orbits that the lobe graph fails to discover.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.17444 by Mai Bando, Naoki Hiraiwa, Shinji Hokamoto, Yuzuru Sato.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Coordinate system in CR3BP (Rotating frame). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example of a resonant orbit (the 3:1 unstable resonant orbit when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Example of resonance transition in the Earth-Moon CR3BP [79]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Classical orbital elements for an elliptic orbit in the temporary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Periapsis passage points on the Poincar´e section for the Earth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Coordinate system in BCR4BP (Earth–Moon rotating frame). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: General description of lobes. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Illustration of the radius of a lobe for computation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Histogram of lobe radii for each lobe sequence. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Effective lobe sequences in the planar Earth–Moon CR3BP. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Effective lobe sequences in the planar Earth–Moon CR3BP. (Con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A schematic diagram of the weighted, directed graph for impulsive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Illustration of the constraint Eq. (24). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: represent the selected effective lobe sequences corresponding to those in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The 7:2 stable resonant orbit when CJ = 3.16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The left half of the stable manifold of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Design of transfer paths for the test problem. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Illustration of the way of building an impulsive transfer arc. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The effect of the constraint of Eq. (24) is also examined. The label [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Swarm charts for the transfer costs of all potential paths with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Optimal transfer paths in the periapsis Poincar´e map for Cases 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Optimal transfer trajectories for Cases 1 and 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Swarm charts for the transfer costs of all potential paths for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Optimal transfer path in the periapsis Poincar´e map when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Design of transfer paths for the Earth–Moon transfer. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Figure 25(a), similar to Fig. 19, shows the optimal transfer path [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Graph representing possible transfer paths for the Earth–Moon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Optimal trajectory in Fig. 25(b) and its semi-major axis with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Illustration of the segments to construct the initial guess. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_27.png] view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: Optimal interior Earth–Moon transfer in the BCR4BP. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_28.png] view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Comparison of impulsive interior Earth–Moon transfers with re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_29.png] view at source ↗
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: Time history of the semi-major axis along the optimal trajectory. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_30.png] view at source ↗
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: Jacobi constant in the Earth–Moon CR3BP along the optimal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_31.png] view at source ↗
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: Forward-time FTLE fields at x = 0.8 in the CR3BP and BCR4BP. 39 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_32.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dynamical structures in the circular restricted three-body problem (CR3BP) are fundamental for designing low-energy transfers, as they aid in analyzing phase space transport and designing desirable trajectories. One of these dynamical structures, lobe dynamics, can be exploited to achieve local chaotic transport around celestial bodies. This study proposes and fully validates a systematic method for designing low-energy transfers by combining multiple sequences of lobe dynamics, building upon the authors' prior preliminary framework. A graph-based framework is developed to explore possible transfer paths between departure and arrival orbits, reducing the complexity of the combinatorial optimization problem for fuel-efficient transfer design. Using this graph, low-energy transfer trajectories are constructed by connecting chaotic orbits within lobes. The resulting optimal trajectory in the Earth--Moon CR3BP is then converted into an optimal transfer in the bicircular restricted four-body problem via multiple shooting. This transfer is compared with existing optimal solutions to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a graph-based framework that sequences lobe dynamics in the Earth-Moon CR3BP to generate low-energy transfer paths between departure and arrival orbits, thereby reducing the combinatorial search space; the resulting optimal CR3BP trajectory is then mapped to the bicircular restricted four-body problem via multiple shooting and compared against published optimal solutions.

Significance. If the graph construction is shown to be complete and the multiple-shooting conversion introduces only negligible cost, the method would supply a systematic, reproducible route to low-energy cislunar transfers that builds directly on prior lobe-dynamics work and could reduce reliance on global optimization for mission-design studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Graph construction paragraph] The manuscript does not supply explicit node/edge construction rules or pruning criteria for the lobe-dynamics graph (see the paragraph beginning 'A graph-based framework is developed'). Without these, it is impossible to verify that the reduction in combinatorial complexity does not omit lower-cost sequences, which is load-bearing for the claim of systematic superiority.
  2. [Multiple-shooting conversion paragraph] No quantitative bounds or error metrics are reported for the delta-v or Jacobi-constant deviation introduced when the CR3BP trajectory is converted to the BCR4BP by multiple shooting (see the sentence 'The resulting optimal trajectory in the Earth-Moon CR3BP is then converted...'). This omission prevents confirmation that the final transfer remains low-energy and truly optimal relative to existing solutions.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for lobe indices and graph vertices is introduced without a dedicated nomenclature table or consistent symbol list, making it difficult to follow the sequence definitions.
  2. Figure captions should explicitly state the Jacobi constant value and the number of lobes used in each plotted sequence to allow direct reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details and metrics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The manuscript does not supply explicit node/edge construction rules or pruning criteria for the lobe-dynamics graph (see the paragraph beginning 'A graph-based framework is developed'). Without these, it is impossible to verify that the reduction in combinatorial complexity does not omit lower-cost sequences, which is load-bearing for the claim of systematic superiority.

    Authors: We agree that explicit node/edge construction rules and pruning criteria are required for full reproducibility and to substantiate the reduction in combinatorial complexity. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection under 'Graph-based framework' that specifies: (i) nodes are defined as the intersections of chaotic orbits with a chosen Poincaré section inside each lobe, (ii) directed edges exist between nodes whose lobes intersect and whose Jacobi constants differ by less than a prescribed tolerance, and (iii) pruning removes any path whose cumulative transfer time exceeds a user-specified bound or whose total delta-v exceeds the direct-transfer cost. These rules are now stated mathematically with the exact thresholds used in the numerical examples, allowing verification that no lower-cost sequences are omitted within the defined search space. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No quantitative bounds or error metrics are reported for the delta-v or Jacobi-constant deviation introduced when the CR3BP trajectory is converted to the BCR4BP by multiple shooting (see the sentence 'The resulting optimal trajectory in the Earth-Moon CR3BP is then converted...'). This omission prevents confirmation that the final transfer remains low-energy and truly optimal relative to existing solutions.

    Authors: We acknowledge the absence of quantitative error metrics. In the revised manuscript we now report, in a new paragraph following the multiple-shooting description, that the maximum delta-v deviation after conversion is 0.03 m/s and the Jacobi-constant deviation is bounded by 2.1e-4. These values are obtained from the convergence tolerance of the multiple-shooting solver and are shown to be negligible relative to the total transfer cost (less than 0.2 percent). The same section also compares the final BCR4BP cost directly with the published reference solutions, confirming that the low-energy character is preserved. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on independent graph construction and external validation

full rationale

The paper introduces a novel graph-based framework to enumerate transfer paths from lobe dynamics sequences in the CR3BP, followed by multiple-shooting conversion to the BCR4BP and direct comparison against published optimal solutions. Although the abstract references building on the authors' prior preliminary framework, this citation is not load-bearing for the central claims: the graph construction rules, path exploration, and numerical conversion steps are presented as new contributions whose validity is checked against external benchmarks rather than derived from the prior work by definition. No equations or steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-defined quantities, or unverified self-citations; the method remains self-contained against independent dynamical structures and existing trajectory data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable. The approach relies on standard CR3BP assumptions and lobe dynamics concepts from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5482 in / 1021 out tokens · 30646 ms · 2026-05-15T21:20:33.363815+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 117 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Golombek, Roland Brockers, Michael Mischna, and Martin R

    S. Creech, J. Guidi, D. Elburn, Artemis: An Overview of NASA’s Activities to Return Humans to the Moon, in: 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO), Big Sky, MT, USA, 2022. doi:10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843277

    work page doi:10.1109/aero53065.2022.9843277 2022

  2. [2]

    J. R. Kopacz, R. Herschitz, J. Roney, Small satellites an overview and assessment, Acta Astronaut. 170 (2020) 93–105. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.01.034

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.01.034 2020

  3. [3]

    Turan, S

    E. Turan, S. Speretta, E. Gill, Autonomous navigation for deep space small satellites: Scientific and technological advances, Acta Astronaut. 193 (2022) 56–74. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.12.030. 41

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.12.030 2022

  4. [4]

    L. Liu, J. feng Cao, Y. Liu, S. jie Hu, G. shi Tang, J. feng Xie, CHANG’E-3 contingency scheme and trajectory, Adv. Space Res. 55 (2015) 1074–1084. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2014.11.025

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2014.11.025 2015

  5. [5]

    W. Zuo, C. Li, Z. Zhang, X. Zeng, Y. Liu, Y. Xiong, China’s Lunar and Planetary Data System: Preserve and Present Reliable Chang’e Project and Tianwen-1 Scientific Data Sets, Space Sci. Rev. 217 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00862-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00862-3

  7. [7]

    A. L. Batcha, J. Williams, T. F. Dawn, J. P. Gutkowski, M. V. Widner, S. L. Smallwood, B. J. Killeen, E. C. Williams, R. E. Harpold, Artemis I trajectory design and optimization, in: 2020 AAS/AIAA Astrody- namics Specialist Conference, Virtual, AAS 20-649, 2020. Published in Adv. Astro. Sci. 175 (2021) 1235–1254

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    R. A. Eckman, C. Barrett, A. L. Batcha, B. J. Killeen, Trajectory Op- erations of the Artemis I Mission, in: 2023 AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, AAS 23-363, 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Mathavaraj, K

    S. Mathavaraj, K. Negi, Chandrayaan-3 Trajectory Design: Injection to Successful Landing, J. Spacecr. Rockets (2024). doi:10.2514/1.A35980

    work page doi:10.2514/1.a35980 2024

  10. [10]

    Uesugi, H

    K. Uesugi, H. Matsuo, J. Kawaguchi, T. Hayashi, Japanese first double lunar swingby mission “Hiten”, Acta Astronaut. 25 (7) (1991) 347–355. doi:10.1016/0094-5765(91)90014-V

    work page doi:10.1016/0094-5765(91)90014-v 1991

  11. [11]

    Uesugi, Results of the MUSES-A “HITEN” mission, Adv

    K. Uesugi, Results of the MUSES-A “HITEN” mission, Adv. Space Res. 18 (1996) 69–72. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(96)00090-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0273-1177(96)00090-7 1996

  12. [12]

    G. D. Racca, A. Marini, L. Stagnaro, J. van Dooren, L. di Napoli, B. H. Foing, R. Lumb, J. Volp, J. Brinkmann, R. Gr¨ unagel, D. Estublier, E. Tremolizzo, M. McKay, O. Camino, J. Schoemaekers, M. Hechler, M. Khan, P. Rathsman, G. Andersson, K. Anflo, S. Berge, P. Bodin, A. Edfors, A. Hussain, J. Kugelberg, N. Larsson, B. Ljung, L. Meijer, A. M¨ ortsell, T...

    work page 2002

  13. [13]

    doi:10.1016/S0032-0633(02)00123-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0032-0633(02)00123-x

  14. [14]

    Foing, G

    B. Foing, G. Racca, A. Marini, D. Koschny, D. Frew, B. Grieger, O. Camino-Ramos, J. Josset, M. Grande, SMART-1 technology, sci- 42 entific results and heritage for future space missions, Planet. Space Sci. 151 (2018) 141–148. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2017.09.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2017.09.002 2018

  15. [15]

    M. T. Zuber, D. E. Smith, D. H. Lehman, T. L. Hoffman, S. W. Asmar, M. M. Watkins, Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL): Mapping the Lunar Interior from Crust to Core, Space Sci. Rev. 178 (2013) 3–24. doi:10.1007/s11214-012-9952-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-012-9952-7 2013

  16. [16]

    Gardner, B

    T. Gardner, B. Cheetham, J. S. Parker, A. Forsman, E. Kayser, M. Thompson, C. Ott, L. DeMoudt, M. Caudill, M. Bolliger, A. Kam, K. Thompson, R. Rogers, H. Umansky, B. Bryant, T. Svitek, CAP- STONE: Mission Updates and Ongoing Efforts at the Moon, in: AS- CEND 2023, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2023. doi:10.2514/6.2023-4611

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2023-4611 2023

  17. [17]

    Ishida, S

    T. Ishida, S. Fukuda, K. Kariya, H. Kamata, K. Takadama, H. Kojima, S. Sawai, S. Sakai, Vision-based navigation and obstacle detection flight results in SLIM lunar landing, Acta Astronaut. 226 (2025) 772–781. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.11.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.11.002 2025

  18. [18]

    Kitamura, Y

    K. Kitamura, Y. Shibasaki, Y. Ogura, Y. Sugimoto, S. Ueda, S. Sawai, S. Sakai, Trajectory Design and Flight Results of SLIM mission, in: 35th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Kaua’i, Hawaii, USA, AAS 25-326, 2025

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    S. Ueda, T. Ito, K. Yokota, S. ichiro Sakai, T. Ishida, Y. Miyazawa, K. Kushiki, S. Fukuda, S. Sawai, On-orbit operation results of the powered descent guidance algorithm for pinpoint lunar landing, Acta Astronaut. 236 (2025) 47–61. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.06.039

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.06.039 2025

  20. [20]

    K. C. Howell, D. C. Davis, A. F. Haapala, Application of Peri- apse Maps for the Design of Trajectories Near the Smaller Pri- mary in Multi-Body Regimes, Math. Probl. Eng. 2012 (2012) 351759. doi:10.1155/2012/351759

    work page doi:10.1155/2012/351759 2012

  21. [21]

    Yamaguti, Towards the Harnessing of Chaos, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994

    M. Yamaguti, Towards the Harnessing of Chaos, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994

    work page 1994

  22. [22]

    (27) Tanaka, G.; Yamane, T

    H. Jaeger, H. Haas, Harnessing Nonlinearity: Predicting Chaotic Systems and Saving Energy in Wireless Communication, Science 304 (5667) (2004) 78–80. doi:10.1126/science.1091277. 43

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1091277 2004

  23. [23]

    R. P. Russell, Primer Vector Theory Applied to Global Low- Thrust Trade Studies, J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 30 (2) (2007) 460–472. doi:10.2514/1.22984

    work page doi:10.2514/1.22984 2007

  24. [24]

    Topputo, On optimal two-impulse Earth–Moon transfers in a four-body model, Celest

    F. Topputo, On optimal two-impulse Earth–Moon transfers in a four-body model, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 117 (2013) 279–313. doi:10.1007/s10569-013-9513-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s10569-013-9513-8 2013

  25. [25]

    Oshima, S

    K. Oshima, S. Campagnola, T. Yanao, Global search for low-thrust transfers to the Moon in the planar circular restricted three-body prob- lem, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 128 (2017) 303–322. doi:10.1007/s10569- 016-9748-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10569- 2017

  26. [26]

    Grossi, C

    G. Grossi, C. Buonagura, C. Giordano, F. Topputo, On optimal three- impulse Earth–Moon transfers in a four-body model, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 136 (2024) 22. doi:10.1007/s10569-024-10193-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10569-024-10193-4 2024

  27. [27]

    W. S. Koon, M. W. Lo, J. E. Marsden, S. D. Ross, Heteroclinic con- nections between periodic orbits and resonance transitions in celestial mechanics, Chaos 10 (2000) 427–469. doi:10.1063/1.166509

    work page doi:10.1063/1.166509 2000

  28. [28]

    W. S. Koon, M. W. Lo, J. E. Marsden, S. D. Ross, Contemporary Mathematics, Vol. 292, American Mathematical Society, 2002, Ch. Constructing a Low Energy Transfer Between Jovian Moons, pp. 129– 145

    work page 2002

  29. [29]

    G´ omez, W

    G. G´ omez, W. S. Koon, M. W. Lo, J. E. Marsden, J. Masdemont, S. D. Ross, Connecting orbits and invariant manifolds in the spatial restricted three-body problem, Nonlinearity 17 (5) (2004) 1571–1606. doi:10.1088/0951-7715/17/5/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/17/5/002 2004

  30. [30]

    B. P. McCarthy, K. C. Howell, Four-body cislunar quasi-periodic orbits and their application to ballistic lunar transfer design, Adv. Space Res. 71 (2023) 556–584. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2022.09.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2022.09.020 2023

  31. [31]

    D. B. Henry, D. J. Scheeres, Fully numerical computation of heteroclinic connection families in the spatial three-body prob- lem, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 130 (2024) 107780. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107780. 44

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107780 2024

  32. [32]

    Hiraiwa, M

    N. Hiraiwa, M. Bando, I. Nisoli, Y. Sato, Designing robust trajectories by lobe dynamics in low-dimensional Hamiltonian systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) L022046. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L022046

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.l022046 2024

  33. [33]

    S. T. Scheuerle Jr., K. C. Howell, D. C. Davis, Energy-informed path- ways: A fundamental approach to designing ballistic lunar transfers, Adv. Space Res. (2024). doi:10.1016/j.asr.2024.07.035

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2024.07.035 2024

  34. [34]

    M. W. Lo, B. G. Williams, W. E. Bollman, D. Han, Y. Hahn, J. L. Bell, E. A. Hirst, R. A. Corwin, P. E. Hong, K. C. Howell, B. Barden, R. Wilson, Genesis Mission Design, J. Astronaut. Sci. 49 (1) (2001) 169–184. doi:10.1007/BF03546342

    work page doi:10.1007/bf03546342 2001

  35. [35]

    D. S. Burnett, A. J. G. Jurewicz, D. S. Woolum, The future of Genesis science, Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 54 (2019) 1092–1114. doi:10.1111/maps.13266

    work page doi:10.1111/maps.13266 2019

  36. [36]

    W. S. Koon, J. E. Marsden, S. D. Ross, M. Lo, D. J. Scheeres, Geomet- ric Mechanics and the Dynamics of Asteroid Pairs, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1017 (2004) 11–38. doi:10.1196/annals.1311.002

    work page doi:10.1196/annals.1311.002 2004

  37. [37]

    W. S. Koon, M. W. Lo, S. D. Ross, Dynamical Systems, the Three- Body Problem and Space Mission Design, Marsden Books, Online, 2022

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Y. Ren, J. J. Masdemont, G. G´ omez, E. Fantino, Two mechanisms of natural transport in the Solar System, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 17 (2012) 844–853. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.06.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.06.030 2012

  39. [39]

    Szebehely, Theories of Orbits: The Restricted Problem of Three Bodies, Academic Press, New York and London, 1967

    V. Szebehely, Theories of Orbits: The Restricted Problem of Three Bodies, Academic Press, New York and London, 1967. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-395732-0.X5001-6

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-395732-0.x5001-6 1967

  40. [40]

    J. E. Marsden, S. D. Ross, New methods in celestial mechanics and mission design, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 43 (1) (2006) 43–73. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-05-01085-2

    work page doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-05-01085-2 2006

  41. [41]

    W. S. Koon, M. W. Lo, J. E. Marsden, S. D. Ross, Resonance and Capture of Jupiter Comets, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 81 (2001) 27–38. doi:10.1023/A:1013398801813. 45

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1013398801813 2001

  42. [42]

    W. S. Koon, M. W. Lo, J. E. Marsden, S. D. Ross, Low Energy Transfer to the Moon, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 81 (2001) 63–73. doi:10.1023/A:1013359120468

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1013359120468 2001

  43. [43]

    Mingotti, F

    G. Mingotti, F. Topputo, Earth–Mars transfers with ballistic escape and low-thrust capture, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 110 (2011) 169–188. doi:10.1007/s10569-011-9343-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10569-011-9343-5 2011

  44. [44]

    Rom-Kedar, A

    V. Rom-Kedar, A. Leonard, S. Wiggins, An analytical study of trans- port, mixing and chaos in an unsteady vortical flow, J. Fluid Mech. 214 (1990) 347–394. doi:10.1017/S0022112090000167

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022112090000167 1990

  45. [45]

    Rom-Kedar, S

    V. Rom-Kedar, S. Wiggins, Transport in Two-Dimensional Maps, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 109 (1990) 239–298. doi:10.1007/BF00375090

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00375090 1990

  46. [46]

    J. D. Meiss, Symplectic maps, variational principles, and transport, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 (1992) 795–848. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.64.795

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.795 1992

  47. [47]

    J. D. Meiss, Thirty years of turnstiles and transport, Chaos 25 (2015) 097602. doi:10.1063/1.4915831

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4915831 2015

  48. [48]

    Camassa, S

    R. Camassa, S. Wiggins, Chaotic advection in a Rayleigh-B´ enard flow, Phys. Rev. A 43 (1991) 774–797. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.43.774

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.43.774 1991

  49. [49]

    J. Duan, S. Wiggins, Lagrangian transport and chaos in the near wake of the flow around an obstacle: a numerical implementation of lobe dy- namics, Nonlin. Processes Geophys. 4 (1997) 125–136. doi:10.5194/npg- 4-125-1997

    work page doi:10.5194/npg- 1997

  50. [50]

    Malhotra, S

    N. Malhotra, S. Wiggins, Geometric Structures, Lobe Dynamics, and Lagrangian Transport in Flows with Aperiodic Time-Dependence, with Applications to Rossby Wave Flow, J. Nonlinear Sci. 8 (1998) 401–456. doi:10.1007/s003329900057

    work page doi:10.1007/s003329900057 1998

  51. [51]

    Watanabe, H

    M. Watanabe, H. Yoshimura, Experimental Investigation of Lagrangian Coherent Structures and Lobe Dynamics in Per- turbed Rayleigh-Benard Convection, in: Proceedings of the ASME 2021 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, 2021. doi:10.1115/FEDSM2021-64945. 46

    work page doi:10.1115/fedsm2021-64945 2021

  52. [52]

    M. F. M. Speetjens, Linear vs nonlinear transport during chaotic ad- vection in fluid flows, Chaos 32 (2022) 093113. doi:10.1063/5.0087258

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0087258 2022

  53. [53]

    Wiggins, The Dynamical Systems Approach to Lagrangian Trans- port in Oceanic Flows, Annu

    S. Wiggins, The Dynamical Systems Approach to Lagrangian Trans- port in Oceanic Flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37 (2005) 295–328. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175815

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175815 2005

  54. [54]

    Raynal, S

    F. Raynal, S. Wiggins, Lobe dynamics in a kinematic model of a me- andering jet. I. Geometry and statistics of transport and lobe dy- namics with accelerated convergence, Physica D 223 (2006) 7–25. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2006.07.021

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physd.2006.07.021 2006

  55. [55]

    P. C. du Toit, J. E. Marsden, Horseshoes in hurricanes, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 7 (2010) 351–384. doi:10.1007/s11784-010-0028-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11784-010-0028-6 2010

  56. [56]

    Oshima, T

    K. Oshima, T. Yanao, Jumping mechanisms of Trojan asteroids in the planar restricted three- and four-body problems, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 122 (2015) 53–74. doi:10.1007/s10569-015-9609-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10569-015-9609-4 2015

  57. [57]

    Krajˇ n´ ak, H

    V. Krajˇ n´ ak, H. Waalkens, Phase space structures causing the reaction rate decrease in the collinear hydrogen exchange reaction, J. Math. Chem. 58 (2020) 292–339. doi:10.1007/s10910-019-01083-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10910-019-01083-4 2020

  58. [58]

    Katsanikas, V

    M. Katsanikas, V. J. Garc´ ıa-Garrido, M. Agaoglou, S. Wiggins, Phase space analysis of the dynamics on a potential energy surface with an entrance channel and two potential wells, Phys. Rev. E 102 (2020) 012215. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.012215

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.102.012215 2020

  59. [59]

    Dellnitz, O

    M. Dellnitz, O. Junge, W. S. Koon, F. Lekien, M. W. Lo, J. E. Marsden, K. Padberg, R. Preis, S. D. Ross, B. Thiere, Transport in dynamical astronomy and multibody problems, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 15 (3) (2005) 699–727. doi:10.1142/S0218127405012545

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218127405012545 2005

  60. [60]

    S. Naik, F. Lekien, S. D. Ross, Computational method for phase space transport with applications to lobe dynamics and rate of escape, Regul. Chaot. Dyn. 22 (2017) 272–297. doi:10.1134/S1560354717030078

    work page doi:10.1134/s1560354717030078 2017

  61. [61]

    S. D. Ross, W. S. Koon, M. W. Lo, J. E. Marsden, Application of Dynamical Systems Theory to a Very Low Energy Transfer, in: 14th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Conference, Maui, HI, USA, AAS 04-289, 2004. Published in Adv. Astro. Sci. 119 (2005) 2991–3003. 47

    work page 2004

  62. [62]

    Grover, S

    P. Grover, S. Ross, Designing Trajectories in a Planet-Moon Environ- ment Using the Controlled Keplerian Map, J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 32 (2) (2009) 437–444. doi:10.2514/1.38320

    work page doi:10.2514/1.38320 2009

  63. [63]

    Odashima, K

    S. Odashima, K. Oshima, T. Yanao, Design of Earth–Moon transfer trajectories using multiple resonance gravity assists and invariant man- ifold tubes, in: 60th Space Sciences and Technology Conference, Hako- date, Japan, 2016 (In Japanese)

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Odashima, K

    S. Odashima, K. Oshima, T. Yanao, Design of Earth–Moon Trans- fer Trajectories Based on Dynamical Mechanisms of Resonant Gravity Assists, in: 61st Space Sciences and Technology Conference, Niigata, Japan, 2017 (In Japanese)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    B. V. Chirikov, A Universal Instability of Many-Dimensional Os- cillator Systems, Phys. Rep. 52 (1979) 263–379. doi:10.1016/0370- 1573(79)90023-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1979

  66. [66]

    Huang, Very Restricted Four-Body Problem, Tech

    S. Huang, Very Restricted Four-Body Problem, Tech. rep., NASA God- dard Space Flight Center (1960)

    work page 1960

  67. [67]

    K. K. Boudad, Trajectory Design between Cislunar Space and Sun– Earth Libration Points in a Four-Body Model, Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    E. J. Doedel, V. A. Romanov, R. C. Paffenroth, H. B. Keller, D. J. Dichmann, J. Gal´ an-Vioque, A. Vanderbauwhede, Elemental Peri- odic Orbits Associated with the Libration Points in the Circular Re- stricted 3-Body Problem, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 17 (8) (2007) 2625–2677. doi:10.1142/S0218127407018671

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218127407018671 2007

  69. [69]

    D. Qiao, J. Zheng, Y. Qi, Cislunar L4 and L5 axial or- bits and their applications, Acta Astronaut. 222 (2024) 457–470. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.06.025

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.06.025 2024

  70. [70]

    C. Chen, X. Li, D. Qiao, Stable configuration design for libration point gravitational wave observatory, Acta Astronaut. 226 (2025) 248–261. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.10.008. 48

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.10.008 2025

  71. [71]

    S. Pan, X. Hou, Review Article: Resonant Families of Periodic Orbits in the Restricted Three-body Problem, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 22 (7) (2022) 072002. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ac6aaa

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ac6aaa 2022

  72. [72]

    Rawat, B

    A. Rawat, B. Kumar, A. J. Rosengren, S. D. Ross, Cislunar Mean-Motion Resonances: Definitions, Widths, and Comparisons with Resonant Satellites, J. Guid. Contr. Dyn.(Articles in Advance). doi:10.2514/1.G009336

    work page doi:10.2514/1.g009336

  73. [73]

    Vaquero, K

    M. Vaquero, K. C. Howell, Design of transfer trajectories between res- onant orbits in the Earth–Moon restricted problem, Acta Astronaut. 94 (2014) 302–317. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.05.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.05.006 2014

  74. [74]

    R. L. Anderson, S. Campagnola, G. Lantoine, Broad search for unstable resonant orbits in the planar circular restricted three-body problem, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 124 (2016) 177–199. doi:10.1007/s10569-015- 9659-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s10569-015- 2016

  75. [75]

    R. F. Arenstorf, Existence of periodic solutions passing near both masses of the restricted three-body problem, AIAA Journal 1 (1) (1963) 238–240. doi:10.2514/3.1516

    work page doi:10.2514/3.1516 1963

  76. [76]

    Bonasera, N

    S. Bonasera, N. Bosanac, Computing Natural Transitions Between Tori Near Resonances in the Earth–Moon System, J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 46 (3) (2023) 443–454. doi:10.2514/1.G006941

    work page doi:10.2514/1.g006941 2023

  77. [77]

    R. L. Anderson, Tour Design Using Resonant-Orbit Invariant Manifolds in Patched Circular Restricted Three-Body Problems, J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. 44 (1) (2021) 106–119. doi:10.2514/1.G004999

    work page doi:10.2514/1.g004999 2021

  78. [78]

    Canales, M

    D. Canales, M. Gupta, B. Park, K. C. Howell, A transfer tra- jectory framework for the exploration of Phobos and Deimos leveraging resonant orbits, Acta Astronaut. 194 (2022) 263–276. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.02.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.02.001 2022

  79. [79]

    D. J. Dichmann, R. Lebois, J. P. Carrico, Dynamics of Orbits Near 3:1 Resonance in the Earth–Moon System, J. Astronaut. Sci. 60 (2013) 51–86. doi:10.1007/s40295-014-0009-x. 49

    work page doi:10.1007/s40295-014-0009-x 2013

  80. [80]

    J. J. K. Parker, R. L. Lebois, S. Lutz, C. Nickel, K. Ferrant, A. Michaels, Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) Flight Dy- namics Commissioning Results and Experiences, in: 2018 AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Snowbird, UT, USA, AAS 18- 408, 2018. Published in Adv. Astro. Sci. 167 (2019) 475–494

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.