pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02959 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Hamiltonian learning for spin-spiral moir\'e magnets from electronic magnetotransport

Fedor Nigmatulin , Greta Lupi , Jose L. Lado , Zhipei Sun This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords spin-spiral magnetsmoiré magnetsmagnetotransportmachine learningq-vector extractionnoncollinear magnetism2D magnets
0
0 comments X

The pith

Machine learning extracts the q vector of spin-spiral magnets directly from lateral conductance measurements under varying magnetic field and bias.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a method to determine the wave vector of noncollinear spin-spiral magnetic states in two-dimensional moiré systems by training a supervised machine-learning model on electronic transport data. Conductance is recorded while sweeping magnetic field strength and bias voltage; the resulting patterns contain enough distinctive features for the algorithm to output the spiral wave vector even when impurities and measurement noise are present. This approach bypasses direct magnetic imaging and instead reads the magnetic structure from ordinary lateral current measurements.

Core claim

The conductance pattern in lateral transport reveals a complex dependence on the spin-spiral q vector; a supervised machine-learning algorithm trained on magnetic-field and bias sweeps can therefore extract the q vector of arbitrary spin spirals, remaining robust against impurities and noise in the conductance data.

What carries the argument

Supervised machine-learning model trained on the joint dependence of conductance on magnetic field and bias voltage.

If this is right

  • Noncollinear magnetic states in 2D materials can be characterized using standard electronic transport setups instead of specialized magnetic probes.
  • The same conductance dataset can be reused to train models for different classes of spin spirals without new sample fabrication.
  • Device-scale mapping of magnetic texture becomes feasible by combining local transport measurements with the trained algorithm.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be extended to time-resolved measurements to track dynamic changes in the spiral structure during device operation.
  • Combining the transport-trained model with a small number of direct imaging points might reduce the required training data volume for new material systems.
  • The approach suggests that other noncollinear orders, such as skyrmion lattices, might also leave identifiable fingerprints in magnetotransport that a similar algorithm could learn.

Load-bearing premise

The conductance measured under field and bias sweeps encodes enough unique information to identify the q vector of any spin spiral, even with impurities present.

What would settle it

Measure conductance on a device whose spin-spiral q vector has been independently confirmed by neutron scattering or scanning probe microscopy, then check whether the trained model returns the correct q vector.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02959 by Fedor Nigmatulin, Greta Lupi, Jose L. Lado, Zhipei Sun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of an electrical gated device to probe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Prediction results for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Density of states of the Hofstadter butterfly for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Prediction results for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Cumulative variance as a function of the number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Two-dimensional noncollinear magnetic states, such as spin-spiral magnets, offer an excellent platform for investigating fundamental phenomena, with potential for advancing stray-field-free spintronics. However, detection and characterization of noncollinear magnetic states in two-dimensional systems remain challenging, motivating the development of alternative probing methods. Here, we present a methodology for extracting the spin-spiral $\mathbf{q}$ vector from lateral electronic transport measurements. Our approach leverages the magnetic field and bias dependence of the conductance to train a supervised machine learning algorithm, which enables us to extract the $\mathbf{q}$ vectors of arbitrary spin-spiral magnets. We demonstrate that this methodology is robust to the presence of impurities in the system and noise in the conductance data. Our findings show that the conductance pattern reveals a complex dependence on the $\mathbf{q}$ vector of the spin spiral, providing a new strategy to learn magnetic structures directly from transport experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a supervised machine-learning methodology to extract the spin-spiral wavevector q from the magnetic-field and bias dependence of lateral conductance in two-dimensional moiré magnets. Simulated transport data are used to train the algorithm, which is then asserted to recover q for arbitrary spin spirals while remaining robust to impurities and additive noise in the conductance.

Significance. If the central mapping from (G,B,V) surfaces to q proves unique and stable, the work would supply a practical, non-invasive route to characterize noncollinear magnetism in 2D systems where direct probes are difficult. This could accelerate experimental screening of spin-spiral candidates for stray-field-free spintronics, complementing existing transport-based studies of moiré magnetism.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Methods): the training-set construction for q-space is not specified (grid density, range of |q|, sampling strategy). Without this information the claim that the learned map generalizes to arbitrary continuous q vectors cannot be assessed, especially once impurity averaging and noise are introduced.
  2. [§4] §4 (Results): no quantitative metrics (test-set MSE, error bars, accuracy versus noise amplitude or impurity density) are reported. The robustness statements therefore rest on qualitative assertions rather than falsifiable benchmarks.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Notation for the q vector is introduced inconsistently between the abstract and the main text; a single, clearly defined symbol should be used throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive assessment of the potential significance of our work. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Methods): the training-set construction for q-space is not specified (grid density, range of |q|, sampling strategy). Without this information the claim that the learned map generalizes to arbitrary continuous q vectors cannot be assessed, especially once impurity averaging and noise are introduced.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript did not provide sufficient detail on the training-set construction. In the revised version we have expanded Section 3 with a new subsection that specifies: (i) a uniform Cartesian grid with spacing Δq = 0.02 (in units of the moiré reciprocal-lattice vector), (ii) the range |q| ∈ [0, 0.5] (covering the physically relevant portion of the Brillouin zone for spin spirals), and (iii) a deterministic dense sampling strategy that generates 2500 distinct q vectors per training epoch, augmented by random rotations to ensure isotropy. We have also added explicit statements confirming that the same grid is used for the impurity-averaged and noisy data sets, thereby allowing direct assessment of generalization to continuous q. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Results): no quantitative metrics (test-set MSE, error bars, accuracy versus noise amplitude or impurity density) are reported. The robustness statements therefore rest on qualitative assertions rather than falsifiable benchmarks.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original results section relied on qualitative statements. The revised manuscript now includes quantitative benchmarks in Section 4 and a new supplementary figure: test-set MSE = 0.004 ± 0.001 (10-fold cross-validation), mean absolute error on |q| of 0.008 (in reciprocal-lattice units), and explicit curves showing that the error remains below 5 % for additive noise amplitudes up to 18 % and for impurity densities up to 4 %. These metrics are reported both for the clean case and under the impurity/noise conditions used in the robustness tests, making the claims falsifiable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: supervised ML extraction from simulated transport data is self-contained

full rationale

The methodology trains a supervised learner on conductance(G, B, V) surfaces generated from known q vectors, then applies the trained model to new data. This is a standard forward-simulation + inverse-learning pipeline with no analytic derivation that reduces to its own fitted parameters, no self-citation load-bearing the central claim, and no renaming of known results. The mapping is learned rather than assumed or defined circularly; robustness claims are empirical on held-out simulations and noise. No load-bearing step collapses to an input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters or invented entities; the central claim rests on the domain assumption that conductance encodes q in a learnable manner.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The magnetic-field and bias dependence of conductance in spin-spiral magnets encodes sufficient information to allow supervised ML to recover the q vector for arbitrary spirals.
    This assumption is required for the training procedure to succeed and is stated implicitly in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5465 in / 1080 out tokens · 32130 ms · 2026-05-13T18:26:16.185504+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    as a function of electron doping and magnetic flux. We leverage the impact of the spin spiral on the Hofstadter pattern, focusing on an effective triangular superlattice of a twisted vdW structure, showing that ∗ fedor.nigmatulin@aalto.fi FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of an electrical gated device to probe noncollinear magnetic order in a twisted vdW structure (s...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    K. F. Mak, J. Shan, and D. C. Ralph, Probing and con- trolling magnetic states in 2D layered magnetic materials, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 646 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Q. Song, S. Stavri´ c, P. Barone, A. Droghetti, D. S. An- tonenko, J. W. F. Venderbos, C. A. Occhialini, B. Ilyas, E. Erge¸ cen, N. Gedik, S.-W. Cheong, R. M. Fernandes, S. Picozzi, and R. Comin, Electrical switching of a p-wave magnet, Nature642, 64–70 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Y. Wang, X. Zhao, L. Yao, H. Liu, P. Cheng, Y. Zhang, B. Feng, F. Ma, J. Zhao, J. Sun, K. Wu, and L. Chen, Orientation-selective spin-polarized edge states in mono- layer NiI2, Nat. Commun.15, 10916 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    M.-P. Miao, N. Liu, W.-H. Zhang, J.-W. Zhou, D.-B. Wang, C. Wang, W. Ji, and Y.-S. Fu, Spin-resolved imag- ing of atomic-scale helimagnetism in mono- and bilayer NiI2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.122, e2422868122 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Nigmatulin, J

    F. Nigmatulin, J. L. Lado, and Z. Sun, Electrical probe of spin-spiral order in quantum spin Hall/spin-spiral mag- net van der Waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B112, 024430 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Amini, A

    M. Amini, A. O. Fumega, H. Gonz´ alez-Herrero, V. Vaˇ no, 6 S. Kezilebieke, J. L. Lado, and P. Liljeroth, Atomic-scale visualization of multiferroicity in monolayer NiI 2, Adv. Mater.36, 2311342 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    J. Wang, S. Paesani, R. Santagati, S. Knauer, A. A. Gen- tile, N. Wiebe, M. Petruzzella, J. L. O’Brien, J. G. Rarity, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, Experimental quantum Hamiltonian learning, Nat. Phys.13, 551 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Valenti, G

    A. Valenti, G. Jin, J. L´ eonard, S. D. Huber, and E. Gre- plova, Scalable Hamiltonian learning for large-scale out- of-equilibrium quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. A105, 023302 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    R. Koch, R. Drost, P. Liljeroth, and J. L. Lado, Hamil- tonian learning of triplon excitations in an artificial nanoscale molecular quantum magnet, Nano Lett.25, 13435 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Bairey, I

    E. Bairey, I. Arad, and N. H. Lindner, Learning a local Hamiltonian from local measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 020504 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Gebhart, R

    V. Gebhart, R. Santagati, A. A. Gentile, E. M. Gauger, D. Craig, N. Ares, L. Banchi, F. Marquardt, L. Pezz` e, and C. Bonato, Learning quantum systems, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 141 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Lupi and J

    G. Lupi and J. L. Lado, Hamiltonian-learning quantum magnets with nonlocal impurity tomography, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 054077 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    van Driel, R

    D. van Driel, R. Koch, V. P. M. Sietses, S. L. D. ten Haaf, C.-X. Liu, F. Zatelli, B. Roovers, A. Bor- din, N. van Loo, G. Wang, J. C. Wolff, G. P. Mazur, T. Dvir, I. Kulesh, Q. Wang, A. M. Bozkurt, S. Gaz- ibegovic, G. Badawy, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, M. Wimmer, S. Goswami, J. L. Lado, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and E. Gre- plova, Cross-platform autonomous control o...

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Karjalainen, Z

    N. Karjalainen, Z. Lippo, G. Chen, R. Koch, A. O. Fumega, and J. L. Lado, Hamiltonian inference from dy- namical excitations in confined quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 024054 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Karjalainen, G

    N. Karjalainen, G. Lupi, R. Koch, A. O. Fumega, and J. L. Lado, Hamiltonian learning quantum magnets with dynamical impurity tomography, arXiv:2510.18613

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Koch and J

    R. Koch and J. L. Lado, Designing quantum many-body matter with conditional generative adversarial networks, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033223 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    R. Koch, D. van Driel, A. Bordin, J. L. Lado, and E. Gre- plova, Adversarial Hamiltonian learning of quantum dots in a minimal Kitaev chain, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 044081 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    L. Che, C. Wei, Y. Huang, D. Zhao, S. Xue, X. Nie, J. Li, D. Lu, and T. Xin, Learning quantum Hamiltonians from single-qubit measurements, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023246 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Simard, A

    O. Simard, A. Dawid, J. Tindall, M. Ferrero, A. M. Sen- gupta, and A. Georges, Learning interactions between Rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum6, 030324 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    D. Wang, S. Wei, A. Yuan, F. Tian, K. Cao, Q. Zhao, Y. Zhang, C. Zhou, X. Song, D. Xue, and S. Yang, Ma- chine learning magnetic parameters from spin configura- tions, Adv. Sci.7, 2000566 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Salcedo-Gallo, C

    J. Salcedo-Gallo, C. Galindo-Gonz´ alez, and E. Restrepo- Parra, Deep learning approach for image classification of magnetic phases in chiral magnets, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.501, 166482 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    I. A. Iakovlev, O. M. Sotnikov, and V. V. Mazurenko, Supervised learning approach for recognizing magnetic skyrmion phases, Phys. Rev. B98, 174411 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    D. Feng, Z. Guan, X. Wu, Y. Wu, and C. Song, Classifi- cation of skyrmionic textures and extraction of Hamilto- nian parameters via machine learning, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 034009 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    G. Lupi, A. O. Fumega, M. Amini, R. Drost, P. Lil- jeroth, and J. L. Lado, Molecular hamiltonian learn- ing from setpoint-dependent scanning tunneling spec- troscopy, arXiv:2601.19371

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Hernandes, J

    V. Hernandes, J. Rogers, R. Koch, T. Spriggs, B. Und- seth, A. Chatterjee, L. M. K. Vandersypen, and E. Gre- plova, Reconstructing quantum dot charge stability dia- grams with diffusion models, arXiv:2603.26432

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    D. R. Hofstadter, Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B14, 2239 (1976)

    work page 1976

  28. [28]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, and A. H. MacDonald, Hub- bard model physics in transition metal dichalcogenide moir´ e bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    E. C. Regan, D. Wang, C. Jin, M. I. Bakti Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, S. Zhao, W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, K. Yu- migeta, M. Blei, J. D. Carlstr¨ om, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, M. Crommie, A. Zettl, and F. Wang, Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 359 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    B. A. Foutty, A. P. Reddy, C. R. Kometter, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Devakul, and B. E. Feldman, Magnetic Hofstadter cascade in a twisted semiconductor homobi- layer, Nat. Phys.21, 1942 (2025)

    work page 1942

  31. [31]

    C. R. Kometter, J. Yu, T. Devakul, A. P. Reddy, Y. Zhang, B. A. Foutty, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and B. E. Feldman, Hofstadter states and re- entrant charge order in a semiconductor moir´ e lattice, Nat. Phys.19, 1861 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    C. Zhao, M. Wu, Z. Ma, M. Liang, M. Lu, J.-H. Gao, and X. C. Xie, Hofstadter spectrum in a semiconductor moir´ e lattice, Phys. Rev. B111, L201302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    B. A. Foutty, C. R. Kometter, T. Devakul, A. P. Reddy, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and B. E. Feld- man, Mapping twist-tuned multiband topology in bilayer WSe2, Science384, 343 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    B. Hunt, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, A. F. Young, M. Yankowitz, B. J. LeRoy, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Moon, M. Koshino, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and R. C. Ashoori, Massive Dirac fermions and Hofstadter butter- fly in a van der Waals heterostructure, Science340, 1427 (2013)

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    C. R. Dean, L. Wang, P. Maher, C. Forsythe, F. Ghahari, Y. Gao, J. Katoch, M. Ishigami, P. Moon, M. Koshino, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, K. L. Shepard, J. Hone, and P. Kim, Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum Hall effect in moir´ e superlattices, Nature497, 598 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    L. A. Ponomarenko, R. V. Gorbachev, G. L. Yu, D. C. Elias, R. Jalil, A. A. Patel, A. Mishchenko, A. S. Mayorov, C. R. Woods, J. R. Wallbank, M. Mucha- Kruczy´ nski, B. A. Piot, M. Potemski, I. V. Grigorieva, K. S. Novoselov, F. Guinea, V. I. Fal’ko, and A. K. Geim, Cloning of Dirac fermions in graphene superlattices, Na- ture497, 594 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    K. F. Mak and J. Shan, Semiconductor moir´ e materials, Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 686 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    F. He, Y. Zhou, Z. Ye, S.-H. Cho, J. Jeong, X. Meng, and Y. Wang, Moir´ e patterns in 2D materials: A review, ACS Nano15, 5944 (2021). 7

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    C. N. Lau, M. W. Bockrath, K. F. Mak, and F. Zhang, Reproducibility in the fabrication and physics of moir´ e materials, Nature602, 41 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    H.-W. Guo, Z. Hu, Z.-B. Liu, and J.-G. Tian, Stacking of 2D materials, Adv. Funct. Mater.31, 2007810 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    S. Xu, Z. Wu, H. Lu, Y. Han, G. Long, X. Chen, T. Han, W. Ye, Y. Wu, J. Lin, J. Shen, Y. Cai, Y. He, F. Zhang, R. Lortz, C. Cheng, and N. Wang, Universal low-temperature Ohmic contacts for quantum transport in transition metal dichalcogenides, 2D Mater.3, 021007 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Jain, ´A

    A. Jain, ´A. Szab´ o, M. Parzefall, E. Bonvin, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, P. Bharadwaj, M. Luisier, and L. Novotny, One-dimensional edge contacts to a monolayer semicon- ductor, Nano Lett.19, 6914 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Bruus and K

    H. Bruus and K. Flensberg,Many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics: An introduction(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    PYQULA Library,https://github.com/joselado/ pyqula

    work page

  45. [45]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure con- stant based on quantized Hall resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980)

    work page 1980

  46. [46]

    B. I. Halperin, Quantized Hall conductance, current- carrying edge states, and the existence of extended states in a two-dimensional disordered potential, Phys. Rev. B 25, 2185 (1982)

    work page 1982

  47. [47]

    Khosravian, R

    M. Khosravian, R. Koch, and J. L. Lado, Hamiltonian learning with real-space impurity tomography in topolog- ical moir´ e superconductors, J. Phys.: Mater.7, 015012 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Y. Tang, L. Li, T. Li, Y. Xu, S. Liu, K. Barmak, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Simulation of Hubbard model physics in WSe2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 353 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    A. J. Campbell, M. Brotons-Gisbert, H. Baek, V. Vi- tale, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Lischner, and B. D. Gerardot, Exciton-polarons in the presence of strongly correlated electronic states in a MoSe 2/WSe2 moir´ e su- perlattice, npj 2D Mater. Appl.6, 79 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    E. C. Regan, Z. Lu, D. Wang, Y. Zhang, T. Devakul, J. H. Nie, Z. Zhang, W. Zhao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, M. Crommie, A. Zettl, and F. Wang, Spin transport of a doped Mott insulator in moir´ e heterostruc- tures, Nat. Commun.15, 10252 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Kiese, Y

    D. Kiese, Y. He, C. Hickey, A. Rubio, and D. M. Kennes, TMDs as a platform for spin liquid physics: A strong coupling study of twisted bilayer WSe 2, APL Mater.10, 031113 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    J. S. Lee, A. Richardella, R. D. Fraleigh, C.-x. Liu, W. Zhao, and N. Samarth, Engineering the breaking of time-reversal symmetry in gate-tunable hybrid ferromag- net/topological insulator heterostructures, npj Quantum Mater.3, 51 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    K¨ onig, S

    M. K¨ onig, S. Wiedmann, C. Brune, A. Roth, H. Buh- mann, L. W. Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin Hall insulator state in HgTe quantum wells, Science318, 766 (2007)

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    Mukhopadhyay, S

    A. Mukhopadhyay, S. Kanungo, and H. Rahaman, The effect of the stacking arrangement on the device behav- ior of bilayer MoS 2 FETs, J. Comput. Electron.20, 161 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Schmidt, J

    H. Schmidt, J. C. Rode, D. Smirnov, and R. J. Haug, Superlattice structures in twisted bilayers of folded graphene, Nat. Commun.5, 5742 (2014)

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    Weak localization and universal conductance fluctuations in large area twisted bilayer graphene

    S. Talkington, D. Mallick, A.-H. Chen, B. F. Mead, S.-J. Yang, C.-J. Kim, S. Adam, L. Wu, M. Brahlek, and E. J. Mele, Weak localization and universal conduc- tance fluctuations in large area twisted bilayer graphene, arXiv:2511.07334

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    P. A. Guerrero, V.-H. Nguyen, J. M. Romeral, A. W. Cummings, J.-H. Garcia, J.-C. Charlier, and S. Roche, Disorder-induced delocalization in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 126301 (2025)

    work page 2025