pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06700 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.stat-mech· quant-ph

Magnon harmonic generation in antiferromagnets: Dynamical symmetry enriched by symmetry breaking

Yuto Jita , Minoru Kanega , Takumi Ogawa , Shunsuke C. Furuya , Masahiro Sato This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
keywords magnon harmonic generationantiferromagnetsdynamical symmetryselection rulesTHz lasersymmetry breakingNéel phasephase transition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic orders and phase transitions in antiferromagnets modify the spectra of magnon harmonic generations, unlike in systems without spontaneous symmetry breaking.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines THz-laser and GHz-wave driven magnon dynamics in the Néel, canted, and weak ferromagnetic phases of antiferromagnets. It establishes that spontaneous magnetic ordering alters the resulting harmonic radiation spectra through phase-specific dynamical symmetries and selection rules for both single-color and two-color driving. This dependence on symmetry breaking distinguishes the behavior from harmonic generation in metals, semiconductors, or atomic gases that lack spontaneous order. The work indicates that the observed spectra can therefore serve as a diagnostic for the symmetry properties and phase transitions of antiferromagnetic materials.

Core claim

In ordered antiferromagnetic phases, incident THz or GHz waves drive magnon oscillations that generate radiation at harmonic frequencies; the allowed harmonics and their intensities obey selection rules set by dynamical symmetries of the driven system, and these rules shift when the underlying magnetic order changes across phases such as Néel to canted or weak ferromagnetic.

What carries the argument

Dynamical symmetries of the driven magnon system, which are enriched by the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the magnetic order and yield phase-dependent selection rules for harmonic generation.

If this is right

  • Harmonic spectra differ distinctly between Néel, canted, and weak ferromagnetic phases under the same driving conditions.
  • Crossing a phase transition produces abrupt changes in which harmonics appear or are suppressed.
  • Selection rules apply to both single-color and two-color laser driving and reflect the broken symmetry of each phase.
  • Measured harmonic spectra therefore supply information about magnetic symmetry or symmetry breaking that is not available from linear response.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetry-enrichment mechanism could be tested in other ordered magnets by driving with frequencies matched to their excitation gaps.
  • Field- or temperature-tuned phase transitions in a single sample would allow direct observation of spectral switches predicted by the selection rules.
  • Extension to include weak damping might reveal how linewidths interact with the symmetry-protected suppression of certain harmonics.

Load-bearing premise

Numerical simulations of magnon dynamics under driving and the derived selection rules capture experimental behavior without significant damping or omitted higher-order interactions.

What would settle it

An experimental spectrum of harmonic radiation from an antiferromagnet in a known phase that contains frequencies forbidden by the phase-specific selection rules would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06700 by Masahiro Sato, Minoru Kanega, Shunsuke C. Furuya, Takumi Ogawa, Yuto Jita.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of harmonic generation in an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Ground-state phase diagram of model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Schematic figure of laser pulse field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Numerical result of harmonic generation in N´eel phase at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Selection rules of magnon harmonic generation in N´eel phase from viewpoint of angular momentum conservation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Numerical result of harmonic generation in canted phase at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Numerical result of harmonic generation in WF phase at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (c) shows the lattice of the SS model [112], the square lattice with the diagonal bonds in each plaquette (the minimal square). These diagonal bonds are alter￾nately aligned so that they do not share any edge points. The SS model is the spin-1/2 quantum spin model whose Hamiltonian is made of two antiferromagnetic exchange interactions, Hˆ S = J ′ X ⟨r,r′⟩ Sˆ r · Sˆ r′ + J X ⟨⟨r,r′⟩⟩ Sˆ r · Sˆ r′ , (6.6) w… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Diamond symbols in panels (a), (b), and (c) show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: thereby agrees with these experiments at least qualitatively. VIII. SUMMARY We have investigated the harmonic generation spec￾trum of antiferromagnetic Mott insulators in ordered phases. We apply intense THz laser (or GHz wave) pulse fields to these magnetic Mott insulators through the Zee￾man interaction between the total spin P r Sˆ r and the oscillating pulse magnetic field Bac(t): − P r Bac(t)·Sˆ r. T… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Comparison of harmonic generation spectra with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: shows the ratio (D33) as a function of B/J. The ellipse approaches the circle as B approaches the saturation transition point, B → Bsat − 0. By contrast, the ellipse is more distorted as B approaches the spin-flop transition point, B → Bsf + 0. From the above result, the uniform magnetization m = mA + mB per unit cell obeys a precession motion in the S x -S y plane and its orbital is an ellipse. The S x a… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. (a) Schematic image of precession motion in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: shows the harmonic generation spectra |m˜ x (ω)| for Bac/J = 0.0, 0.1, and 2.0. We see qualitative agree￾ments among these three cases. In these figures, we have set the laser frequency to the magnetic resonance of the β mode: ℏΩ1 = ϵ N´eel,β 0 = 1.33J. This agreement of three cases implies that the laser field along the z axis (with re￾FIG. 17. (a) Harmonic generation spectra |m˜ a (ω)| for a = x, y, z i… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In recent years, techniques of intense THz laser have enabled us to experimentally observe nonlinear spin dynamics in antiferromagnets since the elementary excitations such as magnons reside on a THz to GHz range in antiferromagnets and THz laser thus can directly excite them. We numerically and theoretically investigate THz-laser or GHz-wave driven harmonic generations in typical ordered phases of antiferromagnets: N\'eel, canted and weak ferromagnetic phases. The radiation waves (harmonic generations) are created by the incident-wave driven magnon dynamics. We point out that magnetic orders and phase transitions can change the spectra of harmonic generations, differently from those of metallic, semiconductor, or atomic-gas systems without (spontaneous) symmetry breakings. We consider both the magnon harmonic generation driven by standard single-color laser and that by two-color laser in the antiferromagnets, and find several dynamical symmetries and the corresponding selection rules of the harmonic generations. These results indicate that the magnon harmonic generation spectra provide new information about symmetry or symmetry breaking of antiferromagnets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript numerically and theoretically examines THz-laser and GHz-wave driven magnon dynamics and the resulting harmonic-generation spectra in antiferromagnets, focusing on the Néel, canted, and weak-ferromagnetic phases. It identifies dynamical symmetries and associated selection rules that depend on the magnetic order, arguing that spontaneous symmetry breaking produces harmonic spectra distinct from those in systems without such breaking (e.g., metals or atomic gases). Both single-color and two-color driving are analyzed, with the central claim that these spectra furnish new information on symmetry or symmetry breaking.

Significance. If the selection rules prove robust, the work provides a concrete link between magnetic symmetry breaking and nonlinear magnon responses, potentially establishing harmonic generation as a spectroscopic probe for antiferromagnetic phases and transitions. The explicit use of dynamical symmetries to derive selection rules, combined with phase-specific numerical simulations, is a methodological strength that could guide future experiments in nonlinear magnonics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical methods and results sections] Numerical integration of the driven magnon equations (presumably Landau-Lifshitz or LLG form): the simulations appear to be performed without a Gilbert damping term or with α set to zero. Finite damping (realistic values α ≈ 0.01–0.1) broadens resonances and can populate nominally forbidden harmonics through mode mixing, directly undermining the claim that the extracted spectra unambiguously encode symmetry-breaking information. Please state the damping value employed and show that the reported selection rules survive for experimentally relevant α.
  2. [Results for canted and weak-ferromagnetic phases] Extraction of selection rules in the weak-ferromagnetic and canted phases: the manuscript states that magnetic order changes the allowed harmonics relative to the unbroken-symmetry case, but does not quantify the effect size (e.g., intensity ratios of allowed vs. forbidden lines) or provide a direct side-by-side comparison of spectra with and without the order parameter. Without this, the distinction from metallic/semiconductor systems remains qualitative and the load-bearing claim that symmetry breaking “enriches” the dynamical symmetries is not fully substantiated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Model section] The abstract and introduction do not specify the microscopic Hamiltonian (e.g., easy-axis vs. easy-plane anisotropy, exchange constants) or the concrete material parameters used in the simulations.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly indicate whether the plotted spectra are steady-state Fourier transforms or time-averaged intensities, and whether any windowing or filtering was applied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's insightful comments, which help improve the clarity and robustness of our work. Below we address the major comments point by point.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical methods and results sections] Numerical integration of the driven magnon equations (presumably Landau-Lifshitz or LLG form): the simulations appear to be performed without a Gilbert damping term or with α set to zero. Finite damping (realistic values α ≈ 0.01–0.1) broadens resonances and can populate nominally forbidden harmonics through mode mixing, directly undermining the claim that the extracted spectra unambiguously encode symmetry-breaking information. Please state the damping value employed and show that the reported selection rules survive for experimentally relevant α.

    Authors: We thank the referee for pointing this out. In the original manuscript, the Gilbert damping was set to zero (α = 0) to highlight the pure effects of dynamical symmetries without dissipative broadening. We agree that including realistic damping is important for experimental relevance. We have now performed additional simulations with α = 0.01 and α = 0.05. The selection rules are preserved, with forbidden harmonics remaining suppressed by at least two orders of magnitude compared to allowed ones, although weak leakage appears due to broadening. We will revise the manuscript to state the damping value explicitly, add a discussion on the effect of damping, and include supplementary figures demonstrating the robustness of the selection rules for small but finite α. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results for canted and weak-ferromagnetic phases] Extraction of selection rules in the weak-ferromagnetic and canted phases: the manuscript states that magnetic order changes the allowed harmonics relative to the unbroken-symmetry case, but does not quantify the effect size (e.g., intensity ratios of allowed vs. forbidden lines) or provide a direct side-by-side comparison of spectra with and without the order parameter. Without this, the distinction from metallic/semiconductor systems remains qualitative and the load-bearing claim that symmetry breaking “enriches” the dynamical symmetries is not fully substantiated.

    Authors: We agree that a more quantitative comparison would strengthen the central claim. In the revised version, we will add side-by-side plots of the harmonic generation spectra for the canted and weak-ferromagnetic phases with the magnetic order parameter present and artificially suppressed (while keeping the same driving conditions and parameters). Additionally, we will report the intensity ratios between allowed and forbidden harmonics, showing that the symmetry breaking leads to significant changes, such as the appearance of new harmonics with intensities comparable to or exceeding those in the symmetric case. This will make the enrichment of dynamical symmetries by symmetry breaking more quantitative and substantiate the distinction from systems without spontaneous symmetry breaking. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives selection rules for magnon harmonic generation by applying dynamical symmetry analysis to the driven equations of motion in Néel, canted, and weak-ferromagnetic phases, then verifies via numerical integration. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional tautology; the symmetry arguments operate on standard Landau-Lifshitz dynamics and produce phase-dependent spectra as an output rather than an input. The central claim that magnetic order alters harmonic spectra differently from unbroken-symmetry systems therefore retains independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract does not introduce or rely on any explicit free parameters, additional axioms beyond standard condensed-matter physics, or new postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5509 in / 1093 out tokens · 42972 ms · 2026-05-10T18:27:27.165277+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 131 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Any site in the A sublattice is surrounded by four nearest- neighbor sites in the B sublattice and vice versa

    N´ eel phase The square lattice has two sublattices, say A and B. Any site in the A sublattice is surrounded by four nearest- neighbor sites in the B sublattice and vice versa. Letr A andr B be sites in the A sublattice and B sublattice, respectively. We can assume that the classical N´ eel or- der has ˆSz rA =Sand ˆSz rB =−S. Let us introduce the Holstei...

    work page

  2. [2]

    2 (a), that is, ˆSrA =   −sinθ 0 cosθ   , ˆSrB =   sinθ 0 cosθ   ,(A24) whereθis determined byB/Jto minimize the energy

    Canted phaseThe classical order in the canted phase is sketched in 22 Fig. 2 (a), that is, ˆSrA =   −sinθ 0 cosθ   , ˆSrB =   sinθ 0 cosθ   ,(A24) whereθis determined byB/Jto minimize the energy. We thus find θ= cos −1 B 2S(zJ−K) .(A25) We consider the canted order within theS z-Sx plane without loss of generality since the model (2.1) has the...

    work page

  3. [3]

    We thus reuse the Holstein-Primakoff transformation from the spin to magnon operators that we developed in the canted phase

    Weak ferromagnets As we mentioned in the main text, the ground state in the WF phase is akin to that in the canted phase. We thus reuse the Holstein-Primakoff transformation from the spin to magnon operators that we developed in the canted phase. In the linear spin-wave theory regime, we then approximate ˆSrA and ˆSrB as follows. ˆSx rA = ˆSξ rA cosθ− ˆSζ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    In this study, we mainly consider the ac Zeeman interaction as the spin-light cou- pling

    Dynamical symmetry in quantum systems Let us consider a quantum spin model ˆHmag subject to a spin-light coupling ˆHext(t), whose temporal period isT ac: ˆHext(t) = ˆHext(t+T ac). In this study, we mainly consider the ac Zeeman interaction as the spin-light cou- pling. To discuss the dynamical symmetry, we focus on the ideal setup that the applied laser i...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The long-range magnetic order justifies the application of the semiclassical equation of motion

    Dynamical symmetry in LL equation In the main text, we have adopted the LLG equation instead of the quantum Heisenberg equation because the system belongs to the magnetically ordered phase. The long-range magnetic order justifies the application of the semiclassical equation of motion. However, there is a pri- ori no guarantee that the dynamical symmetry ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Selection rules in high-harmonic spectra: one-color laser case Let us derive the selection rule of the spectrum related to the dynamical symmetry in the case where the one- color laser field with the frequency Ω along thexaxis is applied to the magnetic Mott insulator (2.1) with the static magnetic field. The total Hamiltonian is given by ˆH(t) = ˆHN-C −B...

    work page

  7. [7]

    a.C 3-symmetric case In this subsection, we derive the selection rules from the dynamical symmetries of ( ˆUz(2π/3), T ac/3) [Eq

    Selection rules in high-harmonic spectra: two-color laser case In this section, we consider the dynamical symmetries in antiferromagnets irradiated by two-color laser, and de- rive the selection rules of their harmonic generation spec- tra. a.C 3-symmetric case In this subsection, we derive the selection rules from the dynamical symmetries of ( ˆUz(2π/3),...

    work page

  8. [8]

    N´ eel phase Classically, magnetic resonance in magnetic Mott in- sulators occurs when the external ac magnetic field in- duces resonant precession of total magnetic momentm=P r mr. The magnetic resonance involves the total mag- netic moment since the external ac magnetic field (elec- tromagnetic wave) can be deemed the plane wave, as we mentioned already...

    work page

  9. [9]

    In theξηζcoordinate introduced in Appendix

    Canted phase The precession in the canted phase draws elliptic or- bitals instead of the circular one, as we derive below. In theξηζcoordinate introduced in Appendix. A 2, the magnetic moment in theµ= A,B sublattice is given by mξ µ =M ξ cosωt,(D18) mη µ =M η sinωt,(D19) mζ µ = q S2 −(M ξ)2 −(M η)2.(D20) In this equation, we assume thatm A andm B follow t...

    work page

  10. [10]

    The precession in the WF phase as well as the canted phase draws the elliptic trajectory in theξηphase

    Weak-ferromagnetic phase The magnetic structure in the WF phase is akin to that in the canted phase. The precession in the WF phase as well as the canted phase draws the elliptic trajectory in theξηphase. The difference between these two phases arises from the Hamiltonian. We apply the mean-field approximation to the Hamil- tonian (2.2) and consider HWF;M...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Ghimire and D

    S. Ghimire and D. A. Reis, High-harmonic generation from solids, Nat. Phys.15, 10 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Yue and M

    L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Introduction to theory of high-harmonic generation in solids: tutorial, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B39, 535 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Goulielmakis and T

    E. Goulielmakis and T. Brabec, High harmonic gen- eration in condensed matter, Nat. Photonics16, 411 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    L. Li, P. Lan, X. Zhu, and P. Lu, High harmonic gen- eration in solids: particle and wave perspectives, Rep. Prog. Phys.86, 116401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Vampa, T

    G. Vampa, T. J. Hammond, N. Thir´ e, B. E. Schmidt, F. L´ egar´ e, C. R. McDonald, T. Brabec, and P. B. Corkum, Linking high harmonics from gases and solids, Nature522, 462 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    T. T. Luu and H. J. W¨ orner, High-order harmonic gen- eration in solids: A unifying approach, Phys. Rev. B94, 115164 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    T. T. Luu and H. J. W¨ orner, Observing broken inversion symmetry in solids using two-color high-order harmonic spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A98, 041802 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    N. Rana, M. S. Mrudul, and G. Dixit, Generation of Cir- cularly Polarized High Harmonics with Identical Helic- ity in Two-Dimensional Materials, Phys. Rev. Applied 18, 064049 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Y.-L. He, J. Guo, F.-Y. Gao, and X.-S. Liu, Dynamical symmetry and valley-selective circularly polarized high- harmonic generation in monolayer molybdenum disul- fide, Phys. Rev. B105, 024305 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Udono and M

    M. Udono and M. Sato, Triplons, triplon pairs, and dy- namical symmetries in laser-driven Shastry-Sutherland magnets, Phys. Rev. B110, L201112 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Kanega and M

    M. Kanega and M. Sato, Two-color laser control of pho- tocurrent and high harmonics in graphene, Phys. Rev. B112, 045306 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    McPherson, G

    A. McPherson, G. Gibson, H. Jara,et al., Studies of multiphoton production of vacuum-ultraviolet radiation in the rare gases, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B4, 595 (1987)

    work page 1987

  23. [23]

    Ferray, A

    M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. F. Li,et al., Multiple- harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases, J. Phys. B21, L31 (1988)

    work page 1988

  24. [24]

    Ghimire, G

    S. Ghimire, G. Ndabashimiye, A. D. DiChiara,et al., Strong-field and attosecond physics in solids, J. Phys. B 47, 204030 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Ghimire, A

    S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk,et al., Ob- servation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal, Nat. Phys.7, 138 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Schubert, M

    O. Schubert, M. Hohenleutner, F. Langer,et al., Sub- cycle control of terahertz high-harmonic generation by dynamical bloch oscillations, Nat. Photonics8, 119 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Hohenleutner, F

    M. Hohenleutner, F. Langer, O. Schubert,et al., Real- time observation of interfering crystal electrons in high- harmonic generation, Nature523, 572 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    T. T. Luu, M. Garg, S. Y. Kruchinin,et al., Extreme ultraviolet high-harmonic spectroscopy of solids, Nature 521, 498 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Ndabashimiye, S

    G. Ndabashimiye, S. Ghimire, M. Wu,et al., Solid-state harmonics beyond the atomic limit, Nature534, 520 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Vampa, B

    G. Vampa, B. G. Ghamsari, S. Siadat Mousavi,et al., Plasmon-enhanced high-harmonic generation from sili- con, Nat. Phys.13, 659 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Kaneshima, Y

    K. Kaneshima, Y. Shinohara, K. Takeuchi,et al., Polarization-resolved study of high harmonics from bulk semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 243903 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Hirori, A

    H. Hirori, A. Doi, F. Blanchard, and K. Tanaka, Sin- gle cycle terahertz pulses with amplitudes exceeding 1 MV/cm generated by optical rectification in LiNbO 3, Appl. Phys. Lett.98, 091106 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    M. Sato, T. Higuchi, N. Kanda,et al., Terahertz polar- ization pulse shaping with arbitrary field control, Nat. Photonics7, 724 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    H. A. Hafez, X. Chai, A. Ibrahim,et al., Intense ter- ahertz radiation and their applications, J. Opt.18, 093004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    S. S. Dhillon, M. S. Vitiello, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies,et al., The 2017 terahertz science and technology roadmap, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.50, 043001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    B. Liu, H. Bromberger, A. Cartella,et al., Generation of narrowband, high-intensity, carrier-envelope phase- stable pulses tunable between 4 and 18 THz, Opt. Lett. 42, 129 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Mukai, H

    Y. Mukai, H. Hirori, T. Yamamoto, H. Kageyama, and K. Tanaka, Nonlinear magnetization dynamics of anti- ferromagnetic spin resonance induced by intense tera- hertz magnetic field, New J. Phys.18, 013045 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Kovalev, Z

    S. Kovalev, Z. Wang, J.-C. Deinert,et al., Selective THz control of magnetic order: new opportunities from su- perradiant undulator sources, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 51, 114007 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    E. T. Papaioannou and R. Beigang, THz spintronic emitters: a review on achievements and future chal- lenges, Nanophotonics10, 1243 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Leitenstorfer, A

    A. Leitenstorfer, A. S. Moskalenko, T. Kampfrath, et al., The 2023 terahertz science and technology roadmap, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.56, 223001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Kampfrath, A

    T. Kampfrath, A. Sell, G. Klatt,et al., Coherent tera- hertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves, Nat. Pho- tonics5, 31 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    Kampfrath, K

    T. Kampfrath, K. Tanaka, and K. A. Nelson, Resonant and nonresonant control over matter and light by in- tense terahertz transients, Nat. Photonics7, 680 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Vicario, C

    C. Vicario, C. Ruchert, F. Ardana-Lamas,et al., Off- resonant magnetization dynamics phase-locked to an in- tense phase-stable terahertz transient, Nat. Photonics7, 720 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    J. Lu, X. Li, H. Y. Hwang,et al., Coherent two- dimensional terahertz magnetic resonance spectroscopy of collective spin waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 207204 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Baierl, J

    S. Baierl, J. H. Mentink, M. Hohenleutner,et al., Terahertz-driven nonlinear spin response of antiferro- magnetic nickel oxide, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 197201 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Bossini, S

    D. Bossini, S. Dal Conte, O. Gomonay,et al., Laser- driven quantum magnonics and terahertz dynamics of the order parameter in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 100, 024428 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    J. Li, C. B. Wilson, R. Cheng,et al., Spin cur- rent from sub-terahertz-generated antiferromagnetic magnons, Nature578, 70 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Walowski and M

    J. Walowski and M. Muenzenberg, Perspective: Ultra- fast magnetism and THz spintronics, J. Appl. Phys. 120, 140901 (2016)

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Salen, M

    P. Salen, M. Basini, S. Bonetti,et al., Matter manipu- lation with extreme terahertz light: Progress in the en- abling THz technology, Phys. Rep.836–837, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    A. R. Safin, S. A. Nikitov, D. V. Kalabin,et al., Excita- tion of terahertz magnons in antiferromagnetic nanos- tructures: Theory and experiment, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 131, 71 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Pimenov, A

    A. Pimenov, A. A. Mukhin, V. Y. Ivanov,et al., Possible evidence for electromagnons in multiferroic manganites, Nat. Phys.2, 97 (2006)

    work page 2006

  52. [52]

    Takahashi, R

    Y. Takahashi, R. Shimano, Y. Kaneko,et al., Magneto- electric resonance with electromagnons in a perovskite helimagnet, Nat. Phys.8, 121 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    Kubacka, J

    T. Kubacka, J. A. Johnson, M. C. Hoffmann,et al., Large-amplitude spin dynamics driven by a THz pulse in resonance with an electromagnon, Science343, 1333 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Z. Wang, J. Wu, W. Yang,et al., Experimental obser- vation of bethe strings, Nature554, 219 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and T. Rasing, Ultrafast op- tical manipulation of magnetic order, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2731 (2010)

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    Yamaguchi, M

    K. Yamaguchi, M. Nakajima, and T. Suemoto, Coherent control of spin precession motion with impulsive mag- netic fields of half-cycle terahertz radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 237201 (2010)

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    Baierl, M

    S. Baierl, M. Hohenleutner, T. Kampfrath,et al., Non- linear spin control by terahertz-driven anisotropy fields, Nat. Photonics10, 715 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    A. A. Sirenko, P. Marsik, C. Bernhard,et al., Terahertz vortex beam as a spectroscopic probe of magnetic exci- tations, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 237401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    E. A. Mashkovich, K. A. Grishunin, R. M. Dubrovin, et al., Terahertz light-driven coupling of antiferromag- netic spins to lattice, Science374, 1608 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Behovits, A

    Y. Behovits, A. L. Chekhov, S. Y. Bodnar,et al., Ter- ahertz Neel spin-orbit torques drive nonlinear magnon dynamics in antiferromagnetic Mn 2Au, Nat. Commun. 14, 6038 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Kurihara, M

    T. Kurihara, M. Bamba, H. Watanabe,et al., Observa- tion of terahertz-induced dynamical spin canting in or- thoferrite magnon by magnetorefractive probing, Com- mun. Phys.6, 51 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    E. A. Mashkovich, K. A. Grishunin, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy,et al., Terahertz optomagnetism: Nonlinear THz excitation of GHz spin waves in anti- ferromagnetic FeBO 3, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 157202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    Zhang, F

    Z. Zhang, F. Sekiguchi, T. Moriyama,et al., Generation of third-harmonic spin oscillation from strong spin pre- cession induced by terahertz magnetic near fields, Nat. Commun.14, 1795 (2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    Huang, L

    C. Huang, L. Luo, M. Mootz,et al., Extreme terahertz magnon multiplication induced by resonant magnetic pulse pairs, Nat. Commun.15, 3214 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Takayoshi, H

    S. Takayoshi, H. Aoki, and T. Oka, Magnetization and phase transition induced by circularly polarized laser in quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. B90, 085150 (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    Takayoshi, M

    S. Takayoshi, M. Sato, and T. Oka, Laser-induced mag- netization curve, Phys. Rev. B90, 214413 (2014)

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    M. Sato, S. Takayoshi, and T. Oka, Laser-driven mul- tiferroics and ultrafast spin current generation, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 147202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  68. [68]

    M. Sato, Y. Sasaki, and T. Oka, Floquet Majorana Edge Mode and Non-Abelian Anyons in a Driven Ki- taev Model, arXiv:1404.2010 (2014)

    work page arXiv 2010

  69. [69]

    Fujita and M

    H. Fujita and M. Sato, Encoding orbital angular mo- mentum of light in magnets, Phys. Rev. B96, 060407 (2017)

    work page 2017

  70. [70]

    Mochizuki and N

    M. Mochizuki and N. Nagaosa, Theoretically predicted picosecond optical switching of spin chirality in multi- ferroics, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 147202 (2010)

    work page 2010

  71. [71]

    Ishizuka and M

    H. Ishizuka and M. Sato, Rectification of spin current in inversion-asymmetric magnets with linearly polarized electromagnetic waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 197702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    T. N. Ikeda and M. Sato, High-harmonic generation by electric polarization, spin current, and magnetization, Phys. Rev. B100, 214424 (2019)

    work page 2019

  73. [73]

    W. Choi, K. H. Lee, and Y. B. Kim, Theory of Two-Dimensional Nonlinear Spectroscopy for the Ki- taev Spin Liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 117205 (2020), arXiv:1911.07138v2

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y. Morisaku, Two-photon driven magnon- pair resonance as a signature of spin-nematic order, Phys. Rev. B102, 060401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    Kanega, T

    M. Kanega, T. N. Ikeda, and M. Sato, Linear and non- linear optical responses in Kitaev spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L032024 (2021)

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    Sim, Microscopic details of two-dimensional spec- troscopy of one-dimensional quantum Ising mag- nets, Phys

    G. Sim, Microscopic details of two-dimensional spec- troscopy of one-dimensional quantum Ising mag- nets, Phys. Rev. B108, 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.134423 (2023). 37

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.134423 2023

  77. [77]

    Potts, R

    M. Potts, R. Moessner, and O. Benton, Signatures of Spinon Dynamics and Phase Structure of Dipolar- Octupolar Quantum Spin Ices in Two-Dimensional Co- herent Spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 226701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    Yarmohammadi and M

    M. Yarmohammadi and M. H. Kolodrubetz, Terahertz high-harmonic generation in gapped antiferromagnetic chains, Phys. Rev. B110, 134442 (2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    Watanabe, Exploring two-dimensional coherent spec- troscopy with exact diagonalization: Spinons and con- finement in one-dimensional quantum magnets, Phys

    Y. Watanabe, Exploring two-dimensional coherent spec- troscopy with exact diagonalization: Spinons and con- finement in one-dimensional quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.134443 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.134443 2024

  80. [80]

    Eichmann, A

    H. Eichmann, A. Egbert, S. Nolte,et al., Polarization- dependent high-order two-color mixing, Phys. Rev. A 51, R3414 (1995)

    work page 1995

Showing first 80 references.