pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08376 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.chem-ph

Theory-Guided Discovery of Pressure-Induced Transitions in Fast-Ion Conductor BaSnF4

Robin Turnbull , Zhang YingLong , Claudio Cazorla , Akun Liang , Rahman Saqib , Miriam Pena-Alvarez , Catalin Popescu , Laura Pampillo
show 1 more author
Daniel Errandonea
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-ph
keywords BaSnF4fast-ion conductorhigh-pressure phase transitionsdensity functional theoryRaman spectroscopyX-ray diffractionsolid-state electrolytes
0
0 comments X

The pith

DFT and high-pressure experiments together show BaSnF4 passes through two structural changes at 10 GPa and 32 GPa.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper combines density functional theory calculations with room-temperature X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and resistivity measurements to map how BaSnF4 rearranges its atoms when compressed. Theory locates a shift from the ambient tetragonal structure into a first monoclinic form near 10 GPa, followed by a second, denser monoclinic form near 32 GPa. The first change is directly observed in the diffraction patterns and in the way the material scatters light and conducts electricity. The second change appears as abrupt shifts in Raman peaks and resistivity that match the calculated reorganization. If both transitions occur, pressure becomes a practical lever for altering the pathways that fluoride ions take through the crystal.

Core claim

Density functional theory predicts that BaSnF4 transforms from its ambient-pressure tetragonal P4/nmm phase into a monoclinic P21/m-I structure at 10 GPa and then into a denser monoclinic P21/m-II structure at 32 GPa. Angle-dispersive X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and electrical resistivity measurements at ambient temperature confirm the first transition and register distinct changes in vibrational modes and resistivity at the pressure where the second transition is expected, consistent with further structural reorganization.

What carries the argument

The two successive pressure-driven transitions between the tetragonal P4/nmm phase and the monoclinic P21/m-I and P21/m-II phases, located by comparing DFT enthalpies and tracked by changes in diffraction, Raman spectra, and resistivity.

If this is right

  • The 10 GPa transition is fully verified by three independent experimental probes and therefore alters the material's lattice and ion pathways under moderate compression.
  • Distinct Raman mode shifts and resistivity jumps at 32 GPa align with the calculated denser monoclinic phase and indicate an additional reorganization of the fluoride sublattice.
  • Both transitions occur within the pressure range accessible to diamond-anvil cells, so they supply a concrete map for testing pressure-tuned ionic conductivity in fluorostannate electrolytes.
  • The combined theory-experiment approach resolves the high-pressure phase sequence up to 40 GPa and supplies starting structures for further transport calculations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the second monoclinic phase opens or blocks particular fluoride diffusion channels, high-pressure synthesis followed by quenching could lock in a room-pressure material with modified conductivity.
  • The same DFT-plus-spectroscopy workflow could be applied to chemically related fast-ion conductors to locate pressure windows where ionic transport is enhanced or suppressed.
  • Because the transitions are driven by enthalpy differences rather than temperature, they suggest that modest pressures might be used to switch between low- and high-conductivity states in solid-electrolyte devices.

Load-bearing premise

The changes in Raman modes and resistivity observed near 32 GPa mark the second monoclinic phase even though no diffraction pattern directly confirms the atomic arrangement at that pressure.

What would settle it

If angle-dispersive X-ray diffraction above 32 GPa reveals a crystal structure different from the predicted P21/m-II or shows no new Bragg peaks while Raman and resistivity remain continuous, the second transition claim would be ruled out.

read the original abstract

Fast-ion conductors such as BaSnF4 are of significant interest for next-generation solid-state battery technologies due to their high ionic conductivity and chemical stability. However, the behaviour of these materials under extreme conditions remains poorly understood, despite the relevance of pressure-induced modifications for tuning functional properties. In this study, we combine density functional theory (DFT) calculations with high-pressure experiments to investigate the structural evolution of BaSnF4 up to 40 GPa. DFT predicts two pressure-induced phase transitions: from the ambient-pressure tetragonal P4/nmm phase to a monoclinic P21/m-I structure at 10 GPa, and subsequently to a denser monoclinic P21/m-II phase at 32 GPa. The first transition is experimentally confirmed via angle-dispersive X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and electrical resistivity measurements, all performed at ambient temperature. The second transition is supported by distinct changes in high-pressure Raman modes and resistivity behaviour, consistent with a further structural reorganization. These findings not only clarify the high-pressure phase diagram of BaSnF4, but also shed light on the potential for pressure-tuned ionic transport in fluorostannate-based solid electrolytes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses DFT calculations to predict two pressure-induced phase transitions in BaSnF4: from the ambient tetragonal P4/nmm structure to a monoclinic P21/m-I phase at ~10 GPa, followed by a transition to a denser monoclinic P21/m-II phase at ~32 GPa. The first transition is experimentally validated at ambient temperature by angle-dispersive XRD (matching predicted lattice parameters), Raman spectroscopy, and electrical resistivity measurements up to 40 GPa; the second transition is inferred from discontinuities in Raman mode frequencies and resistivity behavior.

Significance. If the full set of claims holds, the work would provide a clear example of theory-guided discovery in a fast-ion conductor relevant to solid-state electrolytes, with the multi-technique confirmation of the first transition offering strong external validation of the DFT enthalpy landscape. The identification of pressure as a tuning parameter for structural reorganization could inform strategies for modulating ionic transport, though the conditional nature of the higher-pressure claim limits immediate impact.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and high-pressure experimental results] Abstract and the section on high-pressure phase identification: the assignment of the ~32 GPa discontinuity to the specific DFT-predicted P21/m-II structure rests solely on Raman mode shifts and resistivity changes. Unlike the first transition (where angle-dispersive XRD directly confirms the P21/m-I lattice), no structural data anchor the second transition. Raman and transport signatures can arise from multiple mechanisms (e.g., anion disorder or an alternative space group), so they do not uniquely establish the claimed monoclinic phase. This is load-bearing for the headline result of two distinct transitions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: quantitative agreement metrics (e.g., RMS deviation between DFT and experimental lattice parameters or transition pressures with uncertainties) are not reported, making it difficult to assess the precision of the DFT-experiment match for the confirmed transition.
  2. [Methods and figure captions] Figure captions and methods: pressure calibration details and any error bars on the reported transition pressures (10 GPa and 32 GPa) should be stated explicitly to allow readers to evaluate the precision of the experimental onsets.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major concern regarding the strength of evidence for the second phase transition below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and high-pressure experimental results] Abstract and the section on high-pressure phase identification: the assignment of the ~32 GPa discontinuity to the specific DFT-predicted P21/m-II structure rests solely on Raman mode shifts and resistivity changes. Unlike the first transition (where angle-dispersive XRD directly confirms the P21/m-I lattice), no structural data anchor the second transition. Raman and transport signatures can arise from multiple mechanisms (e.g., anion disorder or an alternative space group), so they do not uniquely establish the claimed monoclinic phase. This is load-bearing for the headline result of two distinct transitions.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the second transition lacks direct structural confirmation by angle-dispersive XRD, in contrast to the first transition at ~10 GPa. The current assignment of the ~32 GPa discontinuity to the DFT-predicted P21/m-II phase relies on the alignment of observed changes in Raman mode frequencies and resistivity with the calculated transition pressure and the predicted denser monoclinic structure. While these indirect signatures are consistent with a further structural reorganization, we acknowledge that they are not unique and could arise from alternative mechanisms such as anion disorder. In the revised manuscript, we will update the abstract and the high-pressure phase identification section to explicitly describe the second transition as inferred from the combination of experimental discontinuities and theoretical enthalpy calculations, rather than directly confirmed. We will also expand the discussion to note the limitations of the indirect evidence and recommend future high-pressure XRD experiments above 30 GPa for structural verification. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; DFT predictions are independent first-principles results validated by separate experiments.

full rationale

The paper's chain consists of ab initio DFT enthalpy calculations predicting two pressure-induced transitions (P4/nmm to P21/m-I at 10 GPa, then to P21/m-II at 32 GPa), followed by independent experimental measurements (angle-dispersive XRD confirming the first transition, plus Raman and resistivity supporting the second). No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations reduce the claimed structures or transition pressures to the experimental data by construction. The second transition is presented only as consistent with spectroscopic changes rather than uniquely derived from them. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DFT approximations for structure prediction and the assumption that Raman/resistivity changes map directly to the computed phases; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard DFT exchange-correlation functionals and pseudopotentials accurately capture relative energies of BaSnF4 polymorphs under pressure
    Invoked to predict the 10 GPa and 32 GPa transitions

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5544 in / 1238 out tokens · 47043 ms · 2026-05-10T16:58:01.520149+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Origin of fast ion diffusion in super-ionic conductors

    He, X., et al. Origin of fast ion diffusion in super-ionic conductors. Nat. Commun. 8, 15893 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15893

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms15893 2017

  2. [2]

    and V olkov, S.V ., 2001

    V oronin, B.M. and V olkov, S.V ., 2001. Ionic conductivity of fluorite type crystals CaF2, SrF2, BaF2, and SrCl2 at high temperatures. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 62(7), pp.1349-1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(01)00036-1

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-3697(01)00036-1 2001

  3. [3]

    And Parris, J.M., 2021

    Dénès, G., Muntasar, A., Madamba, M.C. And Parris, J.M., 2021. Tin (Ii)-Containing Fluoride Ion Conductors: How Tin Multiplies The Fluoride Ion Conduction By Up To Three Orders Of Magnitude. Wit Transactions On Engineering Sciences, 133, Pp.167- 176. DOI not available

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    and Salanne, M., 2023

    Lian, X. and Salanne, M., 2023. Capturing the interactions in the BaSnF4 ionic conductor: Comparison between a machine -learning potential and a polarizable force field. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 159(14). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0169343 28

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0169343 2023

  5. [5]

    Sagotra, A. K. and Cazorla, C. Stress-mediated enhancement of ionic conductivity in fast-ion conductors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 38773 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b11687

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.7b11687 2017

  6. [6]

    and Errandonea, D

    Cazorla, C. and Errandonea, D. Superionicity and polymorphism in calcium fluoride at high pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 235902 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.235902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.235902 2014

  7. [7]

    and Errandonea, D

    Cazorla, C. and Errandonea, D. Giant mechanocaloric effects in fluorite-structured superionic materials. Nano Lett. 16, 3124 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00422

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00422 2016

  8. [8]

    Mechanocaloric effects in superionic thin films from atomistic simulations

    Sagotra, A.K., Errandonea, D., et al. Mechanocaloric effects in superionic thin films from atomistic simulations. Nat. Commun. 8, 963 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01081-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01081-7 2017

  9. [9]

    and Hariharan, K., 2011

    Patro, L.N. and Hariharan, K., 2011. Influence of synthesis methodology on the ionic transport properties of BaSnF4. Materials Research Bulletin, 46(5), pp.732-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.01.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.01.010 2011

  10. [10]

    and Jacobsen, S.D., 2007

    Angel, R.J., Bujak, M., Zhao, J., Gatta, G.D. and Jacobsen, S.D., 2007. Effective hydrostatic limits of pressure media for high-pressure crystallographic studies. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 40(1), pp.26-32. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889806045523

    work page doi:10.1107/s0021889806045523 2007

  11. [11]

    Powder Diffr

    Fauth, F., Peral, I., Popescu, C. and Knapp, M., 2013. The new material science powder diffraction beamline at ALBA synchrotron. Powder Diffraction, 28(S2), pp. S360-S370. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0885715613000900

    work page doi:10.1017/s0885715613000900 2013

  12. [12]

    Zr-based bulk metallic glass as a cylinder material for high pressure apparatuses

    Prescher, C. and Prakapenka, V .B., 2015. DIOPTAS: a program for reduction of two- dimensional X-ray diffraction data and data exploration. High Pressure Research, 35(3), pp.223-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957959.2015.1059835

    work page doi:10.1080/08957959.2015.1059835 2015

  13. [13]

    and Kleeberg, R., 2015

    Doebelin, N. and Kleeberg, R., 2015. Profex: a graphical user interface for the Rietveld refinement program BGMN. Journal of applied crystallography, 48(5), pp.1573- 1580. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576715014685

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600576715014685 2015

  14. [14]

    Staško; J

    Shen, G., Wang, Y ., Dewaele, A., Wu, C., Fratanduono, D.E., Eggert, J., Klotz, S., Dziubek, K.F., Loubeyre, P., Fat’yanov, O.V . and Asimow , P.D., 2020. Toward an international practical pressure scale: A proposal for an IPPS ruby gauge (IPPS - Ruby2020). High Pressure Research, 40(3), pp.299-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957959.2020.1791107

    work page doi:10.1080/08957959.2020.1791107 2020

  15. [15]

    and Kawamura, H., 2006

    Akahama, Y . and Kawamura, H., 2006. Pressure calibration of diamond anvil Raman gauge to 310GPa. Journal of Applied Physics, 100(4). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2335683 29

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2335683 2006

  16. [16]

    Simulation and understanding of atomic and molecular quantum crys - tals

    Cazorla, C.; Boronat, B. Simulation and understanding of atomic and molecular quantum crys - tals. Re v. Mod. Phys. 2017, 89, 035003. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035003

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035003 2017

  17. [17]

    Physical Review Letters , author =

    Perdew, J. P.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Csonka, G. I; Vydrov, O. A; Scuseria, G. E.; Constantin, L. A.; Zhou, X.; Burke, K. Restoring the density- gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 136406. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.136406 2008

  18. [18]

    Kresse and J

    Kresse, G.; Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initi o total -energy calculations us ing a plane -wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 1996

  19. [19]

    Blochl, P. E. Projector augmented- wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 1994

  20. [20]

    u ller, J \

    Togo, A., Chaput, L., Tadano, T. and Tanaka, I. Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2023, 35, 353001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/acd831

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/acd831 2023

  21. [21]

    Perdew, K

    Perdew, J.P., Burke, K. and Ernzerhof, M., 1996. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical review letters, 77(18), p.3865. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996

  22. [22]

    and Yates, J.R., 2019

    Bartók, A.P. and Yates, J.R., 2019. Regularized SCAN functional. The Journal of chemical physics, 150(16). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5094646

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5094646 2019

  23. [23]

    and Marques, M.A., 2022

    Schmidt, J., Wang, H.C., Cerqueira, T.F., Botti, S. and Marques, M.A., 2022. A dataset of 175k stable and metastable materials calculated with the PBEsol and SCAN functionals. Scientific Data, 9(1), p.64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01177-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01177-w 2022

  24. [24]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Csonka, G.I., Perdew, J.P., Ruzsinszky, A., Philipsen, P.H., Lebègue, S., Paier, J., Vydrov, O.A. and Ángyán, J.G., 2009. Assessing the performance of recent density functionals for bulk solids. Physical Review B —Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 79(15), p.155107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.155107

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.155107 2009

  25. [25]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , author =

    Tran, F., Stelzl, J. and Blaha, P., 2016. Rungs 1 to 4 of DFT Jacob’s ladder: Extensive test on the lattice constant, bulk modulus, and cohesive energy of solids. The Journal of chemical physics, 144(20). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948636

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4948636 2016

  26. [26]

    and Yamada, K., 2009

    Ahmad, M.M., Yamane, Y . and Yamada, K., 2009. Structure, ionic conduction, and giant dielectric properties of mechanochemically synthesized BaSnF4. Journal of Applied Physics, 106(7). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3234393

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3234393 2009

  27. [27]

    and Goodwin, A.L., 2012

    Cliffe, M.J. and Goodwin, A.L., 2012. PASCal: a principal axis strain calculator for thermal expansion and compressibility determination. Applied Crystallography, 45(6), 30 pp.1321-1329. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889812043026

    work page doi:10.1107/s0021889812043026 2012

  28. [28]

    and Raynor, G.V ., 1954

    Lee, J.A. and Raynor, G.V ., 1954. The lattice spacings of binary tin- rich alloys. Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section B , 67(10), p.737. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1301/67/10/301

    work page doi:10.1088/0370-1301/67/10/301 1954

  29. [29]

    Muñoz, A.; Yousef, I.; Hebboul, Z.; Errandonea, D., Pressure-induced phase transition and increase of oxygen-iodine coordination in magnesium iodate

    Liang, A., Turnbull, R., Popescu, C., Manjón, F.J., Bandiello, E., Rodriguez - Hernandez, P., Muñoz, A., Yousef, I., Hebboul, Z. and Errandonea, D., 2022. Pressure - induced phase transition and increase of oxygen- iodine coordination in magnesium iodate. Physical Review B, 105(5), p.054105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.054105

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.054105 2022

  30. [30]

    and Hull, S., 1995

    Leger, J.M., Haines, J., Atouf, A., Schulte, O. and Hull, S., 1995. High- pressure x- ray-and neutron-diffraction studies of BaF2: An example of a coordination number of 11 in AX2 compounds. Physical Review B, 52(18), p.13247. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.52.13247

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.52.13247 1995

  31. [31]

    and Le Marchand, G., 2009

    Klotz, S., Chervin, J.C., Munsch, P. and Le Marchand, G., 2009. Hydrostatic limits of 11 pressure transmitting media. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 42(7), p.075413. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/7/075413

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/42/7/075413 2009

  32. [32]

    Geol Earth Mar Sci V olume 7(3): 1-5

    Thomas T (2025) SnF2- Rich Supercritical Fluid in the Variscan Tin DepositZinnwald/Saxony, Germany. Geol Earth Mar Sci V olume 7(3): 1-5. DOI not available

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    and Zhang, D., 2024

    Zhang, X., Li, L., Yu, Y ., Zhang, Q., Sun, N., Mao, Z. and Zhang, D., 2024. High Pressure–Temperature Study of MgF2, CaF2, and BaF2 by Raman Spectroscopy: Phase Transitions and Vibrational Properties of AF2 Difluorides. ACS omega, 9(22), pp.23675- 23687. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c01347

    work page doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c01347 2024

  34. [34]

    and Errandonea, D., 2025

    Karaca, E., Santamaria- Perez, D., Otero -de-la-Roza, A., Oliva, R., Rao, K.S., Achary, S.N., Popescu, C. and Errandonea, D., 2025. Pressure-induced decomposition of Bi14WO24. Results in Physics, 70, p.108170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2025.108170

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2025.108170 2025

  35. [35]

    and Muntasar, A., 1998

    Dénès, G., Madamba, M.C. and Muntasar, A., 1998. Reactivity of SnF2 with Fluorite Type MF2 Versus M: Synthesis of High Performance Fluoride Ion Conductors. MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL), 547, p.377. http://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-547-377

    work page doi:10.1557/proc-547-377 1998

  36. [36]

    and Tyagi, A.K., 2016

    Errandonea, D., Muñoz, A., Rodríguez -Hernández, P., Gomis, O., Achary, S.N., Popescu, C., Patwe, S.J. and Tyagi, A.K., 2016. High- pressure crystal structure, lattice vibrations, and band structure of BiSbO4. Inorganic Chemistry, 55(10), pp.4958- 4969. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00503

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00503 2016

  37. [37]

    and Errandonea, D., 2020

    Liang, A., Rahman, S., Rodriguez -Hernandez, P., Muñoz, A., Manjón, F.J., Nenert, G. and Errandonea, D., 2020. High- pressure Raman study of Fe (IO3) 3: Soft -mode behavior driven by coordination changes of iodine atoms. The Journal of Physical 31 Chemistry C, 124(39), pp.21329-21337. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06541

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06541 2020

  38. [38]

    and Manjon, F.J., 2009

    Errandonea, D. and Manjon, F.J., 2009. On the ferroelastic nature of the scheelite - to-fergusonite phase transition in orthotungstates and orthomolybdates. Materials Research Bulletin, 44(4), pp.807-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2008.09.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2008.09.024 2009

  39. [39]

    and Struzhkin, V .V .,

    Rotundu, C.R., Ćuk, T., Greene, R.L., Shen, Z.X., Hemley, R.J. and Struzhkin, V .V .,

    work page

  40. [40]

    Review of Scientific Instruments, 84(6)

    High-pressure resistivity technique for quasi-hydrostatic compression experiments. Review of Scientific Instruments, 84(6). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4809025

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4809025

  41. [41]

    and Ono, S., 2019

    Suzuki, K., Cadatal-Raduban, M., Kase, M. and Ono, S., 2019. Band gap engineering of CaxSr1-xF2 and its application as filterless vacuum ultraviolet photodetectors with controllable spectral responses. Optical Materials, 88, pp.576- 579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2018.12.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.optmat.2018.12.023 2019

  42. [42]

    and Bell, M.F., 1984

    Dénès, G., Birchall, T., Sayer, M. and Bell, M.F., 1984. BaSnF4—A new fluoride ionic conductor with the α -PbSnF4 structure. Solid State Ionics , 13(3), pp.213- 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(84)90032-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0167-2738(84)90032-8 1984

  43. [43]

    and Dambournet, D., 2024

    Mercadier, B., Legein, C., Body, M., Famprikis, T., Morcrette, M., Suard, E., Masquelier, C. and Dambournet, D., 2024. Insights into the Micro- Structure-Transport Relationships of the Fluoride -Ion Conductor t -BaSnF4 Synthesized by Spark Plasma Sintering. Chemistry of Materials, 36(16), pp.8076-8087. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01644

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01644 2024

  44. [44]

    and Duffy, T.S., 2010

    Dorfman, S.M., Jiang, F., Mao, Z., Kubo, A., Meng, Y ., Prakapenka, V .B. and Duffy, T.S., 2010. Phase transitions and equations of state of alkaline earth fluorides CaF2, SrF2, and BaF2 to Mbar pressures. Physical Review B —Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 81(17), p.174121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.174121

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.174121 2010